Я абсолютно согласна, что Гордеева и Гриньков были лучшими и в Калгари, и в Лиллехаммере. У них конечно замечаются небольшие ошибки, но зато они более артистичны и техничны. По этим критериям Мишкутенок и Дмитриев им проигрывают.
Lastly, since when did "passion" become the defining factor on who should win competitions? Last time I checked, technique and artistry were both important. Neither should get in the WAY of the other. In M&Ds case, I believe the artistry did get in the way. And while it made for a passionate performance, I would argue that it made for a messy one, technically, as well.
Both programs were amazing, but in the end, G&G's performance was (bare facts) technically harder, and skated clean.
I'm sick of seeing comments that say M&D had more passion. Why is that? Because they swung their arms around willy nilly? That's not how I equate passion.
Their choreography was DISTRACTING to a point where it was messy and, at that point, passion should not be rewarded. G&G, on the other hand, WERE passionate - IMO - but they remained poised and clean. And people keep pointing out how "noticeable" G&G's mistakes were. I'd argue they were so apparent because of how clean they skated otherwise.
contano l eleganza e la passione. non cado nel tranello con chi fa delle pose per sbalordire il pubblico. insomma m & d non li trovo cosi eleganti sono un po pesanti
"under the present scoring system GG would lose..." Based on the 2011 EC example, this statement is more than questionable. S&S made several minor mistakes and missed one whole element but won. They did have several deductions but their SP and the quality of other elements and skating in general outweighted those of K&S.
I long ago kind of stopped arguing, yet can't keep from yet another comment. What really amazes me is the ever lasting comments regarding the unfairness and favoritism of judges. Come on, guys. How one could bribe 8 out of 9 judges!In 2002, just one bribed judge was enough for a huge scandal. If talking about favoritism, then it might be fair to blame the Belorussian judge who was the only one to place MD first allegedly because Natalia was from Belorussia.
M & D will always be the Olympic champions for me. G & G were favored because skating officials wanted to keep the fairy tale of the photogenic couple in love who always wins the gold. They were a great pair, but I got sick of hearing how perfect and beautiful they were. I half expected EG was going to be pushed on me again when she took up with IK.
"Part III There was a lot of cross-overs from element to element." if not cross overs then what do you want them to do? FLY?
"program was lacking personality and character" Obviously you've not done your research.
Also ice-katers are always flexible but all those awkward kicks and leg-lifts just show case ugly crotch. Not to mention M&D's pair spin where he put his leg over her.. just messy, cheap trick.
'"program was lacking personality and character" Obviously you've not done your research.'
Research?? Do I need to do a research to find a program interesting/captivating? I wrote that it is a matter of taste, I do not understand your angry tone about my opinion.
'Also ice-katers are always flexible but all those awkward kicks and leg-lifts just show case ugly crotch. '
Yes, it happens that when skaters try to contort their bodies, it often results in an ugly position. Yet, this is not the case of Nathalia. She was very flexible, yet she always managed to hit a beautiful position.
'Not to mention M&D's pair spin where he put his leg over her.. '
Just paraphrasing you: what did you want him to do? FLY?
This 'comparison' is very one-sided and biased. First, the SP - G&G had a big mistake in spins. M&D clean. In LP - again, sbs unsynchronized (and there is so much raving about their perfect unison), wobble and unsynchro in jump sequence. Singled salchow. No triple side by side jump. M&D mistakes: slight wobble on step sequence (recovered very well by him, in character of the music), his 'stops' at the throw jumps, and I am not sure about the two-foot landing on 2A.
Yet, it’s less mistakes that 'weigh' less and they were not disturbing the program as much as G&G mistakes.Even if G&G had better flow,lines and lifts,it shouldnt make up in marks for numerous mistakes they made.Especially that MD were not novice junior skaters that would only stroke slowly from one board to another.And they had strong sides too-her flexibility that she WAS ABLE to use in the program.Katia maybe was flexible, but obviously she wasnt able to incorporate that in the skate
Additionally M&D had original moves that often stem from Natalia’s flexibility and Arthur’s creativity and personality. And synchronization! Wow, that was perfect unison! Finally, the least important part (since it is a matter of taste) G&G program, although pretty and elegant, was lacking personality and character. There was a lot of cross-overs from element to element. All in all, M&D were clear winners that night.
Mishkutenok&Dmitriev won in 1992 with mistakes since there was no one better - those who skated cleaner, weren't at the same level in the presentation .
In 1994 it wasn't so - both Gordeeva & Grinkov and Mishkutenok & Dmitriev were equally great artistically, each pair in their own way, but M&D also skated cleaner.
@LLLLutz umm no they are bit equal artistically; technically and artistically G&G have no equal. Did they make a few minor mistakes, yes, but i'd rather watch their glorioius elegant Moonlight than that over emoted all over the place badly costumed M&D circus show
It's up to your personal taste. G&G had an advantage at basic skating- flow and edging, as well as their lines were more polished. M&D had far more innovative and difficult choreography on their side, while G&G program was fairly empty between the elements and kind of old-fashioned. What do you prefer- is only a matter of taste.
@LLLLutz umm no they are not equal artistically; technically and artistically G&G have no equal. Did they make a few minor mistakes, yes, but i'd rather watch their glorioius elegant Moonlight than that over emoted all over the place badly costumed M&D circus show
mi dispiace ma non mi piace il gioco del confronto e trovo ki ha caricato il video di parte. G&G sono sempre splendidi e raffinati, leggeri e delicati ma li ho sempre trovati ripetitivi M&D hanno sperimentato si sono cimentati con grandi novità e alle olimpiadi la loro potenza e drammaticità, il loro sincronismo merita di essere premiato, men3 ho trovato giusta la loro vittoria agli europei dove sono stati paradisiaci, in questa gara meritavano il terzo posto
I have always enjoyed watching M&D, but they never compared to G&G except in audience appreciation. M&D were always crowd favorites for their showmanship and they deserved that adoration. But their skating never came close to G&G.
These 2 pairs belong to the best 4 ever in the History in ANY book (together with the Protapopovs and Shen-Zhao in my opinion).
It is just an unfortunate thing they had to compete each other.
G-G was the more elegant "leading role models" like Pamina-Tamino in the "Zauberflöte. M-D robbed everybody's heart with their passion and down-to-earth style Á la Papagena-Papageno.
You have made a good case here. I like that you showed that there is more to the argument than just "the crowd cheered louder for M&D therefor they should have won"
Both pairs were obviously excellent but I don't think G&G's gold is unjustifiable.
I don't agree at all, G&G had much more style. Such a pleasure to watch.. M&G were technical better. But figure skating is not only jumping and doing difficult moves.. G&G deserved the gold!
