Freud - Psychoanalysis

[CrystalaBoo]

whaaat the fuckkkkkkkkkk lol

[NinjassBlackyChan]

Freud was highly aroused......as a scientist! lol Dumbest line ever!!!

[chriswilliamstool]

listen to tool - eulogy

its about being awake to the outside world from looking inside yourself 1st

maybe it can relate to this with guided lyrics about body and mind communications

[Izaak247]

This is so much fucking easier to understand than my teacher explaining it

[chriswilliamstool]

@Izaak247 lol no other word fits between "much easier" other than "much MORE easier" -___-

[matjesworld]

Freud himself once said: "The civilized society is perpetually menaced with disintegration through this primary hostility of men towards one another." - There is not really more to analyze.

[newfan7]

Psychoanalysis isn't a science it's an ideology or a pseudoreligious doctrine!

[isaysee]

@newfan7 * If Freud pioneered icecream- many would just blame him for tooth decay & diabetes. As a child & student he showed talent at research & investigation. As a Dr., he said people r suffering from things that r purely mental & cures/relief can be gained thur study of MIND.

 Analysis is an endeavore. Psycho is derived from Greek word for soul. -SO, it's a *PROCESS* aimed at comprehending an abstract thing that developes out of brain. Makeup a name you like better if u prefer - MindMining?

[newfan7]

@isaysee:

A science is based on facts and not on beliefs as something like the unconscious! Thus Psychoanalysis isn't a science and escecially not of the human mind. - I hope you understand this?

[isaysee]

@newfan7- SCIENCE>derived frm Latn SCIENTIA=KNOWLEDGE. U use phrase "A SCIENCE" in deified way. Seems ur say'n FACTS r based on FACTS. AnyHOO, "not a science" isn't my issue. There are zillions of things that Psy'An isn't- but it's diffinately "A PROCESS". You don't like findings of others? - OK- draw own conclusions &/or methods. - You've proved the nonexistence of "UNCONCIOUS"? - The world is waiting to hear. You think Freud in error?- Correct or ignore him. Freud is Freud- Process is procs

[newfan7]

@isaysee:

Facts are something that can be observed and which is not speculative. So tell me how do you measure teh unconscious? It's only a hypothesis but what are the facts psychoanalysis is based on? I guess the base on which it is founded are the thoughts of Freud and nothing else. But these thoughts aren't unconscious of course. Well you can say the reason of phenomenon is a foreign and concious but destructive will which had caused some trouble in the patients mind. - So what?!

[isaysee]

@newfan7- Facts NOT speculative? - OK, if u mean RELATIVELY speaking. QtmPhz sez *FACT*=our highest level of confidence @ this time & Hstry shows this true. U shuda sed DEMONSTRABLE insead of "OBSERVABLE", [ NONmaterials hard to see or measure]. To some people, FACT is what they'been told by Superiors/Experts/Etc- and that works 2 sometimes.

Facts indicate some people SHOULDN"T analyse ANYTHING & history shows that others have derived benifits thur scientific delving. Each can choose .

[isaysee]

Re my comment- [ Neurosis;*also ill defined ] ->> It would go a long way toward comprehendability to simply define NEUROSIS as *undesireable and/or detrimental convolutions one can experience and/or suffer resulting from one's interference and/or struggle with one sexually motivated impulses *. If one reads the prevalent definitions, it's easy to see how psychobabbled the field of MindMending&Maintence has become.

[redpillow100]

it would be a natural reaction, the aim is to understand, not deny or repress.talking about stuff puts things into a logical and sensible way in the mind, so the hysterira is about confused thinking and feeling, and talking helps put things into a logical order.

[redpillow100]

it would be a natural reaction, the aim is to understand, not deny or repress.

[Achilles1389]

To get a real understanding of Freuds character and his motivations watch the video titled...

" Freud, Zionism and Sexual Revolution "

[headlessgirl1394]

I guess she "blinded him with science" xD if you know what I mean lol.

[danielz4485]

it is my understanding that dispite all you might hear about the human mind even today we dont really know how it works. we know its basic components: neurons, synapses... we know the anatomy and we have some good theory about sertian parts of the brian. notably the visual cortex.

& we learned some ways to manipulate the mind as a whole.

take an analogy of a car: knowing what basic parts it has, knowing some driving. but without knowing how the engine really works.

[IdEyeOne]

Thank you Sigmund.

