Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,141)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • @7:10 What Widdecombe ignores here is the choice the Jews in WWII were given. And it is the same choice the church has given many in its history; convert or die. The fact is the church did nothing except seize an opportunity when they had the Jews right where they wanted them; over a barrel.

  • It sounds like at 6:40 Anne Widdencombe is saying that the Church was responsible for helping Jews during the Holocaust, but the Pope and the organized church signed a treaty with Hitler from the beginning. While individual priests, nuns, and members of the church hid Jews, the organized Church(which is what the motion refers to), was less helpful.

  • Wow, strong words. nice.

  • Widdencombe is like what I imagine Dolores Umbridge would be like.

  • My one and only thought when Ms. Widdencombe took to the stage:

    "Attention. Citizen. You have been charged with. Socio. Endangerment. Level. 1."

  • Poor Ann Widdecombe. Look at this creature.

  • damn this lady is insane...

  • Was reading the comments... wondering what everybody was talking about Monty Python. Lol, Now I know 6:00 :D

    

  • Christopher just tore shit up

  • She sounds like when the Monty Python guys are playing women.

  • @DJMattB241 Holy fuk LOL! This should be voted top comment...

  • @DJMattB241 I feel the need to ask if I can have her liver.

  • I like how he says "Thank you for having me." as if his job has been quite completed then and there. Judging by the crowds reaction, he may have been quite right.

  • Hitchens must be one of the most brilliantly vicious debaters of all time.

  • @XmorbaneX Would that be the enlightenment which the church rallied against? Or the work ethic that is so Catholic that we call it Protestant?

    There is good in the Catholic church, but a church it is, and for that reason it is already fighting an uphill struggle to win the reasoned argument.

  • I'm a self confessed agnostic, no fan of organised religion and find Christopher and Stephen's position agreeable.

    But I think I could have done a much more convincing job for the affirmative - what about the enlightenment? What about the work ethic? What about the philosophy of forgiveness over retribution that came with the rise of the new testament? What about he brotherhood of man? What about the churches contribution to science (not an obvious one but a historically sound point)?

  • thats her normal voice? really?

  • @JoshLulz Sinister, eh?

  • The only Nazi mass murderer the CC ex-communicated was Goebles and that was because he married a protestant. At least they've got their standards.

  • This argument is pointless, annoying and filled with personal insults to the opposite party, in case you two haven't realized.

  • Comment removed

  • I leave it to the rest of us with sense and understanding of the world to make sure

    Mr Trilliondollarman is shown that not all of us are as bad as him and that we can look at him as a example of how to live a better life. be that with or without faith. he is the archetype of ignorance and deserves our pity to the best of our ability. he has and never will win if you join in a argument with him so be assured you can and should do so. logic will beat him down in time but for now im done with him.

  • @MrRopedragon

    I leave it to believers to use MrRopedragon as an example of how ignorant and stupid atheists actually are..he is the poster child for atheist assholes everywhere...worse than Stalin, if you can imagine that. I will always win any arguments with atheists since I have a much stronger grasp of the facts and logic than any a-the-tard out there.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Lest we forget you claimed the Bible was antisemitic but when I asked you for verses that show it, you couldn't come up with any. Instead of admitting you make a mistake, you keep on with the accusation even though you knew you had nothing to go on...but facts be damned when you can make religion look bad, right?

  • @MrRopedragon

    Or...how about how you tried but failed to show how the Bible reduces women to property? Remember that? That was pathetic...the context didn't even agree with you!!!

    Dumbass!!!

  • Ok...I am not going to listen to anything an atheist says until I hear a group apology for the following: -Stalin -Mao -Pol Pot -The Marque De Sade -The Communist Manifesto -Hitler and Nazism -Karl Marx -The Norway Shooter -Jeffery Dahlmer -Sartre
  • @MrTrilliondollarman So long as you apoligize for -raping of children - torturing of children - mass extortion - torturing of those who read the bible in english - the holocaust - the Spanish inquisition - the crusades - the suffering of aids patients in Uganda and rowanda who cannot use condoms in their eyes - the system of oppression built up over years and years during the dark ages - the money and artifacts taken from other countries for NO good reason sorry I've ran out of characters......
  • @MrRopedragon

