@YouGotWoodRolled thats funny dude so then there are alot of crazies out there unaware they are crazy.I must be crazy but it takes more then one person to determine if i am it only takes me to know if i have a disease.So anyone can diagnose disease but a doctor has to diagnose you mentally unstable.CONTROL is what that is a way to discredit and imprison someone.What is CRAZY im going crazy right now i think oh well 9 eleven was a satanic ritual false flag operation INSIDE JOB cheers buddy
@YouGotWoodRolled It just sounds crazy the people who think this is true are not crazy.The media are involved in the deception of 9 eleven they are actors.The military are 25 - 50 years ahead of what we know and buddy call me crazy because i have personally seen a plane vanish when i was observing chemtrails Nov.2.2011 Tor, Canada.To all the victims of the 9 eleven mega satanic ritual and sacrifice, all the millions who died in wars since Bush conquered Iraq and Afghanistan.RIP be with God
September Clues does not prove that there were no planes in New York, but there will always be those who believe what they are told, because it means that they don’t have to think for themselves.
Simon Shack's videos are full of innuendo, with nothing to back up the conclusions he reaches. The so called Nose-in, Nose-out sequence is a shining example. He looks at one shot only, the Fox 5 helicopter shot and totally ignores the videos taken from the opposite side of the South Tower.
@alawson911 Anthony darling! Good to see you over here! So have you done some 9/11 research lately? What is it, now again, that "I totally ignore"? It seems to me that, in the course of the last 4 years, I (and my fellow researchers at cluesforum.info) have covered just about every possible aspect of 9/11. Could you kindly provide a link to your own body of research and evidence, so that we can confront our findings? Thanks very muchly, sweet Anthony!
The funny thing is you can prove this is a conspiracy like this video has and you will get a patriotic American that will say its bullshit and they will ridicule to the best of their ability.The evidence speaks for itself no more debates with blithering idiots they are the sheep cattle the elite believe they are and will never change until they are facing execution.
Dimitri Khalezov has come forward.... And he explains in detail what took place on that FUCKING jewish holiday.... Besides there were inside trades that lead up to the culprits.... And none of them lived in a cave in Afghanistan...
Wouldn't there be hundreds of videos of a missile hitting the second tower? I believe a lot of civilians would be filming the first tower that was just hit by a missile of its own. I should have seen some of those videos on youtube, right? I've never heard of conspiracy videos dissapearing from youtube. Sure, the towers were demolished, but missiles? Hmm...
While this is interesting, I am not convinced. A question to the people who believe the No-Planes theory: If you met someone on the street who says that they 100% certainly saw a plane(s) fly in the tower, would you be 100% convinced that he/she is lying? Same question goes for if the person said they knew someone who died in a plane/building.
@nlo13 Please google "letter from Torbjon cluesforum". You will find a page of my forum, scroll down to the 7th post and read the "Letter from Torbjon". After you have read it, ask yourself why Torbjon would possibly lie about his personal experience in Manhattan that morning. He heard or saw no airliner although he most certainly should have. You may also wish to enter my website "septemberclues.info) and read the page called "Visual control of 9/11"(and other interesting testimonies).
@nlo13 The problem with your theory is that no one has come forward to say they saw a plane. FOX Reporter Dick Oliver who was interviewing people on the streets that day reported this: "I don't know whether we have confirmed this to be an aircraft or to be more specific, some people said they thought they saw a missile...we might be open to the possibility that this was a missile attack on these buildings."
compare 1:53 in the video " The "Jumpers" of 9/11 are all FAKES?" with 7:30 in the video " 9-11 Photos The Networks Will NOT Show You!!! - Remembering The Jumpers"
Indeed! And there are countless such blatant forgeries to be found in the available 9/11 "jumper" imagery. On our discussion forum ( cluesforum.info ) we have analyzed and dissected virtually ALL the "jumper" imagery in every imaginable way:
tinyurl . com /FALLINGMANcf (remove all spaces)
The notion that "200 people jumped to their death" was scripted for shock-and-awe effect - and to convince the public that there were actually people inside the towers that morning.
@simonshack wait a minute are you saying there were no people in the towers that morning. what about all the relatives, who have been interviewed and they no people who died in the towers
@individuality1988 The people you've seen impersonating family members are all actors. Please watch "911 ACTORS" and meet a few of them:
watch?v=6aPvJSQtmoE
If you wish, we have tons of information at cluesforum.info gathered in the last few years which supports the working hypothesis that no one died on 9/11. The vast majority isn't even listed in the various official US/or New York death records. The 9/11 victims were, by and large, virtual identities.
Are we to take this question of yours as implying that you actually believe in the moon landings?
Are we also supposed to be lectured by you on the subject ? Lastly, are you by any chance one of those folks who go around telling people that "If you don't believe we actually went back and forth to the moon flawlessly six times between 1969 and 1972 - you are seriously retarded?"
I do hope all my questions adequately answered yours ;-)
@SuperAlexdunn You don't have to apologize for anything. The fact that you admitted you were wrong and accepted what SimonShack said shows that your intelligence is actually above the average individual.
The "2nd plane" was actually explosion from the inside. When I was actually watching live broadcast about the even on the CNN, after the building 7 collapsed. I realized immediately, that building 7 was clearly a demolition of the building. When G.Bush announced, that Al-Qaeda was responsible and exactly year after 9-11 announced, that US is going to invade Iraq, it was clear for me, that 9-11 was a false flag operation.
Are you guys all missing the point of this video. It is questioning what exactly hit the buildings. It is suggesting that it could have been a missile not a plane. It doesn't make any claims of the collapse, rather it shows the rapid pace at which the media try to confuse and convince you of the story "they want you to believe". A lot of you are questioning things that have no relevance to this film.
I absolutely agree what we saw on TV was faked. These planes supposedly flew, intact without breaking apart or crashing into, THROUGH and INTO the buildings before exploding! Yeah okay! Even when a plane crashes into a body of WATER it crashes, explodes and breaks apart on the surface! I guess I could throw a soda can through my front door if I throw it hard enough? lmao
are you saying that noone saw a plane that day approaching, flying low and making a loud noise. Surely people were watching the whole thing. I wanna believe it coz everything else you did seemed plausible. so nobody saw a plane from the streets or buildings?
I'll ask again a FOURTH TIME: which amateur video, showing planes hitting WTC, do you believe is not doctored, fabricated or composite? You have seen them all, no? They are part of your CONSPIRACY story, so it's YOU that needs to prove authenticity. Your EVIDENCE is now under examination, not YOUR VERSION of it. Pick one, numnuts. If your evidence is fraud, so is your whole fucking story. Or didn't they teach you that in public school? You gov't shills are not that bright.
"the burdon of proof is in the hands of anyone who thinks it was a conspiracy"
Astounding absurdity. Numnuts like you are laughable. Your logic is that the gov't CONSPIRACY story needs no proof (except for YOUR added proof), yet people who know damn well the story is a fraud now need to prove the story itself is a CONSPIRACY?
Is that you, GWB Jr.?
"it is up to you to prove that every video that shows the plane was faked"
I don't know what "truther" means, but your hypothesis of the angled entry of the pentagon plane is pure junk. No witness for this claim either. The same plane that hits the light post (with the shattered glass laying next to the pole?) flies just above the grass, then at the very last second goes into a 45 degree angle turn? How about selling me whatever it is you're on- I'd like a break from physics and reality for a bit.
After watch all the videos twice, it concerns me that this could affect the "controlled demolition" theory. Since there were supposedly no buildings. It's there a chance that fake footage could be mixed with some real footage that day? I mean, could be the collapses real but with fake layers and backgrouds to make it look the way they want it to? it was possible to generate a collapsing building in 2001 that looked so convincing?
