this final statement of Sir Dawkins made me cry. Epiphany. You know when you come to a point in your life where you realize that you did not ask a any man in the sky to create you and yet you are created and you have to make the most out of your life while you still live. It is striving to be more of who you are presently and I really like the fact that there is no afterlife in the sense that I can live a more fulfilling life because I live my life to the fullest.
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
my video respond includes this video, with greek subtitles. It's a tribute to Hitchens, inclunding words by ordinary ppl that never heard Dawkins or Hitchens, their words are similar though. It's a trailer, by following link on description, you are led to the main video
@Territomauvais I'm sure you have read the Bible, on the surface, but not in its historical and chronological and hermeneutical context.
Do a google search for "David Cameron criticised by Richard Dawkins" by Simon Peter Sutherland (Thats me) and you can read what I have written about him. His whole understanding of the Law of Moses for today is an error. Also search for "Richard Dawkins is wrong: Martin Luther was not against “Reason” or “Logical correctness”.
no afterlife - only matter and energy, forever moving into new forms. That's the universe. That's us. We are a part of the universe that became conscious for a while, and maybe it will again, somewhere, sometime. I understand the secret of the universe now. The "meaning" of life. All religions become laugable and meaningless when you understand this. So never try to convince me again. You have lost, you have chosen the loosing team if you believe religion. It's a crashing plane. Happy landing.
@GrantRants my level is far high from you mister ignorance plus arrogance prouve that god dosn't exist can you ! prouve that you exist you don't since you realy to hat exist and there is one thing which exist which is god you wont exist till in your case exist in hell for the eternity you may win with a christian because christians beleive in lies but you will never win with a muslim you ignorant
@GrantRants you don't worth a second of my time idiot beleive orr don't beleive, that's your business i have nothing to gain and nothing to lose if you think that i'm trying to convert somebody you are mistaken i can prove that god exists but i won't unless you want to pay me :) that's my logic i see a burn soul here hahaha joking empty your mind be neutral don't defend something because you love it read quran read the life of prophet mohammed judge for yourself life is a test don't fail in it
@h0ucine1 Seems I was worth the couple minutes it took to write your unintelligible "retorts".
As for that last part? Read it. Didn't care much for it. Was just about as loony as the Bible... A little less human sacrifice, a little more pedophile marriage. Frankly, if I want to believe in magic, I'd believe in Harry Potter instead. At least I get a pet owl in that one.
Richard Dawkins is such a perfect spokesperson for the Atheist community. He can truly see all the beauty in life without needing to put a god in front of it, and he is a magnificent poet, the way he writes all of his speeches. This video just reminded me how lucky I am to be alive.
laws of science easily disprove a grand old man with a beard to control and build a universe so vast would take the same amount of energy to form . why would a vast immense entity give two shits for a personal connection to a pale blue dot something that to it is equal too an electron
Atheists maintain that intelligence arises out of meaningless, random chaos; and is continually evolving via meaningless, random chaos.
The secular Greeks concluded via rational thought and critical observation that in the beginning there was Nous/Logos (Intelligence and Language i.e. the MIND of GOD and Symbolic Information). This great observation, made thousands of years ago, has been proven true by DNA.
@Mr88playmaker Incorrect. There is nothing chaotic about natural selection, and it is about as random as rolling a 200-sided die 1000000000 times and hoping for a 200 at least once..
@Mr88playmaker False. When you get into the scope of millions of years, "information"(which is not an appropriate word) is created through purely natural means in some cases. DNA is "information" in the same way the shape of a mountain is "information." It is not actual data, though data can be taken from it.
"We have the privilege of experiencing this world. A privilege not granted to many potential lives. Why should we complain that we're going to die? We should live life to the fullest."
@TheExtremistModerate why wouldn't richard dawkins showed up at bill craig's debate ...in the words of @TheExtremistModerate dawkins is a fucking coward...your words mate..
@hotshotsunnyz I was parodying @Richardstupid1's "logic." Scroll down a bit. He said (paraphrasing) "Because he refused to "debate" William Craig, he's a coward."
I was turning his logic on himself.
Richard Dawkins has more important things to do, and has declined debate offers from people far more prestigious positions. He is not a coward, WLC is an idiot for trying to say that when he got rejected. It's rather childish.
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
@shubhamkilla2 I disliked it, but only for the "how dare we whine" part. The fact I'm alive despite the vast improbability of my existence is amazing and all but that doesn't make it suck any less that it's going to end some day... if anything it makes it worth defending and preserving as long as possible that much more.
@WhiteDragon103 how dare we whine when we are ridiculously lucky to be here. We get the chance that billions do not. Appreciate life and be thankful is the message.
This guy Dawkins shouldn't be allowed on TV or the internet because he speaks the truth and brainwashed religious people get their feelings hurt. I'm calling my teddy bear Dawkins as a protest.
I certainly don't fear death. Why should I? It is pain most people fear, not death. I fully accept I wasn't around for billions of years before I was born, so why should I worry about death and not being around any more?
@TheodorePike I don't fear death in those respect either, but I do not want to die and this great wish for life, keeps me in some sort of fear of a premature death. I wish to accomplish more in this life. I believe in no afterlife.
Yes, take me out quickly if death is coming, please. Dr, Kevorkian to my side if needed.
Indeed. I have never quite understood why anybody would consider the idea of an afterlife a good thing anyway. If it turned out there was "something else" then all that means is that this life, and everything in it, was a complete and utter waste of time and of course, fake.
@TheodorePike I can understand why people invented the idea of an afterlife. All animals strive to stay alive. We all have instincts to stay alive. We run from predators.
Our imagination surely drove the idea of how we could escape the predator in some ultimate manner.
Anyone grounded in reality should know, this imaginary idea does not allow us to escape the predators that cause death. Permanent death.
Immanuel Kant had a different idea for why we have an afterlife. So the idea that we only have this idea because of some uber-self-preservation concept is wrong.
Why am I not surprised that a YouTube atheist calls a genius like Kant irrational? You people have no limits of lowness.
Kant argued on the basis of a need for justice to be satisfied. It is contrary to reason, wrote Kant, that when we follow objective morality that we should not receive due compensation. The evil receive good, the good receive evil. But this cannot continue forever. Since justice is not satisfied in this life, there must be a next one in which it will...
@AgApE010 If this is the last word of what Kant said of the idea, then he is wishful thinking. Kant is not a god, and thus cannot know all. There is not perfect justice. To expect such is just a product of religious indoctrination. Has there ever been philosopher who was correct on all things?
Kant was not indoctrinated. He was quite the freethinker. Although himself a theist, he questioned and critiqued many of the traditional arguments for God's existence. So this is not someone desperately trying to "prove God."
You must understand Kant's conclusions on the basis of his idea of objective ethics, which he derived through reason alone (i.e., his "categorical imperative"). If reason gives us ethics, reason necessitates that ethic's demands be satisfied.
@AgApE010 And I am supposed to believe you know if Kant was indoctrinated or not? Most religious would never admit to any indoctrination, yet 80% of all peoples follow the religion of their parents. Indoctrination. Just because Kant may not follow specific religion, does not mean the society he learned from was not so god fearing, that he was impervious to its indoctrination. Justice comes in many forms. Sometimes just a loss of real friends. Live in all forms of nature has no exact justice.
@AgApE010 Keep in mind, Kant was dead before the theory of evolution, much less the wonderful findings that the theory explains of our mind. Ones burdened guilt is justice.
@freethinkerer So man does not have a soul then or a spirit? If not how do you account for consciousness? Or spiritual connection between human beings?
