And moreover not hitting it (the pentagon) in the center! I think any nutcase with an IQ of more than 45 can think that if u gonna crash a plane onto the pentagon to hurt US, then u better crash it at the center of it rather than the sides for more damage.
Add to this the fact that the FBI has constantly refused to release some 15+ footage taken by various sources near pentagon of the incident. U had think they would release them if it supported their official theory.
Some questions that were never answered in the official 9/11 story:
1. Collapse of Tower-7.
2. Collapse of Tower-1 & 2 at free fall speeds. Conservation of momentum will tell u that this can't happen.
3. Pancake fashion collapse of all the 3 towers. Yet again science is against it.
4. Incredible maneuvering required to hit the pentagon. Pentagon is a "horizontal" building rather than a vertical one. U just can't maneuver a "15 ton" plane at 220 km/hr speed hitting the pentagon at the sides.
@RadSMeshhy You're just rehashing lies that have been refuted countless times. Look at youtube video watch?v=qLShZOvxVe4 for example. Google "debunking 911" and prepare to be amazed.
@salvadory. I did not see the part where anyone threatens anyone else with death. Just that gasbag Hitchens refusing to listen to any views he does not like. Where in the video is the death threat made? And, if this guy allegedly made a death threat prior to the satrt of this video, why is he still at the meeting and not thrown out?
@Uncle99B hitchens listened to views he didnt like and debated them all his adult life- it is reported this man interupted numerous times- shouting over other questioners and the talkers and threatening the panel that allah would take his revenge on them- by the point in this video they had enough! if you think Hitchens stifled views your nuts- he loved to destroy peoples views with logic and reason so its clear he had enough of the guy who was tossed out
@salvadory. It is reported the guy did so and so? Where is the video showing this? Hitch listened to views he didn't like and debated them his whole adult life? All I see is his refusal to do just that. You make two assertions that are 180% opposite of what we see happening on this video.
@Uncle99B well clearly you havent watched many hitchens videos so stop wasting your time with a "blowhard"- you obviously made up your mind off one video which shows how you think! as someone who watched hundreds of videos of hitchens on youtube i can safely say that if the guy was asked to leave it was for a good reason- as of the rest of the video i havent found it but im going by what was reported by other viewers and it makes sense since he doesnt have a history of censoring people
@salvadory. That is correct. I made my judgement about this video based on what was on this video. As far as Hitchens in general, I have formed my opinion that he was a gasbag based on watching and listening to him for years
@Uncle99B well atleast youre honest! if you want to see hitchens exercising extreme restraint watch his interview with white racist tom metzger on here- i would have punched the clown in the face but hitchens calmly let him talk
@salvadory So he (allegedly) lets a white racist bigot speak but refuses to answer legit questions about 911. And this shows him in a positive light in your mind how?
@Uncle99B he had to- it was a show on CNN(he was a guest host) ofcourse he mocked them and debated them but he also let them do all the damage to themselves with their own words - feel free to watch it- and as ive said its his book event and even the moderator is clearly letting the man know theyve had enough-!
@Uncle99B It's not a legit question. The person trying to ask that question should not only be ignored in this type of assembly, but should be ridiculed relentlessly until they come to their senses. The question has been answered thousands of times, and it's clear it's just not the answer he wants to hear. He had an agenda and wanted his two minutes to spread his BS. Kudos to them for killing the mic and not letting him speak to the whole assembly.
@Uncle99B The exact question, no. But the question was on 911, inside job, Bush's involvement. There were annotations in the video where you'll see a little of what he was saying. He didn't want an answer. He wanted to spread "awareness".
@tommy605. The questioner noted that Al Qaeda did not schedule the war games that took NORAID out of the air on 911. A good point. Hitch pandered to the Zionist dupes. If there is one thing the Zionists do not believe in, it is free speech when it results in a challenge to their carefully crafted narrative. Hitch was an obnoxious puppet sold as an original, a maverick
@Uncle99B Of course he was. Can't possibly be that 911 was carried out by cave dwellers that caught the US defense with their pants down and showed every person on the planet that the US is not beyond terrorism. Just as vulnerable as any other country. No one said there aren't questions left that we'd like to see answered, but that does NOT automatically make Bush and company involved or responsible. Most of your questions are answered, but they're just not the answers you want to hear.
@tommy605 Err. Nobody is saying Bush was involved. We are just pointing out that Hitch does not wish to adrress the many fact about 911 that do not support the official narrative. You say you want answers to these questions but then support Hitch's sitting there like a little bitch saying 'go away, go away" when asked one.
@Uncle99B So, you think that maybe somehow, Hitch has answers? That he is somehow privy to information from that day from..... the government? The terrorists? He has his opinions, that he got from the same sources most of us got ours from. He just understood them differently than the truthers and view those people as conspiracy nuts and he won't tolerate them using his time for their agenda
Yes, I am conditioned. To follow the evidence. It doesn't matter his specific question, It's been answered
@tommy605. So you do not, or can not, admit that you do not know the question that was asked yet will nonetheless make the blanket statement it has been answered many times before?
@Uncle99B "The exact question, no. But the question was on 911, inside job, Bush's involvement" This is a quote from my post the other day. I said I didn't know the exact question. But I have found the original posting of the video, and there was no question. Just him saying he wanted to ask just one question. (I thought I heard 911, but I could be mistaken)
And yes, over 10 years, the questions have been asked, and answered. There are no new questions. Even in 2007, no new questions.
@tommy605. You don't know the question but claim it does not deserve answer? There are dozens of holes in the official story of 911 and none of them have been answered. His point was that NORAID was conveniently pulled out of the northeast corridor on 911 and so could not respond and that it surely was not Al Qaeda who did this. This cannot be refuted -- so Hitch and his fellow Zionist agents refuse to address it. Israel's fingerprints are all over 911; this cannot become public knowledge
@Uncle99B No, it wasn't0 and this is an excellent example of a question that has been answered, but you just not liking the answer and choose to believe the one that fits your already biased belief. When all you look at is sites like standdown net, you will only hear one side of the story, and when you hear the real explanation, it's quote mined and misrepresented to show "gaps" or "lies" in the official story.
@Uncle99B How about the FAA didn't notify the military until after the third plane crashed? There was no automated method for the civilian air traffic controllers to alert NORAD. Add to that that the hijackers turned off or disabled the onboard radar transponders making it next to impossible to id 1 plane from 4500 others in the same area. AND, NORAD interceptions were limited to offshore ADIZ at the time. No domestic intercepts.
There are answers, just not what you want to hear.
@tommy605. What was the answer to the question about NORAID and the war games? You claim it was answered. What about the Israeli "art students" who had followed the alleged hijackers around for months? What about the Israelis stopped on GW Bridge with a car filled with explosives on 911? How about the Israelis seen filming and celebrating as the towers fell and who claimed they were there to document the event? What are all the excellent answers to these questions?
