To answer the question posed< African Americans these days are tired of far leftist hypocrisy as well as ⓏⓄmbies who claim enlightenment by being equally extreme as a dirt farming leftists, but in the opposite yet equally flawed direction. Plus it takes access to a certain amount of privilege to be able to stand around and "occupy" that is not as common in the greater African American community as in other groups that were better represented at those protests.
God I hate the occupy kids. Just a bunch of lazy idiots who feel entitled and better than everyone. They only stand for selfishness and scapegoating whoever is successful, or happens to have a job in whatever useless field they decided to study.
Look at Ron Paul's campaign manager who died because he had $400,000 dollars in medical debt and no health insurance. He should have done a better job going around to churches and other charities for help and maybe he'd be alive today. What self-respecting charity would turn not help this guy pay his bills.
@AntagonisticEnemy No, it is not. And such a statement shows a complete lack of understanding in political theory, economics, history, and political semantics.
@AntagonisticEnemy Read Human Action, Wealth of Nations, America's Great Depression, Economics in one Lesson, Road to Serfdom, Crash Proof, and Rand's Capitalism. Then YOU will know what you are talking about with free market (aka Austrian aka real) economics. Read Tocqueville, Hobbes, Locke, Bacon, Hume, Voltaire, Rousseau among others and YOU will know enough to talk of Enlightenment Thinking. Read the Federalist, Declaration, and Constitution to speak of our government. You've not done one!
In the Occupiers' interviews, mostly performed by local medias, the language is so strong, presented with such conviction, yet lacking any understanding of reality or the political and economic systems they discuss. Don't they need to be somehwere soon?
I think they should just get out the hoses, horses, dogs and baseball bats.
These left wing, socialist/Marxist/communist, morally and ethically demented rat bastards need just a good beat down. They need the crap slapped out of them.
To hell with all you repugnant socialist sons a bitches.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
There are black and other minorities at OWS than ever has been at all these tea parties. Secondly these are people taking a stand against what is going on in this nation.
@TheCaliCapitalist What they are doing is being ridiculous, & annoying. If they aren't protesting Washington they have their head in the sand. Our econ problems are just symptoms of the real problem- an irresponsible government.
What they are doing is not ridiculous or annoying. The republicans and some democrats are bought off by the big corps to conitue pushing money towards the rich. They will lobby for more money to the rich which will leave us in a depression. The corps are making record profits with little to no taxes payed back into the system.
@TheCaliCapitalist Some recent economic history. Fanny Mae & Freddy Mac (headed by Democrats) pressured banks into giving sub-prime mortgages to people who couldn’t afford them. Then with their friends in the financial sector, made a fortune off of the derivatives from these mortgages. They then contributed millions to the campaigns of Timithy Geitner (head of the treasury) & Barack Obama knowing they would bail them out when the inevitable collapse came, which they did.
@TheCaliCapitalist Did the OWS protest descend on Washington to protest this? Obviously not. Instead, you joined forces with the unions who pour millions into the Democratic party (where do unions get their money from again?) and every fanatical fringe group that comes along. And when Obama shows up to back you, you applaud like the mindless sheepeople you are when he announces he’s going after the evil rich people (other than the ones who contribute to the Democrats, of course).
@TheCaliCapitalist They are being ridiculous. They (& apparently you) haven't yet realized that business can only ASK for money. The rich can only ASK for money. If they get it then it's the consumer /the government's fault. Also unions far out pace businesses when it comes to campaign donations so your point is weak. Even when they do send lbyists to get money it's just a response to you ordering politicians to take their profits.
People bring that point that unions are the top campaign spenders, but that statistic is deceptive because lobbying expenditures is by far the more effective way to influence politicians. Here's the top lobbying spenders since 1998
Finance/Insurance (4.7 bil), Health (4.7 bil), Communications/Electronics (3.9 bil), Energy (3.5 bil), Transportaiton (2.4 bil), Agribusiness (1.4 bil), Defense (1.3 bil), Labor Unions (a whopping 479 thousand, about 3% of total lobbyist expenditures)
@yeebuddeh1 The only thing that proves, if anything, is that business is better at playing the game. Better to remove the legislative-industrial complex altogether than complain that your bought-&-paid-for special interests are winning against their bought-&-paid-for special interests.