Are you going to deny spiritual connection between souls? If so; Are you human? Do you have red blood in you?
@Zwemer100 No, I and most scientists do not believe in a soul or spirits. Our conscience is explained by our large brain and its large capacity to formulate, thus, it enables imagination. The apes that evolved this capacity were enabled to survive climate change by using innovation instead of brute strength. There is no great mystery of souls, now that science has come so far. That god gap has closed.
@freethinkerer I never mentioned conscience, but consciousness, thats not the same thing.
Well, like you say, "I and most scientists do not believe in a soul or spirits" well, you say it all, thats your belief and it is based upon their opinions.
Fact you say? No, thats your and their opinions also.
@DerrenBrown100 Computers, screens, scanners, ideas and scientific opinion, nothing more. Theists have been talking about how science cannot answer "who I am" for a long time and now they attempt to programme us with this. Which is nothing more than a denial of religious philosophy, based upon scientific philosophy.
Well, guess what? I deny this scientific philosophy, which does not work outside of its own reasoning.
@Zwemer100 Science came from philosophy. It is a system of knowledge attained through experimentation and observation that guides us through the world and see it as it really, truly is, and not as we wish it to be. It is the greatest idea that philosophy gave us. There are no boundaries that keep this kind of reason at bay, only other than that of religious stupidity, a rejection of what one wishes not to hear., which grants us not only little benefit, but hardships more than anything
@DerrenBrown100 Also, one issue the programme rather glossed over was regarding the results of experiments which have to be interpreted. The results are interpreted according to a scientific method or philosophy, which outside of itself, does not work. Thus, it is the interpretation of the facts that are so often faulty, not the facts themselves.
@Zwemer100 Same answer for consciousness, as that is what I was thinking of anyway.
I disbelieve in gods for hundreds,if not thousands of reasons. Science being on my side is just a bonus and can back up many of my reasons with actual evidence.
Care to show what I claimed as fact and not opinion?
Your religious beliefs are all of opinion, and none have any evidence to show it is at all factual. Most are of the following of opinion of ancient, unscientific, superstitious, barbaric, men.
@freethinkerer Your words display either bigotry or ignorance, little to do with freethinking.
You say, "none have any evidence to show it is at all factual". That is pathetic.
You worship science and a system of thought and fact. What science? Orthodox science of Unorthodox science?
Outside of your Orthodox mainstream scientific systems, your so-called facts are not facts at all, just ideas, theories and speculation. Nothing more.
@freethinkerer - It's the number one instinct, "stay alive". In fact it's so ground in us that we have very little control over it. Oddly we do when we feel others depend on us, which i find fascinating but also sad by it as religion hijack thats vulnerability in a way that you couldn't do using plain logic and reason alone.
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system to suit their Evo-Hoax agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
People who idolise dawkins are pathetic. He has completely abandoned his productive career as a scientist to talk about religion. 1. nobody cares and you are wasting all our and your time 2. its pointless as you can neither disprove or prove religion. Embarrassment to science and only interested in the money and fame I expect.
@qwert4327able A creator of the Universe cannot be disproved. Religion self-evidently disproves itself.
Embarassment to science? Do you know how old this man is? He's over 70. He has spent his entire life devoted to science, so hold your tongue. And now he, like many other great scientists and men (Sam Harris, etc)- are realizing the world that is emerging due to science. And it is in direct conflict with the religious opposition to civilization. So they speak out.
@qwert4327able His productive career will not amount to anything, if creationists remove science from school, to replace it with repainted Bronze Age mythology. His purpose isn't to talk about religion, it's to defend science, and it's both heartbreaking and infuriating that science even needs defending.
I have no problem with religion either, until it tells me the world was made by magic 6000 years ago and expects me to take it seriously.
It is impossible to prove or disprove that a God once created the Universe, and now refuses to interact with it. BUT, a religion is defined by its own dogma; every religion on this planet supposes to make statements about the world, which are blatantly untrue.
In a sane universe, that would be enough to have these religions dismissed as man-made; in our universe, there are people who dedicate their lives to defending them.
@qwert4327able Someone should talk about it. Why keep quiet? Just because something is hard or impossible to prove? That keeps one in ignorance. This is typical of the religious. Wanting to stay in ignorance is evidence religion is false. 'Proof' is a word the religious use without understanding. Maybe Dawkins is interested in fame and money. Maybe this is how he feels he can further pass on his genes. A child who inherits wealth has greater chance at survival and further procreation.
@qwert4327able I would think, the motives of Dawkins consists of this need to enlighten the whole of the community, or as in his case, the world. Science does little if the public is ignorant of the science found.
Death ~ The only thing in life that you can be certain of. Don't fear it, enjoy live while it lasts & make sure that you do your very best to help your fellow Human beings along the way & be remembered for being a good person & an example to others, by what you did not what you should have done. Because when it's over, you have missed your chance & you don't get another shot at it.
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
A sperm is just a messenger of dna from the male and they're all the same, so it doesn't matter which one makes it to the female egg. It's not like they are all different people. We only have one set of dna. There are millions of sperm to assure the success rate of conception.
The egg from the mother constitutes 50% of our dna as well.
@PaladinHludwig Have you ever picked up a biology textbook? Have you heard of crossing over which occurs in meiosis? Although it's true that numbers increase chances of conception, each sperm has had a slight rearrangement of its DNA such that two sperm will not give rise to the same person.
And the sperm actually had to make it to the egg, and your ancestors had to all live down the line to eventually create you, and you had to survive your time in the womb, childbirth, and then growing up to eventually become old enough to create a youtube account and comment on this video. And all of it happened on an ordinary planet with an ordinary yellow star in the corner of a rather ordinary galaxy in the universe.
Our births are incredibly unlikely, cosmically speaking.
Why cant people listen to this speech and try to understand the underlying beauty of it and take in the fact that we should enjoy everything around us for our minute moment of time here. It really is a very good speech if people just listened.
LOL we are going to die and that makes us the luky ones... oh ye? how about children who are born in the warfare and healfare and all that BS? they are lucky because they are alife do you call that living? look at the pictures all happy smiles and shit... every minute people die because they have nothing to eat... wheres the special on this guy? did he did anything about this problems? did he fought aginst the sistem? NOTHING BUT WORDS... OF WHAT COULD OR WOULD... STILL THE SAME SHIT
@SuatA91 "A cure for death"? What a selfish request! If such a thing existed, the world population would soon lead to a world so poisonous, life would not be worth living. Your reasoning is muddy indeed.
@SuatA91 How does there being death possibly mean that there is a god? Death is a natural process, the ceasing of life, the point where the brain stops firing electrical signals that make up our thoughts and feeling and our consciousness and keep our organs running. How does it in any way relate to the existence or non existence of god?
@SuatA91 Cure for death? You are a coward. Accept death, embrace it, realize you are never going to get another chance, and make the most of the existence that you have.
62.7 male life expect.-13 avg age of puberty for males-49.7 years of sperm product.-160,000,000 sperm/day-18140.5 days of sperm product.-18140.5*160000000= 2902480000000 sperm/male/life-3324047000 males
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
well daaa,of course you will end up with bunch of dump world view,when you denie the creator,ofcourse you have to accept the evolution,because there is no alternative answear for atheism.Just because its the answear to atheism,it doesnt mean its proven,just like creationists believe in God,the same way you have your religion,wich is a theory,not a fact.But ultist i believe in creation,that we where desighned by inteligensy,you believe in durt,that somehow in millions years turned to a human..
