Nepotism is absolutely rife in Ireland...and especially in the Irish parliament, where so often politicians are the sons, daughters, nephews, cousins, etc. of other politicians (and obviously useless, to boot). It's absolutely sickening, and won't change any time soon, that's for sure.
3:10, ditto screenplays. I see the garbage that gets put over the screen and wonder how the hell it go up there. Meanwhile, people love the hell out of my script, but never sees light of day on any producer's desk. BRAVO Network! Great movie.
Are you gay, Jewish, Scientologist, or Freemason? Because those are the groups who control Hollywood. Cynically I would say that you'll have to find a group of cameramen and production people on your own, and then get a private financial backer.
This is simply awesome. I've just recently been on a big research kick on nepotism, and I am learning more than I wish I ever had. It a true underlying cancer in this world. You would assume, at first glance, that the whole idea behind nepotism is "good"....but upon further glance........there are some very horrible horrible consequences.
I contend that it's ethnic nepotism that is the biggest problem -- ethnic nepotism is HUGE in this world, and it's so huge because, since the civil rights era, everybody has learned how to both hide their ethnicism well AND how to turbo-charge it beyond belief.
it is true,it begins first of all with Holwood artists,when they recognise the movies benefts.now is going to president Mubark of Egypt and his son Gamal.
Did you know that 2 out of 3 forbes billionaires started from scratch some came out of poverty? I would say that chances for mobility are still pretty high in the United States. I don't quite agree with this video
Sir, can you tell me some movies or documentaries that could further explain your views on nepotism. I liked the video much and wishes to know more on how nepotism controls the world. Thanks a lot.
Excellent video! I completely agree with you, nepotism is a huge driving force in the US and our world. It sucks, and I don't respect those who practice it.
What this means is that the war is not won and equality is not here. We are close, however i think a revolution against the super wealthy is in order and an equal distribution of wealth is needed. You don't think its possible? Right now it isn't that's what a revolution is for. To kick down there door and share the spoils equally. I think there's some dirty laundry "they" are hiding also. What a Utopian idea!
Personally, I don't believe in any static state of perfection but, rather, an ongoing dynamic of regularly whittling down injustice, not unlike how a rodent always needs to be chewing on something hard, to keep its ever-growing teeth from causing itself permanent injury.
Like it or not, the narcissistic sociopaths who economically antagonize society onward may likely have their place, but it's not a role that I think they have any conscious self-restraint about, so it has to be imposed.
@TheLogicJunkie People has always been political in as much as they will even lie to themselves in order to further their own agenda including close "friends". Money has always been the means to establish and stabilize an empire of either explicit or covert slavery or domination. This will never change until we get rid of empires in favor of something else. Note, all nations in the world are empires except for the few hunter/gatherer tribes left. Perhaps Venus Project can offer an alternative.
like that Drudge guy who got kicked off Fox News his old show The Drudge Report. he still is a somewhat relevant figure in the media because he does his job well and the people he hires to help him do their job well.
I myself have been tryiong to devise a way to blackmail powerful figures in politics and entertainment without making myself a target and unfortunately I have not quite yet come up with a fullproof scheme but damnit I am working on it. If that doesnt work it will have to be selling drugs, gambling, and robberies of drug dealers or somethin because I refuse to take the college route or kiss ass. We all must come up with our own American Scheme.
A great way to counteract nepotism is blackmail and extortion etc. You see people on t.v. sometimes and you think how the hell is he/she still on the air *cough cough Larry King cough cough* and you have to ask yourself, how are they still on the air or considered relevant and the only conclusion is that they must have some major dirt on someone in the industry.
You're really onto something there: the possession of potential blackmail info does seem to be the fastest means to power in this world... at least to the extent that power is determined through social endorsement.
Why do you think these "secret societies" produce such influential people? It's because they have deliberately incorporated rites within their walls that are so taboo as to inspire lifelong bonds of loyalty, if only to ensure that everyone keeps the secrets.
Interesting thread. Nepotism isn't only a problem with government or acting - it's also a problem in the financial community.
