Added: 5 years ago
From: px5e9142
Views: 181,328
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (99)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the ppl n both car woulda get owned but the worst .... volvo

  • my dad have this bmw,tezao de carro

  • was ist das für ein scheisss

  • volvo looks so much worse

  • volvo is one of the best cars in the world

  • As I said in another post, passive safety is in direct relation to chassis engineering. So, the newer, the better. In these older models cabin compartment is not designed to withstand the extra forces of an offset impact, nor the front is conceived to absorb them before they deform the passenger cell. No airbags would have saved the driver, nor maybe the rear passenger behind him. Sad, but true.

  • were those cars damaged by the crash?

  • dude? probably not they look like they're new

  • well the BMW was smashed beyond repair

    however the volvo simply drove away unscratched

  • This is not pointless our body's cant handle an impact of over 80-90km and hasnent this video made you think twice about speeding?

  • wrong u can survive on even 300 km/h if u roll but not head on

  • That's scary!

  • All dead xDDD

  • How stupid are you? It clearly says that they are "special" digital cameras, used by the military. The show is new, and they use old cars because they are cheap...GOD!!

  • theyr using old cars coz the video is old note at 19 sec narrator saying 3 digital cameras normally used for military research lol

  • 1:34 the passenger wouldnt ove stood a chance

  • This crash test is totally pointless.

    poor cars, they destroy good cars without reason caus at speed of about 90-100 kmh there CANT be SURVIVORS!

    They knew that very important fact before crash, as we know that.

    Total waste. (but in 1 way very attractive) =))

  • there is always lucky people that can survive anything... and there is also bad lucky people that might die after falling in the street...who knows... probabilty isn´t everything.

  • Volvo rocks But why di they use an old volvo =S They aint so safe

  • the old ones are struckturaly solid the new ones are also solid with more absorption, neither car my '91 volvo 940T with a air bag or a brand new s60 would deliver some one from that alive all the safety stuff is for slower speeds

  • why dont they use Volvo 850 in the test´s the result would be very very diferent...(spell?)

  • true volvo 850 is like a brick hitting a piece of paper

  • el volvo quedo mucho mejor que ese bmv, ademas se nota como funcionaron los sistemas de volvo como el motor el cual es empujado abajo y hacia atras, en cambio en el bmb, el motor queda en la cabina, el volvo recibe al bmv y lo tira lejos y este salta ala china.

    volvo for life

  • yalan a.q. volvo daha saqlamdır !!!

  • very exciting.

  • Hasssiktir

  • WOOHOHOOOO !! Nice XD

  • Just remember this.... (CRASH!)

  • Does this make any sense?

  • is volvo better than bmw??

  • YEss,,

  • NnOoo

  • BMW is very safe too !

  • Next time, put crash dummies in there.

  • volvo is , was , & always will be the SAFEST car on the planet

  • What about those new MRAPs? Those combat SUVs are replacing the Humvees.

  • this is a more "real world" exapmle of what happens on the highways

  • 60 not much! even 100 mph is not too big speed. the idea is to use your BRAIN and control other drivers etc. Then you can brake in time!

  • ydea but think about this... you drive on the highways where every car are going in the same direction... Let say you are going @ 100mph and crash into a 60mph car, the imapct is 40mph, very survivable... but this test is done in a head on collision. 2 car @ 60 will result in a net 120mph impact... very different scenerios (even a 35mph head on will result in a full 70mph crash, yo can do the math.)

  • therefore this thing scary the crap out of me...

  • Wouldn't be in them.

  • i was in the bmw when this happened... hurted like hell cuz i sprained my ancle and couldn't walk for days :(

  • Crap.

  • volvo is much better than bmw...much moree quality,confort,luxury,safety etc...bmw is just a shit compared to volvo

  • dude , i bet the bmw m3 GTR can smoke any other volvo out there. iv'e been in a bmw. piece of shit u say?

    well guess again the i mean look at the volvo. it took serious damage man. gosh u have no sense of cars.