    Those don't need any apologies since atheism has no basis for saying any of them are wrong. Nice try, but you fail. In fact, most of what you put on here are historical falsehoods. Christianity is responsible for the holocaust? I have testimony from Roman Jews who credit Pius XII for saving their lives. AIDS is down in Africa in areas who follow Church teaching. And no one uses the phrase Dark Ages anymore.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Listen boy Im afraid all of what you just said is irrelevant and I will explain why. When one looks into the ideology of a person whom is religious I am afraid it is influenced very heavily by faith and, though it is not the case for all, had Hitler not been a Christian there would be no holocaust as it goes with the general change of time. And even better, atheists are not influenced by faith and only the individual could be blamed :3

  • @MrRopedragon

    Everything you just is wrong and I'll explain why: If what you said is true, then atheism has much, MUCH more to answer for. If however, you are saying while atheists may have done bad things, it was just those, then you can't blame Christianity for those events. You can't have it both ways. Also, it is well established that Hitler was more influenced by Nietzsche than Christianity, so your facts are wrong.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman I can blame christianity for it's influence on others and I am you idiot. I will blame anything that has caused somthing even if it has a small influence upon this event and as a Result YES I will blame your bloody misguided faith for the suffering of so many people.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Then you're a fucking retard then...where in the Bible does it say it's okay to kill Jews? Where does it say women are nothing more then sex toys?

    So...does that mean all Norwegians are to blame for causing that shooting? Just when I think you can't get any stupider, you just keep talking.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman In the old testiment a man is found gathering sticks on the sabbath day by Moses followers. they ask Yahweh for guidance on what to do and as a result he orders them to stone him to death. The day of rest for Jews is Saturday....

  • @MrRopedragon

    Yet that violated a rule on what counted as work in a separate book on Judaic Law.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Oh so the idea of violating holy war has never happened in Christian history? xD I refer to my previous examples of violence by Christians.

  • @MrRopedragon

    And you would be wrong yet again on that...The Crusades were a justified counter that followed just war doctrine.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman THOU SHALT NOT KILL! that seems pretty solid

    it doesn't say THOU SHALT NOT KILL unless something bad happened and it is seen by you as acceptable by a doctrine written by a mortal man called thomas equinas and not me :3

  • @MrRopedragon

    Yet...that is not what the understanding of the commandment is, you fucking idiot.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman The commandments are pretty clear as to what is and what is not acceptable and you cannot bend them,

  • @MrRopedragon

    Again, not true. You seem okay with violating the prohibition against false witness.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman What is not true?....

    I would like to also point out that i am not Christian so your bullshit doctrine means nothing to me mate but it damn well should to you and yet you're breaking it on multiple occasions.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Except for the fact you don't appreciate lies or incorrect facts, right? Then why do you lie and get facts wrong all the time?

  • @MrTrilliondollarman I have not got any facts wrong. merely put them in wrong context you however have on may occasions because you are a idiot :P

  • @MrRopedragon

    Yes, you have...you thought Just War Theory began with Aquinas, when it was actually Augustine. You thought Hitler was a Christian when he clearly wasn't. In fact, you haven't gotten anything right at any time.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman There are hundreds of Christian contextualised references in the nazi regime even on their fucking belt buckles so don't say he wasn't a fucking Christian.

  • @MrRopedragon

    No, he wasn't. That phrase was actually stolen from a German knight order. There are much more references to atheist works.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Im afraid that the phrase had the word god in it and no matter it's origin it was used in a context of justification and therefore would have been viewed by followers as Christian reference.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Sorry, but that's illogical. Several Christian philosophers quote from atheist writer Sartre, so does that mean they are really atheists? Of course not.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman besides the just war theory was written over a hundered years after them.........fucking idiot *shakes head*

  • @MrRopedragon

    Not even close. Just War came BEFORE, not after.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Born Thomas Aquinas

    1225

    Roccasecca, Kingdom of Sicily

    Died 7 March 1274

    Fossanova, Kingdom of Sicily

    Sorry but he was a writer of this theory.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Yet the first one was Augustine of Hippo and he died in 430. The Crusades were several centuries later...fucking idiot!!!

  • @MrTrilliondollarman So? the officially recognised TO THIS DAY version was written MANY centuries after and im afraid even outside of this theory the things that many people did were....deplorable... despicable and your trying to justify it all you fucking psychopath.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Yet, that was not the version that was known at the time. Now you're committing the historians fallacy..and you trying to claim otherwise makes you even more fucking stupid!!

  • @MrTrilliondollarman I am going by what we see as ethically right and if the church didn't know better then, to quote stephen fry :3, WHAT ARE YOU FOR???

