Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (128)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • FUCK JON KING

  • its funny that the establishment whore dinosaur israel zionist msm doesnt know yet that no one listens to their propagand anymore.. LOL.. look at these stupid schmucks.. the same old tired propagandist they always wheel out every election year to spew their crap. Guess what idiots.. if Ron Pauls a "freak" then we are all freaks, because Ron Paul stands for everything america is SUPPOSE to be about.

    RON PAUL 2012 or REVOLUTION

  • Jesse Benton is exceptional during interviews - sharp guy

    Ron Paul 2012 !!!!!

  • Ron Paul!

  • wolf blitzer gets so mad when anything good is said about ron paul, he was asked a question about ron paul and responds with gingrinch and santorum and doesn't mention ron paul once

  • erin burnett the pig needs to go back to her trough out by the farmhouse.

  • @eBe4IXcept I'm talking about the current statistical situation. Anyone 'stands a chance' at rising upward, but it is mostly right now between Romney and Paul (which is partially why they are nearly acting buddy-buddy), with Romney with the clear advantage in votes and delegate counts. There are too many that are loyal to Paul (no, it's not 'fringe', but its also not 'majority') for Romney to make a target out of him (yet?).

  • Did I just hear that right? GINGRICH is the one challenging the establishment and attacking Romney?

    Wow, Gingrich is in the pocket of the establishment, I can't believe they'd say something even that stupid.

  • 4:50

    Wolf Blitzer is totally sucking some Romney cock.

  • @eBe4IXcept cont.

    The rest, Perry, Gingrich, Huntsman all trail this pack, but there are many more states to go. Only thing we can really confirm at this point is that Perry is just there to be there, and Gingrich is too proud to leave. Huntsman and Santorum are sticking in and may or may not gain a lead depending on the later states' demographics. Otherwise, yes, it's a Romney vs Paul race.

  • @eBe4IXcept Yes. Google 'cnn iowa results'. They and Santorum each TIED for 7 delegates. However, Romney is still the 'winner' not because of the votes (though media would like you to think so), but because he also got several more unpledged delegates by default. But still, in terms of 'who was victorious', it was a 3-way tie with Romney, Santorum, and Paul.

    So now we stand at Romney with a strong-ish 1st place nationally, Paul with a solid 2nd place, Santorum with a weak 3rd place.

  • Anytime I hear Gergen speak I vomit a little. That guy you can safely call a freak and be honest about. He's a baby eating war loving blood drinking Vampire, no wait Vampires are too cool for this analogy...he's a parasitic leech and a lying douche nozzle that should just keep his Mr. Potato-Head lips locked safely in his back of his hollow head.

  • PROOF the media uses subliminal messages and LIES to you to make you Think Ron Paul is Losing and UnElectable.

    At 6:32 it starts showing "Delegates to Date" Romney 23 Paul 10 Santo 8 This is the CNN channel. On the CNN website ,it shows Romney with 12 Delegates Paul 10 TOTALS and those are After the elections is fully in. This vid was before they had the full count and they extend Romneys lead even Further. Paul has NEVER been in 3rd in Delegates , by CNN's own Numbers on their website

  • @eBe4IXcept And of course, there's another... 1092 left to choose. The 'race' itself could end this month, or next month, or continue contested until late spring. Depends on if the heat keeps up, or if the party decides to say, gangpile support on Romney. (at which point the later caucuses become mostly a formality - but if not, then they become this masssssive 'tiebreaker')

  • @eBe4IXcept In *confirmed* delegates, Paul got just 1-2 less than Romney and Santorum in Iowa. 3rd place doesn't matter as it was so close, so they shared amongst themselves in delegates. Uncomfirmed delegates (currently another 10 for Romney in Iowa) can change their decision at any time.

    You're right about New Hampshire! Romney cleaned up. But overall, in PLEDGED delegates, Romney = 14, Paul = 10, Santorum = 7, the rest = 2, Bachmann = 0. It's ONLY the 10 unpledged for Romney that boosts him.

