If I saw this sick bitch she will wish I hadn't! I hope that someone gets to her in a real bad way.. I would happily do time to see this sick woman dead! She deserves nothing but hate mail and a long and agonising death for all the abuse and suffering deaths she has caused to innocent animals.. If she reads this she may brush it off with a wry smile.. But I am not going to be the one in fear of my life looking over my shoulder everyday!
She is a crazy, demented bitch! This is not art, this is an extreme display of animal cruelty and murder and this mental case who craves attention must be stopped. I hope she gets what she has coming to her.
@josefabada Tu punto de vista es incongruente, hipócrita, y falaz. La gente como ella suele pensar antes de hablar,; intenta hacer lo mismo la próxima vez.
@ BeatleSoph are you fucking kidding me??? Art you call it??? You are as mental as her. "NOTHING DIFFERNET"???? You can not really mean that??? maybe she should kill you and use you as Art, dress you up and carry you around. Dont compare people who eat meat too people who kill animals and call it Art. I do not eat meat and I am offended that you would say that there is nothing different. You are a tool and with people like you and her in this life no animal is safe. You disgust me!
@Shaprilleigh okay, so you don't eat meat. do you wear leather? or someone you know? think about it. the cow that died for that leather lived a miserable life and existed only to be slaughtered, for profit, because that's what humans do with animals. we all know this when we see a leather item, but as long as we are not confronted with it directly, we ignore it. the cat killed by tinkebell was one animal which was sick anyway and which had a happy life. I seriously prefer that to factory-animals
I hope she is locked for animal cruelty because even if those animals were pressumably sick she has no right to kill them and make vanal things such as purses, or put them wheels, give an "artistic meaning" to that and be proud of it and actually think people is going to buy all the crap she says about thes "aertistic creations" of her...She's no artist, she's a MURDERER. And yes people need proteins but hey thre's soy, grains, even peauts have more proteins than meat.
@josefabada Bajo tu criterio, ¿es moralmente menos reprobable asesinar a puñetazos a una mujer en la calle y luego desmembrarla, que eutanasiar a animales enfermos o que de todos modos estaban destinados a morir? Me parece que quien amenaza de muerte a una persona como tu lo haces está mucho mas enferma que la persona a quien criticas ¿no crees? Congruencia.
@Cruz040488 no pues como te parece que asesinar a esta loca seria lo menos cruel que puede hacerse en el mundo, una persona tan demente como esta que disfruta ver morir animales solamente por ver crecer su arte, ella esta enferma y como bien lo dijo en su entrevista estan enfermos y tenian que morir de todos modos... entonces por que no hacerle lo mismo a ella si esta enferma y de todos modos se va a morir
For moral reasons I do not consume animals. I view them the same as ppl and quite frankly enjoy their presence over a humans. Animals are no properly respected by our society and I believe what Tinkbell is doing will help open some eyes.
to everyone saying she is cruel because she kills animals: you people who eat meat do NOTHING DIFFERENT. just because you are not all killing the animals yourself does not mean you are innocent, animals are killed FOR YOU in gruesome ways and people have a double standard in which all animals who are cute and cuddly and clean are allowed to live as pets and be treated really well, but those that taste good are tortured and killed and noone cares. tinkebell is just showing you that with her art.
@BeatleSoph Yes...but we need proteins. She just kill animals to make fucking purses. Are you really arguing with that bullshit perspective? I believe health/humanity comes before art, sorry. Why can't she grab a fucking pencil or and draw instead of killing animals for no damn reason?
@anatete1 because nobody listens to a drawing. you have to shock people, you have to rub it under their noses, really confront them, make sure they have to chance to look away. as for people needing proteins, what about people for example in india, who have never eaten meat in their life for religious reasons. are they weak? do they die? humans are perfectly capable of living without eating meat, they just want to believe that they need it because it's easier on their conscience.
@BeatleSoph Actually, people these days pay much attention to drawings/pieces of art. This is just a purse made out of a cat, seriously. Of course we're capable to live without eating meat, but we're all part of different cultures. Animals eat other animals too, do you bash them for that? Now, do they make purses out of each other? No. This woman is insane and you're just trying to come up with a reason to side with her.