  • @MrRopedragon

    Then Fry is an even bigger dipshit who commits more logical fallacies...simple as that.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Logical fallacies? the church has done so for hundereds of years and said to be justified by faith. but he has no faith and therefore his logic cannot be backed by the idea of being infallible.

  • @MrRopedragon

    They have committed no fallacies at all and you cannot convince me to the contrary...period. Cannot be done.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman So the fact that they said the universe revolved round the sun despite evidence over the course of hundreds of years (it was found by a Greek mathematician many years before Christianity existed but was never credited) that wasn't illogical?

  • @MrRopedragon

    They never said any such thing and never held it as infallible either. I also like how when I asked you where in the Bible it says it's okay to kill Jews or treat women like objects, you ignored both questions.

    So who's dishonest again? That would be you, a-the-tard.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman The context of a mans wife is used in the same as a mans possession in commandment 10 referencing: "thou shalt not covet thy neighbours wife nor his ox or any other worldly possession "

  • @MrRopedragon

    Except the Hebrew does not use the word for earthly possession when it comes to the wife. You lose again.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman No but it does use it in the same context which was my point. you're obviously missing everything I am saying.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Because what you said was WRONG!!! Women have NEVER at any point been considered an earthly possession. Does the verse say "husbands, love your possessions as Christ loves his church?" No...it says "wives."

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Im afraid the church does say that wives must be faithfull but husbands are not even mentioned as if they are allowed to do as they wish. ALSO you say the ten commandments are wrong despite your countless references to it earlier so please be fucking consistent :P

  • @MrRopedragon

    Not even close...I directly quoted a Bible verse, fucking idiot. I never said they were wrong...your take on them is wrong and will always be wrong...dipshit.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman You are quoting a translated bible which is likely to not even be close to the Aramaic texts of which the entire bible is derived from... Jesus Christ

  • @MrRopedragon

    Christ didn't write any of the Bible, dumbass. They are very close to the texts..you just don't understand the translation.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman The king james bible is not at all close to the Aramaic texts because alot of it was not literally translated.

  • @MrRopedragon

    I don't use the KJB. Bunch of worthless paper...I use a much better translation.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Oh? So you have the one that WASN'T translated by the same people and actually was changed to have shit grammar and errors riddled without? *ponders*....

  • @MrRopedragon

    Wrong again, dumbass. I have the Bible that does not have 7 books missing...the KJB does.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman also KGB were Russian so why would they read the king James bible?....

  • @MrRopedragon

    That makes no sense at all, but keep digging your own grave there.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman I will and i'll die with a smile on my face knowing I have found the worlds dumbest human being :3

  • @MrRopedragon

    So you found yourself then? ;)

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Also when did I say he wrote some of the bible...please quote me.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman AND it violates many of the ideas in just war theory

    - murdered and tortured POW's

    - they had a much larger army

    - civilians were killed and raped

    What the fuck are you talking about?

  • @MrRopedragon

    Not even close...

    First happened in spite of orders, army size means nothing, and the last was also not authorized.

    So...are you on fucking drugs?

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Whether or not they were authorised does not bloody matter and you know it. All of these were carried out by Christians under the context of them "retaking the holy land" so don't you try to even say it wasn't authorisation. also the pope of the time said that their sins would be washed clean in the eyes of god in this war which to me is authorisation enough in that position.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Actually, it very well matters, and YOU FUCKING KNOW IT!!! The Crusades were fought as a defensive call from the Byzantine Empire so don't you dare think you know better when you obviously don't.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman I don't claim I do but mate I don't care what it was about or why it happened. what matters is what happened. people look for the ideas behind a war and why it happened while looking as far away from the stuff within it as possible to make it justifiable.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Now you're trying but failing to cover up your own mistake...it didn't work and you're fucking stupid for not just admitting you were wrong.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman I will never try to cover up my mistakes because I just addmited in those contexts that the facts were in fact wrong so please don't try to patronise me.

  • @MrRopedragon

    No, you didn't...you lied your ass off so I will hound you until you do admit you made a mistake.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Hound me? you can do fuck all to make me admit anything my friend because my idea of your standing is so low you may as well not be on earth at all.

  • @MrRopedragon

    If size were based on honesty, you would be no bigger than a grain of salt so don't you fucking dare.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Well im actually 6ft 3 so I am obviously very trustworthy in this little world of yours. besides the catholic church would be smaller than a fucking quark in that world so don't you try to say a analogy like that as a justification of my trustworthiness or you'll end up looking like a fool...oops you already do.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Making shit up about your height will get you nowhere..The Catholic Church would make all nations and planets small by comparison so, again, you can't convince me otherwise.

