Added: 5 months ago
From: AssociatedPress
Views: 9,726
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (451)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • These democrat student activists are just so intellectually dishonest, its appalling.

    The only speech they find offensive, outrageous, and requiring of apology, is any speech that is effective at displaying the contradictions and absurdities of leftist liberal ideology. Its an Alinskyite tactic - make your opponent feel that victory for him would be immoral to attain, and that effective weapons are immoral to use against you.

  • why for white $2? Asian students has become majority on campus after the repeal of affirmative action in UC Berkeley.

  • Comment removed

  • LOL the Campus Democrats Leader is all about "feelings" and "ignorance" about the bake sale when she didn't know the purpose of it was to know what SB 185 is really about. WAY TO GO COLLEGE REPUBLICANS!

  • @RPDRPD ???? what's wrong with the bill establishing that college should "Consider the use of criteria and procedures that allow students to enroll who are otherwise fully eligible and admissible but who have course deficiencies due to circumstances beyond their control, and, when appropriate, provide that the admission requires the student to make up the deficiency." Sb 185 Sec.1,(2).

  • Why do whites have this persecution complex? They're all powerful.

  • Why don't the "Campus Democrats" simply understand that the outrage they feel at the Bake sale, is a minor NOTHING compared to the outrage that white students feel when they are subjected to affirmative action? THAT'S THE POINT! People fret and fuss over a BAKE SALE!!! What about having your future opportunities curtailed by a reverse racist system??? Fretting over COOKIES and CAKES??? TRY FRETTING OVER REAL INJUSTICE!

  • So if your an Indian lady cookies are free lol

  • i think its a reasonable idea.....go forward!

  • This is an intelligent protest.

    Much better than the "hold stupid, inflammatory signs up and yell shaming speech towards whoever disagrees with you" style embraced by most leftards and conservatards.

  • It actually made people think. Yeah its all around cookies n cupcakes, but hey you get mad at that, but you don't get mad when you are playing $1000+ for college. Something is up.

  • It seems silly, but it really worked because look at all the attention it got.. I give it a thumbs up.

  • I'm Sorry, everyone is racist and all these people saying that their not are lying to themselves, people are more racist to white people than they are to any other race, dude fuck this shit if people are going to take this as a "racist act" what ever, I'm going to be enjoying my 25c cookie, why you all bitch and complain.

  • @ufster81, wrong. It fosters those who may have had a racist idea implanted and aren't fully racist yet, but nothing else. It shows people that they're the ones actually being targeted.

  • No one cares about racism towards whites, it's only politically incorrect if it's "minority". I'm sick and weary of this country and it's disgusting, ignorant and moronic people.

  • @guilemaster147 don't use the apostrophe in "its" there

  • @aligboyakasha Actually, apostrophe in all of the "its" in that post are correct. It's stands for it is. Replace all of them like that and it makes sense.

  • @aligboyakasha Side note: oh i see the last one is not correct. That one should just be its.

  • This almost definitely proves the US is the most racist country in the world....by far.

  • @ishaan14 yeah, racist against caucasians. basically, if you don't cater to the whims of minorities, you are considered racist by leftards.

  • I know I should not say this, or maybe it has no relevance but I had a recent ASL teacher who denotes himself as Hispanic by origin however considers himself White American in a way because he has no affiliation or association with that culture. You can tell he favors white people over other people or show a sense of connection to them IDK. They say you should not call that out or make apparent of race but the teachers do.

  • I think there is a greater issue that also needs to be addressed like about education and all the points of education from early childhood and early development. IDK exactly what during the process along the way or the platform for their education went wrong or how to make it a right so we do not no longer need to address or put forth bills regarding and pertaining to race. Because in America RACE is such a powerful instrument we are going to have to consider it as it also contributes to it

  • I think the point for this bill is for good. They want to help people not hinder them. Then also like I think the bills is trying to make up for the wrongs in the other aspects of education. We all know just access to resources and higher education is such a powerful point in lifting people out of poverty. So by this passing it is trying to maybe correct the other issues like homelessness unemployment the typical um social problems associated with race.

  • Actually whites are a minority at Berkeley. Majority are asians.. especially in those highly competitive programs such as EE CS, Business. Whites get preferential treatment over Asians males. The douche bag names Shawn Lewis is just another publicity seeker... ignore this idiot.

    Well... Asians should pay $5 while whites pay $2. That sounds right!!!