@anatete1 in my experience people need to be shocked by something to even process it, to remember it later. and this works, you see, were are discussing it. we would not be discussing a drawing of a cat handbag. besides, I wasn't just referring to the handbag but to her work in general. it is about different norms people have in different cultures. killing animals is always bad, but at least her cat had a good life, unlike the animals who are usually tortured and killed for our fun/profit
@anatete1 as for animals also eating other animals, the difference is that humans are intelligent beings, aware of what they are doing and aware that, when one has other choices, one should choose not to kill. humans do not 'belong' to nature anymore, so human predators can not be compared to animal predators. when a lion kills a gazelle, at least it could live in freedom instead of being forcefed chemicals in a factory
Since when stuffing corpses is considered an art? I assume stuffing a dead human being, dressing it ridiculously or making purses and collars out of it's skin and body parts is an art for you... or are you going to tell me "animals are not equal to human beings"? And pointing out the meat-eating cruelty with messed up ideas is not a fair statement... way too subjective from her part. It's common sense, just think about having a purse made with a freaking cat?! It's not natural!!!
@Flangerus you and I can not determine what art is. I think art can be anything if it makes a statement, is meaningful in some way and forces people to think about something they usually do not think about. and yes, if a human consented to be made into a handbag after he dies, why should that not happen? because somebody else thinks it is strange? I think it is strange that everyone considers it normal that animals are a product.
Yeah, art does not have a specific definition. Even bullfighting is considered an art, oh the humanity... and exactly, Katinka watches this animals as products (she takes them to exhibitions and she also puts wheels and radio control devices inside them [WTF] ). And yes, people needs shocking publicity to understand what is really happening on the planet, but in this case you can't fight fire with fire... exactly what Katinka does.
@BeatleSoph No es lo mismo. Además, todos los animales matan para comer y sovrevivir. Nosotros somos animales. Pero, ¿matar para "entretener"? Eso no es correcto. Creo ke sería más feo encontrar a una persona ke mate personas para hacer "arte" ke encontrar a un antropófago. Las necesidades son distintas. Una es necesidad para la supervivencia y la otra, no tiene nomvre. Si alguien puede traducírselo a esta persona en inglés, sería mejor (:
@shanoa19 if anyone could translate this fully, I'd appreciate it. I think I understood most of what you wanted to say, though. It is true that all animals kill to eat and survive. But the difference is that humans do not need to kill in order to survive, They do it only because they want to eat meat. They know it is wrong, and they have alternatives, but they choose to kill anyway.
You say Tinkebell kills for entertainment, well, that may be your viewpoint. I think she does it so send a message
@BeatleSoph you are right but there are some limits... the big problem about this artistic work its not to show dead animals to protest, i am ok with that, the problem its the fact she kill them herself ! killing in the name of art? you have to kill a human and expose his body as a trophy to show another human is not good to kill? the difference between an artist and a murderer is that the artist never pass to act and this girl did it, so there she is not more a artist she is a killer
ok I'm an "artist" and before to know it was she who killed the animals, I thought it was a good way to protest against animal abuse, the problem is that when I found out that it was she who killed the animals to make her own works i change my mind. killing in the name of art? is that normal? so you can kill a human and expose his body to show to another human is not good to kill? the difference between an artist and a murderer is that the artist never pass to act and she is a killer for me now
@MsYepar yes, I saw it that way too at first, and of course it's your right to think that. everyone has different limits. but I think what she does is only a reflection of the society we live in, and it is effective, because she pulls our strings. I don't think killing to make a statement is worse than killing to eat a burger.
@BeatleSoph This lady does not kill animals in a humanly way, she has put chicks through a shredder!!!! How is that humanly? We kill for meat but that is a part of living, those cows and pigs are killed so we can eat then leather is used for materials. How can you stick up for this woman after she killed her own cat and made it into a handbag? She killed a Dalmatian that was probably a pet and put it in a gallery. Cows and pigs that are bread for dying do not know the difference! your both sick!
@laurenhancy1987 Killing animals is not a part of life! You don´t kill your "food"! You need someone else to do it! Animals that eat meat kill them themselfs and eat the meat rare! Not nicely cooked with condiments! And using leather it's exactly the same as she does using her cat to make a handbag! Open your eyes because you're a part of the problem too!
@yrenevendetta You said it! As soon as I was ever exposed to what happens in factory farms I went vegetarian instantly. All it took is photos of chicks having their beaks clipped off and pigs having teeth pulled out. That was all it took for me. I grew up without making the link because it is so socially acceptable to eat meat you just don't get taught where it is from.
