911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!! OMG ITS SO OBVIOUS!! NWONWONWOI!!! how can TWO planes take down THREE BUILDINGS AAHHH!! PROOF!!! JET FUEL???....... HAHAAHAHAHAHAAH. Jet fuel is for pussys!! hundreds of PAYED GoVERNMENT WITNESSES OMG ITS SO OBVIOUS. ILLUMANATI!!!aahhhhh. THE GOV. GAVE YOU A STORY AND YOU ATE IT UP hahaha I CANT BELIEVE YOU FELL FOR IT!LOOK how open minded i am.... see it? do ya see it?? all the dead never existed,and i have proof, and NO you cant see it !! NWO !!!
More lies. When are the American people gonna stop the neo cons? After they gain control of the world perhaps? They are well on their way unless the American people, my friends and family, stop them. Please stop the madness.
keep up the fight 911 was an inside job wake up people our government has been infected by Nazi scum. I call on the good people of the government and the rest of the country to take back our sanity STOP allowing these Nazi war MONGERS
TO FRIGHTEN US INTO SLAVERY start a 911 truth group in the town you live in TAKE UP THE FIGHT IN THE INFO WAR if you sit on your ass on this one there gunna start a draft and were all fucked help us help yourself wake the fuck up
I dont suppose you'd like to comment about page 35 of the Commission repoort that states Bush first learned of the first attack outside the classroom at the school?....this should be interesting...
The first plane hit at 8:46am, Bush entered the classroom at 9am. News feeds cut directly to the scene almost immediately.
I'm sure you have some great huge conspiracy theory as to what all of this means. Bush heard that something hit the world trade center the same time we all did? Say it isn't so!
ABC NEWS Peter Jennings also broke to John Cochran in Florida and reported that Bush was told at the hotel 1/2 hour before he got to the school. You can watch the ABC footage. So he knew of it long before he even got to the school. Why put the false statement in the Report.
LOL. I disagree with you and that automatically makes me a shill. Your profiling skills are amazing.
Maybe Iran is the focus because their leader is comepletely insane? A noted holocaust denier and has said he wants Israel whipped off the map? Maybe thats why?
You didn't make a reply to my comment on WTC 7 so i'm guessing you have no rebuttal because i'm correct.
WTC 7 wasn't attacked hence it wasn't included in the report.
You play the Holocaust card because you are a vile shill. The Holocaust has absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. No relevance. You are using it to fear monger. Just like the Popular Mechanics stooges in the Loose Change debate. You fool no one.
Do you have any idea what you're talking about? I wasn't linking the holocaust with 9/11. I was saying that Iran's president is one, and he is mentally insance, which is why it is a prioriy to keep nuclear capabilities away from Iran as long as he has influence there.
Way to try and turn words around instead of forming a structurally sound rebuttal. You know, the basics to a debate?
He plays the Holocaust card because Dylan Avery is speaking at a known Holocaust deniers conference, there are many holocaust deniers in the twoof movement.
the plot of call of duty 4 modern wafare(very good game) is a middle eastern dictator
gets a nuke from a russian.(you play a u.s. marine during the middle east sinario's)
the nuke exploded and later you play a british special forces soldier trying to hunt down and kill the russian(you kill the dictator and the russian later on.)
the russian shoots nuclear missles at the u.s. you have to disarm them.after a big battle. you win/kill russian.(continued)
If you think it is like talking to a wall that is because most are well informed and educated and know most of the details, as documented so far, of the events of that day. The majority of the people who support the "official version" hardly know any details of any of the events of that day, let alone any of the details of the "official version".
No, it's the truthers that are misinformed, with their "documentaries" filled will disinfo, butchered quotes and interviews, manufactured evidence(like in 9/11 Mysteries where she implants he own SFX to make it sound like explosions) and other flat out lies.
Everything you said is simply not true. Everyone feel free to research these things for yourself. It is the official story (including the Popular Mechanics report, the NIST report, etc...) that is proved to be made up of nothing but blatant lies, distortions and omissions.
