Added: 3 years ago
From: donylee
Views: 41,015
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (255)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this dude raps fast

  • I Love The Video Welcome to GussianMath's module on Quantum Mechanics It Can Increase My Knowledge

  • Nice Video Welcome to GussianMath's module on Quantum Mechanic That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You

  • I Really Like The Video Welcome to GussianMath's module on Quantum Mechanics From Your

  • Your Video Welcome to GussianMath's module on Quantum Mechanics Is Very Useful Sharing

  • Calm down !!

  • the term for this human is "Cantinflas"

    please check with mexican curios!!

  • how the hell do yall asians get so smart ):

  • pls stop dancing the whole time:D

  • you are a quality teacher mate!!

    

  • ah, yea. Can you realy get a job with this shit? I can talk fast to and would like a job.

  • @wcshearon1

    Yes!

  • @ephipi Thx, i got a good laph out of all this and i think i learned somthing to. I think.

  • @majidchabat No - he's standing on the shoulders of the true geniuses - those who developed QM..

  • Could the difference between quantum and classical physics be because quantum physics represents the passage of time itself?

    This theory is based on just two postulates

    1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function represents the forward passage of time itself

    2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event

  • He's cute...

  • this Guy Is Awsome..i want to know about him more..

  • who is this guy??

  • thankx

  • If you put this video on mute, then play a rap video (say Eminem) over this. It works perfectly, his hand movements are worthy of bling!

  • @murchie85

    I should also say, its a very good lecture though!

  • @murchie85 I can´t stop laughing !!!!!!!

  • Classic

  • Comment removed

  • Animation, hand waving, fancy terms and formulas do not adequately explain Quantum Mechanics to the lay person . Unfortunately, many people in the Maths and Physics do just that. The REAL question that the layman wants answered is that if I have paper and pencil what knowledge can I get , about an atom, using Quantum Mechanics. I think it's like calculus; maybe we should start with PRACTICAL uses and work backwards to the formulas.

  • this guy is really hot- I wish he would tutor me privately...

  • Hi. If I want to learn about quantum mechanics, what math/physics classes should I take? thanks.

  • @NobbyKNobbs You NEED to know Linear Algebra/Matrix Theory, multi variable calculus such as partial differentiation, solving partial differential equations and simple ODEs. This plus classical mechanics up to things such as lagrangians and classical probabilities. If you want to go much beyond that to relativistic QM then you need to know general relativity (but thats pretty far into QM).

  • great, particle moves in space only, time is only numerical order of its motion

  • He's psychotic. He's making a lot of noise without explaining anything. He's very loud and shrill. Calm down, stop talking with a lot of filler and focus on a one dimensional problem and solve it.

  • Hyperinfinity collapsed the quantum wave funtion not the observer and you dont have to be a genius to realise that.Illuminati is blurring ur math people.....connect the dots it all lies in plain sight.

  • The idea that light moves the atom around is sketchy.... I thought that Planks constant is responsible for the probabilistic nature of the quantum reality

  • Not bad

  • @floopsie666, learn more about QP

  • Comment removed

  • I study meteorology and pure physics ..and your vids help me A LOT!!!

    THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!! :D

  • peter chao >?

  • Statement that Quantum Mechanics is science of microcopic world is absolutely misleading...

  • @dyah260179 not at all

  • @floopsie666 You should learn more Quantum Physics

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, & given what I said below, we r back to atoms & electrons, NOT quantum mechanics, because it is atoms that coalesced into life forms NOT quantum effects. Therefore as the body evolved, consciousness evolved, too. We evolved ears, & we evolved the conscious experience of hearing, which didn't exist before. This ALL must occur at the atomic level and above - or, at least, the essential nature of the experience must, but this doesn't seem likely, so evolution has a problem.

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, u can't treat consciousness as just another phenomenon, as an emergent property, or whatever.

    If the body evolved, then conscious experience has to fit in with the story of evolution. You have to explain why you see colors & images, as opposed to feeling them. You have to explain why you hear sounds as opposed to tasting them. You have to consider conscious experiences that were rejected by evolution, etc. All this has to be explained coherently, so, too, the sense of self.

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, you say that consciousness is just another phenomenon. No, it is not. Like "God", it cannot be seen, located, analysed, detected, dissected, or decomposed. According to ALL physical theories, there is NO SUCH THING as consciousness - it just doesn't exist, just as "God" doesn't exist.

    Houston, we have a problem. Just ignore it, you say, consciousness is of NO SIGNIFICANCE.