@laurenhancy1987 She did not put the chickens through a shredder, but indeed, she was going to if nobody would save the chickens. But then someone stole the shredder and she threatened to throw the chickens to a wall. So they might get killed. But the organisation, wouldn't be responsible for the death of the chickens, so they decided to buy the chickens (that's what Tinkebell wanted: the chickens were saved).
@Geertruidaa I understand why she did that!! People are so fucking ignorant they don't even know how much suffering goes on behind their packets of nicely displayed eggs. What about peoples pets that they dump in pounds? What do they think happens to them! If no one takes them THEY DIE!! If another rescue doesn't take them THEY DIE! I have been part of an animal rescue and have made decisions myself on taking them but have never had to make the life or death one as a foster carer.
@laurenhancy1987 (Ran out of characters ;p) But what you say: We kill for meat but that's a part of living. I completely agree with you!
I think its not normal and respectful to reuse creatures, like animals but humans too, to create products and toys. That's what she is doing.
Gunther von Hagens does the same, than actually.. He uses bodies for expositions. But it might be so that some persons wanted to be exposed when they were dead.
@BeatleSoph She is not being a solution to the problem. This is not art. She should go to a mental institution. It's like fighting child abuse by beating your own children.
@BeatleSoph people eat animals to survive. If she tortures animals she does it to be famous. I wonder how she will react if one day she meets someone who will do with her everything she does with those poor animals.
@ladygagaispureshit I survive perfectly well without eating animals, as do millions of other people. and I'm pretty sure she's not doing it for fame, she has a message. if she just wanted to be famous, she wouldn't make art, she'd post youtube videos of herself getting undressed or something.
@BeatleSoph I am not vegan but I respect vegans' ideas so as I firmly believe that many people can not live in good health without eating animal proteins. Tinkbeamonster only prides herself thinking to be able to teach something to somebodyelse, also because she does it in the worst way. There's no difference between her and a serial killer. She needs a good psychiatrist.
@BeatleSoph I agree. I am also in the position to say people who eat meat are massive hypocrites! I am not because I am almost vegan (I avoid any dairy or egg products but am not perfect) and I know a lot about the meat and animal industries, including pets. I was quick to judge after seeing a brief article with her dog/cat bag and was horrified but after more research I understand what she is doing. People are so ignorant and they like being that way.
well she could find other million of ways to do art and express the concept. To bring our attention on the fact that animal are cruelly and unjustly killed every day she kills other innocent animals..........Does it make sense?
@BeatleSoph finally someone who has internet and can read and does not just look at the hate she gets. i bet 75% of people who "hate" her aren't even vegan, neither vegetarians. i hope more people would understand her and you!! :(
Eres una pinche vieja puta! como te atreves a hacerle eso a las pieles de los animales... ojala y te hagan lo mismo, perra enferma! púdrete en el infierno! los gusanos se sentirían enfermos de están en tu hórrido cadáver... tu alma esta mas que podrida, solo eres una vieja pendeja que sigue las modas... me das lastima, espero verte en el infierno, me encargare personalmente de torturarte, bien te lo mereces. pd: me caga verte con tu pinche ropa rosa, solo haces remarcar lo vació de tu cerebro!
@GAROUNIGHTWOLF Es una propuesta artística y está pensada con un propósito. La ropa rosa (reflejando inocencia y superficialidad) es a drede. Su cerebro tiene todo menos vacuidad.
C'est une meurtière qui tue des animaux et s'amuse à les depecer et les transformé en "art" pour des photos qui sont censé denoncer l'état de commercialisation des animaux de nos jours.
C'est honteux elle prétend défendre l'image de l'animal en l'utilisant de façon barbare,choquantes et TOTALEMENT indigne pour l'animal !!!!
Goed idee en performance. Vraag mij alleen erg af of de mensen niet alleen geshocked zijn en er verder niet over gaan nadenken. Merkte je uit de reactie dat het aan denken zette?
Ik blijf het, hoe goed je werk ook is, het krom vinden om zelf dieren te gebruiken als je dierenmis/gebruik kritiek op hebt.
Groet van een niet dier hebbende en veganistisch levende
die bitch.