Really? And what would you recommend versus the 300+ engineers from the NIST and 150+ engineers from Popular Mechanics? What websites will you offer up ? Perhaps you could tell me which physics (credible ones) that have problems with the NIST findings? Or will you send me to the Ae911 site that anyone can sign up for and no one vets the name?
If you are to ignorant to see the truth of the events of 9/11 then that is on you. You are the one who has to live with yourself. I am tired of dealing with people who are so brainwashed that they choose to believe things that have no basis in reality. I'm sorry if I sound rude, but I am just being honest. I suggest you educate yourself to the world around you. Take care and God bless.
No sorry, the twoofers are largely misinformed, they know very little about what went on that day and instead like to make up things and twist words around. Constantly caught lying to try to make their words seem smart. They jump to conclusions and are too stupid to realize that they are too stupid. Most of them can only recite what a twoofer website tells them.
The same goes for those who defend the official story. They only repeat the proven lies of yellow journalism establishments and companies who blatantly lie in order to put false truth into the minds of the public.
"twoofers"
Ahhh....the childish name calling. That is simply brilliant. "Twoofers" That is hilarious. Whoever came up with that must have an IQ level that is off of the charts.
Twoofers are the name of people who insist on denying the truth. It is what I will refer to those ignorant and stupid enough to buy into the idiocy of the 'truth' movement. People who willingly disregard facts and reality for the sole purpose of embracing stupidity because of their dislike for Bush are naive and gullible individuals.
Oh they definitely do disregard facts, its one reason there is not a single credible scientist is able to produce a paper that supports them. For instance, the idea that the buildings fell at free fall. Or perhaps claiming that Marvin Bush was in charge of security, or the constant misquoting of witnesses.
Some people say "free fall speed", but most people realize that it is near free fall speed. Whatever the speed, to have been a pancake collapse, the fall would have broke the laws of physics.
Marvin Bush was not the head of security, but he was a principle in the company (Securacom) that was in charge of the security at the WTC complex.
As for misquoting eyewitnesses, even if some people do that, that still does change the fact that hundreds, if not thousands, of first responders are on record as saying that they heard and witnessed explosions.
I should have clarified what I previously said.
Sure, there will always be people who misquote and misstate things, but it is not representative of a collective group.
Although I generally agree with the stance you all represent, I REALLY feel that you need to be CONCISE. Its one thing to "preface" a question (3 sentences or so), its quite another to make it a presentation. That 1st questioner (and many others from the different videos out there) are perfect examples of shutting down the audience. The question of building 7 not included in the report is a MUCH better example. Would you rather people investigate? Or debate/bash/HOUND someone?
He does not exept "the idea, that the government was resposible for bringing down the WorldTrade towers. Period. No argument posible. Anyone who thinks different about this, is a complete moran.
This man has a bullshit answer for everything.
Bottomline. WTC7 was a controled demolition and 911 was an inside job.
Listening to Hamilton is just sickening. They continue to avoid Building 7. You know, showing one of the true videos of what hit the Pentagon would squash contrary claims to the Official story, unless those videos do not show what we have been told. Show us the plane....simple as that....
They have had six years to create a video showing the officially stated flight hitting the Pentagon. Releasing a video now would not put anything to rest, as far as that goes.
they sure as hell have no problem showing planes hitting the towers...What was headed toward the Pentagon was on radar being monitored and Cheney and Mineta both knew it and no one warned the Pentagon and 125 died...don't suppose you'd like to be one of the 125 that died without warning....
"hey sure as hell have no problem showing planes hitting the towers...What was headed toward the Pentagon was on radar being monitored and Cheney and Mineta both knew it and no one warned the Pentagon and 125 died"
You are correct.
I don't know what you meant by the last part of your comment. All I was saying is that even if a tape is released showing flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, that does not mean that flight 77 is what truly hit the Pentagon.
my last comment was a general statement.....that the emphasis is on the fact that it happened and people died(Very Sad), but the real emphasis should be knowing those people died when the highest authorities knew they were in danger and did NOTHING. nothing personal was intended..