All the footage of (the crucial events of) 9/11 was but a Hollywood production. What was shown on Live TV was a prefabricated movie. Think "Independence Day" (released in 1996): that movie showed all sorts of collapses, including the Empire State Building exploding - from top down (!) - just like the absurd WTC collapses seen on TV. The real collapses took place behind a smokescreen & were never captured on film. Please go to:
tinyurl . com / collapseanimations (remove all spaces)
@simonshack I know wat you mean. The thing is that I had watched some "footage" of september 11 that doesn't appear in this documentary or in your page. I don't want to assume that 100% of the videos are fake yet until I can watch more analysis. Also, even if there's no real footage of the buildings, looking at groud zero still suggest that they collapsed, since the adjacent buildings didn't have too much damage. Anyway, keep the good work. I'll be looking for more videos.
Great job Simon. Your "sure man's elbow" shot cracked up my 10 year old nephew. Even he can see and recognize the absolute absurdity of the video editing.
if the government was able to somehow fake the planes at the WTC on live t.v., other people's personal videos, and infront of the 1000's who witnessed it live at the scene, then how come they didn't edit a video at the pentagon with a plane using CGI? if they planned it out they could have had a video already edited and released it to the media moments after the pentagon was hit.
Your question and assertion reveals your lack of understanding of what the Pentagon is. Would you believe a passenger plane would pierce through that wall with no parts being obliterated and left on the exterior? Far few people would because that's just silly. Not only that, they haven't released ANY photo/video of this supposed plane. Why is that? Because there was no fucking plane. Personal videos? Which one do you think is a "personal" video? STFU with your idiocy, fool.
Just in case you're not crystal clear on your idiocy, you can choke on this Maxim of Law from Bouvier's 1856 Law Dictionary: Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat.
translation: The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies.
translation: You're the dipshit pimping the fascist State story (by which we've gone on invasion conquests and murdered hundreds of thousands - AGAIN), so it's YOU that has burden of PROOF, not conspiracy THEORY.
@stonecutter just ignore him stonecutter, not one debunker including LCE has ever said anything about this video /watch?v=BKb30oSwBzc that explains how it is wrong, it is narrated by the one guy who shuts down anyone who does not have their eyes open to the truth.
"And I would say, you know, approximately 10 minutes ago." (2:16)
The "you know" sounds like an amateur actresses trying to sound natural. But it's a little slip that sounds UNnatural. It sounds like she' discussing something she's familiar with, rehearsed, already long gone over. It's not how you talk about something new, amazing, or alarming. This Sayyanim was very nervous in her first acting job.
She's clearly making an effort, too, to set the thing up according to a scripted timeline.
Why did he call a woman in Chelsea to tell him what's happening in Manhattan? Because she's a Sayyanim wife of a Sayyanim producer. (Jewish "friends" of Israel) obviously. I looked up this woman, Theresa Renaud, on Google. Her face looks half Ashkenazi if not full Ashkenazi.
So the Sayyanim wife of the Sayyanim producer reacted to the explosion immediately "live" with B. Gumbel even though the sound would have taken 8 seconds to reach her in Chelsea? (3:00)
Smoking gun right there. Listen to her. (1:57) Notice how she adds "yes" after the line "east side of the building." Sounds like a woman unaccustomed to acting. The clinical, professional way she described it sounded scripted. Why does he call somebody in Chelsea to describe what's happening in Manhattan?
Only by understanding Jewish ethnic cohesiveness and also it's covert nature does it become easy to comprehend what was done on 9-11. Things like a number of amateur video" providers all providing the same doctored material only become comprehensible when you understand the reality of Jewish ethnic/religious cohesion.
A Sayyanim is simply a Jew loyal to Israel and willing to do things for Israel and the Jews. If you think they don't exist -- in plentiful numbers -- you are the stupidest person I have ever encountered. (It would be very instructive to find out more about the providers of "amateur" video. Have they ever been to Israel? Etc. But I hear they don't answer any questions about their videos.)
Mr. Shack: The evidence of video fakery is impressive. I can see it. One question: Why does the theory require on a fake video demolition laid over the real one (faked on TV)? Why couldn't they show us the real demolitions? (As is obvious with WT7). If the demolitions we see are faked, it seems they messed up by making them look too explosive and too much like controlled demos rather than "pancake" collapses. To make them more dramatic? The "Hollywood blockbuster" mentality? Please comment.
To the author -- The evidence of video fakery is compelling. I can entertain the prospects of this. If true, it shows that Jews do have quite a collective and ethnic loyalty. Two 2 questions: 1) Have there been accounts of people who's digital cameras unaccountably stopped working? There should be stories like that. 2nd question: There is video of people stranded at the top. It's rather long and there are many figures. Plus the falling people. This video seems real on first look. Please comment.
@Arsehel I also know someone who had a parent that was scheduled for the exact flight that flew into the twin towers (schedule was changed). Ya, but they obviously are lying because those planes never existed. Dude, I'm sorry, but what your suggesting is complete BS. We don't even have that type of technology.
@TheSpartanondrugs If you watched the whole series of September Clues, you will see that there is the technology. I see you stucked at A so not my fault. YOu talk the bs
it's way too complicated to do these thricks real time and try to influence all broadcasting camera's and at the same time coordinate real explosions at real time . it doesn't makes sense people! THEN IT WOULD BE EASIER to crash real airplanes!!!! Use your common sense in stead of looking at videos. what method would you prefer if you were corrupt: the easiest way, not a highly complicated set up with holograms or trying to alter video....
Nothing was done in real time. 9/11 was planned many years before 2001. They aired on TV a prefabricated visual scenario. To crash real airplanes would have been quite foolish.
@simonshack Hey Simon. Congratulations on figuring out this whole scam as fast as you did, I highly doubt the creators thought it would be done in under 10 years. I was curious, have you looked at the airport footage with the hijackers boarding? Perhaps a possible video for you to upload.
@simonshack simon, what in your opinion hit the first building? did people realy jump from those towers? did anyone realy die that die? what about the body parts found in the rubble?
Nothing difficult about exploding a building at the same time that your media broadcasts whatever you want them to broadcast. Especially if the same power controls all networks. Even so, one network broadcast footage showing the "ball" approaching the towers, uncovered by a fake plane. But nothing difficult about photoshopping in a plane and running it right after the "live" coverage and repeating it over and over. Also easy if most of the doctored footage was prepared well in advance.
Common sense? 2 of the 4 supposed planes are OBVIOUSLY non-existent. The other two were not holograms but edited composite. The complicated part is fabricating what a REAL aluminum plane would do when colliding with STEEL columns, ie: they don't penetrate STEEL unscathed with whole parts (turbine engine) escaping the opposite side landing on the street below. Utter nonsense.
Stop your idiocy, fool. This thing was planned far in advance. Just ask the 5 who were sent to film it.
At 2:52 the plane enters the frame from the right/west, at almost a right angle of the camera directly facing the towers, the main video. In the inserted video, syncd with the shot, we are viewing the towers from the northeast, so we see 2 sides of both towers. There is no way the plane could be completely visible in the straight on shot, and be entirely lined up with AND BEHIND the south tower in the inserted shot from the northeast at the same time. Something isn't right!
@2220Blues Fake smoke from the towers, media studio hosts, media control room, media tv producers a long with military personel, American and Unites airlines people, new york port authority, fireman, police, f.e.m.a. Where now talking thousands of people involved decreasing the possibility for complete secrecy. There's been a intentional attempt to discredit true movement for truth by people theorizing things more elaborate than they have to be.
The only weakness in the theory is the hiding of the actual 1st two demolitions and substituting different looking ones in video. (I don't even think this is necessary to the theory. We may be seeing the real demolitions, plus some mass-murder.) The actual demolition of the towers happened fast. Most would not have seen it. The instinct is to turn and run. Then, you show on TV what you want people to believe, psychology does the rest. Even show-biz magicians can pull off mass deceptions.
