Nassim Haramein - Sacred Geometry & Unified Fields - FULL VERSION

[cristobal2012]

Absolutely fascinating!!! We've been lied to for so loooong it makes me throw up. Can you guys imagine all the great things we could do if we use renewable energy? It would be colossal!

[jeigo]

im enjoying this video and can relate to his story to what i have experienced on multi levels :D

[qualisarx]

I would have to agree with almost everything that was said. If him and tesla were merged space travel would become ordinary for the human reace

[SkandranonOwens]

im just an average youtube commentor and i really like the ideas this man puts forth. his assumptions on ascension seem a bit far fetched but he seems to be right about most other things.

[themillwrightufo]

He deserves the nobel peace prize or something....



[gottagoat]

just imagine if we had a government that embraced learning the wonders of the univerce that were hormoous and free, instead of greedy warmongers who care not of our beautiful blue planet or the human race

[zeinak100]

Very nice, inspiring lecture.

[Rozmatronicles]

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORING, immago play Skyrim

[EleanorHandcart]

No, I'm not hating or trolling, I'm asking a question and genuinely open to answers. Does anyone have any scientific justification for accepting any of Nassim's ideas as being physics, other than because they like the sound of them?

My guess was that his fans would avoid responding about the science and/or take offense at the question, because there are no reasons, but his fans don't want to think that. I'm open to being shown that I'm wrong.

[BethWithes]

@EleanorHandcart Lady, don't have anything else to do in life but comment on a video that you don't even like??? Look at all the time you've spent here....please, move along, it's a big world....go find something you can understand and comment there.

[dedballoonz]

I'm struggling to watch more than ten minutes of this. It's kinda like a train wreck and I cant look away :/

[detached]

@dedballoonz

Which is why you and all the other haters on here don't understand what is being presented. Close mindedness tends to limit your exposure to information.

[tg1w]

@dedballoonz Tastes, isn't it. I found it particularly enjoying, the whole 1h 30 min :)

[dorothy007kulik]

Well then send a letter to the resonance project. I'm not interested.

[EleanorHandcart]

@dorothy007kulik OK, fair enough. I didn't actually believe you were interested.

I suspect nobody who supports him cares in the slightest whether or not his claims have any substance. That's kind of my point.

[dorothy007kulik]

Lady, if you cannot understand that I have provided evidence that I understand what he is talking about, then there is no sense in pursuing this conversation. The reason I support his ideas is because I understand them. Clearly you don't and you don't want to. You might want to consider why you don't want to.

[EleanorHandcart]

@dorothy007kulik No, I understand them very well. I could give you hundreds of examples of mistakes, misunderstandings, meaningless or empty claims and outright falsehoods in this talk. It's very easy. If I didn't understand it then I wouldn't be able to do that.

[dorothy007kulik]

Yes. Because I have an education in astrophysics and I happen to know he is right on spot.

[EleanorHandcart]

@dorothy007kulik that's not a reason supporting his ideas, that's a claim about yourself. Do you have a reason?

[BethWithes]

@EleanorHandcart Why don't you petition the American Institute of Physics, which gave Nassim an award for his work? Here you go, maybe you can educate them: theresonanceproject (dot) org/research/scientific

[dorothy007kulik]

Thank you, Eleanor Handcart, for sharing your double digit IQ with us.

[EleanorHandcart]

@dorothy007kulik My pleasure. And do you, Dorothy, have a single reason to take this man's scientific claims seriously other than because you like the sound of them?

Does anyone?

Isn't it a good question?

[EleanorHandcart]

It's a case of "I like the sound of this, and I have the right to believe it's real science if I want". Do you have a single other reason for accepting it? I bet you don't.

You're selling yourself off very cheap if that's all it takes.

Look a little deeper than the charisma and the rhetoric. Do you really want to believe this stuff so much that you won't question it, or take any interest in anyone else questioning it?

This is precisely what ALL frauds rely on.

[GeoffTheGiraff]

@EleanorHandcart fraud? He's presenting ideas that are new and information that most people don't take the time to stop and think about... and you're burning him at the stake.

