@SibirianHusky , Russia doesn't want to fight. We want peace! In S. Osetia we fought for South Osetia independent! Soviets didn't supported terrorists. This is false. Why USA builds bases near Russia? Do Unated States want war witch Russia? If USA will attack us, we will fight for our independent and go to Washington D.C.! Only if USA will attack us...
We would all be fucked... every single one of us.......... Russian or american.... The superpowers have enough nukes to wipe out the world 6 times over... if they did attack in 1989 then we would not know because we would all be dead.......
@zomblood ,alcoholic is not face of Russia... Sorry, Russia do not want to play with USA))) We want live and live) But US Forces (Under Swastikas Forces) fought in Iraq, Afhan, South Osetia (did you hear Bush'es speech?)... SAY ME! WHO WANTS PEACE???!!! SAY NOW!!!
@SibirianHusky , this is false. Russian plains drop bombs on military objects. But I can fuck USA honour too... US FORCES = UNDER SWASTIKAS FORCES!!! Hahaha... ha... This isn't funny for world... Sorry...
Nope ohio calss carries thee most missiles out of any submarine (SLBM's) she carrys 24 trident D5 and C4 ( Due for upgrade to D5) each can carry 16 MIRV warheads but SALT II restricts them to 10 per missile.
1) yes i have been to sea 2) yes ive been on a submarine both UK and Russian the author of the video knows me well so should be able to clear up your misconceptions.
My stepdad served in the soviet navy 1962 1974 and the russian navy 1992 to present (roughly)
tactical speed? do you know what tactical speed is? do have any idea what you are talking about? have you ever been out to sea on a submarine? are you a sonar technician or officer on a submarine? I'm asking these questions to point out the fact that you are an idiot and really truly have no idea what your talking about. please shut up.
Tactical speed is the speed at which its safe to travel at a viable depth without cavitating, ie 500feet at 15knots is around the seawolfs tac speed. the sea wolf is most obviously a quieter submarine for the fact its 15 years newer than akula and akulas are only as quiet as 688i
after serving 2 years in the navy i think i know exactly what im talking about only reason i had to leave was on medicle ground, i served on HMS Tireless S88 and HMS Trafalgar S108 as a TSM warfare rating (tactical submarine warfare department)
Don't be ridiculous. Akula II class submarines are quieter than 688i class submarines. Learning before writing is a good habit, especially if u don't want to look like an idiot. In the other hand, 688i's sonar systems are better than Akula's sonar systems, so probably they will detect each other at the same time in a supposed meeting.
.... The Virginia class don´t carry tridents, its an attack submarine not a slbm carrier. And there isn´t any submarine in existence that can carry so much tridents... LOL
Funny, But once again this is just complete and utter russian bullshit. They would never be able to get their boats in the water let alone track one of our boats with just an akula.
Actually, since the Trafalgar class is a Nuclear sub it cant be the worlds quietest sub. even if it is ever so slight, the hiss of nuclear reactors is white noise, nigh impossible to cancel out. While it might be the quietest nuclear submarine, conventional submarines running on Batteries or fuel cells are a lot quieter. But then again, conventional subs have other drawbacks.
absolute russian bullshit. no US navy admiral ever said any such thing. stupid russians, your best shit is about as silent as a 688I, and even then your shit cant hear as good as ours.
Coast guard would have nothing to do with a sub search and destroy. Russians would use SIERRA II, not akula. And shkval might be better choice than SET-65.But shkval is obviously russian, if they didn't care who new, they would use OSCAR II and guided missles. Either way, video is wrong.
Man, you haven't understand this!!! Russian submarine wasn't sunk at all!! Russian sub destroys that radar plus an US sub on the way home. Akulas capitan after gets a medal from the President.
90% of Russian war was on own border...
that means WE DEFEND !!!!
USA ??? 100% of war was outside !!!!!!!
after tehy have stole the country from the native american and make then to slaves
wow respect u are stong lol...
29 nato countrys now in afghanistan.. and all they suck hard lool
soviet did much better even usa supports terrorits
what a shame .. usa talk so much against terror.. but they trade with them
SibirianHusky 1 year ago
@SibirianHusky , Russia doesn't want to fight. We want peace! In S. Osetia we fought for South Osetia independent! Soviets didn't supported terrorists. This is false. Why USA builds bases near Russia? Do Unated States want war witch Russia? If USA will attack us, we will fight for our independent and go to Washington D.C.! Only if USA will attack us...
racdenis 1 year ago
@SibirianHusky , SORRY GUY!!! I only learn English and my first topic is for Under Swastikas Forces (US Forces)...
racdenis 1 year ago
@SibirianHusky so what do u call the war of 1812???