[Naproxenum]

incest ftw

[cfcreative1]

Little joke : Scientists were able to bring back Freud and Jung to life. So they go to a mental hospital and are asked to see one of the patients. Freud looks at the patient to determine any signs and the emotional state and then calmly asks "how are you feeling?" Jung then dialogues with the other staff and they increase that medication of the patient. The next week Jung is hired as the head of staff and the newest patient is Freud. Some of you will get this some of you won't.

[frogshine]

Freud was listening to crap.... poor guy

[sicknessguitar87]

"freud was highly arroused... as a scientist" LOL

oh freud, you naughty boy...

[xenamanny]

@sicknessguitar87 hahha ,,, what do u mean ??? is freud sexually aroused...lol

[lovesGenet]

Lacan and most philosophers,psychoanalists etc all have great respect for Freud.Reading his work does that to you .His insight and ability to find correspondences.Though much research has proven his theories not wholly correct you will find few more acknowledged and cited.Those who have not read FREUD SERIOUSLY have no idea of his importance in literature he is like a bible!

[vanderbilt887]

@Lucifer986

You're reducing Freud's thought to a single straw-man which you can conveniently attack. The idea that the human can be understood solely on the basis of the scientific method is part of an ideology to which I do not suscribe. (Freud by the way was no stranger to the emprical method). In contrast to what you're thinking, Freud's ideas have also been influential in the philosophy of mind and neuroscience.

[Lucifer986]

@vanderbilt887 i am not subscribing to the empirical view i lean more towards th existentialist view of man which is anything but material. But sex IS material and frued attempts to provide hucum to a materiel thing. Sex was gained through evolution, procreation keep species alive. Nothing more and nothing less. No acclaimed or respected philosopher has accepted frued.

[vanderbilt887]

@Lucifer986

"No acclaimed or respected philosopher has accepted frued"

This is factually incorrect. And your point apropos of sex, evolution and materiality completely misses the point - I won't bother any further.

[WKRPinCINN]

the chick in this clip is HOT!!! she looks JUST LIKE my mom!!!

[DETROITBULLET]

This trash he just as well could have decided this woman was telling her story and was happy to get it off her chest mind or what ever .Transfeerance is a bullshit theory . But it sounded good at the time some one should have been watching this guy day and night to see if his experiments were valid . they didnt and so you have a one party opinion and a whole science built on it . garbage

[MrsJacobBlack717]

was freud married?! i swear he was...but this video says hes sexually inexperienced?

[vanderbilt887]

The core ideas of psychoanalysis are not orginal to Freud, but mostly to Nietzsche and Shakespeare, who profoundly influenced Freud. Consider from MacBeth, where he is confronted with the doctor who is unable to cure his wife (who is having hallucinations), when he says:

[Lucifer986]

@vanderbilt887 PLEASE DO NOT PUT NIETZSCHE AND SHAKESPEARE IN THE SAME SENTENCE AS FRUED. what frued did was take Nietzsche idea and rape it and the end product of birth is this sham that we call psychoanalysis. There absolutely nothing behind it accept a very clever manipulation of language how it got accepted into the academic world i have no idea.

[vanderbilt887]

@Lucifer986

I do whatever the fuck I want. Besides, the chance that your knowledge of Shakespeare, Nietzsche and Freud outtops mine is smaller than you quantum tunneling through a reinforced concrete wall. And though psychoanalysis *as it existed in Freud's days* is pretty most a fossil field nowadays, it has been tremendously influential for very good reasons.

[Lucifer986]

@vanderbilt887 you do what you want exactly and what you have done is imposed something where it does not belong. There is no similarity between frued sexual crap and Nietzsche the term "subconscious" is as far as it goes for Nietzsche contribution. As for Shakespeare all i can say LOL yeah right he was occupied with thoughts of fucking his parents as opposed to tragedy and the existentialist questions of man ...please

[Lucifer986]

@vanderbilt887 "it has been tremendously influential for very good reasons. " give me 1

[vanderbilt887]

@Lucifer986

No. You're just going to be a cynic, ignorant little asshole about it, so I won't waste my time any further with you (which you, no doubt, will interpret as winning your little pissing contest, but I couldn't care less). Instead, I let W.H. Auden speak my final words:

"‘if often he was wrong and, at times, absurd / to us he is no more a person / now but a whole climate of opinion / under which we conduct our different lives"

[Lucifer986]

@vanderbilt887 lol the Quote is complete and utter rubbish if we accepted it we would still thinking the world is flat. My problem is you ignorance of Nietzsche. Frued sexual crap is material its dependent upon bodily functions of hormones etc there is nothing more to sex. Freud took Nietzsche subconscious out of context and made it something else entirely.

