Added: 4 years ago
From: GRIDKEEPER
Views: 146,831
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (258)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Makes you laugh when people jump at the chance of making stupid remarks without really thinking or question anything no wonder half the human race is DOOMED.

  • i know this ship too

  • I'm a believer, but too short, too snowy, and too fake.

  • Comment removed

  • lenard photos all faked ...

  • @daendiscoming what makes you say that?

  • Klingon Battlecruiser of course.

  • Look at it people! It's a freakin' helicopter!

  • @creepsgirl Are you serious? If so which helicopter do you think it is?

  • @GRIDKEEPER It's a Chinook, moron.

  • @Evilmike42 That's hilarious. didn't know that Chinooks could fly through space.

  • @creepsgirl That's no helicopter, moron.

  • FUCKING SHEEPS!!

  • haha that is casually a whale in the sea being filmed from a plane

  • one small step for armstrong one GIANT LIE for Earth

  • youtube needs to delete videos if they have shitloads of dislikes like this one

  • @thirteeeeeeen I've shown mor evideos of these in space and proven they are being filmed from a scope. Just because your brain can't compute it doesn't mean it should be removed as many others are unable to compute it also.

  • A great lot of people, unfortunately, are full of crap. Also, many are in beligerant denial, and will not believe the truth, at any cost. Here is a quote:

    "If you are going to tell people the truth, you had better make them laugh, or else they'll kill you." --George Bernard Shaw

    Now... What happened to John?

  • @CrazyBear65 MKULtra made him go all crazy. I could have carried on filming the moon but don't have the money for a scope. Have told dozens of people how to do it on the net and not one person has ever got back to me to say they've had a go using the same method. He never showed me how to fim the ships but i did look at them live through the scope which is why I show the films.

  • @lifepod2036

    He mirrored the video of the breakdown of Colombia.

  • @Snowwie88 That's a ridiculous accusation.

  • Star SHIP Enterprise. Star Trek is the name of the show.

  • Some guy made a telescope and camcorder that was powerful enough to capture these object on the out skirts of space he has his own channel with loads of these objects he says there interstella craft.

  • This looks nothing like the Enterprise. Or anything for that matter. Could be a bug squashed against a window for all I know.

  • Sorry but you lost me at Robbies big gurning face.

  • looks more like the reliant with its warp nacels pointing down

  • What the fuck is with robbie at the end, trying to tell us something lol

  • I don't get which bit is supposed to look like the Enterprise.

  • @lifepod2036 That's moronic!

  • The "secret space program" is no secret. NASA was always a propaganda spin-off of the military's real space program. The military has it's own satellites some of which are public knowledge. But most of what the military/industrial complex engages in goes far beyond any NASA project. More importanly, these technologies are private, not public property. Like Area 51, they belong to a consortium of private military contractors which is why they are never part of the public record.

  • ignore gaykeeper's vids and remarks, just another dumb kid who believes anything above the ground is an alien ship

  • @spymak7 So the startrek enterprise is an alien craft is it? Listen to yourself, many of these craft were built by the NSA wheras many have never been identified leaving many unanswered questions.

  • @spymak7

    Keep ridiculing that which you small mind can't comprehend; it'll get you where you need to be, which is nowhere.

  • @randallcaster

    Wow, you almost constructed a full sentence there, and all by yourself.

    Well. Good for you, kid.

    Keep being a sheople.

  • YEA, IME VERY CONFUSED TOO, ITS JUST A SPACE SHUTTLE OR A JET PLANE, THAT HAS BEEN EDITED TO LOOK TRANSLUCENT..

  • Kirk to Enterprise...BEAM.ME.UP!

  • It doesnt look like the Enterprise. It looks Cardassian to me.

  • MOONRAKER! watch moonraker and go to the part where they are heading to the moon and find a secret space station that is totally unknown to people on earth.

    this must be the "nonterrestrial officers" space station Gary was talking about!!!...but why? to fight off aliens so we cant have contact and become free from dependencies,and have access to a true knowledge base?! everything seems to be designed around one thing...to control us.