I agree. Mishkutenok & Dmitriev deserved first; Brasseur & Eisler second, and G&G third. But as we all know, the placements are "predfetermined", i.e., FIXED.
PS @ Nephertiti77, can you tell me what is that background music you've got going on for most of the video? I rather like it! Btw, while I completely understand you might be tired of controversy and people getting pissed off, a comparison of B&S with S&P from 2002 wouldn't just be nice, it is sorely needed, as there has been so much proof-less nonsense said on the issue! Thanks for this anyway.
Wow I can't believe Moskvina said something so wide off the mark (that "G&G will not mark an era")!! She is usually so sharp! Great vid, I always wondered about this result, it's great to see solid evidence to back it up. I like M&D lots too, but I do take issue when people say they expressed music better/more passionately, the styles were different that's all. More drama doesn't necessarily mean better, one subtle gesture can say so much.
I definitely thought that Mishkutenok & Dmitriev deserved the gold that year. But then, for some reason, I often think the silver skate is the better one.
@nephertiti77 I think it is a good job. As I perceive it your intention was to explain rankings rationally, because it seems that people tend to be very emotional and highly subjective in their assessment. That is why I really appreciate your job. Still, it is on spectator to understand your reasoning or to oppose it, and I think its quite upsetting that you lost motivation. As a complete amateur I enjoy the possibility to understand judging. Thanks!!
thank you for the comparison. you explained the reasons why the judges would have given G & G higher marks. i can definitely see how easy they make skating look. they make is look very easy.
No, G&G's program is not "passionate" in the M&D sense, but it is beautiful and austere, like a piece of Shaker furniture. You can't compare one style to the other, just as you can't compare the Romanticism of Rachmaninov to the classicism of Beethoven. They both have their own beauty.
As far as the skating, G&G had the edge in speed, line, unison and difficulty, while M&D skated with fewer mistakes. The judges made the right decison...
Interesting to see this stuff side by side. You've almost got me convinced. ;) I especially agree about the death spirals, no one wants to see a butt sticking up & bent knees. Still loved M&D's performance but you make good points.
I honestly blame moskovina for lack of foresight. She had to include more difficult elements. My favourite part in M&D program was at the end, when Arthur open his "heart" and then jumps twist and turn to catch Natalia. simply beautiful
Ekaterina was a true beauty which may have swayed people in her favor. ;) If you got it, USE it!! hehe
I do want to say that I was soooooo sad when Sergei died. That was heartbreaking. too young. too talented. too nice. too much in love to be lost... A great loss felt by all fans of beautiful skating..
I said that I am sure you're right about most of what you say. And I can appreciate the beauty and the oneness of G&G. Your tributes to Sergei are touching and heartfelt and well deserved. I still believe that M&D took skating to another level artistically because they could actually make me CRY from the sheer beauty and passion..! Dmitriev was indeed the standout in a sense but M w her flexibility and beauty, held her own.
Well it's obvious who YOU favor (are obsessed with..!).
Yes there are a lot of technicalities that G&G did very well and they were elegant and fine.
But the passion and beauty was on the side of M&D and everybody knew it in the stands. People whether judges or NOT, can't be easily fooled or moved to ovation.
M&D were the best pairs skaters ever, as they truly tell a story every time they are on the ice, and they MOVE people...to chills, to tears. It is way beyond skating w them; it is art.
M&D skated the performance of their life with this program. And they deserved the standing ovation because they moved everybody with this performance, and this is a gold medal performance. I think the problem lies on the fact that Moskovina didn't include as many difficult element as Zoueva did for G&G.
So well people when you post your comments make sure you check HOW TO WRITE RUSSIANS LAST NAMES- Moskvina! NOT MOSKOVINA!!! she does not have any relation to MOSCOW city!!!!
Exactly, the judges got caught in 2002 and that is why the scoring system changed. You posted that the scoring system changed because of the 1990 worlds competition. This is not correct.
They were both very good, but on this occasion that evening M&D were the better pair. More passion, more art and the public in the hall thought so too.
Are you kidding, G&G did NOT win fairly and this is not the first time. Take a look at 1990 worlds. I was there and everybody was talking about the judging was so unfair. It's obvious that judges were being bride. That's why the scoring system changed. My opinion, The wrong team won.
This is hilarious. Do your research. The scoring system did NOT change because of the results at 1990 worlds. They changed because of the 2002 Olympic judging controversy.
This was the good old days when judges were being bride and the out come was already known before anybody skated. The new scoring system would put M&D ahead of G&G.
G&G is overrated. Of course it's easier to lift and throw a 80 pound woman. Sergei was a better and higher level skater than his wife and it shows. Another overrated skater is Kristi Y. Midori skates faster, stronger and her jumps were a whole lot higher than Kristi. Again, in the new scoring system Midori would have won.
Actually, the new scoring system would reward G&G, who would receive higher GOE's for their elements, and would score more points because of the number of elements (i.e. more lifts and death spirals, more difficult sbs spins).
Are you kidding? Do you see her using the wrong edge when she jumps. Also their lifts were not as creative as M&D. Her death spiral is weak. Tell me what G&G signature move is? Because they don't have one!!!!!
Their split triple twist, to name one. Also, you don't explain why G&G's death spiral is weak. Here is why it is strong: in both the back outside and forward inside, her back is well-arched, he is in a low pivot, and they flow in and out with great speed. Those are all the qualities of a good death spiral. If you don't like G&G's style, fine. But you obviously don't know skating technique if you think G&G's death spiral is weak.
Actually each G&G program has a unique (not an overhead but a dance) lift in it that's more like a signature to the program Katia's death spiral is weak, huh? Please tell me who in THIS competition did a stronger death spiral (2 different ones no less.) If you want to split hairs, I guess one could argue that her take off for the twist lift is wrong (not a true lutz entry) but twists can have different entries. Pls explain where she uses the wrong edge on her jumps so I can see for myself.
I should have watched your whole video before making that comment. The argument for G&G makes a lot of sense. So M&D were not completely clean. G&G were neater, straighter. I still prefer the drama and passion of M&D, but the case is not clear cut as I had thought.
I think it's clear M&D outskated G&G both technically and artistically. G&G made two mistakes (very minor) while M&D made no obvious mistakes (at one point Artur seemed to slip just a bit on the footwork, but you can't tell if it's a mistake). M&D were so passionate and dramatic. If both teams skated flawlessly, I could see there being a debate. But I think it came down to who skated first. It might have been different if M&D had skated after G&G.
