Theft By Deception 9of9 - Deciphering The Federal Income Tax

[goodfellow67216]

that was a masterful work ... talk about getting your mind blown .. this is a master piece of information ... I would love to get a transcript of this .. do you have that available ... thank you and God bless you.

[xxdjcharlierockxx]

awesome video and narration job explaining all this...it would be interesting to find out who won these court battles,how they won them and spread the news like a wild fire. i will visit the url's later today

[heffer84]

Thanks for pointing me in the direction of how I should use that phrase cause now it makes perfect sense to me that section 861 only covers several people who are taxed. And since everything points to section 861 for determining taxable income, I assume under inclusio unius est exclusio alterius income not mentioned is not taxed. LOL, Ret Squid, you're a HORRIBLE GOVERNMENT AGENT. It's now obvious you are because you replied so fast with pre-typed responses. Haha, hope you can sleep well @ night

[RetSquid]

@heffer84

Actually, having debated this on here for YEARS I have a database of cases that prove any of your argument wrong. And yes, some income not mentioned specifically IS taxed, read Section 61.

[heffer84]

@RetSquid LOL, you've been employed as a government troll for that long uh? Not bad... Sorry though, most people are waking up and finding out there is a cybercommand that focuses on infowar. RetSquid, you're better off knowing which side to be on. The most patriotic thing you can do is NOT defend the criminal government but uphold your oath and DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION. If you think your job as a troll is patriotic, it's not. Please reconsider. The government has been hijacked by bankers.

[RetSquid]

@heffer84

It's kind of interesting that people claim I'm a shill (or troll) when they start to learn that they really DON'T know as much as they thought they did about income tax. Also, if you think I like the current regime, you are nuts. The facts are the facts, the income tax is imposed on every citizen and their income from anywhere in the world. I continue to uphold my oath, even if you can't see that.

[heffer84]

LOL, since he responded so fast I'll write one last reply to Retired Squid, although he keeps using strawman court cases to try win the argument. Like I said, I still need to investigate this but its amazing me how vehemet and hardcore Squid is trying to convince me with illogical fallacies. I mean, he defies his own argument by saying that latin phrase is for figuring out the intent. So according to that phrase, the intent of Section 861 is to tax nonaliens and foreign income and nothing more.

[RetSquid]

@heffer84 Even a casual reading of section 861 and its regulations makes it clear that the statute and regulations were enacted to deal with the problems of calculating the taxable incomes of nonresident aliens, or for dealing with special provisions for taxpayers with incomes from sources outside of the United States. Section 861 is part of Subchapter N of the Internal Revenue Code, which is titled “Tax Based on Income From Sources Within or Without the United States.”

[RetSquid]

@RetSquid

More specifically, section 861 is in Part I of Subchapter N, and Part I is titled “Source Rules and Other General Rules Relating to Foreign Income.” The other parts of Subchapter N are titled “Nonresident Aliens and Foreign Corporations,” “Income from Sources Without the United States,” “Domestic International Sales Corporations,” and “International Boycott Determinations.” Are you beginning to see a pattern?

[RetSquid]

@heffer84

Show how ANY of the cases I post are 'strawman" arguments.

[heffer84]

I'm done arguing with trolls like RetSquid though. I still need to fully investigate this myself, but it's annoying when someone can't even watch a video and know what the video is saying.

[RetSquid]

@heffer84

I've watched this video, in fact, the entire series, that is how I know it is absolutely wrong.

[asicit2b]

The "Individual" what, is listed under "NORMAL" taxes and Surtaxes. Do a study on

the beginning of what "NORMAL" means.

[nateholio]

MasterPhil, you do realize that, in most cases, under Title 26 of the U.S.C. you must ALLOW your employer to send your withholding to the IRS right? In most cases the code does not allow for automatic withholding by employers - it is rather "opt-in". You would then become liable for withholding, determining your taxable income, and informing the fed gov't of it instead of having your employer do it. If the gov't doesn't know about it, they can't bill you for it, but they'll sure try.