    I smell an agenda. Would anyone truly scientifically-minded ignore, say, the effects of gravity?

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, Albert Einstein said science will NEVER explain conscious experience. Are you seriously telling me that Einstein couldn't see the obvious - couldn't see what you claim to see?

    Atheists have destroyed the debate on consciousness through such sophisticated tactics as bullying and lying. Too many atheists, unfortunately, resemble politicians.

  • @jakeZaks2012 there are times when i get annoyed at how many pretentious youtube atheists there are. then i see retards like you and I thank them for their existence.

  • *PhD

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, THIS IS WHAT YOU WROTE in reply to my first, perfectly reasonable and civilized posts: "If you don't like physics, bugger off to another video."

    Now, please tell me, Mr Nice Guy, where I wrote that I disliked physics.

    The fact that you make things up shows that you are unscientific, illogical (making inferences from non-existent premises) and irrational.

    If you're studying for a Phd, I'm the Queen of England!

  • @WarpFieldTheorist:

    Religious person: "God" said let there be light and there was.

    Atheist: Nature said let their be light, and there was.

    Tell me the difference between the two statements? I see no difference except a philosophical one. Whereas religious people say some "thing" created all this, you and others claim "nature" did. Either way, you both believe in the supernatural - things just materializing out of nothing and nowhere.

  • @jakeZaks2012 who said Nothingness was unnatural?

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, PLEASE ENLIGHTEN ME AND EVERYONE ELSE.

    Atoms and electrons are not what neurons and the brain are made from - is that right?

    Neuroscientists don't try to understand consciousness in terms of neuron behavior, is that right? Of course, there are molecules, but they are made of atoms.

    Please tell me and everyone else what I got so terribly wrong.

    Or are you one of those who propose quantum entanglement and Bose-Einstein condensate as a explanation for consciousness?

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, your problem is you mistake mathematics and equations for reality. You think physicists know something about reality that ordinary people don't.

    Ask a physicist how something exists, moves, what space & energy is, how light gets to its destination. They don't know.

    If an electron approaches the speed of light, light still travels at the speed of light.

    They know less about reality than ever before. Equations DO NOT explain reality, they merely predict outcomes.

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, you don't believe in the supernatural. You clearly haven't read up on quantum theory or general relativity, you clearly don't understand how bizarre "reality" now looks.

    You do, however, believe in MIRACLES that make those performed by Jesus Christ look like party tricks.

    You just accept everything exists, created itself for no reason, and upholds its own existence by itself for no reason. And you believe that you're just matter and don't exist, but then act like you do.

  • ANYONE WHO WANTS TO ATTACK ME, READ MY FIRST COMMENTS ON HERE.

    I'M SICK OF THE IDIOTS ON YOUTUBE WHO MISREAD, MISINTERPRET, ASSUME, AND THEN ABUSE.

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, no scientist with an "atheist" agenda is going to tell me that I don't exist, that I'm just matter, and my conscious existence is all an illusion. Such a scientists presents no evidence, just his personal belief, and that is NOT science.

    Fine, then let me torture you, make you suffer, let me kill ur family - y don't u put your life where your mouth is? If you're just matter, what's the problem?

    You deny consciousness, then act like it exists, like YOU exist - which is it?

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, GET IT INTO YOUR THICK SKULL - the only reason we know consciousness exists is because we can speak and say so, otherwise scientists would have said there is no such thing.

    Scientists once said dogs weren't conscious, didn't feel pain, so learned men tortured dogs in front of women and laughed at their reaction.

    Scientists have been WRONG time and time again when it comes to life forms. They said animals were mere beasts, now we know animals have individual personalities.

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, STOP BEING SO BLOODY ARROGANT. You're another Einstein are you?

    You need to wake up to how ignorant you are - maybe then you'll stop insulting others and being so patronizing.

    SUPERNATURAL? You love these words because you think it makes you intelligent.

    Consciousness is being dismissed, we are told it's an "illusion", not real, we just think it's real - very convenient for "atheists" who have an agenda to prove everything is the result of the interaction of matter.

  • @jakeZaks2012 Its can be a bitch when we are being controlled by any illusive agent to any concept of destiny'

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, you can devise as many complex equations as you want, but what this complex mathematical analysis does is to try to understand interactions between PARTICLES. The particles, themselves, don't do maths - we do! - so that we can predict what THEY are going to do.

    It IS that simple. The electromagnetic force is mediated by virtual photons, more particles. None of this can explain consciousness, however complex you make the "game".