@Uncle99B First, let's just get this out. Truthers are making the claim there was a conspiracy, and inside job, so it is their responsibility to provide that evidence. The fact the 99% of the evidence provided is easily answered or proved to be "manufactured" (through photoshop, after effects, etc) shows their case relies solely on the few remaining unanswered questions.
All your questions, are answered. Try looking on non truther sites. Look objectively. Or follow the truther source.
@Uncle99B Look up the claims they make, then look at their source. Follow where that source got their information. Then follow that one. See what you find.
I don't expect you to change your views based on anything anyone says or provides evidence for. You have a predetermined biased outcome. "Zionist" seems to be your word of choice.
So what was the reason for this inside job? The war? To hide the insider trading? To remove freedoms? To ensure a re-election? All of the above?
@tommy605. Surely you know the reasons the Zionist would pull yet another in a long line of false falg ops against the USA. You kep talking about evidence yet cannot answer one of the questions I have posed. You want an absurd conspriracy theory? How about several fanatical muslims, seen frequenting strip clubs (huh?), somehow get NORIAD to leave the skies open, successfully hijack 4 out of 4 airliners with boxcutters, and knock down three buildings in NYC by hitting 2 of them.
@BringBRToTheUK. What about the Israeli "art students" who had followed the alleged hijackers around for months? What about the Israelis stopped on GW Bridge with a car filled with explosives on 911? How about the Israelis seen filming and celebrating as the towers fell and who claimed they were there to document the event? How about larry Silverstein and his son and daughter not showing up for work on 911?
@tommy605 . You claim that all the questions I raised have been answered. Can you answer just one of them? How did those Israeli art students know to follow the alleged hi-jackers around? No answer? What was a truck filled with explosives and Israelis doing on the GW Bridge on 911? No answer? How did those Israelis know to be there to "document" (their word) 911? Still no answer?
@tommy605. Then, for the first time in history of plane accidents on land, the balck boxes are never recovered. Nobody had any idea this was coming, yet by that afternoon it was already being pinned on Osama. And the very next morning the newspaper were filled with pictures of the alleged hi-jackers entering the planes in Logan and the media apparently had all the details even though nobody knew nothing 24 hours earlier. And that is the story you believe.
@tommy605. Notice how you do not know the question that was asked yet will nonetheless make the blanket statement is has been answered many time before? Do you not see this? Do you not see how you have been conditioned?
@ubermisogynist How is having a fun time irrational? Should it be every mans aim to live to 80? Everyone dies just at different times and you can bet your ass that Hitchens had a good time when drunk and smoking and if having a good time is not the measure of a good life then I don't know what is.
@Lulzalutioners he drank/smoked himself to death because he was unhappy..he was an alcoholic..just about every interview show i've seen him on he was drunk..on Bill Maher he actually had hard liquer on set with him..even Maher was like "WTF" .. all that hate towards people of faith..pointless..i know religious people and have them watch Maher shows/movies and Hitchens/Dawkins etc shows to see their reaction..guess what..they don't care..most say they feel sorry for them..
@ubermisogynist Haha you're so completely wrong. Have you read anything by him? I read his memoir Hitch 22 where he describes a lot of fun evenings with friends. You're actually just assuming the whole thing about him being drunk at shows. Maher was actually pretty happy with him, he was not "like WTF" as you eloquently put it. He did not hate people of faith he actually hated them when they started killing and interfering with his life and the life of others.
Check out my Videos "Religion is ridiculous" (specifically christianity)...good stuff...rate it! Christians I CHALLENGE you to watch with an open mind. Atheists watch and if you like the videos then give thumbs up!!! Help spread the truth!!
@trifulquita15 Like the top commenter wrote, he was yelling and screaming earlier on about how Allah was going to kill Hitchens and all infidels - Would you invite a neonazi to speak on a public discussion on equality and human rights? No.
no, i would not. Actually u are right. Sometimes i obey our politically correct system. I was wrong. Dont give a mic to fascists and extremists, they dont deserve freedom of speech
@trifulquita15 I can't tell if you're trying to be sarcastic, but in any case it's not about political correctness, or the censorship of free speech, because there is no such thing as absolute free-speech.
Noone has the right to opress or threaten other people, and they certainly should not expect any privileges with that kind of behaviour in a serious debate.
It's about common sense, modesty and respect - a person spewing death threats at the panel-members can expect a nice fat hitchslap.
@trifulquita15 I have to disagree, if only slightly -- I believe everybody is entitled to and deserve freedom of speech; I believe that fascists and extremists just aren't worth listening to.
This is out of context and one can barely hear what the guy is yelling. But it's great to find this from other places in context. The guy was clearly insane and even dangerous.
Really shows hitchens true colors. All he was ever interested in were his beliefs and ideals. One question was too much to ask.
I am entirely convinced that he was nothing but poison to this world. He would have destroyed the freedoms of science, religion and thought if given the chance.
@borgoff55 You have no idea how annoying it is to talk to religious zealots, and Hitchens had to deal with so many you can't even imagine. After a while it gets annoying, and after a while it just gets infuriating. It's a waste of time to deliberate with people who refuses to reason with logic and suspend their judgment - even for a moment. But of course, you're probably not going to listen to what I have to say because your mind is already made up.
@lugia3 Religious zealots? So thats how you describe those with faith in a god. Sounds a lot like you are the one who's mind is already made up. Atheism is a crutch and hitch used it until he died.
@borgoff55 Atheism a crutch?... Think of all the gods you do not believe in. Realize that you are atheist when it comes to those other gods. Now ask yourself "Is my atheism a crutch?".....in the end you and atheist(me included) have more in common than you think..Atheists, we just go one god further and that is your god.
@borgoff55 I use it to describe people whose faith in god overwhelms their love for other humans (and other religion & races) and their rationality in understanding forms of argumentative reasoning. So yes, if you have faith in god and refuses to reason your logic on why you believe in it, and are in fact "infatuated" with your god, then you're basically a zealot. Not all people of faith are zealots, but all zealots are people of faith.
@borgoff55 - How can not believing in something be a crutch? That is the most idiotic statement to date. Atheism is a lack of belief in something. you cannot use something you do not believe in as a crutch.
@borgoff55 perhaps if you knew that the man threatened all the panel with death you would understand why he was being asked to be removed- you dont give a platform for some fanatic to spew his death threats
@jazzr93 When did I compare Marxism with Fascism? My point was that Hitchens denounces a failed ideology (fascism) yet embraces another failed ideology (Marxism/Communism).. Both ideologies resulted in human suffering wherever implemented... This was my point
@OneWarmDragon When did I compare Marxism with Fascism? My point was that Hitchens denounces a failed ideology (fascism) yet embraces another failed ideology (Marxism/Communism).. Both ideologies resulted in human suffering wherever implemented... This was my point... What is your point with the childish insults?