The LOWER 50% pays NO taxes, Now with that in mind isnt "pay your fair share" a anti-lowerclass statement? It is sad that this nation of great thinkers and workers have developed into a bunch of whiners and slackers who want nothing more that someone off to pay thier bills. If they didnt want the Bill dont take out the loan. Pay 45,000 for a college education to sit and whine about the bill afterwards. How pathetic.
I love the Guy Fawkes masks that these people are wearing because they watched V for Vendetta and think they are on the verge of starting a revolution.
@MetaKnight964 Better yet, they have no idea what liberalism is. Capitalism and liberalism goes hand-in-hand. It's called market liberalism for a reason. I wanna see a street full of nothing but Guy Fawkes masks just to get a good laugh.
@MetaKnight964 Liberalism has changed overtime. Roosevelt changed the meaning: low taxes, economic freedom, and social freedom, into higher taxes, economic reform, and retained social freedom. Truthfully, libertarians should reclaim the word liberal, because they are the purest liberals. Modern liberals are a crossbreed of social liberalism, and economic socialism, but socialism still doesn't fly in the electorate, so they chose a more positive word.
@MetaKnight964 I'm sure you're familiar with the term classical liberal? That's an awful term, since classical liberals/libertarians are, by definition liberal. Liberal doesn't mean reform or progression like many have made it out to be. I don't claim to be a classical liberal, but a federalist conservative, as you probably could tell by my name. But I'm very sympathetic to classical liberal economics (free markets, free trade, and low taxes), etc.
@MetaKnight964 Economic conservative (capitalist), pro-national defense, internationalist on foreign policy, moderate on domestic issues, liberal/progressive on social issues, central government trumps states on all issues not pertaining to states' rights and national security, assimilation of all immigrants into American culture, and the union must be preserved (think Federalist Party, Republican Party 1860s, and Republican Party 1940s-1960s).
To answer the question posed< African Americans these days are tired of far leftist hypocrisy as well as ⓏⓄmbies who claim enlightenment by being equally extreme as a dirt farming leftists, but in the opposite yet equally flawed direction. Plus it takes access to a certain amount of privilege to be able to stand around and "occupy" that is not as common in the greater African American community as in other groups that were better represented at those protests.
ShiZuWarrior 6 days ago
God I hate the occupy kids. Just a bunch of lazy idiots who feel entitled and better than everyone. They only stand for selfishness and scapegoating whoever is successful, or happens to have a job in whatever useless field they decided to study.
CruxisFire 2 weeks ago
once again propagating the ows as a bunch of dope-smoking sex crazed cretins. stay classy zo.
prestonofcourse 2 months ago
Look at Ron Paul's campaign manager who died because he had $400,000 dollars in medical debt and no health insurance. He should have done a better job going around to churches and other charities for help and maybe he'd be alive today. What self-respecting charity would turn not help this guy pay his bills.
teapartyxpress 3 months ago
fna, you are 100% correct man
duanescot 3 months ago
I don't agree.
EquipaPatriot 3 months ago
"Libertarians are just liberals who are comfortable with capitalism"
- Zo
You're never going to live that one down. Schmuck.
chuska8383 3 months ago
@chuska8383 But it is true sorry to burst your bubble there
AntagonisticEnemy 3 months ago
@AntagonisticEnemy No, it is not. And such a statement shows a complete lack of understanding in political theory, economics, history, and political semantics.
chuska8383 3 months ago
@chuska8383 Actually no none of what you said is true. Just because you bring words like economics does not actually mean you know anything about it.