One of the hidden costs of too much nepotism is that it kills the morale of all the people who are trying to build their businesses the old fashioned way.
The other thing about Nepotism is that their is a code of political correctness which discourages people from talking about it. This is the liberal PC conservatives usually rail against. This is conservative PC.
After all, why work hard to try and make money when the concept of true merit is actually deeply and profoundly hated by the nepotists, because it opposes their way of life?
Why should we ever trust our banking or trading systems ever again, when we're just going to be betrayed by the entrenched uber-buddy clique anyway?
Why bother producing anything at all? Why bother even participating in the economy?
"Why bother even participating in the economy anyway?"
Well,cause you dont wanna end up like so many of us black people.Thats basicly what gangbangin & hustlin is.Self governance,self employment,self policing.But of course that is illegal & will result in your ultimate demise.
Well, let me ask you this: What do you really think is going on in "acceptable" and "legal" white-dominated corporate-governmental culture the world over, if not merely some variation on gang-bangin' and hustlin'?
Yet these folks are able to get away with it, because they've established their versions of those 'hood activities as the standard that everyone must accept and calibrate their morality around.
The laws of physics and nature are essentially "might makes right", but when's enough?
Are you really going to tell me that CIA-orchestrated overthrows and assassinations are anything other than gang-bangin'?
What is the predatory promotion of toxic mainstream pharmaceuticals, if not hustlin'? What about the manufacture of intentionally-defective products, as well as planned obsolescence? Are these not examples of hustlin'?
So, while I understand that these things may be illegal, please don't tell me that the legal forms are any more "right" than the illegal forms.
you are so right. do a search on the "13 banking families." they are basically what some consider the "shadow government" and currently are driving the world economy in hopes of redistributing ALL the wealth of the world into these 13 families and control us with a one-world govt. it will be the EU, African Union, Asion Union (is coming) and north american union---is already in effect, research it, but they havent told us yet. we need to learn the true history of humans, who and what we are.
Yeah... there was an incident about 20 years ago at Duke University, where a guy in his 30's had apparently been passing himself off as a fraternity student named "Maurice de Rothschild" for quite some time, and living quite fat and sassy on the generous gifts from other students.
Eventually, however, he was found out, and, after a schoolwide scandal in the newspapers, was never heard from again.
Well, I'm not entirely sure that the "majority rules, no matter what" philosophy of democracy is the answer, either...
I still like the idea of a truly constitutional republic, where a set of rules is actually followed AS WRITTEN, and where people can elect a "representative public" -- a "republic" -- to manage the affairs of government.
Beyond that, however, I think that the actual limitations of gov't powers should be very close to what people like Ayn Rand and Ron Paul advocate.
you are so right. there is a lad at work who's dad is the area manager, he himself is a manager. not that strange you think. the lad in question killed someone through drink driving and was sentenced to three years in prison. he is a convict. do you think if that was me would i get a job. no way!
You're probably right. You always run the risk of living under a glass ceiling whenever you work in any organization, but especially in private enterprise.
Sorry friend, but that is just imagination. No truth behind it. I suggest you quit and take up a job that will teach you something meaningful and you will like to do. OR buy a farm and live off of it by yourself. This notion that a bunch of families are controlling the world is plain and simple - imagination.
By the way, I just checked out your "favorite" videos, and I couldn't help notice all the pro-Ron Paul videos. I have to say that I'm pretty confused as to why someone who so identifies with the pro-liberty ideology of Ron Paul would then turn around and have such a hostile reaction towards someone like me, who is essentially advocating the same thing.
No my friend there is a whole lot of difference. While it is true that power rules the world - whoever hold power rules, there still exists a balance of power between the powerful and the rest. That being said, yes, the way things are upward mobility is seriously difficult in this day and age. But we don't need any more theories about oppressors, hidden govt etc. Regardless of all and any that might exist, we ought to get the people to be vigilant (not hateful) of the political system.
Thank you for the thoughtful and thorough reply, but I take exception to your attempting to issue a cosmic dictum that "we don't need any more theories about oppressors, hidden govt., etc".
