consequence, a more pacifist and longer-lasting society! I militate for a democratic communist system which would, if not cancel, at least delay the destruction of our civilization by centuries or millenniums, (we can't predict when an asteroid might hit us, so...) and at a political level, I support a secular,anti-sexist and anti-racist society,so I don't give a damn about patriarchy and matriarchy unless they are supported by too many people and become dangerous!I'm a communist,not a feminist!
world's oil in the 2050s or even the destruction of life on Earth in less than 100 years if it keeps the present rate of deforestation! We need a conscious economic system which would preserve nature and increase agricultural production by modernizing already existent farms or by developing urban alimentary industries, and one which would plan the economical activity so that we could make the transition to infinite energy resources, (like solar, eolian and geothermal electricity) and, in
moral society which assures the survival of the human race and its prosperity, like, for example, challenging the economical system. Capitalism is powered by the greedy and selfish profit motive, and it does not act in a rational way of preserving humanity, but actually in a very wasteful way of profit-gaining (thus extracting resources to their extinction and cutting forests everywhere for agricultural and urban expansion), and it will inevitably generate huge financial crises by finishing the
privileged races and oppressed races, that system would have a privileged sex and an oppressed sex. Such models of government were represented in the past by patriarchies, but they would be just as bad in a matriarchal form, so we must seek to maintain a system which provides the purest possible form of gender equality. Everything out of this boundaries is sexist and immoral, but matriarchy is not a serious problem in our society for now, so we should have other priorities if we want to create a
the average women a 100 IQ, but yet, there are very much women who have a better IQ score than 102, and some even get over 180...), and if you make the same test after a few generations or in a different location you might just get the opposite result, so NO SOCIETY SHOULD BE BUILT ON GENDER INEQUALITY PRINCIPLES, and if it is, there is no doubt that it would be very immoral and oppressive! Such a society would be just as immoral as a fascist state, with the only difference that instead of
Tesla were intelligent), and the fact that women waged almost no wars doesn't mean that they are more pacifist or a better gender (it just means women ruled countries very few times in history...).
Even if a gender is indeed, on the average, more intelligent, more empathic, more peaceful or has a better memory than the other, the difference would be very small, in real life there would be very much exceptions from the theoretical case (for example, the average men is taught to have a 102 IQ and
"who's the better gender?" game, and all I am criticizing is capitalism! The feminists used to do it too back in the days when their movement wasn't a sexist joke, so you can criticize them as much as you want. I'm not against it! Every single individual on this planet is different, and the fact that men invented most of the electronic and industrial devices we use doesn't mean that they are actually more intelligent or a better gender (it just means that some men, like Einstein, Kant, Marx or
@gamenode: Did I mention the world "patriarchy"? Did I? You must be either mentally retarded or blind to see my comment as a pro-matriarchy statement. (or maybe sleepy) That was an ironic comment addressed to feminists because their movement once started as an egalitarian socialist one, and now they are concerned with stupid sexist right-wing principles like "matriarchies". Your arguments do not harm my theory at all, because I'm an egalitarian and I don't care about your childish
Despite the feminist propaganda to the contrary a 2007 CDC report shows that women commit the majority of domestic violence. Unilateral violence which is most depicted in DV PSA's is committed by women 70% of the time.
Women also abuse children at twice the rate as men and murder more children than men.
In men's area of influence (resource gathering) men commit more violence and crime. In women's area of influence (family/relations) women commit the majority of crime but aren't accountable.
The feminists claim that women were property and had no rights etc.
In fact, women had superior rights to males. Married women could not be charged with a crime or sued. Her husband would be charged for all her crimes including murder and treason. He was also responsible for all her debts and could be imprisoned for life if he couldn't pay them. No matter what she did he had to support her for life even after divorce.
In this arrangement tell me honestly who is the property?
Recently Catherine Kieu poisoned her husband. While unconscious she tied him to a bed then woke him up so she could cut off his penis. Then she threw the penis in the garbage disposal. When the women of "The Talk" discussed this on CBS they cheered this act of sexual and domestic violence. Millions of women agreed.
When have men ever cheered the mutilation of a woman for no good reason? Women are not superior to men and more power for women will mean more violence for men.
The U.S. is already a matriarchal society. Women are a majority vote and elect those politicians, male and female who they think will serve their interests best.
The result? 7 million men in prison. Women avoid legal accountability for crimes including murder. Men are denied equal reproductive rights, parental rights, property rights. The nation buckles under the weight of entitlements and has marginalized its best workers with affirmative action and preferential treatment for women.
The argument that Margaret Thatcher was a product of the "Patriarchy" is WEAK.That same "Patriarchy" produced William Wilberforce who was responsible for the abolition of the slave trade and the institution of slavery.It produced Abraham Lincoln,who would have given women the vote if events of greater urgency hadn't arisen,and Aneurin Bevan who established the NHS.Women who would have died in childbirth in 1900 were surviving it in 1950 and on average outliving men because of the "Patriarchy".
Hotep.I, the General supports this message!!! I am feeling this video.If you check out my page you will see that I have fought for this higher worldview.I have in my own community showed and proved that the woman was created as a higher being from the great mama.We must put mama back on her thrown!!!!!!!!!!!!
entrepreneurs) destroy our environment, exploit every last drop of oil on this planet and cut down half of the forests of the Earth in less than a century for developing agricultural industries. (all this accelerated destruction of the environment started in the 50s, so it is actually a lifetime in which we destroyed the Earth more than in 6000 years of history) How I already said: nice! Keep the good job, feminist movement! You will soon rule a wasteland called Earth!
Evil patriarchy destroyed the land? And yet it is women who control 85% of domestic spending. Women created the consumer demand that mowed down the forests and created ecological destruction. And what would they care so long as they got their plastic shoes, pencil skirts, and accessories. Who does the most animal testing? Why it's the consumer cosmetic industry driving by female consumers.
3 times as much retail space is given to female merchandise than male. Who has the power?
big industrial corporations, and the liberals of the world are concerned with ideas like matriarchy or patriarchy (which doesn't exist anymore)...
Nice! I'm interested in how women will rule a world with no resources, world-wide starvation because of too much population, and much bigger oceans which would rise over New York or Tokyo...This social discriminatory ideas are keeping the liberals busy with fictional conspirative theories while the rich (no matter if they are men or women
Any ideology which clearly states the control of one gender/race/nation/religion over the other ones is dictatorial and will never work. The job of the government is the political and economical situation of the nation, not the social life, since any government which has established social restrictions or favoured some groups of individuals turned out to be dictatorial. The ice caps of the world are melting because of the hungry for power capitalist system and the pollution generated by the
I hate patriarchy with a passion. It is the evil I know. I'm not particularly keen on the idea of matriarchy though. I really don't want a class ruling me. I support something more like llibertarian democracy, where it is irrelevant which gender the leaders are and the leaders don't have much power but they keep the group together and cooperating.
welcome to the new tyranny. same as the old tyranny. the hypocrisy is clear: to hate patriarchy yet promote matriarchy is like saying that true equality for african americans would be to allow them to enslave whites for a few millenia. your cause is nothing less than the assurance that the pendulum will continue to swing between this or that inequity for the entirity of human history.