@2220Blues I am aware of drones. The technology exists to do these acts. I know but what you don't understand is when you make the conspiracy more elaborate then it has to be it helps discredit any true truth movement. We went from regular media cover up to direct media involvement. Every video and pic from that day was taken by planted media? Digitally created planes, holes in the buildings? The more conspirators you have the lest credible the conspiracy is...
this is ridiculous. people cant even believe there own damn eyes anymore. fucking sad. yeah we attack on our own countries for profit.. fucking stupid. dumb ass idiots
What about the vid of the ground shot where the plane flies over the head of a man standing on the street? What kind if missle can create plane shaped damage to buildings? Stop drawing preconcieved notions from a few vids and check out the dozens of other angles of the second impact.
what about a usual ''black box''' inside a airplane?? was there found a black box? cause i'm still convinced that there were airplanes flying inside the building..
Knowledge is Power, Most of these Victims are not on the SSDI please everybody do your research its easy and free, they are called the \Vicsims hehehehe, whatta big Hoax, The WTC was evacuated the occupancy that day was probably 10%.
The images does not match that day, I remember it was nice and sunny a clear day with almost no clouds, and that image from CBS<ABC and all those networks are bullcrap, people wake up 911 was a big psyop, planes don`t go into steal like butter melts on bread its clearly a fake cgi plane specially in 2001 that technology was good why these crappy images of Manhattan CGI my friends wake up sheeple|! 19 arabs with boxcutters,uhummm whatta fairy tale, |Thanks SImon Shack we New YOrkers thank you!
People need to wake the Fuck up, excuse my language, I am from NYC I remember this day like if it was now, no phones were working internet was down for a couple of hours, the only witness we had was the TV we don`t know for sure what happened that day, this documentary is the bomb the public took account on what they saw on the media, is extremely fake all of this plane crap you can hear the journalist they have zero emotions, you can tell its all scripted they knew everything on time
I'm sorry, but there are AT LEAST 5000 witnesses who saw the second plane, TONS of footage, all the passengers on board the planes disappearing that day (died?), the phone calls in the plane, and the support and scientifical evidence and even the rebunk of The Gardian to these conspiracy theories CLEARLY convince me. While the "Truthers" group are merely just a few people on the Internet who think they know too much about physics (planes are a digital effect? lol)
@HBulbrook -- The "hijacking of a plane" was a psy-op presented to Air Traffic Control that day, with all the right junk on the radar screen, etc. by planted operatives. It was all simulated for air traffic control by the techno moles including Rabbi Dov Zakheim and his bunch, the guy who runs the company that provides remote control technology to airport. There were no hijacking of planes in real life.
@HBulbrook -- The media told you there were planes filled with "victims." But it's like Mr. Shack has been pointing out, and discussed more at SeptemberClues-dot-info, the "victims" on the "victim lists" are turning up untraceable and apparently fictional. The "grieving parents" are actors use faked "photos of their lost children" (same face shot but with different clothes, etc.). They go around the country repeating the same "grief" act to keep Americans jacked up for Ziowars.
simon good work, my brother. People wouldn't know the truth even if it got up and slap them in the face, No disrespect to no one, but people got to wake up.GOD bless
@simonshack No, not necessarily stupid... it's easier to live the lie to get by and hope you don't get killed for outing the comedy of it all!!!! It's hilarious to think 10 years later, with a little investigation that anyone would think it was 19 Arabs - LOL!!!! 19 is just the number of something that goes with other numbers.... it happened at 8:46.. hhmm.. 911 846.... looks like a birthdate in there eh FUCKERS!!!! Continue on in the TRUMAN SHOW! The numbers all have relevance
The video fakery is incontrovertible. Did you see the one where the artist copied a piece of "smoke" billowing out of the WTC, enlarged it a little, then pasted it to the left to extend the smoke? With an exact duplicate -- all the same shapes, shades, and curves -- next to the first one? Or the "bridge" behind the WTC that was way too close, and moving relative to other things while nothing else was? Tons of video fakery here.
The blackout thing does not appear on a video about it in Israeli news site.. The video is available on my channel, I can't remember when this scene appears at but it's there. Simon, please explain?
What amazes me is the T.V. shot CNN and FOX News showed to America at 11am our time, showing Palestinians celebrating in the streets in broad daylight passing out desserts dancing. Gee CNN and Fox, how could that be possible when they are 10hrs ahead out time and it was 9pm in Palestine!!! OLD FOOTAGE!!!
@shweamel Yes, it is all quite comical - eh!!!! Of course I'm watching a documetary here on 9/11 with 2 guys who were film-making over a few months the NYFD (new york fire department) -- how convenient... just in time for 9/11... and of course in the lead-up they're doing there hidden messages... of course Robert Deniro starts the documentary off... what better way to SYMBOLIZE FAKERY than an ACTOR (who fakes reality for a living).
This doesn't prove shit to me. I need to hear every witness in New York City say that it was fake and they didn't see any thing hit the towers and they were all acting horrified.
a jassm missile also looks like a plane - but it can enter steel buildings at high speed + explodes inside. A boeing must have crashed and exploded on the outside like a flying beer can filled with explosives... and not melt into a steel building with a little smoke + exploding inside..
and the CNN LIVE is cutted - watch: CNN Second Plane Collides
I agree 100%, Simon. 9/11 was a media hoax, all fake from A - Z. Every idiot knows that the WTC's never existed (it would simply have been impossible to construct such skyscrapaers in the 1970's), they were invented by Hollywood in order to produce family-friendly comedy movies such as Ghostbusters, Home Alone 2: lost in New York, and Tootsie. It's amazing how people swallow everything that the government wants them to believe.
Anybody who has a big mouth, should prove each point made in September Clues wrong! Post also some fkking amateur records of that event dammit! If not have a nice cup of shut the fkk up!
@simonshack How does a digital composite do damage to matter? And how do people in real time see live digital composites in the sky? Oh, I guess the government has secret technology that is hidden from us.
@Danespina -- There are only 35 pieces of footage. Then millions of Zionists, thousands of Sayyanim, and hundreds of hard-core Zionists who are video professionals. And even then, the video doctoring is easy to see.
@Danespina -- There are only 35 pieces of footage. Then millions of Zionists, thousands of Sayyanim, and hundreds of hard-core Zi-nists who are video professionals. And even then, the video doctoring is easy to see.
If this stuff was all true there would have to be a massive amount of people who knew about it and I dont remember anybody coming out and admitting it which somebody would have by now
@dave19031981 -- All who were recruited to be involved would have been sayyanim -- hard core pro-Israel Jews probably from youth. You don't understand the tribal loyalty of the Jews and the way they feel different than the rest of us. ("Chosen," "better," justified by a "holocaust" etc. etc.)
Please spread far and wide. The 10th anniversary is upon us - and this 9/11 sham must become common knowledge. Our future - and that of our children - is at stake. Diffuse with grace, humor and self-assuredness - and wihout fear of being called a 'nutcase'. The warmongering folks behind this farce are the fools - not us normal, peaceful citizens.
@simonshack National Geographic will broadcast some 911 propaganda the upcoming week =.= btw simon how did you discover all of this? what made you think to analyze the video images, and how long did it take to make these series, I m really wondering :P
remeber the concrete supporting column was in the center and concrete slabs were the floors, so the nose makes impact, then the fuelsolodge behind the cockpit, then the fuelsolodge and the wings, then the tale. The floors above and below absorb the impact of every thing behind the cockpit, the only thing in the way of the nose was the outer steel on impact and the outer steel on exit, there is a term for that its called a through and through but is usually used to describe a bullet not a plane
we must not forget the design of these buildings, there was a light weight exterior steel skeletion, built around an internal concrete rectangle that house stair wells elevators, each floor was a concrete slab, 95% of the space in each tower was air. When the 2nd plane hits, it does not hit dead center, it hits off of center and the wings are tilted with the left wing impacting floors lower than the fuelslodge and the right wing impacting above it
What purpose do these words hold, if their existence is reactionary? Who shall use such knowledge, who shall understand objective life using such subjective and individually unproven conversations?