I'm not sure the rest of the human race would appreciate your substituting your own opinions for the rest of humanity's. Now, if YOU think you don't need any more theories... etc., etc., that's one thing, but this "we" business is a bit autocratic.
With that said, I think you do have a very important, implicit, point, which is essentially to "accentuate the positive", rather than the negative.
However, I think that both are required because, until you also address that which you rightfully should hate (in the noblest sense of that now-untrendy word), you don't know what to, at the very least, move away from.
You have to first admit what you hate, before you can ever summon the mental focus to at least go elsewhere.
Well, then, if you can't see the need for an emotion which is appropriate to motivating you to have a critical, aversive reaction to that which seeks your enslavement and destruction, I can only advise you to consult a neurologist. This seems like a medical problem to me.
Did I say there isn't a need for an emotion? While you are right, its inappropriate for me to use "we", you are way off. The first thing you need as a libertarian is trust in yourself as an individual. All you are doing is building another 'us vs them' paradigm. If we were that gullible, we will not be able to be responsible for ourselves either. Liberty has a great component of taking responsibility, somehow your perspective is invested more in blame than personal responsibility.
Look, mate, while I value your optimism and belief in courage, I've done far more than most in my life to work hard and play by the rules and, these many years later, with my life in shambles from all the smiling, soft-spoken phonies who schemed so well to earn my trust, I'm all done waving the flag and naively living my life any more like it's a civics lesson from some mass-market textbook for suckers.
This world is made by sociopaths, for sociopaths. Hatred is the only sane emotion here.
And this is not to say that hatred dictates that you "go postal" but, at the very least, it compels you to get the hell away from, and shun, all those corrupt things in life that absolutely should be understood as hateful and loathsome.
Your pretty much describing what others would call the New World Order. I am sure you know that though :o) Or is this kinda the same but a little different in your opinion?
A perverse version of the destruction of humanity - you are to right ... you are right the blind see further and the deaf do hear ... corporations (killers) Bayer is a an illusive Forth Reich one of the gods of the new age and true family is dead put our kids in daycare and parents in old folk homes ... bunch of lemmings were are watch out for the cliff keeper . back to basics baby ... Sharon Stone belongs to Mensa that say it all "Nepotism" who is your family? Keep on being pissed and thinking
Thanks... I just had to say this stuff. I may likely end up shot or something for letting the poisons in the mud hatch out, but I just can't take it anymore.
No offense pal but you are a master of the obvious along with delusional feelings of self importance and paranoia.
Some of the things you say are true and some of it is simply tin foil helmut stuff but either way some guy on youtube making vague assertions is not important enough for anyone to notice or care much less be bothered enough to kill you for it.....lol
I'm a "master of the obvious", which means that what I've said is obvious. That is, to be obvious, it has to be visible to everyone, it has to be true and existing.
In effect, then, you're saying that what I'm saying is so true, it's obvious.
Yet, after admitting that what I say is true but, only begrudgingly, within the insult "master of the obvious", you then turn around and try to say I'm so wrong as to be "paranoid"... in other words, "insane".
So, which is it, now that you've shown yourself to be maliciously self-contradicting?
Also, you say that my "vague assertions" are not important enough for "anyone" to notice. Yet, ironically, here you are, commenting on them, albeit in a strategically dismissive manner.
Help me understand then, "pal"... If my comments are so unimportant as to not be worth noticing, how did you notice them, in order to comment on them? "Anyone" implies any member of the set of "everyone", i.e., you.
Beyond even this, how can you call yourself a "conservative atheist"? That seems the very embodiment of a contradiction, in and of itself.
After all, the conservative platform is itself centered around religion... specifically, the Christian -- and, more specifically, the Christian Protestant -- religion.
I don't see how you can both renounce religion, and yet advocate conservatism. It's the very embodiment of an internally divided self-contradiction.