[Lucifer986]

@vanderbilt887 If you have incestuous desires towards your mother then i can understand why you would accept Freud in an attempt to justify your feelings. But i accept arguments on the basis of empircel evidence and logic and rationality. Philosophers of mind and science has disproved Freud over and over again and again.

[dakev3]

oder du bist schon zu fertig von koks!

[dakev3]

ich kann trotzdem arbeiten !!!

das ist deine persönliche faulheit........

[Mann1979HH]

AN ALLE ERWERBSUNFÄHIGE DURCH PSYCH: PROBLEME!!!! Habt ihr auch irgednwie das Gefühl, dass ihr wegen eurer psych. Krankeheit von scheinbar gesunden Menschen diskriminiert werdet? "Experten" meine zwar, ich hätte schiophrenie, aber die kommen mir nicht so kompetent vor, aber fakt ist, dass ich aus psych. oder nervlichen Gründen nicht arbeiten kann, und die Leute auf Kontaktbörsen und so immer keine Zeit für mich haben. Was für Erfahrungen habt ihr gemacht?

[newfan7]

Freud was one of the greatest charlatans who ever lived. - His work is really shit!

[streetfightsecrets]

how familiar with it are you?

[sanderronda]

Freud was awaken! He stood above the lust. High evolution.

[HapaLife]

The scientist in his pants was highly aroused.

[28PaulS]

Freud was highly aroused......as a scientist! lol

it must be very hard to explain to Freud if you loved him if a passionate kiss doesnt do the trick.

[RockyRoad1166]

It doesn't take a hell of a whole lot to get the facts straight, it's called an opionion! He may be known as the father of psychology but that doesn't mean everyone has to agree with it, again it's just an opionion. You obviously understand ignorance because the word was created for people like you who critcize those with opionions.

[jennytowerlove]

well before admiting that freud wasnt a scientist, it would be a good idea to start studying. Fortunately he is known as the father of psycology which to your poor knowledge is known as science. before making an ignorant statement you must first get your facts straight.

[streetfightsecrets]

actually psychology was originally a branch of philosophy, all attempts to make it a science have been redundant - no one really regards it as science... though psychology, like any field of study can usefully use "scientific method"

[newfan7]

@streetfightsecrets: Psychology may be a science, but psychoanalysis is definitely not one. To me PA is a kind of doctrine based on the dogma of the unconscious. - Here is something wrong!

I agree that the soul is a difficult field for research where it's hard to know something. There are obviously limits in some cases for measuring a phenomenon similar as for the uncertainty principle in physics.

One of the main problems in this field is the ambivalence of feeling and thinking.

[kevinneslund]

Actually, if you understand how tre science works and it's rigid requirements, you'll immediately recognize that neither psychology, psychiatry, or any spin-offs of them are not actual sciences. They are referred to by real scientists as "descriptive science". That is, they simply describe an observed behavior. As far as explaining it goes -- they are clueless and at a loss as to how to proceed because there isn't a method, nor, has there ever been a method, for "explaining" behavior.

[newfan7]

@kevinneslund: I agree that some phenomenon in this field is treated in a scientific way. Neverless there are some 'theories' as psychoanalysis which cannot be called scientifically because there are too many effects or ideas which cannot be researched as the unconscious and some other issues. There are some speculative hypothesis which we cannot prove in a scientific way. - The only way to be on the way of science is that of Pawlow and his followers which is based on material effects.

[kevinneslund]

Rest assured. In the future, historians and lay people will wonder in amazement at how people could have ever allowed themselves to be so duped by such an appalling theoretical construct as the preposterous notion of "psychology" or "psychiatry" are, as they are practiced today. In fact, this is not to say that we don't already have countless critics, within the field of psychology itself, who do so, and have done so, for quite some time. They get drowned out by the massive propaganda.

[newfan7]

@kevinneslund: Yes it's stupid to use the word 'psychology' because the psyche of man has no logos. We must use a better term as 'cognitology' to describe this.

Psychology is a massive 'war field' of various theories and there is no other branche in science where we have such extreme differences of contrary theories.

Every serious expert knows about this fact but they are always doing so that they have real knowledge in this field while some theories aren't provable in general.

[kevinneslund]

What I found to be so nearly overwhelming about psychology/psychiatry is that the majority of criticism of it comes from within the field. Mr. Szasz is now, just one voice in an ever-increasing gargantuan chorus of those who expose and illuminate this farcical charade we have that is not merely a religion, but, a FALSE religion which seeks to persecute and exterminate true religion.

[3choBlast3r]

Freud wasn't a sientist.

