Added: 3 years ago
From: Kompins
Views: 15,199
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • very nice!

  • I hope to get onto the CB125T later this year. We are allowed 150 cc in F4 racing and I have a 150cc upgrade kit. My current single can be viewed at

    I hope to get onto the CB125T later this year. We are allowed 150 cc in F4 racing and I have a 150cc upgrade kit. My current single can be viewed at

    Search CB150 12500 (Can't seem to paste a link)

    About 18.5 hp.

    About 18.5 hp.

  • Hi Kiwiavi,

    Nice machine mate.

    I love the little Honda engines.

    My wife is coming out of retirement to race the 125 this year so it has been freshened up with a much modified Dyna S CB750 ignition. Hopefully this will cure a miss fire above 12,000rpm.

    Also building a new engine with lightened crank and maybe home made pistons.

  • @Kompins

    I had a missfire at high rpm and found it was to weak a spark and it actually ran better with a smaller than standard plug gap!?

    Isnt the standard max power at about 13,000rpm on the 125 twin?

    I looked at one cb125 twin engine and it had inlet ports of only about 10-15mm; but I heard that some engines were of lower restricted power as the standard was about 16bhp, so did they make a restricted version with the small ports for smaller carbs?

  • @tpvalley I run Dyna coils and a total loss ignition system, big fat sparks until the battery gets below 10volts. See my comments above about rear wheel horsepower and rpms. The CB125TA was the non restricted version for the UK, later versions have small bore exhausts and a retard in the electronic ignition to limit power.

  • your daughter has taste!

  • Honda claimed 16.5hp @ 11000 rpm. This was emphatically NOT at the back wheel, rear wheel hp was more likely 13.

    Manufacturers claims of hp were based on crankshaft hp and usually optimistic at that Honda! For example they claimed 42 for the CB500T but when tested in 1975, actual rear wheel hp was 33.5! CBX1000; they claimed 103, actual 85.5.

  • Beautiful sound ... just excellent

  • Yes it sounds wonderful, I would love to take it for a run around a race track but it would destroy the sound meter!

  • nice, i had a 1971 cb100 honda (basically the same engine, it just revs even higher due to the lighter weight piston) that I ported intake and exhaust, turned a alum intake manifold, installed a 28mm dellarto carb, and a hand rolled megaphone. custom seat-tank-clipons-rear sets. I rode it 850 miles to Illinois for a motoguzzi rally

  • I am sure the CB125T was never imported into the USA (it's a twin cylinder engine). The CB100 was a single cylinder engine sold worldwide and also as a 125, sounds like you had lots of fun.

    Safe engine revs are dictated in the first place by the stroke of the engine. The stroke of the CB100 is 49.5mm and the CB125T 41mm so the latter should be cable of revving higher. When I get around to making a new cam I reckon we can go to 14,000 occasionally before thing start colliding, we shall see.

  • @jonesjpthrower The CB100 was a single cylinder engine. The CT125T is a two cylinder with twin carbs. In standard trim it put out 17hp at 11,000rpm. The 100 cc engine was a single and was also available as a 125 and a 185.

  • what did you do to the engine? port? big carb? pipe? ect?

  • Ported head and skimmed head, modified Honda 250 Hornet carbs, tuned exhausts plus stuff I can't remeber. You can find much more if you search for 'The Fang' and go to 'News 2008'.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more