    No one can look more fucking stupid than you already do, a-the-tard.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman ah but im afraid the last statement is untrue because you're here ;)

  • @MrRopedragon

    Yet you still are not answering my question, so what I said was right...;)

  • @MrTrilliondollarman What was the question again? sorry I got caught up in all your stupidity.

  • @MrRopedragon

    That would be your idiocy, a-the-tard. You got nothing right at all.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman You shall not covet your neighbor's house. You shall not covet your neighbor's wife, or his manservant or maidservant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.

    BELONGS!!!

  • @MrRopedragon

    Yet not what the word means in Hebrew...you atheists sure have problems with idiomatic phrases, dont you?

  • @MrTrilliondollarman It is not based on the word you retard it is the context of use that matters. it references all the specifics it can so don't try to tell me otherwise. AND hebrew is not the original language of the bible you fucking idiot.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Yet in the context, women are not viewed as possessions.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman But they are said in the context of such.... please open your eyes

  • @MrRopedragon

    It does no such thing. Women were never viewed as just objects...and you still haven't answered my question.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman And you haven't said it back to me because I can't be arsed to wade through our argument to find the ramblings of a lunatic. say it again or you will have no answer.

  • @MrRopedragon

    OR...I can just point out you're stupider than fuck and I know for a fact you can't answer this:

    Where in the Bible does it say it's okay to kill Jews? Keep in mind I have the counter to any answer you can come up with right here with me.

    Now, answer if you can, though I doubt that very much.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Ahhh thank you no it doesn't say that but it does not condemn homosexuality, a thing held by many Christians oddly enough.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Not the question though. You just tore your own stand down.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Do you think islam played a part in the 9/11 attacks? well im afraid the koraan doesn't state or justify ANYTHING of the sort so don't try to derive a direct teaching of such.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Nice try, but wrong. The Koran does designate warfare against non-Muslims, so your stand ONCE AGAIN comes up short..

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Oh also I forgot to mention how I doubt a person with IQ: 150 would say "bum-fuck".....or be Christian :P

  • @MrRopedragon

    Yet I refuted everything you just said and pointed out your numerous fallacies...so this Christian is a LOT smarter than you can ever hope to be...;)

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Fuck this im coming off for the night to have a nap I will be back tomorrow to verbally rape you again and take your pathetic little comments which make no difference to me whatsoever :P stupid little child *shakes head* this is not a victory for you nor is it a loss for me and we will see eachother again soon :) be assured of that.

  • @MrRopedragon

    You mean to dig your own grave and keep getting bitch-slapped by me? Any time, a-the-tard. You might want to look up what fallacies and facts are though...seems like I ran circles around you with both of them. This is very much a victory and will remain so.

    But go ahead and run away...that's all atheists are good for anyway.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Im coming back...not running away you retard. Think this a victory if you will but to me you're merely made to be even more of a theistic little punk with his head up his arse so far he can't see the truth in front of his eyes. and with that I bid you good night sir. I will end this in good fortune if you will not. strange how a atheist will but a Christian won't eh? :P

  • @MrRopedragon

    Came back to be schooled again, eh? To me, you're a worthless atheist fuckwit with no brains or balls, and your ass and head are interchangeable. Strange how a Christian got facts right but the atheist didn't, eh?

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Right im back because you do not follow anything to do with the Christian faith and therefore I am forced to come up with one conclusion...you aren't Christian and so I have spent the entirety of this time talking to a person with no standing in this subject. So from now on I am justified in seeing myself as winning in any debate we have because you have no founding. :)

  • @MrRopedragon

    Or...I'm a Christian who knows better than you do and will always know better than you do.

    I can say I win and you have nothing to say to the contrary...;)

  • @MrTrilliondollarman You are not a Christian in any context. You do not follow it's tenants to any extent especially in the sense of accepting others and loving your fellow man. If you believe these tenants to be true then be assured that you are going to hell :) and we can debate there forever if there is anything beyond death.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman You do not follow the ideas that jesus prided

    - loving your fellow man (love thy neighbour)

    - accept others

    How are you a Christian again?

  • @MrRopedragon

    I do both of those things...Jesus did not say it's okay to think one idea is just as good as another, nor would He approve of saying there is no god or accepting atheism.

