The dumb atheist moron returns! (Part 1)

[llewdebkram]

The problem I have with the bible is people cherry picking or interpreting phrases to suit their own religion, lifestyle or beliefs.

[aussieman332]

HAHAHA mountain of evidence for evolution.......HAHAHAHAHAHA..­.man nearly died from laughing, I have yet to see ANY EVIDENCE of evolution yet the bible has THOUSANDS of predictions which have come true. Once again another stupid kid who thinks he knows everything because some teacher said it is. What a FREAKIN MORON!!!!!!

[MomoTheBellyDancer]

@aussieman332

"I have yet to see ANY EVIDENCE of evolution"

That's because you're willfully ignoring it.

"the bible has THOUSANDS of predictions which have come tru"

Actually, the number is closer to zero. And no, self-fulfilling prophecies don't count.

[eleventysevens]

@aussieman332

wikipedia/wiki/Evidence_of_com­mon_descent

First result when Evidence of evolution is searched for on Google, you obviously haven't even tried.

[frankleeseaux]

@aussieman332 I highly recommend digging your head out of the sand, pulling your fingers from your ears, opening your eyes, and STOP waving your ass in the air like you just don't care. Reality does not disappear simply because you refuse to look at it. If one stands on the train tracks, in the path of an on-coming train and closes their eyes, the train may become invisible to them, but, that will not prevent them from being smeared across the tracks.

[Blawrg]

Holy shit, this was painful to watch. You sound like a shitty actor that's trying too hard. What makes it worse is you are completely serious.

[frankleeseaux]

@Blawrg It was blatantly obvious to me that this person was reading from a script... Ya, know? To be certain he didn't miss, or forget any of his points, he wished to make. Let's be glad he's a shitty actor... It shows his honesty and integrity. All an actor is, when it comes down to it, is a really good/convincing liar. No offense to the actors of the world. But, that is the job... to convince others well enough to suspend disbelief.

[Blawrg]

@frankleeseaux

Thanks for bringing me back to this video after 2 months, gave me a chance to laugh at it again.

[frosted1030]

Morality and law should have little to do with religion but judges still send people to AA.

[AbysmalCry]

What a bunch of garbage, a fruitless talk.

[indiemuzak]

Let them hold on to their athiesm. Maybe it will comfort them while they are in hell

[THISandTHISandTHAT]

You look like Kim Jonghyun from SHINee! Google him if you don't know who he is. This is a compliment too. : D

You're very intelligent, how old are you?

[gr00vi3guyz]

word. where do you think the origin of life came from? just curious

[TruthofthePeople]

@gr00vi3guyz Honestly there are theories that I personally do think are more likely than others. Abiogenesis to me is the most convincing although it is a fairly new area of science that hasn't been fully explored yet. Either way I personally believe that even though science has no current consensus in regards to the origin of life, we don't need to invoke the existence of the supernatural in order to explain what we don't understand - at least until there is evidence...

[kiafar]

@TruthofthePeople Can i just ask you,

WHY THE FUCK DO YOU SAY WE?

you are alone.

[SuperSam424]

God exists. You're just a small child puppet who has been religiously indoctrinated by the atheistic secular world. Evolution is in no way "proven" or "fact". It's a theory. It only recieved that title so the "scientific community" can amp up it's credibility using false implications and blantant lies. You study propaganda and assume you speak truth. That's your flaw. This world is run by modernday villians. More of this is true than you think.

[FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7]

@SuperSam424 "god exist" bold statement, can you back it up? evolution is not atheism and evolution is proven.

[SuperSam424]

@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1. Yeah, PM me for that. 2. Evolution is proven? This is a lie and false, even in the eyes of the secular world. Do not just assert false things.

[FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7]

@SuperSam424 the secular/real world accepts it. it is not false, look it up....you probably have no idea what it is.

what are:

natural selection, genetic drift, random mutations?

[SuperSam424]

@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 False. The SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY does NOT "accept it" as FACT. Only IGNORANT GROUPS of humans such as yourself who create conclusions by their desires. You're testing me? Little boy. You don't know who you're talking to.

[FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7]

@SuperSam424 99.85% of biologists accept evolution, so what are you talking about? only you are in an ignorant, the group wit no scientist. the only thing little is your brain, and i know who i am talking too, a creationist moron.

