You are correct. Ethanol would never survive without the subsidies and loan guarantees. I would prefer that the Dept. of Energy be shut down and the gov't get out of the energy subsidy business altogether.
And your a typical conservative running around the question but never giving a direct answer. And you never provided me with anything except a bunch of URL's that go nowhere. Professor Enigma? Come on. Your arguments have as much substance as you videos have pictures.
It seems you only accept sources that prove your point no matter how wrong they are. For this reason you are a lost cause. And you never answered my last post. You never proved that Carter and Clinton cut oil production.
If a refinery has to shut down for repairs how is that the presidents fault? Every business has to shut something down for repairs at one time or another.
I looked up your professor enigma. This guy is way too far to the right to believe anything he has to say. Do you have a more mainstream source I can check?
Demand for energy will continue to rise, if we don't find more energy, prices will rise.
Therefore, when envirokooks block construction of new oil refineries, block drilling in ANWR, expand drilling in the Gulf, drilling for shale oil, or drilling the OCS, that will affect everyone.
I referenced all my material in my big oil article, you're welcome to try to dispute it.
I don't accept the premise of your "mainstream" argument.
How does blocking drilling and the building of refineries lower present production? If I make 100 cars a year and someone stops me from making an additional 25, I can still make 100. Just not 125.
You keep trying to steer me into a conversation on ethanol being a money hole. And about Carter and Clinton decreasing refining capacity. These are not subjects I was addressing. But OK. Tell me where to find the info on ethanol being a money hole and tell me how a president controls oil production of a private business.
You mentioned Carter and so did I in this video. I deleted one of your unnecessary blatherings, you know what I'm talking about.
So, do you have anything to say about how much of a money hole ethanol is or the fact that domestic refining capacity declined under Carter and Clinton, as well as imports of oil?
The 97-01 comments were allusions to your blathering about the shipping of jobs overseas on my channel page kid.
Clinton's best years had massive increases in imports, as well as trade en masse and an avg. of 45K jobs/month were outsourced from 97-01.
But the unemployment rate got under 4%. Perhaps you should consider that trade creates jobs and when jobs are shipped overseas, some jobs are created here.
SImple concept, too bad you haven't looked at the facts.
Oh and by the way, Jimmy Carter was trying to get us off of foreign oil and give jobs to americans. Your republican savior gave money to big oil and sent our jobs to foreign countrys.
I already refuted your nonsense about the outsourcing of jobs on my channel comments. The period 1997-01 saw more jobs go overseas every month than 2002-AUG05, yet the unemployment rate went under 4% under Clinton and IMPORTS increased markedly.
We all know you're generalizing because you have no hard data, only talking points. Good try though.
I'm from Iowa. Tom Vilsack (The Ballsack) is even from my home town. Obama won over voters in Iowa.
Can't exactly say my state is a bastion of conservatism.
And yes, there's a prolific abundance of ethanol pumps there.
QuartuvLarry 1 year ago
You are correct. Ethanol would never survive without the subsidies and loan guarantees. I would prefer that the Dept. of Energy be shut down and the gov't get out of the energy subsidy business altogether.
UTubekookdetector 1 year ago
And your a typical conservative running around the question but never giving a direct answer. And you never provided me with anything except a bunch of URL's that go nowhere. Professor Enigma? Come on. Your arguments have as much substance as you videos have pictures.
fargenacle 2 years ago
It's in my "Democrats are responsible for high energy prices" on the left side of my channel.
You're stalling now Fart, it's obvious. You're the equivalent of a red-light district talking head.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
It seems you only accept sources that prove your point no matter how wrong they are. For this reason you are a lost cause. And you never answered my last post. You never proved that Carter and Clinton cut oil production.
fargenacle 2 years ago
The Energy Information Administration has the figures, I already provided you with an article going over these figures.
Fart, I don't think you know much about what you talk about. You're the typical liberal generalizing and blathering to anyone that will listen.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
If a refinery has to shut down for repairs how is that the presidents fault? Every business has to shut something down for repairs at one time or another.
I looked up your professor enigma. This guy is way too far to the right to believe anything he has to say. Do you have a more mainstream source I can check?
fargenacle 2 years ago
I reference all my material Fart, I doubt you do.