[EleanorHandcart]

@GeoffTheGiraff I'm not burning him at the stake, Geoff! I'm saying that the only reason people have this idea that he is making revolutionary contributions to science is because they like the sound of his stories and they want to believe them. I'm saying they're empty of scientific content.

If I'm wrong, his fans will easily be able to present valid scientific evidence and reasoning to support his ideas. Do you have any?

If I'm right, then they won't. They'll just be outraged.

[blackyblackblack505]

@EleanorHandcart Your satire almost made me chuckle. What's a fraud if he chooses to question the "hard" and "undeniable" facts, Perhaps Nassim is more of philosopher than an astrologist, but how many professionals do you know of that question what they're taught by the corporate sponsored educational industrial complex? Repeat after me, "2+2=5"- Can you prove it's not?

[EleanorHandcart]

@blackyblackblack505 of course I can prove it's not. I take two things, add another two things, and see if there are five. There aren't.

Someone is a scientific fraud if they claim to be presenting scientific fact when they are not, or if they pretend to have a scientific insight that they don't have.

Some people don't care whether or not he's a fake, they just like his shows. That's ok. If you don't care, you don't care.

[blackyblackblack505]

@EleanorHandcart And there you are wrong. Numbers are representatives: A sequence of numbers 1 2 3, I can change the definitions 1 3 2 so that three is less than two, so 1+1=3. You can't find a number one out in real life, can you? That's what Nassim is trying to prove, that there is no empirical evidence of what the "experts" claim, it's all in their minds. Nassim is not displaying scientific facts, he's questioning the established mental models, emphasis on "mental".

[EleanorHandcart]

@blackyblackblack505 You can say anything if you just make words mean something they don't mean. You're in a pretty little dream-world that I can't argue with :)

If you want to offer three dollars in return for a dollar and a dollar, you'll find plenty of willing takers. Emphasis on "mental" indeed.

This video is full of false claims. The first two minutes are full of claims about himself and his contribution to physics. They're fake.

[EleanorHandcart]

@blackyblackblack505 astrology? no thanks.

If it makes you happy to think of me in shackles then be my guest :) It's a bit demeaning. Besides, I've got mountains to roam out here, and the vastness of the universe to contemplate in my own sweet way.

Thanks for your opinions, but I was really looking to see if anyone would be prepared to stand up and say they accept Nassim's ideas from a scientific basis.

[blackyblackblack505]

@EleanorHandcart Ah, of course, no astrology? I guess that's why you don't understand science: I'll go ahead and inform you- science is a means for defining the world using logic and empirical evidence. Key words: defining (representative), Logic (philosophy) and empirical (evidence, meaning no mental creations). Meditate on that for a while, it's good for the mind.

[EleanorHandcart]

@blackyblackblack505 whatever you say...

[blackyblackblack505]

@EleanorHandcart And so the debating ends. Oh how the hard-minded have fallen!

[EleanorHandcart]

@blackyblackblack505 the debating ended some time ago, my dear :)

[blackyblackblack505]

@EleanorHandcart Technically the debating never started.

[blackyblackblack505]

@EleanorHandcart He can't be called a fraud, because he doesn't claim to be a "doctor" or a know-it-all "expert". He's just a guy that likes to read, you and I also like to read.

[wheelori814]

this guy is friggen FABULOUS!!! wish i had him as a teacher in school, but glad i found him now!

[EleanorHandcart]

Thank you Nassim for pretending to be an authority, and for standing up and saying what we want to hear instead of encouraging us to learn anything! And for using big words that sound like science, we like that!

Now everyone repeat after me, "I'm no scientist, but my prejudices* tell me that he's really onto something." Woo! Yay Nassim!

(*I know we prefer the word intuitions, but let's be honest...)

[Vernhicular]

@EleanorHandcart Who the fuck are you and what the hell are you on about? "pretending to be an authority"? I watched the entire video and never gleaned that from it. Wheres a video of you from the Nexus Conference with your theories? Did you only create an account to troll about?

