mr1001nights should be the one to have done this interview buddhagem is a feminist idiot who doesnt understand that feminism also keeps the capitalist agenda moving around and around.
"If you are a serious revolutionary, and you are not looking for an autocratic revolution but a popular one which will move towards freedom and democracy, you wanna have the mass of the population implementing this revolution and carrying it out and solving problems and so on. And they're not gonna do it until they have discovered for themselves that there are limits to reform. So a sensible revolutionary will try to push reform to the limit."
Capitalism is the historic evolution of private property relationship of alienation,exploitation and suffering of humanity in a modality of commodity production for abstract process of capital accumulation and concentration . A system of wage slavery in an employment system of suppression and dehumanistion. We need to transcend this false limits to our creative cooperative energies for a moneyless,classless,stateless communities of humanity . Capitalism is evil
That's what I mean. We don't to reform the 18th amendment, we need to ABOLISH it. Reformation isn't saying get rid of a law. It's saying tweak the vocabulary. That's what happened to slavery. You had reformist and abolitionist. Reformist said slavery would always be there, so I suppose the least we can do is improve slave conditions. Abolitionists saw through the bullshit. What I mean is those wishy washing moderate liberal Democrats who think health care reform actually reformed healthcare.
I just don't understand how this guy gets anything done. He mustn't have any research responsibilities anymore. He spends his whole day giving interviews.
And it's not like he's saying anything he hasn't already said a thousand times.
i love how in the fantasy world these 2 douchebags live in anarchy means totalitarianism and freedom means either forcing people to do things or everyone just magically agreeing on what to do.
For djboony: This is not true at all. Everybody in politics believes they are doing good in one way or another. But not everybody in politics is causing great inhumanity. There are political activsts today who claim to do good, but promote hate and war. And there are political activsts who also claim to do good, but they promote peace and love. And visions of spectacular beauty are not a prelude to barbarism at all. It depends on what people find beautiful. Preferences are often created by TV.
For djboony: Not everyone of the crooks thinks they are doing good, some of them are aware that they are stealing from the planet, but they don't care, they have no conscience. But I guess most of them kid themselves into believing that they are doing good things. I have seen it how some people twist the facts in their minds to feel better about what they are doing. This is what a corrupt mind is. That's why strong positive and some strict incentives are necessary in a political system.
Why can't people move out of the big cities? Why did they stay? People can stand up peacefully and say no to oppression of any sort. They can walk out. They can move to less populated areas and homestead land and build simple homes. Today there is only one solution to the world's crisis, and that is becoming localized and simple in our life styles. The largest problem in our society is that people want what they see on TV, they want what is portrayed as important. But it is really not important.
Considering he's 80 years old and his wife of 60 years just died, he's looking fantastic. If I'd put that kind of work in for as long as he has, I'd be dead.
How lame can you be? Grammer checking YouTube entries and coming to a conclusion on education level by that. I wonder what kind of education you have.
@3:00 -3:50 - I assume that Chomsky, when speaking about changing institutions, is talking about violent change after reform does not align the governent with popular attitudes. Also, he argues strongly in favor of legitimate authority. At what point do people have the legitimate authority to use violence against the state?
Health care - 45-50 million Amercans go without.. Would this make it legitimate to use force if reforms are not passed? What type of force?
@leeason1 No he's a hypocrite in many ways who still manages to care about the poor by working tirelessly to spread information that you could not hope to receive through any mainstream news giant.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Reagan is the man. He stuck a knive in the labor moment. God Bless his soul. I hope Chomsky can do something instead of living his whole life in a University. No wonder he's so wishy washy and unreal. All the things he stands on are unrealistic fantasies.
I guess the young liberal college kids love him. O well they'll grow up.
don't worry about things like education, that doesn't concern people like you. Just leave these discussions to people with average intelligence and above.
I have rarely heard Chomsky discuss changing institutions and regimes, especially the US, and the argument of using coercion as self-defense is really astounding
@CapitalistHolocaust Yeah because it's not like Stalin invaded all of the Baltic states in the USSR or anything. Yeah, communism never used force, LOL.
I don't think this is a very radical position -certainly no more so than the "whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends (i.e. life, liberty, persuit of happiness), it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it" in the U.S. constitution. Note that he only advocates coercion where (when?) existing institutions do not admit reform.