  • Why are they still talking about Newt?!

    Paul is the one who has been leading the charge against Romney first and foremost because his record is unblemished.

    Ron Paul 2012

  • @eBe4IXcept No. In actual caucus information, in pledged delegates, Paul is only 2 behind Romney (so a near tie). The issue is the 10 unpledged behind Romney that automatically go to him before all these caucus events. They may all stay with him, or if events and opinions change, go to another candidate. *When it comes to what has been happening in Iowa and NH*, Paul is JUST behind Romney. When it comes to the national race, that's another story and it has Romney significantly behind everyone :)

  • Ron Paul also has the votes of educated Americans as well. I am over 50, and am glad to see the youth are awake and aware, voting for the only man in the race with a real solution to the problems we face today. Ron isn't just for the young, he is for each and every American in this country. Freedom is not a 'new' idea, so I would have to disagree its new; but rather, a return to freedom since we have had so much freedom taken away from us. GO RON PAUL!!!

  • nice vid

  • GO GINGRICH! GO SANTORUM! HELP PAUL LAUNCH THE ATTACK ON ROMNEY!

  • What I see is consistent arguments containing logical fallacies. These are the same types of arguments used in propaganda.. I would love to say we Paul supporters have a chance but looking at how the opposition has control of the media and is willing to use their power to manipulate the masses I really can't see a way to pull it out. The control of the media and by that I mean MSNBC, CNN, ABC, and to an extent Fox has left us with Mitt a real sorry choice for a conservative.

  • @MatthewBMany Se we get 3rd place, 2nd place, and now that people see we are a real contender youre losing hope? Part of why people dont vote for Paul is because of the MSM saying he cant win, we have and will continue to prove them wrong in the next few elections and more people will join when they see Romney falling and Paul gaining.

  • @tehdouglas1 I am going to keep supporting Paul. The problem I see is that he quite literally has the entire power structure against him. I will vote for Paul and if he is not running I will vote for Gary Johnson... The difference is that I have watched every news show about the candidates for the last 30 days or so.. and I am telling you that the news media is having an effect. I don't see the internet touching enough people to win, I hope I am wrong but people seem to be dumb

  • Comment removed

  • I love the way they are talking about a 2 man race. Sticking it to the media who are still banging on about Gingrich even though his votes have dropped off a cliff.

    Ron Paul and his followers have the right to talk about a 2 man race and there's nothing the mainstream media can do about it

    Ron Paul 2012

  • we need to pop the media bubble.

  • PROOF the media uses subliminal messages and LIES to you to make you Think Ron Paul is Losing and UnElectable.

    At 2:31 it starts showing "Delegates to Date" Romney 23 Paul 10. This is the CNN channel. On the CNN website ,it shows Romney with 12 Delegates Paul 10 TOTALS and those are After the elections is fully in. This vid was before they had the full count and they extend Romneys lead even Further. Paul has NEVER been in 3rd in Delegates as shown earlier, by CNN's own Numbers on their website

  • What a bunch of insubstantial twits on CNN. All they can talk about is personal emotional idiot arguments and wondering what will manipulate who the best. Not one issue of substance was discussed. No wonder they can't understand Ron Paul they are complete idiots.

  • Media whores, these guys have no clue, I wish they would just get back to being reporters of the news, not all this BS opinions! Ron Paul 2012

  • i think it would a really great thing if we could get dr pauls description on contract laws and privacy laws, and how the freemarkets would work so that those voters who just don't seem to get it would have a better idea about why it would be better to have ron paul as president rather than those neocon's

  • DAVID GERGEN Bochemian Grove

  • @eBe4IXcept how is Ron Paul a Kook?

  • You guys are completely delusional...X0

  • Hopefully the first two primaries are where all the cheating and fraud goes on and Ron can get this coon treed by the time he gets to Florida, Im pretty sure he'll win in Louisiana and Mississsippi..

