Has anyone been to the Cape for a launch? I was thinking about going down June 12 for the Atlas 5 launch but could use some info/help on best place to go to see the launch. Any suggestions are welcomed and I can provide my email for lenghty emails! Thank you!
but the US didn't want them in...Now the Chinese have recently learned to space dock and are in the process of building their own space station. We didn't keep China out for petty reason's either. We the US know what can be learned in space and want to keep the Chinese away from it...The X37 guarantees the US military supremacy.
If the US doesn't weaponize space and take the leading edge now...China will later...we need to stay ahead of the game at ALL COSTS. Yes, we built the ISS so a collective group of nations could benefit and learn from space. Coincidence the X37 surfaces AFTER the ISS is completed and the Shuttle cancelled....LMFAO (you go ahead and continue to play the Ostrich game....keep sticking your head in the sand while telling yourself everything will be alright). Also, China tried to get rights to the ISS
It's on a SECRET mission carrying a SECRET payload. SECRECY.... it's how Washington operates. Fuck "We the People".... we are too stupid to understand the importance of what the politicians or military is doing. Don't believe that ? Just ask them.
The current Cold War against China is increasing space exploration. China has successfully launched its own space plane prototype, the news came out shortly after the US Air Force announced the successful test of their advanced X37B space plane, which is widely regarded as a next-generation super weapon that is even more dangerous than atomic bomb.
@luciduspostremo This video is about a weapon. It's a military project and has bellicose purposes. You should not be surprised with the presence of warmongers.
First of: The x-37B project looks awesome. Second: still no need to "wish" for conflict and war. third: more dangerous than an atomic bomb? nope. But couple this project with the a-bomb... and you got it
@YoshiFan501 yes but the current cold war does not pretend to be about some kind of ideological garbage, it's openly for world domination motivated by greed. In many ways the Cold War 2 shows a more mature humanity.
I agree with some of you. And looking at it from an economic stand point, it makes sense that NASA was needed to kick start space exploration. The economies of scale are sooo large (look it up), that it wasn't feasible for everyone and their cousin to have a space program, it needed HUGE amounts of funding thrown at it. Now the barriers to entry are much lower, and companies SHOULD take it over in many aspects where the economies of scale are lower.
Lowering funding for government run space programs will be good in the long run. NASA does things that tend to be overpriced. Private companies can do it a lot cheaper and efficiently.
Yeah, lets just stay on earth and not spread ourselves into the cosmos, thereby solidifying humanity's greatest achievement - colonizing space. Lets just stay here.
Honestly, if there was going to be no attempt to further that, I'd probably kill myself. I'm not even kidding. Going to space is a reason to live. Not only that, but it does too lead to technological developments in daily life that wouldn't otherwise exist.
@hellomate639 Amen brother! Too many monekys don't wana leave their tree. Space is humanities only hope. What the hell are we waiting for?? Alah? God? Jesus? Santa?? We can do this!
The AtlasV is one of the best rockets for cargo. However, Falcon9 is better for people. The reason is with 9 engines you can shut down up to three engines during launch and it can still reach LEO. The new Delta rockets also look very good, as long as they don't use solids.
I do wonder though if, in the event of the launch being aborted some time after lift off, it can be quickly separated from the lift vehicle and flown back to a runway.
I read in New Scientist this week that the X37b has finally made a remote controlled landing. A first for America but 22 years after the Russians did the same with their unmanned shuttle.
The USAF remain tight lipped about what it will be finally used for but there are many possibilities including refueling satelites and rescue of stranded astronauts. Compared with the space shuttle this is a low cost alternative with none of the problems associated with manned flight.
Good shot. We can learn a lot from this kind of testing, without risking a human life. Cost: It must be considerably cheaper to do a non-human launch. In other words, adding the technology to fly a person up there must be really significant. So I say, shoot a number of "robotic" flights before even considering a human (piloted) shot. I just hope the debris from the launch lands over water. Learn from mistakes of the robotic shots, then add a human for the final flight(s).
@belankheet That's actually what they do and have been doing for quite some time. In the early days they used chimps before sending a man in space. And your also right about it being alot cheaper to do unmanned flights than manned flights. Automated machines have far greater tolerances to heat and cold, they don't need to eat, or breath oxygen, they don't get board or home sick or feel fear.
@d177 - There are no "everyday" benefits from the federal swine known as NASA. Cut it and get rid of it. Colossal waste of tax payer money. If you want it, you pay for it but don't make us pay for your people and their bloated public pensions that are ruining this country. The airforce could take over all of NASA's functions and be just as effective without 90% of NASA's current staff--you included.