True, but Chomsky, from my understanding, tends towards peaceful solutions. He is not a pacifist but does not talk often (I have actually never heard him before) discuss when coercion is acceptable. Given his argument that authority must justify itself, and most people would argue that the authority to use coercion should have the highest threashold, he actually provides a fairly easy litmus test for the use of coercion. You are right - he is consistent with Thomas Jefferson and DofI.
mr1001nights should be the one to have done this interview buddhagem is a feminist idiot who doesnt understand that feminism also keeps the capitalist agenda moving around and around.
themaniusedtob 7 months ago
"If you are a serious revolutionary, and you are not looking for an autocratic revolution but a popular one which will move towards freedom and democracy, you wanna have the mass of the population implementing this revolution and carrying it out and solving problems and so on. And they're not gonna do it until they have discovered for themselves that there are limits to reform. So a sensible revolutionary will try to push reform to the limit."
johnnysecular 8 months ago
I just want to hug noam chomsky he seems like such a great old guy
allanps1979 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Capitalism is the historic evolution of private property relationship of alienation,exploitation and suffering of humanity in a modality of commodity production for abstract process of capital accumulation and concentration . A system of wage slavery in an employment system of suppression and dehumanistion. We need to transcend this false limits to our creative cooperative energies for a moneyless,classless,stateless communities of humanity . Capitalism is evil
arzoyan 1 year ago
That's what I mean. We don't to reform the 18th amendment, we need to ABOLISH it. Reformation isn't saying get rid of a law. It's saying tweak the vocabulary. That's what happened to slavery. You had reformist and abolitionist. Reformist said slavery would always be there, so I suppose the least we can do is improve slave conditions. Abolitionists saw through the bullshit. What I mean is those wishy washing moderate liberal Democrats who think health care reform actually reformed healthcare.
Gettinghitonattheban 1 year ago
Great interview with a truly great thinker. Thanks for posting this.
leland61 1 year ago
the Bavarian Illuminati, an Enlightenment-era secret society founded on May 1, 1776
Bolshevik Revolution October 1917- ??????
matsutakneatche 1 year ago
Reformation is masturbation. It's simply the state's why of putting more obligations onto it's subjects. It's a mere accommodation.
Gettinghitonattheban 1 year ago
I just don't understand how this guy gets anything done. He mustn't have any research responsibilities anymore. He spends his whole day giving interviews.
And it's not like he's saying anything he hasn't already said a thousand times.
beejusbeejus 2 years ago
Wow, this is a rare find: an interview with Noam Chomsky!
beejusbeejus 2 years ago
is that sarcasm?
Chomskyan 2 years ago
nothin' but
lol :)
beejusbeejus 2 years ago
Wow...his office looks a lot like mine. HIs books are as unorganized and scattered as mine are. Now I don't feel so bad...heh.
Great interview, Dave.
Mechelle68 2 years ago
oiuoiu988 is just a troll who spends his days spamming videos with copy and paste slogans. Block him and forget him.
getplaning 2 years ago
You cannot change a closed mind.
realizerealitynow 2 years ago
i love how in the fantasy world these 2 douchebags live in anarchy means totalitarianism and freedom means either forcing people to do things or everyone just magically agreeing on what to do.
Great Job!
oiuoiu988 2 years ago
wow, a video of two morons talking about their conspiracy theories. chomsky looks like he's almost dead, thats awesome.
oiuoiu988 2 years ago
which part of it was about conspiracy theories? I missed that.
Chomskyan 2 years ago
the part about how your boss and your landlord are your oppressors, dont act like you dont know.
oiuoiu988 2 years ago
that's just institutional analysis. maybe you don't know the difference?
Chomskyan 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hahaha. ok have fun with your imaginary class war!
PANTENE FOR EVERYONE!!!
right??
oiuoiu988 2 years ago
why not.
have fun trolling.
Chomskyan 2 years ago
one man's trolling is another man's quest to find the person who will prove him wrong or change his mind...
oiuoiu988 2 years ago
Imaginary class war? What world do you live in? Ingnorance is bliss , apparently.
99missingperson99 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its called reality...
i was a leftist when i was your age too.
oiuoiu988 2 years ago
"If you get to a point where the existing institutions simply will not bend to the popular will, well you've got to eliminate the institutions."
~ Noam Chomsky
DefenceSpeech 2 years ago 6
Thanks for posting this!
Keep it up.
peterfdrucker 2 years ago 2
For confederalsocialist: Why? Can you explain this more specifically?
redwoodforesttwo 2 years ago
he means a man who belives he is doing good is capable of great inhumanity. every tyrant in history belived he was doing good by his fellow man
djboony 2 years ago 2
For djboony: This is not true at all. Everybody in politics believes they are doing good in one way or another. But not everybody in politics is causing great inhumanity. There are political activsts today who claim to do good, but promote hate and war. And there are political activsts who also claim to do good, but they promote peace and love. And visions of spectacular beauty are not a prelude to barbarism at all. It depends on what people find beautiful. Preferences are often created by TV.
redwoodforesttwo 2 years ago
yes but everyone who does do great inhumanity belives they are doing good
djboony 2 years ago
For djboony: Not everyone of the crooks thinks they are doing good, some of them are aware that they are stealing from the planet, but they don't care, they have no conscience. But I guess most of them kid themselves into believing that they are doing good things. I have seen it how some people twist the facts in their minds to feel better about what they are doing. This is what a corrupt mind is. That's why strong positive and some strict incentives are necessary in a political system.
redwoodforesttwo 2 years ago
Why can't people move out of the big cities? Why did they stay? People can stand up peacefully and say no to oppression of any sort. They can walk out. They can move to less populated areas and homestead land and build simple homes. Today there is only one solution to the world's crisis, and that is becoming localized and simple in our life styles. The largest problem in our society is that people want what they see on TV, they want what is portrayed as important. But it is really not important.
redwoodforesttwo 2 years ago
correct, it's what chomsky refers to as "fashionable consumption"
spits32 2 years ago
Chomsky is looking terrible.
