It's all loosely related. The only real difference is that Iraq is not a part of the U.S. thats all. besides that, good observation ... good arguement.
Workers of the world unite against the money grabbing politicians, mafias and gangs !!!
Unite against the greeedy and bloodthirsty corrupt capitalistic system and their Nationalist rats !!! Unite against the poverty, homelessnesses, crimes, wars !!!
We dont have to pay their economic crises !!!
We dont have to feed the money grabbing politicians anymore !!! As long as we unite they can not survive !!! As long as we divided we can not fight for our rights; HUMAN RIGHTS !!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@workergirls - you could not be more wrong... Communism and Fascism are two sides of the same barbarian coin. Capitalism (TRUE capitalism, NOT market-interventionist capitalism) is FREEDOM and is a system based on ENLIGHTENED SELF-INTEREST..... Communism & Fascism are both authoritarian systems of government with static class systems where a ruling-elite controls the whole society; there is no room for advancement and your labor is a possession of the almighty state.... aka- you are a slave.
i bet you have no idea what communism is about nor stands for. I bet you don't even know why communism failed. the idea of communism is dumb as hell there can never be equality it's simply impossible. which is why Obama is looking like an idiot by trying to make everyone equal
I've seen the Soviet hardware Saddam's Ba'athist regime used to have in its military. Some of it is in a museum at Ft. Hood, in Texas. I know that the Ba'athists are socialists, and are still allies of the Russians (now under Putin's cronies). I'm quite familiar with the facts of the situation - and of the pattern of lies the Marxists have been peddling for the last few decades.
The insurgents that murder Iraqi civilians, and that are hated in Iraq, are not "Minutemen". They've also lost.
Saddam's regime had ties to the first attack on the WTC. When the second attack brought them down, the US formed a Coalition of allies and attacked Iraq.
MArxists tried to save their ally. After he was defeated, however, tehy claimed Saddam was a US ally all along and got his weapons from the US (to include the poison gas Saddam actually received from the old Soviet Empire back inthe 1980s). Marxists then tried to form an insurgency against the Coalition and tried to bill them as "Minutemen".
The Soviet Union supplied Iraq with weapons during the Iran-Iraq war (there literally was a scandal in the US when it was found out that Oliver North had supplied the Iranians with weapons and spare parts), The US, throughout the war, tried to end the war rather than take sides.
Marxists backed Iraq's attempted takeover of Kuwait. Failing that, they tried to get the sanctions on Saddam's regime lifted. Saddam was a major supplier for the PLO and a strong Marxist ally.
why cant people just stop thinking about countries as things...
i mean look at iran! it is obvious that there ist not one iran but rather a lot of people that now try to improve their lives in their country
im sure that there are also american people that do not hate iran and the most people that do so are only victims of media.
please stop living with prejudices and be more sensitive and careful about the thoughts of others towards you. it is far more satisfying to listen/learn than to hate.
[[ \())K } } this is cute but it is WRONG history may have somewhat in the past repeated itself [[but]] the colonials were not Muslim IRAQ is the French did not have NUKES IRAN will the English did not have NUKES the US does the colonials did not have OIL but IRAQ does the French did not hate ISRAEL but IRAN does the colonials killed millions of Indians in USA The IRAQIES kill??? the colonials won freedom from England but IRAQ has???the biggest US military base in the world
@MrShizzleDog hey you stfu i know we used nukes in ww2 i get that but thats because your panzy ass military didnt even bother helping us in asia. australia and new zealand were the only ones who did help us so we had to use nukes the only way to get rid of the suicidal japanese
Lol i like how they attacked the english AFTER the french and indians were defeated. All this bullshit about the blood of tyrants etc - it was because they didnt want to pay back what the war had cost in taxes of which actually benefitted them anyway in development etc. I think phillitupp summed it up
I heard that the Founding Fathers wanted to extend west into native country but the king years ago made a offer to the natives because of how kind they were to the pilgrims to not go any further west and set up trade routes with them which they lived in peace but this did not go down well with the rich colonists who wanted more and so blamed taxes for independence even tho those taxes were benefiting your country we know what happened next killed women children this is not in your history books
im sorry, but there is just no logic. Sure you can say we went over there for oil, but what happened in the french indian war was that France attacked a British Fort and so Britian got into war with France and the french had deals with the indians so the indians were on france's side, and the american colonists were involved in the war because there mother country was in war. Once you based your whole theory on that bit of info your story wasnt factually.
You miss one major point. The colonials were British Citizens. Last time I checked the Iraqis didn't consider themselves American Citizens. The crown considered it a civil war and sought to crush it.
If Iran develops nuclear weapons you are painting a nuclear bulls eye on your back,wheather its a American nuclear strike or an Isreali nuclear strike your just as Dead..
But on the upside think of those 200 virgins in the after life LOL..