Topics: The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
or
figure4etc3.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
Talking about the human DNA but denying the creator,thats the true hypocrite standing in the stage and saying all my brother hypocrits we are so proud to be here,cause many will dream be a hypocrat like us.We dont as a matter of fact.As God said,that they followed to there own imagination,claiming to be wise actually became fools,Thats the group of fools...You guys wanna be with them? I dont.Cause im an ordinary man,who doesnt sick glory and power,in the name of a lie.
A dude who believes that he knows the answears,talking bunch of philosophy,and claiming to have a prove of evolution...Just because someone has read a lots of books doesnt make him the follower of truth.talking a bunch of pomopus word.I find no meaning in his words,rather stupidity...
@meyaxshavat Already is proof of evolution, and you're the one who's words are filled with stupidity. He's sharing his outlook on life so that others may take it into consideration who think oppositely (or are in need of an answer.)
@themixedarts yes also proof that homosapiens are millions of years older than though which the science world will not except because of fear of bein ostracised in the science world which would also blow charles darwins therory apart aswell as religion .open your mind and study more dont agree with the majority.
@mrricksta30 If there IS evidence why wouldn't they accept it and move on to new theories? Just because thier afraid of what other scientists would say? If they have solid proof wouldn't somone jump on that and prove everyone else wrong with it?
@themixedarts these people have tryed and had there career ruined there was a scientist a lady studig ancient aztec bones .she discoverd human bones hundreds of thousand years old the scientific world blew her apart ruined her because she refused to say there where not younger .listen just because there is a lot of evidence to prove charles darwins therory .there is a lot out there if you have a open mind to disprove .and im not religious but darwin for me does not hold the answer to homosapiens
third grade wtf im not a yankee rapist or a inbreed nonce case .what year are you did you pass junior and infant school .keep you american slangs to your self we dont do grades in the uk you arogant prick we do years mongole .
@Livilulu44 what a deluded fool .if i stuck my 9mm in your face you would belive what ever i told u .then id rape your arse and you would be my bitch .muppet .dont start a debate if you dont know what the fuvk you are going on about im not a mind reader retard .
@mrricksta30 You retard, you can't even spell! I'm sorry, but I can't take anything you say seriously when you can't spell basic words.
You call this a debate? Well, guess who won. I can't respond to an ignorant fool's angry comments. Were you raped as a child, so you have this weird desire to threaten rape on people you've exchanged few words with? Or are you a child. I guess a combination.
Have a nice life, loser. Keep weighing 400 pounds and living in your mother's basement.
@themixedarts --Did you graduate college or even attend. Can you read? Can you do a search for pro and con positions? Can you look at his OTHER videos where Dawkins HIMSELF says that we don't known who or what started the whole SHIZNIT to his evolution HYPOTHESIS? ARE AMERICANS REALLY THIS STUPID?
PIMP out Google and let the bitch do trix for you.
@DenActivist I'm not saying he said that, the fuck is wrong with you? I said there is proof of evolution and that his speech is for others who feel down about life may take this into consideration.
My problem is not them DISBELIEVING and talking trash about a supernatural being that can neither be proven nor unproven empirically, but the arrogance with which he speaks as if he KNOWS ANYTHING with any degree of certainty.
Science, at its BEST, deals with probability. Therefore, Mr. Dawkins, have a seat.
@DenActivist "Science, at its BEST, deals with probability"
Yep the probability that the Earth goes around the sun, that gravity, electricity, chemistry, physics all happen because of probability! It's a good thing that we understand the probabilities so much that we can use them to work out so much about how life and the universe works. This of course includes Evolution as the foundation of Biology.
Then when it comes to god - the probability it exists is so close to zero as it can be.
@mtbee9 --Oh great one, which theory of evolution do YOU subscribe to? I see you missed the part where Dawkins was CNT was PWNED by Ben Stein when Dawkins ADMITTED the probability of there being a designer. Oh. You missed that one, eh. Were you watching MTV that night?
@DenActivist "Dawkins was CNT was PWNED by Ben Stein"
Wow that will the day when Dawkins is Pwned by a know nothing like Stein. That is such a joke. LOL
Sure there is a probability of a god - it's pretty close to zero. Then within that probability the chances that this is god is exactly the one that you worship is astronomically small.
I'll stick with the larger probability that there isn't one!
@mtbee9 --Listen, Darwin's most EXCELLENT HYPOTHESIS is mental masturbation at best. Now, having said that, science has done a marvelous job in the field of molecular evolution--look that bych up and then holla at me. FYI - LOGICAL reasoning is MOST accurate when you go from the general to the specific (DEDUCTIVE reasoning), instead of from specific to the general (INDUCTIVE reasoning).
@DenActivist Well guy you stay with your delusions. Most scientists agree that Darwin's theory of Evolution is correct and it has never been falsified. So until you can come out with something to disprove it I'll stick with those who know more than you do.
Oh and I think you are the deluded one who needs to get a clue as you obviously don't have one. What a waste.
@DenActivist "They accent certain fundamentals points found in his theory, but no(t) the theory itself"
Assuming you are replying to my comments about scientist accepting the theory of evolution. Most scientists do.
Sorry you can think what you like but the facts are there for you to ignore if you wish.
So Den answer me this. What is the alternate theory for how life came to be? Please explain in reference to the fossil record and DNA so we can see how it all works/
@mtbee9 --The FACT we have in science and in "myth-landia" is that ALL things EVOLVE. Things must change in order for them to stay the same since change, evolution, is the constant. Look up what biologists Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould, then geneticist Eugene M. McCarthy, and some others. If you REALLY seek after finding out HOW (science) vs WHY (spiritual) man came got here go to evolution.berkeley.edu and start there. Riding the bandwagon for the sake of it, doesn't make us right.
@mtbee9 go here and look this up and then look at page 10 (National Academies Press) nap.edu
Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, Second Edition (1999)
"Darwin's original hypothesis has undergone extensive modification and expansion, but the central concepts Darwin's original hypothesis has undergone extensive modification and expansion, but the central concepts stand firm.
@mtbee9 -- Con't "Studies in genetics and molecular biology—fields unknown in Darwin's time—have explained the occurrence of the hereditary variations that are essential to natural selection. Genetic variations result from changes, or mutations, in the nucleotide sequence of DNA, the molecule that genes are made from. Such changes in DNA now can be detected and described with great precision."
@mtbee9 --I have no question. YOU got what you wear in a wad because I said Darwin's theory EVOLVED, 'member that moment? So you made certain assumptions like some people do and made ass out of the "bow fuh vus." ;-)
Here's one last link to prove, if not ingrain my thought on the subject that science, in order for it to REMAIN science must evolve. Science will not get to the "ultimate" truth, idt. Yet we should keep trying. sciencenews. org/view/ feature/id/40006/title/Molecular_Evolution
@mtbee9 --Are you serious? Do you REALLY believe that BS you just wrote? You sound like a Christian fundamentalist--STUPID. "[I]t has never been falsified." Dude, don't interact w/ me when you're simply talking out the other chute. With that ILL logic Christians are right to say, the concept of God "has never been falsified." Please, get a clue!
Hilter would have loved to have gotten a hold of you. In Darwins' words, the strong survives. YOU are the weakest link. Good-bye. (jk but not)
@mtbee9 --Yeah, that Hilter joke was dirty. But I laughed anyway. lol Weed out the bullsh!t in my comments. Look at the substance and message. These topics are way dull if you can inject some humor in it.
A question for atheists. In a world where there's no proof of God's existence or of life after death; how will you explain to your children why you brought them into the world and why they should die?
