Macy Afterlife ITC Clips: Spirit Faces

[Jnnburk]

Hi Mark, thanks for uploading this! Jenn

[Cosmicangels]

Thanks for uploading...really interesting and I would love to have some photos taken with this....there are a lot of audio captures and not a lot of visual evidence with the spirit world....going to get that book!

[Riandy74]

U will Die in 7 Days LOLz

[jOWNZin22]

they still make polaroid...thought that ended in the early 2000s

[Tommyr]

Oh for Pete's sake, this is just plain stupid. People actually believe this BS???

[joshanator1]

oh man, I wanna go to where ever THAT was. that is SOOO........ cool looking!

[FIRSTGLADI8R]

This is so stupid. It is just a polaroid with slight movement in poor lighting conditions. You might try and take a photography class. (face palm)

[worlditc]

AZ, thanks for the heartening comments about Spirit Faces!

Mark

[azseamonkey]

Mr. Macy: Hello from Phoenix, Az. In 2008 I checked out 'Spirit Faces' from my library, by mistake (got mixed in with some other books) it was the best mistake ever, i have been HOOKED on ITC ever since. You, your work, the spirit team..... ALL AMAZING! it's absolutely FASCINATING! I have experimented w/ITC & I think I have a few results from the camera tv loop method & water method. YOU HAVE TRULY BEEN AN INSPIRATION TO ME. ITC continues to comfort me when im missing my father THANK U SO MUCH

[WeAreBorg359]

Or at least I thik. Well, there's the Holy Ghost.

[jamesdevereblest]

Hello Mark,

Give it your best shot!

James

[worlditc]

Hi James, got your email. Thanks! I learned long ago, no point arguing with skeptics. We all have a boggle point. When new information comes in, our mind tries to accommodate it, but if it'll destroy our personal worldview, the mind closes down. Doesn't matter what kind of good, solid evidence and how many people have seen the genuine results first-hand, a boggled mind can't accept it. Some move on, others crusade. Personal choices . . . All the best, Mark Macy

[Iracomm]

This is very obvious on how this was done. This is nothing more then camera jitter.

[Agui007]

This is because of the vibrational difference. Don't forget, so much is vibrating around us as this explains the shimmering.

[Iracomm]

"vibrational difference"?

I have 40 years of photography experience.

Again this is a purpously done event. He is vibrating the camera.

This types of cameras can have shutter speed as slow as 1/2 sec. With the flash covered the electronic eye will not see enough light and keep the shutter open for the full amount of time.

This is what he wanted.

How about using a standard digital camera with the shutter set for 1/60 and ISO of 1600 or greater?

I'll bet there will be not ghostly image.

[Agui007]

I understand what you mean as he should have sat the camera down on a worktop or something to steady it.  This does not explain the slightly different faces that appear i some ofthese photos. Of course you must be careful but have a look at the ITC site.

[Iracomm]

It absolutly does explain the slightly different faces. If you look at the first shot of the female reporter, you can see her image is exactly the same, just moved a lttle (camera motion). The exact same hair line. Or did her long lost mother have the EXACT hair style. How come the pictures the reporter took aren't show? Too steady? No ghosts?

The ones from is book are due to the subject moving.

Very easly duplicated. Iv'e done it many times.

Its called trick photography.

[Iracomm]

It's ovbious that none of the people (reporters) are photographer, else they would have suggested what I have already said. And they would have know that if the shutter was open for more then 1/60 second, one most use a stable platform (tri pod), unles one is an experianced photographer and have a camera that when the shutter release is pressed, it wont jiggle the camera.

Let a profesional use his/her camera and see what happens. Too many ways to prove and disprove. Yet, no one has done so.

[Iracomm]

The fact that there in NO control in this experiment proofs this is fraudulent. No expermiment can be proven without a control. Even the reports should have known that. Bad invesitageting.

[Iracomm]

I visited the web site. My opionon, it's nothing to get excited about. The whole premise of the site is to sell his books. There is no sientific methods reported to support his claims. All the photographs seen can easily be explained. NO GHOSTS.

All of these effects are do to camera motion and/or subject motion. Too easily duplicated. Too easily disproved.

[WeAreBorg359]

Actually, there are no ghosts, only anels and demons. People who seek this kind of thing may be shown it by demons who wish to decieve.

[ChillMB]

That is a scientific fact=]

[Agui007]

If you look at 1:51 you will see that the two faces are different. Like one's and old woman and we have the other woman. Please explain.

[Iracomm]

Looking at the image, you can see 3 seperate faces. The subject moved purpously into 3 different spots. And the camera was moved in or out.. Causing diffrent sizes of the faces. You can see all the hair lines are exactly the same. With the movement, burring will occure and transparence, images will take on differenct ghostly characteristics by why of the blurring and transperency. This effect was done with full knowloage of the photographer and subject.

[ChillMB]

99% of people putting out books etc, are mostly in it for money. When money comes into the equation, everything changes and you are very correct to question it. While I absolutely believe in the afterlife,a lot of this stuff is bogus.

[jtwalkthruwalls]

Mark,

Some of these luminator pictures are quite amazing - I particularly found the one of your son to be vivid. Great to see you have some YouTube content up. I have something up on my channel if you want to have a look.

John Topp