CelineAnna13 2 weeks ago
this is so fucking insane!!!!!
andracarflorelma1 3 weeks ago
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ritavegan 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
If I saw this sick bitch she will wish I hadn't! I hope that someone gets to her in a real bad way.. I would happily do time to see this sick woman dead! She deserves nothing but hate mail and a long and agonising death for all the abuse and suffering deaths she has caused to innocent animals.. If she reads this she may brush it off with a wry smile.. But I am not going to be the one in fear of my life looking over my shoulder everyday!
tsia1234 1 month ago 2
She is a crazy, demented bitch! This is not art, this is an extreme display of animal cruelty and murder and this mental case who craves attention must be stopped. I hope she gets what she has coming to her.
twbr1991 1 month ago 2
SALOPE!!!!
Jessicology 2 months ago
Comment removed
reblfleur08 2 months ago
Complètement d'accord avec Dawaddicted !
Tribute2girl 2 months ago
FAut la denoncer aux associations de protection des animaux au max
MultiSheim 2 months ago
Ha ancora sul muso l'espressione di dolore. Mi fai schifo.
jhonjusper 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
siento pena todo lo ke viviras oooooooooo
yasodita 4 months ago
Pourquoi ne pas faire cela avec de la FAUSSE fourrure, ou simplement une IMITATION d'animal ?
chihuahua3422 5 months ago
Oui, nous mangeons des animaux mais c'est la chaîne alimentaire, ils ne servent pas à faire de ''l'art''...
chihuahua3422 5 months ago
Haha she is damn ugly.
fussballer7 5 months ago
And you think you the difference or your cruel actions are justified?That is cruelty you look where you look, hopefully you have animals ban soon
mayirachida 7 months ago
@josefabada ¡Bravo! ¡Tú sola te habeis contestado! Nuevamente coincido contigo. Vaya, eres mas lista de lo que creí.
Cruz040488 7 months ago
@josefabada Coincido y ella también. ¡Ya entendiste algo!
Cruz040488 7 months ago
@josefabada Tu punto de vista es incongruente, hipócrita, y falaz. La gente como ella suele pensar antes de hablar,; intenta hacer lo mismo la próxima vez.
Cruz040488 7 months ago
@ BeatleSoph are you fucking kidding me??? Art you call it??? You are as mental as her. "NOTHING DIFFERNET"???? You can not really mean that??? maybe she should kill you and use you as Art, dress you up and carry you around. Dont compare people who eat meat too people who kill animals and call it Art. I do not eat meat and I am offended that you would say that there is nothing different. You are a tool and with people like you and her in this life no animal is safe. You disgust me!
Shaprilleigh 7 months ago
@Shaprilleigh okay, so you don't eat meat. do you wear leather? or someone you know? think about it. the cow that died for that leather lived a miserable life and existed only to be slaughtered, for profit, because that's what humans do with animals. we all know this when we see a leather item, but as long as we are not confronted with it directly, we ignore it. the cat killed by tinkebell was one animal which was sick anyway and which had a happy life. I seriously prefer that to factory-animals
BeatleSoph 7 months ago
Comment removed
Shaprilleigh 7 months ago
You`re Shit!!
GreedyBitchTv 7 months ago
I hope she is locked for animal cruelty because even if those animals were pressumably sick she has no right to kill them and make vanal things such as purses, or put them wheels, give an "artistic meaning" to that and be proud of it and actually think people is going to buy all the crap she says about thes "aertistic creations" of her...She's no artist, she's a MURDERER. And yes people need proteins but hey thre's soy, grains, even peauts have more proteins than meat.
TsubakiRan 7 months ago
@josefabada Bajo tu criterio, ¿es moralmente menos reprobable asesinar a puñetazos a una mujer en la calle y luego desmembrarla, que eutanasiar a animales enfermos o que de todos modos estaban destinados a morir? Me parece que quien amenaza de muerte a una persona como tu lo haces está mucho mas enferma que la persona a quien criticas ¿no crees? Congruencia.
Cruz040488 7 months ago
@Cruz040488 no pues como te parece que asesinar a esta loca seria lo menos cruel que puede hacerse en el mundo, una persona tan demente como esta que disfruta ver morir animales solamente por ver crecer su arte, ella esta enferma y como bien lo dijo en su entrevista estan enfermos y tenian que morir de todos modos... entonces por que no hacerle lo mismo a ella si esta enferma y de todos modos se va a morir
katherin1986 7 months ago
@katherin1986 Si te cuestionas eso es porque tu brújula moral está diametralmente perdida.