AntagonisticEnemy 3 months ago
@AntagonisticEnemy Read Human Action, Wealth of Nations, America's Great Depression, Economics in one Lesson, Road to Serfdom, Crash Proof, and Rand's Capitalism. Then YOU will know what you are talking about with free market (aka Austrian aka real) economics. Read Tocqueville, Hobbes, Locke, Bacon, Hume, Voltaire, Rousseau among others and YOU will know enough to talk of Enlightenment Thinking. Read the Federalist, Declaration, and Constitution to speak of our government. You've not done one!
chuska8383 3 months ago
@chuska8383 That was really said? Someone doesnt understand Libertarians at all.
Khurzan72 3 months ago
BRAVO.
Yankeeprepper 3 months ago
May God forgive you for spreading hate and propaganda.
laflores037 3 months ago
May God forgive you for spreading hate and propaganda.
laflores037 3 months ago
In the Occupiers' interviews, mostly performed by local medias, the language is so strong, presented with such conviction, yet lacking any understanding of reality or the political and economic systems they discuss. Don't they need to be somehwere soon?
ACourtRep 3 months ago
I did a dry spit take at "sage smoked bacon"
CarpeMetus 3 months ago
Zo for prez!
angelsvn 4 months ago
Occupy Wanton Stupidity.
mindsaglowin 4 months ago
Useful idiots, the whole lot of them.
HomelessOnline 4 months ago
Occupy our meaningless lives !
mwangolatrue 4 months ago
Lol. All the related video's have to do with Occupy Wall Street protesters and zombies.
hooplablahblahblah 4 months ago 2
Poopyheads! The lot of them! Right, Zo!
ZombieX13 4 months ago 2
I think they should just get out the hoses, horses, dogs and baseball bats.
These left wing, socialist/Marxist/communist, morally and ethically demented rat bastards need just a good beat down. They need the crap slapped out of them.
To hell with all you repugnant socialist sons a bitches.
Good on you Alfonzo. Excellent video.
GutpileCharlie 4 months ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There are black and other minorities at OWS than ever has been at all these tea parties. Secondly these are people taking a stand against what is going on in this nation.
TheCaliCapitalist 4 months ago
@TheCaliCapitalist What they are doing is being ridiculous, & annoying. If they aren't protesting Washington they have their head in the sand. Our econ problems are just symptoms of the real problem- an irresponsible government.
lockdown260 4 months ago 4
@lockdown260
What they are doing is not ridiculous or annoying. The republicans and some democrats are bought off by the big corps to conitue pushing money towards the rich. They will lobby for more money to the rich which will leave us in a depression. The corps are making record profits with little to no taxes payed back into the system.
TheCaliCapitalist 4 months ago
@TheCaliCapitalist Some recent economic history. Fanny Mae & Freddy Mac (headed by Democrats) pressured banks into giving sub-prime mortgages to people who couldn’t afford them. Then with their friends in the financial sector, made a fortune off of the derivatives from these mortgages. They then contributed millions to the campaigns of Timithy Geitner (head of the treasury) & Barack Obama knowing they would bail them out when the inevitable collapse came, which they did.
primpal08 4 months ago 3
@TheCaliCapitalist Did the OWS protest descend on Washington to protest this? Obviously not. Instead, you joined forces with the unions who pour millions into the Democratic party (where do unions get their money from again?) and every fanatical fringe group that comes along. And when Obama shows up to back you, you applaud like the mindless sheepeople you are when he announces he’s going after the evil rich people (other than the ones who contribute to the Democrats, of course).
primpal08 4 months ago 2
@TheCaliCapitalist Um, the President is doing this, and he's not a Republican, last I heard. It's Republicans trying to stop it.
zvi303 4 months ago
@TheCaliCapitalist They are being ridiculous. They (& apparently you) haven't yet realized that business can only ASK for money. The rich can only ASK for money. If they get it then it's the consumer /the government's fault. Also unions far out pace businesses when it comes to campaign donations so your point is weak. Even when they do send lbyists to get money it's just a response to you ordering politicians to take their profits.
