Added: 2 years ago
From: Sciencefail
Views: 4,557
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (98)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Sylvia Allen is 6000 years old.

  • Well, the earth HAS been here 6000 years.

    It's also been here 4.5 billion years before THAT.

  • Sarah Palin is 6000 years old.

  • That dude is pretty nonchalant for a guy that's holding uranium.

  • ya I would put that rock down if I were you

  • The earth has been here for 6000 years, but also a lot longer. She was right but what she meant wasn't.

  • @mwowner12 The accuracy of radiometric dating is often checked by comparing the radiometric date with non-radiometric dates of objects, such as historical accounts, tree rings, ice cores, etc. These results repeatedly demonstrate the validity of radiometric dating.

    There are over 40 different radiometric dating methods. Each has it own application, limitations, and dating range.

  • @mwowner12 idiot.

  • @mwowner12 The earth has been around 4,545 Million years, + or - 2 million years.

  • @mwowner12 Even if one form of radiometric dating was inaccurate, other forms of radiometric, and other forms of dating would show that.

    Besides radiometric dating, you also have Tree rings that date back well before 6,000 years. The concept of radiometric dating requires math, and some basic chemistry knowledge. However the Tree rings make a great example because in order for you yourself to disprove creationism you need only count 1 by 1 till you pass the age you believe the earth is.

  • @mwowner12

    Is it now? ALL the different methods? ALL the time?

    So what is accurate then?

  • @mwowner12

    Wait, are you saying the "6000 thousand year old Earth" is a theory now? Since when? And it's been proven too? (as opposed to the 4.5 billion year old Earth). You haven't heard of radiometric dating, have you?

  • @mwowner12

    You're right, there's no fail here... just a few billion years off, but that's not that much really lol

  • Is it just me, or was that guy handling Uranium a little too carefree?

  • @JimboWizbo It's not concentrated and refined Uranium like you would find in a nuclear plant or bomb. It emits alpha radiation which will deflected by something thin as a piece of paper. Gamma radiation you would need lead to protect yourself from. Alpha radiation is more dangerous if you accidentally get it inside your body by either inhaling radioactive dust or swallowing something that's radiated. I don't believe this piece of rock he's holding emmits much.

  • @TsunamiTruth deathray indeed. Darwinists are preparing a clone army to take down family values.

  • evolution is evil and these people want to round us all up and put us into fema camps. they also destroyed the towers on 9/11 with a death ray from outer space.

    look it up if you think im crazy

  • What happened to the congressmen that thought if to many refugees got on an island it could tip over? Thats a fail.

  • How the hell'd she get that number? Epic fail.

  • @chestbuster1987 she got it from some moron who counted back all of the people who lived in the bible -- to Adam & Eve to come up with October 4004 BC. haha,

    That is why its important to teach children Science instead of polluting them with religionistic crap

  • For the sake of the future of mankind. Give the american public a desent education! They got people in the White House who thinks the universe is 6000 years old, based on a fairy-tale from the bronze age.

    That is equivalent of beleving that a year is less than a second, based on Arabian nights.

  • @greyman000 Who in the White House is a young earth creationist? How can a public school prevent creationist parents from teaching their children to ignore their science teachers? You should come to the US some day. We have wonderful science programs in our schools.

  • @trueleroix I cannot point out anyone specific, but I know for a fact that both G W Bush and Palin are young earth creationists, even if none of them are in the White House (now).

    The US public education system is among the worst in the rich part of the world, even falling behind several developing countries.

    The what saves the US is that is a darn large country, and a few good private schools, but US still has to import over half of its professors and scientists.

  • @greyman000 About the education system please consult an almanac to see that the information that most people pass on (the bad US education myth) is destroyed by an unbiased source. Also, GWB is no young earth creationist, and Sarah Palin was never in the White House. I know that it is trendy to disparage the US, but please take those "facts" that people throw around with a grain of salt.

  • @greyman000, actually the US educational system failing is just a myth.

  • Holy Shit!!

    Only 0:27 in... and I'm scared!

  • Their answer to that would be that it depends on how you interpret the bible...

    Which is their MOST BRILLIANT one!