@knowthingman That's true, exactly true. It's as sick as 2+2=5. It bears note, however, that men naturally are inclined to lead and women are naturally inclined to follow. That is how we were made. All women want to be protected and loved, and all men want to be independent and take care of a woman. Anything else is a futile attempt to deviate from biology.
i think this is why a small group of men are, and have been, behind the feminist movement from the beginning. they see the potential benefit from societies fractured along sex and race lines. i wonder what women would think if they knew their own movement was directed mainly by a small group of powerful and rich men, largely for the purpose of maintaining their own power and profit?
The word is out about the plastic degrading into xenoestrogens in the water, which androgynizes men and women, while giving them cancer. Every law of physics and chemistry and everything else are linked, and the androgyny is cancer. It is death, and that is what is being advocated by feminism. When you push too far, you will be shut down by men, and you won't control the world. I can guarantee you that. If we get really lucky, perhaps the women will cast you out as well: I hope.
The breakdown of modern western society exists as a direct result of a breakdown in gender roles, which entails the breakdown of the family. Men usually lead. Women usually follow. Feminism has not presented equality. It's given us the Duluth model, child support tyranny, and divorces that encourage women to use their children as bargaining tools--and it's her right to kill them, too, isn't it? This is tax-funded, and women have shut up and walked right in, just like you were supposed to.
Sometimes intentionally, often by habit, men have worked to keep Us separated. There are entire sections of the planet where nations treat Woman like cattle. Men who dont see this are living in a bubble. Patriarchies are not necessarily evil, but they are distortions of nature, and lead to evil outcomes so easily. Once all nations...all humanity...comes together and recognizes that treatment of Woman must be elevated to a very very high level...we will have Matriarchy.
The Universe runs on Balance, and that includes female and male energy, but the way that energy works together can be very different. I am not a Female Supremacist (though I get mistaken for one sometimes) but I do believe men have their part to play by working together and cooperating (as opposed to fighting and trying to control/separate Us). Cooperation leads to peace. A unifying peace can come about if men learn to unite in one great way: loving Us.
Much depth of right and wrong in these comments. Matriarchy is a broad term, as Feminism has become. New terms will come along. Societies change...evolution continues....Woman has the skill, talent and heart (and Destiny) to lead this world and its odd how some men are incapable of visualizing this. Reads like defensiveness and arrogance. Men have done much to evolve the world this far.....in wonderful ways....but like children grow up, so must humanity. The future demands greater Sisterhood.
I'm for gender equity. I don't see how matriarchal rule by women has any more to do with equity than patriarchy. If you advocate rule by women without any pretenses at equality between the sexes then at least you're consistent.
@MichaelManners101 You say: " So much beauty brings tears to my eyes when unbalanced by the maleimages of war and violence." Yes, oh so horrid those males are, fighting for territory and resources to give to females..What horrid disgusting creatures men are.....
YOU MICHEAL are the most self loathing worm of a man I've ever met.. Go ahead, stop competing with other males and see how far it gets you... Male male competition is brutal and an ultimately constructive element of our nature.
The term "politically correct" originated in the Russian Communist Party in the 1920's. It usage in America today illustrates the extent society has been subverted. Feminist activists are mostly Communist dupes. The Communist goal is to destroy Western Civilization, which is dedicated to genuine diversity (pluralism), individual liberty and equal opportunity (but not equal outcomes).
What about the fact that women are racist, homophobic and generally intolerant? This is a function of their sexual conservatism and elitism. Obviously, racism is an ideological expression of sexual conservatism. Men are less racist because of their sexual profligacy.
Also, note how this video only focuses on MIDDLE CLASS, educated women, not the illiterate, intolerant commonweal - the oldest feminist trick in the book.
Men and women both share the same exact emotions and urges. To suggest otherwise isnt keeping with sound reasoning.
That said, we all are capable of the same things and that has been proven by time. Fighting each other over who is more evil or good is a total waste of time.
It doesnt offend me that somebody thinks the world would be better if women ran it. I know that that is supremely ignorant.
You all talk of this matriarchy of yours, but you have no clue how long men have had to live without our leadership. Hell Babylon, was a matriarchy, and that was literally half of human history, by itself, let alone the Celts, or the Empresses and Queens. Every last one of you is controlling and power hungry, and it shows! It is no coincidence that more than half of human history has been run by you, and yet you still blame us for the frailties of your lives. Make no mistake, you sicken us.
So you are saying that babylon was a matriarchy? I guess youve just admitted that women aim to violently kill of massive amounts of people and dominate. Hmm i guess you did study up on babylon trying to kill of all the Jews and ending taking them all as slaves. I guess you women have lied again about women being "non-violent".
In the second part of this series we will get to see what non-traditional women look like (every remotely Westernized woman on the planet) and what kind of activities they typically engage in.
Their should be more of these videos, this is what the world needs. if you want to overcome a world dominated by violence/hatred, then you must make sure there's either a equal amount of females in all positions of power, or more. It's that simple.
Women have the tendency to be just as violent as men and just as hateful as well. We do need more female leadership but more importantly we need more non violent leadership i dont care what genetalia they have. The idea that women are kinder gentler and better is the same excuse they used to say we should only raise children. If we make kindness & gentleness female traits are we not telling young men that to be male they must be violent ?Feminism is for males and females.
subdue the violent/hateful nature of males. Love your mother, take lessons from her, because no matter what she's always happier for the most part. peace sisters, and brothers
Millions men is slaves, in various compulsory armies while women of their countries are free and have fun lives. Feminist propagation bears destructive antihuman character.
Hey don't feel sorry for your gender dude, men cause their own demise, get with it. I realize males in general only use one side of their brain, for most of the times, but the point is the male does all the harm to himself, so he should at least have the intelligence to admit he's mentally ill. Women are beautiful, compassionate, rational, creatures. Men also can be everything a women is, he's just has a higher chance of being a idiot, due to the way his brain works, but Matriarchy will help
You are a dissident and you are a traitor to the human race. War is what you seek not peace and hate is what you breed. You are a misandrist and a female supremacist. Do you really think women like you should change places with men?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
There HAVE been Matriarchal societies in the past even though a lot of men and some women (feminists trying to say that "control structures" are exclusively male) deny it.
These societies have been association with ill-treatment of men, Goddess-worship, widespread physical castration and minimization of men's role in society.
You woman, fokersbokers, need to dispense with the lies and presences.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"women cannot be hypocrites until they have behaved the same way as men in power"
Zero logic. People can be hypocrites at any time there are no exceptional rules about it. Also we live in Matriarchal society as it is and they are behaving brutally against men; albeit in an underculture and in the context of the law.
"THEY HAVENT BEEN GIVEN A CHANCE YET"
Yes they have. First of all there has been a steady growth in Matriarchy since the 1960s when they unleashed sexual anarchism proper.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I slightly misinterpreted what fokersbokers said, I thought he was pointing out the hypocrisy of feminists in their claims of equality but enforcement of Matriarchy. In any event, my comments stand as if that's what he did say.
so in short you say you want equality and yet you openly attack a male who dares to endorce matriarchy. You say you want equal choices and freedoms for people yet it seems one cannot have opinion different to yours without being called something they are not
you say men should be heard yet you jump all over my friend as soon as he opens his mouth.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"so in short you say you want equality and yet you openly attack a male who dares to endorce matriarchy."