I don't think you'll get shot for saying these things. Not because they're not true, but because not enough people believe what you say in order for you to be considered a threat. However, I'd also like to say you shouldn't cause your faithful subscribers needless worry by failing to post videos for a large length of time. lol [:
Be advised, however, that there are quite a lot of people who don't need any more reason to shoot you, other than the fact that it just makes them feel good to kill.
As politely as I can say it, while you or I might enjoy beer or lying in a hammock, they enjoy cutting a throat or spraying an unsuspecting, defenseless person's brains all over the place.
In other words, there are many people who enjoy killing and terrorizing, just for recreational exercise and casual amusement.
Nepotism is absolutely rife in Ireland...and especially in the Irish parliament, where so often politicians are the sons, daughters, nephews, cousins, etc. of other politicians (and obviously useless, to boot). It's absolutely sickening, and won't change any time soon, that's for sure.
MrAlban003 1 month ago
Well, maybe it's a big reason why Ireland can't seem to get out from under its economic doldrums...
TheLogicJunkie 1 month ago
nicely done - easily understood -
MANDYTHEALPHADOG 2 months ago
3:10, ditto screenplays. I see the garbage that gets put over the screen and wonder how the hell it go up there. Meanwhile, people love the hell out of my script, but never sees light of day on any producer's desk. BRAVO Network! Great movie.
Wargoat6 6 months ago
Are you gay, Jewish, Scientologist, or Freemason? Because those are the groups who control Hollywood. Cynically I would say that you'll have to find a group of cameramen and production people on your own, and then get a private financial backer.
TheLogicJunkie 6 months ago
This is simply awesome. I've just recently been on a big research kick on nepotism, and I am learning more than I wish I ever had. It a true underlying cancer in this world. You would assume, at first glance, that the whole idea behind nepotism is "good"....but upon further glance........there are some very horrible horrible consequences.
chewface 7 months ago
I contend that it's ethnic nepotism that is the biggest problem -- ethnic nepotism is HUGE in this world, and it's so huge because, since the civil rights era, everybody has learned how to both hide their ethnicism well AND how to turbo-charge it beyond belief.
TheLogicJunkie 7 months ago
Welcome to statism.
Esoparagon 10 months ago
Great video, Thanks.
MrJuno6 11 months ago
it is true,it begins first of all with Holwood artists,when they recognise the movies benefts.now is going to president Mubark of Egypt and his son Gamal.
MrSakkrr 1 year ago
Waking up from the American Dream.
pantoum 1 year ago
Did you know that 2 out of 3 forbes billionaires started from scratch some came out of poverty? I would say that chances for mobility are still pretty high in the United States. I don't quite agree with this video
hendogga032888 1 year ago
Sir, can you tell me some movies or documentaries that could further explain your views on nepotism. I liked the video much and wishes to know more on how nepotism controls the world. Thanks a lot.
lordlyndonmedina 2 years ago
kinda remeinds me of the bush familiy and the sabbies-_-
RiVa667 2 years ago
Osama. Bin. Laden. Why hasn't he been caught? I think this video does more to answer the question, without even raising it.
jagruger 2 years ago
Good point. He's an old family friend, is why.
TheLogicJunkie 2 years ago
You sir, have hit the nail on the head! Well done!
baronvonhirsch 3 years ago
Why thank ya.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
Excellent video! I completely agree with you, nepotism is a huge driving force in the US and our world. It sucks, and I don't respect those who practice it.
starone091705 3 years ago 7
Thanks for saying so...
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
What this means is that the war is not won and equality is not here. We are close, however i think a revolution against the super wealthy is in order and an equal distribution of wealth is needed. You don't think its possible? Right now it isn't that's what a revolution is for. To kick down there door and share the spoils equally. I think there's some dirty laundry "they" are hiding also. What a Utopian idea!
motleycruesader 3 years ago
Personally, I don't believe in any static state of perfection but, rather, an ongoing dynamic of regularly whittling down injustice, not unlike how a rodent always needs to be chewing on something hard, to keep its ever-growing teeth from causing itself permanent injury.