  • @lifepod2036 That's ok but you're seriously mistaken. It was filmed in 2008 and there are other videos on my account showing it on other days.

  • @lifepod2036 Please don't be so ridiculous.

  • whoaaa!!! watching this while listening imperial march is just awesome!!!

  • looks like an oil rig

  • R: man will space walk

  • I wish I knew.

  • i love star trek...

  • i don't think this is ufo. Nikola Tesla, beam weapon concept?

  • "Reephenbaker" , are you legally blind? You must be because I live way, way up north and I can assure you that this solid object is no "Aurora Borealis". This huge structure has been filmed time and time again by other "Telescope Videographers" from around the world. You really don't have any idea what you are talking about.

  • looks more lke the Columbia when she broke up on re-entry.. to me

  • It's one object. Wren't there smoke trails coming off the shuttle when it broke up. Also this was filmed in 2008.

  • I dont think the objects are solid, just some kind of light aberation?

  • Have Walson provide the date, time of day and location of the video. But until we know that, I very much doubt that it's a "spaceship". Looks more like clouds, or aurora borealis.

  • No offense, but you have zero clue what aurora borealis looks like. :)

  • That dude is a no brainer!!! Aurora Boreali? Come on, he/she must be retarded.

  • @Reephenbaker You're an IDIOT. Worse you think other's are as ignorant as you are!

  • @Reephenbaker Those move. This doesn't.

  • no it is clearly an object and not aurora

  • well it looks nothing like enterprise. but still nice 2 c something strange

  • If this way filmed in 07 OR 08 it could still be the shuttle breaking up through the atmosphere.That was how many years ago?

  • If this is the Shuttle breaking up upon re-entry, then that would be Feb 1st, 2003. Good video either way.

  • Comment removed

  • THAT,was the space shuttle Columbia,as it burned up during re-entry

  • Seeing as though this video was filmed last year I think you might be out by just a small tad.

  • That looks more like a Nebulon-B Frigate from Star Wars than anything even remotely close to ANY incarnation of the Enterprise. But yeah....... nice.

  • HOLY SHIT

  • i found no response for any of those search ques on the said website

  • retard

  • looks like a glory efect on a small cloud.

  • yes...we all know what the international space station looks like from earth.

  • errr... not like this?

  • uh....you're streching the imagination a bit far, aren't you?

  • yes, far out of the box. Thanks for watching.

  • grid .did williams or lucas ever contact you?

  • Very interesting what would that be.

  • Engines were way to far apart to be the Enterprise

  • ya nebulon b frigate

  • 0:18

    It actually looks more like the Nebulon-B Frigate from Star Wars.

  • Yes it does.

  • NO! it looks like a butterfly

  • lol

  • daedulus anyone?

  • I found that to be quite interesting, thanks.

  • So these people are beliving startrek class spaceships?  Not for me.

  • some half-assed cloaking technology

  • looks like that starwars ship in episode 5 lol

    but it does look like the constitution classes back bit (with out the saucer section)

  • Doesn't resemble any Star Trek ship, Enterprise or not, that I have seen, and I am a big Trek person.

  • Thats just a picture of Columbia breaking up. Not cool

  • No it isn't.  Don't be so ridiculous.

  • How does it look like Columbia, doesn't look like the shuttle or a clump of debris, looks formed......

    I don't know if I believe in UFOs, but I do know it would be awesome if someday we could build our own Enterprises or something like that and go exploring. All those planets and stars, there has to be something worth seeing...........

    It sorta does look like the old Enterprise, but who knows what it is or was, but again, it would be so great to build our own.......

  • While it is an interesting piece of footage, you don't get much substance to your claims when you post it on youtube. Thats half as bad as giving the footage to Fox News.