Cruz040488 7 months ago
I HOPE YOU FUCKING DIE SOON BITCH
Danielita90 7 months ago
Je bent een ellendeling moet in de gevangenis te worden voor het bevorderen van dierenmishandeling
danisol32 7 months ago
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY SICK
amymhis 7 months ago
For moral reasons I do not consume animals. I view them the same as ppl and quite frankly enjoy their presence over a humans. Animals are no properly respected by our society and I believe what Tinkbell is doing will help open some eyes.
meliquoi 7 months ago
to everyone saying she is cruel because she kills animals: you people who eat meat do NOTHING DIFFERENT. just because you are not all killing the animals yourself does not mean you are innocent, animals are killed FOR YOU in gruesome ways and people have a double standard in which all animals who are cute and cuddly and clean are allowed to live as pets and be treated really well, but those that taste good are tortured and killed and noone cares. tinkebell is just showing you that with her art.
BeatleSoph 7 months ago 7
@BeatleSoph Many of us don't eat meat..SO YOUR ARGUMENT IS INVALID... zing
Danielita90 7 months ago
@Danielita90 well, that depends who you mean by 'us'. The population in general? Vegetarians are a minority.
BeatleSoph 7 months ago
@BeatleSoph Yes...but we need proteins. She just kill animals to make fucking purses. Are you really arguing with that bullshit perspective? I believe health/humanity comes before art, sorry. Why can't she grab a fucking pencil or and draw instead of killing animals for no damn reason?
anatete1 7 months ago
@anatete1 because nobody listens to a drawing. you have to shock people, you have to rub it under their noses, really confront them, make sure they have to chance to look away. as for people needing proteins, what about people for example in india, who have never eaten meat in their life for religious reasons. are they weak? do they die? humans are perfectly capable of living without eating meat, they just want to believe that they need it because it's easier on their conscience.
BeatleSoph 7 months ago
@BeatleSoph Actually, people these days pay much attention to drawings/pieces of art. This is just a purse made out of a cat, seriously. Of course we're capable to live without eating meat, but we're all part of different cultures. Animals eat other animals too, do you bash them for that? Now, do they make purses out of each other? No. This woman is insane and you're just trying to come up with a reason to side with her.
anatete1 7 months ago
@anatete1 in my experience people need to be shocked by something to even process it, to remember it later. and this works, you see, were are discussing it. we would not be discussing a drawing of a cat handbag. besides, I wasn't just referring to the handbag but to her work in general. it is about different norms people have in different cultures. killing animals is always bad, but at least her cat had a good life, unlike the animals who are usually tortured and killed for our fun/profit
BeatleSoph 7 months ago
@anatete1 as for animals also eating other animals, the difference is that humans are intelligent beings, aware of what they are doing and aware that, when one has other choices, one should choose not to kill. humans do not 'belong' to nature anymore, so human predators can not be compared to animal predators. when a lion kills a gazelle, at least it could live in freedom instead of being forcefed chemicals in a factory
BeatleSoph 7 months ago
@BeatleSoph
Since when stuffing corpses is considered an art? I assume stuffing a dead human being, dressing it ridiculously or making purses and collars out of it's skin and body parts is an art for you... or are you going to tell me "animals are not equal to human beings"? And pointing out the meat-eating cruelty with messed up ideas is not a fair statement... way too subjective from her part. It's common sense, just think about having a purse made with a freaking cat?! It's not natural!!!
Flangerus 7 months ago
@Flangerus you and I can not determine what art is. I think art can be anything if it makes a statement, is meaningful in some way and forces people to think about something they usually do not think about. and yes, if a human consented to be made into a handbag after he dies, why should that not happen? because somebody else thinks it is strange? I think it is strange that everyone considers it normal that animals are a product.
BeatleSoph 7 months ago
@BeatleSoph
Yeah, art does not have a specific definition. Even bullfighting is considered an art, oh the humanity... and exactly, Katinka watches this animals as products (she takes them to exhibitions and she also puts wheels and radio control devices inside them [WTF] ). And yes, people needs shocking publicity to understand what is really happening on the planet, but in this case you can't fight fire with fire... exactly what Katinka does.