You're only figuring this out now? They were fooling you all this time. All feminism is for the Establishment of Matriarchal society.
Every feminist woman is in favour of a Matriarchal society in which men have subjugate position. They don't say it exoterically but it is the case. Now of course, they are beginning to express it exoterically but they are only expressing what all ...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What all feminists feel in private.
Indeed "the Movement to Establish Matriarchy" should be the Collins dictionary definition of feminism as it is 100% consistently accurate. Not "equality for men and women" which is nothing but false marketing.
Now is the time to stop say "waaah you're not playing by the rules?!?!" and TAKE UP THE ARMS AGAINST FEMINISM/MATRIARCHY! In a figurative sense.
people who support matriarchy believe women would be better off in power, women cannot be hypocrites until they have behaved the same way as men in power
THEY HAVENT BEEN GIVEN A CHANCE YET
They cant become hypocrites until they have messed it up like men.
Nowhere does this gent state he is a feminist. Why do you spit that word? Is there something wrong with being a feminist.? Do you spit the word feminist at anyone who is pro female power?
As you make the assumption that my friend is a feminist, should i assume you are a gay male or a straight male hard done by a woman because you have pro male views?
DONT BE STUPID
you add nothing constructive here only your own bitter view
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hypocrites! Fems have complained constantly as long as anyone can remember, claiming that there is a patriarchy and crying bitter tears about it. But they want to do the very thing that they accuse men of. Assholes!
Well said 501 and to those men on here belittling this short video and feeling provoked inwardly to the point of religiously thumbs downing agreement with matriarchy, your actions speak way louder than your words ever could, your defensivness in itself is testament to the fact that men are agressive and do not feel secure even discussing the idea of matriarchy. It makes me ashamed, bring on the women :D
Anyway with girls now taking over boys in academia in most subjects(most recentley and notably maths and science) matriarchy i believe will come. Why? Because knowledge is power and i personally will shed a tear of thanks the day that age dawns.
@SecureMale501 girls are encouraged to do well in schools that are adapted to their styles of learning via prodding coursework. they are given gender specific bursaries and are taught by mostly women until university. boys in schools are losing interest because of the lack of role models and encouragement given to them. lets not forget that grades in school do not reflect innovation, as men continue to display to this day despite all the feminist hype.
And to all my brothers here playing down the idea of matriarchy,we have had the ball for thousands of years and done nothing but make a damn mess of it.Women have been supressed for thousands of years and you feel you have to speak out against a 4 minute youtube video promoting female power - way to go guys you make us look really secure - sigh.
and not all women are caring, nuturing and peaceful. But generally (and we must make generalisations on such a huge subject as social change) these are the charateristics which differentiate men and women.Its clear to see that socities led by generally competitive, agressive leaders will run by those means. After 5000 years of male rule, bloodshed and tears, in a world where 36,000 children die a day what is so wrong with questioning the possibilty of change?
I also had to laugh at the citation of Margret Thatcher as an argument against matriarchy. Come now we must put things in context. The reason Margret Thatcher excelled in her field is because she was NOT a typical woman, indeed the men in her party described her as having the biggest balls in the cabinet. She flourished in a patriarchy because she was an exception. This leads to the obvious statement that of course not all men are agressive, competitive and elitest
One most only look to the iconography before 2000BC it is largely based in Goddess worship and has profoundly feminine aspects.Its also prudent to note that at this time the images were mainly peaceful ie of agriculture, the Goddess, the recording of the moon and stars etc. It is without doubt that with the onset of the patriarchy the images change to those of weapons, war and military prowess.Hmmmmm indeed.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"One most only look to the iconography before 2000BC it is largely based in Goddess worship and has profoundly feminine aspects."
Yes it's always important to remember this when discussing feminism etc. That Matriarchy has existed in the past, it is very possible that can rise again and therefore, is something worth fighting against.
This video isn't trying to prove anything,do you read the info panel or does your dumb ass only deal in pictures?It quite clearly states that its a PROMOTIONAL video that means its promoting the idea of female rule and power.Who cares if you like the music or not?what does that add to intelligable discussion?and i loved the comment"matriarchy not a snowballs chance in hell"You do realise that before the onset of the patriarchy and theistic religion its thee most probable way of human societies?
dude thats not showing anything, its just a video with a bunch of pictures, obviously you are utterly retarded. cant you read? look at the info you idiot. ever heard the phrase look before you leap? READ BEFORE YOU COMMENT SO YOU DON'T MAKE A COMPLETE FOOL OF YOURSELF OVER THE INTERNET.
WTF....was that video really trying to prove something? I just didnt see what yall are seeing, i saw a slideshow of random as pictures of cultures, women, and war.?.? and in the background there was some high off opium genre of music playing with what sounded like a indian man summoning the gods through ceremonial flute lyrics. i mean wtf?
oh and as for matriarchy, not a snowballs chance in hell. there will be women leaders but as for them in complete rule? Nah. Can u say revolution?
I'm really astounded by the numbers of what appears to be women speaking out AGAINST matriarchy here (in the comments) -- it's kind of scary. Like shooting yourself in your own leg. Get smart women, and grow up. It's not a woman's world.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
bullshit. that's catering too much to stupid males and dickwhipped women. it's like 'dumbing down' schools when kids aren't learning, so everyone passes. ridiculous. the WRM lost steam, and was never fully embraced by enough women with 'nads enough to push forward. we got all cute again, and fucking PC, and it went out the window. it will take a radical and militant action to go from patriarchy to Matriarchy. gotta fight fire with fire... Matriarchy, it's just a matter of time!
When people hear "radical",they think "militant" when in reality,radical means "root".Feminism aims to get to the root cause of oppression,and end the system that allows it.
We feminists are lied about so often, that unless one studies the history of the movement,the lies seem true.I'm starting to think we need to come up with some new words for our movement,just because most people don't understand the original meanings of the ones we use.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Radical feminism is militant feminism. It is militantly against men and men's freedom in various senses.
Not only that but all feminism is radical feminism. It is unfair to create the category "radical feminism" when really, what we call "radical feminism" should be "standard feminism", as radfem's ideas are mainstream and normal within feminist thought and practice.
Feminism is monolithically "radical" (i.e. anti-male) and Matriarchal.
Radical feminism and mainstream feminism share many core values and the most important one. The radical one. Radical doesn't mean militant. Go get a dictionary, please.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"Matriarchies are egalitarian, with all power being equally split between the sexes"
This is the LIE feminists spin every time when confronted on the Matriarchy question.
Some women/feminists would actually disown the term Matriarchy but you don't, illogically you continue to use it even when in linguistical terms it doesn't make sense.
The big deal is that it is wrong to assume that a world run by women is inherently better. Im not against female leadership we need more of it but it will not save the world. Compassionate leadership that is capable will save it. What i meant by all genders is that there are different forms of gender expression so i try not to refer to the "two" genders.
Krissy4nik, a matriarch is not the opposite of patriarchy. Matriarchies are egalitarian, with all power being equally split between the sexes. If you read the work of the second waver leaders, you will see how they spoke of how important it is that women only seek equality, and not superiority. Misconceptions about feminism stems from words like "matriarchy" and "radical" being ascribed meanings that are far, far, from the original definitions. I'll elaborate in another post.