But he is brilliant!
djdtpackers 2 years ago 2
Considering he's 80 years old and his wife of 60 years just died, he's looking fantastic. If I'd put that kind of work in for as long as he has, I'd be dead.
jammoexii 2 years ago 8
I second that.
lucretius4 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no, he looks like he's about to die, and that makes me think im about to laugh.
oiuoiu988 2 years ago
@jammoexii I wish all leftists would die.
leeason1 1 year ago
He is old.
He looks cute:).
Nederlandac 2 years ago 3
when 900 years old you reach, look this good you will not.
tristramshandy3 2 years ago
In comradeship from Australia
franks2732 2 years ago
great interview
onlywhenprovoked 2 years ago 2
How lame can you be? Grammer checking YouTube entries and coming to a conclusion on education level by that. I wonder what kind of education you have.
Kingarthur305 2 years ago
Comment removed
elendardk 2 years ago
Thanks Buddhagem and Chomskyan
Xsublime28xX 2 years ago
@3:00 -3:50 - I assume that Chomsky, when speaking about changing institutions, is talking about violent change after reform does not align the governent with popular attitudes. Also, he argues strongly in favor of legitimate authority. At what point do people have the legitimate authority to use violence against the state?
Health care - 45-50 million Amercans go without.. Would this make it legitimate to use force if reforms are not passed? What type of force?
7jerryv7 2 years ago
Thanks Buddhagem. Must have been great to interview him.
The talk about pushing reform to the limits is really interesting.
CapitalistHolocaust 2 years ago 4
Buddhagem - great interview. Thanx
7jerryv7 2 years ago 6
Noam does look tired. It must be, besides age, the burden of caring so much information.
mogem 2 years ago 13
@mogem Noam is a millionaire. His fee to lecture at universities is $12,000. He couldn't care less about the poor.
leeason1 1 year ago
@leeason1 No he's a hypocrite in many ways who still manages to care about the poor by working tirelessly to spread information that you could not hope to receive through any mainstream news giant.
aGothicStory 1 year ago
@aGothicStory Oh, so it's alright to be a millionaire as long as you "spread information". Got it.
leeason1 1 year ago
Chomsky is right about Wilson. That president was so oppressive.
ZamatoElite 2 years ago
Boy, Chomsky is looking more and more like Billy Crystal in The Princess Bride - just less crazy and more intelligent.
metalorg 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Reagan is the man. He stuck a knive in the labor moment. God Bless his soul. I hope Chomsky can do something instead of living his whole life in a University. No wonder he's so wishy washy and unreal. All the things he stands on are unrealistic fantasies.
I guess the young liberal college kids love him. O well they'll grow up.
Kingarthur305 2 years ago
I guess you love sucking some government dick. Oh well, to each their own.
SmokiSounds 2 years ago
lol, I have to admit, I like you. That's funny.
Kingarthur305 2 years ago
Oh I know, I'm that kinda guy.
SmokiSounds 2 years ago
kingarthur305
don't worry about things like education, that doesn't concern people like you. Just leave these discussions to people with average intelligence and above.
oh and by the way :
singular = knife
plural = knives
onlywhenprovoked 2 years ago
Another petty English teacher you are.
Kingarthur305 2 years ago
What's your education level?
Kingarthur305 2 years ago
Trolling,eh?
7jerryv7 2 years ago
"cool" @ 3:50 lol
dbrockttu 2 years ago 2
I have rarely heard Chomsky discuss changing institutions and regimes, especially the US, and the argument of using coercion as self-defense is really astounding
7jerryv7 2 years ago 3
Yes, quite rare to hear Chomsky talk of force.
CapitalistHolocaust 2 years ago
@CapitalistHolocaust Yeah because it's not like Stalin invaded all of the Baltic states in the USSR or anything. Yeah, communism never used force, LOL.
leeason1 1 year ago
@leeason1
How is this relevant?
CapitalistHolocaust 1 year ago
I don't think this is a very radical position -certainly no more so than the "whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends (i.e. life, liberty, persuit of happiness), it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it" in the U.S. constitution. Note that he only advocates coercion where (when?) existing institutions do not admit reform.
ADumbUsername 2 years ago
True, but Chomsky, from my understanding, tends towards peaceful solutions. He is not a pacifist but does not talk often (I have actually never heard him before) discuss when coercion is acceptable. Given his argument that authority must justify itself, and most people would argue that the authority to use coercion should have the highest threashold, he actually provides a fairly easy litmus test for the use of coercion. You are right - he is consistent with Thomas Jefferson and DofI.
7jerryv7 2 years ago
Enlightening interview!
bigchuck333 2 years ago
A truly beautiful human being.
Costign 2 years ago 12