@dimaniak -- there should be no need to explain and God is really not "needed" in explaining why fools bring life into this world. However, on the same note, I don't think fools should breed. Their legs should be clamped closed for the sake of humanity.
C'mon, this video could kill me faster than I could choke myself. This guy is full of B.S. my first post was only about 0:32secs into the genious video of yet another waste of 2 mins.
WOW!!! I am going to die? I feel soo lucky, lol you can't have death without life because that's fukkin backwards buddy. You could say that our moon has the potental to seeing the light of day but,,, wait a minute... The Moon doesn't have eyes, and neither does a person who never exsisted. You know what else outnumber the sand grains of the Saraha? The ammount of babble that comes out of your mouth. Certainly unborn ghosts sound allot like "Angels to me" do you believe in angels RD?
That... didn't make me feel better about death in the slightest. The fact is, I'm alive now and I don't want to die. How dare you tell me to not fear death, when it means the end of all my universe?
@ObiOneGinobili Fact: You are going to die. You can decide to accept it... or delude yourself and live in constant fear of something you can't change. The sooner you accept that death is inevitable, the more fulfilling your short existence on this planet can be.
@beenn15 Well... isn't it the opposite? Forgetting about it is voluntary delusion, while fearing something bad that will certainly happen is... being realistic :p
Anyway I managed to forget about it until you decided to answer my post! Grrrr...
@ObiOneGinobili You sound like a bit of a coward. We're not saying you CAN'T be afraid of death, it is a natural human fear. It's okay to be scared. But as the saying goes, "if you know better, do better". We KNOW that we are going to die, so shouldn't we take that and learn from it? Make the most of the life that you have, instead of spending it worshipping something to ensure yourself more time.
Hmm... This one disappoints me, because I didn't expect him to refer to "never born people" as if there are such beings, for whom we should have sympathy. It implies there are souls that were never born. I know that's not what he meant, but it sure sounded that way to me.
this final statement of Sir Dawkins made me cry. Epiphany. You know when you come to a point in your life where you realize that you did not ask a any man in the sky to create you and yet you are created and you have to make the most out of your life while you still live. It is striving to be more of who you are presently and I really like the fact that there is no afterlife in the sense that I can live a more fulfilling life because I live my life to the fullest.
Jinglepify 1 day ago
i just like weed
jesussmokes1 1 week ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Good Video. Thanks for shared, Very Infomative..
Spasatcom 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
GET READY FOR THE GREAT WARNING NOW!!!
thewarningsecondcoming . com
JezusSlave 4 weeks ago
my video respond includes this video, with greek subtitles. It's a tribute to Hitchens, inclunding words by ordinary ppl that never heard Dawkins or Hitchens, their words are similar though. It's a trailer, by following link on description, you are led to the main video
FATFREDDY666GR 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Territomauvais I'm sure you have read the Bible, on the surface, but not in its historical and chronological and hermeneutical context.
Do a google search for "David Cameron criticised by Richard Dawkins" by Simon Peter Sutherland (Thats me) and you can read what I have written about him. His whole understanding of the Law of Moses for today is an error. Also search for "Richard Dawkins is wrong: Martin Luther was not against “Reason” or “Logical correctness”.
God bless
SPS
Zwemer100 1 month ago
Comment removed
Zwemer100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment" Hebrews 9: 27
Zwemer100 1 month ago
no afterlife - only matter and energy, forever moving into new forms. That's the universe. That's us. We are a part of the universe that became conscious for a while, and maybe it will again, somewhere, sometime. I understand the secret of the universe now. The "meaning" of life. All religions become laugable and meaningless when you understand this. So never try to convince me again. You have lost, you have chosen the loosing team if you believe religion. It's a crashing plane. Happy landing.
aboyborninjune 1 month ago
Thumbs up if you stood up and clapped.
PaladinswordSaurfang 1 month ago 10
RIP Christopher Hitchens!
hopelessgravity 1 month ago
yes you are going to die soon, and you are going to hell
people like you are the raison why hell exists
by the way jesus is a messenger of god, not god
god is the one ho created everything, he has no son and no parents, and nothing is like him
h0ucine1 1 month ago
@h0ucine1 Entirely agreed. Nothing else IS like him. Everything else actually exists!
GrantRants 1 month ago
h0ucine1 1 month ago
@h0ucine1 Wow. That is one of the funnier things I've ever read.
I'm going to make one attempt to show you how problematic that "logic" is:
I believe the only thing that exists is the Giant Cosmic Hippopotamus. It ate God two time cycles ago and farted it out into the Andromeda Galaxy.
Prove to me it DOESN'T exist! You can't? HAHA, SO IT MUST.
GrantRants 1 month ago
h0ucine1 1 month ago
@h0ucine1 Seems I was worth the couple minutes it took to write your unintelligible "retorts".
As for that last part? Read it. Didn't care much for it. Was just about as loony as the Bible... A little less human sacrifice, a little more pedophile marriage. Frankly, if I want to believe in magic, I'd believe in Harry Potter instead. At least I get a pet owl in that one.
GrantRants 1 month ago
Richard Dawkins is such a perfect spokesperson for the Atheist community. He can truly see all the beauty in life without needing to put a god in front of it, and he is a magnificent poet, the way he writes all of his speeches. This video just reminded me how lucky I am to be alive.
knuckles91444 1 month ago
Only atheist can say something like that. Respect! Period!
nikhilr57 1 month ago
laws of science easily disprove a grand old man with a beard to control and build a universe so vast would take the same amount of energy to form . why would a vast immense entity give two shits for a personal connection to a pale blue dot something that to it is equal too an electron
drek456ful 1 month ago in playlist More videos from FFreeThinker
What a great man
thinkboutit 1 month ago
Atheists maintain that intelligence arises out of meaningless, random chaos; and is continually evolving via meaningless, random chaos.
The secular Greeks concluded via rational thought and critical observation that in the beginning there was Nous/Logos (Intelligence and Language i.e. the MIND of GOD and Symbolic Information). This great observation, made thousands of years ago, has been proven true by DNA.
Mr88playmaker 2 months ago
@Mr88playmaker Incorrect. There is nothing chaotic about natural selection, and it is about as random as rolling a 200-sided die 1000000000 times and hoping for a 200 at least once..
TheExtremistModerate 1 month ago
@TheExtremistModerate
Evolutionists maintain that information is matter.
ID'ers maintain that information is neither matter nor energy.
The fact alone that DNA contains info/language proves that the "mathematical chance" of genetic code arising via "natural selection" is ZERO.
Mr88playmaker 1 month ago
@Mr88playmaker False. When you get into the scope of millions of years, "information"(which is not an appropriate word) is created through purely natural means in some cases. DNA is "information" in the same way the shape of a mountain is "information." It is not actual data, though data can be taken from it.
Understand?
TheExtremistModerate 1 month ago
Comment removed
unnim 2 months ago
@unnim He never said that. In short, he said:
"We have the privilege of experiencing this world. A privilege not granted to many potential lives. Why should we complain that we're going to die? We should live life to the fullest."
TheExtremistModerate 1 month ago
Bill O'reilly has 83 accounts on youtube ;)
nikhilr57 2 months ago
WOW THAT JUST BLEW MY MIND!!!!!
SmokeRanarrrrr 2 months ago
What's the song used in this video?
SlickLikeNinja 2 months ago
Richard Dawkins is a fucking loser...Haha refused to debate Dr.William Lane Craig..He is a fucking chicken and coward..Fuck yo mo'fo..