Matriarchy IS the opposite of patriarchy, that is fact. If we live in a world of equality, how is that a matriarchy? That is an egalitariean society, not a matriarchy.
As a feminist I must say your premise is bullshit. A matriarchy will not change the world. The idea that women somehow posess a gentleness that would make it all better is shit. Women can be just as brutal and violent as men look at mary queen of scots look at margret fucking thatcher. I hope you don't have a son because the lesson he would learn is that he is inherently a violent brutal person. Feminism is about respect,equality, and a solution that includes all genders and gender expressions.
One thing that I will not tolerate on this page is vulgarity. You need to either reframe your comments and express yourself civilly or do not post on this page at all. Secondly, you lack knowldege about matriarchal/matrilineal societies. The examples you cite about Mary Queen of Scots and Margaret Thatcher come from imperialist PATRIARCHAL SOCIETIES. You don't sound like a feminist to me, you sound like a very hostile male, or a female who was internalized alot of male oppression and dogma.
Vulgarity? There is nothing vulgar about it it is simple language. I have not "internalized male oppression and dogma" either. The bottom line is possesion of a ovaries does not make of more or less virtue than anyone else so it is simply a lie to present the world under a matriarchy as a better place. The only solution is to come together i dont want the patriarchy but matriarchy is just more oppression w/ a differnce genetalia.
Again, your comments are borne out of a lack of knowledge and are offensive to the multitude of matriarchal societies that exist across the world, do not engage in negative stereotyping based on ignorance, fear and oppressive dogma!
Krissy4nik,matriarchy is not the opposite of patriarchy.Matriarchal societies are egalitarian,not one sex ruling over the other.Both sexes are truly equal,and that is what brings about their peace.Many Native American tribes were matriarchal, and they thought that the white settlers were weird for refusing to talk to the native women when it came to business or other matters.Sweden too can now be called a matriarchy since half their leaders are female.
The Swedes, due to matriarchy, have even virtually conquered prostitution. The whole subject of matriarchy is really fascinating, and you can pm me if you'd like for some suggested reading. I hope you don't think I'm trying to correct you, because I'm not. I just hate seeing women bicker, especially when they are working for the same goals. I think you and Matriquest's just had a misunderstanding. Take care.
One successful matriarchy does not mean matriarchy is right. There have also been patriarchal governments that did well. I dont believe a government run by women would inherently be better seeing as women have the same potential for cruelty as men do.
We already do live in a matriarchy. We never lived under complete male rule. Just because men are doing all the work does not mean they were not providing for and doing the bidding of women. Women are the largest voting block and decide politics. Look at all the entitlements women have, ALL the rights in divorce, all control and rights in reproduction and conception. Affirmative Action, Title IX, The Council of Women and Girls. 7 Federal Offices on their health and not 1 for men..ect ect
Women simply have alloted themselves more choices, rights, laws and privileges than men have.
Women hold 54% of the vote. They do not run for political office at ANY level of government as much as men AND WOMEN consistently vote for men to be their public servants of office. Why, because men will provide and protect women. Women already do control everything, what more do you want. Men are subjugated and the second sex in all aspects. You want to assert more tyranny!!
I know it's not just women running away with society it's the damn invalids with their parking and anti discrimination laws, the blacks with their naacp and hate crime laws and dont get me started on those natives and gays..these groups are under respresented in the power structure thats why these "special interests exsist" the only arena men get screwed in is child care & thats due idea that females are meant to be home w.the kids.
To krissy4nik women like you are the reason why it's taking forever for women to gain the power they need! You value the male opinion too much. Don't you realize by now that men in general don't care what us women think? Why should we care, what they think? If men cared at all we wouldn't be in this mess. I will always respect a guy with class, but come on stop caring what they think! Demand respect, and change! It's funny men seem to not care, and women seem to care too much, crap
The reason feminism cannot advance is because we are stuck in these mistaken ideas that women are inherently superior to men that is not feminism it is sexism. No cause will advance ignoring 50% of the population. We can speak up for ourselves reguardless of what men think and that great but the better way to move forward is to get them to listen. They are as much part of the solution as the problem.
You say: "it's taking forever for women to gain the power they need! You value the male opinion too much." You feminists want class conflict, you want war with men! Civilizations are both built and destroyed on the backs of men, the blood, sweat and tears of men, our toil.
Be careful what you wish for and who provides for your "independence". You will sicken the hand that feeds you and kill the goose that lays the golden egg. You will kill the reciprocal flow of energy between the sexes.
consequence, a more pacifist and longer-lasting society! I militate for a democratic communist system which would, if not cancel, at least delay the destruction of our civilization by centuries or millenniums, (we can't predict when an asteroid might hit us, so...) and at a political level, I support a secular,anti-sexist and anti-racist society,so I don't give a damn about patriarchy and matriarchy unless they are supported by too many people and become dangerous!I'm a communist,not a feminist!
Vict0r1984 4 months ago
world's oil in the 2050s or even the destruction of life on Earth in less than 100 years if it keeps the present rate of deforestation! We need a conscious economic system which would preserve nature and increase agricultural production by modernizing already existent farms or by developing urban alimentary industries, and one which would plan the economical activity so that we could make the transition to infinite energy resources, (like solar, eolian and geothermal electricity) and, in
Vict0r1984 4 months ago
moral society which assures the survival of the human race and its prosperity, like, for example, challenging the economical system. Capitalism is powered by the greedy and selfish profit motive, and it does not act in a rational way of preserving humanity, but actually in a very wasteful way of profit-gaining (thus extracting resources to their extinction and cutting forests everywhere for agricultural and urban expansion), and it will inevitably generate huge financial crises by finishing the
Vict0r1984 4 months ago
privileged races and oppressed races, that system would have a privileged sex and an oppressed sex. Such models of government were represented in the past by patriarchies, but they would be just as bad in a matriarchal form, so we must seek to maintain a system which provides the purest possible form of gender equality. Everything out of this boundaries is sexist and immoral, but matriarchy is not a serious problem in our society for now, so we should have other priorities if we want to create a
Vict0r1984 4 months ago
the average women a 100 IQ, but yet, there are very much women who have a better IQ score than 102, and some even get over 180...), and if you make the same test after a few generations or in a different location you might just get the opposite result, so NO SOCIETY SHOULD BE BUILT ON GENDER INEQUALITY PRINCIPLES, and if it is, there is no doubt that it would be very immoral and oppressive! Such a society would be just as immoral as a fascist state, with the only difference that instead of
Vict0r1984 4 months ago
Tesla were intelligent), and the fact that women waged almost no wars doesn't mean that they are more pacifist or a better gender (it just means women ruled countries very few times in history...).
Even if a gender is indeed, on the average, more intelligent, more empathic, more peaceful or has a better memory than the other, the difference would be very small, in real life there would be very much exceptions from the theoretical case (for example, the average men is taught to have a 102 IQ and
Vict0r1984 4 months ago
"who's the better gender?" game, and all I am criticizing is capitalism! The feminists used to do it too back in the days when their movement wasn't a sexist joke, so you can criticize them as much as you want. I'm not against it! Every single individual on this planet is different, and the fact that men invented most of the electronic and industrial devices we use doesn't mean that they are actually more intelligent or a better gender (it just means that some men, like Einstein, Kant, Marx or
Vict0r1984 4 months ago
@gamenode: Did I mention the world "patriarchy"? Did I? You must be either mentally retarded or blind to see my comment as a pro-matriarchy statement. (or maybe sleepy) That was an ironic comment addressed to feminists because their movement once started as an egalitarian socialist one, and now they are concerned with stupid sexist right-wing principles like "matriarchies". Your arguments do not harm my theory at all, because I'm an egalitarian and I don't care about your childish
Vict0r1984 4 months ago
Despite the feminist propaganda to the contrary a 2007 CDC report shows that women commit the majority of domestic violence. Unilateral violence which is most depicted in DV PSA's is committed by women 70% of the time.