@chrikac Your a fool! Everything you do in your day to day life.NASA most likly help create or fine tune the products. Cell phone? GPS? TV? and just about everyting that we know about the universe! Would you like listening the talk radio for entertainment? I shure as hell wouldnt. Or not even knowing what the sun is made out of? It would be like living like a cave man. Only caring about you can eat each day and who you can f@$k.
lol, do they think we are that stupid? The video cuts of about three seconds before we can see the spacecraft. It makes me think there is something enclosed that they do not want us to see. They let us see the payload on a normal Atlas.
The reason that there is no video feed of the shuttle separation is that there is no available video feed. look through every video recording/feed of a space craft launch. they are so high into the atmosphere that one will be unable to see the actual separation
Interesting how they had the optics available and the ultra clear skies for us to see the PLF jettison event and then the exposed X-37B vehicle which would have been a great visual!. But they cut the feed so "we" would not see the X-37B in its configuration atop the payload adapter. That's DoD for ya! But I understand. Regardless, it was great launch.
This is hardly surprising. NASA usually gets things right. Why don't they give NASA more money. For the benefits you yankees get, NASA should be the largest funded organization you posses.
@logicCplusplus why would it head for russia? oh i get it your one of those people who think the US should bomb people just to do it with no motive. you're father should have been sterilized and so should you.
Actually, I'm Polish and there is a motive. Russians are murderers of the highest order. Russians have killed more people than Nazi Germany and any Muslim terrorists combined.
@logicCplusplus yeah of course they did...decades ago but you would love to kill civilians many years later after the fact. You are a horrible individual regardless of what you are for thinking that Russia needs to repent with the blood of innocent victims.
@SphinxTheGeek the US does produce its own engines, such as the RS-68 on the Delta IV. The Russians marketed their RD-33's and 180's and NASA was impressed by their similarities to the RL-10's the Atlas had used since its development. The lower maintenence and cost to mount the Russian engines on the Atlas was the chief decision maker to use these engines.
American engines are higher tech and cost and Congress would have interfered unnecessarily if NASA had not this choice itself.
@RicochetManchester "Big Dumb Boosters" have been the mainstay of the Exploration effort ever since the program began. They're good because the more that they fly, the more help in "man rating" the booster to fly Astronauts.
X-37B Nuke/Laser Carrying Spy Drone made by PhantomWorks that was recently launched by the Pentagon into Space IS EXPOSED..
"US military with the X-37B Drone, suddenly has an interest in blowing things up at anytime anywhere in the world. Pentagon has copied a plan considered by the Nazis for the purpose of bombing USA."
and nasa should really stand for nazi consedering all of the science in those rockets come from the v2 rocket and werner von braun who was a what ,thants right a bloddy nazi and the whole lot of them were nazis and for those of you who dont belive what i have wrote ,look into this ,its called project paper clip
FYI this wasn't NASA it was an Air Force project. BTW NASA only gets 1/2 of 1 penny of every tax dollar so cutting their budget would save virtually nothing.
...the arms race in spce was top secret for 60 years, now its in the open....signaling the coming of wars on a massive scale....................NO TO NUCLEAR WAR U.S .MORONS, FUCK OFF ISRAEL, IF YOU USE NUKES THERE WILL BE NO PLACE FOR YOU TO HIDE
Rumors have been circulating that the X-37 may be a sort of orbital predator drone, or delivery device for similar remote controlled devices that could be deployed anywhere on the planet within minutes without requiring air transport that could potentially be intercepted by surface to air missiles. But there's no evidence to support this claim, and many say it's laughable even, saying this theory underestimates the difficulty of reentry into Earth's atmosphere.
Though the project was originally started by NASA, when the space agency was unable to keep the project afloat, the Air Force stepped in and took it over. And the timing of the X-37's implementation is something that's raising quite a few eyebrows as well. China is showing a noticeably increased interest in the militarization of space. Why would a military organization rescue a project that had been dropped almost four years ago and see it to its end without announcing its purpose?
this is all wrong this sucker brake 4 pieces off at once..we saw the launch from vero Florida..there hiding the break away sequence for some reason.but what i can say is when the break away happen this little sucker hauled butt and was gone quick after breakaway
@iamthe1337est Would you rather see everything on Youtube along with 100,000 of the US's closest enemies? it's a "secret" space plane for a reason lol.
Maybe you should look into the enormous number of benefits you enjoy everyday from NASA research and space development before saying it's a waste of money.
The money generated/saved by the creation of these products/materials outweighs the (pretty poor) budget the NASA survives on many, many times over.
Nasa's interest of developing space technologies that only benefit us in the outer space field isn't worth it's money. Who cares what's on mars, on the moon, on that asteroid that would completely obliterate the planet. Put that effort elsewhere.
