Also, AIDS works like this: They start off having sex with your T-cells and carrying them over to their "Hideout" to rape and kill them. Then they go over and rape your whit blood cells and control them like an alien. then they fuck up some of your blood cells, then they go over to your immune system and reinact the Civil war, except the bad guys win this time, then you get fucked and die.
Phones DO actually cause cancer. They interact with your brain cells and fucks up your DNA, making you act different sometimes, and then that Fucked up cell that got a blowjob from the sounds are gonna multipy and infect other cells like a Freakin zombie, and eventually destroy your T-cells, and fuck up your brain and kill you.
my brother used condoms and his girlfriend has aids AND IS PREGNANT TOO!!! condoms are such shit and i WILL never use them EVER!!! look at africa they use them and youd think they drink aids for breakfast its so popular its like the popularity contest about who has aids and they ALL DO!! fucking gays fucking monkeys all goddamn day. y do they need to marry humans y not just monkeys cause thats what they did fuck!!!
Interesting side note: retroviruses make up a large portion of our genomes. Our non-coding DNA is littered with remnants of retroviruses, and new research is even showing activity in these regions as well.
The major thing that people seem to be missing here is that the chance of creating a virus that would be successful, not only against their hosts, but against other viruses, would take an enormous feat that we are incapable of performing. Evolution occurs over millions of millions of years. We have "symbiotic" relationships with a host of viruses, many of them retroviruses. I put symbiotic in quotes because it is debatable whether a virus is alive or not.
Damn. So what do you think about Australians? And for that matter, I went to school with a guy from Scotland and couldn't understand a single word he said. Yet you bitch about Americans!
The mutation statement is also false. Mutation is actually fairly constant among viruses, which do not have DNA/RNA repairing proteins. Without the prokaryotic/eukaryotic multicellular complexity correcting mistakes, we can actually calculate the mutation rates of viruses fairly easily.
I should clarify. The mutation rate depends directly upon the hosts replicating enzymes, since viruses hijack the host enzymes to replicate. Replication is were mutation occurs. The rate is "high" because of the generation times of viruses, not because of anything special.
now that Jane Goldberg has the book about the lady who worked with the monkeys and was mysteriously killed we will do more work on this once the radiation hormesis DVD is finished...
This is a false statement. The technology was no where close. We had no clue how to sequence DNA or RNA, which is how viruses self replicate, not by proteins. There is a world of difference between using viral capsids to deliver proteins or molecules, and creating self replicating viruses.
So... in essence there are two likely scenarios. The first, being the most likely, is that a variation of the virus jumped from a closely related mammal and adapted to a human host. Kind of like what we are seeing with bird flu. Or... a retrovirus that normally colonized our bodies/genomes became virulent. This is less likely.
2) The phylogeny of mammals is fairly known. However, it is interesting that the phylogeny of HIV corresponds to that of mammals. E.G., our closest relative is chimps, HIV's closest relative is the strain found in monkeys. Their are also strains in cats, dogs, etc. Retroviruses are in all living organisms.
Thanks for the physiology review, but I don't necessarily think the author of this video was blaming the military.
For the readers...
1) We can barely utilize or manufacture viral capsids to deliver simple compounds such as radioactive molecules, let alone single stranded RNA. We can't even maintain in tact single stranded RNA in the lab. Hell, we have to take every precaution to maintain the integrity of double stranded RNA for an hour or two.
This video is so dependent on fairly in-depth training in biology that it will likely not reach most people. In any event, I'd like to thank you for your presentation. While I'm not sure you've proven that it was a military operation, I think you'd given an interesting insight in to viral weapon technology.
