Makes you laugh when people jump at the chance of making stupid remarks without really thinking or question anything no wonder half the human race is DOOMED.
@thirteeeeeeen I've shown mor evideos of these in space and proven they are being filmed from a scope. Just because your brain can't compute it doesn't mean it should be removed as many others are unable to compute it also.
GRIDKEEPER's videos are perhaps the single most impressive collection of original ufo footage showing such a diverse menagerie of seldom-seen ephemerites; multidimensional alien behemoths cruising on high, barely visible just beyond the grasp of Earths pull.
Interwoven within layers of pitch black space, juxtaposed within the innocuous glimmers of a star-spattered night sky, they watch from afar, perceptible only by their enormity like nomadic chameleons
A great lot of people, unfortunately, are full of crap. Also, many are in beligerant denial, and will not believe the truth, at any cost. Here is a quote:
"If you are going to tell people the truth, you had better make them laugh, or else they'll kill you." --George Bernard Shaw
@CrazyBear65 MKULtra made him go all crazy. I could have carried on filming the moon but don't have the money for a scope. Have told dozens of people how to do it on the net and not one person has ever got back to me to say they've had a go using the same method. He never showed me how to fim the ships but i did look at them live through the scope which is why I show the films.
Some guy made a telescope and camcorder that was powerful enough to capture these object on the out skirts of space he has his own channel with loads of these objects he says there interstella craft.
The "secret space program" is no secret. NASA was always a propaganda spin-off of the military's real space program. The military has it's own satellites some of which are public knowledge. But most of what the military/industrial complex engages in goes far beyond any NASA project. More importanly, these technologies are private, not public property. Like Area 51, they belong to a consortium of private military contractors which is why they are never part of the public record.
REAL Free energy technology exists!But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the energy revolution!
@spymak7 So the startrek enterprise is an alien craft is it? Listen to yourself, many of these craft were built by the NSA wheras many have never been identified leaving many unanswered questions.
MOONRAKER! watch moonraker and go to the part where they are heading to the moon and find a secret space station that is totally unknown to people on earth.
this must be the "nonterrestrial officers" space station Gary was talking about!!!...but why? to fight off aliens so we cant have contact and become free from dependencies,and have access to a true knowledge base?! everything seems to be designed around one thing...to control us.
"Reephenbaker" , are you legally blind? You must be because I live way, way up north and I can assure you that this solid object is no "Aurora Borealis". This huge structure has been filmed time and time again by other "Telescope Videographers" from around the world. You really don't have any idea what you are talking about.
Have Walson provide the date, time of day and location of the video. But until we know that, I very much doubt that it's a "spaceship". Looks more like clouds, or aurora borealis.
How does it look like Columbia, doesn't look like the shuttle or a clump of debris, looks formed......
I don't know if I believe in UFOs, but I do know it would be awesome if someday we could build our own Enterprises or something like that and go exploring. All those planets and stars, there has to be something worth seeing...........
It sorta does look like the old Enterprise, but who knows what it is or was, but again, it would be so great to build our own.......
While it is an interesting piece of footage, you don't get much substance to your claims when you post it on youtube. Thats half as bad as giving the footage to Fox News.
I'm only saying that youtube is not the best platform to try and convince people something is real. Not many people go on youtube to see factual information, more for enjoyment.
UFO nuts are hilarious. This is only the re-entry of a spent third stage from a Russian Soyuz vehicle. At least it's not the usual "UFO" footage from Shuttle missions, where it's ice near the orbiter's cameras. Like I said, UFO fools are really lacking any basic education.
Really? Funny how this craft has been filmed many times in the same location. Maybe you should see the latest video of it filmed in SEPTEMBER. Maybe we should get a re entry picture and compare it with this one.