[EleanorHandcart]

@Vernhicular As I said, if you'd rather react defensively than express any curiosity as to why someone might think this is fake, then you're selling yourself off very cheap. Let me know if you'd like to have a conversation instead.

What I'd really like to know is: do you have a single reason to take his scientific claims seriously other than because you like the sound of them?

[seagertblack]

@EleanorHandcart = Troll

[tg1w]

@EleanorHandcart His whole life seems to have been about learning, hence I'm not sure where you get that discouragement from. A different perspective on things, a different mentality with respect to simplifying assumptions and a creative personality should certainly be traits of a good scientist, shouldn't they?

[EleanorHandcart]

@tg1w Creativity and new perspectives are traits of a good scientist, yes. But they're also traits of a story-teller, or of a rhetoritician, or of a cult-leader, or of a snake-oil seller. Can you say what tells you this is science, and not just someone telling silly stories that some people like to believe?

[tg1w]

@EleanorHandcart Hi Eleanor. What tells me this is science is his way of working from fundamental knowledge and state-of-the-art data towards novel conclusions. I am not a physicist hence, now I can only express the fact I enjoyed his story (by the way, we can probably agree that it's also important for a scientist to have the skills of present his work, especially to a lay audience as it happened at that Nexus conference).

Could you point towards errors in his data/reasoning?

[EleanorHandcart]

@tg1w I agree that it's important for scientists (and all the other types I mentioned!) to be able to present their work well. Yes, I can point to hundreds and hundreds of errors and misunderstandings and misuse of basic scientific concepts here, and elsewhere. So I'd say that his way of arriving at conclusions and making it appear convincing (to some people, always non-physicists) is deeply misleading.

Choose any 5-minute section and I'll see if I can give examples.

[tg1w]

@EleanorHandcart Let's try his interpretation of the vacuum catastrophe part. Starting from around minute 40:00, he details a series of calculations that end around min 45:00 with the conclusion that the density of the observable universe is 10^55/cm^3, roughly 39 orders of magnitude lower than the renormalised vacuum density. He claims around min 46:00 that the implications of the vacuum catastrophe were ignored.

Thank you.

[EleanorHandcart]

@tg1w Sure. Ok, 40:00. Firstly, renormalisation is a complex procedure, but it's the process of relating the mathematical parameters of a quantum field theory (which are just numbers in equations) to the observable physical quantities. It is necessary whether or not infinities appear in the theory. Haramein's first mistake is to say (correctly) that the QFT equations give infinities, and to conclude (incorrectly) that this means there are physical infinities in the real world.

[tg1w]

@EleanorHandcart So hear you mean that renormalisation is what in other disciplines is called calibration? Adjusting parameter values so that the results of a model fit the real world?

Consequently, QFT can yield infinities, but based on a parameter values that are known to not be realistic? Are there parameters in QFT that can't be related to the real world i.e. that were just necessary for the purpose of the calculation, hence normalising them would not make sense?

[EleanorHandcart]

@tg1w renormalisation is a type of calibration - yes! In a way. The analogy is not perfect (otherwise they'd call it calibration) but that's basically the idea. An unrenormalised QFT is like an uncalibrated measuring device. If someone simply insists that the readings have to be right, they're liable to be seriously missing the point!

You might find the Wiki article on renormalisation (especially the section attitudes and interpretation) can shed a little light on this.

[EleanorHandcart]

@tg1w he then says that if space is infinitely dense, it would all cancel out and look to us like nothing. That goes entirely against everything in general relativity (I'll skip the details, question me more if you're interested) which is (a) one of the most accurate theories in history to which no exception has ever been found, and (b) the only theory that tells us black holes exist - so it's not something he can ignore when it suits him

[tg1w]

@EleanorHandcart Yes, I would be thankful in knowing why Haramein's interpretation goes against general relativity. 