[SuperSam424]

@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1. ONLY biologists. There s more to life than the biology. Especially the atheistic agenda "scientific community" "biologists" 2. You made up that stat--even if you didn't--it's an obvious propagated LIE. 3. "Group with no scientists"???? Stupid child. Science is a process for finding structure. NOT A STANCE. WE have REASON to have FAITH in JESUS. YOU have NO REASONS for ANYTHING you believe. You only have FAITH in COINCIDENCES. And A LOT of them. Sit down.

[FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7]

@SuperSam424 only 99.85 of biologist? what is that supposed to mean? the deal with biology. on top of that most of scientists accept it too. i made up nothing. how is it a lie, because you don't like the fact? i'm not stupid, i am atheist. religion is a stance, not science. you have no reason to believe in a magical zombie carpenter. i have reason to believe in facts, with evidence. you need help

[SuperSam424]

@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 FALSE. it is a lie because I'm assuming you got that "fact" from some group with an obvious atheistic agenda like most of the "scientific communities" in the world. I am Christian--not in the organized "religion" sense like catholocism and atheism. FALSE AGAIN. There is no such thing as an atheist that came to their conclusion through REASON and LOGIC. Whats your epistimology??? You can't answer that because you DONT USE REASON.

[FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7]

@SuperSam424 "atheist"? no, scientific. you need to get the idea that scientists are not good. atheost have a LACK of belief and even the ones that go and say there is not a god use there brain, notice how they are smarter. now u use reason to prove ur religion.

[SuperSam424]

@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 I never said "scientists are not good". Read my words not what you THINK my nonexistant hidden prejudice is. And FALSE. Atheists need MORE faith to be atheists than theists. It is a religion. It attempts to explain the origin of the universe with the pathetic "We don't know (false humility) but we know it isn't God". Shut up. Sit down. Use your brain.

[FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7]

@SuperSam424 atheist have no faith, they dont even claim anything.

religion just makes things up and goes against all science, science explains something and the christian says "what came before that" and "you dont know everything about it" when we know enough to prove something, like the earth no being created by a sky daddy, and evolution being true.

[SuperSam424]

@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 Exactly. They claim not to claim anything. Everything else you wrote "religion makes stuff up and all theists are just antiscience" is bullshit. It is bullshit because it is full of assumptions. Study your world NOT YOUR FACADE. Airheaded, puppet.

[SuperSam424]

@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 Exactly. They claim not to claim anything. Everything else you wrote "religion makes stuff up and all theists are just antiscience" is bullshit. It is bullshit because it is full of assumptions. Study your world NOT YOUR FACADE. And STOP REITERATING CLICHE ATHEIST ASSUMPTION/ARGUMENTS. dawkins and hitches are not intellectual people to look up to. They are paid to fool masses--mostly through emotion. Airheaded, puppet.

[FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7]

@SuperSam424 who is the side that does not accept evolution and global warming, i rest my case.

[SuperSam424]

@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 Yeah, your rest your case for it to die. Those assumptions are just DUMB.

[FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7]

@SuperSam424 the right wing does not think they are true

[SuperSam424]

@FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 That's because "the right wing" is nothing but false "Christians". We live in a world where the right get it wrong and the left don't get it. STOP PUTTING LABELS ON THINGS. IT IS MAKING YOU STUPID.

[PivAd123]

@SuperSam424 this comment made me laugh. hahahahaha.

[gr00vi3guyz]

i don't think he represents the creation arguement at all. and just throwing this in, natural selection isnt the same as evolution even though its labeled as evolution. when does a species change to another species from natural selection? natural selection just uses the variety that is in the animals DNA already. which leads to my second point that its hard to find cases in which DNA gains information through mutations rather then the common loss of information. that's just my opinion.

[TruthofthePeople]

@gr00vi3guyz I don't recall saying that natural selection is the same thing as evolution although if I did, then I wish to clarify this point.

DNA does not always have to gain information in order to increase survivability. Mutations are also only one influential factor (although rather important) that can affect the variability in the genetic code between two generations of a species.