I've looked through other videos of yours and they are all expended stages re-entering. Nothing UFOy about them, sorry - manmade stages re-entering. Also looks like you've been tampering with still images, shaking them around, in order to aid your frabrication. So no point comparing actual footage with this nonsense. You UFO nuts do realize that even though youtube is a haven for the foolish, some people actually know the reality of such footage?
well you continue to be a fool. continue waiting for CNN to tell you the truth.
and this is the "reality of such footage", you government dickheads think everyone is manipulated by your bullshit lies. well obviously not and you obviously took the time to watch this film, must be of some importance. And if youtube is a haven for the foolish and considering that you haven't uploaded a video for over a year, why do you continue to log on? you have proven who you are and what you represent.
why no image rotation due to the typical alt-azimuth tracking of satellites.
Why no rotation of the image due to changing perspective as it moves (see real images of the ISS on YT).
Why no color variation anywhere.
Why no surface rendering.
Please, just record one of these 'things' and vary the focus slightly in and out while recording and watch your 'spaceship' morph into another optical mess.
What you have here is a really bad optical 'stack'. I suspect the problem is in the lens barrel of the zoom assembly of the video cam or the worst optical polishing and figuring job ever.
My guess is these are ridiculously high powered images, zoomed even larger with a video cam zoom of stars being tracked with an standard astronomical equatorial mounting.
Notice the slight regular position corrections which are likely declination corrections due to misalignment on the pole.
Also, why no image rotation due to the typical alt-azimuth tracking of satellites.
Why no rotation of the image due to changing perspective as it moves (see real images of the ISS on YT).
Why no color variation anywhere.
Why no surface rendering.
Please, just record one of these 'things' and vary the focus slightly in and out while recording and watch your 'spaceship' morph into another optical mess.
Lol, that sounded exactly like the technobabble deus ex machina explanations you get at the end of star trek episodes that magically makes everything right again.
So where to I go to see a recognizable image of the International Space Station on orbit taken by Mr. Walson? It's the biggest brightest thing in low Earth orbit and should be an easy target if for no other reason as a calibration or resolution check.
Gene Roddenberry, high freemason, worked with NASA..consider also the futurist society..these ppl are given an inside track and told/shown what 'our' military have and are massively funded, as is Hollywood, by the military-industrial complex..as Alan Watt observes, scifi is predictive programming/it plants seeds so that when "new" [new to us] tech turns up it feels more natural..i'm convinced this is genuine footage
You're always forgetting one thing aren't you. I don't film them myself. Why are you lying about jeff when there's 14 articles on his site about this?
It's the International Space Station being tracked by a telescope in someone's yard. The thing is big enough to be seen with the naked eye orbiting at night.
Until you take tissue sample you have no evidence for the ET origins. Then the govt can hoax these tests also. Stop thinking about the joy rides an think NWO....
All right, I buy it. But then, U.S. must have some other spacecenter, or could the NASA send ships over ships to the space without nobody noticing it ? As it must be assembled in space, you know. Welded together or something like a Lego thingy.
Don't know what the context of this footage is, but the audio definitely does not belong with it. IMO this is a recording of a window reflection in a passenger jet...
Makes you laugh when people jump at the chance of making stupid remarks without really thinking or question anything no wonder half the human race is DOOMED.
TheComingEvents2012 1 month ago
i know this ship too
RoteHex666 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Can see this shit in telescope&
Anaheim569 3 months ago
I'm a believer, but too short, too snowy, and too fake.
GUACARICA 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do you think these can be captured using the afocal method instead of prime, GK?
DABOXASH 4 months ago
Comment removed
DABOXASH 4 months ago
lenard photos all faked ...
daendiscoming 4 months ago
@daendiscoming what makes you say that?
DABOXASH 4 months ago
Klingon Battlecruiser of course.
GSDubz 5 months ago
Look at it people! It's a freakin' helicopter!
creepsgirl 6 months ago
@creepsgirl Are you serious? If so which helicopter do you think it is?
GRIDKEEPER 6 months ago
@GRIDKEEPER It's a Chinook, moron.
