@logossfera Yes i know what it claims and its freakin dumb....we didnt come from hydrogen cells that came from nothing...Emc2....nothing can be created or destroyed...its either here from something or its not....evolution is a farce!
Another display of ignorance. Evolution has nothing to do with the creation of the universe. Insert new coin if you're not a Kent Hovind fan. If you are, don't reply, cause you're too fucked up.
"god did it" is never an explanation. your display of ignorance is still here, no matter what you think it's reasonable. evolution still has nothing to do with the origin of the universe, formation of chemical elements and even abiogenesis. given your "arguments" so far you're in no position to say what is reasonable or not.
@logossfera Its as simple as that i dont know why everyone has to make it so complicated....let me guess, you dont believe in God because of all the bad in the world...the wind is their and we cant see it but it still affects everything around it...is it going to take an angel to come down from heaven and in your face for you to believe....
let's not brush that easily the fact that your initial comments are idiotic and ignorant. this red herring doesn't work.
And to prove you continue to be an idiot... no, I am not an atheist because of all the bad in the world. I mean I could believe in God despite this fact. I could think she is a sadistic monster. Than again, I have enough imagination not be bound by a book wrote by scared, ignorant shepherds 3000 years ago.
So Lennox is a christian and he supports ID. What a surprise. So you don't have any example of a scientist that supports ID and is not religiously involved, ha?
No, I'm dismissing Flew because while he may accept parts of ID arguments he is not A SUPPORTER, you know... someone who tries to convice other of the truth of ID, goes into debates etc.
lurking in All our mind's a bias that shapes our opinions, attitudes, and stereotypes. This bias you and I have can be a manipulator and some bias twists behavior to its nefarious end. Bias aid in stirring up prejudice and a host of other pernicious preconceptions about members of various groups. Your conscious mind ignores this bias and assumes that only you "science" minded folk don't have a Bias But It's your disturbing world of implicit bias. thats set this video in motion. All have bias
2. processing of input and output; output devices like vocal cords that serve as speaker systems, and a variety of cellular clocks, machines, factories, transportation devices and conveyor systems that deliver manufactured products to precisely designated locations within the cell at the right time. Apparent design is reflected in the lexicon of biology: "Genetic code," "messenger RNA," and "the blueprint of life." Although apparent design does not prove design, it is evidence of design.
1. Life appears designed. ID theory arises from scientific observations and analyses of patterns and systems that occur in nature, particularly those that occur in living organisms. Generally all scientists concede that living systems give "the appearance of having of having been designed for a purpose." Systems that appear designed include sensory organs or "input devices" like eyes/ears/minds. "application software" that process the input and generate output; a biological "language".
Still doesn't answer my question. The intelligent design theory proposes a designer. It doesn't propose a designer who has a son and wrote the bible or had a prophet and wrote the quran. where are the supporters of the theory that are not religiously involved? the agenda behind ID is purely religious. That renders ID with zero scientific value. get back to me when the IDists will genuinely be interested in finding the truth and not to promote their religious agenda.
Your question is a logical dud. All Have bias EVERY ONE EVERYBODY EVEN YOU. The intelligent design theory proposes a designer true. as far as your godless bias you look at the same "facts" as do I and I see God's Hand YOU SEE Time and Chance where the supporters are godless which have become dogmatically and all most religious in there Hate. So YOU get back to me when your not promoting your godless dogmatic agenda.
:) Godless agenda? Evolution and big bang theory does not prove that god doesn't exist. I could easily believe that BB and evolution are god's intruments for creating life (the problem is that it doesn't follow that it is the god of the bible). So it's not a godless agenda (not even an agenda). On the other hand you have failed to show how ID is a scientific endeavour. After all, we could be a computer simulation. Where are the IDists that claim god is a programmer and this is Starcraft?
