Lila Rose Lays Out the Case Against Planned Parenthood on "The Factor"

[joejoejoe54321]

Good job, Lila. My mom had me, and we love each other. God bless you! :D

[Savipalooza]

Stop trying to control the lives of others against their will.

[AtheistTower]

@Savipalooza

You just defined what abortion does. Have you ever seen an unborn willingly go towards the implement that ends his/her life? No.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

It would be very difficult to argue that an unborn child has a conscious will. And even if you could, taking its life would not be the same as controlling its life by forcing it to deal with undesired circumstances (which would cause it to suffer). If it's dead, it can't suffer.

[AtheistTower]

@Savipalooza

I don't believe you can define a human on a subjective definition like that; we afford human rights and protections tho those who are in such a state; those under a coma are mentally incapable of a conscious will - perhaps indefinitely - yet are considered human. Giving one life gives them the possibility of taking control of their own - the mother herself can let such responsibility onto someone else without the unborn being punished. I do support abortion in rape - but that's it.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

The fact that certain actions cause people to suffer is not based on the whims of some individual. It's an objective truth. The only thing that should matter when determining whether it's a good idea to behave a certain way is whether the behavior in question causes people to suffer. If it does not cause suffering, why object to it? The terms we use to describe what people are at various stages (fetus, baby, human, glob of goo, etc.) are irrelevant.

[AtheistTower]

@Savipalooza

There is plenty of evidence that women suffer psychological after undergoing an abortion procedure. Have you considered that within the equation? There is actually no evidence that a women suffers ultimately more by going through with the pregnancy. The unborn suffers, in fact it feels significant amounts of pain over the whole procedure - if you think the unborn is merely a glob I recommend you update your biological ignorance, we're not in the mid 20th century anymore.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

Search "fetal pain" on Google Scholar to find scholarly articles showing that there's no indication of fetuses suffering and experiencing pain until at least the 26th week of gestation. Even anti-abortion website "Abortion No" admits that only 1% of abortions take place that late. But we can't assume the procedure would cause pain even in those instances without evidence. If the woman suffers, it is because others have made her feel guilty by convincing her that abortion is wrong.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

The reason for getting an abortion is usually that the woman is unable or unwilling to raise a child. There's no sense in forcing an unwilling or unable mother to raise a child, or overburdening the orphanages and foster homes to accommodate the child. Obviously the woman and the child would suffer if she was forced to give birth to the child.

"Glob of goo" is just one of the terms I've heard people use. I told you I don't care what people call it, since semantics are irrelevant.

[AtheistTower]

@Savipalooza

If your proposed reasons are why abortion predominantly happens, then that doesn't still justify abortion. Nobodies proposing she take care of her child, that's what adoption is for. There are plenty of willing couples out there who wish to adopt, if it weren't for such strict adoption laws, more would do so more often too. Death is not justified for someone's else's inabilities. Semantics do matter, because the very law and definition of a human being depends on them.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

The law depends on arbitrary definitions and labels (semantics), so it's retarded as far as I'm concerned. Forget about death. Stop focusing on things that don't matter. Worry only about whether an action is an independent cause of suffering. According to the scholarly articles I've seen, the fetus does not suffer from an abortion. However, both the child and the mother will suffer if the woman gives birth, evidenced by the fact that she's unwilling and/or unable to raise the child

[AtheistTower]

@Savipalooza

How can you suggest that the fetus doesn't suffer? It's life being taken from it against it's will is inhumane in and of itself. I agree that the law is pretty ambiguous and ultimately irrelevant on personal views. I don't agree that the mother and child will suffer - many women who considered abortions ended up having the child and were ultimately glad they did so. I don't many individuals who would reject a chance at life compared to no life at all.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

According to the scholarly articles I've seen, based on the latest medical research, there's no indication of fetal pain. Also, the fetus doesn't appear to have a conscious will. Even if it did, it's dead once the abortion is complete; it's no longer around to suffer from its own death. Quick summary: It doesn't suffer while dying, and it doesn't suffer after it's dead. So its "will" is irrelevant. If you think it's inhumane to take life against its will, you'd better be a vegan.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