    Looks like you're shit out of luck again.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Jesus certainly said that when facing aggression one should "offer the other cheek" rather than retort or come back with a form of greater and more veracious aggression.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Except when He chased the money changers out and referred to the Pharisees as "a broad of vipers."

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Be assured I will continue. I can't let a twat like you go round thinking he is the king of all of the world but I am no longer seeing you as a theistic opponent and more of a.....nobody to whom I air my views and retorts at :). Goodnight to you.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Be assured I will smack you down every time. I can't let a a-the-tard like you tout bullshit and go unanswered. You have always been a nobody and will stop existing once you die..whereas I will keep going and living...

  • @MrTrilliondollarman And you haven't smacked me down once yet and you won't ever, and I don't want to be remembered mate. I hold no visions of grandeur or hope that I will have statues erected of me when I die. because I am a man who feels as though if I am to make a difference then helping others (as medicine is my professional choice) will be my method of doing so and I can't give a fuck more if I am remembered for it :)

  • @MrRopedragon

    I've smacked you down all the time...so much fun...;) You don't want to be remembered? You must have very poor self-esteem. You're a doctor? I feel bad for your patients then. I hope you don't tell them you're an atheist; otherwise, they're going to think you don't really care whether they live or die...

  • @MrTrilliondollarman But you seem to want to live on in peoples memories which leads me to believe in your arrogance all the more and thus also reinforces the notion of your very real non-Christian ideology and how it is utterly pointless to use as a debating point if you are to say about being a Christian. :)

  • @MrRopedragon

    Or...you read into something that isn't there and don't want to admit I will affect the world for the better on a grander scale than you ever will.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Do you think I care that you'll effect the world? and be frank it will only be in a bad way and nothing else. But I am tired of this debate and so I will conclude.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Wrong on everything again...but no surprise there so what else is new?

  • @MrTrilliondollarman You have taught me that I am a good person in the sense that I do things for others and I do not berrate others and I do not wish ill will on others. you do. You have reinforced the notion to me that I am capable of so much more than you ever will in your entire life and even if I am not remembered or cared for it I will look back at you and know I did not stoop as low as to reach the archetype of which I pity the most.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Wrong again. I have shown you're a babbling moron who doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground. You deserve to be talked down to and put in his place...which is face down in the mud. You have instead reenforced the negative view people have of atheists and shown what I have always known...atheists are morons.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman I will exist and die beyond that I hope for no more than that I can help others and actually make a difference and, though this debate has caused me to lost all sense of acceptance for Christianity for a short while, understand all viewpoints and ideas no matter how vile or horrid they may seem to me. My life can exist in anguish or torment or anything but I will still know that I cannot be like you and will not be like you.

  • @MrRopedragon

    HAHAAHAHAAA!!! Nothing of the sort will ever happen to you...you will die and be gone forever...at least if we are to believe in atheism...you have shown me atheism poses no threat at all and is just filled with outdated, inaccurate rubbish. You will be like me and detest atheism if you had any brains.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman And so I would like to remind you of your arrogance by counting the number of times you've said wrong. and I do hope that in my entire lifetime I will not reach such a insurpassable number. your pathetic illogical rants bring nothing but pity to you and as a result I don't actually see any reason to talk with you any longer. you have lost. Though you're small mind doesn't see it. and you can reply now if you wish. I will not read it or anything you ever put :).

  • @MrRopedragon

    Because you were wrong, idiot...I'm not going to use any other word if you've been proven wrong on something...your childish grasp of the world will get you nowhere and I do hope that all atheists are one day as fucking stupid as you are, so the world will wise up and laugh at you endlessly. I have won and always will...and you just admitted to giving me the final word.

    Dumbass.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman You have the final word :) do with it what you will but does it make you any better than me? no neither of us are better than the other. I am morally and ethically better but these are emotional states they change nothing. So choose your final word and feel proud about it. you can look back and say..."I won a debate in which I learned and taught nothing!". :) I will read your final statement to see how you are to finish up but be quick about it I haven't much time.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Of course I'm better than you and always will be...I know the truth of the world and you don't. In fact, you don't know much of anything...I warned you that I've heard all the arguments before and know how to refute them yet you still argued with me anyway. Now you're acting like a little bitch because I proved you wrong and you can't stand it...well, too fucking bad.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Ok fine based on that I will come up with a final statement for me then. and then Im going.

  • @MrRopedragon

    With your tail between your legs like any other worthless atheist...