Evilmike42 3 months ago
@Evilmike42 That's hilarious. didn't know that Chinooks could fly through space.
GRIDKEEPER 3 months ago
@creepsgirl That's no helicopter, moron.
ZeskoWhirligan 3 months ago
FUCKING SHEEPS!!
TheFF00XX100 6 months ago
haha that is casually a whale in the sea being filmed from a plane
griffy87 6 months ago
one small step for armstrong one GIANT LIE for Earth
kuvceebxab1 7 months ago
youtube needs to delete videos if they have shitloads of dislikes like this one
thirteeeeeeen 7 months ago
@thirteeeeeeen I've shown mor evideos of these in space and proven they are being filmed from a scope. Just because your brain can't compute it doesn't mean it should be removed as many others are unable to compute it also.
GRIDKEEPER 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Always enraptured and perpetually in awe.
GRIDKEEPER's videos are perhaps the single most impressive collection of original ufo footage showing such a diverse menagerie of seldom-seen ephemerites; multidimensional alien behemoths cruising on high, barely visible just beyond the grasp of Earths pull.
Interwoven within layers of pitch black space, juxtaposed within the innocuous glimmers of a star-spattered night sky, they watch from afar, perceptible only by their enormity like nomadic chameleons
junkification 8 months ago
A great lot of people, unfortunately, are full of crap. Also, many are in beligerant denial, and will not believe the truth, at any cost. Here is a quote:
"If you are going to tell people the truth, you had better make them laugh, or else they'll kill you." --George Bernard Shaw
Now... What happened to John?
CrazyBear65 9 months ago 3
@CrazyBear65 MKULtra made him go all crazy. I could have carried on filming the moon but don't have the money for a scope. Have told dozens of people how to do it on the net and not one person has ever got back to me to say they've had a go using the same method. He never showed me how to fim the ships but i did look at them live through the scope which is why I show the films.
GRIDKEEPER 9 months ago
@lifepod2036
He mirrored the video of the breakdown of Colombia.
Snowwie88 10 months ago
@Snowwie88 That's a ridiculous accusation.
GRIDKEEPER 10 months ago
Star SHIP Enterprise. Star Trek is the name of the show.
translucentorb 11 months ago
Some guy made a telescope and camcorder that was powerful enough to capture these object on the out skirts of space he has his own channel with loads of these objects he says there interstella craft.
mistermoody2012 11 months ago
This looks nothing like the Enterprise. Or anything for that matter. Could be a bug squashed against a window for all I know.
lonstar70 1 year ago 2
Sorry but you lost me at Robbies big gurning face.
McHanraohanrahan 1 year ago
looks more like the reliant with its warp nacels pointing down
johydee1 1 year ago
What the fuck is with robbie at the end, trying to tell us something lol
DreamsCatcher101 1 year ago
I don't get which bit is supposed to look like the Enterprise.
Wimpoman 1 year ago
@lifepod2036 That's moronic!
randallcaster 1 year ago
The "secret space program" is no secret. NASA was always a propaganda spin-off of the military's real space program. The military has it's own satellites some of which are public knowledge. But most of what the military/industrial complex engages in goes far beyond any NASA project. More importanly, these technologies are private, not public property. Like Area 51, they belong to a consortium of private military contractors which is why they are never part of the public record.
bondurango 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REAL Free energy technology exists!But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the energy revolution!
violafinishda 1 year ago
ignore gaykeeper's vids and remarks, just another dumb kid who believes anything above the ground is an alien ship
spymak7 1 year ago 2
@spymak7 So the startrek enterprise is an alien craft is it? Listen to yourself, many of these craft were built by the NSA wheras many have never been identified leaving many unanswered questions.
GRIDKEEPER 1 year ago
@spymak7
Keep ridiculing that which you small mind can't comprehend; it'll get you where you need to be, which is nowhere.
randallcaster 1 year ago
@randallcaster
Wow, you almost constructed a full sentence there, and all by yourself.