You put a lot of work into this and I respect your expertise. Your side-by-side comparisons of all the different elements in each program make it clear this really was no contest! (I'm one of those who did feel M&D were robbed.) Now that you've pointed them out, I can't get past the ruffles and flourishes that M&D used to hide the fact that their footwork wasn't as hard as G&G's and that Natalia's landings and death spirals were going to be iffy at best. Wish you would do more of these! :-)
I remember this evening very vividly....the Lillehammer spectators were actually HOWLING in excitement and approval toward the conclusion of M&D's performance. I've NEVER heard a reaction like that for ANY skating performance,let alone pairs.
M&D should have taken Gold that night..I know it... you know it... the whole world knew it.
I agree gandy, this was a night I'll never forget. M&D were so rousing and emotional and beautiful...they should have won. Everybody knew it except the lame judges who wanted it to be GG. Nothing against them as they were very special too. But not as passionate. M&D brought tears to my eyes it was so beautiful.. the only other time that happened was Oksana's SP (black swan) and in the exhibition. (white; Swan Lake) What a special time for skating... I miss those days.. saw the tour..AMAZING!
The judges have way too much power in this sport. Judges have indeed a trained eye. But, by the way judges thought back then, it's very likely that M&D had created doubs in the judges minds, by missing a lift in their SP just a month before the Oly, at Euros, and then, as per other sources, they minght have confirmed the second place by missing the lift of their SP, during practise time. I'm talking about that unfortunate lift were poor Natalia hit the ice very hard.
I didn't know G & G and M & D back then ... I saw the performances and I thought that despite the flaws G & G were technically and artistically superior. G & G had a lightness and grace with their movements _ their lifts looked effortless ... and their edges were simply superb.
The problem is that G&G do everything between the moves faster, better unison, skate faster. The olympics was the only time in their careers the M&D ever skated clean. I understand the argument in favor of M&D but there is no comparison in the quality of the basic skating. G&G's side by side double axels were worth ten M&D triple toes.
I like the footage that you have of G&Gs split triple twist from Calgary... it's at a different camera angle than the footage that they usually show of that program.
While I prefer M&D,I understand why others prefer G&G. I do find it odd that the fact that M&D had more difficult throw and jump content was not commented on during this opinion piece...
Even though I would have given the gold to G&G, I agree that M&D clean sbs triple toe jumps should have been mentioned in this piece, especially since it included a count of all the axel jumps that G&G attempted.
I also didn't care for the caption about G&G turning pro because of M&D improving, I really don't think that had anything to do with their decision.
I really appreciate this video and the debate at hand. If there ever was an Olympics where two golds should have been awarded this one is the one. While I adore G&G and believe they were technically superior, I believe that M&D were artistically superior. But really, I don't think there is anyone who would wish ill will on G&G--they were universally cherished. Someone had to win and it was a great, memorable, well-fought battle for the ages.
great video. i too believe that G&G deserved to win the gold 100%.
and on another note, based on this "I-ibralady1010" vs "libralady1010," this g&g m&d fight is getting out of control. I may not agree with the original libralady1010 about m&d, but I-ibralady1010 has gone overboard with this fake posts. not cool at all.
6:27 and 6:30 tell the whole story, folks. !! "G&G's lift was fast, high and clean"...
So true, SO TRUE. This video just gives me a whole new appreciation for G&G and ONCE AGAIN, confirms why they won in Lillehammer. OMG, this video is just sublime. S-U-B-L-I-M-E. 5 Stars.
Hi everyone, just to let you know that although it looks like we have two libralady1010, the one pro G&G it's spelt with capital "i", and should not be confused with libralady1010 who favours M&D. if you want to know who is who, just click on their usernames. And pls stop flagging down libralady1010 pro M&D. thank you
Thank YOU nepheriti77 for clarifying the situation. My heart goes out to you and my apologies to you as well. Everyone knows what's what &who's who now. I-ibralady 1010 is pitiful. Those red flags actually make it look like the holidays(!) together with the green! Cheers nephertiti77 ;-)
Hi liberlady1010 - Nephertiti's reputation is not on the line in this instant as it's not her problem if someone has chosen to have a user name similar to yours - there are loads of usernames which are similar on youtube, and indeed all over the internet. I wouldn't worry about what others write. As nephertiti said above, if they click on each profile, they will see it's a different account. If you happen to get negative messages regarding someone else's comments, just explain that it's not you.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Piccolopiero, I totally back up with you on this matter. Such things are unacceptable. Whoever has hacked Libralady's account must watch this video once again to remember that "Our honor is our honesty" (Sergey Grinkov)
Once again, nephertiti77, you have done a PERFECT job with this video illustrating why G&G were/are still remembered as one of the greatest pairs skaters ever. Easily trumps M&D. Must be why 8 of the 9 judges placed G&G 1st. What the hell was the other judge thinking? LOL!
Hi Libra, and thank you for your nice comments. I must say that yesterday I couldn't post a comment with the full name of TA1996, this system must have very powerful filters.
G&G were the best here. And all this time i thought M&D were the true champions. Thank-you for this in-depth analysis- just again proves G&G are far superior by step, presentation, partner, finesse.
I DID NOT post these comments! How do I know? BECAUSE I CANNOT DELETE THEM! If one cannot agree to disagree because Skating has always been about personal preference then maybe I don't want to discourse on it anymore. I'm asking you: TAKE THEM DOWN! I did not write them!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Please everyone...I am surprised and sad at what happened to our yt friend and all the videos a few days ago. Think everyone knows whom I am speaking of. I hope this comes to a satisfactory resolution very soon. He is a true fan of Skating w/an awesome collection. Why the powers that be are suddenly doing this-don't know. He only does this strictly as a fan of Skating. Some prefer chocolate,some vanilla.
Hatula, they are not your favourite skaters, ok. But we are talking about Lillehammer, and Nephertiti has given a CLEAR technical analysis of the two programs, and you should just bow to the facts: they deserved the gold medal.
This is not the technical analysis by any means- this is a tribute to G&G made by their fan.
Had it been the technical analysis we would see all the elements of each pair with UNBIASED and PROFESSIONAL conclusions. This montage shows only the elements the author had chosen to show, and very biased and sometimes just wrong commentaries as a conclusion.
Let's take for an example the step seq- we would see the step seq of each pair with a commentary of "M&D had the most difficult and interesting step seq in pairs but it had a unison brake for a second. G&G had the simpliest step seq but it was clean". We would also see M&D's perfect sbs 3 toes, G&G unison breaks on sbs spins in both programs etc.
M&D did a simple sit spin into a standing up spin. G&G did a flying camels into a back sit spins into a single loop into a sit position-back sit spins for a total of 15 rotations against the 9 of M&D. They lost and regain the unison only on the last few rotations, coming out of it in perfect unison.