    They make the most rediculous claims based solely on "it's in the bible", but they refute the bible with "it's a matter of interpretation" when they seem fit! And still they're an influential group (how do they do it? ^^)

    This is also how they excuse themselves from beating their children with a rod and killing pregnant women who were raped.

  • Even though these make me laugh and question the intelligence of humans, I know that for someone like me who does not excel in any forms of public speaking, regardless of how knowledgeable or well rehearsed on the topic, I would probably say something just as stupid XD

  • For some reason, it's taboo to criticize religious beliefs, Even though they are fucking stupid. People think beliefs don't matter. But, can't you see, this obtuse ignoramus woman is voting on the environmental policy based on her dim-witted beliefs.

    Faith isn't a virtue, it's a vice.

  • She should be fired, instantly. Stupidity and ignorance of this magnitude should not be tolerated.

  • Why does it seem that only the biggest idiots get elected to office?

  • This is an awesome channel concept. Subscribed!

  • since pretty much every atom we have in our solar system came from the molecular clowd that formed the sistem ..wich in turn came from space dust ..wich came from stars ..and thoose stars where made from other space dust from other stars ..and so on ..

    in fact all atom originally where hidrogen ...but stars always fuse and create new atoms.

    so its pretty much impossible to measure how old the universe is whem the matter in it is always "reborn" at a nuclear lever.

  • holy crap. Learn to spell.

  • even fucking cave paintings are dated at 10.000 bc ...thats fucking 12 thousand years ago.

  • Creationists don't believe this. They believe God painted them to test our faith. He also put dinosaur bones in there for the same reason. And hung up stars far away for the same reason (And made sure it appears as if they'd been around for millions of years). Oh, these ppl will often also be offended if you think oherwise. They're the reason children have been coming into contact with facepalms younger and younger the past decades...

  • Lol, awesome channel

  • Man,I love science.

  • Ugh, no sir. Earth is 6 billion years old . Our univers is 13 billion years old.

  • Isnt more accurate figure 4.2 billion years

  • well it could have take the other 1.5 billions of years for earth to form rocks so technically, since the rocks are only 4.5 billion years old, the earth can be 6 billion years old

    i think they just had a misprint but i dont really care, i was just saying that could be the issue here haha

  • the age of the universe isnt determined yet ...since matter goes throo so many transformations u cant messure once its gone throo the cycle of matter>energy> matter...

    some matter that would seem 1 billion years old is cus it fas formed 1 billion years ago ..but before it could of been energy resulted from other matter and so on..

    earth's age is more close to 5 billion years ...not 6.

  • Ummm, no. What about radioactive dating. This is jacobh1995's other user btw.

  • radiation is components of atom ...if in the period of bilions of years thoose components form atoms, then fragment back to basic components ...then back to atoms ..and so on ...how will u meassure their age? u cant ..u only meassure how it was since they last went from component to atom...

    the only way u could measure the age of the universe is to find an atom that was formed at the beginning and is still intact ..wich is pretty impossible

  • How does a moron that thinks the Earth is 6000 years old get into congress? This idiot is in charge of eduation funding? Epic fail.

  • you'd be surprised how many religious people work for the gov especially under the bush administration

  • @marley54fd Too true, hopefully one day we will stop electing people with imaginary friends.

  • grade 1...lol.. i am not english ,so if you whant to speak in german , latin or in french like i speak in english, you are welcome compare you cultural intelligence with mine...it will be funny.. i was speaking of science..science need proof, evidence, and repetability to improved result....religion needs...faith..and hat is all it needs...

    why should i beleave in god instead of beleaving in votan, osiris,mercury, hermes, thor, ra, Quetzalcóatl , or big manitou...

  • Good. Then I think we can ALL agree that this IS a fail, as its based on false assumptions. Giving it any sort of credability or respect in the light of "its correct in context", just helps perpetuate it, and all the ignorance that comes with it.

  • funny video.. science is here to explain things, that is not a religion..of course, sometime, a theorie can be wrong,or misunderstood, this we it is call a theorie....religion is call the thruth....but religion itself is a theorie..

    anyway, on thiose video man, you are only making a fool of youself, do you know that...probabelly not..anyway... science is a vast domain including mathematics, biologie,nuclear, history, technologie...if science is wrong, stop taking your car, this is demonic..