Richardstupid1 2 months ago
@Richardstupid1 I challenged William Lane Craig to a debate. he didn't show up. Fucking coward.
TheExtremistModerate 2 months ago
@TheExtremistModerate why wouldn't richard dawkins showed up at bill craig's debate ...in the words of @TheExtremistModerate dawkins is a fucking coward...your words mate..
hotshotsunnyz 2 months ago
@hotshotsunnyz I was parodying @Richardstupid1's "logic." Scroll down a bit. He said (paraphrasing) "Because he refused to "debate" William Craig, he's a coward."
I was turning his logic on himself.
Richard Dawkins has more important things to do, and has declined debate offers from people far more prestigious positions. He is not a coward, WLC is an idiot for trying to say that when he got rejected. It's rather childish.
"Debate me."
"No thanks."
"YOU'RE A COWARD!"
TheExtremistModerate 2 months ago
Cure aging then bitches
Apemanwithcalculator 3 months ago
Beautiful :)
RealistMe 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
SpencerBenedict2nd 3 months ago
ATTENTION: (The Rationalizer) - Your 'threat by proxy' was a flimsy excuse to block me. Immature and bad form !!!!!!
hamzah938 3 months ago
i realized this as a kid
gosh i'm smart
purplehaze216 3 months ago 3
@purplehaze216 But i would damn well bet you didn't, coudn't and can't frase it as poetically as this.
reanimated6 2 months ago
Comment removed
shubhamkilla2 3 months ago
@shubhamkilla2 I disliked it, but only for the "how dare we whine" part. The fact I'm alive despite the vast improbability of my existence is amazing and all but that doesn't make it suck any less that it's going to end some day... if anything it makes it worth defending and preserving as long as possible that much more.
WhiteDragon103 3 months ago in playlist More videos from FFreeThinker
@WhiteDragon103
Would you rather not exist than exist for a short period and not experience the vast beauty of nature?
007rosin 3 months ago
@WhiteDragon103 how dare we whine when we are ridiculously lucky to be here. We get the chance that billions do not. Appreciate life and be thankful is the message.
Mr Dawkins i salute you.
Ali74 1 month ago
@shubhamkilla2 I disliked this video. Make that number 83.
M3PanoS 2 months ago
THIS might be one of his best & most intriguing vids.
In a sense almost religious - if you'll forgive me using that word
Meaning: deep beyond everyday's comprenhension of things, creating a sense of wonder & even magic
One minute only... wow
TheMathScientist 3 months ago
this is the beautiful truth
WampaStomper 3 months ago
This guy Dawkins shouldn't be allowed on TV or the internet because he speaks the truth and brainwashed religious people get their feelings hurt. I'm calling my teddy bear Dawkins as a protest.
kansaimagic 3 months ago
I don't usually say this, but that was...beautiful :')
TeeGeeFan 3 months ago
We can accept the inevitability of death, but we will still fear death. Without the fear, why try and protect our life?
freethinkerer 3 months ago
@freethinkerer
I certainly don't fear death. Why should I? It is pain most people fear, not death. I fully accept I wasn't around for billions of years before I was born, so why should I worry about death and not being around any more?
TheodorePike 3 months ago
@TheodorePike I don't fear death in those respect either, but I do not want to die and this great wish for life, keeps me in some sort of fear of a premature death. I wish to accomplish more in this life. I believe in no afterlife.
Yes, take me out quickly if death is coming, please. Dr, Kevorkian to my side if needed.
freethinkerer 3 months ago
@freethinkerer
Indeed. I have never quite understood why anybody would consider the idea of an afterlife a good thing anyway. If it turned out there was "something else" then all that means is that this life, and everything in it, was a complete and utter waste of time and of course, fake.
TheodorePike 3 months ago
@TheodorePike I can understand why people invented the idea of an afterlife. All animals strive to stay alive. We all have instincts to stay alive. We run from predators.
Our imagination surely drove the idea of how we could escape the predator in some ultimate manner.
Anyone grounded in reality should know, this imaginary idea does not allow us to escape the predators that cause death. Permanent death.
freethinkerer 3 months ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
I found this video difficult to masturbate to
Fondrom 2 months ago
@freethinkerer
Immanuel Kant had a different idea for why we have an afterlife. So the idea that we only have this idea because of some uber-self-preservation concept is wrong.
AgApE010 1 month ago
@AgApE010 OK, so what did Kant say? I can believe, there might be more than one reason to irrational beliefs. I just point out the most common ones.
freethinkerer 1 month ago
@freethinkerer
Why am I not surprised that a YouTube atheist calls a genius like Kant irrational? You people have no limits of lowness.
Kant argued on the basis of a need for justice to be satisfied. It is contrary to reason, wrote Kant, that when we follow objective morality that we should not receive due compensation. The evil receive good, the good receive evil. But this cannot continue forever. Since justice is not satisfied in this life, there must be a next one in which it will...
AgApE010 1 month ago
@AgApE010 If this is the last word of what Kant said of the idea, then he is wishful thinking. Kant is not a god, and thus cannot know all. There is not perfect justice. To expect such is just a product of religious indoctrination. Has there ever been philosopher who was correct on all things?
freethinkerer 1 month ago
@freethinkerer
Kant was not indoctrinated. He was quite the freethinker. Although himself a theist, he questioned and critiqued many of the traditional arguments for God's existence. So this is not someone desperately trying to "prove God."
You must understand Kant's conclusions on the basis of his idea of objective ethics, which he derived through reason alone (i.e., his "categorical imperative"). If reason gives us ethics, reason necessitates that ethic's demands be satisfied.
AgApE010 1 month ago
@AgApE010 And I am supposed to believe you know if Kant was indoctrinated or not? Most religious would never admit to any indoctrination, yet 80% of all peoples follow the religion of their parents. Indoctrination. Just because Kant may not follow specific religion, does not mean the society he learned from was not so god fearing, that he was impervious to its indoctrination. Justice comes in many forms. Sometimes just a loss of real friends. Live in all forms of nature has no exact justice.
freethinkerer 1 month ago
@AgApE010 Keep in mind, Kant was dead before the theory of evolution, much less the wonderful findings that the theory explains of our mind. Ones burdened guilt is justice.
freethinkerer 1 month ago
@freethinkerer
....Kant used his argument to argue for both an afterlife and God's existence (as the judge).
AgApE010 1 month ago
@freethinkerer So man does not have a soul then or a spirit? If not how do you account for consciousness? Or spiritual connection between human beings?
Are you going to deny spiritual connection between souls? If so; Are you human? Do you have red blood in you?
Zwemer100 1 month ago
@Zwemer100 No, I and most scientists do not believe in a soul or spirits. Our conscience is explained by our large brain and its large capacity to formulate, thus, it enables imagination. The apes that evolved this capacity were enabled to survive climate change by using innovation instead of brute strength. There is no great mystery of souls, now that science has come so far. That god gap has closed.
freethinkerer 4 weeks ago
@freethinkerer I never mentioned conscience, but consciousness, thats not the same thing.
Well, like you say, "I and most scientists do not believe in a soul or spirits" well, you say it all, thats your belief and it is based upon their opinions.
Fact you say? No, thats your and their opinions also.
Zwemer100 4 weeks ago
@Zwemer100 Watch the documentary- 'BBC Horizon - The Secret You', here on youtube. Should help explain.
DerrenBrown100 3 weeks ago
@DerrenBrown100 Computers, screens, scanners, ideas and scientific opinion, nothing more. Theists have been talking about how science cannot answer "who I am" for a long time and now they attempt to programme us with this. Which is nothing more than a denial of religious philosophy, based upon scientific philosophy.