Well, G&G didnt really have a simple step sequence. It was done by holding hands and a great speed which meant that if one of them tripped on the ice, the other one would be dragged down as well.
So, you don't trust a person who has a lot of experience in figure skating....you don't trust the olympic judges.......you don't trust the sport commentators....well, I guess there's nothing else I can do to show you what's absolutely clear..... :)
You are convinced that they were the "greatest ever", not the entire world.
G&G were just an improved version of Rodnina&Zaitzev, Pershina&Akbarov, Cherkasova&Shachray and many others Zhuk's pairs- technically strong (except for the jumps), but absolutely lacking inviduality, choreography and interpretation.
So if think they were great, many other people think different.
This montage is an incredible example of an comletely biased G&G fan, trying to convience the world how great G&G were.
How did you miss the fact that M&D had a perfect sbs 3toe? The fact that they had two triple throws to G&G one (and axel was flawed by the way). And G&G were original? Since when? They programs were painfully empty of any transition or choreography or interpretation in 1985-1990. And 1994 again was the same endless crossovers between the technical moves.
indeed, if nattalia had so much flexibility, how come m&d could never do a good death spiral? even kazakova herself had problems with the BODS despite her flexibility
Actually, this video has helped me to spot same "trademark" inferiority skating with all Moskvina's students: even Berezhnaya&Sikharulidze who were claimed to be "a perfect blend of G&G and M&D" had same problems with spirals, stopping before throws and probably something else.
B&S had the best spirals ever among pairs, better than G&G and they had the best entry into throws- first they did a perfect pair spiral all rink lenght and without losing ANY speed they immidiately entered the throw. No other pair was/is able of performing such a move.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I have to say that split position in the air was not very attractive. Zhuk also coached Stanislav Leonivich who had a tiny partner @ the 1980 Games. He was G&G's first coach. I know he was in Cinncinati w/them in 1987 as I saw them at the Skaters' Market and in Halifax in 1990.
May I correct you? Stanislav Leonovich was G&G's second coach. Zhuk was first. They left him for Leonovich because of the difficult personality and drinking habits of Zhuk...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I mis-spoke. Zhuk was Leonovich's coach while he was skating. I know Zhuk was Rodnina's coach for a time until she/they left him for Tarasova before the 1976 Olympics. You have to understand:-we had very limited information for a long time. The federations-like federations all over the world, only tell what they want you to know.
Yep, imagining M&D with gold and G&G with silver is totally ridiculous after this video. The situation now looks different from many aspects. Like before US judge was thought to be most biased, as he scored M&D with 5.6 and G&G with 5.8. Now he (or was it she?) appears to be both the most demanding and objective. Good for him/her!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Jesus, thanks god there was somebody who took his/her time to make this video. Discussions are all well and good but now it is so clear. A mere textbook of figure skating. And in a perfect quality. Thank you!!!
Я абсолютно согласна, что Гордеева и Гриньков были лучшими и в Калгари, и в Лиллехаммере. У них конечно замечаются небольшие ошибки, но зато они более артистичны и техничны. По этим критериям Мишкутенок и Дмитриев им проигрывают.
Lena14121 1 week ago
(Cont)
Lastly, since when did "passion" become the defining factor on who should win competitions? Last time I checked, technique and artistry were both important. Neither should get in the WAY of the other. In M&Ds case, I believe the artistry did get in the way. And while it made for a passionate performance, I would argue that it made for a messy one, technically, as well.
Both programs were amazing, but in the end, G&G's performance was (bare facts) technically harder, and skated clean.
noevoe978 3 months ago
I'm sick of seeing comments that say M&D had more passion. Why is that? Because they swung their arms around willy nilly? That's not how I equate passion.
Their choreography was DISTRACTING to a point where it was messy and, at that point, passion should not be rewarded. G&G, on the other hand, WERE passionate - IMO - but they remained poised and clean. And people keep pointing out how "noticeable" G&G's mistakes were. I'd argue they were so apparent because of how clean they skated otherwise.
noevoe978 3 months ago
contano l eleganza e la passione. non cado nel tranello con chi fa delle pose per sbalordire il pubblico. insomma m & d non li trovo cosi eleganti sono un po pesanti
naialah 4 months ago
M&D's lifts didn't look so good. It looked like it took a lot of effort for them. Either Natalia was too heavy, or Artur was not very strong.
kookykrumbs 7 months ago
My god, man, it was 1994 and one of the skaters is dead. Maybe they shouldn't have won, who cares at this point?
bagman817 9 months ago
@bagman817 - I think the point is to compare different versions of greatness. Both pairs will godown in history as great.
officeaddict33 5 months ago
"under the present scoring system GG would lose..." Based on the 2011 EC example, this statement is more than questionable. S&S made several minor mistakes and missed one whole element but won. They did have several deductions but their SP and the quality of other elements and skating in general outweighted those of K&S.
oravaskvirel 1 year ago
I long ago kind of stopped arguing, yet can't keep from yet another comment. What really amazes me is the ever lasting comments regarding the unfairness and favoritism of judges. Come on, guys. How one could bribe 8 out of 9 judges!In 2002, just one bribed judge was enough for a huge scandal. If talking about favoritism, then it might be fair to blame the Belorussian judge who was the only one to place MD first allegedly because Natalia was from Belorussia.
oravaskvirel 1 year ago
M & D will always be the Olympic champions for me. G & G were favored because skating officials wanted to keep the fairy tale of the photogenic couple in love who always wins the gold. They were a great pair, but I got sick of hearing how perfect and beautiful they were. I half expected EG was going to be pushed on me again when she took up with IK.
lizzydarcy72 1 year ago
"Part III There was a lot of cross-overs from element to element." if not cross overs then what do you want them to do? FLY?
"program was lacking personality and character" Obviously you've not done your research.
Also ice-katers are always flexible but all those awkward kicks and leg-lifts just show case ugly crotch. Not to mention M&D's pair spin where he put his leg over her.. just messy, cheap trick.
lastsundaydrive 1 year ago
@lastsundaydrive
'"program was lacking personality and character" Obviously you've not done your research.'
Research?? Do I need to do a research to find a program interesting/captivating? I wrote that it is a matter of taste, I do not understand your angry tone about my opinion.
gusieczka 1 year ago 3
@lastsundaydrive
'Also ice-katers are always flexible but all those awkward kicks and leg-lifts just show case ugly crotch. '
Yes, it happens that when skaters try to contort their bodies, it often results in an ugly position. Yet, this is not the case of Nathalia. She was very flexible, yet she always managed to hit a beautiful position.