You are incorrect the warnings of where flight 77 was was not told to NORAD until 9:24pm. Cheney didnt even enter into the bunker until sometime around 10pm. Minetta's testimony does not match up with the electronic data that shows when and what happened. Twoofers caught lying... again.
why dont you watch Norman Minetas testimony to the 911 Commission and educate yourself. Cheney was already in the PEOC when Mineta got there. The incoming target was on radar from at least 50 miles out and closing. Thats testimony from the Sec. of Transportation, not 911 people,,,thats just a direct quote of facts...sorry to disappoint you
The curious thing about all of this is that it did indeed come from a 911 twoofer named James Fetzer, a theologian who regularly mocks the victims on the planes. The problem with mineta's testimony is that it doesnt match up with much of the movements. I never said he didnt say it , I simply pointed out that it doesnt match up with the movements. So spare me the 'educate myself' line, Mineta himself is unsure of the time he entered into the bunker.
The curious thing though is that it proves nothing nor does it support the twoofers side of things, its just them leaping to a conclusion, and again raises the question, should they have fired on a civilian plane over civilian airspace? Minetta says he heard Cheney say the order still stands, but there is no mention of WHAT order, and indeed why any order of a military nature would come from Cheney. Remember Cheney is not in control of NORAD.
are you really that lost? they knew it was coming. and noone warned the Pentagon. 125 died because these guys made no effort to warn the Pentagon. Witnesses at the Pentagon were in meetings and the like and no alarms were sounded. 125 people died from negligence...next time you're at your desk...wonder if you would like to hear a siren and have a chance to head for an exit...those 125 would have
Further, there was no indication of where the plane would hit, if you look at the flight path it could've hit at any location, and lets not forget that there is an airport nearby as well, so your assumption that the three of them would've known where the plane was headed is without any foundation.
no one is calling you stupid, but the more you talk the more you give it away. @ attacks ahve already taken place, they are monitoring an incoming aircraft and were too lazy to set off an alarm in the Pentagon...shit...I hope they dont use tornado warnings like they used Pentagon alarms.
Actually I'm calling you stupid, so lets not get that confused here okay? First of all the transponders were turned off on the planes, again this is one of the most crowded air spaces in the entire country and again, you cannot claim that the plane was headed to the pentagon, nor would they have known that either, NORAD was given all of 6 minutes warning that flight 77 was hijacked.
Considering that there was no way to identify the incoming plane, nor where it is headed, nor what it will do you can do very little if anything to respond to it. If you look at the path Hanjour took it points directly to the mall.
Pentagon is a Primary target. Two attacks have already been committed, you have an incoming target and don't feel like setting off an alarm? Maybe you would have enjoyed sitting at your desk in the Pentagon while others knew it was coming and didnt bother to tell you to get to a safe place.
keep up the disinformation, the fact the folks like you continue disinformation is the give away of the considerable effort to misinform and further justifies reasons to question the events. the more you say is more reason to doubt your efforts...
No videos captured the plane except for the one at the parking attendant station. However 100+ eye witnesses all said plane, not one said anything else. Its amazing that ignorant twoofers ignore that.
now if thats the case,,,why bother to have the FBI confiscate all surrounding videos from businesses and and the highway dept. maybe someday, you will take time to educate yourself.
And then release all of them. Sorry but as the citgo video shows and the ones from the hotel, none of the cameras were pointed at it. The funny thing , and kind of sad is how you suggest I educate myself but you still do not respond to the 100 eye witnesses who saw the plane. Please.
This has been flagged as spam show
911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!! OMG ITS SO OBVIOUS!! NWONWONWOI!!! how can TWO planes take down THREE BUILDINGS AAHHH!! PROOF!!! JET FUEL???....... HAHAAHAHAHAHAAH. Jet fuel is for pussys!! hundreds of PAYED GoVERNMENT WITNESSES OMG ITS SO OBVIOUS. ILLUMANATI!!!aahhhhh. THE GOV. GAVE YOU A STORY AND YOU ATE IT UP hahaha I CANT BELIEVE YOU FELL FOR IT!LOOK how open minded i am.... see it? do ya see it?? all the dead never existed,and i have proof, and NO you cant see it !! NWO !!!
