I'm not a fan of the fenders on the Evo X, so the RalliArt will save me money and allow me to do modifications where I see fit. New tires will be the first upgrade.
Run a set of Mazdaspeed 3 tires on those rims and watch the braking and handling numbers improve significantly. They didn't want the RA to be too close to the Evo on purpose... hence the garbage tires.
Man I'm sick of ppl hating on Ralliart. Most of them have no idea what it's capable of. And a lot of people who have Evos can't drive them legally bc their license was taken away for racing or they don't meet the laws in the state bc they are overtuned in some states for the roads. Ie: if you bought one in California you'd have to have the thing de-tuned. I just want to be able to go fast when I need/want to, I don't need a racecar.
man the specs and performance figures for this car are horrible, I expected it to be much much better! a great disappointment and clear no match for Mazda Mazdaspeed3 which I thought it would be. 60 - 0 in 128ft!!! my moms heavy ass Acura MDX will do better than that!
The 0-60 is about 5 to 6 seconds depending on the driver/tires/mods.
The WRX doesn't destroy it, fanboys. Put the same tires on both and they are close in all areas. WRX slightly wins some and Ralliart slightly wins some.
There is almost no turbo lag to begin with and brake torques are like child abuse to the car.
It only depends on the driver since we are talking about stock cars ass. Put tires/mods and no more stocks. Putting the same tires are like comparing the same damn car.
Brake torque that 0-60 and you will be in the 5.5 to 5.8 second range. Some reviews have gotten 5.5 out of it. Maybe this one isnt broken in it either?
Sick AWD system too. Snow, Tarmac and Gravel settings really make real world driving a lot safer.
yes this is an expensive dirt slow cart...however the evo x is a really quick car thats expensive that is really mod friendly. spend maybe 2k and you can get that bad boy at 400hp to the wheels
@pyromaniacbob This isn't expensive, its priced at about £18,000 BRAND NEW. Used will cost slightly less. And in real life you don't need a car that does above 120mph. Honestly.
maybe in the UK, but in Texas it costs around 25k, and the base GSR Evo costs 34k. For the performance differences I'd go evo. And its not about hitting 120mph since I know you cant really do that in the UK with all their city roads :). But its more of how fast you get to 120 mph!
@TheHusky9 tho that is true, i think everyone would rather drive a ralliart than a chevy astro van or something. regardless of the fact they both can do over 90 mph
the wrx sti has a 0-60 of 4.4 seconds and is in the same price range. Subaru makes some of the best rally cars now, and it reflects their street performance as well.
There are alot of cars that you can buy used for cheap and make faster then these cars. For stock they are pretty quick. Even more fun in the snow.. lol
I wasn't talking about a neon or a civic. I never said the IS want reliable it has a 2jz in it. I know its reliable. There are other others forgotten or not to be spoken of. Also yes a r34 is about that price but i will be that isn't for one registered in the us.. Most registered ones I have seen are anywhere from 64k up to 84k..
The skyline R35 is 80 grand, upon its release the older models price was literally cut in half. 0-60 in 3.2 for the same price as the gtr34, why would it retain that 80k value?
Btw the gtr34 isn't an american car, it must be assembled after buying parts out of Japan, therefore the producer can charge whatever he wants as it's nearly impossible to get the car yourself.
The ralliart is weak is heavy and under powered. people can talk all they want but as an example a 09 cobalt ss is better in every way. the ralliart is awd and is still slow as molasses. the cobalt even is faster 0-60 now thats sad. As for the quarter mile the cobalt is in a whole another league. My good friend has an 09 ralliart so i know it is a cheesy and WAY overrated
Actually, the best 0-60 numbers I could find for both cars is 5.6 seconds 0-60 for the Cobalt and 5.3 0-60 for the Ralliart, the main problem with the ralliart is the tires, a few sites swapped the stock Yokohama tires for some stickier rubber and it scored a .90g on the skid pad and beat the 09' WRX. Not to mention you have to seriously brake torque the Ralliart for those 0-60 numbers, but that not a big deal.
I will bet a old srt4 aka neon body one would put up a fight against a new ss. Not in the corners but in the straights. I will bet even the caliber srt4 would be right there. New caliber srt4 dynos almost as much whp as they are rated at...
haha lookat those saaad skidpad numbers. anyway, this car in western canada costs 35k, with 5k for the tech package which includes the recaros. 40k....10k more and you got yourself a nissan 370Z. Nobody's gona buy this piece.
11K-20K please tell me where cuz at the dealers here in Fort Myers Florida where i live its 33K-34K sticker price for a Lancer Ralliart if they are going for 20K where you are thats awesome what state are you from? if its not too long of a drive from Florida i mite go there to get one for 20K lol
the price range in California is 11k-being used -20k being brand new or with few miles but with 33k dont you think people would rather buy a evo? and if you click more info- it tells you about the starting price
i know bro but i dont make the prices 33K is what the dealer is asking for a Lancer ralliart here in Fort Myers Florida 40+K is for Evo the base Lancer is cheap but for some reason they are way over charging here for the Ralliart
they launched from idle from the looks of it. road & track got a 0-60 in 5.3 and 14.2ish @ 97mph with slight powerbraking. nice car, and wouldnt mind havin one, but for the money, id take a turbocharged cobalt ss (seen one do a 13.7 stock@103mph), and pocket a few thousand dollars id save for performance parts :P
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
this ralliart is tubocharged at 240hp
my 2004 ralliart the same amouth of boost is running 385hp this new shit coming out is dum and they should of left the evo at the 9 and not fuck up like thay did with the 10
The 09 Ralliart STOCK is 240, the 2004 Ralliart STOCK is 162. I think it is dumb that they underpowered it for almost as much as a 09 EVO. BUT it is still a sexy car, plus it is just as fun. I think it just depends on how you look at it. I know more people like the older Evos, I know I did, but I like the new designs.