They continue to hold us down, and we slowly die...never hoping to improve the state of our fearful, corrupt world. The human machine repeats its dramas, while others control us from within...using what comes from without.
This is disrespectful. My goldfish, aunt, third cousin, and television set all died in those towers.
On a serious note..
Simon: I've got a question. Do you personally believe there was simply a demolitions explosion in the 2nd tower or a missile? I'm curious.. i've pondered myself and it would seem more likely as to have been simply a controlled explosion.
yes - you have pondered well...this has been debated at length on my forum (cluesforum.info) and we are reaching the conclusion that nothing was really needed to impact the towers. Please join the forum if you wish.
Why would you use a missile, when there is the potential that people would film it, with the screaching missile sound, or take a picture? Way too risky.
Lowest risk - Just plant explosives for the appearance of two "plane strikes", fake the grainy video of a charcoal plane hit the towers, and use your control of media to make sure nobody says anything about not seeing a plane.
Don't forget to create the vicsims before you do this.
Every time I watch 9/11 videos I feel sick but when I watched this I actually started to laugh and couldn't stop! It's just so stupid the creepy TV at the begging the sound effects it's like a bad joke to me. How bad do Americans think their government is?
@YouGotWoodRolled
Thats just crazy...
jjmstick 4 days ago
@YouGotWoodRolled thats funny dude so then there are alot of crazies out there unaware they are crazy.I must be crazy but it takes more then one person to determine if i am it only takes me to know if i have a disease.So anyone can diagnose disease but a doctor has to diagnose you mentally unstable.CONTROL is what that is a way to discredit and imprison someone.What is CRAZY im going crazy right now i think oh well 9 eleven was a satanic ritual false flag operation INSIDE JOB cheers buddy
777thefreedomfighter 2 weeks ago
@YouGotWoodRolled It just sounds crazy the people who think this is true are not crazy.The media are involved in the deception of 9 eleven they are actors.The military are 25 - 50 years ahead of what we know and buddy call me crazy because i have personally seen a plane vanish when i was observing chemtrails Nov.2.2011 Tor, Canada.To all the victims of the 9 eleven mega satanic ritual and sacrifice, all the millions who died in wars since Bush conquered Iraq and Afghanistan.RIP be with God
777thefreedomfighter 2 weeks ago
maybe Theresa watched plane crash on television?
jologo200 2 weeks ago
Here is what I heard that the plane that hit the second tower also hit the first tower but that WHAT I HEARD
WizKhalifa340 3 weeks ago
September Clues does not prove that there were no planes in New York, but there will always be those who believe what they are told, because it means that they don’t have to think for themselves.
Simon Shack's videos are full of innuendo, with nothing to back up the conclusions he reaches. The so called Nose-in, Nose-out sequence is a shining example. He looks at one shot only, the Fox 5 helicopter shot and totally ignores the videos taken from the opposite side of the South Tower.
alawson911 3 weeks ago
@alawson911 Anthony darling! Good to see you over here! So have you done some 9/11 research lately? What is it, now again, that "I totally ignore"? It seems to me that, in the course of the last 4 years, I (and my fellow researchers at cluesforum.info) have covered just about every possible aspect of 9/11. Could you kindly provide a link to your own body of research and evidence, so that we can confront our findings? Thanks very muchly, sweet Anthony!
simonshack 3 weeks ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
@simonshack
Your "endearments" are neither witty nor distracting, but it seems that you have lost your ability to read.
"What is it, now again, that "I totally ignore"?"
Here it is, again, as stated in the comment you are responding to:
"He [Simon Shack] looks at one shot only, the Fox 5 helicopter shot and totally ignores the videos taken from the opposite side of the South Tower."
If you couldn't work that out, it is not difficult to see why your research appears to be faulty.
alawson911 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
alawson911 3 weeks ago
The nose in nose out also is the same with this video close up.
/watch?v=KpEct4q4z9o
slendy20dollars 4 weeks ago
The funny thing is you can prove this is a conspiracy like this video has and you will get a patriotic American that will say its bullshit and they will ridicule to the best of their ability.The evidence speaks for itself no more debates with blithering idiots they are the sheep cattle the elite believe they are and will never change until they are facing execution.
777thefreedomfighter 1 month ago
For ALL these people to be involved in covering this up, wouldnt SOMEBODY have come forward?
cyberboy855 1 month ago
@cyberboy855
Dimitri Khalezov has come forward.... And he explains in detail what took place on that FUCKING jewish holiday.... Besides there were inside trades that lead up to the culprits.... And none of them lived in a cave in Afghanistan...
Massaricossudo 1 month ago
@cyberboy855 Some would argue that they have been killed off or payed a very generous amount.
jazon345 3 weeks ago
@cyberboy855 Come forward to who? And I doubt there are many people who actually understand what they were involved in. Compartmentalization.
LifePsyop 2 weeks ago
Wouldn't there be hundreds of videos of a missile hitting the second tower? I believe a lot of civilians would be filming the first tower that was just hit by a missile of its own. I should have seen some of those videos on youtube, right? I've never heard of conspiracy videos dissapearing from youtube. Sure, the towers were demolished, but missiles? Hmm...
yrrahyrrah 1 month ago
Most of you don't know what they're talking about, the fire and the heat caused the collapse of the towers.
Forkanyen 1 month ago
You probably thought this terrorist attack was real,
nope, Chuck Testa
slendy20dollars 1 month ago
While this is interesting, I am not convinced. A question to the people who believe the No-Planes theory: If you met someone on the street who says that they 100% certainly saw a plane(s) fly in the tower, would you be 100% convinced that he/she is lying? Same question goes for if the person said they knew someone who died in a plane/building.
nlo13 1 month ago
@nlo13 Please google "letter from Torbjon cluesforum". You will find a page of my forum, scroll down to the 7th post and read the "Letter from Torbjon". After you have read it, ask yourself why Torbjon would possibly lie about his personal experience in Manhattan that morning. He heard or saw no airliner although he most certainly should have. You may also wish to enter my website "septemberclues.info) and read the page called "Visual control of 9/11"(and other interesting testimonies).
simonshack 1 month ago
@nlo13
Yes, because there were no planes... it has been proven.... Arrest the liar... he/she deserves to be in the front line in Iraq...
Massaricossudo 1 month ago
@nlo13 The problem with your theory is that no one has come forward to say they saw a plane. FOX Reporter Dick Oliver who was interviewing people on the streets that day reported this: "I don't know whether we have confirmed this to be an aircraft or to be more specific, some people said they thought they saw a missile...we might be open to the possibility that this was a missile attack on these buildings."
stjohnc 3 weeks ago
Did no one notice at 1:01 he almost says missle instead of plane?
rpnsp 1 month ago 7
@rpnsp
I have indeed pointed out this apparent "slip-of-tongue" in "SEPTEMBER CLUES part D" :
watch?v=HuB4jLAuVLk (at 6min25sec)
Please, everyone: do take the time to watch ALL 9 parts of September Clues ! :O)
Then, if you wish, go to my septemberclues.info website and read its contents.
simonshack 1 month ago 4
Comment removed
rpnsp 1 month ago
The best insight of all time ... the only 'CluesForum' that matters !