  • You've also managed to insult all those cultures who don't bake!!! This guy must have been alliance... HORDE FTW!!! My account isn't active so I'm not emphasizing this as strong as I could have...

  • Just because you are against SB 185 you are automatically racist? I am ashamed that people within my own party think like this!

    College admissions should be BLIND to race, ethnicity, and gender. Get the good grades in high school or junior college and stop expecting handouts from the government!

  • However, if you went to Cheyney University or any other HBCU (Historically Black College or University) and your white or asian the roles are opposite. Whites and Asian pay virtually nothing to go to these schools. Why? Because the Whites and Asians are minority at an HBCU. Please, never get all your information from the news, do your own research, and you will find the truth

  • so  with every reaction there is they prove their point

  • White can't these straight white males just sit there shut up and take it?

  • @ufster81

    "there is nothing to dispute with regards to us being responsible for slavery. "

    Whites were being taken off as slaves by the N.African Barbary pirates at the same time as the Atlantic slave trade was happening.

    White "indentured servants" were slaves in America.Blacks were slave owners too.

    But all that upsets your "evil white people deserve to be victims of genocide" narrative does`nt it anti-white?

    Your words are yet more proof that Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-white.

  • @SickofantiwhiteBS

    if you can find the fucking barbary states, you can ask for reparations. since, they ceased to exist years ago, and while united states still stands, your argument is stupid.

    united states is wholly responsible for the crime, but statistics show overwhelming slave owners were whites thus the burden of the guilt lies mostly with them.

    your words are more proof that anti-racism is still most crucial because whites are still mostly racist.

  • Mass immigration and "assimilation" making whites minorities in their own countries is a deliberate program of demographic elimination(genocide).

    Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group

    Yet these anti-whites are complaining about white Americans pointing out obvious anti-white discrimination?

    Debate this: Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

  • Thomas Swift was the master of Satire.....to say that satire is wrong.....is just wrong!

  • Can any anti-whites deny that they want to see less and less white children in their localities due to their belief in "anti-racism"?

    Can any anti-whites realistically deny that is proof they are anti-white? Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white. Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group

    Many now say: Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

  • I am a complete liberal (a Canadian liberal at that!) and I think this is a pretty clever idea. This is a great way to draw attention to the subtle racism of diminished expectations.

  • one again, the modle hard working minority, asian students, will be punished by the affirmative action because of their skin color

  • Bake sale or their tution cost? what's the difference people? A perfect example of reverse racism

  • The vast majority of you kids have never worked in your life and went to school fulltime simultaneously, so you can’t grasp AA. And I don’t mean sitting around a desk, or a supervised apprenticeship or internship. You need hard core child labor and having to study at the same time. no option!

  • Affirmnative action lowers the standards and diminshes the civilizations intellectual assetsGo ahead lie about it.How may judges right now don't understand the constitution?How much of your education is specifically desigend to keep you ignorant and feeling good with it?Do you realize what fools they have made of you?Places on earth with 2000 year old cities and more cell phones than toilets consitute a failed civilization that buys things.What is your civilization becoming?May history spite you

  • bull crap

  • @ufster81: Hey Jungle Bunnies... Let's try the same in reverse, ok? Are YOU, or were YOU, at any point in YOUR life, a slave? No? That's what I thought. ^_^

    Your ancestors sold each other to my ancestors? Get over it, LoLoLoL!!!1one1!!!

  • @Death2Evil

    irrelevant... the conditions that benefited your racist ancestors and their victims, the black people have created this mess for black people. it's the responsibility of the culprits who benefited from these practices, white americans, to pay for the damages. this is simple justice that is practiced everyday all around the world.

  • @ufster81: Paramount... Your ancestors stupidly sold each other to foreigners, and created a "mess" for slaves and those related to slaves. Though if you ask me, we Americans did you a favor. If not for us, you'd still be digging for roots and foraging for berries, lol.

    This is simple; y'all believe you're inferior and need help. ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    i am not black, so it's not my ancestors... however i am assuming that you are white and that bit of pseudo-historical statement doesn't relieve anybody of their responsibilities, especially white people since they, as a group, inherited wealth from their ancestors who benefited from slavery. the payback is long overdue and aa is only a start.

    this is simple, white man will weasel his way out of a responsibility not to pay a buck. history of whites, in one sentence...

  • @ufster81: Some other denomination with an inferiority complex, perhaps? =) I'm a mix, however you little jungle bunnies need to learn that no one alive today is responsible for anything that happened over 100 years ago. ^.^

    This is simple. Whites made the dollar, Whites have the majority of dollars in a majority White country. Maybe you really are inferior...

