Unmanned STV rejection may cost some their program and job: E.g., the LAVI fighter. The 1st in aviation history flights of Stealth, Tailless 3D Vectoring [STV] with mini aero-control, stealth inlets/wing-body design took place in Israel in 1987 [May 18, 1987, Aviation Week]. Unclassified video in Facebook ["Benjamin Gal-Or"] explains sub/supersonic agility/safety gained by STV. EF, f35/f22 are not STV while unmanned NGB or ??? may be. Cf. X-44MANTA, X-47b, RQ-170, T-50, B-2.
Unmanned STV rejection may cost some their program and job: E.g., the LAVI fighter. The 1st in aviation history flights of Stealth, Tailless 3D Vectoring [STV] with mini aero-control, stealth inlets/wing-body design took place in Israel in 1987 [May 18, 1987, Aviation Week]. Unclassified video in Facebook ["Benjamin Gal-Or"] explains sub/supersonic agility/safety gained by STV. EF, f35/f22 are not STV while unmanned NGB or ??? may be. Cf. X-44MANTA, X-47b, RQ-170, T-50, B-2.
Unmanned STV rejection may cost some their program and job: E.g., the LAVI fighter. The 1st in aviation history flights of Stealth, Tailless 3D Vectoring [STV] with mini aero-control, stealth inlets/wing-body design took place in Israel in 1987 [May 18, 1987, Aviation Week]. Unclassified video in Facebook ["Benjamin Gal-Or"] explains sub/supersonic agility/safety gained by STV. EF, f35/f22 are not STV while unmanned NGB or ??? may be. Cf. X-44MANTA, X-47b, RQ-170, T-50, B-2.
It is the US soldier, not the reporter, who has given us the freedom of the press. It is the US soldier, not the poet, who has given us the freedom of speech. It is the US soldier, not the campus organizer, who gives us the freedom to demonstrate. It is the US soldier who salutes the flag, who serves beneath the flag, and whose coffin is draped by the flag, who gives the the protester the right to burn the flag
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The Romanian Traian Vuia was the first to truly take to the air,because his plane took off on its' own power,without any help.The Wright brothers' plane used a catapult,shown in the video,so it didn't take off on its' own power.
@walhalla18: Idiot, the Wright brothers' aircraft didn't use a catapult, that was its tarmac, it didn't have wheels, so it used 2 metal rails instead.
@Helge129 He is not an idiot, but he is partially correct, Traian Vuia took of with the aircraft's own power of the engine, the wright Brothers didn't! But the real truth is that the first one to TAKE OFF unassisted, with engine's power only, wasn't the romanian Traian Vuia or the Wright bros., it was a german immigrant named Gustave Weisskopf which later changed the name into Whitehead after comming in US. He did it in 1901! :) Look it up!
You americans are just upset that a german and not a "home grown" american did it! All those mentioned above deserve our respect, but so far, Weisskopf was THE FIRST, Vuia was the second.
You obviously don't know much about AMERICA! The majority of the country was made up of immigrants. We are a country of immigrants, so Weisskopf was as American as anyone else living and working here. So whether he or the Wright brothers was first, it was still an AMERICAN that did it first!!!
@keithskye YES! What a hell a hell do you think i'm saying, genious?
:)
But if Weisskopf is the first...AMERICAN...why is still ignored by...AMERICANS? Why are the Wright Bros. still considered the first? Because they are "more americans" than the german? The first and WWII are over, why is still ignored? No matter how you cut it, the Wright Bros. didn't used the own aircraft's power on board, but a counterweight catapult/slingshot! Weisskopf on the first try...0.5 mile distance, 50 feet high!
The problem is the take off, not the "Wright bros. plane flew on it's own power, bud"!
If by absurd, the Wright Bros. plane was connected with a rope by a hot air ballon, and at, let's say 500 feet high, the engine is started and the rope is cut off and the plane is "flying", the question is: how did it get there, in the air? With his own power? NO! Is the ballon! So, is the same situation with the catapult. Start from 0 speed into the air with your own engine without any other EXTERNAL help!
The airplane starts his engine, starts to gain speed, rolls, and is still on the ground, but is getting closer to the edge of the cliff, drops over the clif...and is "flying". Is this the first unassisted take off with his own power? NO!