Well, guess what? I deny this scientific philosophy, which does not work outside of its own reasoning.
Thanks for the suggestion, but no cigar.
Zwemer100 3 weeks ago
@Zwemer100 Science came from philosophy. It is a system of knowledge attained through experimentation and observation that guides us through the world and see it as it really, truly is, and not as we wish it to be. It is the greatest idea that philosophy gave us. There are no boundaries that keep this kind of reason at bay, only other than that of religious stupidity, a rejection of what one wishes not to hear., which grants us not only little benefit, but hardships more than anything
blobvision 2 weeks ago
@DerrenBrown100 Also, one issue the programme rather glossed over was regarding the results of experiments which have to be interpreted. The results are interpreted according to a scientific method or philosophy, which outside of itself, does not work. Thus, it is the interpretation of the facts that are so often faulty, not the facts themselves.
Zwemer100 3 weeks ago
@Zwemer100 Same answer for consciousness, as that is what I was thinking of anyway.
I disbelieve in gods for hundreds,if not thousands of reasons. Science being on my side is just a bonus and can back up many of my reasons with actual evidence.
Care to show what I claimed as fact and not opinion?
Your religious beliefs are all of opinion, and none have any evidence to show it is at all factual. Most are of the following of opinion of ancient, unscientific, superstitious, barbaric, men.
freethinkerer 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Zwemer100 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Zwemer100 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@freethinkerer Your words display either bigotry or ignorance, little to do with freethinking.
You say, "none have any evidence to show it is at all factual". That is pathetic.
You worship science and a system of thought and fact. What science? Orthodox science of Unorthodox science?
Outside of your Orthodox mainstream scientific systems, your so-called facts are not facts at all, just ideas, theories and speculation. Nothing more.
"There are two sides to every truth."
Zwemer100 3 weeks ago
@freethinkerer - It's the number one instinct, "stay alive". In fact it's so ground in us that we have very little control over it. Oddly we do when we feel others depend on us, which i find fascinating but also sad by it as religion hijack thats vulnerability in a way that you couldn't do using plain logic and reason alone.
iLIKEtotallyL0VEit 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system to suit their Evo-Hoax agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
SpencerBenedict2nd 3 months ago
People who idolise dawkins are pathetic. He has completely abandoned his productive career as a scientist to talk about religion. 1. nobody cares and you are wasting all our and your time 2. its pointless as you can neither disprove or prove religion. Embarrassment to science and only interested in the money and fame I expect.
qwert4327able 3 months ago
@qwert4327able A creator of the Universe cannot be disproved. Religion self-evidently disproves itself.
Embarassment to science? Do you know how old this man is? He's over 70. He has spent his entire life devoted to science, so hold your tongue. And now he, like many other great scientists and men (Sam Harris, etc)- are realizing the world that is emerging due to science. And it is in direct conflict with the religious opposition to civilization. So they speak out.
Territomauvais 3 months ago 8
@qwert4327able His productive career will not amount to anything, if creationists remove science from school, to replace it with repainted Bronze Age mythology. His purpose isn't to talk about religion, it's to defend science, and it's both heartbreaking and infuriating that science even needs defending.
I have no problem with religion either, until it tells me the world was made by magic 6000 years ago and expects me to take it seriously.
StrikaAmaru 3 months ago
@qwert4327able "(dis)prove religion"
Religion and God are not identical.
It is impossible to prove or disprove that a God once created the Universe, and now refuses to interact with it. BUT, a religion is defined by its own dogma; every religion on this planet supposes to make statements about the world, which are blatantly untrue.
In a sane universe, that would be enough to have these religions dismissed as man-made; in our universe, there are people who dedicate their lives to defending them.
StrikaAmaru 3 months ago
@qwert4327able Someone should talk about it. Why keep quiet? Just because something is hard or impossible to prove? That keeps one in ignorance. This is typical of the religious. Wanting to stay in ignorance is evidence religion is false. 'Proof' is a word the religious use without understanding. Maybe Dawkins is interested in fame and money. Maybe this is how he feels he can further pass on his genes. A child who inherits wealth has greater chance at survival and further procreation.
freethinkerer 3 months ago
@qwert4327able
Nobody cares, yet even you decided to search for him on youtube and comment on a video of him. Hmm....
ChristianInvisibles 3 months ago
@qwert4327able I would think, the motives of Dawkins consists of this need to enlighten the whole of the community, or as in his case, the world. Science does little if the public is ignorant of the science found.
freethinkerer 1 month ago
Death ~ The only thing in life that you can be certain of. Don't fear it, enjoy live while it lasts & make sure that you do your very best to help your fellow Human beings along the way & be remembered for being a good person & an example to others, by what you did not what you should have done. Because when it's over, you have missed your chance & you don't get another shot at it.
ACCSESS247 4 months ago
@ACCSESS247 That should read life not live. Sorry
ACCSESS247 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dawkins is so right. Abortion is wrong and against God's will.
ChristianInvisibles 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 4 months ago
What luck?
A sperm is just a messenger of dna from the male and they're all the same, so it doesn't matter which one makes it to the female egg. It's not like they are all different people. We only have one set of dna. There are millions of sperm to assure the success rate of conception.
The egg from the mother constitutes 50% of our dna as well.
PaladinHludwig 4 months ago
@PaladinHludwig Have you ever picked up a biology textbook? Have you heard of crossing over which occurs in meiosis? Although it's true that numbers increase chances of conception, each sperm has had a slight rearrangement of its DNA such that two sperm will not give rise to the same person.
tmax619 3 months ago
Comment removed
PaladinHludwig 3 months ago
@PaladinHludwig
And the sperm actually had to make it to the egg, and your ancestors had to all live down the line to eventually create you, and you had to survive your time in the womb, childbirth, and then growing up to eventually become old enough to create a youtube account and comment on this video. And all of it happened on an ordinary planet with an ordinary yellow star in the corner of a rather ordinary galaxy in the universe.
Our births are incredibly unlikely, cosmically speaking.
ChristianInvisibles 3 months ago
we are incredibly lucky
Ali74 4 months ago
*sigh*
It sucks that religious people won't exist to know that they won't go to heaven...
...they'll be dead.
Livilulu44 4 months ago
Comment removed
RodKREAT 4 months ago
Why cant people listen to this speech and try to understand the underlying beauty of it and take in the fact that we should enjoy everything around us for our minute moment of time here. It really is a very good speech if people just listened.
Muipha 4 months ago
LOL we are going to die and that makes us the luky ones... oh ye? how about children who are born in the warfare and healfare and all that BS? they are lucky because they are alife do you call that living? look at the pictures all happy smiles and shit... every minute people die because they have nothing to eat... wheres the special on this guy? did he did anything about this problems? did he fought aginst the sistem? NOTHING BUT WORDS... OF WHAT COULD OR WOULD... STILL THE SAME SHIT
jmmp112 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jmmp112 So you would promote euthanasia for those people? If you have no point don't argue.
gnarkillkicksass 4 months ago
background music makes it sound 50 times more epic than the original footage ahahaha
MikeDabaze 4 months ago
I find everyone's debate rather shallow and pedantic.
exposingbuffoons 5 months ago 2
@exposingbuffoons Indeed, shallow and pedantic!
Rustygiz 4 months ago
I heard someone voice a lovely insult related to this, along the lines of:
"75 million sperm and YOU won the race?!"
carmium 5 months ago 19
O, dwakings, you accept death right? that means there is god right? i bet u going to say No. so can u please find the cure for death?!!!
