There is no doubt that Germany would have conquered Britain and Russia and overrun half the world, IF, and only if she had been led by a competent leader. If Rommel or the Panzer divisions in the West during the early hours of the Normandy invasion had been allowed to move on their own initiative without the personal permission of Hitler himself, for example, Operation Overlord would have been driven back into the sea and mainland Europe would still be in German hands.
If... if... if... if... your second name??? if my grandma had a cock she could be grandpa... if Stalin didnt kill all head of soviet army in 1937 your Germany could suck in 1941 not in 1945 without "overlord" and other shitty help from "alies"..
walter model was a crazy soldier.....he got things done and was a fanatical Nazi. When his forces capitulated in the Ruhr he went off towards allied lines with is pistol ... when nothing happened he shot himself
Odessa liberated? They have to be joking, the Soviets had already starved 13 million Ukrainians the decade earlier, the Germans were the real liberators.
The National Socialists murdered people and the Holocaust is a historical reality. My point is that the German armies largely were not murders, and by defeating the Soviet establishment granted them Independence. It is largely recognized Eastern Europe would have bee granted Independence from German interests of Greater Germania.
And yes, as you observed, I am a White Nationalist.
Remember Lebensraum? Remember the plans of 'Germanizing' the East and cleansing it of 'untermensch'? This was the Holocaust. Not everyone in the Wehrmacht was a murderer but its masters most definitely were.
You're using a historical perspective from a post W2 perspective. Expanding German living space was an aim of German conflict but the existence of untermensch view is largely false when analysed from a primary source viewpoint. Russians and other Eastern Europeans fought in the German army, some in the SS. Your position is therefore exploiting the sentiment that the Germans would somehow envisaged to kill all the Russians, a view not only logistically impossible but inherently false at that.
Whether this is true or not doesn't change the fact that the Nazis implemented the Holocaust where millions died. For you to call them liberators is bullshit.
Yes, the Holocaust is a historical reality, but the suggestion that millions died is disputable; especially when most (almost all) of these death camps were in Soviet 'liberated' areas of influence. The fact that to even question this 'truth' results in the thought criminal being sent to jail, does suggest that the post WW2 establishment is hindering research. In fact even the mainstream historical account has decreased by several million in estimate; that even the lie is unsure of itself.
@June28July Where are you from? Have you ever traveled Europe? My Pa Pa fought in the Ruhr and met my grandma in Berlin 1946 in hospital. We travled to Europe in 2001 and lets just many are realizing Europe would be a better place if france and Britian didnt declare war on Germany. People tend to forget that Soviet union attacked Finland in 39 along with the baltic states and Poland. i talked to a man in Romania for 2 hours and said the communist raped his country for 40years
I'm American. I've never been to Europe but if I did visit it, what was I supposed to learn from traveling there? If I had been in Europe in 2001 like you were, what would I have seen?
If you can to Europe you would see what Cultural Marxism is doing to Indigenous Europeans. It is promoting diversity, where we are expected to celebrate our own demographic decline.
Communism is a disease which dercinates society. The Germans knew this, they remain the only nation to engage in a war against Communism. White people would be better off if the Axis defeated Communism.
I am not suggesting they were saints, surely not, merely that they are the lesser evil, an evil nonetheless.
Cultural Marxism is a term to describe the political theory of applied Critical Theory in a sociological sense and the observed results of said theory. It's a rough description, you should read Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals for more info.
Diversity, encouraging 3rd world migrants into our nations, celebrate their culture over our own, refuse assimilation. European birthrate 1.0 Immigrant groups like Islamic in France estimate 6.3.
You clearly do not concur with my views, I see this dialogue as an exercise in futility, I have more important things to do than handhold you through Weltpolitik.
If you genuinely wish to know more and be informed about this, I would be willing to continue such but questions like "This is a problem how?" render one to think you are basically wasting both our times.
Even so, I would suggest you do research. You will learn many folds more by individual investigation then being told so.
Really? I thought it was a valid question. After all, the only way said demographic changes would be a problem was if one group was good and the other bad. I don't think this is so but do you? Are foreigners good or bad?
Anyways, I am doing research: I'm asking people who seem to be familiar with the issue questions.
Primary sources include texts published by German military and political leaders who establish National Socialist Germany's policy, Table Talk, also the autobiographies of von Manstein etc. They clearly illustrate the plan for the East, contrary to today's imposition.
I would also suggest looking into the contemporaries published in American correspondence, and of the liberated areas in the East, particular the Ukraine. Even today, much of the east teaches revised history.