Well. Good for you, kid.
Keep being a sheople.
spymak7 1 year ago
YEA, IME VERY CONFUSED TOO, ITS JUST A SPACE SHUTTLE OR A JET PLANE, THAT HAS BEEN EDITED TO LOOK TRANSLUCENT..
GabrielS14 1 year ago
Kirk to Enterprise...BEAM.ME.UP!
thrillhausen 1 year ago
It doesnt look like the Enterprise. It looks Cardassian to me.
gtrefghuk 1 year ago
MOONRAKER! watch moonraker and go to the part where they are heading to the moon and find a secret space station that is totally unknown to people on earth.
this must be the "nonterrestrial officers" space station Gary was talking about!!!...but why? to fight off aliens so we cant have contact and become free from dependencies,and have access to a true knowledge base?! everything seems to be designed around one thing...to control us.
NWM11Bravo 1 year ago
@lifepod2036 That's ok but you're seriously mistaken. It was filmed in 2008 and there are other videos on my account showing it on other days.
GRIDKEEPER 1 year ago
@lifepod2036 Please don't be so ridiculous.
GRIDKEEPER 1 year ago
whoaaa!!! watching this while listening imperial march is just awesome!!!
riksuv 1 year ago
looks like an oil rig
p666ayr 2 years ago
R: man will space walk
rzsigray1 2 years ago
I wish I knew.
GRIDKEEPER 2 years ago
i love star trek...
LAW0MEN 2 years ago
i don't think this is ufo. Nikola Tesla, beam weapon concept?
LAW0MEN 2 years ago
"Reephenbaker" , are you legally blind? You must be because I live way, way up north and I can assure you that this solid object is no "Aurora Borealis". This huge structure has been filmed time and time again by other "Telescope Videographers" from around the world. You really don't have any idea what you are talking about.
Tiberiusduck 2 years ago
looks more lke the Columbia when she broke up on re-entry.. to me
jedivid 2 years ago
It's one object. Wren't there smoke trails coming off the shuttle when it broke up. Also this was filmed in 2008.
GRIDKEEPER 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
star trek sux
TheOfc100 2 years ago
I dont think the objects are solid, just some kind of light aberation?
razorbillone 2 years ago
Have Walson provide the date, time of day and location of the video. But until we know that, I very much doubt that it's a "spaceship". Looks more like clouds, or aurora borealis.
Damndrrtyapes 2 years ago
No offense, but you have zero clue what aurora borealis looks like. :)
Reephenbaker 2 years ago 6
That dude is a no brainer!!! Aurora Boreali? Come on, he/she must be retarded.
MixingLaboratory 2 years ago
@Reephenbaker You're an IDIOT. Worse you think other's are as ignorant as you are!
randallcaster 1 year ago
@Reephenbaker Those move. This doesn't.
Idazmi7 4 months ago
no it is clearly an object and not aurora
SHAOLINSINZ 2 years ago
well it looks nothing like enterprise. but still nice 2 c something strange
joey007007 2 years ago
If this way filmed in 07 OR 08 it could still be the shuttle breaking up through the atmosphere.That was how many years ago?
imacgoo 2 years ago
If this is the Shuttle breaking up upon re-entry, then that would be Feb 1st, 2003. Good video either way.
AudiotechRecords 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I believe this, because I'm from a greater position of power and I know the truth. Thats all im going to say to all you viewers.
fddiono 2 years ago
Comment removed
fddiono 2 years ago
THAT,was the space shuttle Columbia,as it burned up during re-entry
imacgoo 2 years ago
Seeing as though this video was filmed last year I think you might be out by just a small tad.
GRIDKEEPER 2 years ago
That looks more like a Nebulon-B Frigate from Star Wars than anything even remotely close to ANY incarnation of the Enterprise. But yeah....... nice.
