WATER, FOOD (particularly ones that will last a long time & are high energy), VITAMINS, MEDICINES, AUTOMATIC RIFLE + AMMO, BIBLE.
The Bill of Rights has been openly stolen & nothing done, so expect the worse, as everyone is too scared to do anything. By the time there is action it will be far too late & the only honorable path left will be to sacrifice one's self for freedom and the sanctity of God by dying while fighting the forces of Satan. God's will.
Posting comments about this video is helping the enemy people...please direct your righteous anger towards shopping. the only way we can defeat the terrorists is by making sure that, every man woman and child in this country has a blackberry and a pair of Nikes.
99% of all Americans have given up,waived there common law rights. you just did not know that you did it. Have a SSN ? why ?Contrary to popular belief, there is no law requiring a U.S. citizen to apply for a Social Security number to live or work in the United States so you have one right ? then you waived your common law rights. Have a drivers license ? you have waived your common law rights.
MANIPULATE the COST of OIL to $100+ per barrel (so-called War on Terror)...
$400 billion OIL profit a year to Saudi Arabia to be split between Dubya and Cheney's Murder Inc Administration (minus Sadam, he is a snitch and deserve to die)
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 2 - "The Privilege of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it."
Article 10 - "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
The Unitied States government was not granted the power to suspend the Great Writ by the Constituion.
This guy has no right to complain about bias from Fox News. Terrorists have no Constitutional rights anyway, and that goes for any other non-citizen. What about the way the hero of the marxist left treated innocent Japanese during the war? These illiberal dunces just hate anything Bush does without even thinking about it. Torture prevented the highjackings last summer, don't forget.
apparently you're wrong if a admitted drug smuggler gets granted immunity to testify against border patrol agents who,rightfully as far as I'm concerned, shot him in the ass. now the border agents sit in jail while the smuggler has a 5 million dollar law suit against the US.
Why is he considering terrorists as citizens? The Constitution is for the people by the people, Not for terrorists. The denial of Habeas Corpus applies to those seeking to do us harm during times of war. It's our governments job to protect us from a clear and present danger. Why does he even think these terrorists deserve any of our constitutional rights in the first place? They're not even citizen in the first place. Who a loon. Who's side is one in the first place?, I tell you it's not ours.
A comet "could" hit the earth tomorrow, but not very likely. But Keith would like for you to think it could. The actual right of habeas corpus is not stated anywhere in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. The Writ of Liberty--Suspendion of habeas corpus was established September 24, 1862, by President Lincoln.
In a section limiting the powers of Congress (Art. I, Sec. 9),"The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in causes of rebellion or invasion were the public safety may require it." as in war or acts of terrorism. If he told you this, then he would has a story you ya. Like they say don't let the truth get in the way of a good story.
Well, So do I, That's why we have our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Read them, know them, because if you don't know them, then you won't have them when you need them. I just don't like it when people like Keith takes things out of context like that, it only confuses people.
Take Rosie O'Donnell when she said that the right to bare arms isn't in our constitution. The heck if it isn't, it's the 2nd article. It's very important and is there to insure that we can govern our own government. It's there to protect us from our government.
Hi, KC, you're a moron, plain and simple. The point isn't the "where the public safety may require it", but IN CAUSES OF REBELLION OR INVASION. In fact, this is perfectly seen through your reference to President Lincoln, there was a REBELLION - Hello! Civil War? Sound like a rebellion to you? Who is rebelling here, who is being invaded here.
With regard to the 2nd Amendment, don't forget the FIRST part - the part which discusses bearing arms in order to form a MILITIA. Now, that is a little open to interpretation, but it is a fact that it does not specify individuals but rather a MILITIA.
So what you are saying is that the 2nd Amendment is the only part of the Constitution and Bill of Rights that gives no individual, an Individual Right,....right? BTW, All the Bill of Rights are Individual Rights. Read it sometime.
" The Bill of Rights limits the powers of the Federal government of the United States, protecting the rights of all citizens, residents".