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, you and another chatter attacked me for NO REASON, accusing me of HATING PHYSICS.

    I have little patience for illiterate people who only listen to their own voice, and there are far too many of them on YouTube. Read what I originally wrote!

    As for being simple-minded - atoms and electrons is what we are talking about, moron.

    Neurons are made from what? And the brain is made of what?

    What else is there except particles and space? Particles even mediate forces.

  • Radio waves are the cure for cancer... Making the radiation wave not kill people is another thing. 

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, read up on Einstein's general relativity; then tell me u understand the fundamental nature of reality.

    Richard Feynman, one of the greatest theoretical physicists that ever lived said in a lecture:

    "[this] is what we teach our physics students in the third or fourth year of graduate school. It is my task to convince you not to turn away because you don't understand it. You see my physics students don't understand it. That is because I don't understand it. Nobody does."

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, and who gave us high-tech weaponry? Physicists! Who gave us the nuclear bomb? Physicists! But who used the nuke? The POLITICIANS!

    Japan was nuked to prevent having to share the country with Russia, as the US had to do with Germany. And don't argue this point with me. Unlike you, I make an effort to try to understand what goes on in this world.

    You must be 14, still young enough and ignorant enough to believe in a fantastic future for all of human kind.

  • @jakeZaks2012 Why don't you watch my video the day of awakening then and I will lay those doubts to rest forever. I think its the third one down.

  • @AurumenK, agnostic in my case means I don't believe in any religion, but neither am I arrogant or ignorant enough to believe that there can't possibly be any kind of creator ("creator" is completely undefined). Nor do I believe that conscious experience is created by atoms and electrons moving about. Just look at the image in front of you, the colors - that is clearly not atoms moving about.

    As for the economy: until enough people hurt badly enough, there will be little protest.

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, I like physics, I just don't like idiots like you. I don't put physicists on a pedestal because there is so much more to life. Ask a physicist to cure you of cancer or stop internal bleeding.

    You are looking for some utopian future where technology controls our lives, & we live forever in happy land. A lot of scientific research is funded by the Pentagon, for obvious reasons. Politics and economics will dominate our lives till the day we die. Don't get too carried away!

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, please, stop reading the tabloids and read some science, then you might be less ignorant.

    You clearly haven't heard of quantum entanglement or the many-worlds interpretation of QM - the fact is, very little is known about the fundamental nature of reality. Care to explain conscious experience? Neuroscientists can't, and, unlike you, I've read research.

    You are the one who clearly dislikes physics.

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, we DO NOT understand the fundamentals of nature.

    QM was devised because physicists could no longer understand what nature was doing, so they just used equations which told them the outcome of an interaction, but NOT actually what was going on.

    QED, for example, treats light as a particle - ALWAYS! - but, if u take that literally, then light anlayses EVERY possible path to its destination, including curved paths, which is absurd, & how does it know its destination?

  • @WarpFieldTheorist, I didn't say it was useless YOU DOLT! And, if you bothered to keep yourself educated, you'd know that a lot of PhDs in physics can't get employment in physics research - so much has been done, that there's little left to do - many end up on Wall Street, instead, screwing up the economy with their "genius".

  • @jakeZaks2012. Nobody knows what will come from this in decades and centuries to come. When electricity was discovered people said " what is the point in messing around with that, it will never be useful for anything."  Try to see the bigger picture.

  • @MrJuno6, DID I SAY PHYSICS WAS GARBAGE? I said STOP WORSHIPPING PEOPLE FOR THEIR INTELLIGENCE!

    Do you have a PhD? No! Then let me trample all over you! Humans are humans - don't think science is going to change that.

    Two world wars. The Roman empire, British empire, American empire were all about stealing resources from other nations. Corporations still do this today, and they ruin lives, keep people impoverished and perpetuate child prostitution.

    Politics & Economics isn't going away!

  • @jakeZaks2012 Economics will go away along with their crap politics. My new system of universalism, video titled the day of awakening here on youtube will explain that.

  • This guy is my hero.

  • you gay

  • lol this is hilarious. I like your enthusiasm.

  • GREAT buddy!!!! Now almost the QM is gonna be clear in my mind :) go on man... ;)

  • Okay, you did show the speed of light, and also how light effects a particle. If the speed of light changed, could it deflect a particle more or less with a somewhat deterministic way with such speed. Your graph shows the speed of light effecting particles to go to predicted areas, right? Tell me the exact speed light needs to be to have no effect at all. Or is light's shininess the reactive ingredient.