Is understandable that Weisskopf is almost unknown to general public in Romania, but in US also? For crying outloud...
Can Small electro-magnetized missiles levitate on a Jet's wing.Wing does not touch missile at all,only magnet levitation.Small missiles will obtain there own laser energized magnetism,because of solar cells that are around the missiles,they can become energized, photo-voltaic cells and can make magnet levitation,see when laser light shines(not sun light)on the missile's solar cells.This allows so creates levitation fields.Could be hard to balance the missile levitate properties,in high g-forces.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The Wright brother's MAY not have been the first to fly. It is alleged that a NZ man flew before the W/bros with more than just staight lines but turns as well in what resembles a modern micro lite with tri-cycle.
self defense and deterrence and innovation. If not all modern conveniences were used for military purposes at one point such as: Internet, GPS navigation, 4 wheel drive vehicles and even cell phones.
Report to US congress 2007 (GAO-07-406SP on page 78):
The F22 have at least 2 structural problems:
- The F22 have cracks in the aircraft's aft boom where the horizontal tail attaches to the fuselage.
-The F22 have cracs in "titanium casting" materials near the engine.
A key reliability requirement for the F-22A is a 3-hour mean time between maintenance, but but right now the mean time between maintenance of the F22 is LESS than 1 hour! The F22 is junk, its very unreliable!
This has been flagged as spam show
Unmanned STV rejection may cost some their program and job: E.g., the LAVI fighter. The 1st in aviation history flights of Stealth, Tailless 3D Vectoring [STV] with mini aero-control, stealth inlets/wing-body design took place in Israel in 1987 [May 18, 1987, Aviation Week]. Unclassified video in Facebook ["Benjamin Gal-Or"] explains sub/supersonic agility/safety gained by STV. EF, f35/f22 are not STV while unmanned NGB or ??? may be. Cf. X-44MANTA, X-47b, RQ-170, T-50, B-2.
1Bengalor 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Unmanned STV rejection may cost some their program and job: E.g., the LAVI fighter. The 1st in aviation history flights of Stealth, Tailless 3D Vectoring [STV] with mini aero-control, stealth inlets/wing-body design took place in Israel in 1987 [May 18, 1987, Aviation Week]. Unclassified video in Facebook ["Benjamin Gal-Or"] explains sub/supersonic agility/safety gained by STV. EF, f35/f22 are not STV while unmanned NGB or ??? may be. Cf. X-44MANTA, X-47b, RQ-170, T-50, B-2.
1Bengalor 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Unmanned STV rejection may cost some their program and job: E.g., the LAVI fighter. The 1st in aviation history flights of Stealth, Tailless 3D Vectoring [STV] with mini aero-control, stealth inlets/wing-body design took place in Israel in 1987 [May 18, 1987, Aviation Week]. Unclassified video in Facebook ["Benjamin Gal-Or"] explains sub/supersonic agility/safety gained by STV. EF, f35/f22 are not STV while unmanned NGB or ??? may be. Cf. X-44MANTA, X-47b, RQ-170, T-50, B-2.
1Bengalor 1 year ago
what about the c-5 galaxy?
SILENCER514 1 year ago
Comment removed
retiredge76 2 years ago
Comment removed
retiredge76 2 years ago
i agree with freebird101st ! amen !
TANKDOGTROOPS 2 years ago
It is the US soldier, not the reporter, who has given us the freedom of the press. It is the US soldier, not the poet, who has given us the freedom of speech. It is the US soldier, not the campus organizer, who gives us the freedom to demonstrate. It is the US soldier who salutes the flag, who serves beneath the flag, and whose coffin is draped by the flag, who gives the the protester the right to burn the flag
>
>
>
Freebird101st 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Romanian Traian Vuia was the first to truly take to the air,because his plane took off on its' own power,without any help.The Wright brothers' plane used a catapult,shown in the video,so it didn't take off on its' own power.
walhalla18 3 years ago
the Wright brothers plane flew on it's own power bud. they are the first to have power flight
Dogmeat1950 2 years ago 5
your a fucking idiot and you just want your shitty country to be known for something its not.
blair91234 1 year ago
@walhalla18: Idiot, the Wright brothers' aircraft didn't use a catapult, that was its tarmac, it didn't have wheels, so it used 2 metal rails instead.