Like it or not, the narcissistic sociopaths who economically antagonize society onward may likely have their place, but it's not a role that I think they have any conscious self-restraint about, so it has to be imposed.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
@TheLogicJunkie People has always been political in as much as they will even lie to themselves in order to further their own agenda including close "friends". Money has always been the means to establish and stabilize an empire of either explicit or covert slavery or domination. This will never change until we get rid of empires in favor of something else. Note, all nations in the world are empires except for the few hunter/gatherer tribes left. Perhaps Venus Project can offer an alternative.
technatezin 1 year ago
like that Drudge guy who got kicked off Fox News his old show The Drudge Report. he still is a somewhat relevant figure in the media because he does his job well and the people he hires to help him do their job well.
Donkeyhawk 3 years ago
I myself have been tryiong to devise a way to blackmail powerful figures in politics and entertainment without making myself a target and unfortunately I have not quite yet come up with a fullproof scheme but damnit I am working on it. If that doesnt work it will have to be selling drugs, gambling, and robberies of drug dealers or somethin because I refuse to take the college route or kiss ass. We all must come up with our own American Scheme.
Donkeyhawk 3 years ago
A great way to counteract nepotism is blackmail and extortion etc. You see people on t.v. sometimes and you think how the hell is he/she still on the air *cough cough Larry King cough cough* and you have to ask yourself, how are they still on the air or considered relevant and the only conclusion is that they must have some major dirt on someone in the industry.
Donkeyhawk 3 years ago
You're really onto something there: the possession of potential blackmail info does seem to be the fastest means to power in this world... at least to the extent that power is determined through social endorsement.
Why do you think these "secret societies" produce such influential people? It's because they have deliberately incorporated rites within their walls that are so taboo as to inspire lifelong bonds of loyalty, if only to ensure that everyone keeps the secrets.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
Interesting thread. Nepotism isn't only a problem with government or acting - it's also a problem in the financial community.
One of the hidden costs of too much nepotism is that it kills the morale of all the people who are trying to build their businesses the old fashioned way.
The other thing about Nepotism is that their is a code of political correctness which discourages people from talking about it. This is the liberal PC conservatives usually rail against. This is conservative PC.
Masonv96 3 years ago
Great point.
After all, why work hard to try and make money when the concept of true merit is actually deeply and profoundly hated by the nepotists, because it opposes their way of life?
Why should we ever trust our banking or trading systems ever again, when we're just going to be betrayed by the entrenched uber-buddy clique anyway?
Why bother producing anything at all? Why bother even participating in the economy?
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
TheLogicJunkie:
"Why bother even participating in the economy anyway?"
Well,cause you dont wanna end up like so many of us black people.Thats basicly what gangbangin & hustlin is.Self governance,self employment,self policing.But of course that is illegal & will result in your ultimate demise.
youngdrodeau 3 years ago
Well, let me ask you this: What do you really think is going on in "acceptable" and "legal" white-dominated corporate-governmental culture the world over, if not merely some variation on gang-bangin' and hustlin'?
Yet these folks are able to get away with it, because they've established their versions of those 'hood activities as the standard that everyone must accept and calibrate their morality around.
The laws of physics and nature are essentially "might makes right", but when's enough?
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
Are you really going to tell me that CIA-orchestrated overthrows and assassinations are anything other than gang-bangin'?
What is the predatory promotion of toxic mainstream pharmaceuticals, if not hustlin'? What about the manufacture of intentionally-defective products, as well as planned obsolescence? Are these not examples of hustlin'?
So, while I understand that these things may be illegal, please don't tell me that the legal forms are any more "right" than the illegal forms.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
The only thing that seems to matter is the power of the particular mafia that sets the rules.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
Gwenyth Paltrow - good actress, not great, and not oscar-deserving.
father - producer
mother - actress
good family friend - steven spielberg
jude1871 3 years ago
Lets not forget Brooke Hogan.
I live in Los Angeles and I can tell you, "neponomics" IS the overwhelming reality here. Especially in the entertainment industry.