  • I never, ever drive over 50. EVER.

  • Shit - that was scary.

  • yeah especially if sumone was stupid enough to do that

  • ffffffffffffffuuuuuucccccccccc­hhhhhhhh!!! there u have a mix between both cars lol

  • Man, that was brutal. Looked like Princess Diana's car after she crashed.

  • hahahahha!!! that was funny man!!!

  • Very intressting

  • Well, whenn they saiing it wudent be any suvivers. they have prety wrong, i know abute a friend who are 20 years now who survived somthing like that. the cops said that he was lucky, but he crash like one times in the year. and he drive VOLVO 240

  • omg this clip is more then 10 years old! This is very rare kind of accident, never the less the Volvo is much more safer than a BMW.

  • note to self get a bmw... there safer

  • im from finland and i can say this: swedis are faggots and volvo suck aas!!!!!!!!

  • duh , you can put an airplane there i bet someone would die at this speed

  • there's no car safe at this speed...

  • The Volvo is in a better condition? Are you deaf? Is there more then one defenition of death? maybe slightly death, or a bit death?

  • Volvo is better and safer!

  • dunno if you saw the closeup, but the dirvers side was demolished by the bmw. they are both dead, but the volvo driver was completely crushed. idiot

  • Well. You gotta be crazy to drive at that speed. Besides, Volvo has got more sales in the last years and more beautiful cars. I recently got the brand new S80 and I´m so happy with it, sucker.

  • this test was done at 60 mph. when was the last time you went *slower* than 60 on the freeway, sucker?

  • C´mon! 60 is not so fast. But sure, at 60 any car will get damaged, but not as much as this clip shows, pal.

  • This clip is old but gets it right. i worked as an EMT and a 2 car direct head-on collision at 60 (like this video), though rare, is almost always fatal - even for Volvo's. That's why crash tests are done at 40mph or below - any faster and you get the result seen.

    My point was that 60 is not considered fast for most people. Most drivers (> 85%, my est) drive 60 or faster on the expressway. Hence my response to your comment "You gotta be crazy to drive at that speed. "

  • huh? looks like it shows the real shit to me

  • i think so, 60 mph is just like driving at 42 mph,

    almost as slow as the ford model T

  • kool

  • Caramba! Que porrada!!!!!!!!

  • If people are allowed to see things like this they might get afraid of cars and not buy any which would put us in a recession. Consumer safety laws should be overturned to help create jobs and prsperity in light of this realization.

  • Volvo rules!

  • y'know, this video's quality is a hell of alot better than the one i just watched, which is a relief, because my eyes hurt like hell.

  • Instant Death.

  • The BMW just sliced through the Volvo!

  • Volvo rules!

  • the bmw came out better, higher priced car though

  • the volvo is in better conditions

  • yeeah BMW e34 FTW. it looked like it was going a lot faster than the volvo before impact though...

  • bmw ftw!

  • Three high-speed cameras? Why did we miss the actual crash then?

  • BMW RULEZ!!!

    THE BEST CARS EVA!!!

  • amuahaha bende istiom lan bunlardan

  • So whats the point of wearing seatbelts?

    ..just kidding.

  • Damn that BMW just sliced through the Volvo! I agree even with modern cars your chance of survival in something like that is pretty much nil.

  • oyle bole dııl cok gusel opustuler yaaa

  • Uzaktan kumandalı arabalar hep böyle dandik oluyo :D

  • Putz, que desperdício. Utilizaram logo um Volvo e um BMW, ao invés de usar carros populares.

    AFFFFF!!!!

  • I think more if the cars were 2006 model year they would have done much better.

  • no way man...

    frontal collision!

    doesen't matter the year...

    the resultant crash will be like 120 mph, if both cars travel at 60 mph...

    2006 models wold be destroyed too

    ehehhe

  • harbi süper olmus bea,ikiside siki tuttu valla:D

  • manyak olmuş valla

  • great. now im scared for life.

  • same here.

  • Tenho muita vontade de ter um RC desses

  • rsrs

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more