Project-whatever of revisiting the moon? Waste o money.
I dunno, i can live being a farmer :D 100k a year isn't too bad XD
Nasa is great. But the need better imagineers and money managers on their larger projects. EPIC scale projects.
I think you misunderstand, I'm referring to technologies that we use on earth i.e. medicines, fabrics, even something as simple as smoke detectors are derived from NASA tech.
@peepeevagi Research into detecting biological traces on Mars brought about biosensor technology now being used to monitor water quality. The sensor can detect even minute amounts of targeted, disease-causing bacteria, viruses, and parasites. It can alert organizations to potential biological hazards in water used for agriculture, food and beverages, beaches and lakes—within hours instead of the days required by conventional laboratory methods.
@peepeevagi In 1967, NASA contracted with Celanese Corporation, of New York, to develop a line of fire-resistant textiles for use in space suits and vehicles. The resulting technology, PBI, is now used in numerous firefighting, military, motor sports, and other applications.
@peepeevagi An experiment into regenerative ecosystems evolved into one of the most widespread NASA spinoffs of all time—a method for manufacturing an algae-based food supplement that provides the nutrients previously only available in breast milk. A NASA partner now manufactures this supplement, and it can be found in over 90 percent of the infant formulas sold in the United States, as well as those sold in over 65 other countries.
@dl77 yea they just need to release the good shit, and stop keeping the New tech for them selves. Waste of money, nah. but the secrets need to be let out.
Smoke detectors, home insulation, body imaging, laser heart surgery, LEDs, artificial limbs, satellite communications, higher quality baby food, advanced water purification systems, flat screen technology, solar power, earthquake prediction, sewage treatment, pacemakers, engine lubricant, rescue cutters, etc, etc. Are those few things enough for you or do you need a list of the other 100's of benefits?
All these either came directly from or benefitted from NASA research.
@dl77 they didnt invent non of it no it was all doctors and scientists not stupid army or nasa trust me every 1 of them was invented by some jow blow but per chest by the army, so before you speak think and you can check every singe thing u posted and check who was the real inventor not you inventive imagination putting stupid shit up
Firstly, try and learn to write in English, it'd be a great help so I don't have to spend half an hour deciphering some kid's phenomenally boneheaded comments.
Secondly, who exactly do you think work at NASA? Road sweepers? Dinner ladies?! It's a huge scientific organisation full of, guess what, scientists! Are you seriously trying to suggest that NASA have gone around and stole other people's inventions for the past 50+ years?!
Tell you what sonny. Why don't you just admit that you're wrong, go away and stop embarrassing yourself further in front of all these people and leave discussions on this topic to those of us who actually understand it.
In fact if you want some help then send me your address and I'll send you a dictionary. I'll even make sure it's in big print and full of pictures for you to colour in. I'm sure that your teachers will certainly appreciate it.
@raffi7900 You could the biggest fool or tool, I say both in here. Where do you get your info? After somking some meth with the hobo living in your car with you? You shouldnt even have the right to use your pc to look at this shit! Go back to first grade and start a new life before you fall flat on your face trying to take one step at a time!
@daredeveldave Guess what? Your already at your job sucking everyones dick bitch! If the truth hurts you, then you should have some put a pillow across your face and make you fall asleep. If you think your thoughts are rights, then you need to re-think tour life and chill and talk to new people. So for being so mean but damn man wake up!
Agreed, it is people such as those behind NASA who ensure the continual progression and evolution of mankind. And i'm sure anybody even those who believe it to be a waste of money would be proud to have a child who achieved anything near as great as Neal Armstrong or Buzz Aldrun.
If you are in favour of regression instead of progression, then your next home should be a cave.
Yes, most people do not understand that the economic return on NASA makes it the ONLY government agency that actually turns a profit, so to speak. But that profit lies with the public in the form of businesses and manufacturers making products for us everyday. Super glue, duct tape, aluminum alloy rims for cars and trucks, as well as those alloys for auto engines and the list goes on almost endlessly.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nasa is such a huge waste of money but they sure do create spectacular things. And, yay, we're the only country in the world with Spaceplane technology and ability!
I hope they develop a manned version after this more than proof of concept. Too bad the CRV X-38 didn't make it. Though I thought the glider-chute method was a risky return.