  • The media tries to shape reality. Those days are about to end. Ron paul 2012

  • romney..are you shitting bricks yet..you should be ...Ron Paul 2012 2016

  • Tim Shitlenty is one fugly son of a bitch

  • People are blowing it in this country!

  • It's amazing how stupid these so called 'pundits' are. The comments they make are so superficial and worthless. They reflect how stupid Romney fans are - ignorant of the substantive issues, and focus only on superficial issues. Yet, Paul fans, can rattle off an assortment of specific substantive reasons for why they support him. Ask a Romney fan; "What specific aspect of Romney's platform makes you vote for him?" Answer:"Umm Duh?"

  • Look at CIA Wolf lol.

  • Benton is VP of a Washington 501(c)(4) lobby group headed by an anti-union "right-to-work" fanatic. Just thought the Paulbots might like to know that.

  • @RedTory59 Forgiven!

  • @eBe4IXcept Yet only a couple more delegates. Votes do not reflect success here, except in the national convention. All votes tell is the 'tone' for the state, to possibly carry onto other states as the process continues.

  • these muther fuckers have tele prompters EVERY WHERE. this is a new level of propaganda. THE WHOLE THING IS SCRIPTED.

  • YIPPPEEEEEE!!!

  • Why is this brit on us tv

  • LOL. Never thought I would see the day CNN going out of its way to endorse Mitt Romney. If that doesn't scare you, I don't know what will.

  • Ron Pool

  • Liberty > Media Shills

  • take a shot everytime Paul says 'FREEDOM' you'll be SMASHED!.

  • @MultiInternetfreak you hate freedom it's on the record

  • @atripa645 it depends on your view of freedom, does freedom equate to increased social progression such as universal healthcare, the gay community being able to marry the person of their choosing, better educational standards, helping to provide ample opportunities to low income households & the future advancement of new sciences to aid mankind. Paul's ideals would not do this so i cannot support him as he only wants to offer betterment to those already supported & may in-fact make things worse.

  • @MultiInternetfreak is that right? I don't think so.

  • @atripa645 tell me how it's wrong then?.

  • @MultiInternetfreak Ron Paul would allow gays to marry. How? He'd eliminate the need for Federal and State marriage licenses. Two gays want to get married? Just find a priest willing to marry you and you're set. None of the government's business. Church doesn't like it? Too bad. The government can't do anything about it, but Lord help the Church if they try to infringe upon those gay's Constitutional right to freedom of religion.

  • @MultiInternetfreak Universal health care is not progression when it becomes a burden upon the taxpayers to support. What good is healthcare when the government is too broke to fund it?

  • @GrowTheTruth - the taxpayers are already paying higher premiums due to the numbers of uninsured Americans, In 2006, 46.6 million Americans were without health insurance. Most had incomes above the poverty level, & thus, did not qualify for government programs. if most other 1st world countries pay less than the US and also get higher efficiency, are they all wrong?.

    so we cannot afford universal healthcare but we can fund multiple wars, bailouts, bonuses & tax credits to corporations?.

  • @MultiInternetfreak no we can't afford any of it.

  • Oh MY FUCKING GOD!!!!!!!!!!!! Shilling at the end, big time --- So obvious, who do these media shills think they're fooling? Internet rules.... SOPA IS NO GO... fascists

  • Its David"Bohemian" Gergen...lol

  • Wow I really got to see how big of shills you are. thanks CNN

  • yeaah done deal... what is the point of voting... lets make him king:)

  • 5 Bozos, 1 former AIPAC official, 1 Bohemian Grove regular, 2 dual israeli americans, 1 black-gloved vamp who likes to handle big cuban cigars, 1 jilted lover who's convinced the Newt will shed his skin and come back and 1 reference to RP...as a freak.

    nice...

  • You've got to be an idiot not to see the truth staring you in the face.

  • DAVID GERGGENN!! DAMNIT YOU BASTARD

  • FUCK YOU GEORGE GERGEN!!