I didn't say it is the only part that gives no individual an individual right - like I said, there are various interpretations on this issue, but the NRA and others always proclaim to the heavens the "right to bear arms" part without even referencing the issue regarding the militia and the context it was written in
All the articles in the Bill of Rights are individual rights, not state or federal. The 2nd Amendment insures all these rights will be enforced. It's not that hard to "interpret" or read, there's only ten of them. You go and read the 2nd Amendment and come back and tell me it doesn't give an Individual the right to Bear Arms and that this "Shell not be infringed"? To say other wise should be considered treason.
Secondly, about the 2nd Amendment, we have recently had a Supreme Court opinion that looked at this very question, and if did not need interpretation or some sort of guidance as to how the ENTIRE Amendment should be read, there would have been no question about it.
The bill of rights are protections from the federal government. they do not explicitly protect against state governments, thats why each state has there own state bill of rights. of course if it is a blatent act against someones rights, the courts may step in and reprimand the legislature
In regards to OKs intentional misquoted and misleading interpretation of Habeas Corpus, he tries to mislead you. ".......Public safety may require it." You see K.O. completely flies pass that part in the video at 3:58. If you know the truth, you can really see thru OK's BS.
Finally, About denying our Constitution to "non-citizens who wish to terrorize us", how do you even first know whether they are truly citizens or not if you don't have habeas corpus? You don't even have the ability to show you are a citizen if they can just call you a foreigner and throw you in a dungeon. Second, you don't know they are terrorists until you have a TRIAL. A confession garnered by torture is unreliable, which is why we don't allow one in our justice system.
We were, and many say we still are under a clear and deadly threat. It is our governments job to protect us from any clear and present dangers., in fact, that should be their only job, protecting us from threats against us. BTW, I have no problem denying our Constitution to those non-citizens who wish to terrorize us by means of mass death, like those involve in 9/11. I don't think terrorist should have any rights.
I repeat again, the public safety part is not the meat of phrase, the phrase speaks to the suspension of habeas corpus in the times of rebellion and invasion where the public safety requires it - with the Civil War, not only was there a rebellion but the public safety did in fact require it. My focus on the REBELLION and INVASION sections comes not from KO but from my Constitutional Law professor
as a juror you have the power and the duty! to return a not guilty verdict to protect the given rights for a fellow American, Do it and spread the word for all others in your county. Local power is the only level we can control. Do not let another citizen be violated by your local governement!!
Rob I could not agree more on the term you used "sheeple". We are all being led like a heard of sheep and unfortunately it is not the mere shearing of our wool but the pure and simple "wool" being pulled over our eyes. Americans and the world are all being led to the slaughter. We as True Christians not transcendental christians, must bring all of their transgressions to light. Peace and God Bless
FUCKING BUSH, talking about murder and justice, yet he allowed the murder of so many on 9/11.
houndeye 11 months ago
I'll repeat what JAFO82269 said,
WATER, FOOD (particularly ones that will last a long time & are high energy), VITAMINS, MEDICINES, AUTOMATIC RIFLE + AMMO, BIBLE.
The Bill of Rights has been openly stolen & nothing done, so expect the worse, as everyone is too scared to do anything. By the time there is action it will be far too late & the only honorable path left will be to sacrifice one's self for freedom and the sanctity of God by dying while fighting the forces of Satan. God's will.
karlkarlkarl1234 1 year ago
FOOD, WATER, GUNS, AMMO.
JAFO82269 3 years ago 3
why does the guy talk as if
he has never heard of:
the declaration of independence
bill of rights
constitution...???
ic300x 3 years ago
because the Bush administration acted like THEY'D never heard of them when passing all this legislation.
soopa76 2 years ago
Posting comments about this video is helping the enemy people...please direct your righteous anger towards shopping. the only way we can defeat the terrorists is by making sure that, every man woman and child in this country has a blackberry and a pair of Nikes.