  • religion is not a "theorie"

    nor a theory either

    it's just a stupid assumption

  • have you any proof that god exist, of course not .. so that is a theorie... god has been created by men to explain thing they don t understand, or thing they where afraid of.. in science, you have to be able to reproduced experiments to valid a theorie .. god cannot be explained, it cannot be reproduced, it cannot be found somewhere in the sky , so you wright this is not a theorie, this is just a story for children, like santa clauss..

  • Good job pointing out grade 1 type of thinking.

    Next time learn to spell

    And that gigantic paragraph could be summerized into

    If there is no evidence in any form for God therefore he doesn't exist.

  • fucking idiot 6 thousand years..

    she said it twice.

  • Well.......if you put it that way.

    Then it is a fail.

  • I have NEVER seen any evidence, nor heard any argument that proves the existance of god, and this is coming from someone who was raised in a conservative christian household. Outside of a dusty old re-re-re-re-re-re-re-revised bible, there is no supporting evidence, period. And trying to use philosophy in no means proves god.

  • And on top of this, why would a god create an entire universe just to dick around in the desert? Why doesnt the bible mention any useful information about the universe? Why are the bibles morals so backwards and crude? Dont you think a supremely omnipotent being could do better? There may be a creating entity, or a "god" if you like, but hes not in the bible, certainly not in the old testament. The god portrayed in the old testament is a small minded, maniacal, vindicative, egocentric dick head.

  • Dimented, the answer to your question "why would a god create an entire universe just to dick around in the desert" is simple: he wouldn't, and he didn't. Some of us get it, others don't. Hopefully in the near future more will get it than not.

  • God can exist

    just the christian god cant

  • whoa

    dont put christianity in this

    God could be the worst jerk in the world

    but you are thinking of the christian personal god

    I am talking about God

    not a personal God

  • finnsia.....i hate to burst your bubble, but the number of people who live in the past were the only explanation was the "bible", is dwindling

    racists,homophobes,conservativ­e and taking religion seriously, in today's society the notion of any of the things i mentioned up there is laughable,no one is OPENLY racist,no one is OPENLY homophobic, and ignorant ppl like your unfortunately are OPENLY idiots, oops i meant to say conservative, GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF THE PAST AND WAKE UP TO TODAYS SOCIETY

  • WHOA WHOA that isn't a fail!

    it isn't!

    that IS the belief within christians.

    Showing that she is a christian.

    And that is a beleif made according to the dates persented in the Bible.

  • You can believe the sky is green - you'd be wrong though. This is no different.

  • I don't think you get the point

    If chrisitanity says we dont have blood but cream soda in our veins

    then science is wrong

    christianity is right

    not because of the truth but it's under God's word which has to be taken on faith

  • "If chrisitanity says we dont have blood but cream soda in our veins

    then science is wrong

    christianity is right"

    Okay, this is just wrong. I have to assume you're trying to make some point on logic and how it relates to religion or something, and just failing miserably. Are you trolling or what?

  • stupid guest, you fail for not making a better answer.And you also fail at what at understand what i wrote.

    so double fail for you.

    Say any more comments and it will be triple fail for you.

    Nothing can come out of your mind that isn't a fail.

  • Ha! I can't stop laughing at this: "And you also fail at what at understand what i wrote." Haha! Oh man... Yeah, maybe people aren't understanding what you wrote because you can't write a coherent sentence.

    Oh, and triple fail? Oh no! Is that anything like a triple dog dare? You can go back to the playground now, little boy (though my suggestion would be to spend a little more time in English class). :-)

  • It was you who mentioned "triple dog dare"

    If you still carry with you childish idiocy...then you prove to the idiot

    nevermind that you just look at what I wrote

    stupid fuckers like you cant write shit for an argument

    I dont give a fuck about how I write something

    maybe assholes like you try to spell check everything in vain just so you won't be viewed as an idiot by people like yourself

    go troll elsewhere

  • Aww... did I hurt your little feelings? I mentioned "triple dog dare" to highlight your childish "triple fail" nonsense. I'm not at all surprised that this point zoomed right over your head.