  • That's ridiculous. With fox i wouldn't have complete control over what i show.

  • I'm only saying that youtube is not the best platform to try and convince people something is real. Not many people go on youtube to see factual information, more for enjoyment.

  • if only we new the coordinates,excellent what ever it is your doing.

  • I bet its a Antillian Starship, they're all over the Earth, I see them in my dreams.

  • Looks more like a Nebulon-B Frigate IMO

  • no its a ferengi manawar

  • UFO nuts are hilarious. This is only the re-entry of a spent third stage from a Russian Soyuz vehicle. At least it's not the usual "UFO" footage from Shuttle missions, where it's ice near the orbiter's cameras. Like I said, UFO fools are really lacking any basic education.

  • Really? Funny how this craft has been filmed many times in the same location. Maybe you should see the latest video of it filmed in SEPTEMBER. Maybe we should get a re entry picture and compare it with this one.

  • I've looked through other videos of yours and they are all expended stages re-entering. Nothing UFOy about them, sorry - manmade stages re-entering. Also looks like you've been tampering with still images, shaking them around, in order to aid your frabrication. So no point comparing actual footage with this nonsense. You UFO nuts do realize that even though youtube is a haven for the foolish, some people actually know the reality of such footage?

  • Now you're talking absolute rubbish and spreading disinformation.

  • well you continue to be a fool. continue waiting for CNN to tell you the truth.

    and this is the "reality of such footage", you government dickheads think everyone is manipulated by your bullshit lies. well obviously not and you obviously took the time to watch this film, must be of some importance. And if youtube is a haven for the foolish and considering that you haven't uploaded a video for over a year, why do you continue to log on? you have proven who you are and what you represent.

  • lol its a dam skate bored noob

  • Maybe you should learn what the word noob means, lol.

  • These a fair questions.from executivesteps

    why no image rotation due to the typical alt-azimuth tracking of satellites.

    Why no rotation of the image due to changing perspective as it moves (see real images of the ISS on YT).

    Why no color variation anywhere.

    Why no surface rendering.

    Please, just record one of these 'things' and vary the focus slightly in and out while recording and watch your 'spaceship' morph into another optical mess.

    These images are baloney aren't they?

  • They are not satellites, they are positioned where on ewould normally see stars.

  • Bah if anything it looks the space craft from "Space 1999".

  • this video really sucks!!!!

  • too bad.

  • Nebulon B-Frigate

  • What you have here is a really bad optical 'stack'. I suspect the problem is in the lens barrel of the zoom assembly of the video cam or the worst optical polishing and figuring job ever.

    My guess is these are ridiculously high powered images, zoomed even larger with a video cam zoom of stars being tracked with an standard astronomical equatorial mounting.

    Notice the slight regular position corrections which are likely declination corrections due to misalignment on the pole.

  • Your guess appears to be way off the mark.

  • Tell us how it's done so we don't have to guess.

    Also, why no image rotation due to the typical alt-azimuth tracking of satellites.

    Why no rotation of the image due to changing perspective as it moves (see real images of the ISS on YT).

    Why no color variation anywhere.

    Why no surface rendering.

    Please, just record one of these 'things' and vary the focus slightly in and out while recording and watch your 'spaceship' morph into another optical mess.

    These images are baloney aren't they?

  • Lol, that sounded exactly like the technobabble deus ex machina explanations you get at the end of star trek episodes that magically makes everything right again.

  • So where to I go to see a recognizable image of the International Space Station on orbit taken by Mr. Walson? It's the biggest brightest thing in low Earth orbit and should be an easy target if for no other reason as a calibration or resolution check.

    Are there any?

  • The ISS has been shown in some of the older videos and is always labelled.

  • insightful comments, both--thanx for sharing them

  • I don't see it. It doesn't look like the Enterprise to me. : /

  • I suppose the title is more of a metaphor.

  • What are you on about?

