Do the CG women have to talk that fast? Also, can you come up with a better costume for darWIN girl. The Angel looks so much hotter and makes darWIN girl less credible by her lack of competitve hotness.
A good way of describing the difference between macro and micro evolution is "Timescale". That's it. Aside from how long they take, they are exactly the same
They think the world is 6000 years old, the world was flooded with 28,600ft of water, there was a sheet of ice covering the earth and a magic man in the sky is watching their every move.
It is being put forward now that the minority of people are truly homosexual or heterosexual, that the vast majority of us are actually bisexual, though we do tend to lean more to one side than the other.
It was in an article in Scientific American written by Robert Epstein a while back.
That's not the point. The point is some religious people say homosexuality is unnatural but when someone points out that homosexuality is abundant in nature they come back with something having to do with morals when the point they made in the first place had nothing to do with morality. On the point of "why must it exist in humans". it does not have to. however, people should not have their sexual orientation restricted as long as act of sex is between consenting adults.
I'll assume by "must" you mean why is it so. Answer: Because we're part of nature! Duh. Animals, human or otherwise (we're animals, remember?), are occasionally homosexual, exclusively or otherwise, for specific molecular reasons. Its prevalence attests to its age, i.e. to its presence in the common ancestor of many animals. What would be really weird is no humans being homosexual at all. That'd be like the human species having a unique haemoglobin, in contradistinction to other animals.
You asked why something we know (genetic influences on homosexuality have a prevalence in humans typical of mammals) is so, then I told you why (long evolution answer), then you said I have no right to expect it. Never mind what i have a right to expect - it's actually so. Even if the burden of proof were on me to show humans are the same, rather than on you to show they're not, they have been shown to be the same. That's why you asked your 1st question. Talk about forgetting! Deccha was right.
well...the bigger question, I think, is why you seem to get your panties in a bunch over what other people do with their reproductive organs...
that aside, why would you expect something that is found in nature NOT to be within the human population? do you understand that humans are part of the natural world...?
i am not a homophobe. rehash, dechha how dear you pull the wool over these peoples eyes. you know that nearly every single study dealing with humans and links between biology and homosexuality has been done with men, and men only. don't you think it's important to include the other 50% percent of the population before drawing any bold conclusions that, may i remind you, are dealing with human lives. let's get it right the 1st time.
I find your attempt at distraction to be abundantly suspicious. It would honestly have been less suspicious for you to have said "Actually, yes, I DO hate gays." That would have left me with more doubt.
And, as a matter of fact, there was an entire chapter in "Why men don't listen and women can't read maps" about the causes and signs of homosexuality. Lesbians are definitely there.
And, HOW is this one video murdering people or whatever?
Did you know the girl Smurf was sent into Smurf-en land to subvert them by their evil alchamist enemy (what was his name?) but eventually joined them for the rest of the story...?
...and Smurfs are blue because that was the only colour pencil the creator could find at the moment of creation...
Do the CG women have to talk that fast? Also, can you come up with a better costume for darWIN girl. The Angel looks so much hotter and makes darWIN girl less credible by her lack of competitve hotness.
MrPlaid81 2 years ago
racist creationist? Can you see the differance?
cycimian 2 years ago
A good way of describing the difference between macro and micro evolution is "Timescale". That's it. Aside from how long they take, they are exactly the same
Vehementi 2 years ago 2
Limited imagination?
They think the world is 6000 years old, the world was flooded with 28,600ft of water, there was a sheet of ice covering the earth and a magic man in the sky is watching their every move.
How is that not an imagination?
themanwhoknew 2 years ago
It is being put forward now that the minority of people are truly homosexual or heterosexual, that the vast majority of us are actually bisexual, though we do tend to lean more to one side than the other.
It was in an article in Scientific American written by Robert Epstein a while back.
bobomcgraw 2 years ago 2
this agrees with my own personal observations and opinions.
EloquentiaSerpentis 2 years ago
LMFAO at the last 2 seconds of that clip !!
YES !!
captcaveman4201 2 years ago
Nice video the last two seconds of the video made me laugh.
fatrat600284 2 years ago 2
just because homosexuality exist in nature, why must it exist in humans????