    "stupid fuckers like you cant write shit for an argument"

    Haha! I just wanted to highlight this little comment since anyone here will have a very good laugh at the irony of it all. Don't blame others for your incoherence (which hampers your ability to communicate your completely illogical point).

  • Finnsia is a blind fucking retard.

    THIS BOOK WITH A BUNCH OF STORIES IN IT SAYS THESE THINGS HAPPENED. MUST BE TRUE! HURR DURRRRR.

  • ur an idiot and a troll

  • God has been proven by philosophy that God exists.

    I may be an athiest...but you really are an idiot and you bring down the ideology to look stupid

  • I already said my argument

    you couldn't make a rebuttle

    you mock others of acting like yourself

    I merely said that the so called facts in religion are out of context when used in science

  • You know what? I'm just going to reprint what you DID say. So here it is:

    "If chrisitanity says we dont have blood but cream soda in our veins

    then science is wrong

    christianity is right"

    That's what you said. The reason you're not seeing a so-called "rebuttal" to that is because that is literally crazy. There's no logic involved there. You can't rebut something unless it is at least partially based on reality in the first place. Anyone who's not crazy recognizes this.

  • I did say what I wrote to you earlier.

    Just look

    The argument or thought just wasn't fully thought out.

    But I DID write what I did earlier.

    just look...it wasn't to you but someone else

  • Yeah, and I responded to the crazy thing you wrote by pointing out that it didn't make any sense, and you went on about "triple fail" and some such nonsense. Get a clue.

  • I told you what I later wrote.

    Now respond to it or srsly fuck off.

    I wrote stuff after the triple fail thing

    I copied it and wrote it to you..

    and you still hang on to what I wrote from the start.

    RESPOND/reply

    to the VERY LAST comment that I wrote to YOU

  • Wow. Do you have a learning disorder? I pointed out the illogical part of what you said in my first comment. Then you act all offended and start slinging childish insults. I then respond in kind while explaining to you (again) why your comment didn't make sense. And now your still freaking out about it?

    Dude, you were wrong. Just say you were wrong about what you wrote instead of stubbornly acting like an uneducated fool, and insisting that "merely said" something that you didn't.

  • You are a stupid hypocrite.

    You were the one throwing childish insults.

    And you keep pointing to the VERY FIRST statement that I said. Yet I keep redirecting you to a more formed argument yet you keep avoiding it.

    And I did say it if you simply look.

  • It's very simple...

    I responded to this:

    "If chrisitanity says we dont have blood but cream soda in our veins

    then science is wrong

    christianity is right"

    After a couple childish responses you said eventually said this:

    "I merely said that the so called facts in religion are out of context when used in science"

    Except that that's NOT what you "merely said." You said something totally different, and you STILL haven't admitted that you said something that was painfully illogical and wrong.

  • so your saying a man that gave his rib to a man that is everywhere that made a woman who together heard a talking snake and decided to eat an apple to make us all suffer isnt literally crazy, and involves logic?

  • Oh, I'm not saying you can't believe it - I'm merely saying that if you feel that way, you should be rejecting science and that a good start would be switching off your computer and going to live a less hypocritical life.

    You'll probably tell me how the Bible offers eternal salvation but I think that the benefits of running water, heat, power and internet all come from science.

    If you think the Bible is so much better than science, reject science PROPERLY.

  • what the fuck

    man

    dont make such assumptions

    I am just saying that religion and science dont go together

    The clip tried to show that what the woman is wrong but according to the bible (and I am an athiest, so fuck you with your stupid assumptions) she is correct.

    So it's not a fail at all. There is THE TRUTH of which is objective and the truth of which is subjective (of where religion comes in)

  • You're describing doublethink, which is a good way to go insane.

    It's not big or clever.

  • Tell me how please...and no I didn't describe double think...

    Now stop with the idioctic childish insults and tell me how did I show double thinking.

    I merely said that the so called facts in religion are out of context when used in science

  • As usual - women are wrong!

  • you made a sexist fail

  • Wow, she was just covered in fail.

  • doing good work, glad I stumbled upon these videos.

  • epic science fail

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more