lockdown260 4 months ago 4
@lockdown260
People bring that point that unions are the top campaign spenders, but that statistic is deceptive because lobbying expenditures is by far the more effective way to influence politicians. Here's the top lobbying spenders since 1998
Finance/Insurance (4.7 bil), Health (4.7 bil), Communications/Electronics (3.9 bil), Energy (3.5 bil), Transportaiton (2.4 bil), Agribusiness (1.4 bil), Defense (1.3 bil), Labor Unions (a whopping 479 thousand, about 3% of total lobbyist expenditures)
yeebuddeh1 4 months ago
@yeebuddeh1 The only thing that proves, if anything, is that business is better at playing the game. Better to remove the legislative-industrial complex altogether than complain that your bought-&-paid-for special interests are winning against their bought-&-paid-for special interests.
lockdown260 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The LOWER 50% pays NO taxes, Now with that in mind isnt "pay your fair share" a anti-lowerclass statement? It is sad that this nation of great thinkers and workers have developed into a bunch of whiners and slackers who want nothing more that someone off to pay thier bills. If they didnt want the Bill dont take out the loan. Pay 45,000 for a college education to sit and whine about the bill afterwards. How pathetic.
TheStrazy 4 months ago
Is affirmative action for protests the answer?
j1mmyZeta 4 months ago
These protestors are socialists and the Communists are behind it!
stephenabm 4 months ago 24
(Using Leftist logic..) Occupy Wall Street is racist!
The only blacks that showed up were the Black Panthers, and they were only there to intimidate and guilt trip the hippies.
antimarxism 4 months ago 28
I love the Guy Fawkes masks that these people are wearing because they watched V for Vendetta and think they are on the verge of starting a revolution.
TheFederalistVoice 4 months ago 4
@TheFederalistVoice And they're too stupid to realize that V was more like an anarchist than a liberal.
MetaKnight964 4 months ago
@MetaKnight964 Better yet, they have no idea what liberalism is. Capitalism and liberalism goes hand-in-hand. It's called market liberalism for a reason. I wanna see a street full of nothing but Guy Fawkes masks just to get a good laugh.
TheFederalistVoice 4 months ago
@TheFederalistVoice So why are all liberals anti-capitalist, including the rich ones?
MetaKnight964 4 months ago
@MetaKnight964 Liberalism has changed overtime. Roosevelt changed the meaning: low taxes, economic freedom, and social freedom, into higher taxes, economic reform, and retained social freedom. Truthfully, libertarians should reclaim the word liberal, because they are the purest liberals. Modern liberals are a crossbreed of social liberalism, and economic socialism, but socialism still doesn't fly in the electorate, so they chose a more positive word.
TheFederalistVoice 4 months ago
@MetaKnight964 I'm sure you're familiar with the term classical liberal? That's an awful term, since classical liberals/libertarians are, by definition liberal. Liberal doesn't mean reform or progression like many have made it out to be. I don't claim to be a classical liberal, but a federalist conservative, as you probably could tell by my name. But I'm very sympathetic to classical liberal economics (free markets, free trade, and low taxes), etc.
TheFederalistVoice 4 months ago
@TheFederalistVoice What exactly is a federalist conservative?
MetaKnight964 4 months ago
@MetaKnight964 Economic conservative (capitalist), pro-national defense, internationalist on foreign policy, moderate on domestic issues, liberal/progressive on social issues, central government trumps states on all issues not pertaining to states' rights and national security, assimilation of all immigrants into American culture, and the union must be preserved (think Federalist Party, Republican Party 1860s, and Republican Party 1940s-1960s).
TheFederalistVoice 4 months ago
Making fun of white people is quickly becoming a privilege of the Right. 'Bout time.
Making fun of white people includes making fun of Obama, right?
kangarookirby 4 months ago
lol idiots...
ughduhful 4 months ago
fluorinated...or fluoridated?
nottinmatterz2day 4 months ago
wow...white ppl
nottinmatterz2day 4 months ago
Awesome commentary.
mrtomsr 4 months ago