  • Ron Paul is HONEST.

  • Ron's Fall 2012

  • Romney is the "citizens united" corporate whore and the billionaires are trying to buy the election for him.

  • Ron Paul 🍜🍺✈☀

  • RP12!

  • OH MY GOD PAUL GERGEN IS SITTING THERE?!?!?!? WHAT THE FUCK=?!

  • RON PAUL2012!

  • Mormon vs Christian

  • John king ...married to Dana Bash, gloria married to a Wall street insider along with  Erin....they dont even make out they are fair and balanced.....fucking wallstreet cronies

  • Ignore the pundits - LOOK AT THE NUMBERS! If John Huntsman's numbers ALONE go to Ron Paul he will be AHEAD of Mitt Romney...

  • 91k vs 53k.

    wat a BIG difference.

  • EEK! David Gergen PUBLICLY ADMITTED he attends the Bohemian Grove ritual and therefore he is a Freemason of the highest order and a member of Secret Societies which govern this world...

  • @jammustardj OH NOES! A RICH GUY GOES TO A RICH GUYS SUMMER CAMP!!! SPOOKYPANTS!!!!!

  • @imarocksinger Even if you don't believe in the conspiracy, why do you enjoy hearing this "rich guy who goes to rich guy parties" opinion about the future of our country over and over again on MSM? Do you think he cares about you and your family? Damn sheeple...

  • @jammustardj "Derp I heard Bill Cooper say sheeple once and it made me laugh so now I'm gonna call anyone who questions my retarded beliefs a sheeple derpa derp."

  • @imarocksinger Yea, and when Obama and Romney talk about sheeple in private... they are laughing at all of the 99 percent that just don't want to believe the 1 percent despise them. I guess they are holding out for a few more handouts before they implement their Eugenic Healthcare Programme.

  • @luckisalady1 go back to merry old england with your "programme" it's PROGRAM you fuckin limey. you dont know shit about america.

  • the tide is turning. we have to put more energy in order to combat the resistance and lack of fair reporting.

  • ŘȎƝ ṖẴŮḺ

  • hmm. Toche Romney.

  • Liberty !....Too big to fail !!!!!

  • @meantheam dont you mean Liberty and Liberty ! Too big to fail!

  • RP▬🇺🇸▬▬▬*▬▬▬▬▬🇺🇸▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬*▬▬▬RP­­▬🇺🇸▬

    Dr. Ron Paul R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution 2012 Я☼N PΔUL ЯΞ√ΩLUT↑ON

    ▬▬🇺🇸▬▬▬RP🇺🇸_▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩🇺🇸ஜ▬▬▬_­­RP▬▬▬▬

    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

    END THE WARS | RESTORE LIBERTY | RP 2012!▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬` 🇺

  • “It’s amazing that people don’t understand that the more the market is involved and the smaller the government, the lower the price, the better the distribution, and the higher the quality.”

    ― Ron Paul, Liberty Defined: The 50 Urgent Issues That Affect Our Freedom

  • @compacflt Lol have you seen Ireland lately? How'd austrian economics work out for them?

    You know when America had the biggest government involvement in the market? World War 2 and there was huge growth under a genuine centrally planned market. Ron Paul would tell you that is impossible but it is a matter of public record. You can look it up.

  • @SuperBenzid So let me get this straight... Ireland is in trouble because of the most vehement critics of what caused the Irish property bubble? So when it bursts, that makes the proponents of the bubble the good guys?

    Your logic is flawed.

  • @SuperBenzid

    Are you kidding me? We weren't prosperous in WWII. We used our wealth on bullets and bombs while things we wanted like meat and butter were rationed. It wasn't until after the war when spending and the size of gov't was cut did prosperity return. Also check out the USSR for their wonderful record under central economic planning. Or modern day North Korea. Geez.

  • @razerfish Say all the bad things you want about North Korea, they produce the most entertaining propaganda videos known to man.