Tunabash 2 years ago
HOLY SHIT
gonzo5507 3 years ago
i found no response for any of those search ques on the said website
WellSightedGentleman 3 years ago
retard
Urchinking 3 years ago
looks like a glory efect on a small cloud.
hellavadeal 3 years ago
yes...we all know what the international space station looks like from earth.
Criticmizer 3 years ago 2
errr... not like this?
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
uh....you're streching the imagination a bit far, aren't you?
grs9769 3 years ago
yes, far out of the box. Thanks for watching.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
grid .did williams or lucas ever contact you?
sirnicholson 3 years ago
Very interesting what would that be.
ParaglidingManiac 3 years ago
Engines were way to far apart to be the Enterprise
cooluke 3 years ago
ya nebulon b frigate
awishtofall 3 years ago
0:18
It actually looks more like the Nebulon-B Frigate from Star Wars.
455Dan554 3 years ago
Yes it does.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
NO! it looks like a butterfly
adam3176 3 years ago
lol
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
daedulus anyone?
patsampo 3 years ago
I found that to be quite interesting, thanks.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
So these people are beliving startrek class spaceships? Not for me.
moello88 3 years ago
some half-assed cloaking technology
veltpak6 3 years ago
looks like that starwars ship in episode 5 lol
but it does look like the constitution classes back bit (with out the saucer section)
chaoz44 3 years ago
Doesn't resemble any Star Trek ship, Enterprise or not, that I have seen, and I am a big Trek person.
Airportchris2 3 years ago
Thats just a picture of Columbia breaking up. Not cool
raidenzero 3 years ago
No it isn't. Don't be so ridiculous.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
How does it look like Columbia, doesn't look like the shuttle or a clump of debris, looks formed......
I don't know if I believe in UFOs, but I do know it would be awesome if someday we could build our own Enterprises or something like that and go exploring. All those planets and stars, there has to be something worth seeing...........
It sorta does look like the old Enterprise, but who knows what it is or was, but again, it would be so great to build our own.......
obiwanobiwan13 3 years ago
While it is an interesting piece of footage, you don't get much substance to your claims when you post it on youtube. Thats half as bad as giving the footage to Fox News.
lastminuteregret 3 years ago
That's ridiculous. With fox i wouldn't have complete control over what i show.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
I'm only saying that youtube is not the best platform to try and convince people something is real. Not many people go on youtube to see factual information, more for enjoyment.
lastminuteregret 3 years ago
if only we new the coordinates,excellent what ever it is your doing.
DIMPLEKEY 3 years ago
I bet its a Antillian Starship, they're all over the Earth, I see them in my dreams.
C0LL1N 3 years ago
Looks more like a Nebulon-B Frigate IMO
Bojangles357 3 years ago
no its a ferengi manawar
muckstar23 3 years ago
UFO nuts are hilarious. This is only the re-entry of a spent third stage from a Russian Soyuz vehicle. At least it's not the usual "UFO" footage from Shuttle missions, where it's ice near the orbiter's cameras. Like I said, UFO fools are really lacking any basic education.
Tim733733 3 years ago
Really? Funny how this craft has been filmed many times in the same location. Maybe you should see the latest video of it filmed in SEPTEMBER. Maybe we should get a re entry picture and compare it with this one.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
I've looked through other videos of yours and they are all expended stages re-entering. Nothing UFOy about them, sorry - manmade stages re-entering. Also looks like you've been tampering with still images, shaking them around, in order to aid your frabrication. So no point comparing actual footage with this nonsense. You UFO nuts do realize that even though youtube is a haven for the foolish, some people actually know the reality of such footage?
Tim733733 3 years ago 2
Now you're talking absolute rubbish and spreading disinformation.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
well you continue to be a fool. continue waiting for CNN to tell you the truth.
and this is the "reality of such footage", you government dickheads think everyone is manipulated by your bullshit lies. well obviously not and you obviously took the time to watch this film, must be of some importance. And if youtube is a haven for the foolish and considering that you haven't uploaded a video for over a year, why do you continue to log on? you have proven who you are and what you represent.
