@kimi625 I'm very much satistfied with it so that's all that matters. An overall worthy upgrade from a GTX295. Dx11, tessellation, beats my ol 295 as a single gpu. Not an ATI fan btw.
LOL WHY! Such a waste of money I have a AMD Phenom II x4 965 and some other cheap shit for a total of $1000 including the GTX 275. Now if you would notice that avarage FPS of 52. With my system If you kill the AA and AF and turn specular to high instead of VH and at 1920 x 1200 I get an average of 55. And thoes two graphics cards alone cost more then my whole build. Think about that. You really don't miss AF and AA at 1920 x 1200 ad you save $1000's of dollers. Anyone who does that is a fool.
@vaguedustin I understand you exactly. But it's a hobby. Yes I'll admit it's a waste of money for so much power but hey, I don't care. Call me a fool? call me wat ever. I'm still that happy fool with that killer PC and I ain't broke.
no way i was checking AMD processor's before buying my rig's. and i have chose the i7 860 instead of using amd, their processor's X4 black edition for example in .... GTA is used about 70-85% depending of the rig. i am using 35% @2.8Ghz .... and 28% at 3.5GHZ... just waiting my cooling so i can pull it at around 3.8-4.0 ghz. way better way to waste my money, didn't even know P55 product where that good
now your full of shit. the amd phenom 2 isnt 50% of the corei7. its around 85%. and amd themselves confirmed that there "bulldozer" processor coming out in early 2011 will be the top of the line. they are releasing there own version of hyperthreading but its not just doublepumping cores like intel. too bad i dont have enough info to tell you guys. amd is keeping everything quiet till 2011 or late 2010
Alot of people are getting draw into the new AZZA Solano 1000 Black Full Tower. I have one and I just finish building a new High-End Gaming PC. You can view it on my profile page. My i5 system with the new AZZA Solano 1000 looks sweet. Check it out.
lol i know. i totaly agree with ya. i7 is made mainly for 3d and cad and other programs for designing stuff. if you want to save money, go for amd black edition. 90% of core i7 power, over half the money.
i didnt mean exactly 90%... its around there. 85-90. anyway when amd bulldozer processors come out, there gonna wipe the floor with any i7 or i9 processor, even future intel processors wont be able to stand up to it. gonna preorder it as soon as its out :d. along with nvidia's new upcoming dx11 card.
It's nowhere near around there. 1366 chipsets are over 50% faster than the fastest AMD made.
Also, you can't, with any sort of credibility, say that the new AMD chips are going "wipe the floor" with an i7 or i9 when there aren't benchmarks available.
You're talking out of your ass, which is pretty much a waste of both of our time.
64-bit OS supports up to 2048GB of RAM (2tb). But going over 32 or so is mostly for high end hosting solutions that demand huge amounts of memory and processing power.
You will not need even 16GB of RAM for a PC video game for a long time.
hey man im getting an i7 920 and an ati 5850 but i dont know what motherboard i should get, i was gonna go with yours but i only want to spend about 200-320$ any boards you would reccomend for gaming in that price range
"Maxishine" is an Islamic fundamentalist ,Do Not Support him , Have No Tolerance for the Intolerant .. Equality for Women everywhere , this 2009 ,not the 9th century,...
why would u have 8 gb, unless u bought more memory than u could use ur system dosnt make sense, i7 have a tripple channel memory controler and dimms are sold in 3's so unless u bought 9 and didnt use one... and you cant just have 1 tb in raid0 wow you know nothing
I know nothing? well im the one who owns the computer so i wouldnt be talking, smart ass.
Ok so maybe i made a mistake about the 1 TB RAID 0, idk y i wrote that but I have 8 GB cause i felt like it , okay? geez. you with all your reasonings.
only stupid people go higher on the i7. you can easily go over 4ghz on the 920. even a 975 (wich is three times the price of a 920) would still have to be overclocked to get to the 4ghz. at this time the 920 has the best bang for your bucks :). you better spend the extra money on better videocards.
True. i wanted to get what made noticeable impact on games first(graphics cards). Plus i7 for cheap +overclock to near performance of more expensive makes more sense.
reason is because my cpu is a bottlekneck for GTX295 in quadsli. I get 60fps when i overclock the cpu. I would need the extreme edition i7s overclocked. But even then then there still maybe a bottlekneck.
the sound is surreal.
NETduDe86 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
conta de luz FAIL
nanikow 9 months ago
I have Crysis running same as yours but I have Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 2,4GHz, 4GB DDR2 800MHz RAM and... GeForce 8800GT x2, lol.