  • If we tied ur hands behind your back, I don't think you could actually teach. Jk, love the video, and you're a great teacher. Keep it up, man

  • 6:55pm Tuesday (CDT) - Time in M

  • wth! dude get to the point!

  • This teacher is identical to my teacher Shi-Hai Dong of quantum mechanics Professor. Department of Physics. Superior School of Physics and Mathematics. National Polytechnic Institut

  • quntum physics is some weird shit

  • QM is THE BEST.. NICE VIDEO! I actually feel better about my B+ since I didn't take linear algebra or diff eq.

  • break down video into separate parts (pos 1, 2.& 3), so you can slow down a little!

  • this guy is a bafoon

  • man you should be a preacher!

  • you truly belive quantum mechanics is more difficult than general relativity?

  • @weweallthewayhome

    Hey, what do you mean? Isn't it?

  • You rock!!!!!

  • wow defo bruce lee!

  • 2:55

  • maybe they are just

    1/2nerdsdonyleesg Px

    2/4 0:36

  • 2:18

    Or nerds danceing on a dance floor.

    I mean the loveingly

    L

    8:12

  • 2:00

    10:24

  • March 24, 2010 Toyoda - DonyleeJ a c k!

    2:04am Thursday (JST) - Time in Japan

    March 24, 2010 Toyoda - DonyleeJ a c k!

  • 1:26pm Monday (CST) - Time in

    Mississippi, United States of America

    Postulates

    SayBryang

    E

  • totally amazing. Great knowledge, Great teacher.

  • Is that an Australian Accent?

  • 8:05am Monday (PST) - Time in Vancouver, British Columbia

    QM0.1: Postulates of Quantum Mechanics

    did we make it of course we did

  • frantically fantastic!

  • 3:58pm Friday (CST) - Time in Mexico City, Mexico

    La Paz 2:58pm MST 

    Tijuana 1:58pm PST

  • stupid mexican

  • you did a really great job man. Really helped me out

  • What is a good book to start with QM?

  • Cohen & Tanuji

  • Wow this guy looks like Bruce Lee!

  • Comment removed

  • @x1x2x3ct  Where was he wrong (outside the day he bought the tie)?

  • 2:51pm Tuesday (CST) - Time in Mississippi, United States of America

  • Dayum you are like BRILLIANT!!!!

  • he has a Mexican accent, oddly enough.

    he is a great public speaker I would fuck him in fact.

  • you should put up your pic on you channel so I can get a clear picture of what that would look like.

  • thanks for sharing.

  • You must be crazy. 4:40.

    That is how you teach.

    His understanding is full open.

    A 5 year old can grasp it.

    That is grade A.

    This energy is what you need in a QM teacher. It's imperative. I dno't give a shit if he scores 10% less on a 'knowledge test' , doesn't matter . This dude can teach when he's in his level.

  • He is very good, may have an accent, but I can understand him. Also has a love for the subject that draws your attention.

  • I can understand Donylee''s /English better than Albert Einstein's.

  • This guy is brilliant. He has good command of the English language. I have no problem with his accent or the how fast he is talking. I can understand him quite well and English is my third language. I am African. Thanks Donylee for posting this video your excellent presentation.

  • I understand everything he is saying...

  • nice work..........

  • He reminds me of Bruce Lee (R.I.P.).

  • wow system0system0, go suck a dick. your making fun of someone's accent because he's not a native english speaker? how about you and him both take a writing test. we'll see who sucks cock and whos not.

  • This man mentally towers over most of humanity and you're going to sit there and criticize his accent? You're a pathetic person.

  • @DoctorDrake28, lol. Mental intelligence isn't all there is to humanity or life. We still need fire fighters, cleaners, engineers, architects, teachers, doctors, nurses, builders, charity workers, plumbers, factory workers, programmers, etc.

    Quantum mechanics isn't going to sort out poverty, hunger, ill health, dictatorships, corrupt political and economic systems, or make us all happy.

  • @DoctorDrake28, little is known about what creates high intelligence, & it's likely nothing complicated. In other words, a few tweaks here & there, & we'd all be able to do QM.

    After all, our brains process & interpret images extremely rapidly - a task even a supercomputer can't do - & we all learn to speak complex languages - again, an incredibly difficult task that no computer is capable of mimicking.

    So, in a sense, we r all geniuses. A few minor adjustments & we'd all be able to do QM 2.

  • Donylee, this is amazing! I've studied many of Dr. Susskind's lectures on this topic, and I have to say that you bring an hour's worth of material into a very clear, understandable 10 minutes.