EARTH51087 1 year ago
Google "Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC"
WTCnucleardemolition 2 years ago
Zionist are behind all this , Lee hamilton is one of them by the way , and they are terrorist .
sofiane123456 3 years ago
More lies. When are the American people gonna stop the neo cons? After they gain control of the world perhaps? They are well on their way unless the American people, my friends and family, stop them. Please stop the madness.
markfor 3 years ago
9/11 was an inside job. Eat Greasy Burgers!!!
persona19 4 years ago 2
keep up the fight 911 was an inside job wake up people our government has been infected by Nazi scum. I call on the good people of the government and the rest of the country to take back our sanity STOP allowing these Nazi war MONGERS
catrapesdog99 4 years ago 3
TO FRIGHTEN US INTO SLAVERY start a 911 truth group in the town you live in TAKE UP THE FIGHT IN THE INFO WAR if you sit on your ass on this one there gunna start a draft and were all fucked help us help yourself wake the fuck up
catrapesdog99 4 years ago
I dont suppose you'd like to comment about page 35 of the Commission repoort that states Bush first learned of the first attack outside the classroom at the school?....this should be interesting...
rushfan9thcmd 4 years ago
yeah and.... what?
The first plane hit at 8:46am, Bush entered the classroom at 9am. News feeds cut directly to the scene almost immediately.
I'm sure you have some great huge conspiracy theory as to what all of this means. Bush heard that something hit the world trade center the same time we all did? Say it isn't so!
torrent29 4 years ago
He said that he watched the first plane hit. That wasn't shown on the news that day.
RandleEl11 4 years ago
ABC NEWS Peter Jennings also broke to John Cochran in Florida and reported that Bush was told at the hotel 1/2 hour before he got to the school. You can watch the ABC footage. So he knew of it long before he even got to the school. Why put the false statement in the Report.
rushfan9thcmd 4 years ago
9/11 practice run -- Amalgam Virgo
June 1-2 2001 Blue Team -- Canada, NATO
9/11 real deal -- Global Guardian
September 11-12 2001 Blue Team -- Canada, NATO
OperationMockingbird 4 years ago
Wow what a bunch of losers these 911 twoofers are.
torrent29 4 years ago
That includes you torrent29 da shill. Sad. What a waste of life. Your mother must be proud.
OperationMockingbird 4 years ago
She is :)
Yours prolly isn't what with your inability to actually think :)
torrent29 4 years ago
Sure doesn't sound like 64% of the audience is applauding. Sad.
WTC 7 wasn't in the report because it wasn't attacked by terrorists. It was hit as a result of WTC 1 collapsing.
Swazi4 4 years ago
Sad that you sold your soul to the devil to be a shill. And can't request a refund.
You know where you are going after you die. And it's not up.
OperationMockingbird 4 years ago
LOL. I disagree with you and that automatically makes me a shill. Your profiling skills are amazing.
Maybe Iran is the focus because their leader is comepletely insane? A noted holocaust denier and has said he wants Israel whipped off the map? Maybe thats why?
You didn't make a reply to my comment on WTC 7 so i'm guessing you have no rebuttal because i'm correct.
WTC 7 wasn't attacked hence it wasn't included in the report.
Swazi4 4 years ago
You play the Holocaust card because you are a vile shill. The Holocaust has absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. No relevance. You are using it to fear monger. Just like the Popular Mechanics stooges in the Loose Change debate. You fool no one.
OperationMockingbird 4 years ago
Do you have any idea what you're talking about? I wasn't linking the holocaust with 9/11. I was saying that Iran's president is one, and he is mentally insance, which is why it is a prioriy to keep nuclear capabilities away from Iran as long as he has influence there.
Way to try and turn words around instead of forming a structurally sound rebuttal. You know, the basics to a debate?
Swazi4 4 years ago
He plays the Holocaust card because Dylan Avery is speaking at a known Holocaust deniers conference, there are many holocaust deniers in the twoof movement.
torrent29 4 years ago
Spin. Spin. You can't win.