SuaveCapone 3 years ago
lol its a dam skate bored noob
stoneredeye 3 years ago
Maybe you should learn what the word noob means, lol.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
These a fair questions.from executivesteps
why no image rotation due to the typical alt-azimuth tracking of satellites.
Why no rotation of the image due to changing perspective as it moves (see real images of the ISS on YT).
Why no color variation anywhere.
Why no surface rendering.
Please, just record one of these 'things' and vary the focus slightly in and out while recording and watch your 'spaceship' morph into another optical mess.
These images are baloney aren't they?
andweallfelldown 3 years ago
They are not satellites, they are positioned where on ewould normally see stars.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
Bah if anything it looks the space craft from "Space 1999".
Ninefingers1010 3 years ago
this video really sucks!!!!
tejanoparasiempre 3 years ago
too bad.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
Nebulon B-Frigate
TheBlitz1 3 years ago
What you have here is a really bad optical 'stack'. I suspect the problem is in the lens barrel of the zoom assembly of the video cam or the worst optical polishing and figuring job ever.
My guess is these are ridiculously high powered images, zoomed even larger with a video cam zoom of stars being tracked with an standard astronomical equatorial mounting.
Notice the slight regular position corrections which are likely declination corrections due to misalignment on the pole.
executivesteps 3 years ago
Your guess appears to be way off the mark.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
Tell us how it's done so we don't have to guess.
Also, why no image rotation due to the typical alt-azimuth tracking of satellites.
Why no rotation of the image due to changing perspective as it moves (see real images of the ISS on YT).
Why no color variation anywhere.
Why no surface rendering.
Please, just record one of these 'things' and vary the focus slightly in and out while recording and watch your 'spaceship' morph into another optical mess.
These images are baloney aren't they?
executivesteps 3 years ago
Lol, that sounded exactly like the technobabble deus ex machina explanations you get at the end of star trek episodes that magically makes everything right again.
camydoger 3 years ago
So where to I go to see a recognizable image of the International Space Station on orbit taken by Mr. Walson? It's the biggest brightest thing in low Earth orbit and should be an easy target if for no other reason as a calibration or resolution check.
Are there any?
executivesteps 3 years ago
The ISS has been shown in some of the older videos and is always labelled.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
insightful comments, both--thanx for sharing them
EmmaCharlotteStubbs 3 years ago
I don't see it. It doesn't look like the Enterprise to me. : /
enRAGEd91 3 years ago
I suppose the title is more of a metaphor.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
What are you on about?
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
It looks like a long blimp
Hellow54321 3 years ago
Gene Roddenberry, high freemason, worked with NASA..consider also the futurist society..these ppl are given an inside track and told/shown what 'our' military have and are massively funded, as is Hollywood, by the military-industrial complex..as Alan Watt observes, scifi is predictive programming/it plants seeds so that when "new" [new to us] tech turns up it feels more natural..i'm convinced this is genuine footage
EmmaCharlotteStubbs 3 years ago 2
It's fun to pretend...
jastat 3 years ago
its just a lego figure in the window...
szergejcucu 3 years ago
You're always forgetting one thing aren't you. I don't film them myself. Why are you lying about jeff when there's 14 articles on his site about this?
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
wow, only takes me 1 second to block you.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
No he hasn't. You're lying.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
Stop wasting my time.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
It's the International Space Station being tracked by a telescope in someone's yard. The thing is big enough to be seen with the naked eye orbiting at night.
cdydatzigs 3 years ago
really? i never knew that.
joebobers 3 years ago
It's not the ISS. There are many unidentified objects up there that we don't know much about at all. They could be anything.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
Are you sue? Because he's right, it looks a lot like the Sun flaring off the ISS's giant solar arrays.