Why was that bloke censored? Hitchens didn't "own" anyone. He was just arrogant and dismissive. He had to to go crying to security. It seems Hitchens has a bunch of sycophants around him worshipping him like a deity. How ironic.
@Cocolossal Please see 147's comment above: "This is out of context: earlier the man was screaming that Allah would kill Hitchens and all infidels" :-)
@mechanicmike69- Also, is it really necessary for me to point out the most glaring hypocrisy you espouse in feverishly demonstrate in your insistence on posting incoherent rants and spewing foul insults on my channel while pre-emptively blocking my comments and preventing me from posting any kind of response at all on your channel.... I guess it's 'my bad' that I failed to learn your sense of self-serving argumentation,close-mindedness, & moral dullness. Ciao
@crazymuffin147 I assure you the outburst that you describe certainly didn't take place in the full video of this panel. My take on Hitchens immediate dismissal of the questioner and the name of the full video can be found in my previous comments.
He's a stalker who spent seven weeks following Hitchens round the country shouting neo-fascist troofer bullshit at him, how many weeks would you put up with it for?
@asubjectiveopinion That has got to be one of the most elementary, dumbed down wikipedian definitions I have seen. Thanks for letting us know. I actually tried to boil down fascism in a way Americans could understand, knowing they aren't the smartest clique around on YT, but you took the crown.
"I actually tried to boil down fascism in a way Americans could understand, knowing they aren't the smartest clique around on YT, but you took the crown."
Short term memory letting you down? Have you considered aniracetam?
The continuing existence of the monarchy is a constant source of embarrassment to everyone in the UK. How can we live in the modern world with that clan of inbred parasites syphoning off millions in taxes every year?
@ElConesaToLoco You dont understand because you dont know,the Queen of England receives money from the civil list of around £15 million+ the Government pays other expenses which all total £38 million in 2010,but her fortune of over £8 billion is controlled by the UK treasury which earns over £200 million so she actually gives the state money,that's not including what tourism she attracts and the business she helps gain through her state visits.Google crown estates or civil list.
I am completely against Hitchens here. Unless I am out of context, if you are in a Q&A or debate type scenario where you are taking queries from the audience you need to be willing to hear EVERYONE. If you are not willing then you leave yourself open to suspicion. If you want a GOP type debate than you need to pay your friends to come and ask prewritten questions for you.
I think the term fascist is over used. Hitchen's intellectual hero in his youth, Trotsky, was denounced as a fascist by Moscow. Can we reserve the term for real fascists, not simply for people we don't like or disagree with?
@SurlytheCLown Because Hitchens said it. And if Hitchens shit on someones' face, there will be a herd of people who are religious about atheism clapping.
@edilsoncr1 Depends on who was shat on. Personally I'd clap if it was the Pope, who is responsible for the death of millions of Africans by telling them that condoms are more evil than AIDS.
@edilsoncr1 You think the only ones who follow Hitchens are atheists? I agree with most of what he has to say about organized religion, it's his view that we should follow the Bush "change the middle east by destroying it" plan that I never agreed with.
@SurlytheCLown No, I don't. Where did I say that? I also agree that organized religion is a gigantic problem and agree with you that the plan towards middle east is nonsense. I'm just saying that many people take Hitchens as some sort of super-hero and will blindly agree and clap and celebrate any piece of crap he says, be it stupid and childish disregarding or whatever it is. They just go "Oh, this Hitchens guy kicks ass! Haha!" and not think for a mere second about what he actually said.
Why would one want to just keep repeating and babbling on and on when it is self-evident the man you are asking is telling you to go away. You humiliate yourself and become rude.
Why doesn't somebody just grab him? Security came in and did the same thing that first guy with the blue shirt and white hat was doing......JUST STANDING THERE IN FRONT OF THE GUY. When the guy was told a hundred times NO then he just decided to leave. Why even have security if they aren't going to do anything?
@MrJaguarsenna Yes, how dare people take turns and be civil. Hitchens deserves torture for making people act like adults. /sarcasm for those too stupid to recognize it.
@MrJaguarsenna Dude, your a total moron. First of all, this heckler said what he wanted to say. He yelled what he wanted. No one stopped him from doing that.
And CH a Zionist? Seriously? Do you even know what a Zionist is?
@scottvska His sexual preferences are irrelivent. The man was thrown out for trying to bring up a subject that wasn't on the floor, and had already spoke and was trying to take the time given to others to speak. So whether or not he was a 'faggot' is completely null and void - he was RIGHT.
hitchens in hell shouting oh god pleaz get me back i will believe in you god will replay to him didnt us warn you, he will say you didnt give me prove?? , oh but others believed, you didnt.
@FarhanC99 hahaha you athiests have a failthy mouth when you respones , i just warn you, when you die you cant comeback, do you believe you come here for nothing is this world for nothing come on use your mind, this life is a test ,i will repet again and again if there is no god nothing will harm you but if there is god you will be in hell trouble think think tick tick
I'll ask you the same question..what if your wrong & Islam is the correct religion ?? The penalty for believing in Jesus's' divinity in Islam is eternal torture in hell.
Do you lose sleep over the possibility of burning in Muslim hell?? Tick tick...Realize that I don't fear this for the exact same reasons I don't fear the equally mythical Christian hell & I react the claim for the same reason you do. There isn't the slightest shred of evidence such a place exists.
Didn't realize you were Muslim so simply reverse my question. What if not believing Jesus was the son of god means you will be burned & tortured for eternity??
What kind of violent immoral monster would torture anything for eternity simply for not believing the right mythical stories about "him"
You worship an imaginary monster every bit as wicked as the equally fictional Satan.
@iwantyou9944 Poor logic. Why waste your life on a lie, in the hopes it'll give you favour from the lie? Why take one lie in, and reject other lies? Think for yourself, and stop threatening others. It doesn't make you big, impressive, respectworthy or intelligent. It makes you small, pathetic, weak and stupid.
@FarhanC99 god give brain to use it not beacuze i born with it you can chose which religion is the right one read it study it the think not setting playing like animal,search before the time is out anytime , why you fear hell fire if you obting god? god in quran he forfive all sins only who doesnt believe in him . tick tick
@iwantyou9944 im sure u were born a muslim and if u were born a christian u would be one till u die, there is no way of knowing the right god
god forgave all who dont believe i him? this just shows me this test is bullshit and ur god is petty
u can be the nicest person in the world but just cause u were born into the wrong religion u will go to hell, just for not sucking up to the one true god u will suffer forever, does that not show and petty your god is? if not ur brainwashed and have no hope
@iwantyou9944 Which God? Which one? Are all the Christians, Muslims and Jews in hell along with the Atheists because God is actually Mormon? You fucking idiot. A great man is dead, and soon you and I and everyone else will be dead also. But unlike him, your life will NOT BE MOURNED if you continue to be such a pathetic pile of filth. We'll be GLAD of it.
what was he trying to ask?
wowzerz1229 50 minutes ago
? What is the point of this video?
ultim4t32 9 hours ago
go away !
watsinyrwallet 2 days ago
Very unlike the Hitch to deny anyone the chance to embarrass themselves. This guy must have been a particularly nasty piece of work.