  • @Death2Evil

    sure bitch, if you think ad-hominem arguments are your ticket out, you're fucking mistaken. it's simple, white stole the fruits of other people's labor, it's their duty to make up for this injustice. of course, you as a typical white, is proof that whites will never be moral people and ideally should be reduced to servants of non-whites for world peace.

    you know, my ancestors, aryans of the medes and the persians had quite successfully done that for centuries.

  • @ufster81: Someone doesn't know what an ad hominem is, lol. I'll help you, out of charity, because I know you need it. argumentum ad hominem; an attempt to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief of the person supporting it.

    People of the present are not responsible for each other, let alone responsible for people of the past.

    Quad Erat Demonstrandum, jungle bunny

  • @Death2Evil

    yes, someone clearly doesn't know that instead of refuting the other person's argument choosing to accuse them of an inferiority complex is an ad-hominem, whereby one refuses to look at the argument and challenge it but instead attacks and focuses on the person making the argument. i am sorry they didn't teach this to you at redneck college.

    people of the present who continue to benefit from the misery of the others are responsible and must give back what is not rightfully theirs.

  • @ufster81: Oh noes, Mr. Jungle Bunny. I refuted you and your argument as soon as I stated the this FACT; "People of the present are not responsible for each other, let alone responsible for people of the past." Argument is done and done at that - I laugh at you out of good spirits, not necessity. ^.^

    Wrong again, spade. =) People of the present who continue to benefit from the misery of the dead, including you, sweetheart, ^.^ must not give anyone, anything. Quad Erat Domonstrandum, lmao.

  • @Death2Evil

    dumbass redneck, it doesn't change anything. personal accusations used as substitutes for arguments are always ad-hominim attacks, no exception, period. you didn't even address my argument, except to make unrelated idiotic remarks, backed with zero facts or evidence as expected from trailer trash son of a white whore.

    now, bitch. since white americans are historically in debt to the black americans, it's only fair to ask them to pay the bill. get it, honky?

  • @ufster81 Says the porch monkey, lol. =) Personal accusations of what? Illiteracy? That's not so much personal accusation as fact, as evident by your incorrect hyphenation and use of "ad hominem." Also, except for the exception noted as "as substitution" in your silly statement, jigaboo. ^.^

    Then denial, black whore.

    Wrong again, coon. =) Whites are not historically in debt to Blacks, because there is no contract, hence no legal obligation. ^.^ Fair, LoL? More like needy, LoL! Got it, darky?

  • @Death2Evil

    you're a senile as well as being a fucking idiot... remember your accusations against me accusing me of having inferiority complex, dumb cracker? is that how pathetic your so-called superior white brain works?

    as i've already proven, dumb cracker, that you resorted to ad-hominem attacks, you have no leg to stand on. of course, stupid crackers like you think insistence in your ignorance and irrationality is a strong point. i define that as being inbred white trash.

  • @Death2Evil

    look up what illiteracy is, btw, you dumb-pasty-ass senile motherfucking inbred trailer trash. i doubt it, but there is a chance that the scope of your retardation might surprise even you.

    i don't blame you btw... it's your brother's fault for impregnation your mother with you and running off with your sister when you needed a father/brother figure.

  • @ufster81:Muahaha! Behold, the sweet smell of victory as my darky dissenter turns true "ad hominem." =) What's up with that, my jive jigaboo? No argument for debt without contract? Muahaha! ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    read the first reply, dumb cunt... this is a two part reply, honky. of course, you weren't even aware of the fact that you could see all comments were you?

    the second part was just making fun of you obviously not being familiar with the meaning of the word, illiterate. boy, your trailer trash skull is hardened by all the beatings you must have received as a kid.

  • @ufster81: No thanks, man. All your cunts have aids, lol!

    I'm not scrolling through a text wall the size of Africa just to uncover another brick of unintelligible aids. Surely, you're last message carried all the value of those dying of HIV/aids in your country of origin. Meaning not worth much.

    "...illiteracy is a term used to describe reading and writing skills that are inadequate..."

    One response at a time, sweetheart. ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    the stupid honky is a retard so he can't use the in-built search function of his web browser. the honky will probably google what a browser is and what a search function is after reading these comments. the honky should not be blamed for being an inbred moron because he is not responsible for his mother being impregnated by his brother. honky will look up for "impregnated" in the dictionary he stole from the public library.

    honky is too stupid to read multiple comments at once.