Bezmyślnie zaśmiecają przestrzeń kosmiczna, USA nie myśli
TheMakuMM 4 days ago
Has anyone been to the Cape for a launch? I was thinking about going down June 12 for the Atlas 5 launch but could use some info/help on best place to go to see the launch. Any suggestions are welcomed and I can provide my email for lenghty emails! Thank you!
kev8338 1 month ago
but the US didn't want them in...Now the Chinese have recently learned to space dock and are in the process of building their own space station. We didn't keep China out for petty reason's either. We the US know what can be learned in space and want to keep the Chinese away from it...The X37 guarantees the US military supremacy.
stealth090 1 month ago
If the US doesn't weaponize space and take the leading edge now...China will later...we need to stay ahead of the game at ALL COSTS. Yes, we built the ISS so a collective group of nations could benefit and learn from space. Coincidence the X37 surfaces AFTER the ISS is completed and the Shuttle cancelled....LMFAO (you go ahead and continue to play the Ostrich game....keep sticking your head in the sand while telling yourself everything will be alright). Also, China tried to get rights to the ISS
stealth090 1 month ago
@stealth090 Fortunately, Obama administration IS weaponizing space.
WarmongerWW3 4 weeks ago
It's on a SECRET mission carrying a SECRET payload. SECRECY.... it's how Washington operates. Fuck "We the People".... we are too stupid to understand the importance of what the politicians or military is doing. Don't believe that ? Just ask them.
nerblebun 3 months ago
The X-37c is to be armed with 2 phaser banks and photon topedos. But no warp drive but will have inpulse engines.
athacliath2011 5 months ago
Check this video - x37b passes over new zealand
ronfonteine 9 months ago
@Starwing1272 not to mention that satellite/global communications depend on the matinence provided by astronauts.
thegarlands04 9 months ago
The current Cold War against China is increasing space exploration. China has successfully launched its own space plane prototype, the news came out shortly after the US Air Force announced the successful test of their advanced X37B space plane, which is widely regarded as a next-generation super weapon that is even more dangerous than atomic bomb.
WarmongerWW3 10 months ago 9
@WarmongerWW3
Comes from a guy named warmonger, with that profile of yours... get a life instead of hoing for conflicts
luciduspostremo 7 months ago
@luciduspostremo This video is about a weapon. It's a military project and has bellicose purposes. You should not be surprised with the presence of warmongers.
WarmongerWW3 7 months ago
@WarmongerWW3
First of: The x-37B project looks awesome. Second: still no need to "wish" for conflict and war. third: more dangerous than an atomic bomb? nope. But couple this project with the a-bomb... and you got it
luciduspostremo 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@luciduspostremo "The x-37B project looks awesome." I totally agree with you. "still no need to "wish" for conflict and war. "
I totally disagree with you. If you do not want to play... you do not create the toy in the first place >:)
WarmongerWW3 7 months ago
@WarmongerWW3 we have a cold war against china?
YoshiFan501 1 month ago
@YoshiFan501 yes but the current cold war does not pretend to be about some kind of ideological garbage, it's openly for world domination motivated by greed. In many ways the Cold War 2 shows a more mature humanity.
WarmongerWW3 2 weeks ago
I agree with some of you. And looking at it from an economic stand point, it makes sense that NASA was needed to kick start space exploration. The economies of scale are sooo large (look it up), that it wasn't feasible for everyone and their cousin to have a space program, it needed HUGE amounts of funding thrown at it. Now the barriers to entry are much lower, and companies SHOULD take it over in many aspects where the economies of scale are lower.
threenightstand 11 months ago
@Starwing1272
Lowering funding for government run space programs will be good in the long run. NASA does things that tend to be overpriced. Private companies can do it a lot cheaper and efficiently.
nicpetnic 11 months ago
This is a deadly machine and whoever had it built should be in prison. Works with HAARP!
fight2legalize 11 months ago
it's amazing how clean and streamlined the launchpad is, completely contrasting the Saturn v's
A4moondoggy 11 months ago
Yeah, lets just stay on earth and not spread ourselves into the cosmos, thereby solidifying humanity's greatest achievement - colonizing space. Lets just stay here.
Honestly, if there was going to be no attempt to further that, I'd probably kill myself. I'm not even kidding. Going to space is a reason to live. Not only that, but it does too lead to technological developments in daily life that wouldn't otherwise exist.
hellomate639 11 months ago
@hellomate639 Amen brother! Too many monekys don't wana leave their tree. Space is humanities only hope. What the hell are we waiting for?? Alah? God? Jesus? Santa?? We can do this!
Mcgatord 11 months ago
The AtlasV is one of the best rockets for cargo. However, Falcon9 is better for people. The reason is with 9 engines you can shut down up to three engines during launch and it can still reach LEO. The new Delta rockets also look very good, as long as they don't use solids.
ti994apc 1 year ago
@boogiebuddy01 Any ideas, let us know :-)
seg9585 1 year ago
They use russian made engines with so far 100% success rate.