DancinJim 4 days ago
I don't understand, what was the bloke trying to say? I couldn't hear a thing, why didn't Hitchens wanna hear him?
MattMystrieo 4 days ago
And moreover not hitting it (the pentagon) in the center! I think any nutcase with an IQ of more than 45 can think that if u gonna crash a plane onto the pentagon to hurt US, then u better crash it at the center of it rather than the sides for more damage.
Add to this the fact that the FBI has constantly refused to release some 15+ footage taken by various sources near pentagon of the incident. U had think they would release them if it supported their official theory.
RadSMeshhy 5 days ago
Some questions that were never answered in the official 9/11 story:
1. Collapse of Tower-7.
2. Collapse of Tower-1 & 2 at free fall speeds. Conservation of momentum will tell u that this can't happen.
3. Pancake fashion collapse of all the 3 towers. Yet again science is against it.
4. Incredible maneuvering required to hit the pentagon. Pentagon is a "horizontal" building rather than a vertical one. U just can't maneuver a "15 ton" plane at 220 km/hr speed hitting the pentagon at the sides.
RadSMeshhy 5 days ago
@RadSMeshhy You're just rehashing lies that have been refuted countless times. Look at youtube video watch?v=qLShZOvxVe4 for example. Google "debunking 911" and prepare to be amazed.
WilbertK13 4 days ago
wait what did he say at the start? like how did they know he was a fascist crackpot :P
deanmullen10 6 days ago
apparently Brad Shoemaker was in the audience
Danyal123 1 week ago
@EvansClan11 It wasn't the topic of the debate and the moderator asked him to be quiet and the Hitch was just a little more forthright
Rockster969 1 week ago
So much for free speech and open discussion. Hitchens only tactic was name calling and suppression
Uncle99B 1 week ago
@Uncle99B and since it is hitchens event- he has every right to throw someone out especially if the person just previously threatened him with death
salvadory 1 week ago
@salvadory. I did not see the part where anyone threatens anyone else with death. Just that gasbag Hitchens refusing to listen to any views he does not like. Where in the video is the death threat made? And, if this guy allegedly made a death threat prior to the satrt of this video, why is he still at the meeting and not thrown out?
Uncle99B 1 week ago
@Uncle99B Have to say I agree with you here
mightywindmill102 1 week ago
@Uncle99B hitchens listened to views he didnt like and debated them all his adult life- it is reported this man interupted numerous times- shouting over other questioners and the talkers and threatening the panel that allah would take his revenge on them- by the point in this video they had enough! if you think Hitchens stifled views your nuts- he loved to destroy peoples views with logic and reason so its clear he had enough of the guy who was tossed out
salvadory 1 week ago
@salvadory. It is reported the guy did so and so? Where is the video showing this? Hitch listened to views he didn't like and debated them his whole adult life? All I see is his refusal to do just that. You make two assertions that are 180% opposite of what we see happening on this video.
Uncle99B 1 week ago
@Uncle99B well clearly you havent watched many hitchens videos so stop wasting your time with a "blowhard"- you obviously made up your mind off one video which shows how you think! as someone who watched hundreds of videos of hitchens on youtube i can safely say that if the guy was asked to leave it was for a good reason- as of the rest of the video i havent found it but im going by what was reported by other viewers and it makes sense since he doesnt have a history of censoring people
salvadory 1 week ago
@salvadory. That is correct. I made my judgement about this video based on what was on this video. As far as Hitchens in general, I have formed my opinion that he was a gasbag based on watching and listening to him for years
Uncle99B 1 week ago
@Uncle99B well atleast youre honest! if you want to see hitchens exercising extreme restraint watch his interview with white racist tom metzger on here- i would have punched the clown in the face but hitchens calmly let him talk
salvadory 1 week ago
@salvadory So he (allegedly) lets a white racist bigot speak but refuses to answer legit questions about 911. And this shows him in a positive light in your mind how?
Uncle99B 1 week ago
@Uncle99B he had to- it was a show on CNN(he was a guest host) ofcourse he mocked them and debated them but he also let them do all the damage to themselves with their own words - feel free to watch it- and as ive said its his book event and even the moderator is clearly letting the man know theyve had enough-!
salvadory 1 week ago
@Uncle99B It's not a legit question. The person trying to ask that question should not only be ignored in this type of assembly, but should be ridiculed relentlessly until they come to their senses. The question has been answered thousands of times, and it's clear it's just not the answer he wants to hear. He had an agenda and wanted his two minutes to spread his BS. Kudos to them for killing the mic and not letting him speak to the whole assembly.
tommy605 1 week ago
@tommy605. What was the question? It is not played on this version of the video
Uncle99B 1 week ago
@tommy605. Can you tell us what the question was and also the answer since you say it has been answered thousands of times? My bet is you cannot
Uncle99B 1 week ago
@Uncle99B The exact question, no. But the question was on 911, inside job, Bush's involvement. There were annotations in the video where you'll see a little of what he was saying. He didn't want an answer. He wanted to spread "awareness".
tommy605 1 week ago
@tommy605. The questioner noted that Al Qaeda did not schedule the war games that took NORAID out of the air on 911. A good point. Hitch pandered to the Zionist dupes. If there is one thing the Zionists do not believe in, it is free speech when it results in a challenge to their carefully crafted narrative. Hitch was an obnoxious puppet sold as an original, a maverick
Uncle99B 1 week ago
@Uncle99B Of course he was. Can't possibly be that 911 was carried out by cave dwellers that caught the US defense with their pants down and showed every person on the planet that the US is not beyond terrorism. Just as vulnerable as any other country. No one said there aren't questions left that we'd like to see answered, but that does NOT automatically make Bush and company involved or responsible. Most of your questions are answered, but they're just not the answers you want to hear.
tommy605 1 week ago
@tommy605 Err. Nobody is saying Bush was involved. We are just pointing out that Hitch does not wish to adrress the many fact about 911 that do not support the official narrative. You say you want answers to these questions but then support Hitch's sitting there like a little bitch saying 'go away, go away" when asked one.