Helge129 1 year ago
@Helge129 He is not an idiot, but he is partially correct, Traian Vuia took of with the aircraft's own power of the engine, the wright Brothers didn't! But the real truth is that the first one to TAKE OFF unassisted, with engine's power only, wasn't the romanian Traian Vuia or the Wright bros., it was a german immigrant named Gustave Weisskopf which later changed the name into Whitehead after comming in US. He did it in 1901! :) Look it up!
RomaniaTricolor 1 year ago
You americans are just upset that a german and not a "home grown" american did it! All those mentioned above deserve our respect, but so far, Weisskopf was THE FIRST, Vuia was the second.
RomaniaTricolor 1 year ago
@RomaniaTricolor
You obviously don't know much about AMERICA! The majority of the country was made up of immigrants. We are a country of immigrants, so Weisskopf was as American as anyone else living and working here. So whether he or the Wright brothers was first, it was still an AMERICAN that did it first!!!
keithskye 1 year ago
@keithskye YES! What a hell a hell do you think i'm saying, genious?
:)
But if Weisskopf is the first...AMERICAN...why is still ignored by...AMERICANS? Why are the Wright Bros. still considered the first? Because they are "more americans" than the german? The first and WWII are over, why is still ignored? No matter how you cut it, the Wright Bros. didn't used the own aircraft's power on board, but a counterweight catapult/slingshot! Weisskopf on the first try...0.5 mile distance, 50 feet high!
RomaniaTricolor 1 year ago
The problem is the take off, not the "Wright bros. plane flew on it's own power, bud"!
If by absurd, the Wright Bros. plane was connected with a rope by a hot air ballon, and at, let's say 500 feet high, the engine is started and the rope is cut off and the plane is "flying", the question is: how did it get there, in the air? With his own power? NO! Is the ballon! So, is the same situation with the catapult. Start from 0 speed into the air with your own engine without any other EXTERNAL help!
RomaniaTricolor 1 year ago
Another situation, almost ideally:
-0 speed;
-0 degrees slope/ramp;
-0 wind speed;
...
-but is on a cliff.
:)
The airplane starts his engine, starts to gain speed, rolls, and is still on the ground, but is getting closer to the edge of the cliff, drops over the clif...and is "flying". Is this the first unassisted take off with his own power? NO!
Is understandable that Weisskopf is almost unknown to general public in Romania, but in US also? For crying outloud...
RomaniaTricolor 1 year ago
This is one inspiring video!
undertake999 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Santos Dumont created the airplane.
joaofga123 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Can Small electro-magnetized missiles levitate on a Jet's wing.Wing does not touch missile at all,only magnet levitation.Small missiles will obtain there own laser energized magnetism,because of solar cells that are around the missiles,they can become energized, photo-voltaic cells and can make magnet levitation,see when laser light shines(not sun light)on the missile's solar cells.This allows so creates levitation fields.Could be hard to balance the missile levitate properties,in high g-forces.
humexavier 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Wright brother's MAY not have been the first to fly. It is alleged that a NZ man flew before the W/bros with more than just staight lines but turns as well in what resembles a modern micro lite with tri-cycle.
blyndrotor 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
is this guy for real? lol
irish89055 4 years ago
the exhilaration of flight = the production of wepons of war?
ecaskew 4 years ago
self defense and deterrence and innovation. If not all modern conveniences were used for military purposes at one point such as: Internet, GPS navigation, 4 wheel drive vehicles and even cell phones.
neolink101 4 years ago 4
great vid
maaaUU77 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Report to US congress 2007 (GAO-07-406SP on page 78):
The F22 have at least 2 structural problems:
- The F22 have cracks in the aircraft's aft boom where the horizontal tail attaches to the fuselage.
-The F22 have cracs in "titanium casting" materials near the engine.
A key reliability requirement for the F-22A is a 3-hour mean time between maintenance, but but right now the mean time between maintenance of the F22 is LESS than 1 hour! The F22 is junk, its very unreliable!
Zeptocomp 4 years ago
lol that was in 2003
maaaUU77 4 years ago
for some the sky's the limit but for those who love aviation the sky is home
Frey7 4 years ago 6
This makes me want to cry. Its the movie I love to watch over and over about a thousand times.
HunterX109 4 years ago
Brilliant !
Olaio 5 years ago
Great starting =)
Juippiduippi 5 years ago