[EleanorHandcart]

@tg1w general relativity tells us that the larger the mass or energy density, the larger the spacetime curvature, and this gives rise to what we experience as gravity. Infinite energy density would give infinite gravity and infinite compression. Look up the Schwarzschild radius - that's the smallest region of space in which we can pack a given amount of mass or energy without it all being *entirely inaccessible* to us behind an event horizon. With Nassim's numbers, everything would vanish.

[EleanorHandcart]

@tg1w he then says the infinities are renormalised away using the Planck length, which is wrong. That's something that's used in some physics textbooks as a baby example of renormalisation that is not meant to be taken seriously. It's a toy model that some physicists occasionally play with, but *none* would use this measurement of vacuum density to make any claims about the real world.

[tg1w]

@EleanorHandcart I see. So he's generalising the use of the Planck constant. Consequently, his reference to the Casimir effect is not really correct? Or, the proof of Casimir's theory does not stand?

[EleanorHandcart]

@tg1w The Casimir effect doesn't measure any kind of value for the vacuum energy, and it doesn't allow energy to be extracted from the vacuum. Casimir's theory (which is straight from pure, renormalised QFT) proposed that a force must exist between two conducting sheets because of the vacuum, and the measurements which were made many years later were in very precise agreement with his predictions. It's brilliant, but it's not what Nassim says it is.

[EleanorHandcart]

@tg1w (I shouldn't have used the word "measurement" - it's not a measurement. There are no measurements of vacuum energy density.) And there are no theories with any experimental support at all that suggest that any energy is removable from a vacuum.

That doesn't stop people looking at the first attempts at explanations on the first few pages of a QFT text, misunderstanding it, not looking any further, then presenting crowd-pleasing free energy talks on their misunderstandings.

[EleanorHandcart]

@tg1w hope that's helpful. Sorry if I referred to too many technical concepts, but he's talking about technical things so it's hard not to.

Regarding the "lungs", there's a nice description of what's wrong with that on Bobathon's blog. I don't know how to link to it but I think if you search for haramislead you should find it.

[tg1w]

@EleanorHandcart Hi there. I appreciate all your comments and, as a non-specialist, will look further into the literature. I'm having too difficulties with all these "precise" numbers and measurements and don't yet understand how the mass of the (observable) Universe (which is composed of protons) is the same as that in a proton volume i.e. 10^55 gm/cm^3.

I'm also skeptical of his dismissal of the strong force & dark energy/matter. I appreciate however a good challenge :).

[tg1w]

@EleanorHandcart Easiest way is to just copy & paste the URL of that blog post. I will do the search asap though. Thank you.

[tg1w]

@EleanorHandcart And if you've got an answer for the "guy inflating the balloon" (from 31:30 onwards) and the "contraction of the lungs" (in essence, the expansion of the Universe), that will be even greater. Thanks.

[tg1w]

@EleanorHandcart PS: Thank you in advance. (Had already reached the word limit in the previous comment).

[malahidecobra]

@EleanorHandcart Why not pose your question to Nassim and post the discussion? For as much as you claim he has talked big without saying anything of value, I could just as easily direct that accusation at yourself. What is your "authority" and better yet; why don't you DEFINE "authority" for us please...

[jKRAMER001]

@EleanorHandcart What exactly is it that we want to hear? That the universe is infinite? Can you prove that it's not?

[jKRAMER001]

@EleanorHandcart And what's so wrong with using intuition? Even Einstein said “I didn’t arrive at my understanding of the fundamental laws of the universe through my rational mind.”

[EleanorHandcart]

@jKRAMER001 I agree, intuition is essential. And after inspiration - when you have your great idea - what do you do then? You can (a) compare it to nature; do tests, check rigorously to see if it's really true in the real world; or (b) decide that your idea is too good for that, and start selling it to people who won't ask you and difficult questions.

(a) is science, and relies on honesty and integrity. (b) is a scam, and relies on charisma and rhetoric.

Nassim does only (b).