If some women who considered abortions ended up having the kid and feeling happy about the decision, then good for them. Who cares? That doesn't say anything about who suffers and what causes it. You'd better agree that the mother and child are more likely (and in some cases, certain) to suffer as a direct result of NOT having an abortion, because that's reality. Forcing an unwilling or unable person to raise a child is bad for the parent and the child.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

There's not much else I can say at this point. You seem to believe in some sort of religion-inspired objective morality, despite your user name. "Right and wrong" are meaningless abstractions. Any skeptic should beware of these terms. They only obscure the truth about the actions and behaviors in question (in this case, abortion). For the purpose of these types of discussions, I place actions in one of two categories: things that cause suffering and things that don't.

[AtheistTower]

@Savipalooza

Do you consider depriving a human being, one that is healthy and willing to live of life? If your answer is no, then your position is inconsistent and even 'wrong' in regards to your own loosely subjective definition of morality - a definition very few people adhere too. If you define it by suffering, what causes more suffering - death or birth?

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

(post 1 of 4) I don't have my own definition of morality; I don't even believe in morality. There are simply behaviors I object to (behaviors that cause suffering) and those I do not object to (those which do not cause suffering). I do not consider behaviors that fall into the first category "wrong/immoral," and I do not consider behaviors that fall into the second category "right/moral." I simply object to or approve of certain actions, based solely on whether they cause suffering

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

The deprivation of life does not necessarily cause suffering. It's possible for someone to die instantly and painlessly without fear or anticipation of his death beforehand, while leaving no friends or family behind. In a scenario like this, his death causes no one to suffer. Abortion is actually very similar to this. The fetus developed no personal bonds or friendships with anyone. It undergoes a painless death (according to medical research) and no one mourns its loss.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

When a woman gets an abortion, it's probably because she's either unwilling or unable to have the child. Under these circumstances, it's safe to say that the woman and the child will suffer more from the inevitable disharmony the birth would cause than they would if she had the abortion. In these instances, birth causes more suffering than death. As I said previously, suffering is not inherent in death. They are two separate things, often (not always) accompanying one another.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

(post 4/4) What's the point of objecting to an action that does not cause suffering? It only causes the loss of life (which is NOT synonymous with suffering). Washing one's hands causes loss of life too, but most people seem fine with it. I think the only acceptable reason to object to anything is if it causes someone to suffer. If it doesn't, then what are you really objecting to? You're just following arbitrary rules of conduct that are not based on the alleviation of suffering.

[AtheistTower]

@Savipalooza

Try and get your reply into one or two posts. A recent paper by Fabrizi et al. (2011), indicates that pain can be felt specifically before birth, and non-specifically before that point - so you're wrong by modern science. Abortion causes all kinds of suffering, you mean to say the 20 million less females in China is a good thing or something? It causes unprecedented social problems. Have you actually talked to an abortion 'survivor', because many of them are glad they're alive.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

That abstract from ScienceDirect helped prove my point that nearly all abortions are pain-free. It said that nociception (which triggers pain) emerges between 35-37 weeks gestation. It also says that touch and noxious lances of the infant's heel evoke nonspecific neuronal bursts between 28-45 weeks gestation. However, only 1.4% of abortions take place after 21 weeks. This means that the overwhelming majority (around 97-99%) of abortions do not cause suffering.

[AtheistTower]

@Savipalooza

So on your basis you would stand up to defend that 1.4% which translates to thousands? The absence of being given the opportunity to have life could in itself be classified as suffering - it is afterall depriving someone of life.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

I didn't think I'd need to explain this... I still object to the few cases where the pregnancy is aborted while the fetus can feel pain (assuming the procedure even causes pain in the first place). This means I object to perhaps less than 1% of abortions. This doesn't mean we should make the rest of them illegal.

Not being allowed to live cannot be classified as suffering unless the means of death is either physically or psychologically painful. Once you're dead, you can't suffer.

[AtheistTower]

@Savipalooza

"perhaps less than 1% of abortions."

If you're talking about abortions globally it's a great deal more than 1%, particularly in developing nations which are the biggest aborters.

