Added: 3 years ago
From: swiftvoters
Views: 1,520
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • CAN YOU PLEASE MAKE A VIDEO ABOUT OBAMAS BIRTH PLACE "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

  • CAN YOU PLEASE MAKE A VIDEO ABOUT OBAMAS BIRTH PLACE "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

  • CAN YOU PLEASE MAKE A VIDEO ABOUT OBAMAS BIRTH PLACE "CONSPIRACY THEORY"

  • i love the quotations

  • hmmmm thats an interesting point so let me get this straight one desperate play by McCain and Obama the empty suit goes down LOL

  • google - Alaska be More at Home in Russia

  • McCain dug his own grave. It's now Palin/McCain rather than McCain/Palin. He's now the bottom of the ticket. So pathetic. But Palin's also about to implode. Palin has yet to give an interview. She's afraid to take on the tough questions. Check SarahPalinExposed for all the info on Sarah Palin. She's going down.

  • no one questions a regular working mom on if she can raise her kids. why question her. and it seems funny that everyone is bashing her for being a rupublican woman. begining to think its ok for a woman to be VP or president, as long as she has the same ideals as hilary, or nancy pelosi.

  • im trigs daddy

  • Way to cover up your daughters teen pregnancy. I'm so sorry bristol. You should take your baby and move to Alaska, I mean Florida.

  • Don't use Sexism as an excuse of being ignorant on what is happenning here. As a woman, I find it funny that when we "ridicule" a woman like we would a man, we are accused as being sexist?? Isn't the whole point that we want to be treated the same (whether it be fair or not fair). Do you think Sarah Palin can cry "sexism" when Osama Bin Laden Attacks America as her defense.

  • Ok, this is SO SEXIST

    I hate Ms Palin too, but "Who will take care of her children?" ARE YOU KIDDING ME? She has a husband to take care of them! So no women in the white house for you then????

  • Rowena, first of all - I am a woman. Second, the idea that she represents family values, and will have to abandon her newborn to campaign I believe is a valid point. Especially since she prides herself on telling me (as a woman) what choices I can make. So fair is fair. If she wants to pry into my life and my choices, than I can ridicule her choice. That family needs a mother, and not a VP Candidate on the weekends.

  • If she were a man no one would give a shit about her having a small baby.

    Yes, her ideals are sexist and wrong, but that doesn't mean YOU are excused if you are sexist.

    I'm a Clinton supporter too, and I think she undermines what Clinton did too, but use her policies against her, don't become a sexist jerk like the medias

  • FYI, I was a Clinton Supporter. And I also feel that she undermines (and to some degree insults) what Clinton did. Clinton earned her 18M votes, and understood voters - she wasn't appointed by a desperate Candidate making a decision based on polls and election data - and not thinking of the safety of my children.

  • Republican meant something different back then...

    Frederick Douglass would not, for example, have voted in the retard we've got in now.

  • "Back then..."

    Oh, I suppose that would apply to the Constitution, and the Emancipation Proclamation, Jom Crow Law, etc. since they were written "back then"

    Frederick Douglass (c. 1817--95)

    I am a Republican, a black, dyed in the wool Republican, and I never intend to belong to any other party than the party of freedom and progress.

  • Actually, I'm a little confused. Your comment seems to imply that Jim Crow was a good thing. Are you arguing for or against the Republican?

  • No, of course I don't mean it as a good thing, I mean it was a legitimate document that today is either a good or bad thing but still has the same relevance to the way decent people feel. The Jim Crow Law was a bad thing. It was oppression of a people. But people are as against it today as they were then. Who cares if it was "back then"?

  • It seems that a lot of the same values are shared by Christian blacks and Republicans. Can somebody explain to me why blacks didn't rally for Rice or the ever peace-seeking Powell? I mean wouldn't it be to the benefit of black power to be able to choose and consider either party? It seems unfair that Black Christians would have to vote Pro-choice, and I don't want to say, but go against many other "moral" values they share with the Republicans. I'm just saying...2 parties is better than 1.

  • I mean wouldn't it be a better strategy to care about being represented by both parties? Do you think in the future blacks will have more than 1 party to vote for? My comic friend in Miami tells a joke, it goes like this, "If you black and proud, clap it up...If you black, white & proud clap it up! That's an Obama joke in case nobody got it!

  • In this country we can vote for who ever we want. I do not look at race, if the person is qualified and consider that person ready to lead and that person has my core values then I will vote for them. Man or woman, black or white, christian or non.

  • Great, so you're keeping an open mind or you already made up your mind? Just want to find out if you stand by your word.

  • Great video! This woman is NO Hillary Clinton and for her to try to make parallels between her and Hillary are selfish and mis-leading. There was a video out about how she felt Hillary was whining about the unfair treatment during the Presidency and how she should work harder...THE WOMAN RAN FOR PRESIDENT! This move in McCain's part was calculated and manipulative. Congrats people this is who is a heartbeat away from the Oval Office! This is not a game!

  • Great Video. Dead Right.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more