Nielsenkc 2 weeks ago
/watch?v=b_DPWtK4MrQ
TheTomgore 2 years ago
Fuck USA rot in HELL.
aviomaster 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
NATO, fuck you!!! Bush, fuck you!!!
racdenis 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
NATO sucks
Dafroft 2 years ago
But NATO sucks)))))))))
racdenis 2 years ago
I think CCCP should have attacked USA in 1989 ,,.,
aviomaster 2 years ago
We would all be fucked... every single one of us.......... Russian or american.... The superpowers have enough nukes to wipe out the world 6 times over... if they did attack in 1989 then we would not know because we would all be dead.......
azzaaaron17 2 years ago
@azzaaaron17 , USSR didn't wanted to attack USA. War is not an answer!
racdenis 1 year ago
@aviomaster So all you russian alcoholic fags are jealous of the US and NATO. Got it. Thanks.
zomblood 2 years ago
@zomblood
jealous ??? ahaha
so please explain WHY
USA THE LOSER COUNTRY used
OLD RUSSIAN VTOL Blueprints of the YAK-141/38 for the NEW LOSER plane called F35....
why did clinton buy 1st blueprionts of stealh from russia ^^
caus it was russian invention
btw better drunk thank a fucking dump fat crackhead bum ass bitch
SibirianHusky 1 year ago
@SibirianHusky , so explain me WHY Russia is looser in american PC games? We (russians) can answer too...
racdenis 1 year ago
@zomblood ,alcoholic is not face of Russia... Sorry, Russia do not want to play with USA))) We want live and live) But US Forces (Under Swastikas Forces) fought in Iraq, Afhan, South Osetia (did you hear Bush'es speech?)... SAY ME! WHO WANTS PEACE???!!! SAY NOW!!!
racdenis 1 year ago
@racdenis
hey it was an example with alcoholic..
btw .. im russian too ...
bush hmm hear a lot of speechs .. mot of them he was drunk...
but dont to memorize a lot of them..
only i need to know hes a fool
SibirianHusky 1 year ago
@SibirianHusky , DO YOU CAN SPEEK RUSSIAN? Please...
racdenis 1 year ago
NATO sucks)))
racdenis 2 years ago
@racdenis
yes tehy sux ... couble of gays...
kid killers !!!! drop bomb on kids... and feel strong..
damn nazi motherfuckers ^^ mean new germany
SibirianHusky 1 year ago
@SibirianHusky , this is false. Russian plains drop bombs on military objects. But I can fuck USA honour too... US FORCES = UNDER SWASTIKAS FORCES!!! Hahaha... ha... This isn't funny for world... Sorry...
racdenis 1 year ago
where you downloaded this game? gde tq ska4al etu igru>
janeck123 3 years ago
finally done w/ my homework ne1 4 chat? r
SoldatKratos 3 years ago
I have a friend who says Virginia has better equipment. I happen to love the Seawolf.
Fubieman 3 years ago
Tom Clancy could hang himself in a closet after seeing this! :)) Sub comander was a funny game. Flying sub trick was awesome! Hahaha
Shoehanger 3 years ago
Nope ohio calss carries thee most missiles out of any submarine (SLBM's) she carrys 24 trident D5 and C4 ( Due for upgrade to D5) each can carry 16 MIRV warheads but SALT II restricts them to 10 per missile.
VolvoFH12580 4 years ago
and another thing i do know the capibilities of vessels its why i was in the navy myself.
VolvoFH12580 4 years ago
1) yes i have been to sea 2) yes ive been on a submarine both UK and Russian the author of the video knows me well so should be able to clear up your misconceptions.
My stepdad served in the soviet navy 1962 1974 and the russian navy 1992 to present (roughly)
VolvoFH12580 4 years ago
At tactical speed the seawolf is far quieter than the akula II but the akula II is quieter than the 688i.
And maxriga i am kapitan you know what i mean ;)
VolvoFH12580 4 years ago
tactical speed? do you know what tactical speed is? do have any idea what you are talking about? have you ever been out to sea on a submarine? are you a sonar technician or officer on a submarine? I'm asking these questions to point out the fact that you are an idiot and really truly have no idea what your talking about. please shut up.