JoePub100 2 months ago 2
Comment removed
VanDammeLibrary 2 months ago
compare 1:53 in the video " The "Jumpers" of 9/11 are all FAKES?" with 7:30 in the video " 9-11 Photos The Networks Will NOT Show You!!! - Remembering The Jumpers"
microsoftDONTwork 2 months ago
@microsoftDONTwork
Indeed! And there are countless such blatant forgeries to be found in the available 9/11 "jumper" imagery. On our discussion forum ( cluesforum.info ) we have analyzed and dissected virtually ALL the "jumper" imagery in every imaginable way:
tinyurl . com /FALLINGMANcf (remove all spaces)
The notion that "200 people jumped to their death" was scripted for shock-and-awe effect - and to convince the public that there were actually people inside the towers that morning.
simonshack 2 months ago 3
@simonshack wait a minute are you saying there were no people in the towers that morning. what about all the relatives, who have been interviewed and they no people who died in the towers
individuality1988 1 month ago
@individuality1988 The people you've seen impersonating family members are all actors. Please watch "911 ACTORS" and meet a few of them:
watch?v=6aPvJSQtmoE
If you wish, we have tons of information at cluesforum.info gathered in the last few years which supports the working hypothesis that no one died on 9/11. The vast majority isn't even listed in the various official US/or New York death records. The 9/11 victims were, by and large, virtual identities.
simonshack 1 month ago
Nothing a little video editing cant fix. It wasn't faked OK? now lets see how many of you believe the moon landing was faked?
SuperAlexdunn 2 months ago
@SuperAlexdunn
Are we to take this question of yours as implying that you actually believe in the moon landings?
Are we also supposed to be lectured by you on the subject ? Lastly, are you by any chance one of those folks who go around telling people that "If you don't believe we actually went back and forth to the moon flawlessly six times between 1969 and 1972 - you are seriously retarded?"
I do hope all my questions adequately answered yours ;-)
simonshack 2 months ago 6
@simonshack my iq is kind of low :(
SuperAlexdunn 2 months ago
@SuperAlexdunn You don't have to apologize for anything. The fact that you admitted you were wrong and accepted what SimonShack said shows that your intelligence is actually above the average individual.
jazon345 3 weeks ago
@simonshack It was wrong of me to put that comment up, I don't know why I did it. So sorry :(
SuperAlexdunn 1 month ago
The "2nd plane" was actually explosion from the inside. When I was actually watching live broadcast about the even on the CNN, after the building 7 collapsed. I realized immediately, that building 7 was clearly a demolition of the building. When G.Bush announced, that Al-Qaeda was responsible and exactly year after 9-11 announced, that US is going to invade Iraq, it was clear for me, that 9-11 was a false flag operation.
rpdigital17 2 months ago
Are you guys all missing the point of this video. It is questioning what exactly hit the buildings. It is suggesting that it could have been a missile not a plane. It doesn't make any claims of the collapse, rather it shows the rapid pace at which the media try to confuse and convince you of the story "they want you to believe". A lot of you are questioning things that have no relevance to this film.
Jamato4891 2 months ago in playlist SEPTEMBER CLUES new
simonshacke,you are FREAKING AWESOME
jennyqueen127 3 months ago 2
I absolutely agree what we saw on TV was faked. These planes supposedly flew, intact without breaking apart or crashing into, THROUGH and INTO the buildings before exploding! Yeah okay! Even when a plane crashes into a body of WATER it crashes, explodes and breaks apart on the surface! I guess I could throw a soda can through my front door if I throw it hard enough? lmao
sunberst1 3 months ago
are you saying that noone saw a plane that day approaching, flying low and making a loud noise. Surely people were watching the whole thing. I wanna believe it coz everything else you did seemed plausible. so nobody saw a plane from the streets or buildings?
burtcane 3 months ago
@loosechangeexposed
I'll ask again a FOURTH TIME: which amateur video, showing planes hitting WTC, do you believe is not doctored, fabricated or composite? You have seen them all, no? They are part of your CONSPIRACY story, so it's YOU that needs to prove authenticity. Your EVIDENCE is now under examination, not YOUR VERSION of it. Pick one, numnuts. If your evidence is fraud, so is your whole fucking story. Or didn't they teach you that in public school? You gov't shills are not that bright.
stonecutter 3 months ago
@loosechangeexposed
"the burdon of proof is in the hands of anyone who thinks it was a conspiracy"
Astounding absurdity. Numnuts like you are laughable. Your logic is that the gov't CONSPIRACY story needs no proof (except for YOUR added proof), yet people who know damn well the story is a fraud now need to prove the story itself is a CONSPIRACY?
Is that you, GWB Jr.?
"it is up to you to prove that every video that shows the plane was faked"
Um- have you actually watched Sept. Clues?
Moron.
stonecutter 3 months ago
@loosechangeexposed
Ok I'll ask a third time. Which amateur video do you claim is authentic?
stonecutter 3 months ago
@loosechangeexposed
I don't know what "truther" means, but your hypothesis of the angled entry of the pentagon plane is pure junk. No witness for this claim either. The same plane that hits the light post (with the shattered glass laying next to the pole?) flies just above the grass, then at the very last second goes into a 45 degree angle turn? How about selling me whatever it is you're on- I'd like a break from physics and reality for a bit.
Which "amateur" video do you claim is authentic?
stonecutter 3 months ago
After watch all the videos twice, it concerns me that this could affect the "controlled demolition" theory. Since there were supposedly no buildings. It's there a chance that fake footage could be mixed with some real footage that day? I mean, could be the collapses real but with fake layers and backgrouds to make it look the way they want it to? it was possible to generate a collapsing building in 2001 that looked so convincing?
DMHR100 3 months ago
@DMHR100 Nonononono, the controlled demolitions were all real, the planes however, were not.
jazon345 3 months ago
@DMHR100
All the footage of (the crucial events of) 9/11 was but a Hollywood production. What was shown on Live TV was a prefabricated movie. Think "Independence Day" (released in 1996): that movie showed all sorts of collapses, including the Empire State Building exploding - from top down (!) - just like the absurd WTC collapses seen on TV. The real collapses took place behind a smokescreen & were never captured on film. Please go to:
tinyurl . com / collapseanimations (remove all spaces)
simonshack 3 months ago
@simonshack I know wat you mean. The thing is that I had watched some "footage" of september 11 that doesn't appear in this documentary or in your page. I don't want to assume that 100% of the videos are fake yet until I can watch more analysis. Also, even if there's no real footage of the buildings, looking at groud zero still suggest that they collapsed, since the adjacent buildings didn't have too much damage. Anyway, keep the good work. I'll be looking for more videos.
DMHR100 3 months ago
@simonshack Hey Simon. Any chance you could analyze the hijackers at the airport terminals next? ^_^
V1t1at1x 3 months ago
@simonshack
Great job Simon. Your "sure man's elbow" shot cracked up my 10 year old nephew. Even he can see and recognize the absolute absurdity of the video editing.
stonecutter 3 months ago
if the government was able to somehow fake the planes at the WTC on live t.v., other people's personal videos, and infront of the 1000's who witnessed it live at the scene, then how come they didn't edit a video at the pentagon with a plane using CGI? if they planned it out they could have had a video already edited and released it to the media moments after the pentagon was hit.
loosechangeexposed 3 months ago
@loosechangeexposed
Your question and assertion reveals your lack of understanding of what the Pentagon is. Would you believe a passenger plane would pierce through that wall with no parts being obliterated and left on the exterior? Far few people would because that's just silly. Not only that, they haven't released ANY photo/video of this supposed plane. Why is that? Because there was no fucking plane. Personal videos? Which one do you think is a "personal" video? STFU with your idiocy, fool.
stonecutter 3 months ago
@loosechangeexposed
Just in case you're not crystal clear on your idiocy, you can choke on this Maxim of Law from Bouvier's 1856 Law Dictionary: Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat.
translation: The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies.
translation: You're the dipshit pimping the fascist State story (by which we've gone on invasion conquests and murdered hundreds of thousands - AGAIN), so it's YOU that has burden of PROOF, not conspiracy THEORY.
Retard.
stonecutter 3 months ago
@stonecutter just ignore him stonecutter, not one debunker including LCE has ever said anything about this video /watch?v=BKb30oSwBzc that explains how it is wrong, it is narrated by the one guy who shuts down anyone who does not have their eyes open to the truth.
keep up the fight and peace out bro.