Flangerus 7 months ago
@BeatleSoph No es lo mismo. Además, todos los animales matan para comer y sovrevivir. Nosotros somos animales. Pero, ¿matar para "entretener"? Eso no es correcto. Creo ke sería más feo encontrar a una persona ke mate personas para hacer "arte" ke encontrar a un antropófago. Las necesidades son distintas. Una es necesidad para la supervivencia y la otra, no tiene nomvre. Si alguien puede traducírselo a esta persona en inglés, sería mejor (:
shanoa19 7 months ago
@shanoa19 if anyone could translate this fully, I'd appreciate it. I think I understood most of what you wanted to say, though. It is true that all animals kill to eat and survive. But the difference is that humans do not need to kill in order to survive, They do it only because they want to eat meat. They know it is wrong, and they have alternatives, but they choose to kill anyway.
You say Tinkebell kills for entertainment, well, that may be your viewpoint. I think she does it so send a message
BeatleSoph 7 months ago
@BeatleSoph you are right but there are some limits... the big problem about this artistic work its not to show dead animals to protest, i am ok with that, the problem its the fact she kill them herself ! killing in the name of art? you have to kill a human and expose his body as a trophy to show another human is not good to kill? the difference between an artist and a murderer is that the artist never pass to act and this girl did it, so there she is not more a artist she is a killer
MsYepar 7 months ago 2
ok I'm an "artist" and before to know it was she who killed the animals, I thought it was a good way to protest against animal abuse, the problem is that when I found out that it was she who killed the animals to make her own works i change my mind. killing in the name of art? is that normal? so you can kill a human and expose his body to show to another human is not good to kill? the difference between an artist and a murderer is that the artist never pass to act and she is a killer for me now
MsYepar 7 months ago
@MsYepar yes, I saw it that way too at first, and of course it's your right to think that. everyone has different limits. but I think what she does is only a reflection of the society we live in, and it is effective, because she pulls our strings. I don't think killing to make a statement is worse than killing to eat a burger.
BeatleSoph 7 months ago
@BeatleSoph This lady does not kill animals in a humanly way, she has put chicks through a shredder!!!! How is that humanly? We kill for meat but that is a part of living, those cows and pigs are killed so we can eat then leather is used for materials. How can you stick up for this woman after she killed her own cat and made it into a handbag? She killed a Dalmatian that was probably a pet and put it in a gallery. Cows and pigs that are bread for dying do not know the difference! your both sick!
laurenhancy1987 6 months ago
@laurenhancy1987 Killing animals is not a part of life! You don´t kill your "food"! You need someone else to do it! Animals that eat meat kill them themselfs and eat the meat rare! Not nicely cooked with condiments! And using leather it's exactly the same as she does using her cat to make a handbag! Open your eyes because you're a part of the problem too!
yrenevendetta 5 months ago 2
@yrenevendetta You said it! As soon as I was ever exposed to what happens in factory farms I went vegetarian instantly. All it took is photos of chicks having their beaks clipped off and pigs having teeth pulled out. That was all it took for me. I grew up without making the link because it is so socially acceptable to eat meat you just don't get taught where it is from.
missprincessfifi 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos 2
@laurenhancy1987 She did not put the chickens through a shredder, but indeed, she was going to if nobody would save the chickens. But then someone stole the shredder and she threatened to throw the chickens to a wall. So they might get killed. But the organisation, wouldn't be responsible for the death of the chickens, so they decided to buy the chickens (that's what Tinkebell wanted: the chickens were saved).
Geertruidaa 2 months ago
@Geertruidaa I understand why she did that!! People are so fucking ignorant they don't even know how much suffering goes on behind their packets of nicely displayed eggs. What about peoples pets that they dump in pounds? What do they think happens to them! If no one takes them THEY DIE!! If another rescue doesn't take them THEY DIE! I have been part of an animal rescue and have made decisions myself on taking them but have never had to make the life or death one as a foster carer.
missprincessfifi 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@laurenhancy1987 (Ran out of characters ;p) But what you say: We kill for meat but that's a part of living. I completely agree with you!
I think its not normal and respectful to reuse creatures, like animals but humans too, to create products and toys. That's what she is doing.
Gunther von Hagens does the same, than actually.. He uses bodies for expositions. But it might be so that some persons wanted to be exposed when they were dead.
It's so controversial.