It actually came in pretty close to it's competitors, I think the only car that beat it is the MazdaSpeed3, and it's was due to power mostly. 1. Price isn't bad when comparing it to a actual Evo. 2. It's heavy but worth the weight. 3. Underpowered was the goal, (Releasing a car with almost evo specs for less cost). 4. With paddle shifters and a sports shifter its just the performance of a manual just easier.
1. Of course it's cheap compared to the EVO..but to it's FASTER competitors..it's overpriced. 2. It is a COW. 3. Then make the EVO faster...the goal is to be comprable to its competitors..and it's not even close...even round a track. 4. Paddle shifters are FOR PUSSIES that dream of going fast. You can dress shit up all you want and say it performs just as well..but it's still shit. STANDARD SHIFT > AUTO
This car is aweful when compared to ALL of it's competitors. This car is 1. Overpriced. 2. Overweight. 3. Underpowered. 4. AUTO-FUCKING-MATIC...how the hell could they make THIS car without even the OPTION of a manual...Horrible move by Mitsu...09 WRX > 09 Lancer Ralliart by a long shot. This is the car that DSMers have been waiting for for YEARS and they screwed it up this bad?!?!
It actually came in pretty close to it's competitors, I think the only car that beat it is the MazdaSpeed3, and it's was due to power mostly. 1. Price isn't bad when comparing it to a actual Evo. 2. It's heavy but worth the weight. 3. Underpowered was the goal, (Releasing a car with almost evo specs for less cost). 4. With paddle shifters and a sports shifter its just the performance of a manual just easier.
Dude, old Ralliarts were a lot worse than this. Nobody was expecting this, nobody was anticipating. What showed up was a surprise to the motoring world. We were expecting another boring, non-turbo, FWD lancer ralliart. This is quite a step up, and its a hell of a lot of fun to drive im sure.
For the price they want for it they better make it more impresssive than the old one. And it would be impossible for this car to be any fun to drive because it's automatic...and that pretty much sucks every possible drop of fun out of a car so...it's still pretty much useless. Way to fuck up, mitsubishi. I truely hope they make a manual transmission version for it's second year once they realize their mistake.
I dont like driving manuals cause I sit in stop and go traffic a lot. Automatics just make life easier, and this auto can shift faster than anyone with a manual could so from a performane perspective I fail to see your point.
Well find a different route and avoid traffic or something or just have a daily driver to do your traffic driving and THEN have a nice sportier car. But for a sports car..Automatic is just garbage..I don't care if it's unbelievable faster..it's still automatic. Even the newer Ferrari's are garbage in my mind due to their stupid "flappy paddle" gear box. BRING BACK THE STICK!!
not a bad car in they wanted like 20 grand for it but what like 27-28 ya right i bought my mazdaspeed 3 new for 22 grand and it'll do laps around this thing
Yeah, but you can fix that. I could probably see wearing those tires out and then sticking a set of winter tires on those rims, then buying a better set of rims for better summer tires. The four wheel drive and HID headlights would be amazing for winter.
Man, lemme just say somthing. Mitsubishi is 1 of my favorite automobile, 1 of my dream cars is a 06 evo mr. but i mean subaru brought out the 09 impreza wrx thats pulling 0-60 in under 5 seconds with a 13.8 13.9 quarter mile time. mitsubishi needs to step it up give us somthing lighter and faster like the old lancer's even though they werent any faster then this ralliart but i mean its practicly 09 shit my 07 3.5 altima can KILL this lancer and nearly take out a new evo. i am disapointed
wow. 1st of all. Im 20. I dont know what daddys car ur driving but in south florida we drive hondas, civics, evos and subis. Most of us have 300 plus. And i doubt any car ur dad bought u is gonna keep up with ours. And damn straight im getting da new wrx. And in a couple of months it will have 300 plus like all my other projects. To tell the truth just to shut u the fuck up ill let my girl race u in her rsx for pinks. But knowing ur soft lil ass u wud back out
Also shut the fuck up. 300Horse Power (I assume that's what you mean) is fucking garbage for a project car. Sorry to say it but you probably talk a lot of shit and can't back it up. So shut your fucking mouth retard.