Hatinonthehaters 1 year ago
It burned Moscow.
sangwria 1 year ago
Quite similiar to miniture Buran "Spacecraft" Launch by rockert, flight & landing in automated mode.
maxinfly 1 year ago
Bye bye money!!!
dackjack 1 year ago
Амеры пидары....
MrRussiaangel 1 year ago
I do wonder though if, in the event of the launch being aborted some time after lift off, it can be quickly separated from the lift vehicle and flown back to a runway.
tpsossff 1 year ago
I read in New Scientist this week that the X37b has finally made a remote controlled landing. A first for America but 22 years after the Russians did the same with their unmanned shuttle.
The USAF remain tight lipped about what it will be finally used for but there are many possibilities including refueling satelites and rescue of stranded astronauts. Compared with the space shuttle this is a low cost alternative with none of the problems associated with manned flight.
tpsossff 1 year ago
The radio sounds like the Counter Strike 1.6 bots.
NFSCalex 1 year ago
Good shot. We can learn a lot from this kind of testing, without risking a human life. Cost: It must be considerably cheaper to do a non-human launch. In other words, adding the technology to fly a person up there must be really significant. So I say, shoot a number of "robotic" flights before even considering a human (piloted) shot. I just hope the debris from the launch lands over water. Learn from mistakes of the robotic shots, then add a human for the final flight(s).
belankheet 1 year ago
@belankheet That's actually what they do and have been doing for quite some time. In the early days they used chimps before sending a man in space. And your also right about it being alot cheaper to do unmanned flights than manned flights. Automated machines have far greater tolerances to heat and cold, they don't need to eat, or breath oxygen, they don't get board or home sick or feel fear.
Antiworld23 1 year ago
@jewlzorjay NASA sees the continuation of mankind huh? So then it is the military that seeks it's end!
tejimun 1 year ago
they cut the video
Conservativepacheat 1 year ago
@daredeveldave @raffi7900 FLAME WAR!!!!!!
homer46303 1 year ago
:P i dont get it its sooooo secret and right on youtube LOL XD
mrgilamonyet 1 year ago
why does the flames go side ways 2:56
skateboy159 1 year ago
@d177 - There are no "everyday" benefits from the federal swine known as NASA. Cut it and get rid of it. Colossal waste of tax payer money. If you want it, you pay for it but don't make us pay for your people and their bloated public pensions that are ruining this country. The airforce could take over all of NASA's functions and be just as effective without 90% of NASA's current staff--you included.
chrikac 1 year ago
@chrikac Your a fool! Everything you do in your day to day life.NASA most likly help create or fine tune the products. Cell phone? GPS? TV? and just about everyting that we know about the universe! Would you like listening the talk radio for entertainment? I shure as hell wouldnt. Or not even knowing what the sun is made out of? It would be like living like a cave man. Only caring about you can eat each day and who you can f@$k.
daredeveldave 1 year ago
Does NASA ever have the ISS in position to film launches?
MrVanagon1 1 year ago
Nuke it from orbit
Devilboy668 1 year ago
haha where is the payload scene? duuh.. americans... always hidding things from us..
GameNewbie 1 year ago
Its earths only spaceship,,, built for war..not peace ... :(
animus999 1 year ago
@animus999 War is the best incentive for the scientific and technological development.
WW3 consequences: An amazing and spectacular scientific and technological development. maybe the unification of relativity and quantum mechanics
WarmongerWW3 10 months ago
@WarmongerWW3
Or the near destruction of powerful nations.
FrostbitexP 1 week ago
maybe we are gonna show iran that we can bomb their nuke sites from florida hahaha
DJNastie 1 year ago
lol, do they think we are that stupid? The video cuts of about three seconds before we can see the spacecraft. It makes me think there is something enclosed that they do not want us to see. They let us see the payload on a normal Atlas.
tjohn6041 1 year ago
@tjohn6041 wow, thats very observant of you. It is an Air Force project, not NASA - not public.
FailedSquare 1 year ago
@tjohn6041
The reason that there is no video feed of the shuttle separation is that there is no available video feed. look through every video recording/feed of a space craft launch. they are so high into the atmosphere that one will be unable to see the actual separation
treetrunks1554 1 year ago
What about antigravity technology? Why hidden from us?