'Not to mention M&D's pair spin where he put his leg over her.. '
Just paraphrasing you: what did you want him to do? FLY?
gusieczka 1 year ago 2
@lastsundaydrive
'There was a lot of cross-overs from element to element." if not cross overs then what do you want them to do? FLY?'
Have you heard of transitions??
gusieczka 1 year ago 3
PART I
This 'comparison' is very one-sided and biased. First, the SP - G&G had a big mistake in spins. M&D clean. In LP - again, sbs unsynchronized (and there is so much raving about their perfect unison), wobble and unsynchro in jump sequence. Singled salchow. No triple side by side jump. M&D mistakes: slight wobble on step sequence (recovered very well by him, in character of the music), his 'stops' at the throw jumps, and I am not sure about the two-foot landing on 2A.
gusieczka 1 year ago 3
PART II
Yet, it’s less mistakes that 'weigh' less and they were not disturbing the program as much as G&G mistakes.Even if G&G had better flow,lines and lifts,it shouldnt make up in marks for numerous mistakes they made.Especially that MD were not novice junior skaters that would only stroke slowly from one board to another.And they had strong sides too-her flexibility that she WAS ABLE to use in the program.Katia maybe was flexible, but obviously she wasnt able to incorporate that in the skate
gusieczka 1 year ago
PART III
Additionally M&D had original moves that often stem from Natalia’s flexibility and Arthur’s creativity and personality. And synchronization! Wow, that was perfect unison! Finally, the least important part (since it is a matter of taste) G&G program, although pretty and elegant, was lacking personality and character. There was a lot of cross-overs from element to element. All in all, M&D were clear winners that night.
gusieczka 1 year ago
@wwDevichan
Mishkutenok&Dmitriev won in 1992 with mistakes since there was no one better - those who skated cleaner, weren't at the same level in the presentation .
In 1994 it wasn't so - both Gordeeva & Grinkov and Mishkutenok & Dmitriev were equally great artistically, each pair in their own way, but M&D also skated cleaner.
LLLLutz 1 year ago 10
@LLLLutz umm no they are bit equal artistically; technically and artistically G&G have no equal. Did they make a few minor mistakes, yes, but i'd rather watch their glorioius elegant Moonlight than that over emoted all over the place badly costumed M&D circus show
Fabstaire 1 year ago
@Fabstaire
It's up to your personal taste. G&G had an advantage at basic skating- flow and edging, as well as their lines were more polished. M&D had far more innovative and difficult choreography on their side, while G&G program was fairly empty between the elements and kind of old-fashioned. What do you prefer- is only a matter of taste.
LLLLutz 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@LLLLutz umm no they are not equal artistically; technically and artistically G&G have no equal. Did they make a few minor mistakes, yes, but i'd rather watch their glorioius elegant Moonlight than that over emoted all over the place badly costumed M&D circus show
Fabstaire 1 year ago
mi dispiace ma non mi piace il gioco del confronto e trovo ki ha caricato il video di parte. G&G sono sempre splendidi e raffinati, leggeri e delicati ma li ho sempre trovati ripetitivi M&D hanno sperimentato si sono cimentati con grandi novità e alle olimpiadi la loro potenza e drammaticità, il loro sincronismo merita di essere premiato, men3 ho trovato giusta la loro vittoria agli europei dove sono stati paradisiaci, in questa gara meritavano il terzo posto
signorinakitty 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have always enjoyed watching M&D, but they never compared to G&G except in audience appreciation. M&D were always crowd favorites for their showmanship and they deserved that adoration. But their skating never came close to G&G.
gslead 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Gordeeva and Grinkov were better looking. So there.
kookykrumbs 1 year ago
These 2 pairs belong to the best 4 ever in the History in ANY book (together with the Protapopovs and Shen-Zhao in my opinion).
It is just an unfortunate thing they had to compete each other.
G-G was the more elegant "leading role models" like Pamina-Tamino in the "Zauberflöte. M-D robbed everybody's heart with their passion and down-to-earth style Á la Papagena-Papageno.
BigdealXXIII 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I didn't agree with the people who wrote down that M&D were better. And yes, I saw the whole video... :)
Wennetje26 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You have made a good case here. I like that you showed that there is more to the argument than just "the crowd cheered louder for M&D therefor they should have won"
Both pairs were obviously excellent but I don't think G&G's gold is unjustifiable.
FettesHouse 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is truly hilarious how people keep posting comments without even watching the video in full.
oravaskvirel 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't agree at all, G&G had much more style. Such a pleasure to watch.. M&G were technical better. But figure skating is not only jumping and doing difficult moves.. G&G deserved the gold!
Wennetje26 1 year ago
I agree. Mishkutenok & Dmitriev deserved first; Brasseur & Eisler second, and G&G third. But as we all know, the placements are "predfetermined", i.e., FIXED.
artlife1010 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
May I ask, who do you agree with? Have you seen the video in full?
oravaskvirel 1 year ago
@artlife1010
i agree whit you!
signorinakitty 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PS @ Nephertiti77, can you tell me what is that background music you've got going on for most of the video? I rather like it! Btw, while I completely understand you might be tired of controversy and people getting pissed off, a comparison of B&S with S&P from 2002 wouldn't just be nice, it is sorely needed, as there has been so much proof-less nonsense said on the issue! Thanks for this anyway.
SvetlanaMillionaya 2 years ago 18
@SvetlanaMillionaya Hi, It's called "The a la menthe". And, ok i'll think about S&P and B&S video :)
nephertiti77 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That would be great!!! We all are wating!
oravaskvirel 2 years ago
Wow I can't believe Moskvina said something so wide off the mark (that "G&G will not mark an era")!! She is usually so sharp! Great vid, I always wondered about this result, it's great to see solid evidence to back it up. I like M&D lots too, but I do take issue when people say they expressed music better/more passionately, the styles were different that's all. More drama doesn't necessarily mean better, one subtle gesture can say so much.
SvetlanaMillionaya 2 years ago 7
I definitely thought that Mishkutenok & Dmitriev deserved the gold that year. But then, for some reason, I often think the silver skate is the better one.
DarcyTV1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks!Can you do the same with Berezhnaya & Sikharulidze versus Sale & Pelletier? I would really appreciate.
Danicequeen 2 years ago 24
Well, the comparison between G&G and M&D has upset quite a few people. Therefore I think I'll pass on this one.
nephertiti77 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nephertiti77 I think it is a good job. As I perceive it your intention was to explain rankings rationally, because it seems that people tend to be very emotional and highly subjective in their assessment. That is why I really appreciate your job. Still, it is on spectator to understand your reasoning or to oppose it, and I think its quite upsetting that you lost motivation. As a complete amateur I enjoy the possibility to understand judging. Thanks!!
