It's also the safest because you don't have someone who's drunk behind the control stick. And pilots (even private pilots) are trained to a significantly higher degree than 99% of vehicle drivers. The average pilot is a professional. The average car driver is an amateur by comparison.
Frankly, a car seems much safer to me. An airplane crash is much less likely, but in the rare case that it DOES crash, you're a lot less likely to survive it than if you were in a car.
maybe if we can keep the inside of becoming hot and buring and only the outside burning it will increase the chance of survival. what about wrapping every passenger in a special heatproof blanket that can withstand any tempreture
This test was technically a failure .The jet fuel has a new additive that was suppose to suppress "misting" or the jet fuel ...or its ability to ignite uncontrollably. Plus they were trying the measure the strain experienced on the passenger seats. The remote control pilot has a problem at the last second and the plane landed 200+ feet to short, yawed, and the obstacles were supposed to cut the wing...not the engines.....But yes..they did learn some lessons, just not what they were hoping for!
@PET3RRULEZ More people die from car crashes every year than from airplane crashes. I think even if you include all the 9/11 victims, less people died from that and plane crashes in 2001 than car crashes.
Now, if they said "the least fearful" experience, that would be okay for you to dispute.. But it's statistically true that airplanes are safer than cars.
@PET3RRULEZ If you were born on an airliner and did not ever get off, it would be 30yrs untill you experienced you first crash. However, EVERYONE will be involved in an automoblie crash in their life time. Put another way.. Autos kill as many people every year as were killed in the entire Vietnam war. Or if you prefer.l Autos are the most dangerous product sold in the U.S. They kill and injure waaaaay more people than even guns! I'll fly, thank you very much.
@BLO383 A very big joystick. lol, I think they had a test pilot in like a trailor hooked up via radio to the aircraft. I'd like have a 720 cockpit mockup with all the controls and tolerances of the actual aircraft. Or that's just me...
Did he say 'allowed to burn for an hour' what! and that aluminium fuselage didn't melt! not like those thick steel girders in th wtc's, maybe they should have used aluminium.lol
@MindCrazedBanjo Nobody said the steel girders melted. They reached a temperature at which their strength was halved. I love these armchair conspiracy theorists who think they know more than engineers.
Deutsche Bank, which had a building close to the World Trade Center that had been contaminated with dust, hired the RJ Lee Group, a scientific research organization, to prove to its insurance company that the dust contaminating its building was not ordinary building dust, as its insurance company claimed, but had resulted from the destruction of the World Trade Center.
Cont'd Reports issued by the RJ Lee Group in 2003 and 2004 proved that the dust was indeed WTC dust, having its unique chemical signature. Part of this signature, the RJ Lee Group said in its final (2004) report, was “spherical iron . . . particles,” and this meant, it had pointed out in its 2003 report, that iron had “melted during the WTC Event, producing spherical metallic particles.”
Cont'd The RJ Lee reports thereby provided additional evidence that temperatures had been reached that significantly exceeded those that could have been produced by FIRE!
LOL back in your armchair you pussy deplonker, facts are facts, something Duhbunkers don't seem to care about lmaooooo epic fail.
Thats odd. An entire husk is recovered from this crash, and yet, nothing but a few pieces of scrap metal is found at the pentagon and flight 93 crash site. Hm. Well, I'm gonna go ahead and call bullshit on 9/11.
@TheRealPinkMenace Well, genius, let's think about that one for a second. Could there possibly be a difference between skidding down the runway at 180 knots and slamming directly into a reinforced, missile-proof concrete wall at 500 knots? Could there? Naaah...
Well dude, with the experiment of the NASA Boeing 720 disaster, we most think about how to reduce lifes at risk when an emergency it's all about, think about that and tell me how would you face , what they call THE END OF YOUR LIFE, Besides, the Crew Resource Management says a lot of that.
If the so-called Truth movement has such solid evidence that 9/11 was an inside job, then how come you haven't had anybody indicted? Why are you just sitting on it while the criminals roam freely? What are you doing to free KSM, who's obviously an innocent man being held on false charges?
It's bad enough that you started spamming your 9/11 bullshit on a video that's completely unrelated, but you couldn't even stick to that. Now you're just trying to insult me.