OperationMockingbird 4 years ago
continued). sound familliar???
putian(russian) and Ahmadinejad(middle east dictator) the invasion(first u.s. level)
probaly the iraq invasion or comming iran
invasion.
nukes
did the fokes at call of duty did ww3 what the x-files did for 9/11(lone gunman)??
antasaur 4 years ago
hears some thing interesting......
the plot of call of duty 4 modern wafare(very good game) is a middle eastern dictator
gets a nuke from a russian.(you play a u.s. marine during the middle east sinario's)
the nuke exploded and later you play a british special forces soldier trying to hunt down and kill the russian(you kill the dictator and the russian later on.)
the russian shoots nuclear missles at the u.s. you have to disarm them.after a big battle. you win/kill russian.(continued)
antasaur 4 years ago
Mr. Hamilton talks a lot sense but the problem talking to these conspiracy theorists is like talking to a wall.
arthur131313 4 years ago
If you think it is like talking to a wall that is because most are well informed and educated and know most of the details, as documented so far, of the events of that day. The majority of the people who support the "official version" hardly know any details of any of the events of that day, let alone any of the details of the "official version".
RandleEl11 4 years ago
No, it's the truthers that are misinformed, with their "documentaries" filled will disinfo, butchered quotes and interviews, manufactured evidence(like in 9/11 Mysteries where she implants he own SFX to make it sound like explosions) and other flat out lies.
Swazi4 4 years ago
Everything you said is simply not true. Everyone feel free to research these things for yourself. It is the official story (including the Popular Mechanics report, the NIST report, etc...) that is proved to be made up of nothing but blatant lies, distortions and omissions.
RandleEl11 4 years ago
Really? And what would you recommend versus the 300+ engineers from the NIST and 150+ engineers from Popular Mechanics? What websites will you offer up ? Perhaps you could tell me which physics (credible ones) that have problems with the NIST findings? Or will you send me to the Ae911 site that anyone can sign up for and no one vets the name?
torrent29 4 years ago
If you are to ignorant to see the truth of the events of 9/11 then that is on you. You are the one who has to live with yourself. I am tired of dealing with people who are so brainwashed that they choose to believe things that have no basis in reality. I'm sorry if I sound rude, but I am just being honest. I suggest you educate yourself to the world around you. Take care and God bless.
RandleEl11 4 years ago
No sorry, the twoofers are largely misinformed, they know very little about what went on that day and instead like to make up things and twist words around. Constantly caught lying to try to make their words seem smart. They jump to conclusions and are too stupid to realize that they are too stupid. Most of them can only recite what a twoofer website tells them.
torrent29 4 years ago
The same goes for those who defend the official story. They only repeat the proven lies of yellow journalism establishments and companies who blatantly lie in order to put false truth into the minds of the public.
"twoofers"
Ahhh....the childish name calling. That is simply brilliant. "Twoofers" That is hilarious. Whoever came up with that must have an IQ level that is off of the charts.
RandleEl11 4 years ago
Twoofers are the name of people who insist on denying the truth. It is what I will refer to those ignorant and stupid enough to buy into the idiocy of the 'truth' movement. People who willingly disregard facts and reality for the sole purpose of embracing stupidity because of their dislike for Bush are naive and gullible individuals.
torrent29 4 years ago
The 9/11 truth movement does not disregard facts and reality. The 9/11 truth movement has nothing to do with anyone's dislike of President Bush.
RandleEl11 4 years ago
Oh they definitely do disregard facts, its one reason there is not a single credible scientist is able to produce a paper that supports them. For instance, the idea that the buildings fell at free fall. Or perhaps claiming that Marvin Bush was in charge of security, or the constant misquoting of witnesses.
torrent29 4 years ago
Some people say "free fall speed", but most people realize that it is near free fall speed. Whatever the speed, to have been a pancake collapse, the fall would have broke the laws of physics.
Marvin Bush was not the head of security, but he was a principle in the company (Securacom) that was in charge of the security at the WTC complex.