Women also abuse children at twice the rate as men and murder more children than men.
In men's area of influence (resource gathering) men commit more violence and crime. In women's area of influence (family/relations) women commit the majority of crime but aren't accountable.
gamenode 4 months ago
The feminists claim that women were property and had no rights etc.
In fact, women had superior rights to males. Married women could not be charged with a crime or sued. Her husband would be charged for all her crimes including murder and treason. He was also responsible for all her debts and could be imprisoned for life if he couldn't pay them. No matter what she did he had to support her for life even after divorce.
In this arrangement tell me honestly who is the property?
gamenode 4 months ago
Recently Catherine Kieu poisoned her husband. While unconscious she tied him to a bed then woke him up so she could cut off his penis. Then she threw the penis in the garbage disposal. When the women of "The Talk" discussed this on CBS they cheered this act of sexual and domestic violence. Millions of women agreed.
When have men ever cheered the mutilation of a woman for no good reason? Women are not superior to men and more power for women will mean more violence for men.
gamenode 4 months ago
The U.S. is already a matriarchal society. Women are a majority vote and elect those politicians, male and female who they think will serve their interests best.
The result? 7 million men in prison. Women avoid legal accountability for crimes including murder. Men are denied equal reproductive rights, parental rights, property rights. The nation buckles under the weight of entitlements and has marginalized its best workers with affirmative action and preferential treatment for women.
gamenode 4 months ago
The argument that Margaret Thatcher was a product of the "Patriarchy" is WEAK.That same "Patriarchy" produced William Wilberforce who was responsible for the abolition of the slave trade and the institution of slavery.It produced Abraham Lincoln,who would have given women the vote if events of greater urgency hadn't arisen,and Aneurin Bevan who established the NHS.Women who would have died in childbirth in 1900 were surviving it in 1950 and on average outliving men because of the "Patriarchy".
disagreeablesob 7 months ago
Hotep.I, the General supports this message!!! I am feeling this video.If you check out my page you will see that I have fought for this higher worldview.I have in my own community showed and proved that the woman was created as a higher being from the great mama.We must put mama back on her thrown!!!!!!!!!!!!
NaturalTahuti 11 months ago
its all clear now, when i look at a woman, i should put on my rosey hued glasses.
BRYONMU 1 year ago
entrepreneurs) destroy our environment, exploit every last drop of oil on this planet and cut down half of the forests of the Earth in less than a century for developing agricultural industries. (all this accelerated destruction of the environment started in the 50s, so it is actually a lifetime in which we destroyed the Earth more than in 6000 years of history) How I already said: nice! Keep the good job, feminist movement! You will soon rule a wasteland called Earth!
Vict0r1984 1 year ago
@Vict0r1984
Evil patriarchy destroyed the land? And yet it is women who control 85% of domestic spending. Women created the consumer demand that mowed down the forests and created ecological destruction. And what would they care so long as they got their plastic shoes, pencil skirts, and accessories. Who does the most animal testing? Why it's the consumer cosmetic industry driving by female consumers.
3 times as much retail space is given to female merchandise than male. Who has the power?
gamenode 4 months ago
big industrial corporations, and the liberals of the world are concerned with ideas like matriarchy or patriarchy (which doesn't exist anymore)...
Nice! I'm interested in how women will rule a world with no resources, world-wide starvation because of too much population, and much bigger oceans which would rise over New York or Tokyo...This social discriminatory ideas are keeping the liberals busy with fictional conspirative theories while the rich (no matter if they are men or women
Vict0r1984 1 year ago
Any ideology which clearly states the control of one gender/race/nation/religion over the other ones is dictatorial and will never work. The job of the government is the political and economical situation of the nation, not the social life, since any government which has established social restrictions or favoured some groups of individuals turned out to be dictatorial. The ice caps of the world are melting because of the hungry for power capitalist system and the pollution generated by the
Vict0r1984 1 year ago
I hate patriarchy with a passion. It is the evil I know. I'm not particularly keen on the idea of matriarchy though. I really don't want a class ruling me. I support something more like llibertarian democracy, where it is irrelevant which gender the leaders are and the leaders don't have much power but they keep the group together and cooperating.
CamillaCalamity 1 year ago
welcome to the new tyranny. same as the old tyranny. the hypocrisy is clear: to hate patriarchy yet promote matriarchy is like saying that true equality for african americans would be to allow them to enslave whites for a few millenia. your cause is nothing less than the assurance that the pendulum will continue to swing between this or that inequity for the entirity of human history.
knowthingman 1 year ago
@knowthingman wow, right on the money
jave042 1 year ago
@knowthingman That's true, exactly true. It's as sick as 2+2=5. It bears note, however, that men naturally are inclined to lead and women are naturally inclined to follow. That is how we were made. All women want to be protected and loved, and all men want to be independent and take care of a woman. Anything else is a futile attempt to deviate from biology.
Lachdenan 1 year ago
@Lachdenan
i think this is why a small group of men are, and have been, behind the feminist movement from the beginning. they see the potential benefit from societies fractured along sex and race lines. i wonder what women would think if they knew their own movement was directed mainly by a small group of powerful and rich men, largely for the purpose of maintaining their own power and profit?
knowthingman 1 year ago
@knowthingman Yes. The Rockefellers funded this evil from the very beginning to force women to be taxed.
Lachdenan 1 year ago
I recently found a video in which a top sociologist in Harvard University says that Matriarchy is the only way to cure the current ills of society.
Here it is:
/watch?v=-Sd-j0rKeKw
happygregory1989 1 year ago
Women have always been valued throughout history. I guess some idiot based one man's failure to lead a household on all men and now we have feminism.
revemupman 1 year ago
The word is out about the plastic degrading into xenoestrogens in the water, which androgynizes men and women, while giving them cancer. Every law of physics and chemistry and everything else are linked, and the androgyny is cancer. It is death, and that is what is being advocated by feminism. When you push too far, you will be shut down by men, and you won't control the world. I can guarantee you that. If we get really lucky, perhaps the women will cast you out as well: I hope.
Lachdenan 1 year ago
The breakdown of modern western society exists as a direct result of a breakdown in gender roles, which entails the breakdown of the family. Men usually lead. Women usually follow. Feminism has not presented equality. It's given us the Duluth model, child support tyranny, and divorces that encourage women to use their children as bargaining tools--and it's her right to kill them, too, isn't it? This is tax-funded, and women have shut up and walked right in, just like you were supposed to.