911truthisfound 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol if you believe all of this you are an idiot
d3mon 3 months ago
do you still watch cnn?
ykorotia 3 months ago
"And I would say, you know, approximately 10 minutes ago." (2:16)
The "you know" sounds like an amateur actresses trying to sound natural. But it's a little slip that sounds UNnatural. It sounds like she' discussing something she's familiar with, rehearsed, already long gone over. It's not how you talk about something new, amazing, or alarming. This Sayyanim was very nervous in her first acting job.
She's clearly making an effort, too, to set the thing up according to a scripted timeline.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
Why did he call a woman in Chelsea to tell him what's happening in Manhattan? Because she's a Sayyanim wife of a Sayyanim producer. (Jewish "friends" of Israel) obviously. I looked up this woman, Theresa Renaud, on Google. Her face looks half Ashkenazi if not full Ashkenazi.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
So the Sayyanim wife of the Sayyanim producer reacted to the explosion immediately "live" with B. Gumbel even though the sound would have taken 8 seconds to reach her in Chelsea? (3:00)
Smoking gun right there. Listen to her. (1:57) Notice how she adds "yes" after the line "east side of the building." Sounds like a woman unaccustomed to acting. The clinical, professional way she described it sounded scripted. Why does he call somebody in Chelsea to describe what's happening in Manhattan?
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
@DivineFellowship
"Why does he call somebody in Chelsea to describe what's happening in Manhattan?"
Amen to that, brother! The whole thing is pure nonsense.
stonecutter 3 months ago
Comment removed
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
Only by understanding Jewish ethnic cohesiveness and also it's covert nature does it become easy to comprehend what was done on 9-11. Things like a number of amateur video" providers all providing the same doctored material only become comprehensible when you understand the reality of Jewish ethnic/religious cohesion.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
A Sayyanim is simply a Jew loyal to Israel and willing to do things for Israel and the Jews. If you think they don't exist -- in plentiful numbers -- you are the stupidest person I have ever encountered. (It would be very instructive to find out more about the providers of "amateur" video. Have they ever been to Israel? Etc. But I hear they don't answer any questions about their videos.)
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
Mr. Shack: The evidence of video fakery is impressive. I can see it. One question: Why does the theory require on a fake video demolition laid over the real one (faked on TV)? Why couldn't they show us the real demolitions? (As is obvious with WT7). If the demolitions we see are faked, it seems they messed up by making them look too explosive and too much like controlled demos rather than "pancake" collapses. To make them more dramatic? The "Hollywood blockbuster" mentality? Please comment.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
Comment removed
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
@simonshack -- Yes. There actually would have been real plane wreckage, for one thing.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
Comment removed
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
To the author -- The evidence of video fakery is compelling. I can entertain the prospects of this. If true, it shows that Jews do have quite a collective and ethnic loyalty. Two 2 questions: 1) Have there been accounts of people who's digital cameras unaccountably stopped working? There should be stories like that. 2nd question: There is video of people stranded at the top. It's rather long and there are many figures. Plus the falling people. This video seems real on first look. Please comment.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
Go see on Youtube «September 11 The Greatest Make Believe in history»
By the way, Thumbs Up for "September Clues" series.
VanDammeLibrary 4 months ago
you no-planers sure provide a good giggle...
JimmyCooperAustralia 4 months ago
5:48 yet there are tens of many films out there showing planes from the news and the civilians
thevidmaster101266 4 months ago
Dude, your an idiot. I'm sorry but I know people who saw the planes hit the towers. Guessing there getting payed to, right?
TheSpartanondrugs 4 months ago
@TheSpartanondrugs I believe there was a missile that looked like a plane. Your friends were blind.
Arsehel 4 months ago
@Arsehel I also know someone who had a parent that was scheduled for the exact flight that flew into the twin towers (schedule was changed). Ya, but they obviously are lying because those planes never existed. Dude, I'm sorry, but what your suggesting is complete BS. We don't even have that type of technology.
TheSpartanondrugs 4 months ago
@TheSpartanondrugs If you watched the whole series of September Clues, you will see that there is the technology. I see you stucked at A so not my fault. YOu talk the bs
Arsehel 4 months ago
it's way too complicated to do these thricks real time and try to influence all broadcasting camera's and at the same time coordinate real explosions at real time . it doesn't makes sense people! THEN IT WOULD BE EASIER to crash real airplanes!!!! Use your common sense in stead of looking at videos. what method would you prefer if you were corrupt: the easiest way, not a highly complicated set up with holograms or trying to alter video....
fredjebelgium 4 months ago 3
@fredjebelgium
Please go to
septemberclues.info
Nothing was done in real time. 9/11 was planned many years before 2001. They aired on TV a prefabricated visual scenario. To crash real airplanes would have been quite foolish.
simonshack 4 months ago 7
@simonshack why would it be foulish? just qurious?
Arsehel 4 months ago
@simonshack Hey Simon. Congratulations on figuring out this whole scam as fast as you did, I highly doubt the creators thought it would be done in under 10 years. I was curious, have you looked at the airport footage with the hijackers boarding? Perhaps a possible video for you to upload.
V1t1at1x 3 months ago
@simonshack simon, what in your opinion hit the first building? did people realy jump from those towers? did anyone realy die that die? what about the body parts found in the rubble?
DrN0s 2 months ago
@simonshack why did they have to do this bad video in a hurry and botch it if they had years to plan this attack?
SubwayRatt 2 months ago
@SubwayRatt
"The best laid schemes of mice and men go oft awry"
John Steinbeck ("Of Mice and men" - 1937)
simonshack 2 months ago
@simonshack Do you believe that Flight 93 was also a lie? I'm not doubting you, I highly enjoyed these videos, I'm just wondering.
noog0909 2 months ago
Nothing difficult about exploding a building at the same time that your media broadcasts whatever you want them to broadcast. Especially if the same power controls all networks. Even so, one network broadcast footage showing the "ball" approaching the towers, uncovered by a fake plane. But nothing difficult about photoshopping in a plane and running it right after the "live" coverage and repeating it over and over. Also easy if most of the doctored footage was prepared well in advance.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
@fredjebelgium
Common sense? 2 of the 4 supposed planes are OBVIOUSLY non-existent. The other two were not holograms but edited composite. The complicated part is fabricating what a REAL aluminum plane would do when colliding with STEEL columns, ie: they don't penetrate STEEL unscathed with whole parts (turbine engine) escaping the opposite side landing on the street below. Utter nonsense.
Stop your idiocy, fool. This thing was planned far in advance. Just ask the 5 who were sent to film it.
stonecutter 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are your other videos better than this? You didn't really prove anything with this one. Why didn't you use the Today show clip? :/
Gunbladewarrior 4 months ago
At 2:52 the plane enters the frame from the right/west, at almost a right angle of the camera directly facing the towers, the main video. In the inserted video, syncd with the shot, we are viewing the towers from the northeast, so we see 2 sides of both towers. There is no way the plane could be completely visible in the straight on shot, and be entirely lined up with AND BEHIND the south tower in the inserted shot from the northeast at the same time. Something isn't right!
thcount 4 months ago
One thing to say. F U america!
fleoflux 4 months ago
@2220Blues Fake smoke from the towers, media studio hosts, media control room, media tv producers a long with military personel, American and Unites airlines people, new york port authority, fireman, police, f.e.m.a. Where now talking thousands of people involved decreasing the possibility for complete secrecy. There's been a intentional attempt to discredit true movement for truth by people theorizing things more elaborate than they have to be.
GeeCoach35 4 months ago
The only weakness in the theory is the hiding of the actual 1st two demolitions and substituting different looking ones in video. (I don't even think this is necessary to the theory. We may be seeing the real demolitions, plus some mass-murder.) The actual demolition of the towers happened fast. Most would not have seen it. The instinct is to turn and run. Then, you show on TV what you want people to believe, psychology does the rest. Even show-biz magicians can pull off mass deceptions.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
@2220Blues I am aware of drones. The technology exists to do these acts. I know but what you don't understand is when you make the conspiracy more elaborate then it has to be it helps discredit any true truth movement. We went from regular media cover up to direct media involvement. Every video and pic from that day was taken by planted media? Digitally created planes, holes in the buildings? The more conspirators you have the lest credible the conspiracy is...