Hansolo60 1 year ago
pew pew pew
nicodalimonte 1 year ago 2
Interesting how they had the optics available and the ultra clear skies for us to see the PLF jettison event and then the exposed X-37B vehicle which would have been a great visual!. But they cut the feed so "we" would not see the X-37B in its configuration atop the payload adapter. That's DoD for ya! But I understand. Regardless, it was great launch.
hartonium 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THERES AN IPAD GIVEAWAY ON MY CHANNEL
bestelectronicreview 1 year ago
Does rockets have to be that huge to enter space? I wanna be very first civilian to send a modified Estes rocket into space, lol.
n3rdbear 1 year ago
1 step clooooser to star trek =)
darkangelmak 1 year ago 2
@darkangelmak nah, just one century closer to star trek
dodow1234 1 year ago
This is hardly surprising. NASA usually gets things right. Why don't they give NASA more money. For the benefits you yankees get, NASA should be the largest funded organization you posses.
IdleGod 1 year ago
Too bad its not a nuclear warhead and its not heading for Russia
logicCplusplus 1 year ago
@logicCplusplus you fucking ignorant idiot
nixxxon18 1 year ago
@logicCplusplus why would it head for russia? oh i get it your one of those people who think the US should bomb people just to do it with no motive. you're father should have been sterilized and so should you.
AvO156 1 year ago
@AvO156
Actually, I'm Polish and there is a motive. Russians are murderers of the highest order. Russians have killed more people than Nazi Germany and any Muslim terrorists combined.
logicCplusplus 1 year ago
@logicCplusplus yeah of course they did...decades ago but you would love to kill civilians many years later after the fact. You are a horrible individual regardless of what you are for thinking that Russia needs to repent with the blood of innocent victims.
AvO156 1 year ago
@logicCplusplus why not heading to your house instead
dodow1234 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@logicCplusplus
Too bad its not a nuclear warhead and its not heading for Poland.
zoltan6561 1 year ago
this camera has a awesome zoom!!!!!
wiktorkramer 1 year ago 2
its a secret but YOU paid for it .....
ceez561 1 year ago
@SphinxTheGeek the US does produce its own engines, such as the RS-68 on the Delta IV. The Russians marketed their RD-33's and 180's and NASA was impressed by their similarities to the RL-10's the Atlas had used since its development. The lower maintenence and cost to mount the Russian engines on the Atlas was the chief decision maker to use these engines.
American engines are higher tech and cost and Congress would have interfered unnecessarily if NASA had not this choice itself.
AblePumper 1 year ago
BEAUTIFUL LAUNCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AblePumper 1 year ago
true heroes right there they risk there lives 4 science
FIGHTFANNERD3 1 year ago
@FIGHTFANNERD3 Their just launching and testing air force technology. Hardy science.
googoo120 1 year ago
great vid space is future
FIGHTFANNERD3 1 year ago
It's a shame in lots of ways that we're back to Big Dumb Rockets. But man, this is pretty. 8)
RicochetManchester 1 year ago
@RicochetManchester "Big Dumb Boosters" have been the mainstay of the Exploration effort ever since the program began. They're good because the more that they fly, the more help in "man rating" the booster to fly Astronauts.
AblePumper 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
X-37B Nuke/Laser Carrying Spy Drone made by PhantomWorks that was recently launched by the Pentagon into Space IS EXPOSED..
"US military with the X-37B Drone, suddenly has an interest in blowing things up at anytime anywhere in the world. Pentagon has copied a plan considered by the Nazis for the purpose of bombing USA."
theregister. co. uk/2010/04/22/boost_ glide_arclight
en. wikipedia. org/wiki/X-20_ Dyna-Soar
en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Silbervogel
en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip
halcyon0830 1 year ago
and nasa should really stand for nazi consedering all of the science in those rockets come from the v2 rocket and werner von braun who was a what ,thants right a bloddy nazi and the whole lot of them were nazis and for those of you who dont belive what i have wrote ,look into this ,its called project paper clip
JUNGLEOFEDEN 1 year ago
you know, if this does work out, we will have created the 3rd reusable spacecraft (does not include the other space shuttles) ever.
Lazybum450 1 year ago
россии пиздец гтовимся к смерти нах ,с нашими технологиями мы в глубокой жопе very nice ))))))
pavel280488AA 1 year ago
I dont care we become macross world soon
secanjou 1 year ago
3 2 Ready Steady GO!
Zoomer30 1 year ago
During liftoff it appears one of the umbilicals got caught on the vehicle.
seg9585 1 year ago
@SphinxTheGeek Go cry to someone who gives a fuck!
journeyway86 1 year ago
Nice.
journeyway86 1 year ago
Awesome the Final Frontier man! woohoo!
ReadmanJ 1 year ago
FYI this wasn't NASA it was an Air Force project. BTW NASA only gets 1/2 of 1 penny of every tax dollar so cutting their budget would save virtually nothing.
henik9 1 year ago
Good thing they launched it while it was still dark out. We wouldn't want anyone to know about this , LOL.
airdriver 1 year ago
ENDWARTIME!