You're sitting there basing your entire opinion of the guy based on how he looks, and you're calling US the morons? That's hilarious.
They haven't charged bin Laden criminally for 9/11 because quite frankly it's pointless. They already have evidence connecting him to other terrorist attacks, and they know he's the leader of Al Qaeda. He's also a prime military target. So stacking more criminal charges on his name is kinda pointless.
I looked it up on Wiki - the 720 is a variant of the 707. It was originally called the 707-020 but then they decided to call it the 720 later on for marketing purposes.
They piloted the plane through REMOTE CONTROL. Kind of funny that anybody who suggests that the planes used on 911 could have been remotely hijacked is dimissed as some sort of "kook" because people find the idea that a commercial airliner could be remotely hijacked to be beyond belief.
they could have, but there's the matter of setting up all of the remote control stuff, and the cameras, because you cant fly blind. They probably had a crap-ton of stuff in the cockpit, so they could control everything. would be kinda hard to get all of the necessary stuff onto a plane.
Why go through all the trouble of secretly installing remote control on a plane so that the crew can't discover it, and then crash it with passengers and crew on board? Don't you think any of them would be panicked or do anything in the minutes it takes for the plane to leave it's proper flightpath and head first for NYC then straight for the towers?
Why not do it with an EMPTY plane instead? Or maybe the official story's right?
Wrona by go posadził
piotr17edi 1 month ago 2
Honny im home!!!! O hey what did you do on work today?
ah nothing special just crashed a boeing 720.....
7249xxl 3 months ago
remote controlled the fuck where can i get one!?!?!?
7249xxl 3 months ago
It's also the safest because you don't have someone who's drunk behind the control stick. And pilots (even private pilots) are trained to a significantly higher degree than 99% of vehicle drivers. The average pilot is a professional. The average car driver is an amateur by comparison.
MultiSteveB 4 months ago
Frankly, a car seems much safer to me. An airplane crash is much less likely, but in the rare case that it DOES crash, you're a lot less likely to survive it than if you were in a car.
ACfireandiceDC 4 months ago
@ACfireandiceDC An automobile is the most dangerous product sold in the U.S.!
sonex424 3 months ago
look dead before they even took of !
98367951 5 months ago
maybe if we can keep the inside of becoming hot and buring and only the outside burning it will increase the chance of survival. what about wrapping every passenger in a special heatproof blanket that can withstand any tempreture
210482fmj 7 months ago
What´s de name off da Song @ 1.15???
MCCopehead 8 months ago
This test was technically a failure .The jet fuel has a new additive that was suppose to suppress "misting" or the jet fuel ...or its ability to ignite uncontrollably. Plus they were trying the measure the strain experienced on the passenger seats. The remote control pilot has a problem at the last second and the plane landed 200+ feet to short, yawed, and the obstacles were supposed to cut the wing...not the engines.....But yes..they did learn some lessons, just not what they were hoping for!
equarg 10 months ago
safest
what happen in 911
PET3RRULEZ 10 months ago
@PET3RRULEZ 911 shows, that Arabs are not the safest passengers.
eltfell 8 months ago
@PET3RRULEZ More people die from car crashes every year than from airplane crashes. I think even if you include all the 9/11 victims, less people died from that and plane crashes in 2001 than car crashes.
Now, if they said "the least fearful" experience, that would be okay for you to dispute.. But it's statistically true that airplanes are safer than cars.
scaremengaviation 4 months ago
@scaremengaviation No big boy, it depends on who driving the plane and who is driving th car.
PET3RRULEZ 4 months ago
@PET3RRULEZ You mean flying. :)
Exactly. Generally speaking people flying commercial jets have been trained, extensively. You can't say the same for people behind-the-wheel.