Uncle99B 6 days ago
@Uncle99B So, you think that maybe somehow, Hitch has answers? That he is somehow privy to information from that day from..... the government? The terrorists? He has his opinions, that he got from the same sources most of us got ours from. He just understood them differently than the truthers and view those people as conspiracy nuts and he won't tolerate them using his time for their agenda
Yes, I am conditioned. To follow the evidence. It doesn't matter his specific question, It's been answered
tommy605 6 days ago
@tommy605. So you do not, or can not, admit that you do not know the question that was asked yet will nonetheless make the blanket statement it has been answered many times before?
Uncle99B 6 days ago
@Uncle99B "The exact question, no. But the question was on 911, inside job, Bush's involvement" This is a quote from my post the other day. I said I didn't know the exact question. But I have found the original posting of the video, and there was no question. Just him saying he wanted to ask just one question. (I thought I heard 911, but I could be mistaken)
And yes, over 10 years, the questions have been asked, and answered. There are no new questions. Even in 2007, no new questions.
tommy605 5 days ago
@tommy605. You don't know the question but claim it does not deserve answer? There are dozens of holes in the official story of 911 and none of them have been answered. His point was that NORAID was conveniently pulled out of the northeast corridor on 911 and so could not respond and that it surely was not Al Qaeda who did this. This cannot be refuted -- so Hitch and his fellow Zionist agents refuse to address it. Israel's fingerprints are all over 911; this cannot become public knowledge
Uncle99B 5 days ago
@Uncle99B No, it wasn't0 and this is an excellent example of a question that has been answered, but you just not liking the answer and choose to believe the one that fits your already biased belief. When all you look at is sites like standdown net, you will only hear one side of the story, and when you hear the real explanation, it's quote mined and misrepresented to show "gaps" or "lies" in the official story.
tommy605 5 days ago
@Uncle99B How about the FAA didn't notify the military until after the third plane crashed? There was no automated method for the civilian air traffic controllers to alert NORAD. Add to that that the hijackers turned off or disabled the onboard radar transponders making it next to impossible to id 1 plane from 4500 others in the same area. AND, NORAD interceptions were limited to offshore ADIZ at the time. No domestic intercepts.
There are answers, just not what you want to hear.
tommy605 5 days ago
@tommy605. What was the answer to the question about NORAID and the war games? You claim it was answered. What about the Israeli "art students" who had followed the alleged hijackers around for months? What about the Israelis stopped on GW Bridge with a car filled with explosives on 911? How about the Israelis seen filming and celebrating as the towers fell and who claimed they were there to document the event? What are all the excellent answers to these questions?
Uncle99B 5 days ago
@Uncle99B First, let's just get this out. Truthers are making the claim there was a conspiracy, and inside job, so it is their responsibility to provide that evidence. The fact the 99% of the evidence provided is easily answered or proved to be "manufactured" (through photoshop, after effects, etc) shows their case relies solely on the few remaining unanswered questions.
All your questions, are answered. Try looking on non truther sites. Look objectively. Or follow the truther source.
tommy605 5 days ago
@Uncle99B Look up the claims they make, then look at their source. Follow where that source got their information. Then follow that one. See what you find.
I don't expect you to change your views based on anything anyone says or provides evidence for. You have a predetermined biased outcome. "Zionist" seems to be your word of choice.
So what was the reason for this inside job? The war? To hide the insider trading? To remove freedoms? To ensure a re-election? All of the above?
tommy605 5 days ago
@tommy605. Surely you know the reasons the Zionist would pull yet another in a long line of false falg ops against the USA. You kep talking about evidence yet cannot answer one of the questions I have posed. You want an absurd conspriracy theory? How about several fanatical muslims, seen frequenting strip clubs (huh?), somehow get NORIAD to leave the skies open, successfully hijack 4 out of 4 airliners with boxcutters, and knock down three buildings in NYC by hitting 2 of them.
Uncle99B 5 days ago
@Uncle99B Blaming 'Zionists' is just conjecture.
BringBRToTheUK 1 day ago
@BringBRToTheUK. What about the Israeli "art students" who had followed the alleged hijackers around for months? What about the Israelis stopped on GW Bridge with a car filled with explosives on 911? How about the Israelis seen filming and celebrating as the towers fell and who claimed they were there to document the event? How about larry Silverstein and his son and daughter not showing up for work on 911?
Uncle99B 1 day ago
@tommy605 . You claim that all the questions I raised have been answered. Can you answer just one of them? How did those Israeli art students know to follow the alleged hi-jackers around? No answer? What was a truck filled with explosives and Israelis doing on the GW Bridge on 911? No answer? How did those Israelis know to be there to "document" (their word) 911? Still no answer?
Uncle99B 5 days ago
@tommy605. Then, for the first time in history of plane accidents on land, the balck boxes are never recovered. Nobody had any idea this was coming, yet by that afternoon it was already being pinned on Osama. And the very next morning the newspaper were filled with pictures of the alleged hi-jackers entering the planes in Logan and the media apparently had all the details even though nobody knew nothing 24 hours earlier. And that is the story you believe.
Uncle99B 5 days ago
@tommy605 That Uncle99B guys is soooo far of the rail that i would not bother man, i just checked is comment history, and its insane.
reznor12 1 week ago
@reznor12 Hahahaha. I should start checking history before I comment. Sometimes though, it's just fun to stir the pot a little. :)
tommy605 1 week ago
@tommy605. Notice how you do not know the question that was asked yet will nonetheless make the blanket statement is has been answered many time before? Do you not see this? Do you not see how you have been conditioned?
Uncle99B 6 days ago
Kind of ironic(i know it's not true irony but lack of a better word) that Hitchens own irrationality about smoking/drinking is what killed him.
ubermisogynist 1 week ago
@ubermisogynist How is having a fun time irrational? Should it be every mans aim to live to 80? Everyone dies just at different times and you can bet your ass that Hitchens had a good time when drunk and smoking and if having a good time is not the measure of a good life then I don't know what is.
Lulzalutioners 1 week ago
@Lulzalutioners he drank/smoked himself to death because he was unhappy..he was an alcoholic..just about every interview show i've seen him on he was drunk..on Bill Maher he actually had hard liquer on set with him..even Maher was like "WTF" .. all that hate towards people of faith..pointless..i know religious people and have them watch Maher shows/movies and Hitchens/Dawkins etc shows to see their reaction..guess what..they don't care..most say they feel sorry for them..
ubermisogynist 1 week ago
@ubermisogynist Haha you're so completely wrong. Have you read anything by him? I read his memoir Hitch 22 where he describes a lot of fun evenings with friends. You're actually just assuming the whole thing about him being drunk at shows. Maher was actually pretty happy with him, he was not "like WTF" as you eloquently put it. He did not hate people of faith he actually hated them when they started killing and interfering with his life and the life of others.
Lulzalutioners 1 week ago
Troofer?
