Can you imagine what an example it would set for the world if we were able to find a way to live in peace in Israel/Palestine? All the pieces of the puzzle are there: a shared monotheistic tradition, a shared land, and shared interests.We are closer to actualizing this than most people realize.Peace is in the best interest of all parties involved...it is a non-zero sum game.May G-d bless us with the wisdom to see clearly that peace is a matter of creating the conditions for mutual prosperity
I have bought this theory. Realism is the TRUTH!!! I looked back on history and there are no obvious inconsistencies between realist observation and observable facts. Liberalism is woefully inadequate and constructivism is a toddler who hasn't even learnt the names of things!!
@dambature: All of these theories are the "TRUTH." They all work, but none of them work that well alone. All of them "observe" history well; none of them predict history well (e.g. fall of the Berlin wall or the USSR). Constructivism is still a method, not a theory, and thankfully hasn't been thrown out with the bath-water before it has gotten to be a "toddler." It's impossible to ignore all the other theories in our complex world that is no longer (if ever) simply billiard balls.
I love being able to sit back, relax, listen, and take in the concepts without the strain that reading puts on my eyes. Thank you for posting these videos UCtelevision.
It's sad how people are still stucked in the Left/Right paradigm. Both systems are just two flavors of the same thing, centralized power to rob us clean and give it to the few. Oligarchies are happy with either of them. The greatest billionairs were created by the communist system. Stolichnaya vodka anyone? The product is created using slave labor and the $ goes to offshore banks. They just get the power promising things to the ppl and once they get it , it all goes to their cronies. Wake up!
I really agree with Mearsheimer and I wish that people who fall into the usual categories like socialists, anarchists, libertarian, right wing conservatives and so on, would come out of their ossified frames and get interested in ideas that transcend such categories.
The reason for the lack of aggression from Japan, Germany, Great Britain, Korea, France and Russia is not american armies in the region. I find this argument weak!
Taking into account norms and ideas is a Constructivist view of International Relations. Realists, like Mearsheimer, don't place much value of norms or ideas in their theory.
Johns arguments about the USA regional hegemony in west Hampshire its quite true that usa can't be the police of the world but can have influence alliance with other regional actors, , the question i have is when states are analyzing their foreign policy do they consider they findings in realist thoughts?
Leaders probably follow their perceived self-interest. Perceived yes, as it is influenced by their norms and ideas on the world.
So yeah, I disagree with Maersheimer, but do think his perspective is a very useful as a perspective on the world and it explains a lot of why the world is at is.
If University of California is at Berkeley, then what is UCLA?
MWSARSCA 3 months ago
orgasmic international relations lecture
alilapointe1 6 months ago
Can you imagine what an example it would set for the world if we were able to find a way to live in peace in Israel/Palestine? All the pieces of the puzzle are there: a shared monotheistic tradition, a shared land, and shared interests.We are closer to actualizing this than most people realize.Peace is in the best interest of all parties involved...it is a non-zero sum game.May G-d bless us with the wisdom to see clearly that peace is a matter of creating the conditions for mutual prosperity
tikkunolam613 10 months ago 4
I have bought this theory. Realism is the TRUTH!!! I looked back on history and there are no obvious inconsistencies between realist observation and observable facts. Liberalism is woefully inadequate and constructivism is a toddler who hasn't even learnt the names of things!!
dambature 1 year ago
@dambature: All of these theories are the "TRUTH." They all work, but none of them work that well alone. All of them "observe" history well; none of them predict history well (e.g. fall of the Berlin wall or the USSR). Constructivism is still a method, not a theory, and thankfully hasn't been thrown out with the bath-water before it has gotten to be a "toddler." It's impossible to ignore all the other theories in our complex world that is no longer (if ever) simply billiard balls.
pennstatedan 1 year ago 5
I love being able to sit back, relax, listen, and take in the concepts without the strain that reading puts on my eyes. Thank you for posting these videos UCtelevision.
jrm21386 1 year ago 8
@jrm21386 haha i know what you mean. this has made my revision much more enjoyable!
eddy33100 1 year ago
Good stuff, thanks UC
chrisocony 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's sad how people are still stucked in the Left/Right paradigm. Both systems are just two flavors of the same thing, centralized power to rob us clean and give it to the few. Oligarchies are happy with either of them. The greatest billionairs were created by the communist system. Stolichnaya vodka anyone? The product is created using slave labor and the $ goes to offshore banks. They just get the power promising things to the ppl and once they get it , it all goes to their cronies. Wake up!
MindEyesOpen 1 year ago
Comment removed
MindEyesOpen 1 year ago
Comment removed
MindEyesOpen 1 year ago
Comment removed
MindEyesOpen 1 year ago
Comment removed
MindEyesOpen 1 year ago
Comment removed
MindEyesOpen 1 year ago
This is really a great interview to listen to. I'm learning a lot from this. Definitly worth watching.
Scrollerman 1 year ago
I really agree with Mearsheimer and I wish that people who fall into the usual categories like socialists, anarchists, libertarian, right wing conservatives and so on, would come out of their ossified frames and get interested in ideas that transcend such categories.
dandiacal 1 year ago
The reason for the lack of aggression from Japan, Germany, Great Britain, Korea, France and Russia is not american armies in the region. I find this argument weak!
tygge2000 1 year ago
Taking into account norms and ideas is a Constructivist view of International Relations. Realists, like Mearsheimer, don't place much value of norms or ideas in their theory.
maverick7919 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
excellent work!
1888junkteam 2 years ago
excellent work!
1888junkteam 2 years ago
Johns arguments about the USA regional hegemony in west Hampshire its quite true that usa can't be the police of the world but can have influence alliance with other regional actors, , the question i have is when states are analyzing their foreign policy do they consider they findings in realist thoughts?
somalipeace 3 years ago
Leaders probably follow their perceived self-interest. Perceived yes, as it is influenced by their norms and ideas on the world.
So yeah, I disagree with Maersheimer, but do think his perspective is a very useful as a perspective on the world and it explains a lot of why the world is at is.
Nuyann 2 years ago