Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
This has been flagged as spam show
Hmmmm,in 90's tennis surfaces didn't change a lot. Federer started with a fast grasscourts and if it stayed like that,he wold dominate on grass totaly. But he adopted very well on this slowing down of grass and hardcourts. Supouse that happened in 90's, I'm not sure if Sampras would have that kind of success. Then,that would aloud players like Agassi or Chang to have even more success than they had. That's why Nadal,Djoko and others are so god. Fed just has more variabillity then Sampras.
TheDobardecko 2 weeks ago in playlist federer vs sampras wimbledon 2001
@ davvid266 yes I totally agree. I miss the serve and volley and attacking style of tennis. It's not as exciting to watch baseline rallies. The grass isn't as fast these days. But the returns of that first serves by the likes of Djokovic, Nadal and Murray has improved so it's harder to get straight in to the net like Pete did.
trustorbust2009 8 months ago
This were good attacking tennis, now they are almost all just defensive players, just waiting for the rival's error.
davvid266 8 months ago
9:31 thats what she said
brn3mo 1 year ago
@brn3mo lol
Pundit2k 1 year ago