[b1ackm3ssiah]

@EleanorHandcart (a) Science, is also mainly based on math. simply put the Physic's of the modern era are beginning to support the Holofractographic universe theory.

remember all those people throughout history who said "NO you WRONG!." well, guess who that guy is now.... when Quantum Physic's continues to prove you wrong into the future, i hope you remember this :D

[EleanorHandcart]

@jKRAMER001 if you question it instead of just accepting it because it sounds nice, if you investigate it, you can see this for yourself. He's a fake.

If you don't care about that, then obviously you won't bother. That's fine. It's story time. Enjoy the ride.

[jKRAMER001]

@EleanorHandcart Who said anything about blindly accepting what he's saying? I actually do have an article (not by Nassim) called "Sensing Unbroken Wholeness," which proves everything he is saying ( and then some!)

[EleanorHandcart]

@jKRAMER001 if that's proof enough for you, then that is all you will do. That's ok.

[jKRAMER001]

@EleanorHandcart It's plenty of proof since it's backed by many nobel prize winning physicists. I only say that because alot of close-minded people won't believe anything unless it's backed by people who count, and not by some guy named Nassim.

[EleanorHandcart]

@jKRAMER001 You're saying that Nassim's work is backed by nobel prize winning physicists? Are you mental?

[jKRAMER001]

@EleanorHandcart YES. I have the freaking article. I can send it to you if you'd like, but I highly doubt you'll actually read it.

[jKRAMER001]

@EleanorHandcart Also note that Nassim's paper "The Schwartzschild Proton" has been approved and published in the American Institute of Physics magazine.

[Nelsentherep5150]

@EleanorHandcart I enjoy your use of 'Authority'. So if someone acquires proper pieces of paper awarded by government sanctioned Universities, then they are an 'Authority'. But independent study and contemplation is charlatanism. Well then, Nikola Tesla and Albert Einstein have preached nothing but idealism and witchcraft. If this is the dogma then hell, we should take our lessons from Wile E Coyote and the Roadrunner for our modern lessons in physics.

[BethWithes]

@EleanorHandcart What are your qualifications, please? Nassim's research received a Best Paper Award in the field of “Physics, Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, Field Theory, and Gravitation” during the 9th International Conference in Belgium. And yours? My intuition tells me you're either stupid, jealous, or a shill.

[Keally777]

Love this :) just amazing, and very well explained with great humor! thank you for sharing! :D

[craimer1]

so cool

[Jaynagurl1]

How can it be part of our evolution to literally transcend away from the surface of our planet, when it holds everything for our sustenance...the way our bodies are designed to process minerals properly from plants...the problem of astronauts leaving the atmosphere and dramatically decreasing in calcium, since we need earth's surface like a battery needs charging. Perhaps this is how it was meant to be, you know, since we are a part of it?

[Jaynagurl1]

This kind of tells me that the reason the world is mostly so crappy, is because there is an increasingly larger scale of jerks making life hell for others...yep, makes sense, lol

[arctictimberwolf]

@Jaynagurl1 Very wise sister !

[segomil]

Who is the clown announcer at the beginning ? This hat looks empty!

[Infokrigeren]

This is the man. The Einstein of the 21. Century. The 70+ year old physicists do not like this guy. Those who have worked on "The theory of everything" all their life, and then this dude comes up with a solution so simple and brilliant that even I can understand it...:-)

[Sweetybboy]

i would like know the truth of this man words.. smeone please!

ofcourse i believe to this man, but i just wanna know that this both things, perhaps i just doing mistake on this point.

[Sweetybboy]

if we live inside of the Black HOLES so then what is mean that when some scholars can see the another Black Hole in the universe which is the killing the Planets near by him??

i mean why we can see the another black hole if we`re inside of him already?? please someone can answer to me question.. maybe i am confused, cuz. mostly in the discovery channels never and ever said about that the our universe is inside of black hole,they said they`re is somewhere in galaxy another black hole.

