Added: 6 years ago
From: bblcsedona
Views: 27,996
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (194)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If she knows the cure for cancer, then she should fucking post it on a damn website for all to see. Just fucking tell us. None of these long drawn out rants on conspiracies.

    NEWS FLASH: WE DONT FUCKING CARE! We just want to know a cure if you have one. Fucking shut your mouth, make a website, post what a person has to do in order to cure cancer, and be done with it. The end.

  • Doesn't surprise me that Day touts these wacko consipracy theories...her husband, (ex-CA Congressman) William Dannemeyer, was one of the key figures behind that discredited "Clinton Body Count" list that was making the rounds in the mid-90s, and maintains that murder victim Laci Peterson was killed not by her husband, but by a Satanic cult (he apparently jumped on the "Satanic Panic" bandwagon about 15 years too late, LOL).

  • Doctor Day knows her facts when it comes to the body and medicine. She is a smart and well studied person who comes across very grounded and well thought out....she is incredible :)

  • I love her. She rocks. Outspoken and spunky and tough.

  • Day is 100% correct. I knew of her case & after my dear relatives died from cancer while on chemo & radiation, when I got cancer I juiced tons of fresh veggies/fruits & ate all berries & before my eyes in just 1 to 2 weeks my squamous cell carcinomas vanished off my skin, my immune system was stronger & all pain evaporated. It's the LIVING ENZYMES in the juice that eradicates the free radicals & carcinogens that feed the cancer cells, so they are withheld their nutrition & starve to death.

  • Sometimes chemo works but in the majority of cases it does not because it supresses the immune system.

    If you were not born with cancer and are not genetically predisposed to it then it is simply common sense that your own body can cure itself if given the chance. This is not rocket science.

  • God bless Dr. Lorraine Day.

  • Brilliant doc.

  • Brilliant woman. She is telling the truth. Chemo kills.

  • how does she know there is cover up ? Maybe there is simply ignorance and disbelief.

  • @maciejwrotek Dr Day was a med dr in San Fran who has trained thousands of student dr's. she's got the cred and stacks of research to back it all up.

  • @maciejwrotek - The oncology/radiation industry is a "cash cow industry". The FDA, CDC, USDA, Big Pharma, Medical Establishment & Med Insurance Fraud Industry have created this reciprocal-mutualism financial scheme to get rich off a process that can be termed "Legitimized Genocide".The FDA controls both ends of the spectrum injecting carcinogen Frankenstein ingredients into the mass of consumed foods from the field to the table to generate cancer & the remedy Chemo to shut off the immune system.

  • Over many years we have all been lied to by our Govts. Not just our Govts but by Religous Leaders. We have been taught things that are not in Scripture & many have swallowed many lies by these false prophets. If you are a truth seeker please visit the web site which is displayed in our user name & take the time to read some of the articles.You will be shocked. THERE IS A GREAT AUDIO FOR YOU TO LISTEN TO. You WILL COME AWAY ASKING MANY QUESTIONS. REAL SHOCKING.

    Blessings as you seek truth

  • She's a nut who has caused the deaths of many people who followed her bullshit cures.

    She's an extreme antisemetic who questions the holocaust.

    Oh, yeah. The jews used some kind of high tech jew thing to cause the tsunami in Indonesia. An Islamic country.

    Fraud and insane.

  • i'd like to read about your claims. I think everyone here would find that information pretty valuable. She has proof on her website, but perhaps you have something that would allow me to understand why she is a nut? thanks. I'm being honest not sarcastic.

  • @Reinpret

    Shes telling the Truth about Health

  • @822iam

    For the Truth on Cancer, watch vids by

    LIFE REGENERATOR

  • You people have taken everything she has said out of context ant twisted t all around. She is not a Jew hater, she has told the truth about the Zionist Jews agenda. Telling truth does not make you a jew hater.

  • @keithmysterthegreat.....that is absolutely correct!!!! I as well am for the Jews as a nation but not in agreement with the Zionists agendas which are very dark New Word Order in nature. The Zionists are Jewish Mafia and they are a minute percentage of the Jewish nation by number. Sadly they are extremely powerful and dangerous to everyone around them including the other poor Jews.

  • Sayings things like they are is never wrong but many people are uneducated on the facts and falsely accuse the messengers of evil doings when in fact, the messengers of truth are not the real enemies at all. I wish people would get their facts straight before they attack out of emotion; there would be a whole lot less confusion, anger, & war if people would learn to love the truth and hate the lie. I guess that is just too much to ask in this vile world we live.

  • wow people actually beleive this person she a millionare thru using god as her mantle shes a racist, jew hater people are dying all over the world because this women preaches evil disgusting methods which dont work, yes people she is afraud but she is more than that she is satans daughter doing his work i feel sick she has used the bible in so many nasty ways to benefit herself shame on you, but you will be found out in the long term.

