NIST WTC 7 Report - Press Briefing 8/21/08 pt 6

[danp5648]

No talk of NASA's findings?? That should have been one of the questions. The lady from popular mechanics, "do you have a question si??r" History Channel had a group of children die that day, I would think they would be a bit more supportive.

[FreedumbFighter28]

Lights out for truth......

[lamiac2411]

See folks perfect example of how the governmetn gets away with shit. They just make laws, bills, tax codes,etc in the form of 1-5000 page reports, knowing full well even is some1 tried 2 read through all of it there is no possible way to actually understand it. Then they will point to it, hey just read the report!!

[blavatsky3]

It's elegant and fits for a NO Negligence claim for the INSURANCE.

Iron rich micro- Spheres have never been answered by NIST in fact they have refused to offer any reason for these iron spheres in the 4 known WTC powder samples.

In fact NIST knows full well that ordinary office fires could not have produced ANY of the iron rich spheres.

So if you see any officials always ask them why there were iron -rich microspheres in the powder samples found at the WTC site.

[Skeptic121]

Suggestions: No insults!

Lead with the best arguments:

First: according to NIST, the east and west sides of the main roof fell within a half second of each other. The penthouse dropped first, but how to explain the main structure falling together at nearly free fall acceleration?

Second: why was the steel recycled so quickly? It was first moved to Fresh Kills landfill where it could have stayed.

Third: Prof. Jonathan Barnett found evaporated steel from WTC7. Ordinary fires? No way!

[iBlindGame]

@Skeptic121 Lead with best arguments, eh? You are a fool. These guys limited exposure to themselves throughout the investigation. Damn, one would think a little logic wouldn't be so hard...

We Have the Results and Only We Have the Results (15 minutes)

watch?v=iQdJuQLNFCk

[Skeptic121]

@iBlindGame Hey, if you can do it better please forget about me and do it!

[Skeptic121]

The questioner did a very poor job, throwing out several disorganized questions at once. Western ears might find Dr. Sunder arrogant. I am 99% sure Dr. Sunder is a Brahmin, a member of the priestly intellectual caste. Brahmins do not suffer fools gladly. He works for NIST, a government agency; he will not say anything against his employer. If you want to delve deeper into his motives, the Hindu community has its own problems with Muslims... FWIW, I am of European ancestry.

[catrapesdog99]

yeah they turned the light off think about it. why did they do that????

[dieyoubastards]

anything to ditract from the truth.

no reasonable person believes Sunder.His motives are the same as everyone else,greed for money and power, and fear.

[iBlindGame]

@Skeptic121 All your comments are simply distractions. For evaluating NIST, learn to focus on what's important:

We Have the Results and Only We Have the Results (15 minutes)

watch?v=iQdJuQLNFCk

[revoltnow567]

"Sound science, sound science" what a LIAR!!!!! when you have to change the laws of physics in order for the story to make sense, its obviosly a lie. i cant believe how ignorant most people are. a fucking fire made bulding 7 collapse? that is IMPOSSIBLE.

[SteveM818]

Sham Sunder says there were no explosions recorded from WTC-7. Well, that's a lie because here's a video of WTC-7 where you can hear a loud explosion just seconds before the building falls:

27minutes, 45seconds in:

tinyurlDOTcom/5swnld

And there are witnesses who said they heard the explosions too, so...

Sham has some 'splainin' to do!!

[terrymanning1]

The infowars gut gets owned.

He is a f***ing idiot, just like his master Alex Jones.

[23456D]

I'm think he should have been better prepared to address his question to Sunder, but I think it's rather telling that Sunder's answer to EVERYTHING the guys asked is

"read this, understand it, when you've understood it we can have a conversation."

[streakingcameraman]

Would you really want to argue with a truther. Point being, truthers will sit there and argue when you prove them wrong or their evidence in void.

[Tsutomu6]

Would you really want to argue with a debunker? Point being, debunkers will sit there and argue when you prove them wrong or their evidence in void.

[streakingcameraman]

Problem is, it's rare to actually prove a good debunker wrong. You see, truthers think that when a good debunker states his case and doesn't argue for an eternity, they won. This is not the case. In a debunkers mind, YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID.

[Tsutomu6]

Then make your point, rather than talking about the discussion itself.

But I guess you feel more confident in talking about all the truthers in general.

Come on, give me some formula, some something that shows you even have little knowledge about physics, fluid mechanics, mechnics, thermodynamics, anything!?

[SciMethod]

@terrymanning1 NIST wouldn't talk to scientists or even average citizens, so this guy had to go to someone from the media to get invited to the press conference. You may not know that NIST was unscientific throughout, but that guy knows. NIST did no tests, and they didn't even release the data from their simulation. If you were to see this in context, it might make more sense to you what was taking place.

[SciMethod]

@terrymanning1 NIST wouldn't talk to scientists or even average citizens, so this guy had to go to someone from the media to get invited to the press conference. You may not know that NIST was unscientific throughout, but that guy knows. NIST did no tests, and they didn't even release the data from their simulation. If you were to see this in context, it might make more sense to you what was taking place. They haven't provided any definitive answer, yet they act as if they do.

[iBlindGame]

@terrymanning1 Important for evaluating NIST:

We Have the Results and Only We Have the Results (15 minutes)

watch?v=iQdJuQLNFCk

[iBlindGame]

@terrymanning1 Some things everyone needs to know to sort this out:

watch?v=iQdJuQLNFCk

[islofly]

Believe black is white......or use your right to arms.

[bluecaffeine]

seriously we need to wake up

[LUKAvac2]

infowars guy didnt do well. 2bad4all

next time, he should write questions down !!

2 hard strate questions and its ok, but not to talk 5min, no time for that.

[RonPaulMall]

infowars guy's question was only 2 mins

and yes we need to wake up

[LUKAvac2]

he hade to do it better !

and bitch with microphone, i hate her