NO Gloria there was NEVER an ORIGINAL Isolation of HIV...Dr Gallo's work was NEVER peer reviewed and Dr Montagnier made the bold claim " We Did Not Purify"...the monkey theory and the Horowitzs theory is just that a theory.
yeah but I think Dean Loren feels that there is ANOTHER situation where for some time there was a virus "let go", later it just rolled along on hype, thus you cannot get a true read on HIV because that one IS fake.....deep topic here
Paula If you have the time please go to AIDSMYTHEXPOSEDDOTCOM Click the Common Questions Page and Click the "Alternative theories" Link "HIV/AIDS Made in the Lab"..This a Long Rebuttal against Dr Horowitz and that Mycoplasmas are a MYTH too..
Also, AIDS works like this: They start off having sex with your T-cells and carrying them over to their "Hideout" to rape and kill them. Then they go over and rape your whit blood cells and control them like an alien. then they fuck up some of your blood cells, then they go over to your immune system and reinact the Civil war, except the bad guys win this time, then you get fucked and die.
nickysticky100 1 month ago
Phones DO actually cause cancer. They interact with your brain cells and fucks up your DNA, making you act different sometimes, and then that Fucked up cell that got a blowjob from the sounds are gonna multipy and infect other cells like a Freakin zombie, and eventually destroy your T-cells, and fuck up your brain and kill you.
nickysticky100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
my brother used condoms and his girlfriend has aids AND IS PREGNANT TOO!!! condoms are such shit and i WILL never use them EVER!!! look at africa they use them and youd think they drink aids for breakfast its so popular its like the popularity contest about who has aids and they ALL DO!! fucking gays fucking monkeys all goddamn day. y do they need to marry humans y not just monkeys cause thats what they did fuck!!!
curdle1 2 years ago
@curdle1 LOL everyone vote this guy up.
challywang 1 year ago
Interesting side note: retroviruses make up a large portion of our genomes. Our non-coding DNA is littered with remnants of retroviruses, and new research is even showing activity in these regions as well.
beeecraft 2 years ago
The ONLY way this could be accomplished is by usinf preexisting genetic code, a technology that did not exist back in the day.
beeecraft 2 years ago
The major thing that people seem to be missing here is that the chance of creating a virus that would be successful, not only against their hosts, but against other viruses, would take an enormous feat that we are incapable of performing. Evolution occurs over millions of millions of years. We have "symbiotic" relationships with a host of viruses, many of them retroviruses. I put symbiotic in quotes because it is debatable whether a virus is alive or not.
beeecraft 2 years ago
these are such interesting comments....are you in NYC? Perhaps Dean Loren and you could do a show about this. I have a daily TV show in Manhattan
-Paula Gloria
(in my Dad's account now that youtube disabled mine)
mrcon5 2 years ago
its lipo not lippo, pronounce lypo. i hate you americans and you shitty version of our language.
wardydave 2 years ago
Damn. So what do you think about Australians? And for that matter, I went to school with a guy from Scotland and couldn't understand a single word he said. Yet you bitch about Americans!
BornCitizen 2 years ago
thats an accent, not a misinterpretation of our language.
wardydave 2 years ago
'monkies' that wield machettes and have other such anti-social habits, not the monkeys that swing about in trees and entertain us in zoos.
mmmbeachlover 2 years ago
how come then it's mostly monkies that have it?
mmmbeachlover 2 years ago
i think you'll find that the monkeys that aids aparently came from dont actually have any type of aids.
wardydave 2 years ago
1stly I was talkin about monkies, not monkeys..
...n 2ndly the Aids virus can mutate 50 times faster than the common cold - so it's unlikely that we know who's got what at any one time.
mmmbeachlover 2 years ago
The mutation statement is also false. Mutation is actually fairly constant among viruses, which do not have DNA/RNA repairing proteins. Without the prokaryotic/eukaryotic multicellular complexity correcting mistakes, we can actually calculate the mutation rates of viruses fairly easily.
beeecraft 2 years ago
Crack on and sort it then.
mmmbeachlover 2 years ago
I should clarify. The mutation rate depends directly upon the hosts replicating enzymes, since viruses hijack the host enzymes to replicate. Replication is were mutation occurs. The rate is "high" because of the generation times of viruses, not because of anything special.
beeecraft 2 years ago
So it has the ability to mutate 'dramatically' then.
mmmbeachlover 2 years ago
This is sweet!