    For people who do not understand why he speaks so fast, you must realize that with only 10 minutes per episode, he needs to speak quickly or he will not fit all the material he needs to cover into one video. He assumes that you know you can always rewind and replay parts you don't catch.

  • this is brilliant. the only downside is that it is geared towards people that have at least some background. any suggestions on where to start so that i can better understand your lectures?

  • Do you need a background in the theories behind QM or the math itself? If just the theories, I can suggest IN SEARCH of SHRODINGERS CAT by John Gribbin, as well as UNCERTAINTY by David Lindley to get a decent background on the ideas, and how the physics world excepted them.

  • Wanda, I don't think little children are taking this course, not that I know off

  • I like the speed at which he talks. What I hate is when people don't get straight to the point and blabber for an hour when you could learn what they are teaching in 10 minutes.

  • I an very happy to see the video. Pl. keep up the good work and do not get disheartened by the comments of dogmatic people who have poor idea of what reality is. I would request you see "Saptabhangi" on google- a theory propounded 2500 years back. Very much quntum reality.

  • She (he?) is just trolling, people like that are to be ignored.

  • im new to this video classes, after watching this video i had the same feeling as u have.........this is easy understandable for the students who have studied QM previously....and i feel it helps as a rivision class for me.........

  • Comment removed

  • science always tries find the truth. They never claim that what they know is truth. In mediaval ages Galileo & cpoernicus faced the wrath for saying that earth is round and that it moves around sun & not vice versa.

  • This is gangster! Good physics instruction is like good hip hop....pure uncut columbian! Merci beaucoup.

  • I've had professors with thick accents before. When I have to think about and decide what words my teacher is saying, I have that much less time and concentration to spend on the concepts and ideas he is teaching.

  • Comment removed

  • Nice to see an educational vid. I admire your passion to teach. May I suggest, there are 2 things you need to work on that would GREATLY help people learn from you.

    1.Sloooww doowwnn. Give the new knowledge time to sink in.

    2. Work on your English pronunciations. When you say a new word, but mispronounce it, what word does your student learn? Ex: at 6:40, I have no idea what a laclassin operator is. Laplaccid? loclassin, loplassine? None of those words exist, & I'm out of guesses. I'm lost.

  • La place

  • I completely agree with you, bro. I am super interested in hearing what this guy has to say but he is way too fast and his accent makes it even more difficult to understand.

    this teacher is awsome but definately needs to slow down.

  • if you think the teacher's too fast I don't believe you need to be taking this course. He's presenting simple and elementary topics, how slow does he need to go?

  • you are right in half of what you said: yes, I should take many more math courses before understanding this guy... just so you have an idea I have not even taken calculus yet...I know, feel pity for me. lol!

    now, how slow does he need to be? as slow or as fast as his language is understandable. apart from understanding his material or not, this guy definately has a strong accent and add to that his speed... not all that clear.

    cheers!

  • Well, even I can understand him, and English is not even my first language.

  • Mathematics must be your first language.

  • Comment removed

  • You deserve to have a response on this page that isn't spammer bullshit.

    I've enjoyed your videos. Quantum mechanics is a subject I have a great deal of interest in but I don't have a whole lot of background knowledge. I appreciate your attempt to explain it in a way that someone like me can understand. Thanks for these videos, and keep on doing what you're doing. The ability to impart knowledge is a gift.

  • You are a petty person.

  • Let's just get to the Quantum Move.

    DEBORAHLEIGHGRAY

    JACQUELINEBISSE T T

    DEBORAHLEIGHGRAY

    TRUE AND VALID With help from those sources Take note:Eye do not wear the same coat over again.

  • JustifiedwardS A E V I N GRACENERGY

    MechanicskgraysJacQuelineMGHAM­MER

    QM0.1: Postulates of Quantum G R A C E

    MechanicskgraysJacQuelineMGHAM­MER

    JustifiedwardS A V E I N GRACENERGY

  • you're the particle moving left and right...:) i mean..cute

  • he starts of slow. then his position is uncertain for the rest of the lecture :)

  • ok no offence but seems you said nothing here .

    Why because you are using terms which if someone didn't study Quantum mechanics will not understand a thing of what you are saying,on the other hand ppl who did,know all this thing you've mentioned as it is the most basics things to know .

    an off topic:i ve seen your videos,i can't figure your degree of studies , for math ones,it is 1st-2nd year of college but when it comes to physics starts at 3rd year of college