"isreal and america are not dumb enough" you say that as if we cant obliterate you and push ur country so far back u will actually see what happened in The American Rev. War yourselves
Yes thats true. But would that be a shock? England left almost a year ago, its about time america did.
People like to talk about americas involvement in the Iran Iraq war, but Russia had an even more manipulative role, supplying both armies with weapons and gear.
Same as Vietnam and Egypt, Syria and Jordon during the 6 day war, iraq in both gulf wars, they love to try out there old equipment to see how it fares against the west.
Your comparing Iranians support for terrorism to that of the french's support during the american revolution?
You do realise France lost Canada and ultimatly there own country to England, Waterloo, Trafalgar, the beheading of king Louis XVI, history class needed? So if history repeats itself iran will fall and its president will live in Exile?
well, if that was true then america wil be kicked out of iraq like the british were kicked out of america.well we will have to let time show us what will happen next. nothing is certain, the same way all graet empires fell at some point, the US will not always be victorious.
You are correct. Every great empire in the history of the world has fallen and given rise to new ones. America will not be on the top forever. I just hope that does not mean we will all die and our ashes blow away in the wind.
true but sadam was a mass murderer of the Kurds, he wiped out over 20000 villages, bush may not be much better but at least they havent been wiped out like the kurds
It's all loosely related. The only real difference is that Iraq is not a part of the U.S. thats all. besides that, good observation ... good arguement.
MegasAlexandros28 1 year ago
*☭
~ dont forget the nuclear weapons sold to iran by mr ronald reagan and the funds given to the nicaraguan contras narcotraffic militia...
~ innocent citizens in the american allied vietnam slaughtered and sometimes raped by american GI s even when they didnt even support the vietcong...
~ rising fascism in usa being black people and white population sworn enemies...
~ the new black fascist president obama who sent 60.000 more soldiers to slaught and rape the afghan people...
workergirls 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Workers of the world unite against the money grabbing politicians, mafias and gangs !!!
Unite against the greeedy and bloodthirsty corrupt capitalistic system and their Nationalist rats !!! Unite against the poverty, homelessnesses, crimes, wars !!!
We dont have to pay their economic crises !!!
We dont have to feed the money grabbing politicians anymore !!! As long as we unite they can not survive !!! As long as we divided we can not fight for our rights; HUMAN RIGHTS !!!
workergirls 2 years ago
capitalism and fascism are two sides of the same barbarian coin...
workers of the world unite against the money grabbing politicians...
Long live great communist revolutions !!!
Death to fascist and capitalist corruptions !!!
workergirls 2 years ago
shut up you idiot. You have no idea what is communism about.
Leon1700 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@workergirls - you could not be more wrong... Communism and Fascism are two sides of the same barbarian coin. Capitalism (TRUE capitalism, NOT market-interventionist capitalism) is FREEDOM and is a system based on ENLIGHTENED SELF-INTEREST..... Communism & Fascism are both authoritarian systems of government with static class systems where a ruling-elite controls the whole society; there is no room for advancement and your labor is a possession of the almighty state.... aka- you are a slave.
JoeLoro 2 years ago
i bet you have no idea what communism is about nor stands for. I bet you don't even know why communism failed. the idea of communism is dumb as hell there can never be equality it's simply impossible. which is why Obama is looking like an idiot by trying to make everyone equal
wthom16 1 year ago
I've seen the Soviet hardware Saddam's Ba'athist regime used to have in its military. Some of it is in a museum at Ft. Hood, in Texas. I know that the Ba'athists are socialists, and are still allies of the Russians (now under Putin's cronies). I'm quite familiar with the facts of the situation - and of the pattern of lies the Marxists have been peddling for the last few decades.
The insurgents that murder Iraqi civilians, and that are hated in Iraq, are not "Minutemen". They've also lost.
DrCruel 2 years ago
Saddam's regime had ties to the first attack on the WTC. When the second attack brought them down, the US formed a Coalition of allies and attacked Iraq.
MArxists tried to save their ally. After he was defeated, however, tehy claimed Saddam was a US ally all along and got his weapons from the US (to include the poison gas Saddam actually received from the old Soviet Empire back inthe 1980s). Marxists then tried to form an insurgency against the Coalition and tried to bill them as "Minutemen".
DrCruel 2 years ago
The Soviet Union supplied Iraq with weapons during the Iran-Iraq war (there literally was a scandal in the US when it was found out that Oliver North had supplied the Iranians with weapons and spare parts), The US, throughout the war, tried to end the war rather than take sides.
Marxists backed Iraq's attempted takeover of Kuwait. Failing that, they tried to get the sanctions on Saddam's regime lifted. Saddam was a major supplier for the PLO and a strong Marxist ally.
DrCruel 2 years ago
why cant people just stop thinking about countries as things...
i mean look at iran! it is obvious that there ist not one iran but rather a lot of people that now try to improve their lives in their country
im sure that there are also american people that do not hate iran and the most people that do so are only victims of media.
please stop living with prejudices and be more sensitive and careful about the thoughts of others towards you. it is far more satisfying to listen/learn than to hate.
gamdsch 2 years ago
reconorder 2 years ago
fuck you reconorder
who cares who is MUSLIM
america, only countrie to EVER use nukes offensively ...