LeftLiberalSoCal 3 years ago
you are so right. do a search on the "13 banking families." they are basically what some consider the "shadow government" and currently are driving the world economy in hopes of redistributing ALL the wealth of the world into these 13 families and control us with a one-world govt. it will be the EU, African Union, Asion Union (is coming) and north american union---is already in effect, research it, but they havent told us yet. we need to learn the true history of humans, who and what we are.
lunalasnan 3 years ago
Yeah... there was an incident about 20 years ago at Duke University, where a guy in his 30's had apparently been passing himself off as a fraternity student named "Maurice de Rothschild" for quite some time, and living quite fat and sassy on the generous gifts from other students.
Eventually, however, he was found out, and, after a schoolwide scandal in the newspapers, was never heard from again.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
This has gone on for as long as man has existed. It corrupts a democracy. When too few people control resources and wealth, democracy is lost.
demonmax75 3 years ago
Well, I'm not entirely sure that the "majority rules, no matter what" philosophy of democracy is the answer, either...
I still like the idea of a truly constitutional republic, where a set of rules is actually followed AS WRITTEN, and where people can elect a "representative public" -- a "republic" -- to manage the affairs of government.
Beyond that, however, I think that the actual limitations of gov't powers should be very close to what people like Ayn Rand and Ron Paul advocate.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
you are so right. there is a lad at work who's dad is the area manager, he himself is a manager. not that strange you think. the lad in question killed someone through drink driving and was sentenced to three years in prison. he is a convict. do you think if that was me would i get a job. no way!
bminternet43 3 years ago 4
You're probably right. You always run the risk of living under a glass ceiling whenever you work in any organization, but especially in private enterprise.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
Sorry friend, but that is just imagination. No truth behind it. I suggest you quit and take up a job that will teach you something meaningful and you will like to do. OR buy a farm and live off of it by yourself. This notion that a bunch of families are controlling the world is plain and simple - imagination.
utubehayter 3 years ago
Noted.
No truth whatsoever. All just fantasy.
Thanks for the clarification.
By the way, I just checked out your "favorite" videos, and I couldn't help notice all the pro-Ron Paul videos. I have to say that I'm pretty confused as to why someone who so identifies with the pro-liberty ideology of Ron Paul would then turn around and have such a hostile reaction towards someone like me, who is essentially advocating the same thing.
Oh well.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
No my friend there is a whole lot of difference. While it is true that power rules the world - whoever hold power rules, there still exists a balance of power between the powerful and the rest. That being said, yes, the way things are upward mobility is seriously difficult in this day and age. But we don't need any more theories about oppressors, hidden govt etc. Regardless of all and any that might exist, we ought to get the people to be vigilant (not hateful) of the political system.
utubehayter 3 years ago
Thank you for the thoughtful and thorough reply, but I take exception to your attempting to issue a cosmic dictum that "we don't need any more theories about oppressors, hidden govt., etc".
I'm not sure the rest of the human race would appreciate your substituting your own opinions for the rest of humanity's. Now, if YOU think you don't need any more theories... etc., etc., that's one thing, but this "we" business is a bit autocratic.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
With that said, I think you do have a very important, implicit, point, which is essentially to "accentuate the positive", rather than the negative.
However, I think that both are required because, until you also address that which you rightfully should hate (in the noblest sense of that now-untrendy word), you don't know what to, at the very least, move away from.
You have to first admit what you hate, before you can ever summon the mental focus to at least go elsewhere.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
No no.. first you need to identify the need to hate. I just don't see one.
utubehayter 3 years ago
Well, then, if you can't see the need for an emotion which is appropriate to motivating you to have a critical, aversive reaction to that which seeks your enslavement and destruction, I can only advise you to consult a neurologist. This seems like a medical problem to me.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
Did I say there isn't a need for an emotion? While you are right, its inappropriate for me to use "we", you are way off. The first thing you need as a libertarian is trust in yourself as an individual. All you are doing is building another 'us vs them' paradigm. If we were that gullible, we will not be able to be responsible for ourselves either. Liberty has a great component of taking responsibility, somehow your perspective is invested more in blame than personal responsibility.
utubehayter 3 years ago
Look, mate, while I value your optimism and belief in courage, I've done far more than most in my life to work hard and play by the rules and, these many years later, with my life in shambles from all the smiling, soft-spoken phonies who schemed so well to earn my trust, I'm all done waving the flag and naively living my life any more like it's a civics lesson from some mass-market textbook for suckers.