300 whp is faster than what u have lil boy. Idiot drive more than that on the streets and see if you dont fuck ur shit up. We run 12s high 11s all day. When i go to the track next time you can see for yourself. Lets hear or see what you have. Post a link and ill post a link to our cars on car domain. our cars are so crappy that we win HIN in orlando and miami almost every year. HAHAHAHA. Let me guess you show off ur uber cool skateboard right. HAHAHAHA
not really they cant compare a higher displacement engine to the smaller version which is turboed then use that to average the price. 2009 WRX ftw. Im gonna get one a sell my rsx
4b11 is a great block not quite the 4g63 but mad potential and will be an aftermarket favorite just like the 4g63's near bulletproof legacy a cheap and potential evo with some good mods and a tune. i will say ya cant beat subi's boxer sound
No I see Bugatti Veyrons, Ferrari's and Lambo's. Sorry Honda's are not the fastest cars in the world. Honda's are "Rice". I will say some look nice but most are ugly pieces of shit.
LOL! The 2008 WRX was considered soft (the 2009 WRX will spank it), yet it's still faster than the Lancer Ralliart. Perhaps the Lancer Ralliart is a bit too heavy......
hah wow comparing a ralliart to A wrx is like comparing a apples to oranges... the wrx is all wheel drive the ralliart is not. the wrx is turbo charged the ralliart is not.
Totally wrong. The Lancer Ralliart is AWD and is F/I. How would a 2.0 liter I4 engine produce 237hp? With F/I of course, just like the WRX. Only Honda can make the most power from N/A engines. And the reason Mitsubishi made a Ralliart Lancer is to compete it against the WRX. Next time, please do not comment with false information.
its ok, the bad thing is if they wanna compete with the civic si and the wrx (not sti) they need to bring the price down to match those cars. the performcance is about right for the mid level mitsu ralliart, but the pricing is not much lower than the evo x, it has to be WELLLL UNDER 30k not just barely under it. they could have put the manual they put in the gsr evo tro save more money on production instead of the twin clutch which is faster to shift than a manual but it is more expensive.
hahahahahah!!!! thats a joke man!!! dude, my 07 civic si FG2 can do 0-60 in 6.5 and 6.2 secs....and high 14's any day....68.5mph on the slalom......wow!!!! that car is a joke...250hp? hahahahah!!!! sorry mitsu.....not this time!!
right.....a civic.....$21k compare to about $30k for the lancer rally......i work for long beach mitsubishi man.....i know those cars up and down!!! 5 years doing the same shit man!!! thats why i drive a civic si.....
LEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR%uFEFF LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY BECAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS
i feel you. Im trying to get my hands on an 2006 sti but cant find one. I still think mitsubishi sold out too. The old body is so much better but maybe you pay less insurance on the family lookin evo
i heard somewhere the current (and still incredibly ugly) WRX is getting a huge increase in power. is this true? it was somewhere in the 260-270 hp range, which would mean Mitsu will have to back to the drawing board with this lancer ralliart. we need another test, InsideLine! :P
yeah, well seeing as you're the one who thumbed me down I guess you wouldn't, you didn't really try too hard did you? Just kinda gave up after one or two clicks and decided to minus me and leave a comment like that. At the end of its brake test it squeels, its loud and if you click continually it sounds funny. Thank you for allowing me to baby step your way out of this situation. And yes I am my own special kind of asshole, one that gets things immediately.
It seems strange that they make this package so people don't have to pay for the pricer evo, yet the evo is already rather cheap for a really good sports car.
It's a good but not great car Mitsubishi needs to adjust it better and add a manual transmission because it'll be left in the dust if Mitsubishi doesn't step it up against the Subaru WRX but then again the new WRX is ugly unless it's hooked with a body kit.
I'm not a fan of the fenders on the Evo X, so the RalliArt will save me money and allow me to do modifications where I see fit. New tires will be the first upgrade.
MERGATROYDER 6 months ago
Run a set of Mazdaspeed 3 tires on those rims and watch the braking and handling numbers improve significantly. They didn't want the RA to be too close to the Evo on purpose... hence the garbage tires.
CaptObvious75 11 months ago
Man I'm sick of ppl hating on Ralliart. Most of them have no idea what it's capable of. And a lot of people who have Evos can't drive them legally bc their license was taken away for racing or they don't meet the laws in the state bc they are overtuned in some states for the roads. Ie: if you bought one in California you'd have to have the thing de-tuned. I just want to be able to go fast when I need/want to, I don't need a racecar.
Ra11iArt 11 months ago
@Ra11iArt All cars are capable of much more. I barely spent $200 for a tactrix, and got it tuned to make 40/40+ hp/tq on a single 93 tune
jecht86 7 months ago
Guys, Search Proton Inspira On Youtube Or Google.
salazrylhacker 1 year ago
Wow, this thing isn't good at...anything!
ambientflier 1 year ago
man the specs and performance figures for this car are horrible, I expected it to be much much better! a great disappointment and clear no match for Mazda Mazdaspeed3 which I thought it would be. 60 - 0 in 128ft!!! my moms heavy ass Acura MDX will do better than that!
MrPreludeTurbo 1 year ago
@MrPreludeTurbo IL is known for having mediocre test numbers. I know the Ralliart isn't blindingly fast, but I almost choked when I saw 6.6s to 60.
PantstofryPWNZ 5 months ago
The 0-60 is about 5 to 6 seconds depending on the driver/tires/mods.
The WRX doesn't destroy it, fanboys. Put the same tires on both and they are close in all areas. WRX slightly wins some and Ralliart slightly wins some.
