Thanks for the mind-expanding commentary KC. It seems typical in modern GM play that once a player feels that their opponent is gaining a space advantage, rather than retreat and submit to a passive position, the defender sacs pawns in order to fight for the initiative. The exception to this I think is Petrosian. I definitly want to see more contemporary games like this. But I would also like to see some KC commented examples of how Petrosian defends these types of positions.
GM's never make each other play out the mate with a knight and bishop. I know it's like an unwritten law they have with each other (kind of an honour thing) but you generally can't afford to make one mistake with the 50 move rule in effect. I would love to see a master like Carlsen knock it out just once in tournament play. It's so precise and beautiful.
Nh4! Wow, what a cruel move, denying the king the possibility to herd the pawn. Inspiring stuff. I haven't been following Tata personally this year, so i would love if you can cover some more of the interesting games.
Carlsen's blog. ". I must admit I wasn't sure what was going on in the opening but managed to find some good moves. Aronian, who is 2nd ranked in the world, tried to create activity without really succeeding. I had a winning position when I went for 34.exf7+ (instead of winning the exchange with e7) and had calculated the game continuation with bishop and knight against rook until his 43.....g5! which I had missed. I thought white should still be winning although it was a very complicated ending
@sxaletalon4 Finding weaknesses in your own won games may be one of the things Carlsen learned from Kasparov. The big guy himself said too many players only tried to find mistakes if they lost ;-/
This game is the best so fare. And I must say; its not fair to underestimate these guys in comparison with immortals like Kasparov, Fischer or Tal. These old world champions did'nt have any engine-capacity hanging over their shoulders to blanch their glory. Nowadays even amateurs like me can take a look at the games and say: "that was stupid"(read: less clever).
Brilliant commentary. But what on earth was Carlsen's thinking in rejecting e7?
e7 Rxd5, e8=Q Qxe8, Qxd5. Then if Rxa2, Rde1 virtually forces Qa8, Qx Rx, Ra1. Looks pretty simple to calculate, and pretty simple to play from there.
I like that game too but there will be surely another interesting games coming up. However, i found a quite interesting game from the Mtel Masters 2005 Ponomariov vs Topalov with e00 (catalan opening) where Ponomariov won, unfortunately i cannot post the url but im sure if you are interested you will find it on chessgames com. would love it. greetings.
Comment removed
tatasteeljamshedpur 2 weeks ago
u talk too much, make it a 20min game
Spartan2288 1 month ago
Thanks for your nice way of anayse
motornade 1 month ago
Brilliant again!!!
Please, cover two best games of 9th round: Nakalov-Topamura & Carlakin-Karjsen.
Just kidding:D Respect!
Both games were amazing, Topalov's opening and Karjakin's possition..
PLEASE.
ohorok2 1 month ago 3
Great video KC. Thanks
GordonChess 1 month ago
Thanks for posting.....brilliant commentary......
The positional calculus of Magnus will be a mystery for the novice.....but the end game beauty/genius is transparent....
quillendaniel 1 month ago
Brilliant end game sequence !
quillendaniel 1 month ago
cruel was the right word to describe that knight manoeuvre at the end lol!
trixapete 1 month ago
That endgame sequence was truly masterly. Thanks for the play-by KC.
kaewonf8 1 month ago
Thanks for the mind-expanding commentary KC. It seems typical in modern GM play that once a player feels that their opponent is gaining a space advantage, rather than retreat and submit to a passive position, the defender sacs pawns in order to fight for the initiative. The exception to this I think is Petrosian. I definitly want to see more contemporary games like this. But I would also like to see some KC commented examples of how Petrosian defends these types of positions.
Chesscoach8 1 month ago
Beautiful. Please keep doing these as muchas you can. It's always nice to watch commentary on games played by the greatest chess players of our time.
Amazing caculation by Carlsen if he did see all of that from exf7+; and I have no doubt he did.
thanks for the commentary KC.
Nola213 1 month ago
GM's never make each other play out the mate with a knight and bishop. I know it's like an unwritten law they have with each other (kind of an honour thing) but you generally can't afford to make one mistake with the 50 move rule in effect. I would love to see a master like Carlsen knock it out just once in tournament play. It's so precise and beautiful.
EClein2 1 month ago
@EClein2 Yea I would have liked to see how well Magnus remembered the knight and bishop mating sequence.
Minkki82 1 month ago
@Minkki82 Magnus couldn't play chess at age five.
viharsarok 14 hours ago
Nh4! Wow, what a cruel move, denying the king the possibility to herd the pawn. Inspiring stuff. I haven't been following Tata personally this year, so i would love if you can cover some more of the interesting games.
SuperAkaras 1 month ago
Carlsen's blog. ". I must admit I wasn't sure what was going on in the opening but managed to find some good moves. Aronian, who is 2nd ranked in the world, tried to create activity without really succeeding. I had a winning position when I went for 34.exf7+ (instead of winning the exchange with e7) and had calculated the game continuation with bishop and knight against rook until his 43.....g5! which I had missed. I thought white should still be winning although it was a very complicated ending
sxaletalon4 1 month ago 11
@sxaletalon4 It is always great to hear from the players themselves - cheers.
kingscrusher 1 month ago
@sxaletalon4 Finding weaknesses in your own won games may be one of the things Carlsen learned from Kasparov. The big guy himself said too many players only tried to find mistakes if they lost ;-/
skinnyjohnsen 1 month ago
Great video! That was some gorgeous endgame technique by Carlsen.
8minutesofarc 1 month ago
Brilliant endgame technique by Carlsen =D Nice commentary as always KC ;)
Immortalassassin1 1 month ago
Aronian - Naka is the best so far
gabadiel 1 month ago
This game is the best so fare. And I must say; its not fair to underestimate these guys in comparison with immortals like Kasparov, Fischer or Tal. These old world champions did'nt have any engine-capacity hanging over their shoulders to blanch their glory. Nowadays even amateurs like me can take a look at the games and say: "that was stupid"(read: less clever).
gunuffimoo 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
This has been flagged as spam show
Brilliant commentary. But what on earth was Carlsen's thinking in rejecting e7?
e7 Rxd5, e8=Q Qxe8, Qxd5. Then if Rxa2, Rde1 virtually forces Qa8, Qx Rx, Ra1. Looks pretty simple to calculate, and pretty simple to play from there.
thespacialone 1 month ago
Comment removed
thespacialone 1 month ago
Thanks for another amazing video!
I love ur commentary!
Fpires92 1 month ago
What do you think about Magnus Carlsen?Is he on the way to become the greatest ever?Greetings from Brazil !
skidmore7 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
I like that game too but there will be surely another interesting games coming up. However, i found a quite interesting game from the Mtel Masters 2005 Ponomariov vs Topalov with e00 (catalan opening) where Ponomariov won, unfortunately i cannot post the url but im sure if you are interested you will find it on chessgames com. would love it. greetings.
chessdeity 1 month ago
Aronian vs Nakamura Round 2. I love that game, I'd love a commentary about it! :)
Riggzilla 1 month ago