This world is made by sociopaths, for sociopaths. Hatred is the only sane emotion here.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
And this is not to say that hatred dictates that you "go postal" but, at the very least, it compels you to get the hell away from, and shun, all those corrupt things in life that absolutely should be understood as hateful and loathsome.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
Your pretty much describing what others would call the New World Order. I am sure you know that though :o) Or is this kinda the same but a little different in your opinion?
JadedIllusions27 3 years ago
A perverse version of the destruction of humanity - you are to right ... you are right the blind see further and the deaf do hear ... corporations (killers) Bayer is a an illusive Forth Reich one of the gods of the new age and true family is dead put our kids in daycare and parents in old folk homes ... bunch of lemmings were are watch out for the cliff keeper . back to basics baby ... Sharon Stone belongs to Mensa that say it all "Nepotism" who is your family? Keep on being pissed and thinking
jodyrea 3 years ago
jodyrea; You are so right when you say "The TRUE FAMILY is dead",( With day care and old folks homes etc)
RustyGatesJr 3 years ago
It's mortifying that the elderly aren't being used as repositories of wisdom any more but, rather, are too often being regarded as burdens.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
SO VERY TRUE. There are so many talented people out there getting no recognition while crap is shoved down our throats.
...And your point about the families that rule everything is right on the money.
montaramike 3 years ago
Thanks... I just had to say this stuff. I may likely end up shot or something for letting the poisons in the mud hatch out, but I just can't take it anymore.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
Not much can be done, we are pretty much powerless, and they know it.
montaramike 3 years ago
No offense pal but you are a master of the obvious along with delusional feelings of self importance and paranoia.
Some of the things you say are true and some of it is simply tin foil helmut stuff but either way some guy on youtube making vague assertions is not important enough for anyone to notice or care much less be bothered enough to kill you for it.....lol
ConservativeAtheist 3 years ago
So... let me get this straight.
I'm a "master of the obvious", which means that what I've said is obvious. That is, to be obvious, it has to be visible to everyone, it has to be true and existing.
In effect, then, you're saying that what I'm saying is so true, it's obvious.
Yet, after admitting that what I say is true but, only begrudgingly, within the insult "master of the obvious", you then turn around and try to say I'm so wrong as to be "paranoid"... in other words, "insane".
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
So, which is it, now that you've shown yourself to be maliciously self-contradicting?
Also, you say that my "vague assertions" are not important enough for "anyone" to notice. Yet, ironically, here you are, commenting on them, albeit in a strategically dismissive manner.
Help me understand then, "pal"... If my comments are so unimportant as to not be worth noticing, how did you notice them, in order to comment on them? "Anyone" implies any member of the set of "everyone", i.e., you.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
Beyond even this, how can you call yourself a "conservative atheist"? That seems the very embodiment of a contradiction, in and of itself.
After all, the conservative platform is itself centered around religion... specifically, the Christian -- and, more specifically, the Christian Protestant -- religion.
I don't see how you can both renounce religion, and yet advocate conservatism. It's the very embodiment of an internally divided self-contradiction.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago
I don't think you'll get shot for saying these things. Not because they're not true, but because not enough people believe what you say in order for you to be considered a threat. However, I'd also like to say you shouldn't cause your faithful subscribers needless worry by failing to post videos for a large length of time. lol [:
Saedin 3 years ago
Hahahaha
Be advised, however, that there are quite a lot of people who don't need any more reason to shoot you, other than the fact that it just makes them feel good to kill.
As politely as I can say it, while you or I might enjoy beer or lying in a hammock, they enjoy cutting a throat or spraying an unsuspecting, defenseless person's brains all over the place.
In other words, there are many people who enjoy killing and terrorizing, just for recreational exercise and casual amusement.
TheLogicJunkie 3 years ago