There is almost no turbo lag to begin with and brake torques are like child abuse to the car.
gongometube 2 years ago
It only depends on the driver since we are talking about stock cars ass. Put tires/mods and no more stocks. Putting the same tires are like comparing the same damn car.
HatenSuffering 2 years ago
the 0-60 had a seriously weak start
ProjectRevoLutioN21 2 years ago
nice car
2010bigman 2 years ago
Brake torque that 0-60 and you will be in the 5.5 to 5.8 second range. Some reviews have gotten 5.5 out of it. Maybe this one isnt broken in it either?
Sick AWD system too. Snow, Tarmac and Gravel settings really make real world driving a lot safer.
CaptObvious75 2 years ago
Why didnt they spool the turbo up on the brake before their 0-60 run? Other reviews I have read have chopped a half second off the time doing that.
rohonky 2 years ago
yes this is an expensive dirt slow cart...however the evo x is a really quick car thats expensive that is really mod friendly. spend maybe 2k and you can get that bad boy at 400hp to the wheels
pyromaniacbob 2 years ago
@pyromaniacbob This isn't expensive, its priced at about £18,000 BRAND NEW. Used will cost slightly less. And in real life you don't need a car that does above 120mph. Honestly.
TheHusky9 2 years ago
maybe in the UK, but in Texas it costs around 25k, and the base GSR Evo costs 34k. For the performance differences I'd go evo. And its not about hitting 120mph since I know you cant really do that in the UK with all their city roads :). But its more of how fast you get to 120 mph!
pyromaniacbob 2 years ago
@TheHusky9 tho that is true, i think everyone would rather drive a ralliart than a chevy astro van or something. regardless of the fact they both can do over 90 mph
hungryhhippo 1 year ago
I know this competes with the wrx (Which destroys it) but im wondering how does this compare to the 2.5gt? Since there both auto that is
Karnage542 2 years ago
holy smokes thats slow.
I knew there was a reason I wasn't interested in this model.
allteeth 2 years ago
Thing is straight trash.. go back to the Evo 9
TEFLONTHADON 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
junk
rmm2424 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yup Mitsushitty is junk, buy a Subaru Wrx or a Sti.
fattygetsowned 2 years ago
im getting a car soon and im trying to deside should i get the lancer eather rallyart or gts , or the subaru wrx ?
cmala100 2 years ago
Lancer.... Lancer all the way.... GTS or Ralliart, that's your choice.
rsaettone234 2 years ago
cnt afford the ralliart inless its got noth on it so might get the gts w/ everything on it :)
cmala100 2 years ago
none of them, they are both shit and slow!
carfy06 2 years ago
then what should i get i want it to look cool and go fast for cheap $
and anyways u can always trick a car out and its hard to deside w/ all the diff styles and makes
cmala100 2 years ago
This is what you have to do. Get off your chair and goto Subaru & Mitsubishi.
Drive:
Lancer
Lancer Ralliart
Subaru Impreza WRX
Subaru Impreza WRX STI
Then decide. It's a feel. You have to like the feel of the car. Trust me.
fooruggler 2 years ago 8
@fooruggler thats what i did! i love my Ralliart.
Danglyparts12 1 year ago
@fooruggler if you drive STI you have to drive EVO...
DrouQC 1 year ago
@fooruggler Well if you're going to drive the STI then dump the Lancer and drive an Evo.
gumper1986 1 year ago
@fooruggler That ain't comparing right. It's like this:
Lancer -- Impreza
Ralliart -- WRX
Evo --- STI
PantstofryPWNZ 5 months ago
lancer man
pimpstyle100 2 years ago
@cmala100 please tell me you got the wrx
theguythatcould 1 year ago
the wrx sti has a 0-60 of 4.4 seconds and is in the same price range. Subaru makes some of the best rally cars now, and it reflects their street performance as well.
chris5302 2 years ago
how is a 35,000 dollar car in the same price range as a 26,000 dollar car? The evo competes against the sti. This competes against the wrx.
badassxr50r 2 years ago
Then i'll go buy a 2003 IS300 for 15000, turbocharge it among other upgrades, and save 5 grand?
chris5302 2 years ago
There are alot of cars that you can buy used for cheap and make faster then these cars. For stock they are pretty quick. Even more fun in the snow.. lol
badassxr50r 2 years ago
I'm not talking about a dodge neon or a honda civic, the IS300 is one of the most reliable cars on the market.
Don't forget that the 2000 nissan skyline r34 is also similarly priced, and is also awd.
chris5302 2 years ago
I wasn't talking about a neon or a civic. I never said the IS want reliable it has a 2jz in it. I know its reliable. There are other others forgotten or not to be spoken of. Also yes a r34 is about that price but i will be that isn't for one registered in the us.. Most registered ones I have seen are anywhere from 64k up to 84k..
badassxr50r 2 years ago
The skyline R35 is 80 grand, upon its release the older models price was literally cut in half. 0-60 in 3.2 for the same price as the gtr34, why would it retain that 80k value?
Btw the gtr34 isn't an american car, it must be assembled after buying parts out of Japan, therefore the producer can charge whatever he wants as it's nearly impossible to get the car yourself.
chris5302 2 years ago
Comment removed
fattygetsowned 2 years ago
uhhh. subaru wrx sti, nuff said.
chris5302 2 years ago
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, nuff said, see what I did there?