  • Given her feelings about the Jews, I'll bet Hitler would've had "Dr." Day on board during WWII...those concentration camp inmates would've made ideal guinea pigs for her, no doubt.

  • @WhatsAYak

    She coulda been Mengele's assistant!

    What an ugly fat pig she is.

  • Dr day didnt tell you that she did use modern day medicine to remove a tumor that the lord apparantly didnt heal.

  • This woman credits god as healing her...but check her files on quackwatch...she did have a tumor cut out of her and told no one of it....dont know why god didnt get rid of the tumor

  • A 1000 percent mark up on the "Holy Grail" pill would reward the "system" and provide NASA with a cheap method of protecting astronauts from radiation. These motives are contrary to my desire for a quality life.

  • Refrigeration

    Insulation

    Indoor plumbing

    All these are inventions made over the last 100 years and life expectancy has rapidly increased over that period, in large part because of the 3 reasons you just enumerated. In fact since the industrial revolution life expectancies have doubled and now life expectancies are higher than theyve ever been in history.

  • Radiation?

    None greater than that great nuclear fission reactor that crosses the sky every day blanketing everything we call life with its radiation, for the past 4 billion years. Its called the SUN and yes it damages cells.

  • Chemicals?

    When 2 parts hydrogen and one part oxygen combine, we call that a CHEMICAL reaction, the result of which is called WATER. Everything you see around you in nature is a result of a chemical reaction.

  • This is not about life expectancy . It is about the quality of life. What's the use of living till 100 if you are sick and lethargy when you reach 50 years old. How many 50 year old that you see that are fit and enjoying life like climbing mountains, hiking, running on the beach...etc...

  • My teddy bear has never been ill in his life and he has neve reaten aby processed food.

    Coincidence I wonder ?

    Seriously though, I think Dr Day has some very good points but shame she is a bible fan.

  • In the early 1990s Dr Day was capitalizing on the fear of HIV AIDS selling her books and tapes, talking about how to protect yourself from AIDS, because, according to her, you could get AIDS as easy as the common cold. I specifically remember this.

    Dr. Day is a Snake Oil saleswoman.

  • Yeah, I jumped the gun a little by saying that the entire population would be dead.

    If you check the math below I think You'll see that your numbers are quite impossible. Even if you were to substitute the 40 thousand number for the most conservative number, 10 thousand, you will see that your statistic is way off.

    ROLF!

  • Population growth of the last 40 years

    1970 - 203,302,031

    1980 - 226,545,805

    1990 - 248,709,873

    2000 - 281,421,906

    2008 - 303,824,640

  • Assuming that the same pattern continues at a growth in population of an approximate average of 25 million more people each decade, your numbers are still way off. Not only can treatments, like chemotherapy, not be killing this many people, but no sum amount of causes could be causing death at this rate, car wrecks included. The population simply is not growing fast enough.

  • chemotherapy is not poison. this woman is stupid. if every doctor knew that it is poison then wouldnt a GROUP of doctors come forward? and they do know what to do. if it didnt work then the doctors WOULDNT use it.

  • Did you know that this woman claimed in the early 90s that HIV AIDS was an airborne virus?

    Yeah, I'll bet she's not proud of that one now. What a quack she is.

  • she is a quack of all quacks

  • I was put on chemo for osteoporosis. I took 4 weekly doses; and I stopped because it made me sick. Chemo remains in the system for a decade; and it is one of the most toxic substances one can ever put into their body. I refuse to ever take chemotherapy again, no way.

  • "I was put on chemo for osteoporosis."

    Try again Angleblu2042.....Osteoporosis is not Cancer, and Chemo is not an indicated treatment for Osteoporosis.

  • dmo

    Chemotherapy is POISON and an Insane method of treatment that often times is the very REASON the paitent is killed

    Its absolutely Abusrd and ridiculous that this is the treatment used for Cancer, its results are horrendous, i personally have had 3 family members die due to Chemo

  • JetTravoltaLOL:

    What do any of your points have to do with the fact that NOT A DOCTOR Day is a worthless scam artist who is doing more harm than good?

    Seriously, your points about cancer and chemo might be 100% correct, but they have no relevance on whether what MS. Day says is true.

  • "i personally have had 3 family members die due to Chemo "

    No disrespect, but are you really thinking this through?

    Do you seriously think they would have beat cancer without chemo?

  • I am a nurse; and I've had Dr. Days videos and workbook for several years; and I can attest that she is phenominal. She is one of the most innovative and brilliant doctors of our time. I consider her to be at the top. What Dr. Day teaches in her 10-Step process is something that more and more people are discovering, which is saving their lives naturally. In years to come, she will be known as a legacy of her teachings.

  • "I am a nurse........"

    No I don't think that you are.

    A nurse should know better.

  • This woman is insane. My ex-boyfriend's mom tried that old testament cancer cure and she died.

    Also, Lorraine Day has been discredited by all sorts of experts. She believes what she says, but she's confused.