OIL isn't a reason for war
AMERICA HATE IRAN
HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF IRAQIS
THE FUCKING WAR ISN'T OVER NOBHEAD
MrShizzleDog 2 years ago
@MrShizzleDog hey you stfu i know we used nukes in ww2 i get that but thats because your panzy ass military didnt even bother helping us in asia. australia and new zealand were the only ones who did help us so we had to use nukes the only way to get rid of the suicidal japanese
xWhocaresxX 2 years ago
Comment removed
reconorder 2 years ago
Lol i like how they attacked the english AFTER the french and indians were defeated. All this bullshit about the blood of tyrants etc - it was because they didnt want to pay back what the war had cost in taxes of which actually benefitted them anyway in development etc. I think phillitupp summed it up
rulebrittaniaPTBB 2 years ago
Silly comparison.
flippysnotze 3 years ago
It's not a fair comparasion.
Hughganaught 3 years ago 3
wow there are alot more opinions in this then there are facts
alphaheli1 3 years ago
I heard that the Founding Fathers wanted to extend west into native country but the king years ago made a offer to the natives because of how kind they were to the pilgrims to not go any further west and set up trade routes with them which they lived in peace but this did not go down well with the rich colonists who wanted more and so blamed taxes for independence even tho those taxes were benefiting your country we know what happened next killed women children this is not in your history books
phillitupp 3 years ago
Yay Capitalism!
alphaheli1 2 years ago
And the Colonies werent oppressing there own people like saddam was.
jodakid15 3 years ago
im sorry, but there is just no logic. Sure you can say we went over there for oil, but what happened in the french indian war was that France attacked a British Fort and so Britian got into war with France and the french had deals with the indians so the indians were on france's side, and the american colonists were involved in the war because there mother country was in war. Once you based your whole theory on that bit of info your story wasnt factually.
jodakid15 3 years ago
You miss one major point. The colonials were British Citizens. Last time I checked the Iraqis didn't consider themselves American Citizens. The crown considered it a civil war and sought to crush it.
Irony this aian't.
patsfreak 3 years ago 4
usa isnt dumb ig iran continues to make nukes they will be bombed for the protectin of the world...
FallschirmjagerX 3 years ago
The video is funny,it make leaps of logic...
If Iran develops nuclear weapons you are painting a nuclear bulls eye on your back,wheather its a American nuclear strike or an Isreali nuclear strike your just as Dead..
But on the upside think of those 200 virgins in the after life LOL..
ClarksonsinUSA 3 years ago
thats what they said about north K. but never happened. israel and america are not dumb enough to attack iran, but u never know they might be
arya3145M 3 years ago
Why explain...
ClarksonsinUSA 3 years ago
"isreal and america are not dumb enough" you say that as if we cant obliterate you and push ur country so far back u will actually see what happened in The American Rev. War yourselves
Rebel2116 3 years ago
We never should have invaded Iraq and we had better not invade Iran! We need to get out of there now!
colonc84 4 years ago
Yes thats true. But would that be a shock? England left almost a year ago, its about time america did.
People like to talk about americas involvement in the Iran Iraq war, but Russia had an even more manipulative role, supplying both armies with weapons and gear.
Same as Vietnam and Egypt, Syria and Jordon during the 6 day war, iraq in both gulf wars, they love to try out there old equipment to see how it fares against the west.
8G00SE8 4 years ago
Your comparing Iranians support for terrorism to that of the french's support during the american revolution?
You do realise France lost Canada and ultimatly there own country to England, Waterloo, Trafalgar, the beheading of king Louis XVI, history class needed? So if history repeats itself iran will fall and its president will live in Exile?
8G00SE8 4 years ago
well, if that was true then america wil be kicked out of iraq like the british were kicked out of america.well we will have to let time show us what will happen next. nothing is certain, the same way all graet empires fell at some point, the US will not always be victorious.
arya3145M 4 years ago
You are correct. Every great empire in the history of the world has fallen and given rise to new ones. America will not be on the top forever. I just hope that does not mean we will all die and our ashes blow away in the wind.
colonc84 4 years ago
true but sadam was a mass murderer of the Kurds, he wiped out over 20000 villages, bush may not be much better but at least they havent been wiped out like the kurds
burkesean2890 4 years ago
Zendebad Iran! Zendebad Iraq! Marg bar Amrika, doshman-e jahan!
YaAli71 4 years ago
i agree with u. do u think it will ever stop repeating?
iranian4life5000bc 4 years ago
We went to war with Iran? Shit how come no one told me?
arkgunslinger 4 years ago
thats true.
persiandudeee 4 years ago
Ey val.
ZendeBaadShahab 4 years ago