[eleventysevens]

@gr00vi3guyz What do you even mean when you say gain in information? That doesn't really make any sense, You can have mutations in genes that cause additions or deletions of sections of the sequences. When these genes are translated into proteins, because of the changed genetic sequence, these proteins will be slightly different to the rest of the population. This has a higher chance of surviving if the protein performs its job better than the wild type. This is utterly basic biology read a book

[JudgeXII]

Also, if you'd like to make a point then I wouldn't generalize all Christians. I believe generalization is where ALL of these problems stem from. There are ones like me who don't see atheists as different people or wrong or evil... until you start attacking religion.. isn't the point of atheism free thinking? Isn't the point of free thinking to let yourself and others think what they want? Point in case, not all of we Christians are so biased like this other guy.

[JudgeXII]

Just because you can make your tone of voice sound (what Americans consider to be nowadays) smarter than the other guy and scoff egotistically at his responses doesn't mean you're right. Christians shouldn't attack atheists, and vice versa.. it leads to this youtube crap.

[TruthofthePeople]

@JudgeXII I beg your pardon? I never 'scoffed' at this person's claims without providing sufficient evidence to support my indignation. I have every right to attack Christians as they have every right to attack me. He could make a video response if he wanted to, he just chose not to.

I never claimed I was right. Feel free to check my sources in the description and judge for yourself.

[JudgeXII]

@TruthofthePeople Read my second paragraph I didn't say you couldn't defend yourself. It's just sad to see the world in a state of affairs. As for the scoffing.. I just think that you could come across as a little humbler. Save the fancy linguistics for the smart people, (clearly not this other guy).

[TruthofthePeople]

@JudgeXII Ah my apologies. Didn't see the second part of your response.

I understand what you mean when you say I could be a bit more humble. However, while I wish I could show some niceties.... it isn't something that can be shown all the time. And I express every bit of my disgust and anger at every ounce of bigotry he decided to put in this video response.

[JudgeXII]

@TruthofthePeople I apologize if this message ends up being a second response to what you just sent me, my internet messes up a bit. Read my second paragraph I didn't say you couldn't defend yourself. This guy attacked first, was my guess, but it's a sad state of affairs this world is in where we can't just learn to stop caring about what other people think. As for the scoffing, I just think you could sound humbler, and save the fancy linguistics for somebody smarter (clearly not this guy).

[TruthofthePeople]

@JudgeXII Ah now I see, and my apologies. And no I don't really 'care' what MF thinks, I just care that he's spreading deliberate misinformation and bigotry all over the internet. Deliberate misinformation...being the lying about evolution and as for the bigotry...see the second part. I see what you mean by sounding humble, and while my disgust and anger might have made me seem more arrogant, that is not my intention.

Thank you for taking the time to comment.

[beautyinbreakdowns2]

This poor mysticalforrest guy is a victim. Everybody should watch JESUS CAMP, it's how morons are made. Its on YouTube and also Netflix for free. More and more I think we need to treat these people as delusional, in a clinical way. They're in a kind of echo chamber where their delusion just gets continuously reinforced. We have to help them escape for all our sakes so that we can progress as a species.

[KelferMookie]

Asians look like little animals, evolution must be real... C'mon nobody can tell me asians look like humans.

[DodoPandemic]

"I did plenty of research....for years!" OMG it's Nephy illegitemate son.

[Canadionfool2]

I thought asians were supposed to be smart

[TheLamas408]

@Canadionfool2 Not only was that prejudice but dumb of a comment, this guy obviously knows about evolution and is smarter than the other guy. So bug off idiot.

[800adam008]

youre both fucking faggots

[metalsusa1]

Mysticalforest needs to get some sun. He looks like he might have rickets from lack of vitamin D.

[metalsusa1]

Can I give an interesting observation. When I first started watching this video I thought "truthofthepeople" was the theist arguing for theism. So I was hating on him till I watched a little more and realized he was arguing for evolution and science.

It's interesting how my preconceived assumptions caused my anger towards him.

[calmreason]

Why do you debate retards?

This guy is still paddling in the shallow end of the gene pool. Give him another 30,000 years and if his genes are still around, he might get it!

[TruthofthePeople]

@calmreason While he may not listen, there are those that deserve a chance to hear the truth.

Also, it's hella fun....though exhausting and fruitless at times.