"Not being allowed to live cannot be classified as suffering unless the means of death is either physically or psychologically painful."

That's a dangerous view, it supports the right for people to assist the suicide of others. I reject your position; it's naive and black & white.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

It doesn't support anything. It only states the fact that one cannot suffer from a painless death. One's desire to live is irrelevant if they die before realizing they're being killed. A death caused by abortion cannot cause suffering unless two conditions are met: 1. The abortion must take place after the fetus can feel pain, and 2. The procedure itself must cause pain to those who can feel it. In these rare instances, I object. I'm fine with the rest, and you should be too.

[AtheistTower]

@Savipalooza

"One's desire to live is irrelevant"

Why? You're reducing the value of life to nothing by basing the value of life on such conditions. And again, you're merely defining suffering as a purely physical experience, which isn't entirely accurate. Although I bought this up before - you ignore the fact that women who undergo an abortion still experience negative psychological outcomes, in fact you'll find very few who are so hardened that they feel nothing after an abortion.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

Where did you get the idea that life has an inherent value or sanctity? Seems more of a religious idea than one a skeptic/atheist would hold. I specifically mentioned psychological/emotional suffering two posts before this one; I'm not limiting suffering to only a physical experience. And I already told you why women who feel upset/guilty after an abortion feel that way. It's because of the social stigma surrounding the procedure. There's no reason for them to feel upset.

[AtheistTower]

@Savipalooza

Our view laws and social perspectives are based on the premise that human life has value and should be protected, you can't ignore that. You told me why you think women feel that way without actually substantiating such a stance - as I said before, women feel emotional pain even when strongly supported and told that they've nothing wrong - so you can't blame society and use it as a scapegoat to somehow consolidate your position, it's invalid.

[Savipalooza]

@AtheistTower

The bottom line is that the quality of life for the woman and the child would almost certainly decline if the child is born. If she gets an abortion, her quality of life will remain high, and the fetus' quality of life is nonexistent. Plus, the fetus didn't have to suffer.

It seems like you're saying that people don't get the idea that human life should be preserved from external sources; it's more of a gut feeling or part of our nature. Either way, it's not grounded in reality.

[Savipalooza]

I can understand requiring the parents' consent if the patient is a minor (because the girl obviously needs their guidance if she's getting knocked up at an early age). But there's no need to get the police involved in the case of two people having consensual sex.

Also, I'd totally bang that chick.

[patriciacarrasco]

Lila ure a true hero and doing God's work..dont let anybody bring u down! God bless!

[patriciacarrasco]

Planned Parenthood are people who kill babies for a living...its not a surprise to me that they also break the law and dont care about girls being raped and abused...they dont care about doing whats right

[ahachie]

It is people like Lila Rose, which continue the backwards progression of the United States of America.

[CowieMooCowxo87]

@ahachie how the fuck is it her? it's the fault of the assholes who worked there and their negligence! thanks to those people, they put every other planned parenthood at risk!

[Bluebelle9289]

She - Lila Rose - is one ugly woman both inside and out.

[zathen]

@Bluebelle9289 You got a whacked out sense about the concept of beauty.

[revroyolsen]

Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood:

"The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race

(Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)

[khammock9]

@revroyolsen Kill it quickly and with as little pain as possible or let it starve to death. I would rather be killed quickly, most people would. And dont suggest giving the kid to an orphanage, because the system was even worse back then. It was not acceptable to adopt back then.

[mrekbass]

You're not mature enough to understand that this is an anomaly, that the exception proves the rule. Any organization requires oversight. The fact that violations were found and PP has corrected them tells us that the system is working. For conservatives to suggest that these infractions, which are a less than a single digit % of the events and that PP will have in a day, is classic conservative extremism. Embrace the liberties that God gave you. Stop trying to take them away from others!

[LiveActionFilms]

@mrekbass Planned Parenthood has corrected their violations? They have yet to ever correct this:

Search: Wisconsin Planned Parenthood Ignores Sexual Abuse Case

And Search: Wisconsin Planned Parenthood CEO Caught in Lie

[mrekbass]

@LiveActionFilms

Wow! PP fires employees but you don't see that as a correction.