SuatA91 5 months ago
@SuatA91 What does death has to do with god? O.o
qqbloodlover 5 months ago
@SuatA91 Why would accepting death mean there would be a god?
SuperMrAtheist 5 months ago
@SuatA91 "A cure for death"? What a selfish request! If such a thing existed, the world population would soon lead to a world so poisonous, life would not be worth living. Your reasoning is muddy indeed.
worktosser 5 months ago
@worktosser Well said!
Livilulu44 4 months ago
@SuatA91 How does there being death possibly mean that there is a god? Death is a natural process, the ceasing of life, the point where the brain stops firing electrical signals that make up our thoughts and feeling and our consciousness and keep our organs running. How does it in any way relate to the existence or non existence of god?
iseezapie 5 months ago
@SuatA91 Cure for death? You are a coward. Accept death, embrace it, realize you are never going to get another chance, and make the most of the existence that you have.
Livilulu44 4 months ago
english is my secondary language,not bad for 5 years.
meyaxshavat 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
62.7 male life expect.-13 avg age of puberty for males-49.7 years of sperm product.-160,000,000 sperm/day-18140.5 days of sperm product.-18140.5*160000000= 2902480000000 sperm/male/life-3324047000 males
3324047000 * 2902480000000 = 9647979936560000000000 sperm/males/62.7yrs-2902480000000 females
400 menstruations/life-2,902,480,000,000 * 400 = 1,160,992,000,000,000/eggs/all women/life-1,160,992,000,000,000 * 9,647,979,936,560,000,000,000 =
11,201,227,522,506,667,520,000,000,000,000,000,000
w215philly 5 months ago 4
Comment removed
w215philly 5 months ago
Comment removed
w215philly 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
I am going to live ...
TzeffNL 5 months ago
well daaa,of course you will end up with bunch of dump world view,when you denie the creator,ofcourse you have to accept the evolution,because there is no alternative answear for atheism.Just because its the answear to atheism,it doesnt mean its proven,just like creationists believe in God,the same way you have your religion,wich is a theory,not a fact.But ultist i believe in creation,that we where desighned by inteligensy,you believe in durt,that somehow in millions years turned to a human..
meyaxshavat 5 months ago
@meyaxshavat Call us back once you have mastered spelling. I don't think you are ready.
topperheartramada 5 months ago
@meyaxshavat You believe a magic man in the sky made man out of dirt, somehow.
freethinkerer 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
or
figure4etc3.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
I think he is a very good scientist, writer and theoretician but, he is such a fucking closet Christian, I always call him Dorky!
spacedreams2111 5 months ago
Talking about the human DNA but denying the creator,thats the true hypocrite standing in the stage and saying all my brother hypocrits we are so proud to be here,cause many will dream be a hypocrat like us.We dont as a matter of fact.As God said,that they followed to there own imagination,claiming to be wise actually became fools,Thats the group of fools...You guys wanna be with them? I dont.Cause im an ordinary man,who doesnt sick glory and power,in the name of a lie.
meyaxshavat 5 months ago
A dude who believes that he knows the answears,talking bunch of philosophy,and claiming to have a prove of evolution...Just because someone has read a lots of books doesnt make him the follower of truth.talking a bunch of pomopus word.I find no meaning in his words,rather stupidity...
meyaxshavat 5 months ago
@meyaxshavat Already is proof of evolution, and you're the one who's words are filled with stupidity. He's sharing his outlook on life so that others may take it into consideration who think oppositely (or are in need of an answer.)
themixedarts 5 months ago
@themixedarts yes also proof that homosapiens are millions of years older than though which the science world will not except because of fear of bein ostracised in the science world which would also blow charles darwins therory apart aswell as religion .open your mind and study more dont agree with the majority.
mrricksta30 5 months ago
@mrricksta30 If there IS evidence why wouldn't they accept it and move on to new theories? Just because thier afraid of what other scientists would say? If they have solid proof wouldn't somone jump on that and prove everyone else wrong with it?
themixedarts 5 months ago
@themixedarts these people have tryed and had there career ruined there was a scientist a lady studig ancient aztec bones .she discoverd human bones hundreds of thousand years old the scientific world blew her apart ruined her because she refused to say there where not younger .listen just because there is a lot of evidence to prove charles darwins therory .there is a lot out there if you have a open mind to disprove .and im not religious but darwin for me does not hold the answer to homosapiens
mrricksta30 5 months ago
@mrricksta30 Yeah. Come back when you pass third grade.
Livilulu44 4 months ago
third grade wtf im not a yankee rapist or a inbreed nonce case .what year are you did you pass junior and infant school .keep you american slangs to your self we dont do grades in the uk you arogant prick we do years mongole .
mrricksta30 4 months ago
Comment removed
Livilulu44 4 months ago
@mrricksta30 Calm down, a**hole, there was no way for me to tell where you lived.
Come back when you pass infant school. Happy?
Livilulu44 4 months ago
@Livilulu44 what a deluded fool .if i stuck my 9mm in your face you would belive what ever i told u .then id rape your arse and you would be my bitch .muppet .dont start a debate if you dont know what the fuvk you are going on about im not a mind reader retard .
mrricksta30 4 months ago
@mrricksta30 You retard, you can't even spell! I'm sorry, but I can't take anything you say seriously when you can't spell basic words.
You call this a debate? Well, guess who won. I can't respond to an ignorant fool's angry comments. Were you raped as a child, so you have this weird desire to threaten rape on people you've exchanged few words with? Or are you a child. I guess a combination.
Have a nice life, loser. Keep weighing 400 pounds and living in your mother's basement.
Livilulu44 4 months ago
@themixedarts --Did you graduate college or even attend. Can you read? Can you do a search for pro and con positions? Can you look at his OTHER videos where Dawkins HIMSELF says that we don't known who or what started the whole SHIZNIT to his evolution HYPOTHESIS? ARE AMERICANS REALLY THIS STUPID?
PIMP out Google and let the bitch do trix for you.
Den Activist!
DenActivist 5 months ago
@DenActivist I'm not saying he said that, the fuck is wrong with you? I said there is proof of evolution and that his speech is for others who feel down about life may take this into consideration.
themixedarts 5 months ago
My problem is not them DISBELIEVING and talking trash about a supernatural being that can neither be proven nor unproven empirically, but the arrogance with which he speaks as if he KNOWS ANYTHING with any degree of certainty.
Science, at its BEST, deals with probability. Therefore, Mr. Dawkins, have a seat.
DenActivist 6 months ago
@DenActivist "Science, at its BEST, deals with probability"
Yep the probability that the Earth goes around the sun, that gravity, electricity, chemistry, physics all happen because of probability! It's a good thing that we understand the probabilities so much that we can use them to work out so much about how life and the universe works. This of course includes Evolution as the foundation of Biology.
Then when it comes to god - the probability it exists is so close to zero as it can be.
mtbee9 5 months ago
@mtbee9 --Oh great one, which theory of evolution do YOU subscribe to? I see you missed the part where Dawkins was CNT was PWNED by Ben Stein when Dawkins ADMITTED the probability of there being a designer. Oh. You missed that one, eh. Were you watching MTV that night?
DenActivist 5 months ago
@DenActivist "Dawkins was CNT was PWNED by Ben Stein"
Wow that will the day when Dawkins is Pwned by a know nothing like Stein. That is such a joke. LOL
Sure there is a probability of a god - it's pretty close to zero. Then within that probability the chances that this is god is exactly the one that you worship is astronomically small.