  • @ufster81: You mean Ctrl+f, lol?! Yeah... Leave it to a spade to suggest searching for unknown terms, LoLoLoL!!!1one1! Ah, sweet victory as the negro ad hominems up a flurry of fried chicken and watermelon.

  • @Death2Evil

    honky shows inbred whitey inferior intellect once again...

    searching for "@Death2Evil" will show all the replies to your comments as you simply press next until you find a comment that is recent... there are timestamps in the comments as to how much time has passed since they were posted. this is a piece of cake for anybody who is not inbred white trash.

    honky is so stupid, honky can't think of the simplest things...

  • @ufster81: Resulting in a wall of text half the size of Africa, LoLoLoL!!!1one1. As jigaboo's comments carry all the weight of Africans dead from aids, they are not worth searching for. ^.^

    It's simple; prove obligation without contract. That's all you have to do, but you won't, because you can't. ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    if you can't read through a few comments, hick, it's not my fault... your stupidity doesn't prohibit me from replying with multiple comments as it happens sometimes the honky doesn't understand things in short explanations, so longer replies are required.

    i don't have to prove anything... simple as that, cracker. your claim your burden of proof. typing the same stupid shit over and over again only demonstrates your inferior intellect.

  • @ufster81: Says da jigaboo, lol! Yo' chicken recipe's not worth my searching. Now get on outta here, boy. 'fore I start bustin out my loony jigaboo lingo and laughing at you more den I already izzz. ^.^

    It's simple; prove obligation without contract. That's all you have to do, but you won't, because you can't. ^.^

    copy/paste, jigaboo ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    hey cracker... provide evidence for your claim that a contract is required for all obligations. you don't sign a contract with the government yet you are obliged to follow the law. you don't sign a contract with the movie theater but you're obliged to follow their rules.

    where is your evidence that a written contract is required for ALL obligations? this is your claim, honky, thus your burden of proof.

    lol @ cracker failure...

  • @ufster81; DAMN, jigaboo! I demand more satisfaction. Jump, jive & wail 'til you be provin' dat debt you be claimin' on da White man. Bring dat good shizzle!

  • @Death2Evil

    and the cracker is reduced to not even pretending to have an actual argument... funny enough, this makes as much sense as the stupid shit you posted earlier.

    hip hip hooray for redneck educashun!!!

  • @ufster81: Whats the  matter, boy? Can't understand your own lingo? Unless proven, there is no debt between Whites and Blacks. Prove you shizzle, boy. I demand more satisfaction. ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    slavery is a proven historical fact... it is proven that the fruits of the labor of one group was transferred onto another without the consent of the former. this creates debt, period.

    what's the matter, cracker? still upset that your wife left you for the black dude? she has the right to be sexually satisfied just like any other white women, don't you think, honky?

  • @ufster81: Yeah; a debt from slavers to slaves. Prove dat still shizzzle exists, son!

    What's the matter, jigaboo? And I'm not mad at all, 'cause my ex-wife caught the aids, lol!

    Yep; she was blonde, lol. I warned her 'bout the aids, but nooo... =)

  • Comment removed

  • @ufster81: OOOH, LoL! You removed yo' comment like da cowardly jigaboo you izzz! I caught a glimpse of it in my Inbox, though. Whatevs, it's coo.

  • @Death2Evil

    you have gotten a reply, didn't you honky... i only removed it because i changed the end part about your wife. the top part is the same, dumbass cracker. stop taking your pasty ass so seriously, because i don't.

  • @Death2Evil

    it's been proven time and again, cracker. the institutions and the people's names as well as their citizenship records, tax records etc. are all documented through the british and the american archives. it is therefore proven that the us of a as a state benefited from this slave labor. it is not a matter of historical evidence being required, it's a matter of simply acting on it.

    as for your wife, her fear of a joyless sex life overcame her fear of death. reflects poorly on you.

  • @Death2Evil

    the debt is proven through historical records, cracker bitch. i am not responsible for your "educashun", that was your cracker fatass parents' job and they clearly failed. the burden of proof is on you to prove that a written contract is always required for obligations. this was your claim, remember honky?

  • @ufster81: Oh, I love this! Prove that a party today is indebted to a party related to a party some time ago. Seriously, that's all you have to do.