Sadly, you are not aware that this specific PP by being inspected and placed on probation (your words) they will be required by law to fix these violations in order to stay open. This by definition constitutes a correction. You could care less about other people or their civil rights. You are too narrowly focused on your baby killing fantasy to see straight. As you mature you wont view things so narrowly.

[LiveActionFilms]

@mrekbass Before embarrassing yourself further, please watch the two videos that we provided above. Planned Parenthood did not address this situation with corrective action or fire this employee. Please get the facts before sharing your points based on incorrect information.

[LiveActionFilms]

@LiveActionFilms We have shown Planned Parenthood failing to properly handle child sexual abuse many times. Their Birmingham, Alabama clinic is the one that was placed on probation following state Health Dept. investigation. The links I showed you above relate to Milwaukee, WI Planned Parenthood. 2 different clinics.

[Bluebelle9289]

@LiveActionFilms

Take your own advice. None of your facts are straight. You spew nothing but lies. You should be ashamed of yourself.

[zathen]

@Bluebelle9289 Lets seeeee. Who should I trust... people who support the murder of the innocent, orrrrrrrrrr people who want to preserve and give justice to all life. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm. Who should I trust. Tell me, please! I'm in a serious dilemma over here! Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!

[AtheistTower]

@mrekbass

I don't care what percentage of care PP does is abortion, the fact is, it's a percentage and not a percentage that's made for rape victims either. A percentage is meaningless when you actually take into account how such percentage is measured. PP centres positively correlate with higher abortion rates for all reasons and all ages.

[mrekbass]

@AtheistTower ""PP centres positively correlate with higher abortion rates for all reasons and all ages.""

Reference that please! As you know this to be a fact, and you state the facts without the actual numbers or references for said numbers, it’s to be expected that anyone reading this post would want to read your sources.

Any event that so strongly affects all ages and for all reasons should be very easy to reference. We'll accept any statistics from credible news sources or agencies.

[mrekbass]

@AtheistTower Aside from the act that you can't reference such an over blown statement, you have confused the difference between the % of PP's budget being spent on abortions compared to other health services provided for clients and the % of abortions given when PP patients are compared to non PP patients. Confusion over simple matters such as these are the purview of the radical right. Additionally, the radical right simply lies about PP’s budget to fool their intellectually lazy constituents.

[mrekbass]

It's interesting that she posts this video as if it is something to be proud of. The recording was obviously edited. You can hear the cut. Additionally, the PP employee didn't say anything damning. The employee said "there is nothing we can do about that." How does anyone get from that comment to somehow believing the PP employee was condoning or helping cover up her age? Only a truly shallow person would view this as damning of PP.

[LiveActionFilms]

@mrekbass The Alabama department of health after its own investigation of this Planned Parenthood clinic placed it on probation after finding 9 health violations including failure to follow the state's parental consent laws.

[IHeartNivo]

She is as delusional as you are sweetheart. Now run along back to your kitchen. Susan B. Anthony is rolling around in her grave right now.

[IHeartNivo]

This young gender traitor has no idea the suffering she is about to unleash. Abortions are legal, but i guess to Miss. Rose she herself has NO regard for the law. When this "fight" is over what is your next move? are you going to rally for women to jump back into the dark ages? Oh wait I know! you are going to take care off all those unwanted kids that are now being born financially and emotionally and give them all good homes. Am I right? kick rocks.

[XxHarmonicNightsxX]

@IHeartNivo Cut the BS. No one is as anti-woman as pro-choicers.Not everyone is so sheepish and mindless as to think that if the govt allows it, then it's perfectly just & moral.The govt has allowed people to own slaves.The laws currently cater to deadbeat women. As a woman, I expect to be treated like a responsible adult...but thats not how our government or pro-choicers view women. They instead view women as helpless children who are incapable of undrestanding the consequences of their actions

[ahiltz20]

Of course Fox News is the only news station with Lila Rose on it. They are the only station that would allow that filth on their network.