89murph 1 week ago
lmao, good job hitchens!
ahmad18ny 2 weeks ago 2
Isn't the guy in red the actor from little giants????
jronzonb 2 weeks ago
Vive les nordiques !
MrPoilu 2 weeks ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
Join in on Debates at:
religiousdebates.co.uk
fletchernibiru 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Join in on Debates at:
religiousdebates.co.uk
YouTutorials0 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my Videos "Religion is ridiculous" (specifically christianity)...good stuff...rate it! Christians I CHALLENGE you to watch with an open mind. Atheists watch and if you like the videos then give thumbs up!!! Help spread the truth!!
gasmask4poop 3 weeks ago
these security guys should be fired, incredible incompetent.
ElzoSmid1 3 weeks ago
bad move. Never ever silence a person, even if he is a fascist crackpot give him the mic for a while, then u can say Go away.
We didnt hear what that man was saying. Is he a muslim? a christian? or maybe an atheist?
trifulquita15 3 weeks ago
@trifulquita15 "ive him the mic for a while" that had already happened.
ElzoSmid1 3 weeks ago
@trifulquita15 Like the top commenter wrote, he was yelling and screaming earlier on about how Allah was going to kill Hitchens and all infidels - Would you invite a neonazi to speak on a public discussion on equality and human rights? No.
porrsmurfen 3 weeks ago
no, i would not. Actually u are right. Sometimes i obey our politically correct system. I was wrong. Dont give a mic to fascists and extremists, they dont deserve freedom of speech
trifulquita15 3 weeks ago
@trifulquita15 I can't tell if you're trying to be sarcastic, but in any case it's not about political correctness, or the censorship of free speech, because there is no such thing as absolute free-speech.
Noone has the right to opress or threaten other people, and they certainly should not expect any privileges with that kind of behaviour in a serious debate.
It's about common sense, modesty and respect - a person spewing death threats at the panel-members can expect a nice fat hitchslap.
porrsmurfen 3 weeks ago 10
@porrsmurfen When did he threaten him with death? He didn't say anything as far as we can tell from this short clip.
BringBRToTheUK 1 day ago
@trifulquita15 I have to disagree, if only slightly -- I believe everybody is entitled to and deserve freedom of speech; I believe that fascists and extremists just aren't worth listening to.
2xnkote 1 week ago
dawkins debates much more sensibly than hitchens
arana001 3 weeks ago
@arana001 Hitchens is dead...
sharma19143 3 weeks ago
fuckin love the text box at 1:20 XD
JaCkMiChEaLs0n 3 weeks ago
Hitchens is most defiantly being a bit of a hypocrite here, I'd allow him to speak and and intellectually destroy him.
XpEAnUTBuTtERsUckSX 3 weeks ago
@XpEAnUTBuTtERsUckSX
You can't argue with these people, they are mental stumps that simply cannot be moved.
CloudMeetsSky 3 weeks ago
@XpEAnUTBuTtERsUckSX read the top comment
JaCkMiChEaLs0n 3 weeks ago
@JaCkMiChEaLs0n oh lol..........
XpEAnUTBuTtERsUckSX 3 weeks ago
This is out of context and one can barely hear what the guy is yelling. But it's great to find this from other places in context. The guy was clearly insane and even dangerous.
Mtaalas 3 weeks ago
hitchens was scared of him
associate39 3 weeks ago
@associate39 I would be too, nutjobs are scary people.
RoCk4LiFe90 3 weeks ago
@associate39 Are you that desperate?
Rockster969 1 week ago
Really shows hitchens true colors. All he was ever interested in were his beliefs and ideals. One question was too much to ask.
I am entirely convinced that he was nothing but poison to this world. He would have destroyed the freedoms of science, religion and thought if given the chance.
borgoff55 3 weeks ago
Read the top comment, my son :D
PappeH 3 weeks ago 18
@borgoff55 he done more for humanity than you ever will
lawndog6794 3 weeks ago
@borgoff55 You have no idea how annoying it is to talk to religious zealots, and Hitchens had to deal with so many you can't even imagine. After a while it gets annoying, and after a while it just gets infuriating. It's a waste of time to deliberate with people who refuses to reason with logic and suspend their judgment - even for a moment. But of course, you're probably not going to listen to what I have to say because your mind is already made up.
lugia3 3 weeks ago
@lugia3 Religious zealots? So thats how you describe those with faith in a god. Sounds a lot like you are the one who's mind is already made up. Atheism is a crutch and hitch used it until he died.
borgoff55 3 weeks ago
@borgoff55 Atheism a crutch?... Think of all the gods you do not believe in. Realize that you are atheist when it comes to those other gods. Now ask yourself "Is my atheism a crutch?".....in the end you and atheist(me included) have more in common than you think..Atheists, we just go one god further and that is your god.
cuevasdecamuy 3 weeks ago 11
@cuevasdecamuy Nicely said.
mrsthursday 3 weeks ago
@borgoff55 I use it to describe people whose faith in god overwhelms their love for other humans (and other religion & races) and their rationality in understanding forms of argumentative reasoning. So yes, if you have faith in god and refuses to reason your logic on why you believe in it, and are in fact "infatuated" with your god, then you're basically a zealot. Not all people of faith are zealots, but all zealots are people of faith.
lugia3 3 weeks ago
@borgoff55 - How can not believing in something be a crutch? That is the most idiotic statement to date. Atheism is a lack of belief in something. you cannot use something you do not believe in as a crutch.
WillShakespeare2007 2 weeks ago
@borgoff55 What nonsense. Hitchens was always a strong supporter of freedom of religion and thought (what the hell is freedom of science?).
Pinage 3 weeks ago
@borgoff55 perhaps if you knew that the man threatened all the panel with death you would understand why he was being asked to be removed- you dont give a platform for some fanatic to spew his death threats
salvadory 1 week ago
@borgoff55 You obviously have never heard hitchins then have you?
Hitchins is for rationality and is against despotism of any kind.
And religion has been an impediment to science and were it not for religion we'd have visited Mars by now for sure.
Rockster969 1 week ago
Security at a liberal function. Ha! "Please, oh please, won't you please leave?"
ranger1843 3 weeks ago
Funny.. He has calls someone a "Fascist crackpot" but was a self proclaimed Marxist... LOL!
imax1971 4 weeks ago
@imax1971 Hitchens carried a lot of water for the Bush administration in the run up to invading Iraq. Hitchens can't talk.
Antiks72 3 weeks ago
@imax1971 I think you need to be educated on the two ideologies. They're complete opposites.
jazzr93 3 weeks ago
@jazzr93 When did I compare Marxism with Fascism? My point was that Hitchens denounces a failed ideology (fascism) yet embraces another failed ideology (Marxism/Communism).. Both ideologies resulted in human suffering wherever implemented... This was my point
imax1971 3 weeks ago
@imax1971 I see, my apologies.
jazzr93 3 weeks ago
@jazzr93 No worries..
imax1971 3 weeks ago
@imax1971 funny... that you don't know the difference between fascism and marxism .