Danicequeen 2 years ago 4
thank you for the comparison. you explained the reasons why the judges would have given G & G higher marks. i can definitely see how easy they make skating look. they make is look very easy.
mom232000 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No, G&G's program is not "passionate" in the M&D sense, but it is beautiful and austere, like a piece of Shaker furniture. You can't compare one style to the other, just as you can't compare the Romanticism of Rachmaninov to the classicism of Beethoven. They both have their own beauty.
As far as the skating, G&G had the edge in speed, line, unison and difficulty, while M&D skated with fewer mistakes. The judges made the right decison...
justpeachy130 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Interesting to see this stuff side by side. You've almost got me convinced. ;) I especially agree about the death spirals, no one wants to see a butt sticking up & bent knees. Still loved M&D's performance but you make good points.
tbl35 2 years ago
I honestly blame moskovina for lack of foresight. She had to include more difficult elements. My favourite part in M&D program was at the end, when Arthur open his "heart" and then jumps twist and turn to catch Natalia. simply beautiful
nephertiti77 2 years ago
Ekaterina was a true beauty which may have swayed people in her favor. ;) If you got it, USE it!! hehe
I do want to say that I was soooooo sad when Sergei died. That was heartbreaking. too young. too talented. too nice. too much in love to be lost... A great loss felt by all fans of beautiful skating..
beckylink 2 years ago
Wow I tried to post and it got lost...annoying!!!
I said that I am sure you're right about most of what you say. And I can appreciate the beauty and the oneness of G&G. Your tributes to Sergei are touching and heartfelt and well deserved. I still believe that M&D took skating to another level artistically because they could actually make me CRY from the sheer beauty and passion..! Dmitriev was indeed the standout in a sense but M w her flexibility and beauty, held her own.
beckylink 2 years ago 2
To be honest with you, I think that the judges have been quite unfair with them in so mamy occasions. And their skating will never be replaced.
nephertiti77 2 years ago
Well it's obvious who YOU favor (are obsessed with..!).
Yes there are a lot of technicalities that G&G did very well and they were elegant and fine.
But the passion and beauty was on the side of M&D and everybody knew it in the stands. People whether judges or NOT, can't be easily fooled or moved to ovation.
M&D were the best pairs skaters ever, as they truly tell a story every time they are on the ice, and they MOVE people...to chills, to tears. It is way beyond skating w them; it is art.
beckylink 2 years ago 2
Hi Becky, you got me there :)
M&D skated the performance of their life with this program. And they deserved the standing ovation because they moved everybody with this performance, and this is a gold medal performance. I think the problem lies on the fact that Moskovina didn't include as many difficult element as Zoueva did for G&G.
nephertiti77 2 years ago
So well people when you post your comments make sure you check HOW TO WRITE RUSSIANS LAST NAMES- Moskvina! NOT MOSKOVINA!!! she does not have any relation to MOSCOW city!!!!
pick5667 2 years ago
I love both pairs, but MD just had that passion behind them on this night. Their performance was unbelievable. They should have won.
xtracex77 2 years ago 4
Geez, get lives!
1malmis 2 years ago
Wow, you really think it only happen in 2002. It been going on way longer than that. They only got caught in 2002.
jerrm4 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jerrm4
Exactly, the judges got caught in 2002 and that is why the scoring system changed. You posted that the scoring system changed because of the 1990 worlds competition. This is not correct.
stanhope84 2 years ago
They were both very good, but on this occasion that evening M&D were the better pair. More passion, more art and the public in the hall thought so too.
Krawi6 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Bite me, G&G won fairly, they were the best, pull your head out of your butt, M&D were great, but G%G were god-like, even with mistakes!
kplusthree 2 years ago
Are you kidding, G&G did NOT win fairly and this is not the first time. Take a look at 1990 worlds. I was there and everybody was talking about the judging was so unfair. It's obvious that judges were being bride. That's why the scoring system changed. My opinion, The wrong team won.
jerrm4 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@jerrm4
This is hilarious. Do your research. The scoring system did NOT change because of the results at 1990 worlds. They changed because of the 2002 Olympic judging controversy.
stanhope84 2 years ago
G&G won fair & square!! Thats my opinion!! M&D are excellent skaters as well...but clearly G&G are the superior of the 2!!
drewson88 2 years ago
This was the good old days when judges were being bride and the out come was already known before anybody skated. The new scoring system would put M&D ahead of G&G.
G&G is overrated. Of course it's easier to lift and throw a 80 pound woman. Sergei was a better and higher level skater than his wife and it shows. Another overrated skater is Kristi Y. Midori skates faster, stronger and her jumps were a whole lot higher than Kristi. Again, in the new scoring system Midori would have won.
jerrm4 2 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
@jerrm4
Actually, the new scoring system would reward G&G, who would receive higher GOE's for their elements, and would score more points because of the number of elements (i.e. more lifts and death spirals, more difficult sbs spins).
stanhope84 2 years ago
Are you kidding? Do you see her using the wrong edge when she jumps. Also their lifts were not as creative as M&D. Her death spiral is weak. Tell me what G&G signature move is? Because they don't have one!!!!!
jerrm4 2 years ago 3
@jerrm4
Their split triple twist, to name one. Also, you don't explain why G&G's death spiral is weak. Here is why it is strong: in both the back outside and forward inside, her back is well-arched, he is in a low pivot, and they flow in and out with great speed. Those are all the qualities of a good death spiral. If you don't like G&G's style, fine. But you obviously don't know skating technique if you think G&G's death spiral is weak.
stanhope84 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Actually each G&G program has a unique (not an overhead but a dance) lift in it that's more like a signature to the program Katia's death spiral is weak, huh? Please tell me who in THIS competition did a stronger death spiral (2 different ones no less.) If you want to split hairs, I guess one could argue that her take off for the twist lift is wrong (not a true lutz entry) but twists can have different entries. Pls explain where she uses the wrong edge on her jumps so I can see for myself.
MelleAndKev 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I should have watched your whole video before making that comment. The argument for G&G makes a lot of sense. So M&D were not completely clean. G&G were neater, straighter. I still prefer the drama and passion of M&D, but the case is not clear cut as I had thought.
dylanvalente 2 years ago
I think it's clear M&D outskated G&G both technically and artistically. G&G made two mistakes (very minor) while M&D made no obvious mistakes (at one point Artur seemed to slip just a bit on the footwork, but you can't tell if it's a mistake). M&D were so passionate and dramatic. If both teams skated flawlessly, I could see there being a debate. But I think it came down to who skated first. It might have been different if M&D had skated after G&G.
dylanvalente 2 years ago 13
This has been flagged as spam show
You put a lot of work into this and I respect your expertise. Your side-by-side comparisons of all the different elements in each program make it clear this really was no contest! (I'm one of those who did feel M&D were robbed.) Now that you've pointed them out, I can't get past the ruffles and flourishes that M&D used to hide the fact that their footwork wasn't as hard as G&G's and that Natalia's landings and death spirals were going to be iffy at best. Wish you would do more of these! :-)
LWOPP 2 years ago
I remember this evening very vividly....the Lillehammer spectators were actually HOWLING in excitement and approval toward the conclusion of M&D's performance. I've NEVER heard a reaction like that for ANY skating performance,let alone pairs.