NOVUSxORDOxSECLORUM 1 year ago 2
O.o'
Okay well i was wrong then XD
Nasa does amazing shit, without hardly any money. It's Just the Air force wasting it all away again >.>
What next? Lasers in space?
peepeevagi 1 year ago
...the arms race in spce was top secret for 60 years, now its in the open....signaling the coming of wars on a massive scale....................NO TO NUCLEAR WAR U.S .MORONS, FUCK OFF ISRAEL, IF YOU USE NUKES THERE WILL BE NO PLACE FOR YOU TO HIDE
EasternGateGuardian 1 year ago
Comment removed
SKYSURVEYOR 1 year ago
Rumors have been circulating that the X-37 may be a sort of orbital predator drone, or delivery device for similar remote controlled devices that could be deployed anywhere on the planet within minutes without requiring air transport that could potentially be intercepted by surface to air missiles. But there's no evidence to support this claim, and many say it's laughable even, saying this theory underestimates the difficulty of reentry into Earth's atmosphere.
boobear19962007 1 year ago 2
Though the project was originally started by NASA, when the space agency was unable to keep the project afloat, the Air Force stepped in and took it over. And the timing of the X-37's implementation is something that's raising quite a few eyebrows as well. China is showing a noticeably increased interest in the militarization of space. Why would a military organization rescue a project that had been dropped almost four years ago and see it to its end without announcing its purpose?
boobear19962007 1 year ago 3
this is all wrong this sucker brake 4 pieces off at once..we saw the launch from vero Florida..there hiding the break away sequence for some reason.but what i can say is when the break away happen this little sucker hauled butt and was gone quick after breakaway
boobear19962007 1 year ago 2
Didn't let us see the real footage of the X-37B...If that's not suspicious I don't know what is.
iamthe1337est 1 year ago
@iamthe1337est Would you rather see everything on Youtube along with 100,000 of the US's closest enemies? it's a "secret" space plane for a reason lol.
Kingsknight531 1 year ago 14
@pepeevagi
Maybe you should look into the enormous number of benefits you enjoy everyday from NASA research and space development before saying it's a waste of money.
The money generated/saved by the creation of these products/materials outweighs the (pretty poor) budget the NASA survives on many, many times over.
dl77 1 year ago 66
Nasa's interest of developing space technologies that only benefit us in the outer space field isn't worth it's money. Who cares what's on mars, on the moon, on that asteroid that would completely obliterate the planet. Put that effort elsewhere.
Project-whatever of revisiting the moon? Waste o money.
I dunno, i can live being a farmer :D 100k a year isn't too bad XD
Nasa is great. But the need better imagineers and money managers on their larger projects. EPIC scale projects.
peepeevagi 1 year ago
@peepeevagi
I think you misunderstand, I'm referring to technologies that we use on earth i.e. medicines, fabrics, even something as simple as smoke detectors are derived from NASA tech.
dl77 1 year ago
@peepeevagi Research into detecting biological traces on Mars brought about biosensor technology now being used to monitor water quality. The sensor can detect even minute amounts of targeted, disease-causing bacteria, viruses, and parasites. It can alert organizations to potential biological hazards in water used for agriculture, food and beverages, beaches and lakes—within hours instead of the days required by conventional laboratory methods.
modelun12 1 year ago
@peepeevagi In 1967, NASA contracted with Celanese Corporation, of New York, to develop a line of fire-resistant textiles for use in space suits and vehicles. The resulting technology, PBI, is now used in numerous firefighting, military, motor sports, and other applications.
modelun12 1 year ago
@peepeevagi An experiment into regenerative ecosystems evolved into one of the most widespread NASA spinoffs of all time—a method for manufacturing an algae-based food supplement that provides the nutrients previously only available in breast milk. A NASA partner now manufactures this supplement, and it can be found in over 90 percent of the infant formulas sold in the United States, as well as those sold in over 65 other countries.
modelun12 1 year ago
now THAT convinces me. I guess the Nasa space dream is a good thing.
But as soon as they try to play god....
peepeevagi 1 year ago
@peepeevagi you are no human, your a fucking zombie. go to heaven, because you have no sense of curiosity.