  • @MrRopedragon

    Now...your pathetic response which I know right away will be bullshit?

  • @MrTrilliondollarman I will finish up by saying that the Christian scum like you who preach the word of god and disregard it's rules are despisable and though I do not despise you my girlfriend ( who is Christian ) probably would. Your sheer lack of composure and understanding will get you sent to hell according to your scripture and I'll be waiting for you with a Martini to start the debate that will last for all eternity :)

  • @MrRopedragon

    I will bury you once again by saying atheist dirt like you who show your true colors like you did are beyond contempt. No wonder atheism is dying and people are wising up already..you don't have a girlfriend and if you do, she should leave you before her faith is further threatened by your nonsense. I'll be up in heaven while you'll only exist as a flaming tomb in the sixth circle.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman And though to you I will become a nobody, to me you already are, not in status, not in sanding, not in anything but your pomp, your arrogance, your weakness and finally, your self centredness so I am glad I am not you and though you may feel the same about me I can considerably say (without faith) that mine is a much stronger feeling of contempt. You are nobody to me and will consider to be so and that pretty much finishes it. good day to you :)

  • @MrRopedragon

    And now you're a fucking liar...;)

    I'm glad I got rid of this atheism foolishness long ago...so I never became such a fucking a-the-tard like you...

    I finished it, not you...you fucking lost!!

  • @MrTrilliondollarman *claps hands* c'mon everyone give this guy a big hand! he managed to win! woooooh!.....wait......what do we get for winning again?....

  • @MrRopedragon

    I get another win for me for beating another atheist...pity you turned out to be a whinny little bitch...I was going to use you for my Adopt an Atheist program.

  • @MrRopedragon

    In fact, from now on, I'll put things in the only words you seem to understand:

    Uh...der...snarl..snort.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Also I talk with a higher degree of sophistication than you do and I don't use a retort such as "bum-fuck" so Im afraid I don't understand your point :)

  • @MrRopedragon

    Talking in pseudo-facts and fallacies does not make you more sophisticated than a grunt. You don't understand much of anything so what are you getting at?

  • @MrTrilliondollarman How many times have I asked for you not to dissolve into insulting and stick to the points we are making. your repressed sexual tension from being a Christian has nothing to do with this.

  • @MrRopedragon

    How many times have I told you not to be so FUCKING stupid? I know as an atheist, you're naturally dumb and lazy but do you expect me to believe you're this dumb?

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Well stupidity is a inbuilt thing im afraid insults are not.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Yet you just called yourself stupid...odd.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Not really because in the grand scheme I am but I do have a IQ of 124 so Im slightly above average but not considered exceedingly smart. besides you're just berating a stupid person if I am stupid and is that not beneath your immense knowledge your highness?

  • @MrRopedragon

    My IQ is 150...so you still look puny. Besides, I would think someone with a 124 IQ would know better than to commit an historians fallacy.

    Keep failing though, kid. You're doing great at it...

  • @MrTrilliondollarman Kid? how old are you to be debating this? also why would somebody who is almost as smart as Stephen hawking doing wasting his time on those beneath him?.... nice try kid but I somehow doubt that so stop lying.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Flattered, but still wrong. Hawking's IQ is over 200. I would expect someone with an IQ like yours to get that wrong.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman He is NOT over 200 that is counted as immeasurable genius. he has not yet released it but it is speculated to be 160 or so. Somebody of your intelligence SURELY should have got that :3

  • @MrRopedragon

    Actually, IQs of over 200 have been reported. But that still doesn't change the fact he and I both make you look very small..;)

  • @MrTrilliondollarman No it has but I didn't say it wasn't possible my boy.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Yet you still got it wrong, little whelp.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman besides im not sure how saying im lying about my height has any reference to this but I am that height.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Yet your size was in reference to your honesty, not your appearance.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman No but my point was basing this in you're deluded little world. READ DAMNIT XD

  • @MrRopedragon

    Already have...it says nothing even close to what you said.

  • @MrTrilliondollarman And please don't tell me not to dare to do something because I will and I will not be held back by you to say something you complete ignorant theistic fuck.

  • @MrRopedragon

    Then you should have no trouble with this question then: Where in the Bible does it say or imply it's okay to kill Jews?

  • @MrTrilliondollarman shall I have to reference the killing of a man on the sabbath day AGAIN?

  • @MrRopedragon

    So you want to make the same mistake you're too fucking stupid to learn from?