ParksTrailer 4 years ago
Tactical speed is the speed at which its safe to travel at a viable depth without cavitating, ie 500feet at 15knots is around the seawolfs tac speed. the sea wolf is most obviously a quieter submarine for the fact its 15 years newer than akula and akulas are only as quiet as 688i
VolvoFH12580 4 years ago
and you are an idiot. tactical speed is a term you made up. not used in the submarine community
ParksTrailer 4 years ago
after serving 2 years in the navy i think i know exactly what im talking about only reason i had to leave was on medicle ground, i served on HMS Tireless S88 and HMS Trafalgar S108 as a TSM warfare rating (tactical submarine warfare department)
VolvoFH12580 4 years ago
Yes it is.
Richiepookinshoo 3 years ago
i especially like the scene with the c-130 gear retracting
janblanc 4 years ago
the best is a SUBway!!!
nolimit909 4 years ago
ignorant mother fucker.
ruikmaxdo 4 years ago
""It is difficult to find the most advanced Russian Akula class submarines when they operate at tactical speed or less," Admiral Jeremy Boorda said.
Also, another US Admiral, E.A. Burkhalter said the Akula was quieter than the Seaworlf
thoood9000 4 years ago
no burkhalter did not say anything like that you stupid fuck. the seawolf is not only quieter, it can hear a hell of a lot better than the akula!
22steve5150 4 years ago
22steve5150 is correct.
Richiepookinshoo 4 years ago
No nuclear submarine is quieter than the Seawolf, or can hear nearly as well. I don't know where you got your information.
beserk23456 3 years ago
Where do you get your information from then mr expert?
Longs81 3 years ago
Don't be ridiculous. Akula II class submarines are quieter than 688i class submarines. Learning before writing is a good habit, especially if u don't want to look like an idiot. In the other hand, 688i's sonar systems are better than Akula's sonar systems, so probably they will detect each other at the same time in a supposed meeting.
nitmarauder 4 years ago
.... The Virginia class don´t carry tridents, its an attack submarine not a slbm carrier. And there isn´t any submarine in existence that can carry so much tridents... LOL
C0mr4d3 4 years ago
Funny, But once again this is just complete and utter russian bullshit. They would never be able to get their boats in the water let alone track one of our boats with just an akula.
csgroves757 4 years ago
latest Trafalgar Class is quietest submarine in the world
downapub 4 years ago
no its not, seawolf and virginia tied with the collins class a very close competitor
22steve5150 4 years ago
Actually, since the Trafalgar class is a Nuclear sub it cant be the worlds quietest sub. even if it is ever so slight, the hiss of nuclear reactors is white noise, nigh impossible to cancel out. While it might be the quietest nuclear submarine, conventional submarines running on Batteries or fuel cells are a lot quieter. But then again, conventional subs have other drawbacks.
Benjamin82watches 4 years ago 2
Jojo, russia are the best!
Jushniykray 4 years ago
the moment the topedo hits the ship,crap!
MiddleGroundCaptor 4 years ago
a type 65 torpedo will destroy even a nimitz carrier in one shot
vKmann 4 years ago
well, a us admiral did say that akula 2 is more silent than a seawolf ...
vKmann 4 years ago
absolute russian bullshit. no US navy admiral ever said any such thing. stupid russians, your best shit is about as silent as a 688I, and even then your shit cant hear as good as ours.
22steve5150 4 years ago
dangit, how did an Akula kill a Seawolf? impossible.
RedFoxAce 4 years ago
ugly
crackers43 5 years ago
Video Inacurat but cool
mantech2 5 years ago
Coast guard would have nothing to do with a sub search and destroy. Russians would use SIERRA II, not akula. And shkval might be better choice than SET-65.But shkval is obviously russian, if they didn't care who new, they would use OSCAR II and guided missles. Either way, video is wrong.
vodkaIstme 5 years ago
temaaa
bartsonat 5 years ago
Man, you haven't understand this!!! Russian submarine wasn't sunk at all!! Russian sub destroys that radar plus an US sub on the way home. Akulas capitan after gets a medal from the President.
nableena 5 years ago
cool
ljpacey 5 years ago
lame
blitzkriegmann 5 years ago
Hujnja...
4elovek 5 years ago