[prof5string]

@nateholio No, in most cases the employer is required to withhold. See 26 USC 3402.

[RetSquid]

This whole series of videos is based on a lie that chapter N has something to do with people in the U.S. receiving income from within the U.S.

Only Chapter A matters for most people.

[heffer84]

@RetSquid Hmmm, you must not have watched it. I'm just as skeptical, but it's clear that Chapter N does define sources of income within the United States. I will have to look into this more. I find it interesting that the index to the Internal Revenue Code DOES NOT specify a "liability for income tax." Proof it's not in the index watch?v=B2AkTRQuSrQ

[RetSquid]

@heffer84

Title 26 Section 1 provides the liability. As a Citizen all of your income from any source is taxable unless specifically exempted. The source (foreign/domestic) does not matter.

[heffer84]

@RetSquid Yeah.... He hasn't watched it.

[RetSquid]

@heffer84

I guess you didn't read Section 1, did you?

[heffer84]

@RetSquid Hey moron, I'm sick of crap illegitimate crap put out by people like you! It's obvious you haven't watched this and you're only here to try stir things up. Keywords in Section 1 are "taxable income." Taxable income is defined in various sections of the IRC but it all circularly refers back to Section 861, which by law only imposes a tax on certain income. Under inclusio unius est exclusio alterius, anything not specifically mentioned mentioned is NOT TAXED; this is common law!

[RetSquid]

@heffer84

Actually, this is "taxable income":

TITLE 26 > Subtitle A > CHAPTER 1 > Subchapter B > PART I >

§ 63. Taxable income defined

(a) In general

Except as provided in subsection (b), for purposes of this subtitle, the term “taxable income” means gross income minus the deductions allowed by this chapter (other than the standard deduction).

[RetSquid]

@heffer84

“Expressio unius est exclusio alterius” is a maxim of statutory construction, and translates roughly as “the expression of one meaning is an exclusion of others.” The maxim “is an aid to construction, not a rule of law. It can never override clear and contrary evidences of Congressional intent.” Neuberger v. Commissioner, 311 U.S. 83, 88 (1940). It “serves only as an aid in discovering the legislative intent when * * * [it] is not otherwise manifest." United States v. Barnes

[RetSquid]

@heffer84

Why don't you try and find a case that overrules Great-West Life Assur. Co. v. United States?

[RetSquid]

@heffer84

“The determination of where income is derived or ‘sourced’ is generally of no moment to either United States citizens, “The determination of where income is derived or ‘sourced’ is generally of no moment to either United States citizens or United States corporations, for such persons are subject to tax under section 1 and section 11, respectively, on their worldwide income.”

Great-West Life Assur. Co. v. United States, 230 Ct. Cl. 477, 678 F.2d 180, 183 (1982)

[heffer84]

@RetSquid LOL, that quote makes no sense. It's like if I told you "the source of where that mercury comes from has no relevance because the local newscast says mercury is good for your brain." And yes its true that a newscast does say that, which everyone knows is asanine. Essentially what that quote, what I presume was the judges quote, speaks for the intelligence of the sayer because they're using common illogical fallacies that you learn about in any beginner college philosophy class.

[RetSquid]

@heffer84

That has got to be one of the dumbest posts I've seen in a long time, care to try again?

[shadowcii]

federal possesion could equal federal instrumentality which a bank is and therefor would be taxable.

[MasterPhil175]

Too bad that if we tried to not pay federal income tax, we'd be thrown in jail or something.

[arch571332]

The only way to get around that is if too many people agreed not to pay at the same time. There would be too many people to arrest, they would have to change their policy and get rid of the FED.

[victor2cutube]

very good we can only hope the truth will get out soon

[felixq78]

The "Truth" is out already. At the core of the problem is the ignorance, fear and laziness of the American people.

[MatosUpNorth]

It's funny ya know! Like... the guys below me tells us to look at the IRS web site for the truth! Some people just don't get it. Do I file? Yup! But only because I don't owe the government any taxes, and I get the earned income credit, which means I get all the money back I "lent" to the government. If I owed taxes...I would not file. I do not meet the requirements to file, the rules for "Income from within or without the US." This series has educated me...and my friends and family.

