American coverage is horrific, i think over the whole 4 rounds they showed more of Keegan Bradley in the middle of the pack than Laird in the top 4 who was miles ahead of him. Even when they Simpson,Laird were on the last hole they started showing a crappy review of the tournament and showed the remaining putts on replay. Get a grip Finchem and co.
No they were showing the likes of Bradley when he was barely in the top 20. Sorry but impartiality is important, especially when it involves a guy who can actually win compared to a guy who's just trying to win a few more dollars. Fair enough i can understand Tiger but Bradley except winning the PGA which was impressive,granted has done nothing. I'd much rather watch Watson.
@MacHoodio i agree with what you are saying but televising the tournament is for advertising the sport and they are trying to show the people that they think are the most well known or the most likeable people they can. why do you think they still showed tiger when he played like crap vs many people who were beating him by several strokes.
Then he made bogey...BOUUGEY!
sickiteo1 2 weeks ago
Martin laird... the amount of putts he missed throughout the week and his rusty chipping.. he could've won easily
jamesbrady7 1 month ago
@jamesbrady7 woulda coulda shoulda
BryanHersch 1 month ago
@BryanHersch so many what ifs but his short game was at times appalling. stricker had it too easy from the field
jamesbrady7 1 month ago
Stricker is a beast! Major time!
prorobo 1 month ago
Stricker your not Tiger!
HC32KING 1 month ago
American coverage is horrific, i think over the whole 4 rounds they showed more of Keegan Bradley in the middle of the pack than Laird in the top 4 who was miles ahead of him. Even when they Simpson,Laird were on the last hole they started showing a crappy review of the tournament and showed the remaining putts on replay. Get a grip Finchem and co.
MacHoodio 1 month ago
@MacHoodio cuz he freakin holed out. plus he's a major champ. besides laird is european.
cleorkzths 1 month ago
@cleorkzths
No they were showing the likes of Bradley when he was barely in the top 20. Sorry but impartiality is important, especially when it involves a guy who can actually win compared to a guy who's just trying to win a few more dollars. Fair enough i can understand Tiger but Bradley except winning the PGA which was impressive,granted has done nothing. I'd much rather watch Watson.
MacHoodio 1 month ago
@MacHoodio i agree with what you are saying but televising the tournament is for advertising the sport and they are trying to show the people that they think are the most well known or the most likeable people they can. why do you think they still showed tiger when he played like crap vs many people who were beating him by several strokes.
xCEREALzKILLERx 1 month ago
yh its a joke noboby cares about him
ellis505 1 month ago
good job stricker
chrislsarac 1 month ago