McConsumer 3 years ago
you must be kidding
Derleiter17 2 years ago
In fact I was
McConsumer 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
99% of all Americans have given up,waived there common law rights. you just did not know that you did it. Have a SSN ? why ?Contrary to popular belief, there is no law requiring a U.S. citizen to apply for a Social Security number to live or work in the United States so you have one right ? then you waived your common law rights. Have a drivers license ? you have waived your common law rights.
kothjjh 3 years ago
scary
Leedomty 4 years ago
"Habeas and trial by jury are Maritime Admiralty as they are Universal Law" -- United States v. Bevan (1818)
We've never had our own law in America.
neothomist1275 4 years ago
The NeoCON Plan is to create CHAOS (911)...
MANIPULATE the COST of OIL to $100+ per barrel (so-called War on Terror)...
$400 billion OIL profit a year to Saudi Arabia to be split between Dubya and Cheney's Murder Inc Administration (minus Sadam, he is a snitch and deserve to die)
envyjealous 4 years ago
power corrupts all men
Ashkeeper 4 years ago
They are lying to us!
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 2 - "The Privilege of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it."
Article 10 - "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
The Unitied States government was not granted the power to suspend the Great Writ by the Constituion.
davidchenard 4 years ago 2
MAYBE CUS IM SPEAKIN THE TRUTH
rashadi05 4 years ago
MY COMMENT KEEP GETTTIN BLOCKED
rashadi05 4 years ago
Never surrender your God given rights.
Fight for them if necessary.
ommmonet 4 years ago
President Bush, why do you hate America?
agentCDE 4 years ago
Laure Bush to doctor: I hear Xyban works well.
baucom88 5 years ago
This guy has no right to complain about bias from Fox News. Terrorists have no Constitutional rights anyway, and that goes for any other non-citizen. What about the way the hero of the marxist left treated innocent Japanese during the war? These illiberal dunces just hate anything Bush does without even thinking about it. Torture prevented the highjackings last summer, don't forget.
Tony1584 5 years ago
apparently you're wrong if a admitted drug smuggler gets granted immunity to testify against border patrol agents who,rightfully as far as I'm concerned, shot him in the ass. now the border agents sit in jail while the smuggler has a 5 million dollar law suit against the US.
adrian24 5 years ago
lawl
ajax731 5 years ago
Why is he considering terrorists as citizens? The Constitution is for the people by the people, Not for terrorists. The denial of Habeas Corpus applies to those seeking to do us harm during times of war. It's our governments job to protect us from a clear and present danger. Why does he even think these terrorists deserve any of our constitutional rights in the first place? They're not even citizen in the first place. Who a loon. Who's side is one in the first place?, I tell you it's not ours.
KCtheKat 5 years ago
this could apply to americans.
dregsta 5 years ago
A comet "could" hit the earth tomorrow, but not very likely. But Keith would like for you to think it could. The actual right of habeas corpus is not stated anywhere in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. The Writ of Liberty--Suspendion of habeas corpus was established September 24, 1862, by President Lincoln.
KCtheKat 5 years ago
In a section limiting the powers of Congress (Art. I, Sec. 9),"The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in causes of rebellion or invasion were the public safety may require it." as in war or acts of terrorism. If he told you this, then he would has a story you ya. Like they say don't let the truth get in the way of a good story.
KCtheKat 5 years ago
If he told you this, then he wouldn't have a story you ya. Like they say, Don't let the truth get in the way of a good story.
KCtheKat 5 years ago
interesting ,ill look into it but i still fear the goverment.
dregsta 5 years ago
Well, So do I, That's why we have our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Read them, know them, because if you don't know them, then you won't have them when you need them. I just don't like it when people like Keith takes things out of context like that, it only confuses people.
KCtheKat 5 years ago
Take Rosie O'Donnell when she said that the right to bare arms isn't in our constitution. The heck if it isn't, it's the 2nd article. It's very important and is there to insure that we can govern our own government. It's there to protect us from our government.
KCtheKat 5 years ago
Hi, KC, you're a moron, plain and simple. The point isn't the "where the public safety may require it", but IN CAUSES OF REBELLION OR INVASION. In fact, this is perfectly seen through your reference to President Lincoln, there was a REBELLION - Hello! Civil War? Sound like a rebellion to you? Who is rebelling here, who is being invaded here.
technicschic 3 years ago
With regard to the 2nd Amendment, don't forget the FIRST part - the part which discusses bearing arms in order to form a MILITIA. Now, that is a little open to interpretation, but it is a fact that it does not specify individuals but rather a MILITIA.
technicschic 3 years ago
So what you are saying is that the 2nd Amendment is the only part of the Constitution and Bill of Rights that gives no individual, an Individual Right,....right? BTW, All the Bill of Rights are Individual Rights. Read it sometime.