GeeCoach35 4 months ago
@2220Blues im sorry but that makes absolutely no fucking sense at all.
ogjuggalo4545 4 months ago
this is ridiculous. people cant even believe there own damn eyes anymore. fucking sad. yeah we attack on our own countries for profit.. fucking stupid. dumb ass idiots
ogjuggalo4545 4 months ago
What about the vid of the ground shot where the plane flies over the head of a man standing on the street? What kind if missle can create plane shaped damage to buildings? Stop drawing preconcieved notions from a few vids and check out the dozens of other angles of the second impact.
GeeCoach35 4 months ago
Thank you, excellent analysis and video, am reuploading and sharing, peace.
badattitude77769 4 months ago
what about a usual ''black box''' inside a airplane?? was there found a black box? cause i'm still convinced that there were airplanes flying inside the building..
jeroennnnnnnnnnnnnn 4 months ago
@jeroennnnnnnnnnnnnn They never found black boxes, never ever, because there were no planes hehehe! period most of the evidence were planted.
felineluv712 4 months ago
Knowledge is Power, Most of these Victims are not on the SSDI please everybody do your research its easy and free, they are called the \Vicsims hehehehe, whatta big Hoax, The WTC was evacuated the occupancy that day was probably 10%.
felineluv712 4 months ago
The images does not match that day, I remember it was nice and sunny a clear day with almost no clouds, and that image from CBS<ABC and all those networks are bullcrap, people wake up 911 was a big psyop, planes don`t go into steal like butter melts on bread its clearly a fake cgi plane specially in 2001 that technology was good why these crappy images of Manhattan CGI my friends wake up sheeple|! 19 arabs with boxcutters,uhummm whatta fairy tale, |Thanks SImon Shack we New YOrkers thank you!
felineluv712 4 months ago
People need to wake the Fuck up, excuse my language, I am from NYC I remember this day like if it was now, no phones were working internet was down for a couple of hours, the only witness we had was the TV we don`t know for sure what happened that day, this documentary is the bomb the public took account on what they saw on the media, is extremely fake all of this plane crap you can hear the journalist they have zero emotions, you can tell its all scripted they knew everything on time
felineluv712 4 months ago
America sucks....-_-
ninetaledj 4 months ago
*cough* BULL FUCKING SHIT GET A FUCKING LIFE AND MAN THE FUCK UP *cough*
InbunnyHD 4 months ago
What about the dead? I've heard a lot about someone who knows someone that died there.
freitasnetuno 4 months ago
I'm sorry, but there are AT LEAST 5000 witnesses who saw the second plane, TONS of footage, all the passengers on board the planes disappearing that day (died?), the phone calls in the plane, and the support and scientifical evidence and even the rebunk of The Gardian to these conspiracy theories CLEARLY convince me. While the "Truthers" group are merely just a few people on the Internet who think they know too much about physics (planes are a digital effect? lol)
JEIF11 4 months ago
Fuck Bush
TheAppleShampoo182 4 months ago
@TheAppleShampoo182 you spelt clinton wrong.
loosechangeexposed 3 months ago
@loosechangeexposed
You got pwned. Your whole story is complete fraud, just like the Naudet (FAKE) brothers cartoon.
Lamepensetoujours 3 months ago
So if there was no plane that crashed then what happened to the hijacked one?
HBulbrook 4 months ago
@HBulbrook -- The "hijacking of a plane" was a psy-op presented to Air Traffic Control that day, with all the right junk on the radar screen, etc. by planted operatives. It was all simulated for air traffic control by the techno moles including Rabbi Dov Zakheim and his bunch, the guy who runs the company that provides remote control technology to airport. There were no hijacking of planes in real life.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
@DivineFellowship so what about the victims who died on the planes on the other two planes at the pentagon and the field in Pennsylvania
HBulbrook 4 months ago
@HBulbrook -- The media told you there were planes filled with "victims." But it's like Mr. Shack has been pointing out, and discussed more at SeptemberClues-dot-info, the "victims" on the "victim lists" are turning up untraceable and apparently fictional. The "grieving parents" are actors use faked "photos of their lost children" (same face shot but with different clothes, etc.). They go around the country repeating the same "grief" act to keep Americans jacked up for Ziowars.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
@DivineFellowship I'm not even american so I dont really care, but thats probably the stupidest thing i've ever heard.
HBulbrook 4 months ago
simon good work, my brother. People wouldn't know the truth even if it got up and slap them in the face, No disrespect to no one, but people got to wake up.GOD bless
BornAgain771 4 months ago
Comment removed
mrpunchy222 4 months ago
@simonshack No, not necessarily stupid... it's easier to live the lie to get by and hope you don't get killed for outing the comedy of it all!!!! It's hilarious to think 10 years later, with a little investigation that anyone would think it was 19 Arabs - LOL!!!! 19 is just the number of something that goes with other numbers.... it happened at 8:46.. hhmm.. 911 846.... looks like a birthdate in there eh FUCKERS!!!! Continue on in the TRUMAN SHOW! The numbers all have relevance
greg12145 4 months ago
THIS SEEMS TO BE ON PURPOSE.
I know its sad, but i laughed.
GenTortosine 4 months ago
so how were people filming this when it was happening? like they knew this was about to happen?
yennu03 4 months ago
Happy 9/11...
freitasnetuno 4 months ago
Simon Shack is clearly trying to discredit the truth movement with bullshit like this
SpasticatedCunt 4 months ago
The video fakery is incontrovertible. Did you see the one where the artist copied a piece of "smoke" billowing out of the WTC, enlarged it a little, then pasted it to the left to extend the smoke? With an exact duplicate -- all the same shapes, shades, and curves -- next to the first one? Or the "bridge" behind the WTC that was way too close, and moving relative to other things while nothing else was? Tons of video fakery here.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
The blackout thing does not appear on a video about it in Israeli news site.. The video is available on my channel, I can't remember when this scene appears at but it's there. Simon, please explain?
Stralinism 4 months ago
@Stralinism 0:40, no blackout.
Stralinism 4 months ago
@Stralinism I think this is the same scene just in different angel and in both you see the nose-out
Stralinism 4 months ago
So you're denying that it was a plane that hit the second tower? What about all the countless home videos that show it?
BunMyster 4 months ago
What amazes me is the T.V. shot CNN and FOX News showed to America at 11am our time, showing Palestinians celebrating in the streets in broad daylight passing out desserts dancing. Gee CNN and Fox, how could that be possible when they are 10hrs ahead out time and it was 9pm in Palestine!!! OLD FOOTAGE!!!
shweamel 4 months ago
@shweamel Yes, it is all quite comical - eh!!!! Of course I'm watching a documetary here on 9/11 with 2 guys who were film-making over a few months the NYFD (new york fire department) -- how convenient... just in time for 9/11... and of course in the lead-up they're doing there hidden messages... of course Robert Deniro starts the documentary off... what better way to SYMBOLIZE FAKERY than an ACTOR (who fakes reality for a living).
greg12145 4 months ago
lol your way of measuring things are really convincing
elitotaku 4 months ago
7:39 to 8:05 gets me everytime. Where is the plane? I hope for all men's sake that Ron Paul wins!
stpapel 4 months ago
@stpapel the plane might have flown at the same speed as i ride my bikecyckle and was a bit late.
elitotaku 4 months ago
@elitotaku ??? is that good or bad?!
stpapel 4 months ago
@stpapel it just means that his way of measureing things isnt really convincing.
elitotaku 4 months ago
If they were supposed to cover it with the banner on one channel why would they show it clearly on another.