Radeghost 1 year ago
omg, this is fuckin bad
i've got an intel core2duo @ 2,6 ghz and a geforce gts250 and crysis is running as fast as at your pc ;)
darkkiller1337 1 year ago
@darkkiller1337 lol impressive!
Playboyer69 1 year ago
Damn 9800GX2 still is a better card than The new GTX series.
gatler05 1 year ago
@gatler05 you mad bro
Timbojones0123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Timbojones0123 Why the fuck would I be mad, you dumb fuck.
gatler05 1 year ago
@gatler05 Not even close now, not even close 9 months ago.
guitarguy2637 10 months ago
@guitarguy2637 trolololololololol
gatler05 10 months ago
@gatler05 Thanks for finding the word I was looking for, I appreciate it.
guitarguy2637 9 months ago
@guitarguy2637 hahaha
gatler05 9 months ago
480 is better than the 5870
abc9354 1 year ago
OMG :D GTX480 is really shit GPU u should have gotten MSI Lightning 5870 cf
kimi625 1 year ago
@kimi625 I'm very much satistfied with it so that's all that matters. An overall worthy upgrade from a GTX295. Dx11, tessellation, beats my ol 295 as a single gpu. Not an ATI fan btw.
Playboyer69 1 year ago
give me 2 radeon 5970 cards and i run barrely 10 fps on metro 2033 thats how shitty ATI is
and that on 4500 mhz i7
Arnoud1987000 1 year ago
@Arnoud1987000 oh really? :O then it must be a miracle that i can run metro with dx10 max settings on my ati radeon 4890soc and have average fps 53
kimi625 1 year ago
you should have gotten the 9800gt for physx
aznb0i313 1 year ago
@aznb0i313 well just recently I did upgrade to a GTS 250 1gb for physx and sold both GTX 295s and got a single GTX 480.
Playboyer69 1 year ago
@Playboyer69 NICE!!!
aznb0i313 1 year ago
@aznb0i313 well I'm using a 1gb GTS 250 for physx.
Playboyer69 1 year ago
LOL WHY! Such a waste of money I have a AMD Phenom II x4 965 and some other cheap shit for a total of $1000 including the GTX 275. Now if you would notice that avarage FPS of 52. With my system If you kill the AA and AF and turn specular to high instead of VH and at 1920 x 1200 I get an average of 55. And thoes two graphics cards alone cost more then my whole build. Think about that. You really don't miss AF and AA at 1920 x 1200 ad you save $1000's of dollers. Anyone who does that is a fool.
vaguedustin 1 year ago
@vaguedustin I understand you exactly. But it's a hobby. Yes I'll admit it's a waste of money for so much power but hey, I don't care. Call me a fool? call me wat ever. I'm still that happy fool with that killer PC and I ain't broke.
Playboyer69 1 year ago
@Playboyer69 Well if you have the money have fun I guess XD
vaguedustin 1 year ago
the crysis benchmark sucks! it's the game that do the difference...
DEABlade 1 year ago
indeed it is....
no way i was checking AMD processor's before buying my rig's. and i have chose the i7 860 instead of using amd, their processor's X4 black edition for example in .... GTA is used about 70-85% depending of the rig. i am using 35% @2.8Ghz .... and 28% at 3.5GHZ... just waiting my cooling so i can pull it at around 3.8-4.0 ghz. way better way to waste my money, didn't even know P55 product where that good
Nemerok 1 year ago
@mhaneline
now your full of shit. the amd phenom 2 isnt 50% of the corei7. its around 85%. and amd themselves confirmed that there "bulldozer" processor coming out in early 2011 will be the top of the line. they are releasing there own version of hyperthreading but its not just doublepumping cores like intel. too bad i dont have enough info to tell you guys. amd is keeping everything quiet till 2011 or late 2010
TheCompyshop 1 year ago
i got 45 average with 2x superclocked gtx 280's and i can post a vid to how you if you want to see...
Eclipezz 1 year ago
That is one sick ride! Dude one GTX 295 would be enough for me!