[LiveActionFilms]

@ahiltz20 Lila has been on CNN and CNN even did a documentary about Lila Rose and Live Action. Our work has been covered by ABC, CBS, and NBC affiliates around the country.

[tismeinaz]

This is BS and a lie. Lila Rose is a liar and a hypocrite. She cuts and pastes video just like OKeefe and Breitbart and then expects to look righteous. She uses God like a hammer to push her agenda. But God does't like like liars and hypocrites and some day she will get her own comeuppance.

[OwO19]

Stupid bitch....

[niradg]

thank you for making me realize what a compassionate and moral organization Planned Parenthood is. Patient confidentiality and privacy is of the utmost importance, regardless of his or her age. I think I will donate to PP today.

[Scottiepoo5612]

What a piece of shit! I LOVE the way Fox says.."Planned Parenthood ABORTION CLINICS"???? Folks...don't fall for these lies...they are NOT abortion clinics...treu..they can counsil....but Planned parenthood is anything BUT an abortion Clinic...........God...how can people be SOOOO STUPID!

[LiveActionFilms]

@Scottiepoo5612 Fact: Planned Parenthood did 324,000 abortions according to their latest annual report. This makes them the largest abortion chain in the United States.

[MrBsmith8484]

@LiveActionFilms Fact: Abortion accounts for only 3% of all services Planned Parenthood provides.

[LiveActionFilms]

@MrBsmith8484 Fact: Planned Parenthood Performed 134 Abortions for Every Adoption Referral

Their full numbers for 2008 were: * 324,008 Abortions of Preborn Humans * 2,405 Adoption Referrals (Planned Parenthood does not do adoptions themselves)

Fact: 36.7% of Planned Parenthood’s “Health Center Income” is from Abortions

[MrBsmith8484]

@LiveActionFilms Regardless of how much revenue is garnered by abortions, (which by the way is a surgical procedure and thus very costly,) they still comprise only a fraction of all the services they provide. Additionally, maybe the high cost will act as a deterrent for some.

Fact: Planned Parenthood's comprehensive contraception and sexual education services helped prevent roughly 595,000 unintended pregnancies in 2008.

[MrBsmith8484]

@LiveActionFilms Regardless of how much revenue is garnered by abortions, (which by the way is a surgical procedure and thus very costly,) they still comprise only a fraction of all the services they provide. Additionally, maybe the high cost will act as a deterrent for some.

Fact: Planned Parenthood's comprehensive contraception and sexual education services helped prevent roughly 595,000 unintended pregnancies in 2008.

[LiveActionFilms]

@MrBsmith8484 That isn't a "fact" it is a claim. Do you know the difference? New York has free birth control and has had it for year yet has one of the highest abortion rates. The states where Planned Parenthood works most in have the highest abortion rates...like California, Deleware and NY. The real world data doesn't backup that having PP = low abortion rate.

[MrBsmith8484]

@LiveActionFilms I am completely aware of the difference between a fact and a claim. And I will concede that my statement, though a reliable estimate, is an assertion. However, some of the claims you present as fact on your website are -at best- an assertion, and at worst scary and dangerous propagandized lies. Take for example the following: "The pill, the patch, IUDs, and Depo-Provera shots: every single one of these methods is extremely harmful to women," and "cause infertility."

Data?

[LiveActionFilms]

@MrBsmith8484 First that isn't a statement of Live Action as an organization but the opinion of a guest blogger. That said, you can read on cancer.gov "Some studies have shown an increased risk of breast cancer in women taking oral contraceptives" "Oral contraceptive use has been shown in multiple studies to decrease the risk of ovarian and endometrial cancer" "Oral contraceptives have been shown to increase the risk of cervical cancer" So they can be dangerous.

[LiveActionFilms]

@MrBsmith8484 "The return of fertility for women who discontinue oral contraceptives takes longer as compared with women who discontinue other methods of contraception." Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. from NIH.gov .... and see "Reproductive factors and oral contraceptive use at a young age influence the risk of uterine leiomyomata among premenopausal women." Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health

[BoredIslandGirl]

@LiveActionFilms I know you must be swamped with questions but I would like an answer if it's possible. Whatever your standpoint, abortion has been in almost every society in almost every time through the use, for example of plants. Given this, can you point me to any specific quotes in the bible which talk about abortion? There are so many laws in the bible but I can't seem to pinpoint termination of pregnancy. Thank you in advance.