[SouthernFriedHoney]

Matos dumb ass, if  you are getting earned income tax credit, that is WELFARE. That is nice word for welfare.

YOu are getting far more money FROM the government than you gave it, dumb ass. You didnt loan shit.

If you don't want EITC -- dont file. You won't get your welfare. EITC goes way beyond a refund dumb ass.

You don't have to claim EITC -- be a man. Don't take welfare.

[NawwLeans]

Are you kidding? Taxable income is thoroughly defined in the tax law (and on the IRS Web site). There is wage income, interest and dividend income, capital gains, alimony, rental income, lottery winnings -- you get the idea. And there's a place for each and every one of them on your Form 1040 tax return.

Sorry to be the one to break the bad news. Denial isn't your friend.

[angryadrien]

@NawwLeans:

Thoroughly defined? HOW??

You can't "define" a word by pointing to a different group of words that sound similar.

The so-called definition that you are referring to is a deception.

People are deceived too easily, usually out of FEAR OF REPRISAL FROM THE MEN WITH GUNS, that's the problem.

[SouthernFriedHoney]

Angry look up the word synonym. That's not how IRS defines various income.

There IS one major conspiracy by the Congress regarding taxes -- to keep workers paying BY FAR the highest tax rates. Those who actually work, those who actually operate the business, or are self employed, or work somewhow, are taxed 2-4 times as much as those who make money by credit sways, leverage buy outs, derivities, capital gains.

Tax all income alike, make it simple.

[bearhamo]

I thank you for getting the word out. I have forwarded this to many of the doubters who did not believe.

[Arachnidia]

A job well done. I certainly enjoyed the details. Kudos. Out of curiosity, do you pay taxes?

[ghulk562]

never in my life have I seen, or heard something so defined in detail than this video set of 9 represented here. Granted the monotone voice was hard but, the direct evidence of education was overwhelming. No theories, opinions, ect... Just the Letter of the law. I wish religion was this easy!!!

P.S. yes he did buy the undercoat to his car, because he IS the manager of the dealership!!! LOL...

[WarzSchoolchild]

Great series, very clear explanations, I appreciated the constant repetition of salient points! They need to be memorised. The only downer, is that I note just 714 views on this final episode. 714,000 would be more encouraging!

COME ON YOUTUBE FANS, SPREAD THE WORD!

[RetSquid]

"Compensation for labor or services, paid in the form of wages or salary, has been universally held by the courts of this republic to be income, subject to the income tax laws currently applicable. . . . [Taxpayer] seems to have been inspired by various tax protesting groups across the land who postulate weird and illogical theories of tax avoidance all to the detriment of the common weal [sic] and of themselves." United States v. Romero, 640 F.2d 1014, 1016 (9th Cir. 1981).

[qtzlctl2012]

I bet you're the type of guy that buys the "undercoat" from teh car dealership cause the manager says it's good for you.

[shredsickgnar]

Awesome video series thank you so much for posting!

[hanzo2001]

OK. It is clear that after almost 90 minutes of legalese I can now face an IRS Taxman and make him shove his 1040 up his arse, puke it, rinse and repeat...

Crap! I would be an alien in the US so I'd be taxable! How do I become a resident then?

American's, Fight for your rights and your freedom!!!

[h1ghj3sus]

Thanks for all of the effort jasrid04.  I love people like you.

[closk01]

great...irs sucks my butthole

[forced4motorsports]

One of the best eye opening videos ever. I am taxable, being a resident alien, but that does not stop me from wanting all the people of the united states to stand up for what is right and just. I wouldn't stop Ron Paul or the likes from repealing the 16th, but it really does seem unnecessary. I think it is in need of some serious clarity and to have some of the removed text replaced and 861-8 uncluttered. I think Ron Paul should watch this!

[rationalbloke]

You've summed up my thoughts perfectly. Thank you.