M&D should have taken Gold that night..I know it... you know it... the whole world knew it.
gandy74 2 years ago 9
I agree gandy, this was a night I'll never forget. M&D were so rousing and emotional and beautiful...they should have won. Everybody knew it except the lame judges who wanted it to be GG. Nothing against them as they were very special too. But not as passionate. M&D brought tears to my eyes it was so beautiful.. the only other time that happened was Oksana's SP (black swan) and in the exhibition. (white; Swan Lake) What a special time for skating... I miss those days.. saw the tour..AMAZING!
beckylink 2 years ago 2
The judges have way too much power in this sport. Judges have indeed a trained eye. But, by the way judges thought back then, it's very likely that M&D had created doubs in the judges minds, by missing a lift in their SP just a month before the Oly, at Euros, and then, as per other sources, they minght have confirmed the second place by missing the lift of their SP, during practise time. I'm talking about that unfortunate lift were poor Natalia hit the ice very hard.
nephertiti77 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I didn't know G & G and M & D back then ... I saw the performances and I thought that despite the flaws G & G were technically and artistically superior. G & G had a lightness and grace with their movements _ their lifts looked effortless ... and their edges were simply superb.
bebingc 2 years ago 2
nephertiti77, thank you for this video. I enjoyed it.
TUMuenchen 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
judges couldn't see beyond the physical beauty of G&G
mamadoenut 2 years ago
Comment removed
oravaskvirel 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The problem is that G&G do everything between the moves faster, better unison, skate faster. The olympics was the only time in their careers the M&D ever skated clean. I understand the argument in favor of M&D but there is no comparison in the quality of the basic skating. G&G's side by side double axels were worth ten M&D triple toes.
jondavwal 2 years ago
I like the footage that you have of G&Gs split triple twist from Calgary... it's at a different camera angle than the footage that they usually show of that program.
MelleAndKev 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
While I prefer M&D,I understand why others prefer G&G. I do find it odd that the fact that M&D had more difficult throw and jump content was not commented on during this opinion piece...
loola234 2 years ago 14
Comment removed
stanhope84 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Throws and jumps have been widely compared, from 07:15 to 08:44......
Piccolopiero 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Even though I would have given the gold to G&G, I agree that M&D clean sbs triple toe jumps should have been mentioned in this piece, especially since it included a count of all the axel jumps that G&G attempted.
I also didn't care for the caption about G&G turning pro because of M&D improving, I really don't think that had anything to do with their decision.
MelleAndKev 2 years ago
I really appreciate this video and the debate at hand. If there ever was an Olympics where two golds should have been awarded this one is the one. While I adore G&G and believe they were technically superior, I believe that M&D were artistically superior. But really, I don't think there is anyone who would wish ill will on G&G--they were universally cherished. Someone had to win and it was a great, memorable, well-fought battle for the ages.
bunnyrabbit9999 2 years ago 18
what is the name of this song? it's been stuck in my head since i first saw this video!
mfelix87 2 years ago
Hi,
the song is called "the a' la menthe".
nephertiti77 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
great video. i too believe that G&G deserved to win the gold 100%.
and on another note, based on this "I-ibralady1010" vs "libralady1010," this g&g m&d fight is getting out of control. I may not agree with the original libralady1010 about m&d, but I-ibralady1010 has gone overboard with this fake posts. not cool at all.
mfelix87 2 years ago
Comment removed
libralady1010 2 years ago
Comment removed
libralady1010 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
6:27 and 6:30 tell the whole story, folks. !! "G&G's lift was fast, high and clean"...
So true, SO TRUE. This video just gives me a whole new appreciation for G&G and ONCE AGAIN, confirms why they won in Lillehammer. OMG, this video is just sublime. S-U-B-L-I-M-E. 5 Stars.
IibraIady1010 2 years ago 16
Comment removed
libralady1010 2 years ago
Hi everyone, just to let you know that although it looks like we have two libralady1010, the one pro G&G it's spelt with capital "i", and should not be confused with libralady1010 who favours M&D. if you want to know who is who, just click on their usernames. And pls stop flagging down libralady1010 pro M&D. thank you
nephertiti77 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thank YOU nepheriti77 for clarifying the situation. My heart goes out to you and my apologies to you as well. Everyone knows what's what &who's who now. I-ibralady 1010 is pitiful. Those red flags actually make it look like the holidays(!) together with the green! Cheers nephertiti77 ;-)
LovelySouthStar 2 years ago
Hi liberlady1010 - Nephertiti's reputation is not on the line in this instant as it's not her problem if someone has chosen to have a user name similar to yours - there are loads of usernames which are similar on youtube, and indeed all over the internet. I wouldn't worry about what others write. As nephertiti said above, if they click on each profile, they will see it's a different account. If you happen to get negative messages regarding someone else's comments, just explain that it's not you.
Apollo2077 2 years ago
Comment removed
libralady1010 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Getting to you is it " Thing?" A clown...you can join the circus. 6 redflags in 13 minutes. That's close to a record even for your pitiful person.
libralady1010 2 years ago
Comment removed
libralady1010 2 years ago
Comment removed
Piccolopiero 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Piccolopiero, I totally back up with you on this matter. Such things are unacceptable. Whoever has hacked Libralady's account must watch this video once again to remember that "Our honor is our honesty" (Sergey Grinkov)
oravaskvirel 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I am visiting my parents. My Mother did NOT write those glowing posts of G&G.
All of you-ok,cl-u like them. she respts
them,likes M&D better.
LovelySouthStar 2 years ago
Comment removed
libralady1010 2 years ago
libra, which one are the post you didn't write?
nephertiti77 2 years ago
Comment removed
libralady1010 2 years ago
Comment removed
libralady1010 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THANK YOU! Finally, someone has made a video showing why G&G won.
stanhope84 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Once again, nephertiti77, you have done a PERFECT job with this video illustrating why G&G were/are still remembered as one of the greatest pairs skaters ever. Easily trumps M&D. Must be why 8 of the 9 judges placed G&G 1st. What the hell was the other judge thinking? LOL!