RandleEl11 4 years ago 2
As for misquoting eyewitnesses, even if some people do that, that still does change the fact that hundreds, if not thousands, of first responders are on record as saying that they heard and witnessed explosions.
I should have clarified what I previously said.
Sure, there will always be people who misquote and misstate things, but it is not representative of a collective group.
RandleEl11 4 years ago
torrent,
sorry it took me this long to respond ...
you are such an agent or a lying idiot !
Anyone who doubts this just read `his' past posts !
gregallenk 3 years ago
Lies got us into war, only the TRUTH will get us out.
vancouver911truth(dot)org
TheParadigmShift 4 years ago
Good work! Keep it up. The TRUTH will prevail.
vancouver911truth(dot)org
TheParadigmShift 4 years ago
BEAUTIFUL! Rock on..................
jpcortijo 4 years ago
The way to go is:
articulate, respectful, well-researched dissent.
Understandably, the repercussions of the fact that the official story is unprovable are humongous.
Nevertheless, presentation IS important.
Do not alienate people.
Be civil, well-researched, articulate and respectful.
And fearless.
acrobat741 4 years ago 2
Do you think its possible that there was no Government involvement on 9/11/01.Saddly we forget about the heroism that day.
blueshadow1996 4 years ago
Although I generally agree with the stance you all represent, I REALLY feel that you need to be CONCISE. Its one thing to "preface" a question (3 sentences or so), its quite another to make it a presentation. That 1st questioner (and many others from the different videos out there) are perfect examples of shutting down the audience. The question of building 7 not included in the report is a MUCH better example. Would you rather people investigate? Or debate/bash/HOUND someone?
whatmanual 4 years ago
Way to be Cincinnati 911 Truth. Way to be. Everywhere these people go they are being confronted. People are waking up.
swizzlesteve 4 years ago
He does not exept "the idea, that the government was resposible for bringing down the WorldTrade towers. Period. No argument posible. Anyone who thinks different about this, is a complete moran.
This man has a bullshit answer for everything.
Bottomline. WTC7 was a controled demolition and 911 was an inside job.
WTFaboutWTC7 4 years ago 3
Listening to Hamilton is just sickening. They continue to avoid Building 7. You know, showing one of the true videos of what hit the Pentagon would squash contrary claims to the Official story, unless those videos do not show what we have been told. Show us the plane....simple as that....
rushfan9thcmd 4 years ago 3
They have had six years to create a video showing the officially stated flight hitting the Pentagon. Releasing a video now would not put anything to rest, as far as that goes.
RandleEl11 4 years ago
they sure as hell have no problem showing planes hitting the towers...What was headed toward the Pentagon was on radar being monitored and Cheney and Mineta both knew it and no one warned the Pentagon and 125 died...don't suppose you'd like to be one of the 125 that died without warning....
rushfan9thcmd 4 years ago
"hey sure as hell have no problem showing planes hitting the towers...What was headed toward the Pentagon was on radar being monitored and Cheney and Mineta both knew it and no one warned the Pentagon and 125 died"
You are correct.
I don't know what you meant by the last part of your comment. All I was saying is that even if a tape is released showing flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, that does not mean that flight 77 is what truly hit the Pentagon.
RandleEl11 4 years ago
my last comment was a general statement.....that the emphasis is on the fact that it happened and people died(Very Sad), but the real emphasis should be knowing those people died when the highest authorities knew they were in danger and did NOTHING. nothing personal was intended..
rushfan9thcmd 4 years ago
You are incorrect the warnings of where flight 77 was was not told to NORAD until 9:24pm. Cheney didnt even enter into the bunker until sometime around 10pm. Minetta's testimony does not match up with the electronic data that shows when and what happened. Twoofers caught lying... again.