  • Are there any properly conducted trials backing up these claims? Are they peer reviewed? If not, anyone watching this would be more than a little wise to be skeptical.

  • We're all 100% self-healing creatures (although your attitude toward this idea will affect the effectiveness of your body's self-healing mechanism). Day is great but I kinda didn't buy into the idea of going all vegan, raw is the way to stay healthy. Which implies other herbivores never get sick. I can switch to vegan diet right away but I won't be happy; my mental agony will overpower everything else and manifest itself physically in the worst possible way.

  • WOW I am really surprised at the ignorance of people watching this video. There is plenty of proof out there that aids was created in a lab, it targets only(blacks, gays, and drug users) this is sort of the people that our leaders do not want? How naive to think that the medical system is there for you, If that was the case, we would see less dis-ease, instead all degenerative are on the increase! type esoteric agenda, or zeitgeist in youtube, and get informed before making ignorant remarks.

  • It is unlikely that her cancer really recurred. She is lying to people to make money off of their pain. This is shameful. If her system really worked it would be easy with her connections to prove it in a clinical trial. She lost her credentials many years ago by saying the HIV virus was created by the government. Despicable.

  • This stuff is scary-bad. It's lucky that only a fool would buy into this crap. Natural selection strikes again!

  • This lady is KILLING people. She is selling her books and CDs to go against evidence based medicine. She appeals to the gullible religious crowd who think most doctors are out to sell drugs and kill them. This lady thinks she was sent by God but if anything she was sent by the devil. She has the typical anecdotal evidence on her website and does not present real evidence based research papers. If all this works why not do a study to prove it? Simple, it doesn't work.

  • i'm sorry but i just want to tell you. it's not only the cancer that kills you. my aunt had not died from her cancer she died cause of the chemotherapy treatment that the doctors put her through, BECAUSE they had no idea what to do other then this. she had stage 4 cancer. not only did she died of this but while she was alive all her organs failed because of the extreme chemotherapy they put her on. meds aren't always a cure, sometimes they're death.

  • I'm sorry to about what happened to your aunt, but she did have a choice to try to live and die of the cancer or try to get better through chemotherapy. Unfortunately, it was too much and she died. People know that chemotherapy is horrible to go through the problem is that it's the only real treatment. Doctors who get cancer go through it too so you can't say that doctors are holding out on this secret cure because they want money for the chemo.

  • I think it's a broad misunderstanding on how we figure out ways to help or cure diseases. We have to go through double blind trials to make sure the treatment is legitimate. Chemotherapy statically saves more people than it kills. Obviously, the chances of surviving greatly decrease as a function of time without treatment. That's why people like Dr. Day are so harmful, because they prevent people from getting actual treatment.

  • Listen, I'm going to medical school and you have to understand that the medical doctors and researchers are mostly good people trying to save lives. They have loved ones who die of cancer and horrible diseases too. Occasionally, you can get a bad doctor, but that applies to all walks of life. Dr Day provide a nice new age feel good method that sounds better than chemotherapy, the only problem is that it doesn't work. Flat out. People please use simple logic to realize this.

  • If your medical school is the be all and all of all cure you shouldn't worry about alternative treatment methods like this or are you that insecure? Either way as a man of science you should advocate for different point of view otherwise science wouldn't grow. Zoom out, you're standing too close, you have lost your perspective. I understand you doctors have good intentions otherwise you wouldn't be in this profession (for the most part) but have humans utilized our natural body to its limits?

  • Whoa hold on. I NEVER would say medical school is the be all end all for cures. Only the alternative medicine crowd believes that alternative medicine can cure all diseases. I love alternative points of views and if you knew me you'd realize how much I like to think outside the box. I'm an electrical engineering student (going to medical school after). Electrical engineers definitely think different. The problem is that people don't even do actual science.

  • It's great to have new fun idea's. But you have to test your ideas with reality. This is where alternative medicine gets in trouble. They start with a conclusion (ie fruits and vegetables cure cancer), and when we test it against reality it simply doesn't work. Then instead of thinking of something else, they will just keep pressing the failed idea and any negative results they throw away and make some excuse that big pharma is evil them and just a bunch of lame rationalizations.

  • Chemotherapy is not the answer to recover from cancer. Look in the official oncology book 2002 (Dr. Mercola has a copy of the page) for true cure rates after 5 years of taking chemo. The overall percentage of survivors is only 2% for all listed types of cancer!! With those kinds of statistics, why not look at ways for the body to heal itself naturally? Cancer Tutor . com reviews top natural CURES and they are often more than 90% if the person hasn't had chemo, which destroys the immune system.

  • It is clear that you are blind to what is really going on in the medical business, but life has a funny way to wake us up when the time is right. I am sorry to say that what you think is the truth now, will look very different to you in a few years!

  • you may want to watch this on youtube:

    Preview of interview with Da Vid, if you really want to know whats going on. Your choice head in the sand, or eyes open and see the light!