And you CANNOT REFUTE that airplanes crash less, and result in less deaths on a yearly basis, than cars!
scaremengaviation 4 months ago
@PET3RRULEZ And is the "big boy" BS really necessary? Really?
scaremengaviation 4 months ago
@scaremengaviation Lol :P
PET3RRULEZ 4 months ago
@PET3RRULEZ If you were born on an airliner and did not ever get off, it would be 30yrs untill you experienced you first crash. However, EVERYONE will be involved in an automoblie crash in their life time. Put another way.. Autos kill as many people every year as were killed in the entire Vietnam war. Or if you prefer.l Autos are the most dangerous product sold in the U.S. They kill and injure waaaaay more people than even guns! I'll fly, thank you very much.
sonex424 3 months ago
@sonex424 Thats scary
PET3RRULEZ 3 months ago
@PET3RRULEZ Yes it is isn't it!
sonex424 3 months ago
So that's how they flew the planes into the buildings on 9/11
batfly 1 year ago
I Hate this show
they get the videos from youtube
escobar12levi 1 year ago
@escobar12levi THE NASA 720 DISASTER WAS OBTAINED FROM NASA DRYDEN RESERACH CENTER ITSELF
Skybolter 11 months ago
@escobar12levi THE NASA 720 DISASTER WAS OBTAINED FROM NASA DRYDEN RESERACH CENTER ITSELF, IT'S NOW ON HANDS OF DISCOVERY CHANNELL
Skybolter 11 months ago
I Hate this show
escobar12levi 1 year ago
You fucking morons have to ruin the epic video with the 9/11 crap. you just can't STFU for one second can you.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
How was the boeing controlled for the crash test via remote control?
BLO383 1 year ago
@BLO383 A very big joystick. lol, I think they had a test pilot in like a trailor hooked up via radio to the aircraft. I'd like have a 720 cockpit mockup with all the controls and tolerances of the actual aircraft. Or that's just me...
phillyslasher 1 year ago
Did he say 'allowed to burn for an hour' what! and that aluminium fuselage didn't melt! not like those thick steel girders in th wtc's, maybe they should have used aluminium.lol
MindCrazedBanjo 1 year ago
@MindCrazedBanjo That's Boeing aircraft for ya. they KNOW how to build airplanes, which is why I'm a very loyal fan of Boeing.
RJfan 1 year ago
We are 2 Buddy, i also love BOEING, Specially the 747
Skybolter 1 year ago
@MindCrazedBanjo Nobody said the steel girders melted. They reached a temperature at which their strength was halved. I love these armchair conspiracy theorists who think they know more than engineers.
Devast8ion 1 year ago
@Masturbast8ion Have you just landed or summin?
Deutsche Bank, which had a building close to the World Trade Center that had been contaminated with dust, hired the RJ Lee Group, a scientific research organization, to prove to its insurance company that the dust contaminating its building was not ordinary building dust, as its insurance company claimed, but had resulted from the destruction of the World Trade Center.
MindCrazedBanjo 1 year ago
Cont'd Reports issued by the RJ Lee Group in 2003 and 2004 proved that the dust was indeed WTC dust, having its unique chemical signature. Part of this signature, the RJ Lee Group said in its final (2004) report, was “spherical iron . . . particles,” and this meant, it had pointed out in its 2003 report, that iron had “melted during the WTC Event, producing spherical metallic particles.”
MindCrazedBanjo 1 year ago
Cont'd The RJ Lee reports thereby provided additional evidence that temperatures had been reached that significantly exceeded those that could have been produced by FIRE!
LOL back in your armchair you pussy deplonker, facts are facts, something Duhbunkers don't seem to care about lmaooooo epic fail.
MindCrazedBanjo 1 year ago
Thats odd. An entire husk is recovered from this crash, and yet, nothing but a few pieces of scrap metal is found at the pentagon and flight 93 crash site. Hm. Well, I'm gonna go ahead and call bullshit on 9/11.
TheRealPinkMenace 1 year ago
@TheRealPinkMenace An entire 'husk?!?' Bwahahaha!!! Call BS on whatever you want, bro.
pressclick 1 year ago
@pressclick Yes, a husk. A frame. A hollow body. Whatever you want to call it.
TheRealPinkMenace 1 year ago
@TheRealPinkMenace Well, genius, let's think about that one for a second. Could there possibly be a difference between skidding down the runway at 180 knots and slamming directly into a reinforced, missile-proof concrete wall at 500 knots? Could there? Naaah...