    Wrong again, jigaboo. "Prove obligation without contract." means "Prove obligation without contract." A written contract would be proof of obligation, but we both know yo' jigaboo welfare checks don't allow paper in the chicken budget. ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    the party today is the united states. the proof is in historical documents and almost all african americans can trace their heritage through similar documents as well as supporting dna evidence to the slaves. you're barking up the wrong tree, redneck cunt!

    prove that a contract is required for obligation, dumb honky. if you harm someone, the state doesn't look for a contract, makes you pay for damages anyway. DUMB FUCKING HONKY doesn't know shit!!! LMFAO!!!

  • @ufster81: See, this is the good stuff! I love this! Any debt between your ancestors and mine were settled upon freedom - as the government is for the people. Quad Erat Demonstrandum. =)

    Prove obligation, lol! Prove that you've been harmed, lol! ^.^ MUAHAHA! Dat nigga's crazy.

  • @Death2Evil

    my ancestors weren't slaves, dumb honky. i am not black as i said four times before.

    and no, freedom is a right, not a privilege so you can't give someone freedom in return for their labor. try again, immoral white honky cunt. you are a perfect example of the inbred white race, always greedy and always looking to exploit others.

    the harm has been proven, it takes some reading of the historical documents, which is obviously above your capacity. LMFAO!!

  • @ufster81: So you a wannabe nyucka... Even worse, LMAO!

    Wrong again, wannabe. As the government works for the people, any and all debts were expunged as the government continued to work for the people. Try again, jigaboo. I'm having a good ol' time. ^.^

    Prove the harm, jigaboo. Bring me a hundred darkies, and I'll ask them each to make an argument for how slavery has harmed them. ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    still, beats the shit out of being an inbred redneck. LMAO!

    the government is not above the people and is responsible for reparations for the damages inflicted... none of the debts were expunged because there is no historical document to prove this, you're flat out making shit up, honky.

    the harm has been proven... read your fucking history, slavery harms the slaves, there is no dispute over this on any intellectual level except redneck idiots like you who think it doesn't harm.

  • @ufster81: Says the wannabe jigaboo to I, a mix of all the best the human gene pool has to offer. I love being satisfied with my race. ^.^

    I know, right? It's like your imaginary debt, only better because it's based on logic. 1) Your debt be between slave owners and slaves. 2) Any indirect benefits to government go back to the people, making any debt long since paid.

    Yep. Slavery harms slaves. Now let's gather up a million Whites and Blacks, and ask them how many have been slaves or slave owners

  • @Death2Evil

    you can't even form a rational argument and can't refrain from succumbing to your emotions, leaving hateful comments on my channel. i seriously doubt your inbred genes are a source of jealousy to anyone, even to a bonobo ape. LMFAO!!

    slave owners pay taxes, have bank accounts, invest in business, the state benefits, the bankers benefit, the industrialists benefit, the whole economy benefits... the debt is on all of these, period.

    how many blacks effected by slavery? almost all.

  • @ufster81: Oh, no, boy. I'm about as hateful as apple pie, ya dig? I simply relish in the opportunity to righteously use terms like "jiggaboo" and "jungle bunny." It is a rare opportunity, as advocates for "positive racism" are equally rare. ^.^

    You kidding? Sahelanthropis tchadensis envied my immortal voice of reason. ^.^

    'Fraid not, boy. The debt's long since gone and all benefits have been returned to the people. LMAO you jiggaboos would go after the weatherman for Hurricane Katrina. ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    and those delusional mumblings were supposed to be a reply?

    they read more like the explicit display of honky intellectual inferiority embodied in a pissed off redneck spewing nonsense because his wife ran away with a black guy.

  • @ufster81: ad hominem, lol

    Hey, dude? Have you managed to prove the existence of this debt all these years later? MUAHAHA

    Nah. Our beautiful women favor money and diamonds above all else, and you jiggaboos can barely afford your chicken. ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    historical documents provide ample evidence... apparently the senile redneck forgets what he reads after 10 mins.

    your beautiful women will have your diamonds in their safes and money in their bank accounts and our cocks in their pussies. no reason for them to settle with 4 inch redneck dicks for the rest of their lives as punishment for one drunk night at the prom.

  • @ufster81: Wait! You have evidence?! Let us see it, then, lol. Prove Blacks today are suffering due to slavery and we just might have grounds to remove a policy. ^.^

    Though none of that really matters considering you're apparently homosexual. =) No wonder y'all are dying to aids, lol! ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    it's been presented time and again by the historical documents. you can read, can't you, redneck cunt?

    it's proven that slavery has effected black people negatively, it is undeniable, yet you claim there is no proof somehow?

    what a fucking loser, you are redneck bitch!