[CorreggiosMagdalena]

Thank you, Lila Rose and thank you, Laura as well for exposing Planned Parenthood.

[prezobummer]

gahd shes beautiful

[slightlygrouchy]

Where is Fox' "fair and balanced" approach? They have two guests arguing the same side. But not only that: whilst Rose makes accusations against which PP can't defend itself, Tweedledum in the suit gives personal opinions and seems the complete opposite of objective and professional. Also, the bloke condemns PP without even having investigated it. Good Lord.

[jmatassa]

LILA ROSE IS AWESOME!!! WE NEED MORE PEOPLE LIKE HER TO ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING TO STOP THESE CLINICS!!!

[motorniczy7777]

Poland supports you 

[SexySadie98506]

You have to wonder about those edits, don't you? Too bad Lila is losing her looks.

[witclip]

There seems to be alot of fraud in this industry. HIPPA, used in Planned Parenthood and county health departments, does not allow people with Chlamydia and pregnancies who give false information to be accurately tracked. Thus, the exact std and preg. rates are not accurate, and it opens the door for organizations to fraudulently inflate numbers. Meaning, more numbers mean more federal money.

[Roboboogey1990]

"Let all babies be born, and drown the ones we don't like." - G K Chesterton

[AloofMedia]

@Robo: I'm assuming you realize that GK was using one of his favorite literary devices with that statement. Please tell me that you're not taking him literally. And if you're not, forgive me for this post, but you never know what type of person you're going to run into in here.......

[Roboboogey1990]

No, I'm not taking it literally! :P Though I half expected someone to say, "OMG thats so cruel" or something.

[drift990]

thats fucking hilarious.

[steubiefom]

This girl is the example of a real hero. It's exciting to think that people like her are out there making a stand for justice.

[whatevalife6]

What I want to know is, where's MSN? CNN? CBS? Why is the only station willing to report this FOX? The liberal media is the only thing holding this flood back!! And that makes me sooo angry.

I applaud that attorney general though. If I'm not mistaken, he is the one of the few people who have prosecuted PP since Roe v. Wade.

[OwO19]

@whatevalife6 You obviously have not done your research? The reason the liberal media probably isn't reporting this the same way Fox News does is because it's inaccurate. Her videos are shams....

[tismeinaz]

@whatevalife6 because MSN, CNN and CBS know hacked film when they see it and refuse to give a platform to a liar and hypocrite.

[whatevalife6]

Pharaoh Obama: Let Our People Grow!

[icimblind]

Abortion kills. Only a lunatic would argue against this. That's the goal of abortion, to terminate and kill. Who would say it is alright for a woman to take part of her body and beat someone to death? Only a lunatic!

[lena42frances]

If you don't know... women CANNOT do whatever they want with their body. It is against the law to do drugs, or take your own life. So explain why it is okay to take another... and no its not just a blob of tissue. According to scientific law, there is no period of non-life. At conception our unique genetic makeup was created. One fact that cannot be denied is that every person existed and was living at that intricate stage in development. The evidence is there.

[Fleefles]

I wonder...if a woman has a baby and lives somewhere where she cannot buy formula (say a tribe somewhere in a jungle) and there are no other lactating women around, does she have the right to refuse to allow the baby to breast-feed just because she doesn't want it anymore? Or should she be forced to let the baby feed against her will?

According to pro-choice logic, since a woman has full rights over her body, letting the baby starve would be morally okay. :<

[mfx2010]

First off, Fox News edited down the clip to show what they wanted. 2) Any woman--any human--has the right to do with their body what they want. What next are pro-lifers going to rally to not allow gays to have sex because it won't make a baby? I think one of the most hypocritical things is that this decoy pretends to be pregnant by a 31 year old and everyone makes a big deal about her being "raped." Ok, let her get an abortion since she was raped and she shouldn't be forced to keep the baby.