    Peace man~

  • Thank you, Dr. Day!! I greatly admire this woman and her stand for the truth. Our body will heal of almost anything when we feed it what it needs. There are thousands of testimonials of people who have been cured of cancer naturally. There are pictures online of Dr. Day's massive tumor, and it sure wasn't a figment of her imagination! I'd take natural cures any day to the 2% chemo rates after 5 years!! You don't take poison if you want a strong healthy body, and that's common sense.

  • It IS common sense. However, natural beings aren't as black and white. It's possible to condition your body to withstand harsh effects of even the deadliest of poisons. It's possible her 'believing in' the natural system (placebo, unconscious has complete control over every cell) cured her cancer, its also possible natural system do cure cancer regardless (improbable), again its also possible something else has cured her cancer without her knowledge coincidentally she was on her natural cure.

  • Also check out here on YT a video titled

    PROTEIN MYTH by Raw Vegan TIM VAN ORDEN !

  • Greg, No i didnt give you the Negative ! We are on the same team bro . I appreciate the Work you are doing to try to enlighten other people as to the TRUTH of Dr. Days Mssg.

    A great book that fully exposes the Hoax of Medicine and all their Death Dealing Lies is written by Dr. Mendelsohn titled

    CONFESSIONS OF A MEDICAL HERETIC, i highly reccomend this book, it is outstanding showing how bruttaly horrible Medicine is.

  • You Have Cancer. You're Going to Die!

    triple w dot drday dot com slash tumor dot htm

  • rawfamily dot com

  • I work in a wound clinic. The cancer patients that I know who have chemo are all dead but 1.

    I had skin cancer that the doctors removed by surgery twice. It came back both times after I was told it was "clear".

    I used an old native rememdy and cured it.

    I then began researching other cures that are hidden from us.

    Alternative methods may not work for all, but please look into all options! Science changes!!!

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Have u ever had cancer? If so,have you been

    through chemo? You Truly feel as if u r being

    poisoned, can't taste any thing,your nail beds

    turn black, ur ears ring and it's a horrible,horrible feeling!

  • therealsabdominguez

    What do any of your points have to do with the fact that NOT A DOCTOR Day is a worthless scam artist who is doing more harm than good?

    Seriously, your points about cancer and chemo might be 100%, but they have no relevance on whether what MS. Day says is true.

  • DMosier; Your comment makes me shudder . The worse kind of human is one that ridicules without facts . What are you opinions based upon ?

  • One:

    "The worse(sic) kind of human..."

    Are you really saying that murders, rapists, suicide bombers and child molesters are not as bad as "...one that ridicules without facts." ??

    Really?

    Two: I watched her entire series of videos on YT, Read her site, the Wikipedia page on her and searched Google for relevant articles both for and against NOTADr. Day. Spent the beter part of the afternoon and evening looking into it. 2 family members have cancer and I would love nothing more then to help them

  • So splatuality...since I have done what I think is a reasonable amount of research on NOTDr. Day BEFORE I came to my conclusion I guess I did not "...ridicules without facts."

    What was your point?...

  • dmosier, you are incorrect. Dr. Day is not worthless. She is not a scam artist, and she is doing nothing but good. I've taken chemo and I will never take it again. I followed the diet of Dr. Day and her introducing me to the spiritual aspect. I assure it she is 100% RIGHT! I know because I've lived it.

  • I was so happy to know this info about deseases and health i am now a vegetrain i know she sayd to be a vegan but i find it very hard to be one when the choice is only soy and D.r Day says soy is bad for you dose anyone know how i can make the switch and still enjoy my food.

  • My mother followed Dr. Day's advice and her cancer progressed rapidly. She died within 9 months of her stage IV breast cancer diagnosis. Her choice to follow Dr. day's plan produced some tragic consequences. I don't pretend to know the truth, bu If you know someone who is seriously considering this plan, please contact me first to hear my story.

  • wow am so sorry but i would like to point out that sometimes its too late i uderstnad how you feel my best friends father died of cancer but he had it for five years so yeah it all depends on how long you have had it

  • By the way, if you're looking for science based treatments, you won't find that in conventioanl medicine. Chemo, radiation and surgery have all been debunked as quackery by solid independant science. They are all worthless as cancer treatment because: Chemo and radiation both CAUSE cancer and end up killing you, and none of them address the cause of cancer (vitamin deficiencies, excess toxins, and stress).

  • There is no evidence that vitamin deficiencies are a primary cause of cancer. What are "excess toxins?" I love how people use nonsense labels. you might as well call it "bad stuff," or whatever. Now stress on the other hand has been linked to disease. I'm not sure about cancer, but I would not be surprised. You say some pretty wild reckless stuff aabsc, what is your motivation?

  • My motivation is helping people stop getting exploited by medicine which purposefully kill between 10,000 and 40,000 people PER DAY to profit from their disease. That's like 9/11 occuring almost once every single hour. The cure to all diseases is known: a raw food diet as nature intended, health is unachievable eating cooked food.