[AmorphicS]

Anyone who uses 2 adjectives to describe someone negatively is not worth listening to.

[arthurneddysmith]

Hey Jesus-boy,

You ARE ignorant ... and stupid. The proof is here:

You require evidence to accept what is currently a scientific consensus: evolution. And when presented with that evidence, you ask for more, and more, and more.

Contrast this with whatever comes from a violent, ancient text and all of a sudden, your evidential requirements are dropped:

A magical sky daddy merely requires faith.

[whiteliketar]

Why do a lot atheists seem

[dvdlogitech]

THIS IS SO DUUUUUUUUMB

[retrogamerist]

@AnonymousReasons lol

[PULSEofNY10]

God does exist if he didnt then where did we come from, pre historic bacteria? i mean just think about what ur saying, u guys just sound impossibly stupid

[AnonymousReasons]

@PULSEofNY10 No, of course not, we came from dirt. Haven't you read your bible.

[gardener68]

MysticalForest is a bigot.

[BotBlink94]

I find you very attractive ;)

[Belovedtita25]

Its so simple thats what it comes down to , being human , having a heart to help one another in any way possible... Whether youre atheist or not , what does your religion bring to the world? Because atheism is a beleif...what do you preach?

[AnonymousReasons]

@Belovedtita25 You can't preach atheism, you can only explain why you are an atheist. There is no text that explains atheism any further than the disbelief in gods, and deities, because that is all it is. Now, this may affect your personal opinion, but so do political views. We are affected by all our senses, our experiences in life, and the environment we grow up in; to blame people for who they are because of what they believe in is just judging someone without knowing them.

[Belovedtita25]

Its sad people on this world are becoming more hateful towards one another, theres so much poverty and people that struggle with drug addiction, rape , murder.. Wake up to the the unfortunate people that need help, both physically and emotionally, but no, you waste your time bashin the ones that preach love for one another as jesus did..so sad stop the selflessness!!

[TruthofthePeople]

@Belovedtita25 I agree with you in the sense that a lack of evidence is not equal to a lack of existence. The burden of proof is still on Christians to prove that God does exist - with tangible, testable evidence. Atheism is NOT a belief or a religion, but a lack of a belief. I think what you mean is that atheism is a worldview? The atheist worldview is that we find no credible evidence for the proof of the existence of a deity or deities. Every other belief is arbitrary.

[Belovedtita25]

@TruthofthePeople I read in an article that scientists beleive from looking at creation ,there has to be an intelligent designer that made it. ( product of design) what is your take on this ? ( evolutionist like Richard Dawkins admit the design in living things ..( he does not beleive the designer is a God though) ..it goes on to say that if natural selection and mutations are eliminated as mechanisms to produce the information and design of living systems , then another source must be found..

[TruthofthePeople]

@Belovedtita25 Scientists? What scientists exactly? Has this idea been peer reviewed?

True, if natural selection and mutation are eliminated in living systems, then there isn't much left to work with. But....so what? We DO know exactly how natural selection can form certain elements that might seem like a complex design. It's been a verified fact for years.

I don't believe in an intelligent designer, although I am open to the possibility if there is any credible evidence to back it up.

[razrX]

@Belovedtita25 and what are you and your jesus buddies exactly doing to help all those suffering people?!?! praying?!?! do you think that theres more people suffering today then 2000y ago? or during the spanish inquisition perhaps..?

[Belovedtita25]

@razrX Helping those who are hungry, homeless, addicted to drugs, yes is that a start? All the missionaries that go out and medicate , feed , heal these broken souls because their own people will not help them , not even their own government, would you do this? I hope so.. Most people dont even acknowledge one another in america , let alone help them in any way they can, its not only by donating money but actually acknowleding their existence that is ignored by others.

[razrX]

@Belovedtita25 oh do you think so... I dont see the hand of the church helping that much...can you point me a single place where christians are doing all of these things youre claiming? Do you know doctors without borders?