  • @ufster81: Which documents? Where? Bring them forth, and let us see you prove this debt you speak of. Come forth, peasant, lest you be proven racist again. ^_^

    LoLoLoL@mad jigaboo

  • @Death2Evil

    dumb hick, read on the legal history of the united states... slavery was legal, and is recognized today as a crime against humanity. all the evidence needed for reparations, period.

  • @ufster81: Which documents? Where? Bring them forth, little jigaboo. Slavery has been in and out of legality here and there since it's inception. Bring forth your documents as evidence of modern peoples' obligation to Blacks.

    I am waiting, peasant...

  • @Death2Evil

    you don't need to wait, my little bitch, us was founded 1776, slavery legally existed until 1865.

    you want more evidence, my little bitch, 13th amendment that abolished slavery was passed in 1865. until than, you can't claim slavery was illegal in the united states.

  • @ufster81: And...? As stated, slavery's been in and out of legality here and there since its inception. Will you not bring forth the documents of obligation, peasant? Or are you just another sad, little racist? I am patient...

    But while we're on the note of legality, please do present your documentation of legislature explicity legalizing slavery. ^_^

  • @Death2Evil

    as i stated, no contract is required to prove obligation. you are the one who has to prove that a written contract is required for obligation, because it's your stupid little claim, bitch, not mine!

    now, little bitch, will you provide the legal evidence proving that all obligations stem from written contracts or should i just declare victory and move on because i'm getting tired of owning your racist ass.

    come on cracker, at least be original!

  • @ufster81: Then how will you be proving this obligation you speak of, jigaboo? The claim of obligation is yours, jigaboo, bring forth your proof of claim, peasant. I am patient...

    No originality needed, jigaboo. Victory is mine until you prove your claim. Be it by audio, video, signed contract, or otherwise. =)

  • @Death2Evil

    the claim of obligation has been established on the merits of us being established as a state where slavery was legal. now, my sad little cracker bitch, you refuse to see this, because you're a sad little racist bitch. on the other hand, for the people who know their history, there is nothing to dispute with regards to us being responsible for slavery. this, even for an inbred hick like you should be quite easy to grasp, my little bitch. i've already demonstrated this claim, honky.

  • @ufster81: In other words, you have no proof that anyone is obliged to do anything for anyone... "B-b-but the p-poor c-colored folks should have free help!" It really is pathetic, even for a jungle bunny, lol. ^_^ Can I get some more jump, jive & wail? =)

  • @Death2Evil

    in other words, i have the whole history of the united states as proof.

    evidence no 1. slavery was legal in the united states.

    evidence no 2. slavery wasn't abolished until 1865.

    evidence no 3. blacks can trace their heritage through legal documents and dna analysis to the slaves.

    evidence no 4. overwhelming majority of slave owners were white and legal documents prove it.

    all the proof in the world presented, case closed, honky bitch.

    LOL @ inbred honky :-)

  • @ufster81: Watch this, LMAO!

    1) Proof and relevance?

    2) Relevance?

    3) Proof and relevance?

    4) Proof and relevance?

    No case, period, ROFLMAO! If you can't prove the present responsible for the past, you're going to have to try harder to entertain me. ^_^

    LOL@mad jigaboo :-)

  • @Death2Evil

    1. before i go on to provide the evidence, lets make sure of one thing. are you really claiming that slavery was not legal in the united states? unless you are making this argument, there is no reason you should want this data. relevance, provides the moral and legal basis for the argument for reparations.

    2. same with number 1.

    3. same with number 2.

    4. same with number 3.

    the cracker is so confused, he is laughing at his own ignorance.

  • @ufster81: I don't think all the fried chicken in the South could stop your flow, LoL!

    1. Before you provide no evidence, let's make sure of one thing. Like so many things, it was specified as neither legal or illegal until someone in govt. took exception.

    2. So-called "reparations" are racism.

    3. So-called "reparations" are racism.

    4. So-called "reparations" are racism.

    the jigaboo so jive, he still dancing for me, LMAO

  • @Death2Evil

    that's the kind of comment expected from a redneck who sells his own wife/sister for fried chicken money, inbred retard.

    1. international law disagrees, you inbred redneck bitch. slavery is a crime against humanity and there is no statute of limitation on that or prohibiting retroactive application of the law. since slavery was legal in the united states, the state owes reparations to the victims' extended families.