  • There is tons of evidence vitamin deficiencies are among main cancer causes. Vitamin D deficiency (from sunlight exposure) alone has been shown to be the cause of at least 77% of cancer cases in a recent study. Vitamin B17 is also required daily in the diet for cancer prevention.

  • Where did you get the idea that sunlight exposure causes vitamin D deficiency? You do realize that Vitamin D occurs naturally as a result of being exposed to the sun, right? Sunlight exposure is related to skin cancer, but what does this have to do with Dr. Day releasing her records in the interest of full disclosure and truth? You digress and divert.

  • As for vitamin D, exposure to sunlight increases the Vitamin D level in our body, opposite to what you say. Also, there are vitamines in cooked food, much less then in raw of course. The longer you cook, the less vitamines there are in the food, but they dont vaporize instantly.

  • The fact you don't know what toxins are shows how you know nothing about health. Toxins are the known carcinogens (pest/herb/fung-icides) that are sprayed on all non-organic fruits and vegetables, also 99% of products in grocery stores have at least one or more known cancer causing chemicals in them (no wonder 1 out of 2 people have cancer since 2005).

  • aabsc says "Chemo, radiation and surgery have all been debunked as quackery by solid independant science"

    Please state your source for this 'solid independant(sic) science'.

    I would like to read the paper for my self.

  • Those treatments are studied ONLY as to whether or not they shrink tumor size, they are NEVER study on whether they extend life or not and in the best and rare cases it only adds 1-2 months of life (while causing immense suffering) and in many cases it has been shown to shorten life by 4 times compared to no treatment at all. Chemotherapy is well proven to be a powerful carcinogen and causes cancer, cancer is one of the main side effects of chemo and radiation, so it cannot cure cancer.

  • Comment removed

  • LexPhilogus: You seem to have forgotten the very obviuous fact that new people are born every day also, so no, the entire population would not be dead in 10 years. At least 9 out of 10 deaths are caused by the health care system. And the numbers I posted come straight from modern medicine's own studies, so if anything, it's worst than what they say. The deaths I posted are not only cancer deaths, they are deaths caused by all drugs, surgeries, etc combined.

  • In otherwards youre saying that there will be only 187 million people in the United States in 2016. Assumed population growth in the next decade 30 million (which is above the decade average of the last 40 years)

    (30 million + 303 million) - [40,000 X 365(10)] = 187 million people by 2016

  • "Those treatments are studied ONLY as to whether or not they shrink tumor size"

    Okay this is a ridiculous statement. A tumor is a collection of cancer cells, so by definition, reducing tumor size would be reducing the number of cancer cells in the body, thereby extending life.

    The only way that a patient has any chance of surviving is by getting rid of cancer cells. Chemo is one method of doing that.

    I can guarantee that if you do not kill the cancer cells you will die.

  • Your immune system knows how to kill cancer cells if you feed it properly and stop eating cancer causing food which 99.9% of people do at every single meal, if you don't stop eating cancer causing food you won't be cured. Chemo also kills healthy cells faster than it kills cancer cells, which is why most people die of chemo before the cancer kills them. One recent study showed that about 30% of cancer patients are killed by the chemo in the first 30 days of treatment.

  • Your immune system knows how to kill cancer cells if you feed it properly and stop eating cancer causing food which 99.9% of people do at every single meal, if you don't stop eating cancer causing food you won't be cured

    Where is the Data to support this conjecture?

    Data Data Data ?

    How many people have tried this? Cite credible sources.

  • Just look at the studies done on al lchemicals added to our food and it is well known that almost anything cooked will form many carcinogens during cooking, not only that but cooking destroys the anti cancer property of foods, so that makes them doubly carcinogenic. The studies showing raw fruits and vegetables prevent and reverse/cure cancer are endless.

    I myself am cured of an "incurable" disease which I would have suffered from all my life had I taken chemo and listened to doctors.

  • "Chemotherapy is well proven to be a powerful carcinogen and causes cancer"

    Seriously, your comments are absurd.

    It would be like blaming a person for jumping out of an airplane as the cause of death, after the engines on the plane failed, and their parachute failed to open after leaping.

    You forget the obvious fact that people jump out of planes in emergency situations because they have no other options.

  • There are far more effective and science based options to curing cancer, chemo is just the most popular because it's by far the most profitable. The most effective cancer treatments and cures are completely free and supported by much more solid science (the only "science" supporting chemo is made directly by the ones selling it, no independant study supports chemo, and even company studies are only made about shrinking tumors, not extending life, unbiased studies show chemo also shrinks life).

  • "There are far more effective and science based options to curing cancer"

    Let's see them. We're all holding our breath, no doubt.

  • Who is limiting their options?

    According to you the earth is still flat.

    Exposure to radiation damages cells... How hard is that to understand?

    Man made chemicals damage cells.