RamTerritory 4 months ago
This doesn't prove shit to me. I need to hear every witness in New York City say that it was fake and they didn't see any thing hit the towers and they were all acting horrified.
RamTerritory 4 months ago
Comment removed
SuperYesyesyo 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
a jassm missile also looks like a plane - but it can enter steel buildings at high speed + explodes inside. A boeing must have crashed and exploded on the outside like a flying beer can filled with explosives... and not melt into a steel building with a little smoke + exploding inside..
and the CNN LIVE is cutted - watch: CNN Second Plane Collides
0:53 + 2:18
ohter Amateur Video: watch?v=nJ0D9PUpDOg&feature=related
the filmer says - It was a military plane! (at 2:15)
SuperYesyesyo 4 months ago
it fuckin pancaked coz of the jetfuel!!
sorry, wrong video.
shill.
xNAJAFx 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I agree 100%, Simon. 9/11 was a media hoax, all fake from A - Z. Every idiot knows that the WTC's never existed (it would simply have been impossible to construct such skyscrapaers in the 1970's), they were invented by Hollywood in order to produce family-friendly comedy movies such as Ghostbusters, Home Alone 2: lost in New York, and Tootsie. It's amazing how people swallow everything that the government wants them to believe.
NotableJInx2 4 months ago 11
Anybody who has a big mouth, should prove each point made in September Clues wrong! Post also some fkking amateur records of that event dammit! If not have a nice cup of shut the fkk up!
MrMakaveli58 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch all to this if you want the truth on the pentagon or to attempt to debunk!
/watch?v=hVaGht6eHoQ
megamogx 4 months ago in playlist 9/11
There are countless pieces of footage showing the plane hitting the towers, not just the footage from the news reports.
Danespina 4 months ago 2
@Danespina
Indeed - there are plenty of them. They have all been thoroughly analyzed - one by one - and turn out to be digital composites. All of them.
septemberclues.info
simonshack 4 months ago
@simonshack How does a digital composite do damage to matter? And how do people in real time see live digital composites in the sky? Oh, I guess the government has secret technology that is hidden from us.
RamTerritory 4 months ago
@simonshack I actually know someone who saw the plane hit the towers... guess the government payed them to, right?
TheSpartanondrugs 4 months ago
@Danespina
No they don't.
You really ARE a window licking mong aren't you.
GARGLER42 4 months ago
@Danespina -- Countless? No, they have are a limited number, and it looks like they were all provided by sayyanim.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
@Danespina -- There are only 35 pieces of footage. Then millions of Zionists, thousands of Sayyanim, and hundreds of hard-core Zionists who are video professionals. And even then, the video doctoring is easy to see.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Danespina -- There are only 35 pieces of footage. Then millions of Zionists, thousands of Sayyanim, and hundreds of hard-core Zi-nists who are video professionals. And even then, the video doctoring is easy to see.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
That doesnt really answer the question though
dave19031981 4 months ago
If this stuff was all true there would have to be a massive amount of people who knew about it and I dont remember anybody coming out and admitting it which somebody would have by now
dave19031981 4 months ago
@dave19031981 -- All who were recruited to be involved would have been sayyanim -- hard core pro-Israel Jews probably from youth. You don't understand the tribal loyalty of the Jews and the way they feel different than the rest of us. ("Chosen," "better," justified by a "holocaust" etc. etc.)
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
Sorry. I don't buy it. There are too many eyewitnesses that saw the planes entering in the buildings.
mattcure 4 months ago
Simon, thanks so much for shedding light on the few remaining questions that I had about that day. You're a hero, brother.
AwarenessSquared 4 months ago
@AwarenessSquared
You are very welcome :O)
Please spread far and wide. The 10th anniversary is upon us - and this 9/11 sham must become common knowledge. Our future - and that of our children - is at stake. Diffuse with grace, humor and self-assuredness - and wihout fear of being called a 'nutcase'. The warmongering folks behind this farce are the fools - not us normal, peaceful citizens.
simonshack 4 months ago
@simonshack National Geographic will broadcast some 911 propaganda the upcoming week =.= btw simon how did you discover all of this? what made you think to analyze the video images, and how long did it take to make these series, I m really wondering :P
onlycooler1021 4 months ago
@simonshack Simon, is Ron Paul also a shill? Or is he legit?
V1t1at1x 4 months ago
@V1t1at1x
I'm afraid I don't know enough about Ron Paul to express my opinion about him.
simonshack 4 months ago
@simonshack Is it just me?or the msnbc shot had a building right there when it hit south tower and the live shot did not?
Xxandrew01 4 months ago
inside job
SkriLLexV1 4 months ago
remeber the concrete supporting column was in the center and concrete slabs were the floors, so the nose makes impact, then the fuelsolodge behind the cockpit, then the fuelsolodge and the wings, then the tale. The floors above and below absorb the impact of every thing behind the cockpit, the only thing in the way of the nose was the outer steel on impact and the outer steel on exit, there is a term for that its called a through and through but is usually used to describe a bullet not a plane
tsharpmac420 4 months ago
we must not forget the design of these buildings, there was a light weight exterior steel skeletion, built around an internal concrete rectangle that house stair wells elevators, each floor was a concrete slab, 95% of the space in each tower was air. When the 2nd plane hits, it does not hit dead center, it hits off of center and the wings are tilted with the left wing impacting floors lower than the fuelslodge and the right wing impacting above it
tsharpmac420 4 months ago
Within these comments, we all see conflict.
What purpose do these words hold, if their existence is reactionary? Who shall use such knowledge, who shall understand objective life using such subjective and individually unproven conversations?
They continue to hold us down, and we slowly die...never hoping to improve the state of our fearful, corrupt world. The human machine repeats its dramas, while others control us from within...using what comes from without.
Sacrifice8 4 months ago
This video is stupid.
Planes did hit the buildings, if you deny that, your blind.
SonnyREast 5 months ago
One last question simon. Around the 4:35 mark, the song playing, what is the name of it so I can find it and likely purchase it from your website?
AskQuestionFindTruth 5 months ago
Please visit - rememberingbuilding7 (dot) o r g
yootoob1958 5 months ago
This is disrespectful. My goldfish, aunt, third cousin, and television set all died in those towers.
On a serious note..
Simon: I've got a question. Do you personally believe there was simply a demolitions explosion in the 2nd tower or a missile? I'm curious.. i've pondered myself and it would seem more likely as to have been simply a controlled explosion.
AskQuestionFindTruth 6 months ago
@AskQuestionFindTruth
yes - you have pondered well...this has been debated at length on my forum (cluesforum.info) and we are reaching the conclusion that nothing was really needed to impact the towers. Please join the forum if you wish.
simonshack 6 months ago
@AskQuestionFindTruth
Why would you use a missile, when there is the potential that people would film it, with the screaching missile sound, or take a picture? Way too risky.
Lowest risk - Just plant explosives for the appearance of two "plane strikes", fake the grainy video of a charcoal plane hit the towers, and use your control of media to make sure nobody says anything about not seeing a plane.
Don't forget to create the vicsims before you do this.
Oh, and it wasn't a controlled demo.
sanluisskywatch 6 months ago
@AskQuestionFindTruth As in- Watch the video where the tower "dustifies" as old Judy Wood of (admittedly CIA Mind Control) Virginia Tech would say.
sanluisskywatch 6 months ago
Damn. I still can't believe that there are people that believe the 9/11 shit.
All of this was made to attack another countries, steal their natural resources.
StraitKillaBuzAmigo 6 months ago
Every time I watch 9/11 videos I feel sick but when I watched this I actually started to laugh and couldn't stop! It's just so stupid the creepy TV at the begging the sound effects it's like a bad joke to me. How bad do Americans think their government is?
vongranger 6 months ago
If I wasn't 100% sure already this sad, morally sick gov't had something to do with 9/11, I am 1000% sure today. Thank you for posting this video.
takeover08 6 months ago