@ForImperium many people these days believe America fought on the wrong side and the world wouldbe a better place for us whites if Germany won.. America's best general stated we also fought on the wrong side.
It certainly would be, looking at Western Europe and North America we observe massive, vast shifts in demographics, where whites are not only discriminated through affirmative action openly, but the reality that whites are becoming minorities in the lands of their indigenous heritage is actually celebrated as 'diversity'. This is a calculated attempt to not only deconstruct white culture but to eliminate white people as a cohesive identity and as a people. The Axis were right; if only...
@ForImperium Europeans from man , many diffrent countries fough along side the germans in the Waffen ss..Latvia , Ukraine, Belgium , Frrance, Netherlands, finish, norway, ss wiking and ss nordland amond many other divisions
@June28July Genral George Patton , the one who took the most land in europe and took the most prisnoners.. He stated we fought on the wrong side and should have fought along side the germans
Do I see an WW I austrian helmet at 8:48?
fabiolone70 2 weeks ago
There is no doubt that Germany would have conquered Britain and Russia and overrun half the world, IF, and only if she had been led by a competent leader. If Rommel or the Panzer divisions in the West during the early hours of the Normandy invasion had been allowed to move on their own initiative without the personal permission of Hitler himself, for example, Operation Overlord would have been driven back into the sea and mainland Europe would still be in German hands.
B1gO 1 month ago
@B1gO
If... if... if... if... your second name??? if my grandma had a cock she could be grandpa... if Stalin didnt kill all head of soviet army in 1937 your Germany could suck in 1941 not in 1945 without "overlord" and other shitty help from "alies"..
1980friend 1 month ago
Comment removed
popper504 3 months ago
walter model was a crazy soldier.....he got things done and was a fanatical Nazi. When his forces capitulated in the Ruhr he went off towards allied lines with is pistol ... when nothing happened he shot himself
popper504 4 months ago
yes thx for posting these ...truly amazing docu
popper504 4 months ago
Odessa liberated? They have to be joking, the Soviets had already starved 13 million Ukrainians the decade earlier, the Germans were the real liberators.
1488
ForImperium 4 months ago
@ForImperium true
popper504 4 months ago
@popper504
What's true?
June28July 3 months ago in playlist More videos from Wolfen126
@ForImperium
1488? White Nationalist much? No, the Nazis were murderers and you are a moron. Holocaust denier also I presume?
June28July 3 months ago in playlist More videos from Wolfen126
The National Socialists murdered people and the Holocaust is a historical reality. My point is that the German armies largely were not murders, and by defeating the Soviet establishment granted them Independence. It is largely recognized Eastern Europe would have bee granted Independence from German interests of Greater Germania.
And yes, as you observed, I am a White Nationalist.
ForImperium 3 months ago
@ForImperium
Remember Lebensraum? Remember the plans of 'Germanizing' the East and cleansing it of 'untermensch'? This was the Holocaust. Not everyone in the Wehrmacht was a murderer but its masters most definitely were.
June28July 3 months ago
You're using a historical perspective from a post W2 perspective. Expanding German living space was an aim of German conflict but the existence of untermensch view is largely false when analysed from a primary source viewpoint. Russians and other Eastern Europeans fought in the German army, some in the SS. Your position is therefore exploiting the sentiment that the Germans would somehow envisaged to kill all the Russians, a view not only logistically impossible but inherently false at that.
ForImperium 3 months ago
@ForImperium
Whether this is true or not doesn't change the fact that the Nazis implemented the Holocaust where millions died. For you to call them liberators is bullshit.
BTW, what primary sources are you referring to?
June28July 3 months ago
Yes, the Holocaust is a historical reality, but the suggestion that millions died is disputable; especially when most (almost all) of these death camps were in Soviet 'liberated' areas of influence. The fact that to even question this 'truth' results in the thought criminal being sent to jail, does suggest that the post WW2 establishment is hindering research. In fact even the mainstream historical account has decreased by several million in estimate; that even the lie is unsure of itself.
ForImperium 3 months ago
@ForImperium
I don't understand: what are we supposed to conclude from the fact that death camps were in Soviet reconquered territory?
Also, what primary sources are you referring to?