[Belovedtita25]

@SUlax1017 Why do you have to curse? Such vulgur language , why such anger? Just because there is no proof suitable to you doesnt make it false..i beleive with all my heart in God almighty something your opinion has no power to destroy and never will... But God has mercy on all of us :) your harsh words and feelings have no power .. Love is stronger than hate

[AnonymousReasons]

@Belovedtita25 My problem with the whole God concept is that it all is based off a book with missing pages. In one conversation, I said maybe there is a god, but we know nothing about it. Soon after that, I got a reply saying we know God through his son, and through the stories of the bible. Outside the bible, what is there to say anything from that book ever happened? And why should I believe in this god, and not someone else's god. Allah seems just as real as your god to me.

[AnonymousReasons]

@Belovedtita25 And by using the word "love", and saying that it is stronger than hate is an old cliche. It's partly true, as more is created through strong affection towards another, rather than with hate. When two people of the opposite sex come together, than can reproduce, and have a child. When two people come together, and kill each other, they both lie dead. Much more can be produced from a group than from one man, alone. But if God promotes love, then never hate, because in his kingdom...

[AnonymousReasons]

@Belovedtita25 ...only love can exist. If God was ever angered, or showed jealousy, then he is not understanding. How can we as humans be more complex than God, he is all powerful, and all knowing, but does nothing. If God is everything science has discovered, and more, than he is not what your bible says he is. The bible describes him as a being that can speak, and also use telepathy, and is able to make virgins give birth without the need of intercourse. I have no reason to believe in God.

[retrogamerist]

You should change the title to " Reasonably logical and intelligent atheist returns"

[Glad1kun]

Douchebag



[lasoogneypubes]

Ok if God is real and Earth is the only planet with life on it then why the fuck did he create such a vast universe with countless planets? Why would he waste his time?

[Belovedtita25]

yes, the word of God CAN and DOES explain it , but its up to each person to accept it or reject it . its a personal relationship , I just like to comment a different way to view our differences , but I see alot of Pride and mocking from alot of atheits , but outside of religion or science , how do you see yourself as a person? what are your morals ? where do you get your morals from ? comapssion? happiness etc ( you get the point ) :)

[TruthofthePeople]

@Belovedtita25 Do you mind if I answer in a PM? If you are really curious to know my answer, I think it will take more than 500 words...

[SUlax1017]

@Belovedtita25 dont try to bullshit, there is no proof of any existance of a higher being and there neever will be

[Belovedtita25]

Try praying to him , and you learn from experience , come to Jesus .. Do you ask for proof of emotions? Is it just hormones and chemicals? Do you really trust the scientists that come up with " evidence" whose side or they on? Dont let deceit harden your hearts, experiment yourselves :) God have mercy !

[TruthofthePeople]

@Belovedtita25 Yes I trust the scientists that come up with evidence because science produces results we can quantify. I'm sorry to say the same thing cannot be said for prayer, nor the belief in a god.

The problem with prayer is that it is simply arbitrary. I could say that I pray to the Invisible Pink Unicorn and that's 'experience' for you.

Just because science cannot explain something, doesn't mean your religion can. If you think your god is real, why not back it up with evidence?

[journeyer58]

What in the hell, does accepting responsibility for one's actions have to do with the veracity of evolution by natural selection? There is no evidence for a geological event like a flood or evidence that Noah even existed. Do they actually believe that a deity, could create anything let alone a universe filled with galaxies? Do these morons actually believe that bronze age goat herders could understand the complexities of the universe? If so, where do they get the facts to support their belief?

[retrogamerist]

@journeyer58 the thing is, a deity couldnt create the universe, nothing in this universe can create matter. it would defy the laws of physics

[AnonymousReasons]

@retrogamerist In a joking way, I told my friend I had discovered that God was described as infinite, and that it's obvious he created everything from himself. He agreed, but then I told him there was no evidence to prove God was infinite either, let alone exist.

[TruthofthePeople]

@Porsche911GT3RSCUP I don't use a script whenever I make videos...

[A5Hellcat]

@TruthofthePeople I think he means that ytou are looking at your screen not your camera. To better engage the audience should mounth the camera where when you look at your screen that you appear toi be looking at the audience.

But thats just my two cents

I enjoyed the vid, hope to see more

[conradpilapil]

I'm off to watch tv.. "Being Human" is about to come on.. lets continue this via personal messages if you wish.. we can have longer trains of thoughts.. I really enjoy this. In the end, very likely that we will still not agree .. but it should prove to be entertaining for both of us.