[Jaynagurl1]

@Sweetybboy Perhaps he is saying that because there is infinite information within the boundaries, there would also be black holes within black holes, etc....I think, lol

[Sweetybboy]

@Jaynagurl1  hehe maybe you`re right.. i get this point too.. but i`ve not even thinked about it.. heh thnx :))))

[Jaynagurl1]

@Sweetybboy :-)

[MrOxize]

and his physics paper award is worth nothing. Its not acknowleged by top scientists.So kinda useless

[awakenedanonymous]

Thank you for what you do Nassim

[jimeaglesmith]

Religion creates a safe place for many... the world used to be Flat. Now its not. maybe there's a new world model yet to be discovered?!...the Movement/DVD 'Thrive' is one new model for a new World, check it  out!

in loving service,

jimiji

[JohnBlue813]

@jimeaglesmith I literally JUST got done watching Thrive!!!! AMAZING... Thats why I am now watching Sacred Geo videos:))Tetrahedron!!

[LocalSoothSayer]

It (the Money System) has throughout history caused Good men to do Bad things... it is time we addressed that problem as well... meaning, doing away with a MONEY SYSTEM... until we do that, no one even cares what you are talking about... they’re too busy trying to feed their children. The ones of us who DO care (like myself) typically are the ones who CANNOT feed their children, and we have grown weary.

[LocalSoothSayer]

You are RIGHT Mr. Haramein, about the Scientist in the science and physics communities conveniently making things fit their own hypotheses... it’s too bad that we live in a time where people have to do things like that to keep their jobs... the money system has us all doing ridiculous stuff to try to survive...

[mcnowski]

The vacuum is the dream or the imagination, its architecture is the culmination of our collection memory. A time will come when we can live in the imagination as tho it is the dominant space for our awareness.

[summondadrummin]

Why not call the atom a micro torus field rather than a black hole? The image derived from a torus shape or field seems more meaningful than the image created by the words black hole. Are they really any different in Nassim's theory? 

[johnnieo66]

Looks like Helen Keller watched this twice, Paul LaViolettes Videos are also excellent if you liked this!

[bhikshou]

nice concept..:)

[69Sirdragon]

I think were all cosmonauts already Ive seen this sacred geometry and everything is made up triangles it makes up our whole universe,its a multi verse with in, there's levels I dont agree with getting off the rock I think its inherently connected to the rest of the universe and a direct reflection of our unified consciousness,, Did I mention theirs Egyptians knowledge level and a garden level ? it even gets more interesting ALL DOGMAS PALE! to whats really going on =)

light n love

[69Sirdragon]

love his energy!

[naphatsiri8]

Yeah religions have to go and ofcourse will,when the Earthlings grow up one day.Religion would never be there in a non monetary system..Children logic.And its only a matter of time,happy to say:not long..The awakening already started years ago,so keep going Nassim full respect..Peace love&harmony dont need churches,but Jesus is still my brother if u know what I mean..Bgoooood LOVE everything its easy hugs from heaven C

[jag5599]

I Love Nassim, he is way beyond our current physicists

[marinaormes]

It's about time we questioned some fundamental assumptions.

[JG129]

At what school did he get his physics degree ???

[jimeaglesmith]

@JG129 Degree? His intellect goes beyond tradition thinking. whats more important, the paper it written on or the ability to stimulate the conversation where many more of us stretch our imaginations and look for our own answers? i say this from direct experience with Him and a lifetime of personal success with only a HS diploma. ;)

[meedeepeechee]

Excellent video!! Looking forward to the day science takes us exploring the universe with gravity drives, star gates, who knows... It doesn't matter as long as we get to leave the religious nuts here to wait for their various gods to return.

YAAAY!!!!

[MassesVclasses]

@meedeepeechee

Unified Theory unifies the religions too. You can apply this principle to anything. 

[meedeepeechee]

@MassesVclasses

Maybe so.. thats fine, but there is no need to take religions off Earth.. EVER.

YAAAY!!!!

[jimeaglesmith]

@meedeepeechee Agreed! they can survive as long as they learn to take care of it resectfully. ;)



[jimeaglesmith]

@MassesVclasses ;)

[jimeaglesmith]

@meedeepeechee  ;)