I'll stick with the larger probability that there isn't one!
mtbee9 5 months ago
@mtbee9 --Listen, Darwin's most EXCELLENT HYPOTHESIS is mental masturbation at best. Now, having said that, science has done a marvelous job in the field of molecular evolution--look that bych up and then holla at me. FYI - LOGICAL reasoning is MOST accurate when you go from the general to the specific (DEDUCTIVE reasoning), instead of from specific to the general (INDUCTIVE reasoning).
Holla acha Den when you get a clue. ;-)
DenActivist 5 months ago
@DenActivist Well guy you stay with your delusions. Most scientists agree that Darwin's theory of Evolution is correct and it has never been falsified. So until you can come out with something to disprove it I'll stick with those who know more than you do.
Oh and I think you are the deluded one who needs to get a clue as you obviously don't have one. What a waste.
mtbee9 5 months ago
Comment removed
DenActivist 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mtbee9 --no they don't. They accent certain fundamentals points found in his theory. The theory itself, in Darwin's term, EVOLVED. LMFAO!
DenActivist 5 months ago
@DenActivist "They accent certain fundamentals points found in his theory, but no(t) the theory itself"
Assuming you are replying to my comments about scientist accepting the theory of evolution. Most scientists do.
Sorry you can think what you like but the facts are there for you to ignore if you wish.
So Den answer me this. What is the alternate theory for how life came to be? Please explain in reference to the fossil record and DNA so we can see how it all works/
mtbee9 5 months ago
@mtbee9 --The FACT we have in science and in "myth-landia" is that ALL things EVOLVE. Things must change in order for them to stay the same since change, evolution, is the constant. Look up what biologists Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould, then geneticist Eugene M. McCarthy, and some others. If you REALLY seek after finding out HOW (science) vs WHY (spiritual) man came got here go to evolution.berkeley.edu and start there. Riding the bandwagon for the sake of it, doesn't make us right.
DenActivist 5 months ago
Comment removed
DenActivist 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mtbee9 go here and look this up and then look at page 10 (National Academies Press) nap.edu
Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, Second Edition (1999)
"Darwin's original hypothesis has undergone extensive modification and expansion, but the central concepts Darwin's original hypothesis has undergone extensive modification and expansion, but the central concepts stand firm.
DenActivist 5 months ago
@mtbee9 -- Con't "Studies in genetics and molecular biology—fields unknown in Darwin's time—have explained the occurrence of the hereditary variations that are essential to natural selection. Genetic variations result from changes, or mutations, in the nucleotide sequence of DNA, the molecule that genes are made from. Such changes in DNA now can be detected and described with great precision."
DenActivist 5 months ago
@DenActivist "have explained the occurrence of the hereditary variations that are essential to natural selection"
Agreed nothing wrong with that!
The whole article seems to be pro evolution. Makes sense so far!
Do you have a question?
Sorry for the typo 'Evolution gas' - should of course be: has never been falsified.
mtbee9 5 months ago
@mtbee9 --I have no question. YOU got what you wear in a wad because I said Darwin's theory EVOLVED, 'member that moment? So you made certain assumptions like some people do and made ass out of the "bow fuh vus." ;-)
Here's one last link to prove, if not ingrain my thought on the subject that science, in order for it to REMAIN science must evolve. Science will not get to the "ultimate" truth, idt. Yet we should keep trying. sciencenews. org/view/ feature/id/40006/title/Molecular_Evolution
DenActivist 5 months ago
@mtbee9 --Are you serious? Do you REALLY believe that BS you just wrote? You sound like a Christian fundamentalist--STUPID. "[I]t has never been falsified." Dude, don't interact w/ me when you're simply talking out the other chute. With that ILL logic Christians are right to say, the concept of God "has never been falsified." Please, get a clue!
Hilter would have loved to have gotten a hold of you. In Darwins' words, the strong survives. YOU are the weakest link. Good-bye. (jk but not)
DenActivist 5 months ago
@DenActivist HI Den, you still out there.
Well sorry but Evolution gas never been falsified - unless you can give me some evidence of this.
As for you - why bring up hitler? What has he got to do with anything? You really are scraping the bottom of the barrel!
mtbee9 5 months ago
@mtbee9 --Yeah, that Hilter joke was dirty. But I laughed anyway. lol Weed out the bullsh!t in my comments. Look at the substance and message. These topics are way dull if you can inject some humor in it.
Take care.
DenActivist 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A question for atheists. In a world where there's no proof of God's existence or of life after death; how will you explain to your children why you brought them into the world and why they should die?
dimaniak 6 months ago
@dimaniak -- there should be no need to explain and God is really not "needed" in explaining why fools bring life into this world. However, on the same note, I don't think fools should breed. Their legs should be clamped closed for the sake of humanity.
DenActivist 5 months ago
C'mon, this video could kill me faster than I could choke myself. This guy is full of B.S. my first post was only about 0:32secs into the genious video of yet another waste of 2 mins.
86devilheadz 6 months ago
WOW!!! I am going to die? I feel soo lucky, lol you can't have death without life because that's fukkin backwards buddy. You could say that our moon has the potental to seeing the light of day but,,, wait a minute... The Moon doesn't have eyes, and neither does a person who never exsisted. You know what else outnumber the sand grains of the Saraha? The ammount of babble that comes out of your mouth. Certainly unborn ghosts sound allot like "Angels to me" do you believe in angels RD?
86devilheadz 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@86devilheadz Do you expect me to believe you are so dumb that you can't understand what he is saying?
RedSandStudios 6 months ago
Dawkins is overrated fool
gogolplex74 6 months ago
@gogolplex74 You're the genius we've been waiting for!
D3maine 6 months ago
@gogolplex74 Get your filth out of this beautiful video... foo!
charlieking100 6 months ago
That... didn't make me feel better about death in the slightest. The fact is, I'm alive now and I don't want to die. How dare you tell me to not fear death, when it means the end of all my universe?
ObiOneGinobili 6 months ago
@ObiOneGinobili Fact: You are going to die. You can decide to accept it... or delude yourself and live in constant fear of something you can't change. The sooner you accept that death is inevitable, the more fulfilling your short existence on this planet can be.
beenn15 6 months ago
@beenn15 Well... isn't it the opposite? Forgetting about it is voluntary delusion, while fearing something bad that will certainly happen is... being realistic :p
Anyway I managed to forget about it until you decided to answer my post! Grrrr...
ObiOneGinobili 6 months ago
@ObiOneGinobili and im here to remind you again
frootofaloom 5 months ago
@ObiOneGinobili You sound like a bit of a coward. We're not saying you CAN'T be afraid of death, it is a natural human fear. It's okay to be scared. But as the saying goes, "if you know better, do better". We KNOW that we are going to die, so shouldn't we take that and learn from it? Make the most of the life that you have, instead of spending it worshipping something to ensure yourself more time.
Livilulu44 4 months ago
I'm standing in applause with them.
TheBiAtheist 6 months ago
that was an amazing speech.
k0rps3gynd3r 6 months ago
74 people think they won't die
elcap22 6 months ago
74 creationist shouldn't have internet access.
Phiru808 6 months ago 2
Hmm... This one disappoints me, because I didn't expect him to refer to "never born people" as if there are such beings, for whom we should have sympathy. It implies there are souls that were never born. I know that's not what he meant, but it sure sounded that way to me.
pburto 6 months ago
@pburto He's saying that the numbers of the living dwarf the combinations of DNA that didn't result in life. That we are the lucky ones.
truvelocity 6 months ago