Gabestein1 2 years ago
one gtx295 IS enough
KKOPPI 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Alot of people are getting draw into the new AZZA Solano 1000 Black Full Tower. I have one and I just finish building a new High-End Gaming PC. You can view it on my profile page. My i5 system with the new AZZA Solano 1000 looks sweet. Check it out.
keiki646 2 years ago
so much money for i7 and gtx295 for 45 average fps...nice :D
bl3ck0ne 2 years ago
its on 16xAA on Very High settings, obviously you have no how much 45fps actually is is with those settings
darkstallion666 2 years ago
lol i know. i totaly agree with ya. i7 is made mainly for 3d and cad and other programs for designing stuff. if you want to save money, go for amd black edition. 90% of core i7 power, over half the money.
TheCompyshop 2 years ago
90%? you're high. hyper threading alone puts the i7 light years ahead of the fastest AMD chip. Go check out some CPU benchmarks.
90%... shit. That's so pulled out of your ass it's not even funny.
mhaneline 1 year ago
i didnt mean exactly 90%... its around there. 85-90. anyway when amd bulldozer processors come out, there gonna wipe the floor with any i7 or i9 processor, even future intel processors wont be able to stand up to it. gonna preorder it as soon as its out :d. along with nvidia's new upcoming dx11 card.
TheCompyshop 1 year ago
It's nowhere near around there. 1366 chipsets are over 50% faster than the fastest AMD made.
Also, you can't, with any sort of credibility, say that the new AMD chips are going "wipe the floor" with an i7 or i9 when there aren't benchmarks available.
You're talking out of your ass, which is pretty much a waste of both of our time.
mhaneline 1 year ago
64-bit OS supports up to 2048GB of RAM (2tb). But going over 32 or so is mostly for high end hosting solutions that demand huge amounts of memory and processing power.
You will not need even 16GB of RAM for a PC video game for a long time.
darkzerk7 2 years ago
You idiot?
46 bit OS is much more faster than 32, 64 had more proccesing power
NBAasDOGG 2 years ago
Comment removed
yamato99935 2 years ago
46-bit os?? And 32gb of ram is only for hosting servers not gaming
yamato99935 2 years ago
maybe not but alot of people who use demanding apps need alot of ram
TheCompyshop 2 years ago
The 64 bit limit of RAM is 2 terabytes of RAM. Most high end servers support up to 128 GB RAM, some even more.
Dashing1256 2 years ago
hey man im getting an i7 920 and an ati 5850 but i dont know what motherboard i should get, i was gonna go with yours but i only want to spend about 200-320$ any boards you would reccomend for gaming in that price range
Aloltime 2 years ago
the most ram you can get is 24 gb right? thats the highest ive seen on dells...
hellomoto170 2 years ago
@hellomoto170 depends on what type of motherboard you get i say a motherboard that can hold up to 128 gigs of ram.
pyromaniac171 2 years ago
128gb ram? are you sure? i thought the most was 24gb memory at the moment?
hellomoto170 2 years ago
@hellomoto170 im sure like tyan made the motherboard
pyromaniac171 2 years ago
ok cool thanks.
hellomoto170 2 years ago
@hellomoto170 np
pyromaniac171 2 years ago
ihat that fuckin alien music.
Zico10101010 2 years ago 6
is imposible to have 32gb ram! idiotz
halfpol 2 years ago
NO CALL ME IDIOT OK MAN. My brother study informatic and he buy two ram of 16 gb in a normal shop of informatic, 16+16=32.
This is no impossible.
srquiros 2 years ago
@srquiros
Theres no 16gb sticks dude...
xIDemonHeroIx 2 years ago
ROLF!!!! 2-16gig sticks of ram..what a KOOK!
n1k7873 2 years ago
@halfpol not with i7.
Zico10101010 2 years ago
No its not moron, 64bit OS's can have 128gbs of RAM. Although no mobo can support that much but my mobo can support 32gbs of RAM.
kc9mav 2 years ago
I know, he use a other SO for the profession
srquiros 2 years ago
Peace yall. The ram costed me bout if i recall
Playboyer69 2 years ago
lorddregan , If we were Man to Man Right now , You would be doing an inventory on how many teeth you own,....
mrjamesb56 2 years ago
"Maxishine" is an Islamic fundamentalist ,Do Not Support him , Have No Tolerance for the Intolerant .. Equality for Women everywhere , this 2009 ,not the 9th century,...
mrjamesb56 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
well said, brother.
lorddregan 2 years ago
just kidding, you are a fucking tool bro.
lorddregan 2 years ago
how much does the RAM cost?
manueex 2 years ago
ONLY!!!!!!!! this is imposible. My brother have the gtx 295 quad sli, 32 gb ram and the core i7 965 and run average 95,64 fps
srquiros 2 years ago
32gb ram, you are LOLY!
