Nice. I know of this version and a few others (like the Twickenham Studio soundtrack recordings, and the Beatles Anthology recording), but I love the song and wish there were more complete versions out there.
it sounds that way because it was recorded , throught the Wi\zenwherller and backtracked with a mic pinged to the open ended Vieserqueser return value,,,, But , it works
I think Paul had said something llike: Hey, I can make a song like John does... and out came "do it in the road" .. alternately John made "everybody's got something to hide"
Owch. God Paul...How could you have stood more than one take of this. Your throat must me made of Iron...And I thought Twist and Shout was hard...Jesu. Jesu...Jesu..The Beatles are forever.
Wow Paul sounds really rough at the first chorus. I love it when his vocals morphs like that, like in Golden Slumber. To me, it sounds rather (strangely) sexy. Sigh, if I only I lived in the 60s.
People seem to think of John as the one with the "rocker" voice, but Paul could pull it off pretty well too. I love them both, their voices are so different, but so good, and they sounded great together.
@rleary1 I guess it is hard to say what kind of voice they each had because they could sing in so many different voices or styles or whatever you want to call it, but they could definitely both pull off the "rocker" voice in their own unique ways.
@HollieKR Paul's vocals were miles ahead of John's. Songs like Helter Skelter, Oh, Darling, I've Got a Feeling, I'm Down, and Long Tall Sally blow most everything John did out of the water.
I agree with Rikenrocker. In 69 I don't think John would have been able to do this better than Paul, despite what he said. I would have LOVED to hear an early 60s John have a go at this though.
Love this song though, I think it's Paul's equivalent to John's "Twist and Shout" in terms of vocals.
John would have to change key to sing the middle part. By 69 that was out of his range. He had his hands full with Come Together if you listen to the anthology out takes.
I know that John said he could sing this better;also I'm more a fan of John than Paul. Having said that, I think Paul just shreds his throat to do this (at least on the LP). When Paul was good, he was VERY good!
This one didnt cut it. And that harmony with himself just isn't working.Don't get me wrong, back then Paul McCartney had one of the best voices on the planet! The music is the same as the final version. Except John & George, or just George did some oohs & ahhs on the last verse of the song..
It is Paul. Read the books. Every morning for a week he went into the studio before the other Beatles came and sang a new version till he got it like he wanted it to be. And that's not John harmonizing, but Paul with himself
c'mon people you gotta be able to tell it's mccartney from the screaming, that's pure paul, ladies and gents. weren't you wondering why it was so badass??? ;)
how could anyone dislike this?
de2puntos 1 week ago
Nice. I know of this version and a few others (like the Twickenham Studio soundtrack recordings, and the Beatles Anthology recording), but I love the song and wish there were more complete versions out there.
profwaggstaff 7 months ago
Funny that this sounds alot like the way Paul does this song these days.
walrus108 1 year ago
OH DARLIN
Matticus1231234141 1 year ago
@jimmyphilippillar It's Macca
dahMusicDude 1 year ago
great ... funny old beatle boys ,,, takin the piss outta not lettin' ya dowwnnn...come on!!! THE BEATLES ......RESPECT!!!!!!
bbackronym 1 year ago
As a Beatlemaniac i can say that THIS SONG IS PLAYED BY THE BEATLES no one can approach to The Beatles greatest band ever
resiev15 1 year ago
This isnt the beatles.
TopTenCrew 1 year ago
@TopTenCrew this is paul singing
lianatheamazing1 1 year ago
@TopTenCrew ur a dumbass
frusciante319 1 year ago
@frusciante319
yeah that was a pretty dumbass comment, idk why I even posted it, haha. Probably high or something.