June28July 3 months ago
@June28July Where are you from? Have you ever traveled Europe? My Pa Pa fought in the Ruhr and met my grandma in Berlin 1946 in hospital. We travled to Europe in 2001 and lets just many are realizing Europe would be a better place if france and Britian didnt declare war on Germany. People tend to forget that Soviet union attacked Finland in 39 along with the baltic states and Poland. i talked to a man in Romania for 2 hours and said the communist raped his country for 40years
popper504 3 months ago
@popper504
I'm American. I've never been to Europe but if I did visit it, what was I supposed to learn from traveling there? If I had been in Europe in 2001 like you were, what would I have seen?
June28July 2 months ago
If you can to Europe you would see what Cultural Marxism is doing to Indigenous Europeans. It is promoting diversity, where we are expected to celebrate our own demographic decline.
Communism is a disease which dercinates society. The Germans knew this, they remain the only nation to engage in a war against Communism. White people would be better off if the Axis defeated Communism.
I am not suggesting they were saints, surely not, merely that they are the lesser evil, an evil nonetheless.
ForImperium 2 months ago
@ForImperium
I have one request and one question:
Define Cultural Marxism.
How is diversity leading to a demographic decline?
Please explain.
June28July 2 months ago
Do research yourself, you would avoid my bias.
Cultural Marxism is a term to describe the political theory of applied Critical Theory in a sociological sense and the observed results of said theory. It's a rough description, you should read Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals for more info.
Diversity, encouraging 3rd world migrants into our nations, celebrate their culture over our own, refuse assimilation. European birthrate 1.0 Immigrant groups like Islamic in France estimate 6.3.
ForImperium 2 months ago
@ForImperium
'celebrate their culture over our own'
How does this happen?
'refuse assimilation'
Define assimilation
'European birthrate 1.0 Immigrant groups like Islamic in France estimate 6.3'
This is a problem how?
June28July 2 months ago
You clearly do not concur with my views, I see this dialogue as an exercise in futility, I have more important things to do than handhold you through Weltpolitik.
If you genuinely wish to know more and be informed about this, I would be willing to continue such but questions like "This is a problem how?" render one to think you are basically wasting both our times.
Even so, I would suggest you do research. You will learn many folds more by individual investigation then being told so.
ForImperium 2 months ago
@ForImperium
Really? I thought it was a valid question. After all, the only way said demographic changes would be a problem was if one group was good and the other bad. I don't think this is so but do you? Are foreigners good or bad?
Anyways, I am doing research: I'm asking people who seem to be familiar with the issue questions.
June28July 2 months ago
Primary sources include texts published by German military and political leaders who establish National Socialist Germany's policy, Table Talk, also the autobiographies of von Manstein etc. They clearly illustrate the plan for the East, contrary to today's imposition.
I would also suggest looking into the contemporaries published in American correspondence, and of the liberated areas in the East, particular the Ukraine. Even today, much of the east teaches revised history.
FYI General Patton
ForImperium 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ForImperium
You didn't answer my first question: what are we supposed to conclude from the fact that death camps were in Soviet reconquered territory?
So what do you make of the estimates still being in the millions regardless of the adjustments you have claimed were made at some point?
June28July 3 months ago
@ForImperium many people these days believe America fought on the wrong side and the world wouldbe a better place for us whites if Germany won.. America's best general stated we also fought on the wrong side.
popper504 3 months ago
It certainly would be, looking at Western Europe and North America we observe massive, vast shifts in demographics, where whites are not only discriminated through affirmative action openly, but the reality that whites are becoming minorities in the lands of their indigenous heritage is actually celebrated as 'diversity'. This is a calculated attempt to not only deconstruct white culture but to eliminate white people as a cohesive identity and as a people. The Axis were right; if only...
ForImperium 3 months ago
@ForImperium Europeans from man , many diffrent countries fough along side the germans in the Waffen ss..Latvia , Ukraine, Belgium , Frrance, Netherlands, finish, norway, ss wiking and ss nordland amond many other divisions
popper504 3 months ago
@popper504
So we should have fought alongside the murderous Nazis? And what general are you referring to?
June28July 3 months ago
@June28July Genral George Patton , the one who took the most land in europe and took the most prisnoners.. He stated we fought on the wrong side and should have fought along side the germans
popper504 3 months ago
@popper504
I'm curious: how exactly would the world have been better for whites if the Nazis had won?
June28July 3 months ago
Comment removed
popper504 3 months ago
Comment removed
popper504 3 months ago
Comment removed
popper504 3 months ago
thanks for posting these my friend!
jizzinmypants191919 9 months ago
@jizzinmypants191919 No problem, thanks for watching them.
Wolfen126 9 months ago