19fas88 2 years ago
That's not the point. The point is some religious people say homosexuality is unnatural but when someone points out that homosexuality is abundant in nature they come back with something having to do with morals when the point they made in the first place had nothing to do with morality. On the point of "why must it exist in humans". it does not have to. however, people should not have their sexual orientation restricted as long as act of sex is between consenting adults.
systematic101 2 years ago
They also argue that homosexuality is unnatural and at the same time claim that humans are above nature.
bobomcgraw 2 years ago 2
I'll assume by "must" you mean why is it so. Answer: Because we're part of nature! Duh. Animals, human or otherwise (we're animals, remember?), are occasionally homosexual, exclusively or otherwise, for specific molecular reasons. Its prevalence attests to its age, i.e. to its presence in the common ancestor of many animals. What would be really weird is no humans being homosexual at all. That'd be like the human species having a unique haemoglobin, in contradistinction to other animals.
PokemonGoldenOldies 2 years ago
I understand what you're saying, but I disagree because you're drawing lines in the sand, where you have no right. There are always exceptions....
19fas88 2 years ago
You asked why something we know (genetic influences on homosexuality have a prevalence in humans typical of mammals) is so, then I told you why (long evolution answer), then you said I have no right to expect it. Never mind what i have a right to expect - it's actually so. Even if the burden of proof were on me to show humans are the same, rather than on you to show they're not, they have been shown to be the same. That's why you asked your 1st question. Talk about forgetting! Deccha was right.
PokemonGoldenOldies 2 years ago
well...the bigger question, I think, is why you seem to get your panties in a bunch over what other people do with their reproductive organs...
that aside, why would you expect something that is found in nature NOT to be within the human population? do you understand that humans are part of the natural world...?
1n354a 2 years ago
why should you assume such a staunch position on the matter, instead of having a clear mind to the subject?
19fas88 2 years ago
19fas88,
Just so you know, I have nothing but absolute hatred for Racists, Nationalists, Homophobes, and so forth.
However, I don't like to block people unnecesarily. Best to be carefull about who I block.
So, one quick question; what's your opinion of gay people?
dechha1981 2 years ago
i am not a homophobe. rehash, dechha how dear you pull the wool over these peoples eyes. you know that nearly every single study dealing with humans and links between biology and homosexuality has been done with men, and men only. don't you think it's important to include the other 50% percent of the population before drawing any bold conclusions that, may i remind you, are dealing with human lives. let's get it right the 1st time.
19fas88 2 years ago
I find your attempt at distraction to be abundantly suspicious. It would honestly have been less suspicious for you to have said "Actually, yes, I DO hate gays." That would have left me with more doubt.
And, as a matter of fact, there was an entire chapter in "Why men don't listen and women can't read maps" about the causes and signs of homosexuality. Lesbians are definitely there.
And, HOW is this one video murdering people or whatever?
Anyhoo... Blocked.
dechha1981 2 years ago
Oh, that is a brilliant book. Glad to see someone else has read it.
PokemonGoldenOldies 2 years ago
LOL good shit
tattooskin72 2 years ago
i can see your getting better and better with Poser, congrats! I like that program. what version you go?
Cnidarious 2 years ago
Droping moral standards to the level of the animal kingdom? Humans are a part of the animal kingdom.
xxxFaustusxxx 2 years ago 3
I have been trying so hard to point that out to people. We are by definition animals.
systematic101 2 years ago
Infact the traits Diagnostic to humans means we can`t be anything else...
Cnidarious 2 years ago
I'd say humans are considderably worse as a matter of fact.
dechha1981 2 years ago
Apparently poor math skills are endemic to the creationist community, reminds me of the Hoyle nonsense they keep dredging up.
Btw, cool mermaid you got there, how much you asking for it?
TETSUno1 2 years ago
Love that last exasperated yes :D
Ryuwyvern 2 years ago 6
That alone earned this 5 stars
GoblinXXX 2 years ago 2
Thats not a goldfish, its a mermaid damnit- you must be blind not to see that it is a mermaid.
ScottTheAtheist 2 years ago
Did you know the girl Smurf was sent into Smurf-en land to subvert them by their evil alchamist enemy (what was his name?) but eventually joined them for the rest of the story...?
...and Smurfs are blue because that was the only colour pencil the creator could find at the moment of creation...
Just some Smurf-en facts... :)
RodHullIOnceWasHim 2 years ago
Gargamel
dechha1981 2 years ago
That's the fella... I loved that guy :D
RodHullIOnceWasHim 2 years ago
Fun fact: In Greek dubs they named him Drakoumel... so of course he can't have been Gargamel.... therefore Christianity is true.
...
...
What? Its at least as coherent as most theist arguments!...
Cafeeine 2 years ago 2
Gargamel also made Smurfette :p
naughtypagan72 2 years ago
You can fix it by adding yt:stretch=16:9 in the tags I think.
Killdozer6006 2 years ago
I think it worked. Thanks!
dechha1981 2 years ago