[conradpilapil]

lol.. you are too funny with this "know it all" attitude!! lol.. I do hope I was not as bad as you when I was your age. Further more.. I see fossils thrown around in the comments a lot.. fossils are not evidence for evolution, it is not transitional, nor do we know it was an ancestor to anything. What we do know is it died.

[TruthofthePeople]

@conradpilapil Every fossil is by definition a transitional form (from one generation to another). I don't know what else I can tell you other than... consult a biology textbook? 

[conradpilapil]

@TruthofthePeople you mean the same texbooks that talk about geological columns but have no actual record of it in real life.. the text books that tell you layers are dated by the fossils found in them, and then tell you that fossils are dated by the layer they are found in? (circle reasoning). Careful young mind.. not everything you read gives you a full and accurate account. Not to mention many evolutionist have stated that fossils don't count for proof. Look it up.

[TruthofthePeople]

@conradpilapil Not...quite. Fossils are often dated according to which layer it was found in. Geometric layers are dated with radiometric dating. Where's the circular reasoning in that?

Fossils are very much proof of evolution. Hardly conclusive, mind you, but proof nevertheless. Might I also mention evidence in the form of DNA sequencing, observed speciation, homologous traits, etc? Scientists do not solely rely on the fossil record.

Evolution is observable, testable, provable science.

[conradpilapil]

@TruthofthePeople Don't give me and the rest of the audience half truths. Yes, One way they date layers is by radiometric dating.. but don't do that to live turtles.. some come up thousands of years old.. pretty good accuracy? I think not. A common way to date layers is to see what fossils are found in the layer. Evolution is NOT observable, testable or provable.. otherwise if you could do that.. go for it.. you would be the most famous in this field. lol.. seriously, too funny.

[TruthofthePeople]

@conradpilapil Hey, don't take my word for it - go look it up yourself? Observed speciation seems like a good place to start considering how you are under the misconception that evolution has never been observed.

While you're at it - I've already mentioned that the fossil record is only a bonus. There is an ABUNDANCE of evidence (see list mentioned above) even without relying on the fossil record or radiometric dating.

Scientists have already proven evolution. Only people like to ignore it...

[conradpilapil]

@TruthofthePeople I have.. you get to my age and have the thirst for knowledge and not look this stuff up. Look, in short.. your evolution theory is done with one thing.. polonium halos .. done! All the rebuttal to this is irrelevant since its life span is VERY short.. and so we should not have bubble or halos under evolution. Willful ignorance never pays off, in this argument or in real life application.

[TruthofthePeople]

@conradpilapil Quite frankly, you sound an awful lot like a troll considering how you blatantly accuse me of not doing my research while not supporting any of your arguments with any evidence of your own.

I don't want to sound rude, and I appreciate criticism when necessary, but you don't sound willing to learn. I will not give a platform of credibility to a creationist who doesn't have the intellectual honesty to do his or her own research. Sorry.

[conradpilapil]

@TruthofthePeople now that is funny, you accuse me of not willing to learn? .. from you? You assume you are right.. I've already question your intellectual honesty by attacking your ideas (not you) on the fossils, geological column.. ect. and all you do in return is point back to the flawed "textbook" for more. So far, you have no proof of what you believe can be scientifically proven. No scientist has been able to do this.. let alone you.

[TruthofthePeople]

@conradpilapil You accuse me of being a 'young mind', possibly because you think I'm not experienced enough to understand these concepts and maybe I am. But you might want to be careful with that accusation seeing as MANY atheists follow this line of thinking - atheists much older and more professionally educated than I.

Unfortunately, you leave me with no reason as to why I should ignore all credible evidence presented by scientists in favor of an untestable faith-based theory like a god.

[conradpilapil]

@TruthofthePeople no.. a young mind is not a negative accusation.. just facts. I can name brilliant minds while in their youth. However, you might what to practice critical thinking... that involves thinking for yourself, not just repeating what you read in your textbook. I'm sure your interest in this subject has forced you to ignore the constant corrections on the evolution theory. ei.. the age of the earth, geological column, genetic mutations, 2nd law of thermodynamics..