Geertruidaa 2 months ago
@BeatleSoph She is not being a solution to the problem. This is not art. She should go to a mental institution. It's like fighting child abuse by beating your own children.
Lynarette 6 months ago 3
@BeatleSoph people eat animals to survive. If she tortures animals she does it to be famous. I wonder how she will react if one day she meets someone who will do with her everything she does with those poor animals.
ladygagaispureshit 3 months ago
@ladygagaispureshit I survive perfectly well without eating animals, as do millions of other people. and I'm pretty sure she's not doing it for fame, she has a message. if she just wanted to be famous, she wouldn't make art, she'd post youtube videos of herself getting undressed or something.
BeatleSoph 3 months ago
@BeatleSoph I am not vegan but I respect vegans' ideas so as I firmly believe that many people can not live in good health without eating animal proteins. Tinkbeamonster only prides herself thinking to be able to teach something to somebodyelse, also because she does it in the worst way. There's no difference between her and a serial killer. She needs a good psychiatrist.
ladygagaispureshit 3 months ago
@BeatleSoph I agree. I am also in the position to say people who eat meat are massive hypocrites! I am not because I am almost vegan (I avoid any dairy or egg products but am not perfect) and I know a lot about the meat and animal industries, including pets. I was quick to judge after seeing a brief article with her dog/cat bag and was horrified but after more research I understand what she is doing. People are so ignorant and they like being that way.
missprincessfifi 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
well she could find other million of ways to do art and express the concept. To bring our attention on the fact that animal are cruelly and unjustly killed every day she kills other innocent animals..........Does it make sense?
cybernella23 1 month ago 2
@BeatleSoph humans are animals,mammals,and since the world is world,animals eat other animals.
then there are pets.
valeagathon 2 months ago
@BeatleSoph finally someone who has internet and can read and does not just look at the hate she gets. i bet 75% of people who "hate" her aren't even vegan, neither vegetarians. i hope more people would understand her and you!! :(
annyyyWTF 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
smerig wijf,
met al je dode dieren.
heb is respect, je gaat tog niet fucking liegen met een interview?
Gienzelientje8875 8 months ago
GOTVERDOMME HEB JE WEER ZO EEN KUT ALS JIJ
Gienzelientje8875 8 months ago
NASTY SICK BITCH, SHE NEEDS TO BE KILLED. NO THAT WOULD BE TO NICE, SHE SHOULD BE KILLED AND MADE A HAND BAG.
TheChampagne1998 8 months ago
Eres una pinche vieja puta! como te atreves a hacerle eso a las pieles de los animales... ojala y te hagan lo mismo, perra enferma! púdrete en el infierno! los gusanos se sentirían enfermos de están en tu hórrido cadáver... tu alma esta mas que podrida, solo eres una vieja pendeja que sigue las modas... me das lastima, espero verte en el infierno, me encargare personalmente de torturarte, bien te lo mereces. pd: me caga verte con tu pinche ropa rosa, solo haces remarcar lo vació de tu cerebro!
GAROUNIGHTWOLF 8 months ago
@GAROUNIGHTWOLF Es una propuesta artística y está pensada con un propósito. La ropa rosa (reflejando inocencia y superficialidad) es a drede. Su cerebro tiene todo menos vacuidad.
Cruz040488 8 months ago
PUTTANA
mauztv 1 year ago
pauvre folle !!
jianamaya 1 year ago
En prison Tinker Bell !!!!!!!
C'est une meurtière qui tue des animaux et s'amuse à les depecer et les transformé en "art" pour des photos qui sont censé denoncer l'état de commercialisation des animaux de nos jours.
C'est honteux elle prétend défendre l'image de l'animal en l'utilisant de façon barbare,choquantes et TOTALEMENT indigne pour l'animal !!!!
Dawaddicted 1 year ago 9
Goed idee en performance. Vraag mij alleen erg af of de mensen niet alleen geshocked zijn en er verder niet over gaan nadenken. Merkte je uit de reactie dat het aan denken zette?
Ik blijf het, hoe goed je werk ook is, het krom vinden om zelf dieren te gebruiken als je dierenmis/gebruik kritiek op hebt.
Groet van een niet dier hebbende en veganistisch levende
vivianerose 2 years ago 2
this video is mesmerizing
tsfreh 2 years ago
I love you
s14sher 2 years ago
@s14sher Are You Nuts?
GAROUNIGHTWOLF 8 months ago