TopTenCrew 1 year ago
@TopTenCrew hahah totally fine dude i know what u mean lol
frusciante319 1 year ago
Great song, cool posting, thanx for sharing!
icast4majors 1 year ago
great song!!!
adric137 1 year ago
John really wanted to do the vocals on this song.....it does seem like it would suit Lennon's vocal style a little more than Paul's.....
jeff98211 1 year ago
it sounds that way because it was recorded , throught the Wi\zenwherller and backtracked with a mic pinged to the open ended Vieserqueser return value,,,, But , it works
dakota6mm 1 year ago
There is something flat, or out of tune about this recording.
jaywhofan 1 year ago
I think Paul had said something llike: Hey, I can make a song like John does... and out came "do it in the road" .. alternately John made "everybody's got something to hide"
Golafsson 1 year ago
Owch. God Paul...How could you have stood more than one take of this. Your throat must me made of Iron...And I thought Twist and Shout was hard...Jesu. Jesu...Jesu..The Beatles are forever.
-Miss McCartney
ruffgar66 2 years ago
this is not alternate version, this is a simple take.
jaaf86 2 years ago
Wow Paul sounds really rough at the first chorus. I love it when his vocals morphs like that, like in Golden Slumber. To me, it sounds rather (strangely) sexy. Sigh, if I only I lived in the 60s.
cleopatraclone 2 years ago 7
en el segundo coro se cansa y tiene q cantar con falsete XD
es muy exignte esta cancion
esantibanezab 2 years ago 2
que shiiii
grancochis 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
that vocal isn't Paul's!
It doesn't sound like him at all.
Anyone agrees?
Burqua12 2 years ago
John and Paul were the greatest, musical, song writing team ever.
spacestate 2 years ago 50
what about jagger and richards ?
axl and slash
plant and page ?
grancochis 1 year ago
elton john and bernie taupin?
richard rogers and oscar hammerstein?
geddy lee, alex lifeson and neil peart?
rjciccone 1 year ago
yeahhhhh ... what about those genius ?!?!
grancochis 1 year ago
@grancochis
Jebeels and Kage
hahahaahha !!
NanenMauricio 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@grancochis
jeebles and kage ?
hahahahA!
NanenMauricio 1 year ago
@spacestate it's obvious
noidentificationable 1 year ago
@spacestate In the Beatles, especially from 1966 onwards, they wrote almost entirely seperately. John had zero input on 'Oh Darling', for example.
Mechanismomusica 5 months ago
Cool!
PearlJammer07 2 years ago
People seem to think of John as the one with the "rocker" voice, but Paul could pull it off pretty well too. I love them both, their voices are so different, but so good, and they sounded great together.
HollieKR 2 years ago 41
really? I've always thought at Paul as the "rocker"
cubs0110 2 years ago 3
@HollieKR I've never thought as either as the 'rocker' voice. They both sang so perfectly, different, and so individual.
rleary1 1 year ago
@rleary1 I guess it is hard to say what kind of voice they each had because they could sing in so many different voices or styles or whatever you want to call it, but they could definitely both pull off the "rocker" voice in their own unique ways.
HollieKR 1 year ago
@HollieKR Paul has the best rocker voice of them both in my opinion :)
dahMusicDude 1 year ago 3
@HollieKR Paul's vocals were miles ahead of John's. Songs like Helter Skelter, Oh, Darling, I've Got a Feeling, I'm Down, and Long Tall Sally blow most everything John did out of the water.
TheResidentSociopath 11 months ago 8
@TheResidentSociopath Paul's "rocker" songs are some of my favorites. He is also so much fun to watch sing.
HollieKR 11 months ago 3
@TheResidentSociopath I agree...most of the time people relate The Beatles only to Lennon, Paul is so overrated as a composer and singer...
ragamuffing 9 months ago
@ragamuffing sorry, what a meant was UNDERRATED...
my english sucks
ragamuffing 9 months ago
@ragamuffing so does mine.....and i'm english !
TheMichaelseymour 8 months ago
@HollieKR Agreed, m8!!
BadNews88 5 months ago
I agree with Rikenrocker. In 69 I don't think John would have been able to do this better than Paul, despite what he said. I would have LOVED to hear an early 60s John have a go at this though.
Love this song though, I think it's Paul's equivalent to John's "Twist and Shout" in terms of vocals.
strgazr 2 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
NADA ESPECIAL EL VIDEO
DANTEBEATLE1 2 years ago
Is it John singing here?
Marooshaz 2 years ago
no, its Paul ;)
MarthaMyDear64 2 years ago 2
John would have to change key to sing the middle part. By 69 that was out of his range. He had his hands full with Come Together if you listen to the anthology out takes.
