thats because our owners shipped off our cap to sell the fucking team. were in a rebuilding process. its not like were gonna instantly make the playoffs. historically, the blues are great team. compared to the predators, blues are a lot better. and theyre one point behind the predators. so i dont see what makes them so terrible. plus the injuries, which is an often used excuse, but it has to come in play with the amount we have.
oh yeah cause its a disputed goal it automatically means were bitching about a loss you fucking twat. blues are a great team. predators blow fat cock.
eh, this argument doesnt really matter considering how the blues leapfrogged the preds to make it to 6th seed and preds left empty handed. even though we still got swept.
Its impossible to tell simply because where you might see white if it did cross the line, part of the mesh in the net is covering it. I have zoomed in a couple times and its impossible to tell if the white is mesh or ice.
Not conclusive if entire puck (not even "just 99%") is across the line, so ruling on ice stands: no goal. As close as you can possibly get without it being conclusive one way or the other. If the ref had called "goal", it probably would have stood up to review, too.
gol jak cip!!
Sokolik107 1 year ago
are they blind
cicaskater95 1 year ago
jesný gól...tady není sporu! a pak,je to náš Martin..ať žije ČR.hihi
zlodejcasu 1 year ago
@zlodejcasu no jasně..:D byl to gól..nechápu co tam tak dlouho řešili..dementi..:D
ludmisek 1 year ago
That was in! Blues got robbed.
snowcloud 2 years ago
No goal.
SillyEagle1992 2 years ago
Yes, Goal
prosa45 2 years ago 6
no goal --
breakoutrulz 2 years ago
gol jak cip
Sokolik107 1 year ago
If Rucinsky didnt suck so bad he wouldnt put it right into masons pad. Glad hes gone. NO GOAL!
jet926 2 years ago
Comment removed
jet926 2 years ago
thats imo in
Cabelzz 2 years ago
it was in, thats my opinion. i think the entire puck was definitely in the net.
peterabott 3 years ago
i hav to disagree like tennis even if the ball just knicks the line its in in hockey that was no goal
breakoutrulz 2 years ago
@peterabott What's up with "in my opinion"? This is not an opinion thing.
SillyEagle1992 2 years ago
thats because our owners shipped off our cap to sell the fucking team. were in a rebuilding process. its not like were gonna instantly make the playoffs. historically, the blues are great team. compared to the predators, blues are a lot better. and theyre one point behind the predators. so i dont see what makes them so terrible. plus the injuries, which is an often used excuse, but it has to come in play with the amount we have.
alivingman 3 years ago
oh yeah cause its a disputed goal it automatically means were bitching about a loss you fucking twat. blues are a great team. predators blow fat cock.
alivingman 3 years ago
no way you do
andysick 3 years ago
eh, this argument doesnt really matter considering how the blues leapfrogged the preds to make it to 6th seed and preds left empty handed. even though we still got swept.
alivingman 2 years ago
NO GOAL!
kafhney 3 years ago
dosnt Mason play for the Blues??
uaman11 3 years ago
no mason plays for the Preds.
celticbhoys09 3 years ago
Chris Mason plays 4 the Blues. check the Blues's site!!!!
uaman11 3 years ago
when did he get traded?
celticbhoys09 3 years ago
on the site, it says "acquired from Nashville in exchange for a forth round pick in 2008 Entry Draft on June 6,2008" so he did play for Nashville
uaman11 3 years ago
Ya the Blues picked up Mason in the summer, the Preds moved him to make room for Rinne. Plus Ellis outplayed Mason last year in Nashville
antropov80 2 years ago
even if it went in, the puck went backwards first. it can't stop it's forward motion. no goal. on a break away, maybe, but not shootout
wahrheitverdad 3 years ago
deffently no goal
handypot35 3 years ago
the comentator is a fuckin idiot. is he blind.
daryl3161 3 years ago
thats clear goal...
radim4t0rCZ 3 years ago
that was a goal! this was similare goal to the sens vs pens shootout
Madhouse2332 3 years ago
goal
dyskietka71 3 years ago
Federko is such a moron. That's clearly a goal.
Darknessking81 3 years ago
"Yeah thats it!"
"i dont know..."
HAHAH
ShiftStyle 3 years ago
no goal b/c the whole puck didn't go over the line.
thathockeydude37 3 years ago
HOW COULD HE NOT KNOW?
vezom 3 years ago
thats a goal no doubt about it
McLovin454 3 years ago
hey guess who refed...McGeough lol
sgarak 4 years ago
thats a goal
dizeestl 4 years ago
goal
gosabresgo99 4 years ago 5
i listened to this game . the conclusion was no goal because the foward momenum of the puck was stopped. the fact that it went in didn't matter.
unsuspendpac 4 years ago
Wow, that is close, but its not a goal
Islanders1932 4 years ago
Its impossible to tell simply because where you might see white if it did cross the line, part of the mesh in the net is covering it. I have zoomed in a couple times and its impossible to tell if the white is mesh or ice.
CanadaMMA 4 years ago
it's a goal, nice deke, rucinksy
hockeydude1993 4 years ago
no goal, its like the closest to a goal as i ever seen but o well
DustyDinkleman26 4 years ago
Not conclusive if entire puck (not even "just 99%") is across the line, so ruling on ice stands: no goal. As close as you can possibly get without it being conclusive one way or the other. If the ref had called "goal", it probably would have stood up to review, too.
carpandean 4 years ago
goal
TriCounty33 4 years ago
are you frickin kidding me goal all the way hahahaha oh my gash how can they not callthat a goal go blues preds suck dick pc eout
jaxonhockey42 4 years ago
No goal
Hoodieman36 4 years ago
no, that wasn't a goal!
hincapie003 4 years ago
goal...100%
hasek393939 4 years ago
it's goal
TetaJane 4 years ago
its a goal. u probable dont see white cuz its so thin and maybe the pucks/pads shadow covers it jackass. its a goal blues win preds suck it
trampdonkey2 5 years ago
no goal, theres no white ice in-between the puck and red line
predsvokoun29 5 years ago
goal
spartanhockey409 5 years ago