Lachdenan 1 year ago
Sometimes intentionally, often by habit, men have worked to keep Us separated. There are entire sections of the planet where nations treat Woman like cattle. Men who dont see this are living in a bubble. Patriarchies are not necessarily evil, but they are distortions of nature, and lead to evil outcomes so easily. Once all nations...all humanity...comes together and recognizes that treatment of Woman must be elevated to a very very high level...we will have Matriarchy.
bootgoddesgina 1 year ago
The Universe runs on Balance, and that includes female and male energy, but the way that energy works together can be very different. I am not a Female Supremacist (though I get mistaken for one sometimes) but I do believe men have their part to play by working together and cooperating (as opposed to fighting and trying to control/separate Us). Cooperation leads to peace. A unifying peace can come about if men learn to unite in one great way: loving Us.
bootgoddesgina 1 year ago
Much depth of right and wrong in these comments. Matriarchy is a broad term, as Feminism has become. New terms will come along. Societies change...evolution continues....Woman has the skill, talent and heart (and Destiny) to lead this world and its odd how some men are incapable of visualizing this. Reads like defensiveness and arrogance. Men have done much to evolve the world this far.....in wonderful ways....but like children grow up, so must humanity. The future demands greater Sisterhood.
bootgoddesgina 1 year ago
I'm for gender equity. I don't see how matriarchal rule by women has any more to do with equity than patriarchy. If you advocate rule by women without any pretenses at equality between the sexes then at least you're consistent.
prschuster 1 year ago
So much beauty brings tears to my eyes when unbalanced by the maleimages of war and violence.
MichaelManners101 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MichaelManners101 You say: " So much beauty brings tears to my eyes when unbalanced by the maleimages of war and violence." Yes, oh so horrid those males are, fighting for territory and resources to give to females..What horrid disgusting creatures men are.....
YOU MICHEAL are the most self loathing worm of a man I've ever met.. Go ahead, stop competing with other males and see how far it gets you... Male male competition is brutal and an ultimately constructive element of our nature.
Red0660 1 year ago
Beautiful video. Of course, women are beautiful. I just wish it said something about a matriarchy.
WildNice 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The term "politically correct" originated in the Russian Communist Party in the 1920's. It usage in America today illustrates the extent society has been subverted. Feminist activists are mostly Communist dupes. The Communist goal is to destroy Western Civilization, which is dedicated to genuine diversity (pluralism), individual liberty and equal opportunity (but not equal outcomes).
halcyon180 2 years ago
What about the fact that women are racist, homophobic and generally intolerant? This is a function of their sexual conservatism and elitism. Obviously, racism is an ideological expression of sexual conservatism. Men are less racist because of their sexual profligacy.
Also, note how this video only focuses on MIDDLE CLASS, educated women, not the illiterate, intolerant commonweal - the oldest feminist trick in the book.
RookhKshatriya 2 years ago
Men and women both share the same exact emotions and urges. To suggest otherwise isnt keeping with sound reasoning.
That said, we all are capable of the same things and that has been proven by time. Fighting each other over who is more evil or good is a total waste of time.
It doesnt offend me that somebody thinks the world would be better if women ran it. I know that that is supremely ignorant.
blastingcaps 2 years ago
You all talk of this matriarchy of yours, but you have no clue how long men have had to live without our leadership. Hell Babylon, was a matriarchy, and that was literally half of human history, by itself, let alone the Celts, or the Empresses and Queens. Every last one of you is controlling and power hungry, and it shows! It is no coincidence that more than half of human history has been run by you, and yet you still blame us for the frailties of your lives. Make no mistake, you sicken us.
mattcg90 2 years ago
So you are saying that babylon was a matriarchy? I guess youve just admitted that women aim to violently kill of massive amounts of people and dominate. Hmm i guess you did study up on babylon trying to kill of all the Jews and ending taking them all as slaves. I guess you women have lied again about women being "non-violent".
halcyon180 2 years ago
In the second part of this series we will get to see what non-traditional women look like (every remotely Westernized woman on the planet) and what kind of activities they typically engage in.
regresseur 2 years ago
there is so many do and dont
that i could not muster up a propper opinion of this
masterbeef00 2 years ago
Not a single argument in these texts. Demagogue and propagandist, bravo!
sosadreg 2 years ago
Their should be more of these videos, this is what the world needs. if you want to overcome a world dominated by violence/hatred, then you must make sure there's either a equal amount of females in all positions of power, or more. It's that simple.
grinnaturemusic90 2 years ago
Women have the tendency to be just as violent as men and just as hateful as well. We do need more female leadership but more importantly we need more non violent leadership i dont care what genetalia they have. The idea that women are kinder gentler and better is the same excuse they used to say we should only raise children. If we make kindness & gentleness female traits are we not telling young men that to be male they must be violent ?Feminism is for males and females.
krissy4nik 2 years ago
subdue the violent/hateful nature of males. Love your mother, take lessons from her, because no matter what she's always happier for the most part. peace sisters, and brothers
grinnaturemusic90 2 years ago
women are violent and hateful too.
Do a search on "chicks fighting"
You'll see something vicious.
blastingcaps 2 years ago
Millions men is slaves, in various compulsory armies while women of their countries are free and have fun lives. Feminist propagation bears destructive antihuman character.
sosadreg 3 years ago
Hey don't feel sorry for your gender dude, men cause their own demise, get with it. I realize males in general only use one side of their brain, for most of the times, but the point is the male does all the harm to himself, so he should at least have the intelligence to admit he's mentally ill. Women are beautiful, compassionate, rational, creatures. Men also can be everything a women is, he's just has a higher chance of being a idiot, due to the way his brain works, but Matriarchy will help
grinnaturemusic90 2 years ago
You are a dissident and you are a traitor to the human race. War is what you seek not peace and hate is what you breed. You are a misandrist and a female supremacist. Do you really think women like you should change places with men?
Red0660 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There HAVE been Matriarchal societies in the past even though a lot of men and some women (feminists trying to say that "control structures" are exclusively male) deny it.
These societies have been association with ill-treatment of men, Goddess-worship, widespread physical castration and minimization of men's role in society.
You woman, fokersbokers, need to dispense with the lies and presences.
floydianworld 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"women cannot be hypocrites until they have behaved the same way as men in power"
Zero logic. People can be hypocrites at any time there are no exceptional rules about it. Also we live in Matriarchal society as it is and they are behaving brutally against men; albeit in an underculture and in the context of the law.
"THEY HAVENT BEEN GIVEN A CHANCE YET"
Yes they have. First of all there has been a steady growth in Matriarchy since the 1960s when they unleashed sexual anarchism proper.
floydianworld 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I slightly misinterpreted what fokersbokers said, I thought he was pointing out the hypocrisy of feminists in their claims of equality but enforcement of Matriarchy. In any event, my comments stand as if that's what he did say.
floydianworld 3 years ago
so in short you say you want equality and yet you openly attack a male who dares to endorce matriarchy. You say you want equal choices and freedoms for people yet it seems one cannot have opinion different to yours without being called something they are not
you say men should be heard yet you jump all over my friend as soon as he opens his mouth.
dude he doesnt need to say your insecure
YOU SAY IT ALL YOURSELF
fokersbokers 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"so in short you say you want equality and yet you openly attack a male who dares to endorce matriarchy."
You're only figuring this out now? They were fooling you all this time. All feminism is for the Establishment of Matriarchal society.
Every feminist woman is in favour of a Matriarchal society in which men have subjugate position. They don't say it exoterically but it is the case. Now of course, they are beginning to express it exoterically but they are only expressing what all ...
floydianworld 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What all feminists feel in private.