I'll bet you're one of those tea-bagging idiots that says Obama is a socialist, having no idea what socialism is.
OneWarmDragon 3 weeks ago
@OneWarmDragon When did I compare Marxism with Fascism? My point was that Hitchens denounces a failed ideology (fascism) yet embraces another failed ideology (Marxism/Communism).. Both ideologies resulted in human suffering wherever implemented... This was my point... What is your point with the childish insults?
imax1971 3 weeks ago
@imax1971 meaning of words FAIL!
Rockster969 1 week ago
Why was that bloke censored? Hitchens didn't "own" anyone. He was just arrogant and dismissive. He had to to go crying to security. It seems Hitchens has a bunch of sycophants around him worshipping him like a deity. How ironic.
Cocolossal 4 weeks ago
@Cocolossal Please see 147's comment above: "This is out of context: earlier the man was screaming that Allah would kill Hitchens and all infidels" :-)
elrjames777 3 weeks ago
what was the guy trying to say?
thedarknesscallingme 4 weeks ago
Because communists are so reasonable.
OldSchopenhauer 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mechanicmike69- Also, is it really necessary for me to point out the most glaring hypocrisy you espouse in feverishly demonstrate in your insistence on posting incoherent rants and spewing foul insults on my channel while pre-emptively blocking my comments and preventing me from posting any kind of response at all on your channel.... I guess it's 'my bad' that I failed to learn your sense of self-serving argumentation,close-mindedness, & moral dullness. Ciao
shieldsff 4 weeks ago
LMAO!!!!
MauricXe 4 weeks ago
This is out of context earlier the man was screaming that Allah would kill hitchens and all infidels
crazymuffin147 4 weeks ago 99
@crazymuffin147 I assure you the outburst that you describe certainly didn't take place in the full video of this panel. My take on Hitchens immediate dismissal of the questioner and the name of the full video can be found in my previous comments.
Playlisterism 3 weeks ago
@Playlisterism Where are your previous comments?
bewilderedkettle 3 weeks ago
Security on that none threathening guy, he has another opinion.
PjotrII 1 month ago
@PjotrII
He's a stalker who spent seven weeks following Hitchens round the country shouting neo-fascist troofer bullshit at him, how many weeks would you put up with it for?
asubjectiveopinion 1 month ago
Fascism is not allowing others to speak. Hitchens is in deep neurosis.
7amadloo 1 month ago
@7amadloo
No you're wrong, fascism is an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
Honestly, it's the internet, don't you use google?
asubjectiveopinion 1 month ago
@asubjectiveopinion That has got to be one of the most elementary, dumbed down wikipedian definitions I have seen. Thanks for letting us know. I actually tried to boil down fascism in a way Americans could understand, knowing they aren't the smartest clique around on YT, but you took the crown.
7amadloo 1 month ago
@7amadloo
That's all well and good Mr Xenophobe, but I'm not an American.
Nonetheless, please feel free to reduce me to whatever pre-defined idea of "the other" serves your personal ideology the best.
asubjectiveopinion 1 month ago
@asubjectiveopinion Nobody said you're American. Start reading, you talk too much. Xenophobe? Poor judgement, desperate measures. Move on lil guy.
7amadloo 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@7amadloo
"I actually tried to boil down fascism in a way Americans could understand, knowing they aren't the smartest clique around on YT, but you took the crown."
Short term memory letting you down? Have you considered aniracetam?
asubjectiveopinion 1 month ago
The continuing existence of the monarchy is a constant source of embarrassment to everyone in the UK. How can we live in the modern world with that clan of inbred parasites syphoning off millions in taxes every year?
We should have strung them up years ago.
asubjectiveopinion 1 month ago
@asubjectiveopinion
Same here is Spain. I just cannot understand how people is willing to pay them in exchange of....nothing.
ElConesaToLoco 1 month ago 2
@ElConesaToLoco You dont understand because you dont know,the Queen of England receives money from the civil list of around £15 million+ the Government pays other expenses which all total £38 million in 2010,but her fortune of over £8 billion is controlled by the UK treasury which earns over £200 million so she actually gives the state money,that's not including what tourism she attracts and the business she helps gain through her state visits.Google crown estates or civil list.
keir100 4 weeks ago
@keir100
Yes, but I was talking about the spanish crown, a useless piece of crap.
ElConesaToLoco 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ElConesaToLoco Sorry dude,even a useless piece of crap is better then Obama
keir100 4 weeks ago
I am completely against Hitchens here. Unless I am out of context, if you are in a Q&A or debate type scenario where you are taking queries from the audience you need to be willing to hear EVERYONE. If you are not willing then you leave yourself open to suspicion. If you want a GOP type debate than you need to pay your friends to come and ask prewritten questions for you.
14ByTheSword 1 month ago
@14ByTheSword I think we are missing the context here. Looks like here already had spoken and proven himself to be crazy and his turn was over.
middleCmusic 1 month ago
I think the term fascist is over used. Hitchen's intellectual hero in his youth, Trotsky, was denounced as a fascist by Moscow. Can we reserve the term for real fascists, not simply for people we don't like or disagree with?
joepeeler34 1 month ago
Bring back Oliver Cromwell.
chica476 1 month ago
Can someone explain this please? Cos I don't understand
Guichotpresident 1 month ago
This video's title must be one of trolling sarcasm or human idolatry, which is just as bad as religion itself
CrossCreed4800 1 month ago
How exactly does he "own" him? By saying "go away, can security get rid of this guy"? What a bunch of crap.
SurlytheCLown 1 month ago
@SurlytheCLown Because Hitchens said it. And if Hitchens shit on someones' face, there will be a herd of people who are religious about atheism clapping.
edilsoncr1 1 month ago
@edilsoncr1 Depends on who was shat on. Personally I'd clap if it was the Pope, who is responsible for the death of millions of Africans by telling them that condoms are more evil than AIDS.
hmspinaforethisisspa 1 month ago
@edilsoncr1 "religious about atheism"?? lol.
isaachaze1 1 month ago
@edilsoncr1 You think the only ones who follow Hitchens are atheists? I agree with most of what he has to say about organized religion, it's his view that we should follow the Bush "change the middle east by destroying it" plan that I never agreed with.