[jo3jo3221]

@ThetruthofthePeople do you have any proof of transitional fossils

[TruthofthePeople]

@jo3jo3221 Every fossil is technically a 'transitional form'. But I get your point - just search up ANY family tree of virtually any organism. You'll see PLENTY of transitional forms.

Might I also add that the fossil record isn't the only proof of macroevolution?

[jo3jo3221]

@TruthofthePeople I said macro is untested, even Darwin said if there was not a TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL found within 100 yrs of his theory, than dont count his theory as a credible one. I know evolution is true, I just dont support it from the standpoint of all lifeforms from 1 single cell

[TruthofthePeople]

@jo3jo3221 Macroevolution is untested and very much the "theory" part creationists love to pick up. However, just because it is untested does NOT mean that there is no evidence for it. Macroevolution is just a lot of microevolution over a much longer period of time - hence why I said it is impossible to believe in one without believing in the other.

[jo3jo3221]

@TruthofthePeople I would love a debate too



[jo3jo3221]

@TruthofthePeople its funny, the evolutionist who supports macroevolution is talking about untestable things lol

[TruthofthePeople]

@jo3jo3221 I don't understand. How could you believe in microevolution but not macro? They are the same thing - in just a different timescale.

"Untestable" meaning what now? Evolution has been observed AND tested. The evidence is there - in the fossil record, genetics, observed speciation, etc. You can chose not to accept it if you want to but please don't say it is "untestable" because that's a lie. Evolution is observable, testable and provable science.

[DerrenBrown100]

Atheism FTW

[yonigga223]

3:44 You have the understanding of a human being, not of a God. While your reaction to the tragedy itself could be warranted, you have no business questioning the will or understanding of a multidimensional super being Like the christian God. Take a deep breath as you read this and think about it.

[TruthofthePeople]

@yonigga223 Good point.

I will address this point in a later video.

[Thandi123]

@yonigga223

God is supposed to have the understanding of a multidimensional super being and not that of a human being, therefore by your logic he would have no business questioning the will or understanding of any of us.

So much for the concept of sin.

[RainCityBlues]

POWNAGE

[RealBibletruth]

hi truth i think i inboxed you about a debate. why not, it'd be fun :)

[TruthofthePeople]

@RealBibletruth Oh...yeah sorry I didn't respond. For some odd reason, youtube didn't show your message in my inbox until yesterday o___o

And although I would be all for a debate....unfortunately that might have to wait until the summer when I have a little more free time on my hands.

[RealBibletruth]

@TruthofthePeople yh that'd be great i would have more time as-well but in england our summer starts july 18th i think later than america but yh GL with your studies God bless.

[ZRadach]

damn... this guy (mysticalforest) made himself look TERRIBLE.

hopefully he learned something

[TruthofthePeople]

@ZRadach we can only hope....

[kpopjpopdotcom]

I hit the like button.

[Dar0A0Nakk]

You should of played Weird Al's 'Dare To Be Stupid' at the end

[saria11121]

Wow... I can't believe he called *you* an idiot. Just wow.

[ADDMeetsInsomnia]

Kudos to you for not laughing the entire video. Wow, what a dumb ass. As Bill Maher said, "Evolution is not an issue. It's just scientists versus non-scientists and since the topic is SCIENCE, the non-scientists don't get a vote." Congrats on pissing him off though. lol That's a huge step as an online atheist. ;) Or so I've been told.

[TruthofthePeople]

@ADDMeetsInsomnia Thanks lol... I don't see how I pissed him off though considering I never really insulted him or his beliefs in my previous video to him.

[SCRulerShinoda]

He actually attacked you? Why is it that everyone ignores me?

[supersmash43]

I am still being skepticial about MysticalForest not being a poe.

[sk6mix]

Great video.....thanks for the pwnage. Can't wait for part 2.......Finish Him!!!!!

[YesIamJames]

Can't wait till bpart 2 btw.

[YesIamJames]

I'm beginning to think that MF is a poe. It's har to believe someone is that dumb.

[TruthofthePeople]

@YesIamJames ...nah even a poe wouldn't take it THIS far... he's genuine.

[Texemosis]

lol can't wait to see you comment on his whole shit and piss idea. Seriously, he doesn't actually think Atheists believe we exist to eat shit and piss does he?