He was a Zionist Fuck Faced idiot, who used hypnotism to make his so called patients fall in love with him.

[chrissamuri]

3choBlast3r isn't a critic.

He just can't spell and construct an argument with evidence.

[JacobsJaffa]

Jung destroys Freud!

[JustinNyland]

I like Jung.

[newfan7]

Freud wasn't a scientist, he was an idiot!

All important forces are quite conscious!

[syntax128]

Once I hypnotised a woman and she suck my dick. Ohh, that was the best blow job I ever got. maaaannn.

[syntax128]

I would tell him. Whats up horny bustard... These feelings patients used to get is only cause of the Freuds mind....

[satchi123]

Bastard...are you aware that you were a monkey before u became man...ur morphology is that of a primate...so its obvious that theres a large deal about ur nature and conciousness that ur not aware of.. the brain u presently have is the result of thousands of years of evolution, u possessed it much before human civilization.

[syntax128]

Passion feelings is normal. Lots of people who gor hypnotised had that. I look at man or women and simulate a feeling, make them feel that. Even if that person hates me so much. I did couple of times to women up to orgasm. Man, I would love to talk to Freud. May be I should start studying spiritism. gggg

[AOEGuy]

"freud was HIGHLY ARROUSED....As a Scientist!" LOL !

[Hambidosvinet]

crap no freud on cnn??

[LouisPlume]

Freud caught his teenage daughter masturbating and psychoanalysed her as if it were an illness.

How ever that treatment was done, Anna Freud never married, had a relationship, or sex.

She set herself up as the authority on sexual female dysfunction, you couldn't make it up, what a joke.

[fluoridemakesudumb]

hahaha you rock.

[retardno002]

Well he was the first... it's normal that he made mistakes. We know better nowdays tho.

[tokyomitsubishi]

Are you sure?

[retardno002]

Nope. That's what still makes it interesting.

[englishgirl69]

cbts cheaper too!

[claitontesch]

interesting!!!!!!!!!!!!

[MilliVanilli2007]

why is there not more psychoanalysis in the UK? Besides from financial aspects--why are patients pushed to do cbt instead of psychoanalysis??

[purplestoner]

cos psychoanalysis isnt experimentally verifiable or falsifiable - it isnt scientific in other words so psychologists, most anyhow, dont have any respect for it. unfortunately.

[consciousmess]

Well said, purplestoner. I agree with you, and I must add that something being falsifiable is what gives it credibility and psychoanalysis is so much based on interpretation of the therapist. Thats why it could be abused.

[vounraeb]

Yes, we have all heard the stories of "recovered" memories, that in the end are shown to be the result of leading suggestions from the psychotherapist.

[ABAisSCIENCE]

Sabina Spielrein corresponded & influenced Jung & Freud in their development of psychoanalytic theory (Carotenuto, 1980). Piaget was personally analyzed by Sabina Spielrein in the 1920s. Sabina Spielrein had a relationship with Jung & Piaget (with Jung while his patient). She was 2nd woman to be admitted to Wednesday Psychological Society, in November 1911 (Freud, 1910-1911/1979; Spielrein, 1912). Through Russian Psychoanalytic Society gave several lectures attended by Vygotsky in 1923.

[buffalobillsfan48]

the title through me off what the hell are they talking about. very out of the blue

[austpom333]

how could an insane person like freud become so influential, his thinking is poluted

[jerrylewis333]

Look at how some people have been blinded by L. Ron Hubbard, religious cult or Hitler.

[gcaminos83]

muy buen video! si ponen vigilar y castigar en el buscador de este mismo sitio subi el audiolibro del primer fragmento de Vigilar y Castigar de Foucalt mirenlo y cuentenme que les parece!

[rae4light]

Psychoanalysis continues to frighten people...You might wonder why..thinking also frightens people...I suppose it will remain subversive and poorly understood...

Freud was a beginning, there is much more to psychoanalysis (including research that demonstrates its helpfulness).

[isaysee]

@rae4light -poorly un'stood 2 say LEAST. Small wonder when even matterofact & wellmeant expo like this misinforms. Sayin "NEUROSIS" is caused by sex is saying that explosions are caused by explosive materials. Neurosis; *also illdefined* - is caused by the presures & complications of controlling sexuallymotivated impulses. -ToWit = no repression/suppression/etc = no presure. So, no presure= no neurosis, Therefore PRESURE is the cause, Of courses totally liberated libido is even more problematic.

[jerrylewis333]

Psychoanalysis = cult

It's a 19th century pseudo-science at best!

[zzRider]

Pseudo-science is something that claims to be scientific, but does not follow the scientific method, and lacks strong evidence that justify its claim.