Devast8ion 1 year ago
Well dude, with the experiment of the NASA Boeing 720 disaster, we most think about how to reduce lifes at risk when an emergency it's all about, think about that and tell me how would you face , what they call THE END OF YOUR LIFE, Besides, the Crew Resource Management says a lot of that.
Skybolter 1 year ago
SAFEST?!?! Tell that to the families of all those crash test dummies, you insensitive bastard!
34T5H1T 1 year ago 35
@34T5H1T
hahahahahahhahahaa
budel007player 1 year ago
@34T5H1T Crash test dummies aren't alive you fucking moron...
jordanwarvideos 1 year ago
@jordanwarvideos No but they still stay in our hearts and in our memories for their tragic sacrifice.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@34T5H1T actully if you look at the test from the inside, everythings okay
theotherguy245689 6 months ago
@34T5H1T MOst of them survived o.O
lukealandrummond 4 months ago
If the so-called Truth movement has such solid evidence that 9/11 was an inside job, then how come you haven't had anybody indicted? Why are you just sitting on it while the criminals roam freely? What are you doing to free KSM, who's obviously an innocent man being held on false charges?
NRen2k5 2 years ago
It's bad enough that you started spamming your 9/11 bullshit on a video that's completely unrelated, but you couldn't even stick to that. Now you're just trying to insult me.
You should see a psychiatrist.
NRen2k5 2 years ago
You're sitting there basing your entire opinion of the guy based on how he looks, and you're calling US the morons? That's hilarious.
They haven't charged bin Laden criminally for 9/11 because quite frankly it's pointless. They already have evidence connecting him to other terrorist attacks, and they know he's the leader of Al Qaeda. He's also a prime military target. So stacking more criminal charges on his name is kinda pointless.
NRen2k5 2 years ago
You wouldn't know intelligence if it kicked you in the nuts.
NRen2k5 2 years ago
You're hilarious.
NRen2k5 2 years ago
it´s boeing 707
xXgabber19Xx 2 years ago
the title says its a 720, you think its a 707. one of you is wrong.
gnator500 2 years ago
Nope, apparently they can both be right.
I looked it up on Wiki - the 720 is a variant of the 707. It was originally called the 707-020 but then they decided to call it the 720 later on for marketing purposes.
NRen2k5 2 years ago 15
hmm.... interesting.... well thanks for not being a jackass about it. if the interwebs had more people like you..... HAHAHA yeah right
gnator500 2 years ago
Yeah. I don't suffer idiots, whackos and scammers well. You don't seem to be any of those. You deserve common courtesy. :)
NRen2k5 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Anybody who thinks that 9/11 was an inside job needs to have their heads examined. Do us all a favor and shut the fuck up and go get help.
ACDCROCKS135 2 years ago
@NRen2k5 Oh, okay fair enough then. That makes sense.
WesThorburn 3 weeks ago
its both!
GeekSurferFilms 2 years ago
this reminds me of planes crashes on 9/11
Wurood1976 3 years ago
if plane crashes remind you this then you arent plane fan
Artegr4 2 years ago
Hey, on the replay, does anyone know what song is playing? It does sound familiar, but I can't put my finger on it.
Encrypttool18 3 years ago
They piloted the plane through REMOTE CONTROL. Kind of funny that anybody who suggests that the planes used on 911 could have been remotely hijacked is dimissed as some sort of "kook" because people find the idea that a commercial airliner could be remotely hijacked to be beyond belief.
libertyeconomics 3 years ago
they could have, but there's the matter of setting up all of the remote control stuff, and the cameras, because you cant fly blind. They probably had a crap-ton of stuff in the cockpit, so they could control everything. would be kinda hard to get all of the necessary stuff onto a plane.
gnator500 2 years ago 2
It's dismissed as kook because it IS.
Why go through all the trouble of secretly installing remote control on a plane so that the crew can't discover it, and then crash it with passengers and crew on board? Don't you think any of them would be panicked or do anything in the minutes it takes for the plane to leave it's proper flightpath and head first for NYC then straight for the towers?
Why not do it with an EMPTY plane instead? Or maybe the official story's right?
THAT's why it's a kook.
NRen2k5 2 years ago