Deee36 2 years ago
Love all your comments
Actually, the technology for delivering protein encapsulated proteins was refined by the Nazis.
The protein actually casues the cells to not die
a timely death therefore aging like cancer cells.
Hence the first term - Gay Cancer.
The technology today in the labs is just about
what was available in 1972. if you were in a
state of the art lab financed by the government.
deanloren 3 years ago
now that Jane Goldberg has the book about the lady who worked with the monkeys and was mysteriously killed we will do more work on this once the radiation hormesis DVD is finished...
paulagloria 3 years ago
This is a false statement. The technology was no where close. We had no clue how to sequence DNA or RNA, which is how viruses self replicate, not by proteins. There is a world of difference between using viral capsids to deliver proteins or molecules, and creating self replicating viruses.
beeecraft 2 years ago
So... in essence there are two likely scenarios. The first, being the most likely, is that a variation of the virus jumped from a closely related mammal and adapted to a human host. Kind of like what we are seeing with bird flu. Or... a retrovirus that normally colonized our bodies/genomes became virulent. This is less likely.
beeecraft 3 years ago
did you see Dean's comments?
paulagloria 3 years ago
2) The phylogeny of mammals is fairly known. However, it is interesting that the phylogeny of HIV corresponds to that of mammals. E.G., our closest relative is chimps, HIV's closest relative is the strain found in monkeys. Their are also strains in cats, dogs, etc. Retroviruses are in all living organisms.
beeecraft 3 years ago
Thanks for the physiology review, but I don't necessarily think the author of this video was blaming the military.
For the readers...
1) We can barely utilize or manufacture viral capsids to deliver simple compounds such as radioactive molecules, let alone single stranded RNA. We can't even maintain in tact single stranded RNA in the lab. Hell, we have to take every precaution to maintain the integrity of double stranded RNA for an hour or two.
beeecraft 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
so the government wanted to kill the gays but it backfired cuz straight people started getting it now it's spreading hah.
XxZombieCarnagexX 4 years ago
which vaccines, Hep B, polio?
jtheis6 4 years ago
is gene therapy stem cell therapy the answer to those infected with adeno-simian virus combination?
jtheis6 4 years ago
The inventor and nobel prize winner of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)does not believe HIV is the cause of AIDS, Karry Mullis. Look it up.
benedictive 4 years ago
This video is so dependent on fairly in-depth training in biology that it will likely not reach most people. In any event, I'd like to thank you for your presentation. While I'm not sure you've proven that it was a military operation, I think you'd given an interesting insight in to viral weapon technology.
kuzb 4 years ago
do you know much about biowarfare?
paulagloria 4 years ago
the point is though that it was made not by sex with monkeys but in a lab right?
paulagloria 4 years ago
NO Gloria there was NEVER an ORIGINAL Isolation of HIV...Dr Gallo's work was NEVER peer reviewed and Dr Montagnier made the bold claim " We Did Not Purify"...the monkey theory and the Horowitzs theory is just that a theory.
HIVDISSIDENT 4 years ago 2
yeah but I think Dean Loren feels that there is ANOTHER situation where for some time there was a virus "let go", later it just rolled along on hype, thus you cannot get a true read on HIV because that one IS fake.....deep topic here
paulagloria 4 years ago
Paula If you have the time please go to AIDSMYTHEXPOSEDDOTCOM Click the Common Questions Page and Click the "Alternative theories" Link "HIV/AIDS Made in the Lab"..This a Long Rebuttal against Dr Horowitz and that Mycoplasmas are a MYTH too..
HIVDISSIDENT 4 years ago
I haven't the time to put on this right now but we really need to get a serious panel going
hey thx for staying on this!
paulagloria 4 years ago