Rikenrocker 2 years ago
John should have sang lead on this song-even though Paul does a bloody good crack at it , blimey, bloody good
teelanes2u 2 years ago
I know that John said he could sing this better;also I'm more a fan of John than Paul. Having said that, I think Paul just shreds his throat to do this (at least on the LP). When Paul was good, he was VERY good!
nick2theside 2 years ago 4
John also said 'why don't we do it in the road' was more his style than Paul's, though Macca done a good job on it.
fuckoffucunt 2 years ago 6
Yes, it was meant to be either John on harmonies throughout or on shared lead.
fuckoffucunt 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The voices is not Paul's
izkx 2 years ago
of course it is. are you joking?
berherbi 2 years ago 2
this is what is known as a rehearsal; lol; still marvelous stuff.
caesarcerf 2 years ago
MOST TALENTED MAN ALIVE
jba2323 2 years ago 6
I think this take should have been put on "Abbey Road"
djminimoto 2 years ago
is it the song only you? like this!!
turkishairline63 2 years ago
Paul's voice is so sweeet, he is adorable:)
THEtinybrat24 2 years ago 3
they had so powerful mics!
San5a 2 years ago
Paul sounds cute here!!!
zapeti1235 3 years ago 2
I love hearing alternates. I do like the final take better, but it's still neat to hear this.
BridgesGoddess 3 years ago 7
Glad he kept trying to get that "Right Vocal"
This one didnt cut it. And that harmony with himself just isn't working.Don't get me wrong, back then Paul McCartney had one of the best voices on the planet! The music is the same as the final version. Except John & George, or just George did some oohs & ahhs on the last verse of the song..
hankphelps 3 years ago 2
no doubt about it... paul macca singin.. i like the alternates they are always more raw.. long live the beatles
Moradha213 3 years ago 2
there is no doubt that this is paul i dont know why anyone would think otherwise
Courcelle56 3 years ago 4
its paul..for sure. ;)
Treadsoftly14 3 years ago 5
It is Paul. Read the books. Every morning for a week he went into the studio before the other Beatles came and sang a new version till he got it like he wanted it to be. And that's not John harmonizing, but Paul with himself
RonMazasco 3 years ago 4
how is this not paul?
sdsusdsusdsu 3 years ago
Absolutely Paul. He is altering his voice to get a more bluesy. different sound. He does it all of the time.
gbmaccafan 3 years ago 7
c'mon people you gotta be able to tell it's mccartney from the screaming, that's pure paul, ladies and gents. weren't you wondering why it was so badass??? ;)
nthom15 3 years ago 10
Exactly!!!. It is clearly him. And he sounds great.
Crisstti 3 years ago 5
I agree, Paul's voice is unmistakeable....so bluesy and kool
rhondaluvshermusic 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no way this is paul
ManMulcahey 3 years ago
This is, without a doubt, Paul McCartney. I've heard this demo before, along with others where he sings in a similar voice.
ResidentSociopath 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nice try...but not even close!~!!!
LeahJeanN 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It Is NOT Paul
thefirststeps 3 years ago
AND!!! you can hear john harmonizing with paul in the last verse!!! Pleaseee def beatles
mrkie10 3 years ago
of course its paul you idiot
WhoKilledCallo 3 years ago
defintly the Beatles just from the sound alone of the music, its beatles,and its defintly paul from the vocals. Some sort of outake
mrkie10 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Not Paul....maybe a guy named Paul....but definitely not Macca.
AyingTorrs 3 years ago
Yeah, It doesn't seem Paul, but I think the speed is not right so you can't hear his voice right.
Kiquegil 3 years ago
yes it is paul mccartney, its so obvious.
WhoKilledCallo 3 years ago
If I didnt know any better , this sounds like that band THIRD FLOOR you know they did NO REPLY on here..nice ...I may be wrong,keepim coming
barlo33 4 years ago
that is paul, with no doubt, it is paul... definately paul... beatles paul....
brodzthehunter 3 years ago 3
thank you, sir or madam. wonderful!
ringu 4 years ago