  • @razerfish Check out America for a great example of capitalism's "success". How is that bought up corporate government working out for you?

  • @SuperBenzid Yes central planning is such a boon it bankrupted the Soviet Union - Are you really trying to hold up Ireland as a demonstration of failed Austrian theory? Good Lord. Peddle your wares elsewhere please adults are talking.

  • @xtop23 That awkward moment when the majority of former Soviet citizens say they were better off under that economy.

  • @SuperBenzid This isnt TYT Cenk please check your progressive bs at the door - Majority......really? Just because human memory is short and its quite difficult to have a populace remember clearly how things actually were under Russia's previous government incarnation doesn't negate the fact that it resulted in massive defense spending they could ill afford, bread lines, misallocation of capital, and human beings disappearing into the night. Again...... please stfu

  • @xtop23

    They have all those things under the current russian government too, except now the average person is much poorer due to capitalism. Something Ron Paul would tell you is impossible.

    Sorry he might be a dedicated principled individual but his economic principles do not hold out under the history of the real world.

    In American history central planning has been far more effective than free market solutions.

    Oh and I am more a Marxist than a progressive.

  • @SuperBenzid Name one rich country with centralized allocation of resources and capital. China had to open up to trade to even become above impoverished.

  • @maniswil2 America in WW1 and WW2 would be my example. China uses macro-economic plans and has grown quite well through the combination of them with state industries being subject to market forces. I am sure if China ceased being authoritarian but continued with its current economic model it would do pretty well for itself.

  • @SuperBenzid More effective at what ..... bankrupting a nation? Hello ..... were broke. Much poorer due to capitalism. You sure? Have you actually seen the median level of life quality associated with the pre-Gorbachev years? They would have to be walking in Glad bags to be appreciably worse off. At least now they can actually leave the country without an FSB badge. Time passing has engendered a look back nostalgia that simply is untrue.

  • @xtop23 We got this way under Greenspan who was mostly a free market guy. Btw lately he has changed his tune all but admitting free market policies have been a dissaster for America.

    De-regulation has increased market fluctuations dramatically. The last five years serve as absolute proof that capitalism is self destructive and will not work at all without regulation. It is a pathway to failure and Ron Paul's solution is only: do it more.

  • @SuperBenzid What de-regulation? its only been more and more regulation for the past 12 years

  • @AlpaDog1983

    Timeline of de-regulation:

    Alternative Mortgage Transactions Parity Act of 1982

    Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994

    Greenspan's re-interpretation of Glass-Steagall Act of 1996

    Financial Modernization Act of 1999

    Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000

    Consolidated Supervised Entities program of 2004

    Result:

    Out of control derivatives and mortgage trading. Loss of faith in "free market" policies by most economists who formerly held that position including me

  • @SuperBenzid

    You think these government acts are "de-regulations?" You must not be a very good economist.

  • @emmit127 Well they did de-regulate important markets like mortgages and derivatives. I honestly don't get your point?

  • @SuperBenzid

    No they didn't, by way of The Community Reinvestment Act, the government encouraged banks to give high risk mortgages to people who could not afford it. Preferably, my points will lead you back to the bridge you came from, but if you insist on spouting nonsensical, socialist talking points, I'll attempt to refute you.

  • @emmit127

    I never mentioned that act.

    So your disputing that the Financial Modernization Act didn't remove regulations put in place in Glass-Steagall? I am interested to know what your argument is?

    Please cease the ad hominem attacks they bore me.

  • @AlpaDog1983 Precisely +1

  • @SuperBenzid Greenspan a free market guy..... wtf, do you read what you write before you post it? The man that epitomizes crony capitalism and deficit spending? That is NOT a free market. You hold up the last 5 years of "de-regulation" as proof of the failure of capitalism? Obama has been in office for 3 + of those and he has continued a Bush era doctrine of massive INCREASES in regulation. Central..........planning.....­. doesn't........work !!!!! - fin~

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more