Indeed "the Movement to Establish Matriarchy" should be the Collins dictionary definition of feminism as it is 100% consistently accurate. Not "equality for men and women" which is nothing but false marketing.
Now is the time to stop say "waaah you're not playing by the rules?!?!" and TAKE UP THE ARMS AGAINST FEMINISM/MATRIARCHY! In a figurative sense.
floydianworld 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
** Now is NOT the time to stop say "waaah you're not... *
floydianworld 3 years ago
people who support matriarchy believe women would be better off in power, women cannot be hypocrites until they have behaved the same way as men in power
THEY HAVENT BEEN GIVEN A CHANCE YET
They cant become hypocrites until they have messed it up like men.
fokersbokers 3 years ago 4
Nowhere does this gent state he is a feminist. Why do you spit that word? Is there something wrong with being a feminist.? Do you spit the word feminist at anyone who is pro female power?
As you make the assumption that my friend is a feminist, should i assume you are a gay male or a straight male hard done by a woman because you have pro male views?
DONT BE STUPID
you add nothing constructive here only your own bitter view
and why is it hypocritical to want matriarchy?
fokersbokers 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hypocrites! Fems have complained constantly as long as anyone can remember, claiming that there is a patriarchy and crying bitter tears about it. But they want to do the very thing that they accuse men of. Assholes!
proudguy 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
All feminists have ever wanted to do is Establish Matriarchy under the guise of "equality for men" "resolving male domination" and "human dignity".
To be honest any man who could not see through that charade was a bit of an idiot in the first place anyway.
Also, why are you so marked down? Is it 90% Feminists/Pro-Matriarchy Women viewing this page or what?
floydianworld 3 years ago
Well said 501 and to those men on here belittling this short video and feeling provoked inwardly to the point of religiously thumbs downing agreement with matriarchy, your actions speak way louder than your words ever could, your defensivness in itself is testament to the fact that men are agressive and do not feel secure even discussing the idea of matriarchy. It makes me ashamed, bring on the women :D
Brainrapper78 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'll discuss it, you fucking cunt!
floydianworld 3 years ago
Anyway with girls now taking over boys in academia in most subjects(most recentley and notably maths and science) matriarchy i believe will come. Why? Because knowledge is power and i personally will shed a tear of thanks the day that age dawns.
SecureMale501 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You are a typical feminist woman.
proudguy 3 years ago
@SecureMale501 girls are encouraged to do well in schools that are adapted to their styles of learning via prodding coursework. they are given gender specific bursaries and are taught by mostly women until university. boys in schools are losing interest because of the lack of role models and encouragement given to them. lets not forget that grades in school do not reflect innovation, as men continue to display to this day despite all the feminist hype.
BRYONMU 1 year ago
And to all my brothers here playing down the idea of matriarchy,we have had the ball for thousands of years and done nothing but make a damn mess of it.Women have been supressed for thousands of years and you feel you have to speak out against a 4 minute youtube video promoting female power - way to go guys you make us look really secure - sigh.
SecureMale501 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"SecureMale501" you are nothing but an emasculated eunuch wimp.
floydianworld 3 years ago
and not all women are caring, nuturing and peaceful. But generally (and we must make generalisations on such a huge subject as social change) these are the charateristics which differentiate men and women.Its clear to see that socities led by generally competitive, agressive leaders will run by those means. After 5000 years of male rule, bloodshed and tears, in a world where 36,000 children die a day what is so wrong with questioning the possibilty of change?
SecureMale501 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Matriarchy will eat your balls for breakfast.
floydianworld 3 years ago
I also had to laugh at the citation of Margret Thatcher as an argument against matriarchy. Come now we must put things in context. The reason Margret Thatcher excelled in her field is because she was NOT a typical woman, indeed the men in her party described her as having the biggest balls in the cabinet. She flourished in a patriarchy because she was an exception. This leads to the obvious statement that of course not all men are agressive, competitive and elitest
SecureMale501 3 years ago 12
One most only look to the iconography before 2000BC it is largely based in Goddess worship and has profoundly feminine aspects.Its also prudent to note that at this time the images were mainly peaceful ie of agriculture, the Goddess, the recording of the moon and stars etc. It is without doubt that with the onset of the patriarchy the images change to those of weapons, war and military prowess.Hmmmmm indeed.
SecureMale501 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"One most only look to the iconography before 2000BC it is largely based in Goddess worship and has profoundly feminine aspects."
Yes it's always important to remember this when discussing feminism etc. That Matriarchy has existed in the past, it is very possible that can rise again and therefore, is something worth fighting against.
floydianworld 3 years ago
This video isn't trying to prove anything,do you read the info panel or does your dumb ass only deal in pictures?It quite clearly states that its a PROMOTIONAL video that means its promoting the idea of female rule and power.Who cares if you like the music or not?what does that add to intelligable discussion?and i loved the comment"matriarchy not a snowballs chance in hell"You do realise that before the onset of the patriarchy and theistic religion its thee most probable way of human societies?
SecureMale501 3 years ago 4
dude thats not showing anything, its just a video with a bunch of pictures, obviously you are utterly retarded. cant you read? look at the info you idiot. ever heard the phrase look before you leap? READ BEFORE YOU COMMENT SO YOU DON'T MAKE A COMPLETE FOOL OF YOURSELF OVER THE INTERNET.
acidfire14 3 years ago
WTF....was that video really trying to prove something? I just didnt see what yall are seeing, i saw a slideshow of random as pictures of cultures, women, and war.?.? and in the background there was some high off opium genre of music playing with what sounded like a indian man summoning the gods through ceremonial flute lyrics. i mean wtf?
oh and as for matriarchy, not a snowballs chance in hell. there will be women leaders but as for them in complete rule? Nah. Can u say revolution?
purpnugz88 3 years ago
Would Matriarchy be better? I think it would. Only way to know is to try it, right?
mycagedbird 3 years ago
Kill it with fire! lol
sosadreg 3 years ago
This is so beautiful it made me cry.
anarchafeminist 3 years ago
I'm really astounded by the numbers of what appears to be women speaking out AGAINST matriarchy here (in the comments) -- it's kind of scary. Like shooting yourself in your own leg. Get smart women, and grow up. It's not a woman's world.
iloveterriers 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Matriarchy would be the human species' worst frame of history... oh sorry, HERstory.
MrUbuntu 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
bullshit. that's catering too much to stupid males and dickwhipped women. it's like 'dumbing down' schools when kids aren't learning, so everyone passes. ridiculous. the WRM lost steam, and was never fully embraced by enough women with 'nads enough to push forward. we got all cute again, and fucking PC, and it went out the window. it will take a radical and militant action to go from patriarchy to Matriarchy. gotta fight fire with fire... Matriarchy, it's just a matter of time!
laceydays 3 years ago
When people hear "radical",they think "militant" when in reality,radical means "root".Feminism aims to get to the root cause of oppression,and end the system that allows it.
We feminists are lied about so often, that unless one studies the history of the movement,the lies seem true.I'm starting to think we need to come up with some new words for our movement,just because most people don't understand the original meanings of the ones we use.
defendtruth 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Radical feminism is militant feminism. It is militantly against men and men's freedom in various senses.