    Your logic would conclude the best cure for aids is a bullet to the brain.

    Do No Harm...

  • dmosier:You say Dr Day is causing harm,what proof do you have that anyone died because of what she says? On the other hand,it is very well proven that conventional doctors kill from 10,000 to 40,000 patients per day with their treatments,thats like 9/11 occuring 4 to 16 times every single day,why are you not saying anything about the millions of people convetional doctors have and will continue to kill?Why is it acceptable that a conventional dr kills patients and not get jailed as they deserve?

  • Even if we considered the most conservative number that you just gave of 10,000 deaths per day, that would come out to 10,000 X 365 equals 3,650,000. That would be over three times the amount of people diagnosed with cancer in 2008.

  • Again, the numbers I gave are all deaths caused by modern medicine (drugs, surgeries, etc.), not only deaths related to cancer.

  • Comment removed

  • If her alternative methods worked so much better, then she would be the wealthiest most prolific Doctor in the world. There's your proof.

    The probability that cancer untreated will kill you is 100%. The probability that any given cancer will kill you while taking standard treatment may be very high.

    In that case it would be the cancer that killed you in spite of the treatment, instead of the treatment that killed you in spite of the cancer.

  • You are clearly a very gullible person. Dr. Day's science based cure is 100% freely accessible to all persons on earth. There is ZERO profit to be made in curing cancer, treating cancer however makes $300,000 per patient on average, it's a billion dollar industry that would be wiped off if the cured was known to all. The probability that cancer will kill you is not 100%, many have cancer come and go with no treatments at all.

  • "many have cancer come and go with no treatments at all. "

    Not as gullible as your absurd numbers.

    Actually it would make someone extremely wealthy.

    Shows how much you know about Economics.

    Assuming that she had a method to better treatment she would essentially corner the market in a monopoly with her method due to success rate.

    If she were giving it out for free, the success rate would essentially bankrupt the cancer treatment industry.

    That has not happened.

  • You must be a doctor to know so little about health right?

    My numbers are all independant/unbiased scienced based, all your numbers come straight from someone selling something.

    Have you even watched Dr. Day's videos? Her proven cancer cure is nothing other than a diet and lifestyle change, it's not something you can sell and make money with, it's impossible to make money with it as everyone can change their diet and lifestyle absolutely free.

  • " numbers come straight from someone selling something."

    Straight off of Dr. Days website...

    One of the most frightening thoughts a person can have is that of going blind. To lose one's eyesight is a catastrophe that changes every aspect of one's life. Lorraine Day, M.D. reveals the amazingly simple plan to prevent and reverse serious eye diseases that affect almost 50% of all Americans over the age of 65 and often lead to severe vision loss and even blindness.

    CD or Audiotape

    $21.95

  • The studies Dr Day cites are unbiased, the studies medical doctors are shown during their "education" are all from people selling something. You do not need Dr. Day to find the same unbiased studies she has found to cure herself, I found them and cured myself long before hearing of Dr. Day.

  • " numbers come straight from someone selling something."

    Straight off of Dr. Days website...

    One of the most frightening thoughts a person can have is that of going blind. To lose one's eyesight is a catastrophe that changes every aspect of one's life. Lorraine Day, M.D. reveals the amazingly simple plan to prevent and reverse serious eye diseases that affect almost 50% of all Americans over the age of 65 and often lead to severe vision loss and even blindness.

    CD or Audiotape

    $21.95

  • How many people have tried this? Cite credible sources.

    I found them and cured myself long before hearing of Dr. Day.

    This is not Data. This anecdotal evidence.

    You keep referring to Dr. Day's sources, without naming them.

  • You could tell me that you saw pigs fly yesterday and I could not prove you wrong. However, your claim would not be sufficient evidence for the conclusion that pigs did indeed fly.

    You have to give sources of data to support your claims.

  • "My numbers are all independant/unbiased scienced based, all your numbers come straight from someone selling something."

    Why don't you get off of youtube for a while and actually publish your findings. You'll be a hero, your name will be remembered for centuries, and your research topics will be funded for generations.

    I'm sure you'll come through...

  • They are not my findings and they are already published. You are a moron if you think the doctors that made these discoveries would be called heros, they are all called quacks and ridiculed because they treathen the $2 Trillion yearly profit of modern medicine. Curing diseases is 100% free and won't make a single penny to anyone, only letting people suffer and die from their diseases is profitable through deadly drugs and worthless surgeries.

  • "..they are already published."

    Then you can provide references, no doubt.

    "Curing diseases is 100% free.."

    No doubt insurance companies will be thrilled to have a reference to your "published" findings as well. They can save all sorts of money on expensive treatments and thereby increase their margins.

    Enough with all of this nonsense. What, exactly, are you basing your claims on?