    2. you're inbred.

    3. you're a honky.

    4. your name is cletus.

    LOL

  • @ufster81: LOL@bloody vajayjay mismatching stereotypes.

    1) Actually, international law AGREES. See The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 4. See the part about reparations? =) Yeah; it's not there, LMAO! ^_^ Also, the state as it exists never authorized slavery, but feel free to go after The Confederacy. viel glueck!

    2) bleeding

    3) wannabe black

    4) vagina

    LMAO!

  • @Death2Evil

    1. you're a moron. international law decides on what is a crime, as in the case of slavery, the specific penalties of the crime is not decided by the general law regarding the matter. maybe, the redneck in you prevents you from learning but had you actually read a book, you would have known reparations in the past has been used in similar cases, primarily the jewish holocaust, japanese internment camps etc.

    2. the redneck, aka cletus

    3. is too dumb

    4. to have a clever comeback.

  • @Cletus

    In an early international court case, the Permanent Court of International Justice called the obligation to make reparations for an unlawful act "a general principle of international law" and part of "a general conception of law" (Factory at Chorzów [Germany v. Poland], 1928 P.C.I.J. [ser. A], no. 17 at 29 [September 13]). This reflects the fact that all legal systems require those who cause harm through illegal or wrongful acts to take action to repair the harm they have caused.

  • @ufster81: Oh, goodie gumdrops. The bleeding vagina at least has some substance to its flow. =)

    Unfortunate, for you bloody thighs lolness, your case still fails. ^_^ 1. The state as it stands has not and does not do harm. 2. Prove harm. 3. Those deserving of reparations and those responsible are dead.

    I suggest y'll vaginas file in the appropriate jurisdictions, LMAO!

  • @Death2Evil

    hey cletus, is that your way of conceding an argument? crying and bitching about how my case fails without providing a shred of rationale or evidence as to why... boy, you're one inbred cracker. now, go fuck yourself like your brother did your mother.

  • @ufster81: LMAO, now look who's in denial. =) WINNING, easy as 1 2 3. ^_^

  • @ufster81 The average "person" in poverty in the US own things such as a house, a car, a television, and an xbox for the kids, thanks in no small part to the taxpayers. Children in low-income areas also receive a public education worth about $120,000 k-12. Since minorities are overrepresented in low income areas and we are talking about those that the system causes harm to, what wrongs are you referring to? BTW, slavery ended in 1865.

  • @ufster81 And if we are going to punish or reward races based on "wrongs of the past," why don't we punish all black parents for the wrongs that their kids are committing while we're at it. In 2007, a black man between the ages of 18-35 was 8 times more likely to commit a homicide than a white man in the same age range. Using your logic, all black parents should pay reparations for the children that "they" are producing, even if their children happen to be law-abiding, productive citizens.

  • @ufster81: MUAHAHA! Isn't it a shame that the puss puss block button doesn't keep comment notifications out of your inbox?

    If you can't stand the heat, then get out of my kitchen, boy.

  • @Death2Evil

    are you proud of being a nuisance, honky?

    perhaps you should be. this must be the pinnacle of your pathetic life.

  • @ufster81: Proud to harass racists, any day, every day, 24/7 ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    i take that as your confession of not having a life.

  • @ufster81: Here, boy! Here! Keep up, son! Or ima get bored... "Oh noes, I'm being stalked on teh internetz!" That was a good one, jigaboo, but try to keep up. One good joke is not enough to sate my appetite for comedy. ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    read the community guidelines, honky!! oh noes, honky can't read long texts... LMFAO!!!

    your appetite for comedy was dead the day you walked in on your mother and brother, honky. it killed your inner child, turning you into the bitter loser fucktard that you are today.

    LOL!!

  • @Death2Evil

    dumbass redneck forgot the burden of proof lies with him to prove that all obligations are as a result of written contracts, which is what the honky must prove to ask for a contract in the first place. honky fails... at life.

  • @ufster81: "Some other denomination with an inferiority complex, perhaps? =)" Leave it to the jigaboo to confuse accusation and inquiry, LoLoLoL!!!1one1

    It's simple, prove obligation without contract; that's all you have to do. But you won't. =) Because you can't. ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    it's not an inquiry if your goal is not to inquire, dumb honky? you asked a rhetorical question, with the deliberate intent to imply i had an inferiority complex, thus making it an accusation... honky is too stupid to realize the difference.

    i see the honky has once again failed to demonstrate even an average level of intellect... understandable given honky's inferior genetic heritage of a long line of inbred honkies.