Not only that but all feminism is radical feminism. It is unfair to create the category "radical feminism" when really, what we call "radical feminism" should be "standard feminism", as radfem's ideas are mainstream and normal within feminist thought and practice.
Feminism is monolithically "radical" (i.e. anti-male) and Matriarchal.
floydianworld 3 years ago
Radical feminism and mainstream feminism share many core values and the most important one. The radical one. Radical doesn't mean militant. Go get a dictionary, please.
DianaBoston 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"Matriarchies are egalitarian, with all power being equally split between the sexes"
This is the LIE feminists spin every time when confronted on the Matriarchy question.
Some women/feminists would actually disown the term Matriarchy but you don't, illogically you continue to use it even when in linguistical terms it doesn't make sense.
"women only seek equality, and not superiority"
How can you speak such lies so effortlessly?
floydianworld 3 years ago
krissy4nik according to you then, we can have a man in charge with the same outcome, so why the big deal.
ALL GENDERS ???, it must be really hard to count them all
gersquin065 3 years ago
The big deal is that it is wrong to assume that a world run by women is inherently better. Im not against female leadership we need more of it but it will not save the world. Compassionate leadership that is capable will save it. What i meant by all genders is that there are different forms of gender expression so i try not to refer to the "two" genders.
krissy4nik 3 years ago 3
Krissy4nik, a matriarch is not the opposite of patriarchy. Matriarchies are egalitarian, with all power being equally split between the sexes. If you read the work of the second waver leaders, you will see how they spoke of how important it is that women only seek equality, and not superiority. Misconceptions about feminism stems from words like "matriarchy" and "radical" being ascribed meanings that are far, far, from the original definitions. I'll elaborate in another post.
defendtruth 3 years ago 2
Matriarchy IS the opposite of patriarchy, that is fact. If we live in a world of equality, how is that a matriarchy? That is an egalitariean society, not a matriarchy.
masterlegend 3 years ago
As a feminist I must say your premise is bullshit. A matriarchy will not change the world. The idea that women somehow posess a gentleness that would make it all better is shit. Women can be just as brutal and violent as men look at mary queen of scots look at margret fucking thatcher. I hope you don't have a son because the lesson he would learn is that he is inherently a violent brutal person. Feminism is about respect,equality, and a solution that includes all genders and gender expressions.
krissy4nik 3 years ago 2
One thing that I will not tolerate on this page is vulgarity. You need to either reframe your comments and express yourself civilly or do not post on this page at all. Secondly, you lack knowldege about matriarchal/matrilineal societies. The examples you cite about Mary Queen of Scots and Margaret Thatcher come from imperialist PATRIARCHAL SOCIETIES. You don't sound like a feminist to me, you sound like a very hostile male, or a female who was internalized alot of male oppression and dogma.
MatriQuest 3 years ago
Vulgarity? There is nothing vulgar about it it is simple language. I have not "internalized male oppression and dogma" either. The bottom line is possesion of a ovaries does not make of more or less virtue than anyone else so it is simply a lie to present the world under a matriarchy as a better place. The only solution is to come together i dont want the patriarchy but matriarchy is just more oppression w/ a differnce genetalia.
krissy4nik 3 years ago 4
Again, your comments are borne out of a lack of knowledge and are offensive to the multitude of matriarchal societies that exist across the world, do not engage in negative stereotyping based on ignorance, fear and oppressive dogma!
MatriQuest 3 years ago
Krissy4nik,matriarchy is not the opposite of patriarchy.Matriarchal societies are egalitarian,not one sex ruling over the other.Both sexes are truly equal,and that is what brings about their peace.Many Native American tribes were matriarchal, and they thought that the white settlers were weird for refusing to talk to the native women when it came to business or other matters.Sweden too can now be called a matriarchy since half their leaders are female.
to be continued due to space
defendtruth 3 years ago 4
The Swedes, due to matriarchy, have even virtually conquered prostitution. The whole subject of matriarchy is really fascinating, and you can pm me if you'd like for some suggested reading. I hope you don't think I'm trying to correct you, because I'm not. I just hate seeing women bicker, especially when they are working for the same goals. I think you and Matriquest's just had a misunderstanding. Take care.
defendtruth 3 years ago 2
One successful matriarchy does not mean matriarchy is right. There have also been patriarchal governments that did well. I dont believe a government run by women would inherently be better seeing as women have the same potential for cruelty as men do.
krissy4nik 3 years ago 4
We already do live in a matriarchy. We never lived under complete male rule. Just because men are doing all the work does not mean they were not providing for and doing the bidding of women. Women are the largest voting block and decide politics. Look at all the entitlements women have, ALL the rights in divorce, all control and rights in reproduction and conception. Affirmative Action, Title IX, The Council of Women and Girls. 7 Federal Offices on their health and not 1 for men..ect ect
Red0660 2 years ago
Women simply have alloted themselves more choices, rights, laws and privileges than men have.
Women hold 54% of the vote. They do not run for political office at ANY level of government as much as men AND WOMEN consistently vote for men to be their public servants of office. Why, because men will provide and protect women. Women already do control everything, what more do you want. Men are subjugated and the second sex in all aspects. You want to assert more tyranny!!
Red0660 2 years ago
I know it's not just women running away with society it's the damn invalids with their parking and anti discrimination laws, the blacks with their naacp and hate crime laws and dont get me started on those natives and gays..these groups are under respresented in the power structure thats why these "special interests exsist" the only arena men get screwed in is child care & thats due idea that females are meant to be home w.the kids.
krissy4nik 2 years ago
Red0660... Ummm, you obvioulsy have NO CLUE what a Matriarchy is.
ShessaWitch 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ShessaWitch: You say: "Red0660... Ummm, you obvioulsy have NO CLUE what a Matriarchy is."
Ok and what does Matriarchy mean, please enlighten me.
What are the end results of which you seek by implementing such a sexist system of government in both the private and public sphere?
Do you believe that women are morally and judiciously superior to men?
Red0660 1 year ago
To krissy4nik women like you are the reason why it's taking forever for women to gain the power they need! You value the male opinion too much. Don't you realize by now that men in general don't care what us women think? Why should we care, what they think? If men cared at all we wouldn't be in this mess. I will always respect a guy with class, but come on stop caring what they think! Demand respect, and change! It's funny men seem to not care, and women seem to care too much, crap
grinnaturemusic90 2 years ago
The reason feminism cannot advance is because we are stuck in these mistaken ideas that women are inherently superior to men that is not feminism it is sexism. No cause will advance ignoring 50% of the population. We can speak up for ourselves reguardless of what men think and that great but the better way to move forward is to get them to listen. They are as much part of the solution as the problem.
krissy4nik 2 years ago
You say: "it's taking forever for women to gain the power they need! You value the male opinion too much." You feminists want class conflict, you want war with men! Civilizations are both built and destroyed on the backs of men, the blood, sweat and tears of men, our toil.
Be careful what you wish for and who provides for your "independence". You will sicken the hand that feeds you and kill the goose that lays the golden egg. You will kill the reciprocal flow of energy between the sexes.
Red0660 2 years ago
I loved the images...
mrscheshire 3 years ago 2
Great pictures and music. <3
Elentaurel 3 years ago 2
wtf?
controversytruth 4 years ago
...
JamesBond77 4 years ago