Nagidar23 2 years ago
Comment removed
raymondandanne 2 years ago
The ralliart is weak is heavy and under powered. people can talk all they want but as an example a 09 cobalt ss is better in every way. the ralliart is awd and is still slow as molasses. the cobalt even is faster 0-60 now thats sad. As for the quarter mile the cobalt is in a whole another league. My good friend has an 09 ralliart so i know it is a cheesy and WAY overrated
snowboarder2255 2 years ago
as long as its AWD...im all good =)
kongbingyuan931202 2 years ago
Actually, the best 0-60 numbers I could find for both cars is 5.6 seconds 0-60 for the Cobalt and 5.3 0-60 for the Ralliart, the main problem with the ralliart is the tires, a few sites swapped the stock Yokohama tires for some stickier rubber and it scored a .90g on the skid pad and beat the 09' WRX. Not to mention you have to seriously brake torque the Ralliart for those 0-60 numbers, but that not a big deal.
Nagidar23 2 years ago
umm the ralliart is a cross car not a super tuner like the Evo.. the cobalt SS is a beast but the ss is out of the ralli's league..
i think of the SS as the new Srt4's
Danglyparts12 2 years ago
The srt4 is a close race between the supercharged ss's but is no contest to the new turboed ones.
snowboarder2255 2 years ago
I will bet a old srt4 aka neon body one would put up a fight against a new ss. Not in the corners but in the straights. I will bet even the caliber srt4 would be right there. New caliber srt4 dynos almost as much whp as they are rated at...
badassxr50r 2 years ago
haha lookat those saaad skidpad numbers. anyway, this car in western canada costs 35k, with 5k for the tech package which includes the recaros. 40k....10k more and you got yourself a nissan 370Z. Nobody's gona buy this piece.
MamboItalian5 2 years ago
yeah you can get something much nicer for the money.
MvP1292 2 years ago
They seem so nice, but I bet a bigger turbo upgrade and that ralliart will smoke some by standers lol.
smiley00341 2 years ago
i beat the new rally art in my stock cobalt ss
josephayal 2 years ago
So.... Try autocross.
killercrx91 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
Jazket 2 years ago
i bet you will lose and cry like a baby when it comes to autocross
kongbingyuan931202 2 years ago
ryan is a lazy phatass.
mother mother fuck , mother mother phuck, phuck, mother phuck, mother phuck
nose noise noise
121234 ,noise noise noise
smoothvanillajoshy 2 years ago
nice car but way overpriced at 33K+
twyztted 3 years ago
Comment removed
AzNSOUJAai 2 years ago
their price range is around 11k-20k tops
the evolution models are 33k+
AzNSOUJAai 2 years ago
11K-20K please tell me where cuz at the dealers here in Fort Myers Florida where i live its 33K-34K sticker price for a Lancer Ralliart if they are going for 20K where you are thats awesome what state are you from? if its not too long of a drive from Florida i mite go there to get one for 20K lol
twyztted 2 years ago
I bought a Ralliart for $23K (brand new 9 miles). Go to South Holland Mitsubishi in Chicago.
rayschiro 2 years ago
the price range in California is 11k-being used -20k being brand new or with few miles but with 33k dont you think people would rather buy a evo? and if you click more info- it tells you about the starting price
AzNSOUJAai 2 years ago
i know bro but i dont make the prices 33K is what the dealer is asking for a Lancer ralliart here in Fort Myers Florida 40+K is for Evo the base Lancer is cheap but for some reason they are way over charging here for the Ralliart
twyztted 2 years ago
they launched from idle from the looks of it. road & track got a 0-60 in 5.3 and 14.2ish @ 97mph with slight powerbraking. nice car, and wouldnt mind havin one, but for the money, id take a turbocharged cobalt ss (seen one do a 13.7 stock@103mph), and pocket a few thousand dollars id save for performance parts :P
bmw7891 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this ralliart is tubocharged at 240hp
my 2004 ralliart the same amouth of boost is running 385hp this new shit coming out is dum and they should of left the evo at the 9 and not fuck up like thay did with the 10
eurogino6t9 3 years ago
The 09 Ralliart STOCK is 240, the 2004 Ralliart STOCK is 162. I think it is dumb that they underpowered it for almost as much as a 09 EVO. BUT it is still a sexy car, plus it is just as fun. I think it just depends on how you look at it. I know more people like the older Evos, I know I did, but I like the new designs.
Comotosed13 3 years ago 2
What the hell? Awful launch, but I guess that it's because of the stupid paddle shifter. 0-60 time and 1/4 mile time were a lot worse than the WRX.
But it looks like the Ralliart is faster from 80MPH+.
Atheismrulez 3 years ago
no launch?
LiLTMac123 3 years ago
new wrx will do low 5s at best and i was talking about the 08
gengiz 3 years ago
It actually came in pretty close to it's competitors, I think the only car that beat it is the MazdaSpeed3, and it's was due to power mostly. 1. Price isn't bad when comparing it to a actual Evo. 2. It's heavy but worth the weight. 3. Underpowered was the goal, (Releasing a car with almost evo specs for less cost). 4. With paddle shifters and a sports shifter its just the performance of a manual just easier.