  • @ufster81: Awe, jive jigaboo is now realizing another failure, and trying to excuse its poor argument with its poor reading comprehension, MUAHAHA! DOUBLE WHAMMY! =)

    It's simple; prove obligation without contract. That's all you have to do, but you won't, because you can't. ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    idiot... i don't have to prove to anything on your terms. you have to demonstrate your argument with evidence... it's your claim, your burden of proof.

    honky is still too stupid to make any sense.

  • @ufster81: 'Fraid not, jigaboo. It's your argument that Whites are historically indebted to Blacks. The burden is on you to prove debt without contract. Now, can I get you to jump, jive & wail for me some more. ^.^

    Jigaboo rollin' out dat fried chicken and watermelon, ad hominem, lol!

    t's simple; prove obligation without contract. That's all you have to do, but you won't, because you can't. ^.^

  • @Death2Evil

    idiot... slavery is a historically documented fact. it's exploitation of labor. what the fuck have you been smoking to think that the people who committed these atrocities would be willing to prepare any contract?

    no legal document is required for what is historically documented as a fact, dumb cracker. only the delusional moonshine guzzlers with parents who are first degree relatives can claim such a stupid thing.

    the cracker fails.

  • these comments are like reading a book

  • Wow I am liberal but this is too far. For once i am siding with conservatives. This is bringing awareness, look at all attention it is getting.

  • @mary162000 I consider myself pretty liberal too and I am also siding with the Republicans. These people crying 'racism' over minorities not being admitted obviously do not understand the concept of admissions.

    You are admitted to college based on your ACADEMICS not your race and ethnicity.

    Should I be admitted to a college because I am Irish? After all, my ancestors were oppressed! I hope people realize how stupid that sounds.

  • @ufster81 As long as you have a chip on your shoulder about the past and seek handouts from whites as payment you will be in chains.

  • @winthiswar

    i don't have any chip. i am not black. as long as the effects of the past still effect the condition of the people today, the responsibility is on the ones who created the conditions of the past to remedy them. simple and to the point.

  • @ufster81 thats what im talking about bro. what about asians?

  • @alteredoptions

    the thing is i am not black and i don't see why some self-proclaimed liberal whites have an issue with affirmative action, as i read from the comments.

    a simple analogy for all to understand the issue... two boxers in the ring competing for the title, white boxer a headbutts (slavery, lynching, jim crow etc.) black boxer b and when the ref steps in to allow boxer b to simply recover (affirmative action) from this injustice, he complains that this is unfair to him.

  • strange that the "i'm not racist but" christian-white-republican assholes missed the point that blacks were forbidden from having cookies in the first place for 400 years, by white people. sorry, cunts, you don't get to rewrite history and claim you're not responsible for their miseries as your parents and grand-grand parents benefited from their misfortune for centuries.

  • 2$ for a cookie ? ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR DAAAMN MIND ?

  • I agree it does more harm than good. And is just a lazy tactic.

    You will just turn off the hundreds of 18-25yr old students who are there to grow as individuals and meet people outside of their social and cultural strata.

    Try handbilling, using thought-provoking questions. Be equipped with facts. Takes more than just setting up a controversial bake sale. You actually have to engage in intellectual discourse w/ the Berkeley student body

  • I'm a liberal, I'd prefer AA to be based on income rather than race...

    however, whatever you might think about AA,

    this bake sale is genius.

    It is very clever, and it points out racism the berkeley republicans perceive.

    The democrats here dont look too good.

  • Democrats who are racial minorities are offended by this bake sale while I'm offended that I'll be discriminated against because I'm White....

    Strange world we live in.

  • I'm a liberal if there ever was one, but I agree with these republicans and am sick of democrats wanting apologies for everything they get offended by. it's enough to make one sick.

  • F_cking hilarious. The hypocrisy of the left is absurd. They'll push FOR racism in admissions then take offense when race is used to determine the price of a cupcake. Priorities anyone?

  • Yeah buddy i'm going to get some cookies lol

  • I wonder how many white democrats on campus would be willing to vacate to make room for somene else?

  • Wait...they're complaining about LOWER prices for minorities? I don't even think the liberals know what the liberals want anymore.

  • Native American women eat for free

  • @Zach1740 lol i wonder why they didnt think of that 

  • @Zach1740 thats what im talking about man

  • sean should be more sensitive to this issue.He seems gay.