Evolution is dumb....were not freakin monkeys okay...
sararudd92 8 months ago
@sararudd92
So you don't know what evolution claims. Typical religious ignorance
logossfera 8 months ago
@logossfera Yes i know what it claims and its freakin dumb....we didnt come from hydrogen cells that came from nothing...Emc2....nothing can be created or destroyed...its either here from something or its not....evolution is a farce!
sararudd92 8 months ago
@sararudd92
Another display of ignorance. Evolution has nothing to do with the creation of the universe. Insert new coin if you're not a Kent Hovind fan. If you are, don't reply, cause you're too fucked up.
logossfera 8 months ago
@logossfera First of all i have no idea who that is...second of all thats still a resonable explation to a creator....
sararudd92 8 months ago
@sararudd92
"god did it" is never an explanation. your display of ignorance is still here, no matter what you think it's reasonable. evolution still has nothing to do with the origin of the universe, formation of chemical elements and even abiogenesis. given your "arguments" so far you're in no position to say what is reasonable or not.
logossfera 8 months ago
@logossfera Its as simple as that i dont know why everyone has to make it so complicated....let me guess, you dont believe in God because of all the bad in the world...the wind is their and we cant see it but it still affects everything around it...is it going to take an angel to come down from heaven and in your face for you to believe....
sararudd92 8 months ago
@sararudd92
let's not brush that easily the fact that your initial comments are idiotic and ignorant. this red herring doesn't work.
And to prove you continue to be an idiot... no, I am not an atheist because of all the bad in the world. I mean I could believe in God despite this fact. I could think she is a sadistic monster. Than again, I have enough imagination not be bound by a book wrote by scared, ignorant shepherds 3000 years ago.
logossfera 8 months ago
So Lennox is a christian and he supports ID. What a surprise. So you don't have any example of a scientist that supports ID and is not religiously involved, ha?
logossfera 2 years ago
Comment removed
lstdy 2 years ago
No, I'm dismissing Flew because while he may accept parts of ID arguments he is not A SUPPORTER, you know... someone who tries to convice other of the truth of ID, goes into debates etc.
logossfera 2 years ago
lurking in All our mind's a bias that shapes our opinions, attitudes, and stereotypes. This bias you and I have can be a manipulator and some bias twists behavior to its nefarious end. Bias aid in stirring up prejudice and a host of other pernicious preconceptions about members of various groups. Your conscious mind ignores this bias and assumes that only you "science" minded folk don't have a Bias But It's your disturbing world of implicit bias. thats set this video in motion. All have bias
GEERUP 4 years ago
Why are you fighting people looking for the truth. whatever it may be.
Staal75 3 years ago
2. processing of input and output; output devices like vocal cords that serve as speaker systems, and a variety of cellular clocks, machines, factories, transportation devices and conveyor systems that deliver manufactured products to precisely designated locations within the cell at the right time. Apparent design is reflected in the lexicon of biology: "Genetic code," "messenger RNA," and "the blueprint of life." Although apparent design does not prove design, it is evidence of design.
GEERUP 4 years ago
1. Life appears designed. ID theory arises from scientific observations and analyses of patterns and systems that occur in nature, particularly those that occur in living organisms. Generally all scientists concede that living systems give "the appearance of having of having been designed for a purpose." Systems that appear designed include sensory organs or "input devices" like eyes/ears/minds. "application software" that process the input and generate output; a biological "language".
GEERUP 4 years ago
Still doesn't answer my question. The intelligent design theory proposes a designer. It doesn't propose a designer who has a son and wrote the bible or had a prophet and wrote the quran. where are the supporters of the theory that are not religiously involved? the agenda behind ID is purely religious. That renders ID with zero scientific value. get back to me when the IDists will genuinely be interested in finding the truth and not to promote their religious agenda.
logossfera 4 years ago
Your question is a logical dud. All Have bias EVERY ONE EVERYBODY EVEN YOU. The intelligent design theory proposes a designer true. as far as your godless bias you look at the same "facts" as do I and I see God's Hand YOU SEE Time and Chance where the supporters are godless which have become dogmatically and all most religious in there Hate. So YOU get back to me when your not promoting your godless dogmatic agenda.
GEERUP 4 years ago
:) Godless agenda? Evolution and big bang theory does not prove that god doesn't exist. I could easily believe that BB and evolution are god's intruments for creating life (the problem is that it doesn't follow that it is the god of the bible). So it's not a godless agenda (not even an agenda). On the other hand you have failed to show how ID is a scientific endeavour. After all, we could be a computer simulation. Where are the IDists that claim god is a programmer and this is Starcraft?
logossfera 4 years ago
Science is the work of the devil. It sais do in the bible.
SFdixit 4 years ago
Science can be used as an Evil. Think Big killing war heads SFdixit do you think Killing in the name of Science is cool?
GEERUP 4 years ago