  • It looks like a long blimp

  • Gene Roddenberry, high freemason, worked with NASA..consider also the futurist society..these ppl are given an inside track and told/shown what 'our' military have and are massively funded, as is Hollywood, by the military-industrial complex..as Alan Watt observes, scifi is predictive programming/it plants seeds so that when "new" [new to us] tech turns up it feels more natural..i'm convinced this is genuine footage

  • It's fun to pretend...

  • its just a lego figure in the window...

  • You're always forgetting one thing aren't you. I don't film them myself. Why are you lying about jeff when there's 14 articles on his site about this?

  • wow, only takes me 1 second to block you.

  • No he hasn't. You're lying.

  • Stop wasting my time.

  • It's the International Space Station being tracked by a telescope in someone's yard. The thing is big enough to be seen with the naked eye orbiting at night.

  • really? i never knew that.

  • It's not the ISS. There are many unidentified objects up there that we don't know much about at all. They could be anything.

  • Are you sue? Because he's right, it looks a lot like the Sun flaring off the ISS's giant solar arrays.

    If not that, then there are hundreds of other crafts and thousands of debris orbiting this planet. Whatever it is, it's being tracked by NORAD anyway.

  • yeah man, I could see SOMETHING up there last night, I'm sure it was a satellite. looked like a bright star that moved quickly.

    the weird thing is...im sure it was stationary for most of the night then only moved after a while.

    who knows.

  • beam me up, scotty! :)

  • This looks like a reflection of a keychain off glass.

  • It's not a sat but it IS a hoax. And a bad one at that.

  • Maybe you need some glasses.

  • Maybe you should give your imagination a break for a while....

  • that seriously just looked like he video taped a photograph of a box and made it shaky.

  • There are many videos in this series. Some even prove these are filmed in space. cheers.

  • This doesn't really look like anything.

  • Find this in goto and I'll give you everything i own. promise.

  • From what I could gather that didn't look alot like the ENT but more like a nacelle

  • Until you take tissue sample you have no evidence for the ET origins. Then the govt can hoax these tests also. Stop thinking about the joy rides an think NWO....

  • If it bleeds....we can kill it.

  • it looks like the ambasader class or ncc 1701-c

  • There be whales captain.

  • no fish in space from what i've seen.

  • That's not Enterprise... that is a spacestation!

  • All right, I buy it. But then, U.S. must have some other spacecenter, or could the NASA send ships over ships to the space without nobody noticing it ? As it must be assembled in space, you know. Welded together or something like a Lego thingy.

    You tell me. (signed: a Chilean).

  • Its most likely a star wars defense platform.

  • looks to me to be the space station.rere's

  • if you say this something looks like Enterprise from Star Trek, then you have never seen Enterprise... this is bullshit.

  • i agree. it looks more like Kahn's ship.

  • Yeah I don't get it. Robbie Williams? The singer?

  • maybe its a klingon cloaking device that has been invaded by a home vid camera, hahaha

  • well they DO have cloaking devices, as the phrase was coined so many decades ago ... the military isnt shy on sharing that fact

  • Yeah lets go to neverland second star to the right and straight on till morning hee lol

  • Whats with the challenge to robbie williams and spielberg??? Did I miss something??

  • validation.

  • no enterprise, but no doubt it is man made

  • wow! thats pretty cool.

  • That was the Space Shuttle Columbia as it broke up and burned during re-entry. All seven astronauts were killed.

  • filmed in 2007? thats what it says in description

  • it looks like the nebula b medical frigate off star wars return of the jedi! lol

  • I saw this on a Bob Sponge episode.

  • I recognize it, it's a french submarine disappeared in the 60s

  • Don't know what the context of this footage is, but the audio definitely does not belong with it. IMO this is a recording of a window reflection in a passenger jet...

  • ds of these videos showing different objects. There's even a recent one showing the TELESCOPE working live.

  • That doesn't look like Enterprise at all.

  • THAT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE SHIT!