Comotosed13 3 years ago
1. Of course it's cheap compared to the EVO..but to it's FASTER competitors..it's overpriced. 2. It is a COW. 3. Then make the EVO faster...the goal is to be comprable to its competitors..and it's not even close...even round a track. 4. Paddle shifters are FOR PUSSIES that dream of going fast. You can dress shit up all you want and say it performs just as well..but it's still shit. STANDARD SHIFT > AUTO
idiotfieldmouse 3 years ago
This car is aweful when compared to ALL of it's competitors. This car is 1. Overpriced. 2. Overweight. 3. Underpowered. 4. AUTO-FUCKING-MATIC...how the hell could they make THIS car without even the OPTION of a manual...Horrible move by Mitsu...09 WRX > 09 Lancer Ralliart by a long shot. This is the car that DSMers have been waiting for for YEARS and they screwed it up this bad?!?!
idiotfieldmouse 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It actually came in pretty close to it's competitors, I think the only car that beat it is the MazdaSpeed3, and it's was due to power mostly. 1. Price isn't bad when comparing it to a actual Evo. 2. It's heavy but worth the weight. 3. Underpowered was the goal, (Releasing a car with almost evo specs for less cost). 4. With paddle shifters and a sports shifter its just the performance of a manual just easier.
Comotosed13 3 years ago
Dude, old Ralliarts were a lot worse than this. Nobody was expecting this, nobody was anticipating. What showed up was a surprise to the motoring world. We were expecting another boring, non-turbo, FWD lancer ralliart. This is quite a step up, and its a hell of a lot of fun to drive im sure.
blackXSpr 3 years ago
For the price they want for it they better make it more impresssive than the old one. And it would be impossible for this car to be any fun to drive because it's automatic...and that pretty much sucks every possible drop of fun out of a car so...it's still pretty much useless. Way to fuck up, mitsubishi. I truely hope they make a manual transmission version for it's second year once they realize their mistake.
idiotfieldmouse 3 years ago
I dont like driving manuals cause I sit in stop and go traffic a lot. Automatics just make life easier, and this auto can shift faster than anyone with a manual could so from a performane perspective I fail to see your point.
blackXSpr 3 years ago 2
Well find a different route and avoid traffic or something or just have a daily driver to do your traffic driving and THEN have a nice sportier car. But for a sports car..Automatic is just garbage..I don't care if it's unbelievable faster..it's still automatic. Even the newer Ferrari's are garbage in my mind due to their stupid "flappy paddle" gear box. BRING BACK THE STICK!!
idiotfieldmouse 3 years ago
lmfao sry i cant afford a daily driver AND a sports car haha funny tho
blackXSpr 3 years ago
So I hear the Lancer has bad turbo lag
What's the most money efficient way to get rid of it?
MattATTACK0 3 years ago
Question: can you put a bigger engine and turbo so it rolls like an Evo?
CptKenChen 3 years ago
ya actually it does lol and i can fit there luggage in the back
02stang951 3 years ago
not a bad car in they wanted like 20 grand for it but what like 27-28 ya right i bought my mazdaspeed 3 new for 22 grand and it'll do laps around this thing
02stang951 3 years ago
Yeah but your car probably won't fit 5 people comfortably like the Ralliart would. Lol.
shadowstewie 3 years ago
AT ot MT?
molerpollo 3 years ago
AT? ST? X(
molerpollo 3 years ago
remember this is not an evo dude. but still has smaller turbo.
mazda6tuner99 3 years ago
Yeah, but you can fix that. I could probably see wearing those tires out and then sticking a set of winter tires on those rims, then buying a better set of rims for better summer tires. The four wheel drive and HID headlights would be amazing for winter.
quuaa1 3 years ago
Man, lemme just say somthing. Mitsubishi is 1 of my favorite automobile, 1 of my dream cars is a 06 evo mr. but i mean subaru brought out the 09 impreza wrx thats pulling 0-60 in under 5 seconds with a 13.8 13.9 quarter mile time. mitsubishi needs to step it up give us somthing lighter and faster like the old lancer's even though they werent any faster then this ralliart but i mean its practicly 09 shit my 07 3.5 altima can KILL this lancer and nearly take out a new evo. i am disapointed
vinnieg2831 3 years ago
errr wrong where does a wrx do 0-60 in under 5 secs and the 0-400mtr in 13 sumthing ,your dreaming julio
gengiz 3 years ago
Try Car&Driver.
striketalonx 3 years ago
^ In response to "gengiz"
striketalonx 3 years ago
very beautiful the new lancer and strong
can somebody help my with his price in europe?
thanks
almant2 3 years ago
ok ...ftw? lmao? B4.? who's the little text'r and i quote "Im gonna get one a sell my rsx" what does that mean? how old are we?... done.....