IibraIady1010 2 years ago 7
Hi Libra, and thank you for your nice comments. I must say that yesterday I couldn't post a comment with the full name of TA1996, this system must have very powerful filters.
nephertiti77 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
G&G were the best here. And all this time i thought M&D were the true champions. Thank-you for this in-depth analysis- just again proves G&G are far superior by step, presentation, partner, finesse.
IibraIady1010 2 years ago 24
This has been flagged as spam show
I DID NOT post these comments! How do I know? BECAUSE I CANNOT DELETE THEM! If one cannot agree to disagree because Skating has always been about personal preference then maybe I don't want to discourse on it anymore. I'm asking you: TAKE THEM DOWN! I did not write them!
libralady1010 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Please everyone...I am surprised and sad at what happened to our yt friend and all the videos a few days ago. Think everyone knows whom I am speaking of. I hope this comes to a satisfactory resolution very soon. He is a true fan of Skating w/an awesome collection. Why the powers that be are suddenly doing this-don't know. He only does this strictly as a fan of Skating. Some prefer chocolate,some vanilla.
libralady1010 2 years ago
Hi,
I'm actually chatting with him right now. I'm very upset about it myself!!!!
nephertiti77 2 years ago
Comment removed
libralady1010 2 years ago
and by the way, he thanx everyone for the good thoughts
nephertiti77 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What an intelligently made video. Good job. G&G=G.O.A.T.-Greatest Of All Time. R.I.P. Sergei.
tvfanatic14 2 years ago
Hatula, they are not your favourite skaters, ok. But we are talking about Lillehammer, and Nephertiti has given a CLEAR technical analysis of the two programs, and you should just bow to the facts: they deserved the gold medal.
Piccolopiero 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is not the technical analysis by any means- this is a tribute to G&G made by their fan.
Had it been the technical analysis we would see all the elements of each pair with UNBIASED and PROFESSIONAL conclusions. This montage shows only the elements the author had chosen to show, and very biased and sometimes just wrong commentaries as a conclusion.
hatula87 2 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
Let's take for an example the step seq- we would see the step seq of each pair with a commentary of "M&D had the most difficult and interesting step seq in pairs but it had a unison brake for a second. G&G had the simpliest step seq but it was clean". We would also see M&D's perfect sbs 3 toes, G&G unison breaks on sbs spins in both programs etc.
hatula87 2 years ago 11
M&D did a simple sit spin into a standing up spin. G&G did a flying camels into a back sit spins into a single loop into a sit position-back sit spins for a total of 15 rotations against the 9 of M&D. They lost and regain the unison only on the last few rotations, coming out of it in perfect unison.
nephertiti77 2 years ago
Well, G&G didnt really have a simple step sequence. It was done by holding hands and a great speed which meant that if one of them tripped on the ice, the other one would be dragged down as well.
nephertiti77 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So, you don't trust a person who has a lot of experience in figure skating....you don't trust the olympic judges.......you don't trust the sport commentators....well, I guess there's nothing else I can do to show you what's absolutely clear..... :)
Piccolopiero 2 years ago
hatula87 G&G had convinced the word that they were great. I merely put that on a video montage.
But unfortunately, to highlight their greatness 10 minutes are not enough...
nephertiti77 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You are convinced that they were the "greatest ever", not the entire world.
G&G were just an improved version of Rodnina&Zaitzev, Pershina&Akbarov, Cherkasova&Shachray and many others Zhuk's pairs- technically strong (except for the jumps), but absolutely lacking inviduality, choreography and interpretation.
So if think they were great, many other people think different.
hatula87 2 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
This montage is an incredible example of an comletely biased G&G fan, trying to convience the world how great G&G were.
How did you miss the fact that M&D had a perfect sbs 3toe? The fact that they had two triple throws to G&G one (and axel was flawed by the way). And G&G were original? Since when? They programs were painfully empty of any transition or choreography or interpretation in 1985-1990. And 1994 again was the same endless crossovers between the technical moves.
hatula87 2 years ago 9
Comment removed
libralady1010 2 years ago
Comment removed
IibraIady1010 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
THAT WAS FANTASTIC!!!!!! how did you get such awesome footage??
chicvirgo86 2 years ago
Lots of research my friend :)
nephertiti77 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
indeed, if nattalia had so much flexibility, how come m&d could never do a good death spiral? even kazakova herself had problems with the BODS despite her flexibility
zilam98 2 years ago
Actually, this video has helped me to spot same "trademark" inferiority skating with all Moskvina's students: even Berezhnaya&Sikharulidze who were claimed to be "a perfect blend of G&G and M&D" had same problems with spirals, stopping before throws and probably something else.
oravaskvirel 2 years ago
B&S had the best spirals ever among pairs, better than G&G and they had the best entry into throws- first they did a perfect pair spiral all rink lenght and without losing ANY speed they immidiately entered the throw. No other pair was/is able of performing such a move.
hatula87 2 years ago 16
This has been flagged as spam show
and why katia could never do a good split in"split twist" - being so elegant and having such an ugly air position on this one?
hatula87 2 years ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I have to say that split position in the air was not very attractive. Zhuk also coached Stanislav Leonivich who had a tiny partner @ the 1980 Games. He was G&G's first coach. I know he was in Cinncinati w/them in 1987 as I saw them at the Skaters' Market and in Halifax in 1990.
libralady1010 2 years ago
May I correct you? Stanislav Leonovich was G&G's second coach. Zhuk was first. They left him for Leonovich because of the difficult personality and drinking habits of Zhuk...
oravaskvirel 2 years ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I mis-spoke. Zhuk was Leonovich's coach while he was skating. I know Zhuk was Rodnina's coach for a time until she/they left him for Tarasova before the 1976 Olympics. You have to understand:-we had very limited information for a long time. The federations-like federations all over the world, only tell what they want you to know.
libralady1010 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Kaz never had the flexibility of Natalia. She was limber-no argument there but Natalia was in a class by herself when it came to flexiblity.
libralady1010 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yep, imagining M&D with gold and G&G with silver is totally ridiculous after this video. The situation now looks different from many aspects. Like before US judge was thought to be most biased, as he scored M&D with 5.6 and G&G with 5.8. Now he (or was it she?) appears to be both the most demanding and objective. Good for him/her!
oravaskvirel 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
more insight on why G&G were the best at what they did
xoJONAS90xo 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THANK YOU!!!! Not only a perfect visual explanation of the result of 1994, but also a lovely tribute to Katia & Sergei's talent. THANK YOU!!!
Lorax1994 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Jesus, thanks god there was somebody who took his/her time to make this video. Discussions are all well and good but now it is so clear. A mere textbook of figure skating. And in a perfect quality. Thank you!!!
oravaskvirel 2 years ago