  • You are clearly an extremely gullible and easily manipulated person. My own life depended on this and that's why I'm cured of 3 incurable diseases since many years now which I would still be suffering or have died from if I had been stupid enough to trust doctors. How do you expect insurance companies to make money if the treatments are completely free? What do you not understand about the fact that something freely accessible to all cannot make profit and insurance companies would also vanish.

  • "..I'm cured of 3 incurable diseases.."

    If I were an "extremely gullible and easily manipulated person", I'd believe you. To be blunt, I don't. Anecdotes are next to worthless in science.

    "How do you expect insurance companies to make money if the treatments are completely free?"

    Diagnostics.

    Accident/trauma.

    Dental care.

    Proper dietary/exercise advising (IE your unproven "cancer cure").

    OBGYN.

    Want more?

  • Diagnostics: Nope, all diseases can be prevented and require no diagnostics to be cured.

    Accident/trauma: What does this have to do with diseases? Nothing.

    Dental care: Cavities are also prevented with healthy diet.

    Vitamin D alone (free from sunshine exposure without sunscreen) is proven to prevent up to 77% of all cancer cases, it also prevents MS, diabetes, and many other diseases. You can easily find endless studies that prove this.

  • "Nope, all diseases can be prevented and require no diagnostics to be cured."

    Evidence, please.

    "Cavities are also prevented with healthy diet."

    Evidence, please.

    "Vitamin D alone (free from sunshine exposure without sunscreen) is proven to prevent up to 77% of all cancer cases, it also prevents MS, diabetes, and many other diseases."

    Evidence, please.

  • Think about this for a minute: Why are you not looking for the studies I'm referring to yourself.

    And most importantly, why are you trusting doctors trying to sell you something (drugs, surgery, etc.) without requiring any evidence at all yet for honest unbiased sources you want to see all evidence? If you want evidence you should be requiring evidence for the treatments you stupidly believe in too, and there is none.

  • "Why are you not looking for the studies I'm referring to yourself."

    For the same reason I'm not out searching for evidence of bigfoot, alien abductions, Zeus, unicorns, or Santa Claus. It is incumbent on the one making the claim to provide evidence for the claim.

    "If you want evidence you should be requiring evidence"

    Our increasing lifespans and successful treament or eradication of diseases are quite telling WRT measuring the successes of medical science. Nice try, though.

  • Our increasing lifespans is well over, life expectancy has been falling for several years already thanks to the 10,000 to 40,000 people that are killed by modern medicine. Explain this: The USA uses the most modern medicine and has the lowest life expectancy and highest disease rates of developped countries and Hunza has no hospitals, no doctors, no drugs and yet they have no diseases and live well past 100 on average. Your delusions can't stand up to science and solid facts.

  • "..life expectancy has been falling for several years already.."

    Evidence, please.

    "The USA uses the most modern medicine and has the lowest life expectancy and highest disease rates of developped countries.."

    Evidence, please.

    "..Hunza.. live well past 100 on average."

    Evidence, please.

    "Your delusions can't stand up to science and solid facts."

    Perhaps we'd know if you actually managed to come up with any.

  • "10,000 to 40,000 people that are killed by modern medicine. "

    A total missapropriation of causation.

    Look up Post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.

    40,000 people get sick and modern medical science resorts to drastic measures to save them.

    You have no evidence for your counterfactual.

  • WEll said Lex

  • Also, for the time where our life expectancy was infact rising it had nothing do with with modern medicine as there was nearly none at that time. The lifespan was increasing due to better nutrition and better hygene. It is now falling do to our nutrition being at the worst it's ever been and modern medicine being more corrupt and deadly than ever. Every single time modern medicine goes on strike there is a dramatic fall in death rates. Without modern medicine we'd all be living well past 100.

  • "Every single time modern medicine goes on strike there is a dramatic fall in death rates."

    Evidence, please.

  • To my knowledge there is a solid consensus among historians, archeologists, anthropologists and any other member of a field that is interested in such matters, that life expectancy precipitously began to rise after the industrial and scientific revolutions.

    Your logic requires that all these University intellectuals even outside the medical industry are colluding together in some vast conspiracy.

  • But... "modern medicine" can go "on strike" (resulting in "a dramatic fall in death rates"). ;)

    It's obviously a monolithic effort. Scientists never compete with each other, and of course insurance companies never interact with health care providers (attempting to find cheaper treatments, for example).

  • Refrigeration transportation and indoor toilets have all conspired to lengthen our lives. An artificial mild climate makes it easier for an old body to keep moving. Your stop moving and you die.

  • Endless studies on animals and some on humans show that a raw food diet causes animals to live in perfect health with no diseases, as soon as a living being eats cooked food they get all diseases that humans have. You cannot avoid diseases unless you are on a raw food diet. Period.

  • "Endless studies on animals and some on humans show that a raw food diet causes animals to live in perfect health with no diseases, as soon as a living being eats cooked food they get all diseases that humans have. You cannot avoid diseases unless you are on a raw food diet. Period."