There is nothing pseudo-scientific about psychoanalysis. If anything it's research (hint...] has lead to to many insights into the human psyche. The key word is "research".

[ericcartman321]

Psychoanalysis:

-It claims to be scientific

-Does not follw the scientific method

-Lacks strong evidence that justify its claims

Scientology has lead many insights into the human psyche too...

[zzRider]

And yet Scientology does not like outsiders to observe it's "religious" tactics and the one's that have been reveled - by former members - have shown nothing impressive.

Also - and this is the key point - they do not like the idea of independent research on their methods, thus disproving their support of the scientific process.

One last thing: there has not been any "insights" that came from that religion. I'm sorry to hurt your feelings, but the religion is stupid.

[ericcartman321]

Could you please tell me only ONE study that support the efficacy of psychoanalysis ?

This 19th century pseudo-science should have yielded at least one positive study !

Don't talk to me about "case study" because this doesn't prove anything.

If you can't find a study then tell me only one patient that Freud has cured.

Trust me, I was once a "believer" in Freud.

[zzRider]

"tell me only ONE study that support the efficacy of psychoanalysis" >> "Don't talk to me about 'case study because this doesn't prove anything" Sorry, but that gave me a good laugh.

"tell me only one patient that Freud has cured." Why are we still talking about him, over a century later, if someone was not?

PS: No offense, but I go to YouTube to watch videos, and there are other videos I would rather watch.

[kimmy23x]

For one, a case study is a form of idiographic research. It is scientific. Just not in the way you think of it. Second, Freud didn't try to cure people, he wanted to help them get to the bottom of their issues, and he did this for many. Third, if you come to YouTube to watch videos and didn't want to watch this, why did you? Seems a little silly to me.

[Lucifer986]

@zzRider what has it revealed about the human phyce. Absolutely nothing. Wittgenstein Philosopher of language said if you have a set of consistent rules governing a concept you talk about anything and make it appear genuine "aliens, goblins lol" . Philosophy has logic and reason and science has empirical evidence, psychoanalysis has nothing so that leaves it in the trash can.

[Achilles1389]

Freud makes his JEWISH SUPREMACIST VIEWPOINT very clear in a letter to a Jewish woman who intended to conceive a child by a Gentile

to heal the split in psychoanalysis. His words were:

"I must confess...that your fantasy about the birth of the Savior to a mixed union did not appeal to me at all. The Lord, in that anti-Jewish period, had him born from the SUPERIOR Jewish race. But I know these

are my prejudices."

[Achilles1389]

A year later the same woman gave birth to a child fathered by a member of the "superior Jewish race." FREUD RESPONDED:

"I am, as you know, cured of the last shred of my predilection for the Aryan cause, and would like to take it that if the child turned out to be a boy he will develop into a stalwart ZIONIST."

[Achilles1389]

FREUD CONTINUED:

"He or she must be dark in any case, no more towheads. Let us banish all these will-o'-the-wisps!

I shall not present my compliments to Jung in Munich, as you know perfectly well....We are and remain Jews. The others will only exploit us and will never understand and appreciate us."(quoted in Yerushalmi

1991, 45).

[Achilles1389]

Freud (WHO IS JEWISH) suggested that Christian sexual morality was the cause of mental illness on a grand scale. He relentlessly undermined the concepts of sexual fidelity and the foundations of

marriage. In 1915 he stated:

"Sexual morality — as society, in its extreme form, the American,defines it — seems to me very contemptible. I advocate an

incomparably freer sexual life."

[Achilles1389]

In Moses and Monotheism (1939) Freud repeatedly ATTACKS Christianity while promoting the spiritual supremacy of the Jewish people.

"The people, happy in their conviction of possessing the truth,overcome by the consciousness of being the chosen, came to valuehighly all intellectual and ethical achievements.The Christian religion did not keep to the lofty heights of spirituality

to which the Jewish religion had soared"

— Sigmund Freud

[debunker1905]

To Freud everything had to do with sex...

[jlarry2]

do you know what is "sex"....?

freud never talk about sex ... he talks about sexuality ... that's different

[rjshmo]

What a sick freak, or a complete fraud.

[debunker1905]

you mean a complete freud?

[andersonleedslad]

hes cracked it old boy

[sporksandknives44]

"Freud was highly aroused...as a scientist"

That killed me...lol

[mountain19]

how did he come to the conclusion those feelings for the parents?

[mariquitamarini]

what if you read something about him? the answer is there...

[lazuni]

I loved how this man focused his energy, despite the challenge