Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What do you think of the dracs having a purpose in conciousness, as in a motivator for the opposing side.

  • @bavwill that being the good side, if there is one.

  • That's a good perspective I think. Might not be exact ..But good none the least. Peace.

  • @247News1 - Thanks! So many stories so many 'histories', I'll be glad when i get are much better perspective and with much greater clarity. It's probably going to come from within, or from a higher realm, or the greater reality. Thank you for your thoughts and kind words. (its soooo much better than "god this guy is so full of sh@t I can't believe it!" lol)

  • "it wouldn't be fun for them..." I think is more complex than that

  • @sbusumacinta - yep, I do too.

  • We "human beings" are "Being Human"

    We are infinite consciousness having chosen experiences... The history or story of this particular physical dimension is a conflicted one... Yes there are many "aliens" among the natives, but even the natives are alien from many millions of years ago...

    I am a ghost like you Rich. In and out of this physical dimension. I am alien to the natives but cloaked in illusion for the natives sanity sake...

    Much love to all... Wake up sleepers!!!

  • @bigdeadrobot - Well said my friend ;-)

  • i heard a robert bruce interview once and he was asked, what if all of this OBE thing and the afterlife thing were all just a thing your brain can do. and mr. bruce was asked that because of how they dont know everything about the brain yet and so it may still have those potentials. and if the brain is capable of creating things like obe experiences and clairvoyance, then how do you know whether you'd still exist after you die

  • @cannabisbisbisbisbis I think of the brain as a biochemical super computer - sort of analogy. Super computers these days are capable of creating holograms that you can see clearly. And in this regard so could the brain.. and what is observed could be called 'reality as we know it'. But I like to consider the question "If the brain is creating this... who or what is the observer of that which the brain has created?" In other words - is the brain the "I" , is the brain the self aware observer?

  • Rich/ General Public, are you familiar with the 7 Hermetic Principles? To my knowledge, the law of Attraction is derived from a fraction of these 7 principles.

    1. Mental-ism

    2. Correspondence

    3. Vibration

    4. Polarity

    5. Rhythm

    6. Cause & Effect

    7. Gender

  • @QAF1love Hi there, I don't know in specific how the Law of Attraction is dervied from these 7 principles, but it surely makes sense. All I know is that the Law of Attraction is greatly flawed and limited, but I think it is sold on purpose as the answer to all questions to further confuse and mis-lead people. The law of attraction applies to many things, but the law of Awareness is the one that really matters, check out the article Law of Attraction vs Law of Awareness by montalk.

    All the best

  • @IlluminatiSensor - I just the article. Law of Attraction vs Law of Awareness by montalk. Damn that's good! And Imean REALLY GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!

    Thanks you so much for bringing it to our attention. I've known for quite awhile that something wasn't making sense with the law of attraction - and this article explains things very well & sheds a lot of light on the whole subject.

  • @Rich2150x No problem Rich, I am glad I could help out. Montalk's article really helped me to confirm what I had felt intuitively for a while. I am not too good with words :-) and can't always explain complex knowings of mine really well, and I am always grateful when somebody like Montalk can put experiences similar to mine into words, so I can share them with others. The dynamic of psychic attack and negative magick gets totally (intentionally) forgotten when it comes to the Law of Attraction.

  • @IlluminatiSensor From my own research the "Law of Attraction" seems to closely resemble the third hermetic principle of vibration. I also read that article by montalk, simply amazing. Thanks for sharing.

  • @QAF1love Hi QAF1, that feels a lot better to me to call it the Law of Vibration, and is a lot more accurate. The problem in this world is that it is vibrating so low that if you are vibrating very high you won't attract anything because everything is so low :-)So you actually only attract money etc. if you vibrate very low. So what you want to do is vibrate high and low at different times. Vibrate low for a while to attract money and then vibrate high again to spend that money once you have it.

  • @QAF1love Continued...Once enough high vibrational beings have through temporarily and intentionally vibrating lowly attracted enough of the at the moment low vibrational money and spend it on high vibrational things, over time money will become more high vibrational and then the money will be naturally attracted to high vibrational beings without them having to go into the low vibrations anymore.

    This is what you call true money laundering hahahahaha and that is what we need to win this game.

  • @QAF1love ... you bet!

  • @QAF1love is this from the kybalion?

  • @imfreeinfinity Yes, but I read about it in a book called "The Secret Source" by Maja D'Aoust and Adam Parfrey. The meat and potatoes start & end on pages 71-100 where it goes into detail about the 7 principles.

  • @QAF1love Thanks QAF - I'll have to check these out too.

  • Thanks Rich, this is very interesting information. Man, I'm determined to make that shift into higher realms. The more I learn, the more homesick I get.

    Thanks again

  • @QAF1love - I understand abt the homesick thing - I get it too sometimes. And you are very welcome.

  • Great video Mr. Interviewer and Rich hahahaha :-)

    No seriously :-), very good points, and true in my opinion, you are presenting.

    Have an enjoyable Friday the 13th......

  • @Rich.

    Gr8 vid once again. Recently i saw a Coast2Coast AM interview youtube video that sum1 says Zachariah Sitchen' decyphering of Babelonian tablets has a loada inconsistencies, errors and assumptions causing him to doubt the thing of Annunaki.

  • @pappavis - There are a few inconsistencies for sure. I find it all to be so very interesting and relevant.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more