350z350zify 1 year ago
I'd fund a excavation of the earth's core if i could. Space is boring. The real adventure lies beneath your own feet :D
peepeevagi 1 year ago
@peepeevagi the core is fascinating too. but we know whats there. its 8,000 miles of magma. not whats right above our heads
350z350zify 1 year ago
Yeah but imagine, what's really at the very 'center' of the core? There's supposed to be liquid nickel O.o
peepeevagi 1 year ago
@dl77 yea they just need to release the good shit, and stop keeping the New tech for them selves. Waste of money, nah. but the secrets need to be let out.
maydaymosley 1 year ago
@dl77 so can you tell us what it is that we enjoy from so grate nasa pls , i hope you dont mean the fake moon landing s
raffi7900 1 year ago
@raffi7900
Smoke detectors, home insulation, body imaging, laser heart surgery, LEDs, artificial limbs, satellite communications, higher quality baby food, advanced water purification systems, flat screen technology, solar power, earthquake prediction, sewage treatment, pacemakers, engine lubricant, rescue cutters, etc, etc. Are those few things enough for you or do you need a list of the other 100's of benefits?
All these either came directly from or benefitted from NASA research.
dl77 1 year ago
@dl77 they didnt invent non of it no it was all doctors and scientists not stupid army or nasa trust me every 1 of them was invented by some jow blow but per chest by the army, so before you speak think and you can check every singe thing u posted and check who was the real inventor not you inventive imagination putting stupid shit up
raffi7900 1 year ago
@raffi7900
Firstly, try and learn to write in English, it'd be a great help so I don't have to spend half an hour deciphering some kid's phenomenally boneheaded comments.
Secondly, who exactly do you think work at NASA? Road sweepers? Dinner ladies?! It's a huge scientific organisation full of, guess what, scientists! Are you seriously trying to suggest that NASA have gone around and stole other people's inventions for the past 50+ years?!
dl77 1 year ago
@dl77 it looks like you post dis info the way your channel look s dumb shill
raffi7900 1 year ago
@raffi7900
Tell you what sonny. Why don't you just admit that you're wrong, go away and stop embarrassing yourself further in front of all these people and leave discussions on this topic to those of us who actually understand it.
In fact if you want some help then send me your address and I'll send you a dictionary. I'll even make sure it's in big print and full of pictures for you to colour in. I'm sure that your teachers will certainly appreciate it.
dl77 1 year ago
@raffi7900 You could the biggest fool or tool, I say both in here. Where do you get your info? After somking some meth with the hobo living in your car with you? You shouldnt even have the right to use your pc to look at this shit! Go back to first grade and start a new life before you fall flat on your face trying to take one step at a time!
daredeveldave 1 year ago
@daredeveldave you suck cock for a living so what can i say it s your job , get down on your knees and do what your told dumb fuck , good job you do
raffi7900 1 year ago
@daredeveldave Guess what? Your already at your job sucking everyones dick bitch! If the truth hurts you, then you should have some put a pillow across your face and make you fall asleep. If you think your thoughts are rights, then you need to re-think tour life and chill and talk to new people. So for being so mean but damn man wake up!
daredeveldave 1 year ago
@dl77
Agreed, it is people such as those behind NASA who ensure the continual progression and evolution of mankind. And i'm sure anybody even those who believe it to be a waste of money would be proud to have a child who achieved anything near as great as Neal Armstrong or Buzz Aldrun.
If you are in favour of regression instead of progression, then your next home should be a cave.
jewlzorjay 1 year ago
@dl77 not to mention the huge cuts obama made to their budget...and no more mission to the moon. Its quite depressing.
Blu3sKLUZ 1 year ago
@dl77
Well said!
Burnsengine 1 year ago
@dl77
Yes, most people do not understand that the economic return on NASA makes it the ONLY government agency that actually turns a profit, so to speak. But that profit lies with the public in the form of businesses and manufacturers making products for us everyday. Super glue, duct tape, aluminum alloy rims for cars and trucks, as well as those alloys for auto engines and the list goes on almost endlessly.
daveo211 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nasa is such a huge waste of money but they sure do create spectacular things. And, yay, we're the only country in the world with Spaceplane technology and ability!
peepeevagi 1 year ago
@peepeevagi
Its not NASA project , its project of US Air Force .
NemanjaMonarch 1 year ago
@peepeevagi Actually, I do believe that this new thing is actually Air Force made (as is the Atlas V) This is what I heard anyways.
sleepy7895 1 year ago
The air force wastes too much money D:
It'd be okay if it was nasa :D
peepeevagi 1 year ago
@peepeevagi dont tell me, u didnt get ur gubmint cheese this month
1320crusier 1 year ago
@peepeevagi what a stupid ass comment you moron
FIGHTFANNERD3 1 year ago
I hope they develop a manned version after this more than proof of concept. Too bad the CRV X-38 didn't make it. Though I thought the glider-chute method was a risky return.
TS7019 1 year ago