Demand for energy will continue to rise, if we don't find more energy, prices will rise.
Therefore, when envirokooks block construction of new oil refineries, block drilling in ANWR, expand drilling in the Gulf, drilling for shale oil, or drilling the OCS, that will affect everyone.
I referenced all my material in my big oil article, you're welcome to try to dispute it.
I don't accept the premise of your "mainstream" argument.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
How does blocking drilling and the building of refineries lower present production? If I make 100 cars a year and someone stops me from making an additional 25, I can still make 100. Just not 125.
fargenacle 2 years ago
Do you think oil refineries never go offline for proactive/reactive repairs? Do you think oil refineries never peter out?
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
You keep trying to steer me into a conversation on ethanol being a money hole. And about Carter and Clinton decreasing refining capacity. These are not subjects I was addressing. But OK. Tell me where to find the info on ethanol being a money hole and tell me how a president controls oil production of a private business.
fargenacle 2 years ago
You are addressing these subjects kiddo, you mentioned Carter trying to get us off foreign oil, ethanol was one of the facets of his diotic scheme.
I can tell you're getting uncomfortable with this. I already gave you a place you can find out about ethanol, are you dumb?
freewebsDOTcom/professor_enigma/globalwarming4DOThtm
My info on refining capacity declining comes from the Energy Information Administration at freewebsDOTcom/professor_enigma/bigoilDOThtm
I did post these once
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
A president and their Congress can lower refining capacity by blocking any construction of any new oil refineries, blocking drilling in ANWR, etc.
You really never considered this?
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
If you wish to engage in a conversation, you must first stop deleting my comments. Carter wasn't president from 97 to 01.
fargenacle 2 years ago
You mentioned Carter and so did I in this video. I deleted one of your unnecessary blatherings, you know what I'm talking about.
So, do you have anything to say about how much of a money hole ethanol is or the fact that domestic refining capacity declined under Carter and Clinton, as well as imports of oil?
Your free trade rant was silly too.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
The 97-01 comments were allusions to your blathering about the shipping of jobs overseas on my channel page kid.
Clinton's best years had massive increases in imports, as well as trade en masse and an avg. of 45K jobs/month were outsourced from 97-01.
But the unemployment rate got under 4%. Perhaps you should consider that trade creates jobs and when jobs are shipped overseas, some jobs are created here.
SImple concept, too bad you haven't looked at the facts.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
Your reply is not showing up on my screen UT, but yes I'd agree that guy(?) is certainly worthy of bein immortalized in the kook hall of fame.
I vote to enshrine him.
sorrian 2 years ago
Farternacle will make a great addition to Kook Central.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
Oh and by the way, Jimmy Carter was trying to get us off of foreign oil and give jobs to americans. Your republican savior gave money to big oil and sent our jobs to foreign countrys.
fargenacle 2 years ago
Greetings Fart,
ny..frb..org.research/current_issues/ci11-8..pdf
I already refuted your nonsense about the outsourcing of jobs on my channel comments. The period 1997-01 saw more jobs go overseas every month than 2002-AUG05, yet the unemployment rate went under 4% under Clinton and IMPORTS increased markedly.
We all know you're generalizing because you have no hard data, only talking points. Good try though.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
As far as ethanol, I can tell you've done no research in this area either. It's a money hole and would not survive without massive subsidies.
freewebs..com/professor_enigma/globalwarming4..htm
In addition, during Carter and Clinton our domestic refining capacity diminished and our imports of OIL went way up.
Please do some cursory research kiddo.
freewebs..com/professor_enigma/bigoil..htm
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago
mccainisthrough is a phony nut that can't even get his facts straight.
3slimdog 2 years ago
i laugh at that dude all the time but this is just hilarious.
jeremyoyer 2 years ago
great video, dems never realize how dumb they actually are.
bulldogs3159 2 years ago
mccainisthrough is an idiot. I wouldn't worry yourself with them too much. The more they run their mouth the better it gets for conservatives.
sorrian 2 years ago
Oh, we're not worried about this phoney. But you're right, the more videos she does, the bigger hole she digs herself.
UTubekookdetector 2 years ago