" The Bill of Rights limits the powers of the Federal government of the United States, protecting the rights of all citizens, residents".
KCtheKat 3 years ago
I didn't say it is the only part that gives no individual an individual right - like I said, there are various interpretations on this issue, but the NRA and others always proclaim to the heavens the "right to bear arms" part without even referencing the issue regarding the militia and the context it was written in
technicschic 3 years ago
All the articles in the Bill of Rights are individual rights, not state or federal. The 2nd Amendment insures all these rights will be enforced. It's not that hard to "interpret" or read, there's only ten of them. You go and read the 2nd Amendment and come back and tell me it doesn't give an Individual the right to Bear Arms and that this "Shell not be infringed"? To say other wise should be considered treason.
KCtheKat 3 years ago
Secondly, about the 2nd Amendment, we have recently had a Supreme Court opinion that looked at this very question, and if did not need interpretation or some sort of guidance as to how the ENTIRE Amendment should be read, there would have been no question about it.
technicschic 3 years ago
The bill of rights are protections from the federal government. they do not explicitly protect against state governments, thats why each state has there own state bill of rights. of course if it is a blatent act against someones rights, the courts may step in and reprimand the legislature
alexthelion828 3 years ago
In regards to OKs intentional misquoted and misleading interpretation of Habeas Corpus, he tries to mislead you. ".......Public safety may require it." You see K.O. completely flies pass that part in the video at 3:58. If you know the truth, you can really see thru OK's BS.
KCtheKat 3 years ago
Finally, About denying our Constitution to "non-citizens who wish to terrorize us", how do you even first know whether they are truly citizens or not if you don't have habeas corpus? You don't even have the ability to show you are a citizen if they can just call you a foreigner and throw you in a dungeon. Second, you don't know they are terrorists until you have a TRIAL. A confession garnered by torture is unreliable, which is why we don't allow one in our justice system.
technicschic 3 years ago
We were, and many say we still are under a clear and deadly threat. It is our governments job to protect us from any clear and present dangers., in fact, that should be their only job, protecting us from threats against us. BTW, I have no problem denying our Constitution to those non-citizens who wish to terrorize us by means of mass death, like those involve in 9/11. I don't think terrorist should have any rights.
KCtheKat 3 years ago
I repeat again, the public safety part is not the meat of phrase, the phrase speaks to the suspension of habeas corpus in the times of rebellion and invasion where the public safety requires it - with the Civil War, not only was there a rebellion but the public safety did in fact require it. My focus on the REBELLION and INVASION sections comes not from KO but from my Constitutional Law professor
technicschic 3 years ago
as a juror you have the power and the duty! to return a not guilty verdict to protect the given rights for a fellow American, Do it and spread the word for all others in your county. Local power is the only level we can control. Do not let another citizen be violated by your local governement!!
songboat 5 years ago
where have all the good people gone?
biged2226 5 years ago
Bush and Fox News= Nazi's
GOP= Gang of Pedophiles and Nazi sympathizers
If you care about freedom more than fear tactics than vote these Republicans out of office and shut up anybody that stands for dictorship in America
waroo3 5 years ago
Rob I could not agree more on the term you used "sheeple". We are all being led like a heard of sheep and unfortunately it is not the mere shearing of our wool but the pure and simple "wool" being pulled over our eyes. Americans and the world are all being led to the slaughter. We as True Christians not transcendental christians, must bring all of their transgressions to light. Peace and God Bless
kesikes 5 years ago
this is terrifying....
jonnycayman 5 years ago
it doesnt seem to hold thee attention of the young ones
too bad cause thier the ones being harrassed and searched
RMCrowley 5 years ago
Bill of Right... I only wish it were amusing :-/
eqster 5 years ago