[Huntmaster555]

technically when the baby is conceived, it has its own DNA so it is not apart of the mother although it lives off of and inside of her. the mother does not have the right to kill another human being, and since a fetus' has DNA, its no longer up to them wether the baby lives or dies. its up to only god himself...

[greghannibal]

God bless you Lila! Finally someone brave enough to take on those butchers!

[StewartLucrative]

I wanna get her pregnant

[mrseats]

LUNATICS!!!!!!!

[JERice7]

God bless, Lila! And God bless Live Action!

[violetlightening15]

Lila is amazing!

She is so brave and eloquent!!!

[naomiscooldad]

Nice. Someone is finally doing something about it.

[KrestaInTheAfternoon]

Would Dred Scott have been in favor of Roe v. Wade?

Scott v. Sandford...... 7-2 vote Dred Scott is property of his owner.

Roe v. Wade.............. 7-2 vote A developing human is property of its mother.

The Supreme Court eventually got it right but only after millions of blacks were denied the right of freedom. We are confident that Roe will be overturned, but how long? Let your voice be heard!

[KrestaInTheAfternoon]

As long as we keep talking about the issue of abortion, it is certain that it will eventually be made illegal once more. That's the beauty of natural law, you can only disregard it for so long before the truth becomes undeniably clear. Just like in the fight against slavery, the Supreme Court ruled that humans are not equal. That some humans have more inalienable rights than others. That some humans can impose their will on others. Women don't own the human in their womb.

[raytibbitts]

something's wrong with the counter

[ryansorba]

Great work Lila! Human life begins at conception, when an individual, irreplacable human being is formed. From then on he or she will never change kinds, that is, undergo a substantial change, but rather, he or she will change by way of maturation, according to a self-integrating pattern, because of what he or she already is, a living human being! - and I learned that from Pro-Life 101!

[LifeReport]

Even pro-choice people should be horrified by what's going on at Planned Parenthood. There is no question that the medical licenses for every clinic caught protecting rapists should be revoked. Their government funding should be given to somebody else that will follow the law.

[culred]

i'm totally pro-choice, but really it shouldn't matter what you are, they're breaking the law!!!! i'm pro-choice, not pro-statutory rape!

[jewelofbeauty]

That's great to know, but did you also know that Planned Parenthood was originally started as Margaret Sanger's Negro Project to "get rid of" black people? Planned Parenthood is still used for that even today. Lila is the one that exposed it.

[icimblind]

The greatest fear of Planned Parenthood is now coming true, the reality of the evil they do is being exposed. I feel like LiveActionFilms has put a crack in the PP damn and all their filthy lies are going to spill forth. If it takes years to make this crack larger don't worry about it. God and the unborn are very happy it is there!!

Nice job L.A.Films!

$350 milion in Federal Tax Money, & over $900 mil in Profit Blood Money annually for Legal Homocides. Shame on you Planned Parenthood!!!

[rooftopeagle]

I bet that Planned Parenthood is working overtime to cover their tracks now....

[jezuzfreek777]

great job exposing those murderers for what they are.

[aibdescalzo]

Thank you, Lila, for defending the unborn child

I wish you could be my girlfriend, you are so pretty. :)

[AntiBarbie127]

Why does she never go on CNN or MSNBC or a more liberal station to show her views? They need the change of heart.

[LiveActionFilms]

Live Action is very open to going on those stations although we have not been invited to-date.

[GoodnessGlaciers]

you know why!! liberals.....its a shame. complete shame.

[jamesdragonforce]

@AntiBarbie127 They most likely wouldn't be considering the fact that they're liberal.

[jakedevon]

It is about time that someone in authority started looking into this.

[DavidCasper]

Incredible. Just incredible. Not only is this travesty happening in Birmingham, it's happening all across the nation! Even pro-abortion activists have to be ashamed or enraged at the sheer maliciousness and underhandedness of the very institutions they're trying to protect.

[JohnJ2427]

They should be, but they're not. Instead they will blame it all on conservatives for drawing attention to the problem.