    So let's see the studies. If they're "endless", you're bound to cite just one, right?

  • Here's one of many:

    naturalnews [dot] com/023401.html

  • Assessment:

    No controls described, no disease prevalences detailed, no description of exact populations, no number of trials described, no exact description of diets and actual food intake, no description of habitats... I need not go on.

    I tried to find some of the original "study" to no avail. Is this an actual experiment or just something someone out there in internet land made up? Without evidence, I'm going with the latter. Nice try though, when you have actual evidence, get back with me.

  • Look at the pottenger cat study then.

  • Someone else tried to pull that one on me a while back. This one is probably even worse than the one you cited previously.

    The feline taurine requirement was not known nor was it accounted for in the experiments. Cats do not synthesize taurine, as we do. Taurine deficiency induces a number of pathologies in cats that are similar to those reported by Pottenger.

    There's a wonderful writeup on this "experiment" on the "beyondveg" site. It details the problems with this experiment. Try again.

  • You know, you've inspired me... I'm going to create a new video series honoring the late Carl Sagan and his idea of a "baloney detection kit" (as outlined in "The Demon-Haunted World"). Thanks for the idea...

  • Tell me how profiting off of research is the litmus test by which you judge other's scientific credibility, when it is okay for Dr. Day to do so with her credibility remaining intact.

  • I'm basing my claims on independant science, unlike you who blindly believes anyone trying to sell you something when they have absolutely no independant science. Try to find a single independant study that shows chemo extends life more than diet changes and exercises. Diet and exercise are far more efficient, and for the last time, diet and exercise changes are free and you don't need doctors, insurance or drugs. Cancer is caused by bad diet and lack of exercise, the only cure is proper diet+ex

  • "I'm basing my claims on independant science.."

    Sources, please, then we'll talk.

  • I really don't understand why you think that eating healthy raw food is some kind of novel revolutionary cure just discovered by DR. Day.

    Practically every biology, dietician, medical journal corroborates that many diseases can be prevented by good eating habits and regular exercise.

    It's just that after being diagnosed with lung cancer, we don't think that eating broccoli and mustard greens alone is going to do the trick.

  • no, you are right, it isn't a new idea eating healthy, but people eat crap food and get ill. There are so many foods out there with additives in them that can lead to all sorts of problems. Aspertine is the most common. so if you already have cancers etc and you dont eat or drink right then it's just going to kill you faster.

    Ok I don't have a disease but I did used to be considerably overweight and have asthma and since eating raw food (juices, salads etc) I am slim and asthama free. :-)

  • People rarely think of both costs and benefits on issues like this.

    The truth of the matter is that it probably does not make a big difference. People live longer now days than they did in the days that additives were not put in food.

    This is not to imply that the additives themselves are healthy but that they probably protect you from worse kinds of illnesses that get into food.

  • Refrigeration

    Home heating

    Indoor PLUMBING!

    Insulation

    Need I say more?

    Chemicals and radiation damage cells...

    Who ever got the stupid moronic idea they can cure anything?

    Want a cure for aids? Try arsenic....

    They do it for profit...

  • They do it for profit

    So what? Dr. Day does what she does for profit. Ive been through this already.

  • To do NO harm...Does this phrase sound familiar to you?

    Chemo and Radiation do what to a person?

    Why not shoot he cancer cells with a shotgun?

    Or boil the person in oil? This would surely kill the cancer cells.

    What oath do doctors take?

  • Cure anything?

    Ever since the mapping of the human genome, scientists now know what the genetic causes behind aging are. In fact its highly likely that there will be a cure for aging or at least therapies for slowing the process down to a crawl within this century. If we can cure aging I see no reason why all diseases that ail humans couldnt be eradicated.

  • Well, I'm sure that additives are not the best thing in the world. But consider the fact that additives are likely there for a reason and probably have something to do with preserving the food so that you do not get some even worse disease from spoiled food.

  • Your understanding of politics is about as correct as your knowledge of economics...LOLDo you work for the Cancer Industry?

    When we stop paying doctors to search for a cure and start paying them to cure cancer...The brutality will stop!

  • not all treatment/surgery is bad

  • I'd recommend you search video dot google dot com for the video "World Without Cancer".

  • By the way how do you explain this: I knew about 11 people who got cancer, about 5 of them went the natural, honest route of diet change, etc. that Dr. Day recommends and are all completely cured and have stayed cured ever since. The others who where, like you, gullible enough to think chemo would provide any benefit, where rapidly killed. I know what Dr. Day says is true and based on science, and that conventional treatments will kill anyone foolish enough to beleive in such cruel quackery.

  • Your anecdotal experience is hardly scientific evidence. I firmly believe what Dr. Day says is a lie. Yet neither of us have evidence because Dr. Day is not a scientist and has not produced any data. She does not follow her patients and has now idea who dies or who survives. She probably does not care. She is interested in propaganda and making money selling her videos, not science or truth. Do your research before following her advice.