MethodRacing 3 years ago
wow. 1st of all. Im 20. I dont know what daddys car ur driving but in south florida we drive hondas, civics, evos and subis. Most of us have 300 plus. And i doubt any car ur dad bought u is gonna keep up with ours. And damn straight im getting da new wrx. And in a couple of months it will have 300 plus like all my other projects. To tell the truth just to shut u the fuck up ill let my girl race u in her rsx for pinks. But knowing ur soft lil ass u wud back out
yardman8888 3 years ago
Also shut the fuck up. 300Horse Power (I assume that's what you mean) is fucking garbage for a project car. Sorry to say it but you probably talk a lot of shit and can't back it up. So shut your fucking mouth retard.
skater4life101101 3 years ago
300 whp is faster than what u have lil boy. Idiot drive more than that on the streets and see if you dont fuck ur shit up. We run 12s high 11s all day. When i go to the track next time you can see for yourself. Lets hear or see what you have. Post a link and ill post a link to our cars on car domain. our cars are so crappy that we win HIN in orlando and miami almost every year. HAHAHAHA. Let me guess you show off ur uber cool skateboard right. HAHAHAHA
yardman8888 3 years ago
just click on Methodracing, those are our cars thanks for playing
MethodRacing 3 years ago
The new mitsubishi lancer is so beatyfull, i like it :D
pureownall 3 years ago
i miss the old EVO's
ibanezguitarist54 3 years ago
not bad a steal for the price
MethodRacing 3 years ago
not really they cant compare a higher displacement engine to the smaller version which is turboed then use that to average the price. 2009 WRX ftw. Im gonna get one a sell my rsx
yardman8888 3 years ago
4b11 is a great block not quite the 4g63 but mad potential and will be an aftermarket favorite just like the 4g63's near bulletproof legacy a cheap and potential evo with some good mods and a tune. i will say ya cant beat subi's boxer sound
MethodRacing 3 years ago
hahahahaha. yeah you and half the honda population is going to sell thiers and get this. or better yet "i'm gonna turbo it"...yeah. never happens.
bermbuster49 3 years ago
and to ur retarded ass. Most of us do in fact turbo our engines. Even if we build our own custom turbos. and we are damn well good at it
yardman8888 3 years ago
1 more thing. Most of the "Honda population" do in fact have the fastest cars. Go to any car shows and what do u see. HONDAS BITCH
yardman8888 3 years ago
No I see Bugatti Veyrons, Ferrari's and Lambo's. Sorry Honda's are not the fastest cars in the world. Honda's are "Rice". I will say some look nice but most are ugly pieces of shit.
skater4life101101 3 years ago
because thats the cheapest one, you could get...
swapped a stolen motor and you are good to go.... vtec YO!
dannynacif 3 years ago
put up or shut up. tired of talking to yall ignorant ppl
yardman8888 3 years ago
put up or shut up what?
i dont mind ppl blabering nonsense...
it makes my day hahah
dannynacif 3 years ago
lol
yardman8888 3 years ago
vtec............word!!!!!!
07SiPOWER 3 years ago
6.6 lol, the 09 wrx will eat this
LiLTMac123 3 years ago
ugly
123adrianramirez 3 years ago
vaya mierda de coche,estropearon la saga
pilu2008 3 years ago
LOL! The 2008 WRX was considered soft (the 2009 WRX will spank it), yet it's still faster than the Lancer Ralliart. Perhaps the Lancer Ralliart is a bit too heavy......
AWDfreak 3 years ago
hah wow comparing a ralliart to A wrx is like comparing a apples to oranges... the wrx is all wheel drive the ralliart is not. the wrx is turbo charged the ralliart is not.
VR4RubenVR4 3 years ago
Totally wrong. The Lancer Ralliart is AWD and is F/I. How would a 2.0 liter I4 engine produce 237hp? With F/I of course, just like the WRX. Only Honda can make the most power from N/A engines. And the reason Mitsubishi made a Ralliart Lancer is to compete it against the WRX. Next time, please do not comment with false information.
VemacRD350 3 years ago
dum shit the ralliart IS AWD, maybe you should do some research before you post
Ev0Mrr 3 years ago
AND its tueboed and intercooled.. dude where do you get your info
Ev0Mrr 3 years ago
little boy. Read the info section b4 u start talking. And u do some research. lmao. dont feel dumb when u find out im right
yardman8888 3 years ago
im sorry, who are you talking to?
MethodRacing 3 years ago
junk
rmm2424 3 years ago 2
its ok, the bad thing is if they wanna compete with the civic si and the wrx (not sti) they need to bring the price down to match those cars. the performcance is about right for the mid level mitsu ralliart, but the pricing is not much lower than the evo x, it has to be WELLLL UNDER 30k not just barely under it. they could have put the manual they put in the gsr evo tro save more money on production instead of the twin clutch which is faster to shift than a manual but it is more expensive.
shabbadooba 3 years ago
They need offer the car in a m/t and try and drop some more weight/add more power to it...
dblackviper2k3 3 years ago
mitsubishi's always seemed to breakdown on me.
slimbothetiger 3 years ago
My Galant has been the most reliable vehicle I have owned, it's treated me better than my past two Accords, two Camrys and Subaru Legacy.
ohgrfreak 3 years ago
different strokes for different folks.
slimbothetiger 3 years ago
hahahahahah!!!! thats a joke man!!! dude, my 07 civic si FG2 can do 0-60 in 6.5 and 6.2 secs....and high 14's any day....68.5mph on the slalom......wow!!!! that car is a joke...250hp? hahahahah!!!! sorry mitsu.....not this time!!
07SiPOWER 3 years ago
No matter how fast it is, it's still a civic.
sihfi 3 years ago
right.....a civic.....$21k compare to about $30k for the lancer rally......i work for long beach mitsubishi man.....i know those cars up and down!!! 5 years doing the same shit man!!! thats why i drive a civic si.....
