Oh leave fashion alone Lucretia :( It may not be self-sustaining (well there is +eco-fashion too) but I find it very offensive when anyone ever discourages something creative :(.
Not against creativity, against spectacles, against commodifying creativity -selling life to people who've forgotten their own. Make your own culture.
When someone makes something like fashion, art, music, or anything of that nature their life, it's often necessary to sacrifice your 'mark' in order to sell. It's the nature of business when you're dealing with peoples' 'wants' rather than their 'needs'. It isn't necessarily a bad thing, great things have come out of it, it can give people direction. However I do agree it can sometimes be devastating to a person who cherises their creativity :(
Art is expression, by default whatever comes out, via whatever medium is a reflection of the creator. If the person is making 'art' in order to sell it, then they are expressing capitalism. They are saying, "The things I make are commodities, pay me for them." Personally, that is bullshit to me. As bullshit as saying, "Pay me to talk to you." or more accurately, "Pay me to blow hot air at you." All this does, along with the associated patent system is make art about money and that is ugly.
Moreover, because art becomes equivalent to money, social stratification occurs. There's now 'high' art and 'low' art. There is celebrity fashion, politician fashion, archon fashion and because these are what people aspire to out of some warped personal perception, Art begins to reflect the real disenfranchisement of the everyday person. Spectacles like this make it all the more so because we are asked to sit here watch envy crave and above all BUY!!!
Could maybe see if you were a starving artisan and you had to sell your culture/art to get by because that's all you have and something beyond your control upset your ability to make it another way but things like this are just greedy silly people make clothes for other greedy silly people so that yet other greedy silly people can turn it into a tv spot, a magazine article, etc. etc. Not about creativity, about money, status, and letting the general populace know they can't have either.
You can profit without being mindful. Intelligence is not by default a virtue and by the same token, since I could say scam artists and capitalists are analogously creative... creativity is not by default a virtue either. Fuck. Fashion. Utility and practicality are what determine how I dress.
You're one of those people who feel they're being a conformist if they were to listen to what society says is a "trend." Well you're not making yourself seem any smarter, ranting about how practicality determines what an outfit should be.
Honestly, fashion is more than a scam, as you put it.
And creativity, as you said, may not be a virtue by default, but that's subjective.
It's not a question of conformity, everyone conforms to a certain extent, it's a question of conscience. I'm not trying to look smart, as I just stated in so many words, imagism is meaningless, what I'm saying is that people are creative and they shouldn't have to pay others to first squash that creativity and then supplant it with so many consumer products.
read Don't laugh at this! Just do it Start thinking something you really really want cause this is astounding the person that sent said their wish came true 10 mins after they read the mail so I thought what the heck You have just been visited by DrSuess's Cat in the Hat. He will grant you one wish Make your wish when the count down is over 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1 MAKE A WISH Send this to 10 videos within the hour you read this. If you do, your wish will come true
If I want to look a certain way, I do it myself. I don't pay other people to tell me how to look cool or professional or whatever.
Lucretia2222 3 years ago
Stupid, Vacuous, Elitist, Capitalist, Boring.
Lucretia2222 3 years ago
Oh leave fashion alone Lucretia :( It may not be self-sustaining (well there is +eco-fashion too) but I find it very offensive when anyone ever discourages something creative :(.
Harrycurtin 3 years ago
Not against creativity, against spectacles, against commodifying creativity -selling life to people who've forgotten their own. Make your own culture.
Lucretia2222 3 years ago
When someone makes something like fashion, art, music, or anything of that nature their life, it's often necessary to sacrifice your 'mark' in order to sell. It's the nature of business when you're dealing with peoples' 'wants' rather than their 'needs'. It isn't necessarily a bad thing, great things have come out of it, it can give people direction. However I do agree it can sometimes be devastating to a person who cherises their creativity :(
Harrycurtin 3 years ago
Art is expression, by default whatever comes out, via whatever medium is a reflection of the creator. If the person is making 'art' in order to sell it, then they are expressing capitalism. They are saying, "The things I make are commodities, pay me for them." Personally, that is bullshit to me. As bullshit as saying, "Pay me to talk to you." or more accurately, "Pay me to blow hot air at you." All this does, along with the associated patent system is make art about money and that is ugly.
Lucretia2222 3 years ago
Moreover, because art becomes equivalent to money, social stratification occurs. There's now 'high' art and 'low' art. There is celebrity fashion, politician fashion, archon fashion and because these are what people aspire to out of some warped personal perception, Art begins to reflect the real disenfranchisement of the everyday person. Spectacles like this make it all the more so because we are asked to sit here watch envy crave and above all BUY!!!
Again: Stupid, Elitist, Capitalist, Boring.
Lucretia2222 3 years ago
Could maybe see if you were a starving artisan and you had to sell your culture/art to get by because that's all you have and something beyond your control upset your ability to make it another way but things like this are just greedy silly people make clothes for other greedy silly people so that yet other greedy silly people can turn it into a tv spot, a magazine article, etc. etc. Not about creativity, about money, status, and letting the general populace know they can't have either.
Lucretia2222 3 years ago
(In response to what Lucrieta said)--
Oh sure, it's very stupid; that's what this whole multi-billion dollar industry is based off of, stupidity.
Are you serious? Fashion is creativity. Eod.
Mizutoki808 3 years ago
You can profit without being mindful. Intelligence is not by default a virtue and by the same token, since I could say scam artists and capitalists are analogously creative... creativity is not by default a virtue either. Fuck. Fashion. Utility and practicality are what determine how I dress.
Lucretia2222 3 years ago
You're one of those people who feel they're being a conformist if they were to listen to what society says is a "trend." Well you're not making yourself seem any smarter, ranting about how practicality determines what an outfit should be.
Honestly, fashion is more than a scam, as you put it.
And creativity, as you said, may not be a virtue by default, but that's subjective.
Mizutoki808 3 years ago
It's not a question of conformity, everyone conforms to a certain extent, it's a question of conscience. I'm not trying to look smart, as I just stated in so many words, imagism is meaningless, what I'm saying is that people are creative and they shouldn't have to pay others to first squash that creativity and then supplant it with so many consumer products.
Lucretia2222 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
novaduh 3 years ago
is great!!!!!!
Osvaldonice 3 years ago
Ye who are blind wear blinders. Yet, those who choose to see, see the blinders.
UnconcernedCitizen 3 years ago
EXCELLENT!
princess200847 3 years ago
Posh is so hot!!!!!!!!!
sg53d 3 years ago