torrent29 4 years ago
why dont you watch Norman Minetas testimony to the 911 Commission and educate yourself. Cheney was already in the PEOC when Mineta got there. The incoming target was on radar from at least 50 miles out and closing. Thats testimony from the Sec. of Transportation, not 911 people,,,thats just a direct quote of facts...sorry to disappoint you
rushfan9thcmd 4 years ago
The curious thing about all of this is that it did indeed come from a 911 twoofer named James Fetzer, a theologian who regularly mocks the victims on the planes. The problem with mineta's testimony is that it doesnt match up with much of the movements. I never said he didnt say it , I simply pointed out that it doesnt match up with the movements. So spare me the 'educate myself' line, Mineta himself is unsure of the time he entered into the bunker.
torrent29 4 years ago
The curious thing though is that it proves nothing nor does it support the twoofers side of things, its just them leaping to a conclusion, and again raises the question, should they have fired on a civilian plane over civilian airspace? Minetta says he heard Cheney say the order still stands, but there is no mention of WHAT order, and indeed why any order of a military nature would come from Cheney. Remember Cheney is not in control of NORAD.
torrent29 4 years ago
are you really that lost? they knew it was coming. and noone warned the Pentagon. 125 died because these guys made no effort to warn the Pentagon. Witnesses at the Pentagon were in meetings and the like and no alarms were sounded. 125 people died from negligence...next time you're at your desk...wonder if you would like to hear a siren and have a chance to head for an exit...those 125 would have
rushfan9thcmd 4 years ago
Further, there was no indication of where the plane would hit, if you look at the flight path it could've hit at any location, and lets not forget that there is an airport nearby as well, so your assumption that the three of them would've known where the plane was headed is without any foundation.
torrent29 4 years ago
no one is calling you stupid, but the more you talk the more you give it away. @ attacks ahve already taken place, they are monitoring an incoming aircraft and were too lazy to set off an alarm in the Pentagon...shit...I hope they dont use tornado warnings like they used Pentagon alarms.
rushfan9thcmd 4 years ago
Actually I'm calling you stupid, so lets not get that confused here okay? First of all the transponders were turned off on the planes, again this is one of the most crowded air spaces in the entire country and again, you cannot claim that the plane was headed to the pentagon, nor would they have known that either, NORAD was given all of 6 minutes warning that flight 77 was hijacked.
torrent29 4 years ago
Considering that there was no way to identify the incoming plane, nor where it is headed, nor what it will do you can do very little if anything to respond to it. If you look at the path Hanjour took it points directly to the mall.
torrent29 4 years ago
Pentagon is a Primary target. Two attacks have already been committed, you have an incoming target and don't feel like setting off an alarm? Maybe you would have enjoyed sitting at your desk in the Pentagon while others knew it was coming and didnt bother to tell you to get to a safe place.
rushfan9thcmd 4 years ago
keep up the disinformation, the fact the folks like you continue disinformation is the give away of the considerable effort to misinform and further justifies reasons to question the events. the more you say is more reason to doubt your efforts...
rushfan9thcmd 4 years ago
No videos captured the plane except for the one at the parking attendant station. However 100+ eye witnesses all said plane, not one said anything else. Its amazing that ignorant twoofers ignore that.
torrent29 4 years ago
now if thats the case,,,why bother to have the FBI confiscate all surrounding videos from businesses and and the highway dept. maybe someday, you will take time to educate yourself.
rushfan9thcmd 4 years ago
And then release all of them. Sorry but as the citgo video shows and the ones from the hotel, none of the cameras were pointed at it. The funny thing , and kind of sad is how you suggest I educate myself but you still do not respond to the 100 eye witnesses who saw the plane. Please.
torrent29 4 years ago
well, considering the witnesses cannot identify the same type of plane....which ones do you prefer ?
rushfan9thcmd 4 years ago
All of them :)
Please point me to one that saw anything but a plane. Let me know when you find one that claims it was a missile.
torrent29 4 years ago
The most telling moment came when he tried to be clear about what he achieved by serving on the 9/11 Commission:
"I believe we basically told the STORY of 9/11 AS WE WERE CHARGED TO DO by the statute, and it was widely if not unanimously accepted."
Sure the story you were supposed to create was widely accepted - at the time.
We know better now about why that story is bunk.
NoSideShowPlease 4 years ago 7