07SiPOWER 3 years ago
dude that car isnt a drag car..it's made for rally and it would own your civic si
alex18alex 3 years ago
haha i wouldnt use the si or a lancer thats not a evo for a rally
VR4RubenVR4 3 years ago
the Sub WRX is better.. check the video
HazeGreyAndUnderway 3 years ago
that was nice!
doktormile 3 years ago
why can't they put a manual gear box in the car .......look how slow the car is off the line ... and a manual box will be much more fun
zYzmrZIzYz 3 years ago
there is a manual mode in this car, there's a twin-clutch tiptronic transmission
alex18alex 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
KatinaNewsBroadcast 3 years ago
I like the Mitsubishi Lancer,it's not a bad car!!
LuxuryAndExotics 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
post this after you read it
something good will happen at 2:25 tomorrow
get ready for the biggest shock in your life.
whoever breaks this chain will be cursed w/ relationship problems 4-10 year
if you post this on 5 vids in 15 mins, your safe.
peacemaker9080 3 years ago
MT FTW!!!!1
Hiroyuki456 3 years ago
and why the fuck they are testing an Automatic transmition car? not fair
zueq 3 years ago
this seemed a bit shit tbh, o well, save up for a GT-R i guess hahaha
Janeshcw 3 years ago
i would buy it, turbo charge it, after market exhaust, and CAI, its a good combo
mazda6tuner99 3 years ago
its already turboed my friend. Buy an rsx or civic si and turbo it for the same price as buying a brand new ralliart POS
yardman8888 3 years ago
what? i thought it was like v6 or somethin. i thought the evo was the only one that got the turbo? oh well
mazda6tuner99 3 years ago
this car sucks i would better buy a civic or a cvhevy 572 and put in my jeep
maxnanabas09 3 years ago
menuda mierda de prestaciones
diosfenix 3 years ago
WEAK SAUCE
JayBrizzle 3 years ago
definetly would get a wrx hatch instead. Much more hp for less
yardman8888 3 years ago
No shit, and for 27,000 like they list, you could buy a used 04-06 Sti for that much thats in mint condition.
1987EvanB 3 years ago
Yeah, except the Lancer doesn't look like crap. I was a fan of the WRX and STI, but what Subaru did to that car is unforgivable. It looks neutered.
youtubasoarus 3 years ago
i feel you. Im trying to get my hands on an 2006 sti but cant find one. I still think mitsubishi sold out too. The old body is so much better but maybe you pay less insurance on the family lookin evo
yardman8888 3 years ago
el mejor mitsubishi
monterofmx 3 years ago
i heard somewhere the current (and still incredibly ugly) WRX is getting a huge increase in power. is this true? it was somewhere in the 260-270 hp range, which would mean Mitsu will have to back to the drawing board with this lancer ralliart. we need another test, InsideLine! :P
onoitsaWRX 3 years ago
subaru wrx gt
inhuman216 3 years ago
im gonna stick with my 06...
car852 3 years ago
Edmunds RoX
madwolfq8 3 years ago
Thanks Edmunds, for another informative, concise video.
It's nice to have unbiased review.
Keep it up!
ShortySIG552 3 years ago
boy did they exaggerate the numbers in the magazines woo.
chrisw40 3 years ago
it needs wider, stickier tires to up those stats... those sets is the same with the base Lancer
HotSIzZle12 3 years ago
turn your speakers up and continually click at 00:43
almightyfargoth 3 years ago
i dont get it
dracolnyte 3 years ago
yeah, well seeing as you're the one who thumbed me down I guess you wouldn't, you didn't really try too hard did you? Just kinda gave up after one or two clicks and decided to minus me and leave a comment like that. At the end of its brake test it squeels, its loud and if you click continually it sounds funny. Thank you for allowing me to baby step your way out of this situation. And yes I am my own special kind of asshole, one that gets things immediately.
almightyfargoth 3 years ago
i dont even see a thumbs down beside your name...
dracolnyte 3 years ago
then go to the comments page, listen if it wasn't you then w/e, its hardly a punishable offense. I just thought people would get what I was showing.
almightyfargoth 3 years ago
disappointing stats
Maserati7200 3 years ago 2
+1.
The curb weight is ridiculous.
The HHR SS has a better skidpad number than that!
ShortySIG552 3 years ago
nice car²!
tiagox2007z 3 years ago
cool
matrixman6 3 years ago
kool
g465777 3 years ago
meh. i'm not terribly impressed with its performance specs. it's good, but not amazing. i think that the 2009 wrx will top the ralliart.
sdijnfpo0jaisf 3 years ago
It seems strange that they make this package so people don't have to pay for the pricer evo, yet the evo is already rather cheap for a really good sports car.
stevz0r 3 years ago
It's a good but not great car Mitsubishi needs to adjust it better and add a manual transmission because it'll be left in the dust if Mitsubishi doesn't step it up against the Subaru WRX but then again the new WRX is ugly unless it's hooked with a body kit.
jRV327 3 years ago
Nice car.
JENSSCHLAU 3 years ago
Well atleast i know what car not to get now.
seprehuoyeviglli 3 years ago 3