halfpol 2 years ago
damn i hate looking PC's better then mine lol.....
acidburn675 2 years ago
aww damn ur computer is sweet.
my PC that i built this summer has...
i7 920 @ 4.1 ghz, 8 GB 1333Mhz Ram, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 1792mb single, 1 TB RAID 0, 800watt PSU, Coolermaster V8 heatsink, Alienware Predator 2.0 Case (off eBay for 149$), and BluRay + colored 120mm fans
loneknight97 2 years ago
why would u have 8 gb, unless u bought more memory than u could use ur system dosnt make sense, i7 have a tripple channel memory controler and dimms are sold in 3's so unless u bought 9 and didnt use one... and you cant just have 1 tb in raid0 wow you know nothing
lootehcris 2 years ago
I know nothing? well im the one who owns the computer so i wouldnt be talking, smart ass.
Ok so maybe i made a mistake about the 1 TB RAID 0, idk y i wrote that but I have 8 GB cause i felt like it , okay? geez. you with all your reasonings.
loneknight97 2 years ago
Comment removed
rokr41 2 years ago
does it matter if i use i5 or i7 ?
darthvadermasterchie 2 years ago
i5 is deliberately made worse it's the cheaper but worse line of cores.
EnginnSH 2 years ago
Can i buy yur pc off u? plz plz plz plz plz!
and yeah, where do get the crysis benchmark program?
Kalic5109 2 years ago
google it ;p
Davidopoland 2 years ago
that weird sound made my speake4rs go crazy like SUPER sound like the sound was moving wow
taltigolt 2 years ago
omg bloody rich bitch :)
Dra60oN 2 years ago 3
Where do you actually get the Crysis benchmark program?
guyver33 2 years ago
only stupid people go higher on the i7. you can easily go over 4ghz on the 920. even a 975 (wich is three times the price of a 920) would still have to be overclocked to get to the 4ghz. at this time the 920 has the best bang for your bucks :). you better spend the extra money on better videocards.
PimYuTub 2 years ago
By the way, I hate you. (Nice video, subbed)
diotecktec2 2 years ago
LOL, although my i7 920 is running at 4.1 Ghz.
CarbonEternity 2 years ago
mine is at 4.2ghz Prime95 stable
Playboyer69 2 years ago
Cool, my post was in reply to a kid saying you have the best of everything exept CPU. i was proving him wrong.
Im running an aircooler though.
CarbonEternity 2 years ago
You honestly dont need anything over an i7 920 Unless you just want synthetic benchmarks.
tsneal101 2 years ago
True. i wanted to get what made noticeable impact on games first(graphics cards). Plus i7 for cheap +overclock to near performance of more expensive makes more sense.
Playboyer69 2 years ago
omg the background sounds are class on my headset:P
welshman123456789 2 years ago
same :)
wateva1995 2 years ago
yes it is i am sorry :/
daswada9 2 years ago
its a program you download called crysis benchmark or something
tarkinfish 2 years ago
get Core 2 Quad Extreme QX9775 :)
daswada9 2 years ago
i7 better and cheaper lol
antec12gtx260 2 years ago 2
x16AA in crysis rofl.
Drop in to x4 FPs go from 60 to 120+
snipedaner 2 years ago
x4AA*
snipedaner 2 years ago
what about the average fps without anti-aliasing? Please do a test! lol
halocog 2 years ago
Crysis, Veryhigh, 1680x1050, DX10, 64-bit no AA i get
Min:29.43
Max:69.57
Avg:46.14
Playboyer69 2 years ago
GREAT !!! :)
OMGR4VEN 2 years ago
what software do you use for this
antec12gtx260 2 years ago
It's called the "Crysis Benchmark Tool" just google it.
Playboyer69 2 years ago
just over 3k and that's just the CPU. Not including the monitor, sound system as well as the periperals(mouse,keyboard..etc)
Playboyer69 2 years ago
i expected more fps from 2 295's in sli 0.o
chikendip21 2 years ago 3
reason is because my cpu is a bottlekneck for GTX295 in quadsli. I get 60fps when i overclock the cpu. I would need the extreme edition i7s overclocked. But even then then there still maybe a bottlekneck.
Playboyer69 2 years ago
maybe he haved a bottleneck, maybe using an intel i7 980 extreme and a SSD faster or 2 in RAID 0
YujiHDaddyJ90 1 year ago
how much did u r pc cost ?
prab29999 2 years ago