Best solution is: System "JR Protecting System" characterised by placing elastic air bags in the bottom part of the vehicle.Every air cushions is in the shape of unit having inside the gas release instantaneously operating,which is connected to the outer impact detectors through the central driver.
I feel quite safe in my Civic, but I would like the crumple zone to be longer. Hey firedemon, you like Mercedes and Volvo and stuff, right? Well, pity JD Power rates Mercedes, Volvo, Audi and BMW lower in reliability than Honda, Toyota, Acura and Lexus.
yeah dude hes right. hondas are rated of the highest in jd power. as well as safety. kind of why honda got 87? points for their vehicles in the past 10 years. next was toyota, with 85. and mercedes got 60-65 i think. something like that.
Acceptable? The Civic which is a lot lower than the STS. I though that since Cadillac was so luxurious, it was supposed to raise the bar in safety. But hey, it's from GM. And the pathetic rear crash test rating
GM SUCKS! they cant create shit. why does consumer reports, car and driver, and everyone else have honda rated better than ANY GM manufacturer by 15 points!!! the only thing good about gm is the h1 alpha.
give out my "opinion" these are facts.. and whether you realize it or not. I wrote something here before you, so why dont YOU go give out your "opinions" on some other video. because while you have opinions, i have facts. now because i cant give you a link to this, you actually spend 5 minutes and go searching.
@USFCARTWRIGHT YOU STUPID FUCK. Have you ever heard of Malibu, Silverado, or CTS? They're all award winners. Pick up a MOTORTREND magazine and learn to read with it.
@STIRKDAWG Look dipshit. I posted that Over two years ago. In fact almost 3. Back then the ONLY vehicle that was a top safety pick that you've cleverly listed for me was the Malibu, the CTS was acceptable for rear crashes back then. Obviously now things have changed, Honda is falling back, while GM is now tied for second with Ford as the safest auto manufacturer.. thats numbers wise, Even though Ford has something like Half the models that GM has.
This has been flagged as spam show
Best solution is: System "JR Protecting System" characterised by placing elastic air bags in the bottom part of the vehicle.Every air cushions is in the shape of unit having inside the gas release instantaneously operating,which is connected to the outer impact detectors through the central driver.
amazonGustav 2 months ago
the 2005-present Cadillac STS is assembled in
Lansing, Michigan, United States
Shanghai, China
Kaliningrad, Kaliningrad Oblast, Russia
Annihilator1111 10 months ago
Too bad the sts did even worse in the rear crash protection
AnimalCrossingCool4 1 year ago
i dont care what youre driving. a side impact is going to suck hard
counterclockwise123 1 year ago 4
I feel quite safe in my Civic, but I would like the crumple zone to be longer. Hey firedemon, you like Mercedes and Volvo and stuff, right? Well, pity JD Power rates Mercedes, Volvo, Audi and BMW lower in reliability than Honda, Toyota, Acura and Lexus.
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
well for your information, well umm LOL!
JoelEVO32 3 years ago
Go on, argue with facts
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
yeah dude hes right. hondas are rated of the highest in jd power. as well as safety. kind of why honda got 87? points for their vehicles in the past 10 years. next was toyota, with 85. and mercedes got 60-65 i think. something like that.
USFCARTWRIGHT 3 years ago 2
Ah ha, got the lowest score for the rear test
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
Acceptable? The Civic which is a lot lower than the STS. I though that since Cadillac was so luxurious, it was supposed to raise the bar in safety. But hey, it's from GM. And the pathetic rear crash test rating
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
ROFL, man, that gave me a good laugh. Why don't you look at the beginning of the video. See??
The Civic got the highest rating for all three IIHS tests and the Caddy got the second highest for the side and the lowest for the rear test
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
The Caddy (2008) got all "Good" ratings, and the Top Safety Pick.
GMminivans9968 3 years ago 5
Well, then, how is the Civic owned? The funny thing is, that while the smaller CTS is a TSP, the more upscale STS get quite poor ratings for 2008
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
At least "Acceptable" is still 2 levels away from being "Poor".
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
GM SUCKS! they cant create shit. why does consumer reports, car and driver, and everyone else have honda rated better than ANY GM manufacturer by 15 points!!! the only thing good about gm is the h1 alpha.
USFCARTWRIGHT 3 years ago
Give out your opinion somewhere else
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
give out my "opinion" these are facts.. and whether you realize it or not. I wrote something here before you, so why dont YOU go give out your "opinions" on some other video. because while you have opinions, i have facts. now because i cant give you a link to this, you actually spend 5 minutes and go searching.
USFCARTWRIGHT 3 years ago
That is your pure opinion.
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
Yeah, man, you're right. And JD Power rates Honda higher than most GM brands
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
@USFCARTWRIGHT YOU STUPID FUCK. Have you ever heard of Malibu, Silverado, or CTS? They're all award winners. Pick up a MOTORTREND magazine and learn to read with it.
STIRKDAWG 1 year ago
@STIRKDAWG Look dipshit. I posted that Over two years ago. In fact almost 3. Back then the ONLY vehicle that was a top safety pick that you've cleverly listed for me was the Malibu, the CTS was acceptable for rear crashes back then. Obviously now things have changed, Honda is falling back, while GM is now tied for second with Ford as the safest auto manufacturer.. thats numbers wise, Even though Ford has something like Half the models that GM has.
USFCARTWRIGHT 1 year ago
btw, what GM SUV competes with the CR-V?
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
Wow
Degrassi123 3 years ago