SurlytheCLown 1 month ago
@SurlytheCLown No, I don't. Where did I say that? I also agree that organized religion is a gigantic problem and agree with you that the plan towards middle east is nonsense. I'm just saying that many people take Hitchens as some sort of super-hero and will blindly agree and clap and celebrate any piece of crap he says, be it stupid and childish disregarding or whatever it is. They just go "Oh, this Hitchens guy kicks ass! Haha!" and not think for a mere second about what he actually said.
edilsoncr1 1 month ago
@edilsoncr1 Nope! Many folk like Hitchins but many totally disagree with his stance on Iraq.
So people can agree to differ but as regards many other things Hitchins is admired and respected, especially regarding religion and religious facism
Rockster969 1 week ago
What did he say?
pleaseoceancloud 1 month ago
What did the guy say?
Eralun 1 month ago
Why would one want to just keep repeating and babbling on and on when it is self-evident the man you are asking is telling you to go away. You humiliate yourself and become rude.
spiderboymax 1 month ago
Security... security please.
knowsis 1 month ago
Why doesn't somebody just grab him? Security came in and did the same thing that first guy with the blue shirt and white hat was doing......JUST STANDING THERE IN FRONT OF THE GUY. When the guy was told a hundred times NO then he just decided to leave. Why even have security if they aren't going to do anything?
Flipper79able 1 month ago
What did that guy say? I couldn't hear a word he said.
ocarina2boy 1 month ago
@ocarina2boy the guy said george bush destroyed the world trade centre and the us government is hiding aliens.
lynxasia1 1 month ago
@lynxasia1
Isn't that true though?
ocarina2boy 1 month ago
Religious people are such idiots.
xxxIronLeexxx 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
so much for Hitchens and free speech! own goal! hope that cancer was slow and real painfull you zionist whore!
MrJaguarsenna 1 month ago
@MrJaguarsenna Yes, how dare people take turns and be civil. Hitchens deserves torture for making people act like adults. /sarcasm for those too stupid to recognize it.
TheBetterGame 1 month ago
@MrJaguarsenna Dude, your a total moron. First of all, this heckler said what he wanted to say. He yelled what he wanted. No one stopped him from doing that.
And CH a Zionist? Seriously? Do you even know what a Zionist is?
PhazonInfuser 1 month ago
true, prince charles now cliams he is descended from mohammed (and Jesus too ) - who played away from home there ??????
iBeep2009 1 month ago
"...slobbering, chinless sympathizer of Islam...witless Dauphin.." LOL! RIP CH!
petrina1022 1 month ago
"No no no no no no no no," "we're not here to talk to you" LOL
Hitchens was a faggot.
scottvska 1 month ago
@scottvska His sexual preferences are irrelivent. The man was thrown out for trying to bring up a subject that wasn't on the floor, and had already spoke and was trying to take the time given to others to speak. So whether or not he was a 'faggot' is completely null and void - he was RIGHT.
andromidius 1 month ago
hitchens in hell shouting oh god pleaz get me back i will believe in you god will replay to him didnt us warn you, he will say you didnt give me prove?? , oh but others believed, you didnt.
time is out tick tick
iwantyou9944 1 month ago
@iwantyou9944 you are one sick motherfucker to think that off a dead man
and no one wants to hear ur sick fantasies of people suffering in eternity for not believing in the same fairy tales u do
FarhanC99 1 month ago
@FarhanC99 hahaha you athiests have a failthy mouth when you respones , i just warn you, when you die you cant comeback, do you believe you come here for nothing is this world for nothing come on use your mind, this life is a test ,i will repet again and again if there is no god nothing will harm you but if there is god you will be in hell trouble think think tick tick
iwantyou9944 1 month ago
@iwantyou9944
I'll ask you the same question..what if your wrong & Islam is the correct religion ?? The penalty for believing in Jesus's' divinity in Islam is eternal torture in hell.
Do you lose sleep over the possibility of burning in Muslim hell?? Tick tick...Realize that I don't fear this for the exact same reasons I don't fear the equally mythical Christian hell & I react the claim for the same reason you do. There isn't the slightest shred of evidence such a place exists.
RedlineMMA 1 month ago
@iwantyou9944
Didn't realize you were Muslim so simply reverse my question. What if not believing Jesus was the son of god means you will be burned & tortured for eternity??
What kind of violent immoral monster would torture anything for eternity simply for not believing the right mythical stories about "him"
You worship an imaginary monster every bit as wicked as the equally fictional Satan.
RedlineMMA 1 month ago
@iwantyou9944 Poor logic. Why waste your life on a lie, in the hopes it'll give you favour from the lie? Why take one lie in, and reject other lies? Think for yourself, and stop threatening others. It doesn't make you big, impressive, respectworthy or intelligent. It makes you small, pathetic, weak and stupid.
andromidius 1 month ago
@iwantyou9944 pascals wager, and argument that has been refuted many times
what if u chose the wrong religion?
as a person who doesnt believe in hell, i have nothing to fear while i live my life
but you fear hell, havnt u ever considered if ur in the wrong religion?
you will suffer painfully in the same hell you think christopher is in right now
the only reason u follow ur current religion is because u were born into it and were brainwashed, wake up
FarhanC99 1 month ago
@FarhanC99 god give brain to use it not beacuze i born with it you can chose which religion is the right one read it study it the think not setting playing like animal,search before the time is out anytime , why you fear hell fire if you obting god? god in quran he forfive all sins only who doesnt believe in him . tick tick
iwantyou9944 1 month ago
@iwantyou9944 hey, wasn't your prophet a pedophile? No need to be mean, just asking.
linkuei83 1 month ago
@iwantyou9944 im sure u were born a muslim and if u were born a christian u would be one till u die, there is no way of knowing the right god
god forgave all who dont believe i him? this just shows me this test is bullshit and ur god is petty
u can be the nicest person in the world but just cause u were born into the wrong religion u will go to hell, just for not sucking up to the one true god u will suffer forever, does that not show and petty your god is? if not ur brainwashed and have no hope
FarhanC99 1 month ago
kindergarten babble - are you perhaps sick in the head a tad? It would explain your inability for reasonable, sound thought.
sdmac21 1 month ago
@iwantyou9944 Well if life is a test, based on that, you just got an F.
Rockster969 1 week ago
@FarhanC99 Revering the dead is a religious custom.
scottvska 1 month ago
@iwantyou9944 Which God? Which one? Are all the Christians, Muslims and Jews in hell along with the Atheists because God is actually Mormon? You fucking idiot. A great man is dead, and soon you and I and everyone else will be dead also. But unlike him, your life will NOT BE MOURNED if you continue to be such a pathetic pile of filth. We'll be GLAD of it.
andromidius 1 month ago
@iwantyou9944 Typical Xtard cunt. So unchristlike!"
I love that home schooled touche you add to your inane cack.
Rockster969 1 week ago
Hitchens, what a slug.
ped200014 1 month ago
Hitchens demonstrating his intolerance.
JimmyMacJones 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hitchens finaly in hell