In this documentary starting from background music and ending with Karabakh history it is apparent that this is a sponsored (ordered) material, most probably by armenians. Only Armenian version of Karabakh, its history, the war is shown here, by totally ignoring Azeri side. This is nothing but double standards.
As long as our history, our culture and our churches stand there. It will be ours. History shows whos been there and who hasnt. Sadly Azeris don't see that and still haven't learned from the mistakes. They deprived karabagh from its rights and only destroyed it. Bombed it and made it's people suffer. why? cause they knew very well it is an Armenian region.
In what aspect is it bias? this is Euronews. The entire history of karabagh is based in Armenia. Karabagh's historical and real name is Artsakh. Just because Karabagh was illegaly taken from Armenia and put under Azeri control in 1922 by Stalin, doesn't make it Azeri. Azeris started populating the area in soviet times yet the population remained Armenian and karabagh was still independant. The Azeri government only hurt karabagh's condition and could only destroy it.
well.....if the report is conducted by Euronews, it does not imply that it's unbiased. reporters or even an entire tv channel could be biased. probably, the reporter visited that area and asked around. and his all interviewees were Armenian, because right now there's no single Azerbaijani Turk, as they are forced to leave their homes. I can state millions of arguments against what is told here...
Well first of all you can say that to hundreds of thousand Armenians who were forced out of their homes in Baku and many of whom were killed despite that they were citizens born there. Second of all there were another massacres in Sumgayit aside from Baku. Another thing about Artsakh is that it has always been majority Armenian. Even when it was put under azeri control Armenians made up 80 percent because they stayed there as it was there patriotic duty but not in all cases.
another thing to whatever you have stated still doesn't change the fact that Artsakh(karabagh) is a historical and modern Armenian land. It was never part of Azerbaijan within its independant days only within Soviet times. Which again goes back to 1922 when Stalin illegaly took the region of karabagh and Nakhichevan from Armenia and put it under azeri control to please the turks. That does not mean that the land is now azeri does it? the people and history of the region remains Armenian.
:)) you say all this cuz you were taught like this...:) i don't want to open a new topic under this video..it's not the right place. but i know quite a lot info about Karabakh (maybe cuz i was taught at school like this).. i offer you not to claim any countries' legal territory. it's my last comment... i won't write anymore. good luck;)
kheo im first of all karabagh Armenian and I know the history of the region far better than you do. Fact is that Artsakh(karabagh) is first of all historical Armenian land. Armenians have lived there since pre-roman times. We lay a historical claim there as opposed to azeris who didn't appear there only within the last century as settlers. Nomadic turkic tribes. I base my knowledge on historical fact rather than some anti-Armenian made up propoganda. Which is always the case in Azerbaijan.
artsakh is armenia!!
8hennry8barca 1 year ago 3
Nagorno Karabakh(Arsakh)is as Armenian as the duduk music in this clip
GaroArmen 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In this documentary starting from background music and ending with Karabakh history it is apparent that this is a sponsored (ordered) material, most probably by armenians. Only Armenian version of Karabakh, its history, the war is shown here, by totally ignoring Azeri side. This is nothing but double standards.
lieofcentury 2 years ago
As long as our history, our culture and our churches stand there. It will be ours. History shows whos been there and who hasnt. Sadly Azeris don't see that and still haven't learned from the mistakes. They deprived karabagh from its rights and only destroyed it. Bombed it and made it's people suffer. why? cause they knew very well it is an Armenian region.
shagenchik 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
the report based on only the narratings of armenians... it's biased.....
kheo17 2 years ago
In what aspect is it bias? this is Euronews. The entire history of karabagh is based in Armenia. Karabagh's historical and real name is Artsakh. Just because Karabagh was illegaly taken from Armenia and put under Azeri control in 1922 by Stalin, doesn't make it Azeri. Azeris started populating the area in soviet times yet the population remained Armenian and karabagh was still independant. The Azeri government only hurt karabagh's condition and could only destroy it.
shagenchik 2 years ago 4
well.....if the report is conducted by Euronews, it does not imply that it's unbiased. reporters or even an entire tv channel could be biased. probably, the reporter visited that area and asked around. and his all interviewees were Armenian, because right now there's no single Azerbaijani Turk, as they are forced to leave their homes. I can state millions of arguments against what is told here...
kheo17 2 years ago
Well first of all you can say that to hundreds of thousand Armenians who were forced out of their homes in Baku and many of whom were killed despite that they were citizens born there. Second of all there were another massacres in Sumgayit aside from Baku. Another thing about Artsakh is that it has always been majority Armenian. Even when it was put under azeri control Armenians made up 80 percent because they stayed there as it was there patriotic duty but not in all cases.
shagenchik 2 years ago 2
another thing to whatever you have stated still doesn't change the fact that Artsakh(karabagh) is a historical and modern Armenian land. It was never part of Azerbaijan within its independant days only within Soviet times. Which again goes back to 1922 when Stalin illegaly took the region of karabagh and Nakhichevan from Armenia and put it under azeri control to please the turks. That does not mean that the land is now azeri does it? the people and history of the region remains Armenian.
shagenchik 2 years ago 2
:)) you say all this cuz you were taught like this...:) i don't want to open a new topic under this video..it's not the right place. but i know quite a lot info about Karabakh (maybe cuz i was taught at school like this).. i offer you not to claim any countries' legal territory. it's my last comment... i won't write anymore. good luck;)
kheo17 2 years ago
kheo im first of all karabagh Armenian and I know the history of the region far better than you do. Fact is that Artsakh(karabagh) is first of all historical Armenian land. Armenians have lived there since pre-roman times. We lay a historical claim there as opposed to azeris who didn't appear there only within the last century as settlers. Nomadic turkic tribes. I base my knowledge on historical fact rather than some anti-Armenian made up propoganda. Which is always the case in Azerbaijan.
shagenchik 2 years ago 2
Karabakh is Armenia!
Карабак је Јерменија!
Greetings from Serbia!
srbinprizrenac91 2 years ago 21
Karabakh is Armenia
Kirovakanzi 2 years ago 13
Ketse Euronews....great reporting
HaroutunianJack 2 years ago 5
wonderful video>>>bravo EURONEWS
ellepelleelle 2 years ago 7
gooooooooood
ArmeniaYouthFederat 2 years ago 5