If not that, then there are hundreds of other crafts and thousands of debris orbiting this planet. Whatever it is, it's being tracked by NORAD anyway.
samgod 3 years ago
yeah man, I could see SOMETHING up there last night, I'm sure it was a satellite. looked like a bright star that moved quickly.
the weird thing is...im sure it was stationary for most of the night then only moved after a while.
who knows.
noisecape 3 years ago
beam me up, scotty! :)
reachingskies 3 years ago
This looks like a reflection of a keychain off glass.
koriko88 3 years ago
It's not a sat but it IS a hoax. And a bad one at that.
Tommyr 3 years ago
Maybe you need some glasses.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
Maybe you should give your imagination a break for a while....
Tommyr 3 years ago
that seriously just looked like he video taped a photograph of a box and made it shaky.
CrippledPidgeon 3 years ago
There are many videos in this series. Some even prove these are filmed in space. cheers.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
This doesn't really look like anything.
thisismedgr 3 years ago
Find this in goto and I'll give you everything i own. promise.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
From what I could gather that didn't look alot like the ENT but more like a nacelle
forceflo94 3 years ago
Until you take tissue sample you have no evidence for the ET origins. Then the govt can hoax these tests also. Stop thinking about the joy rides an think NWO....
freecounselingonline 3 years ago
If it bleeds....we can kill it.
billyboyjennings 3 years ago
it looks like the ambasader class or ncc 1701-c
anoldchick 3 years ago
There be whales captain.
nookiboi 3 years ago
no fish in space from what i've seen.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
That's not Enterprise... that is a spacestation!
Spathever 3 years ago
All right, I buy it. But then, U.S. must have some other spacecenter, or could the NASA send ships over ships to the space without nobody noticing it ? As it must be assembled in space, you know. Welded together or something like a Lego thingy.
You tell me. (signed: a Chilean).
heliosium 3 years ago
Its most likely a star wars defense platform.
spiralreplicator 3 years ago
looks to me to be the space station.rere's
smr1967 3 years ago
if you say this something looks like Enterprise from Star Trek, then you have never seen Enterprise... this is bullshit.
oriontrail 3 years ago 5
i agree. it looks more like Kahn's ship.
captainofvoyager 3 years ago
Yeah I don't get it. Robbie Williams? The singer?
Scionic 3 years ago
maybe its a klingon cloaking device that has been invaded by a home vid camera, hahaha
bxlxix69 3 years ago
well they DO have cloaking devices, as the phrase was coined so many decades ago ... the military isnt shy on sharing that fact
humanedomain 3 years ago
Yeah lets go to neverland second star to the right and straight on till morning hee lol
serenayami6 3 years ago
Whats with the challenge to robbie williams and spielberg??? Did I miss something??
EddieTheHead71 3 years ago
validation.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
no enterprise, but no doubt it is man made
punjow 3 years ago
wow! thats pretty cool.
CatTubeVids 3 years ago
That was the Space Shuttle Columbia as it broke up and burned during re-entry. All seven astronauts were killed.
Leopardmadcat 3 years ago 2
filmed in 2007? thats what it says in description
CatTubeVids 3 years ago
it looks like the nebula b medical frigate off star wars return of the jedi! lol
LeighAndrew 3 years ago
I saw this on a Bob Sponge episode.
Rogerah 3 years ago
I recognize it, it's a french submarine disappeared in the 60s
laminarwing 3 years ago
Don't know what the context of this footage is, but the audio definitely does not belong with it. IMO this is a recording of a window reflection in a passenger jet...
klatuveradanikto 3 years ago
ds of these videos showing different objects. There's even a recent one showing the TELESCOPE working live.
GRIDKEEPER 3 years ago
That doesn't look like Enterprise at all.
FMAfan241 3 years ago
THAT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE SHIT!
Titanium0X 3 years ago